Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Armstrong Cup 2018-19

2456789

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 277 ✭✭EnPassant


    Dun Laoghaire 2.5 Elm Mount 5.5


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    Gonzaga A 2 - 4 Dublin University

    2 to play at later dates.

    Is Gonzaga's domination about to end?
    This prompted me to wonder just how many teams have won the Armstrong and how often and this led to an interesting find
    https://irishchesshistory.wordpress.com/provinces/armstrong-cup/

    I'm surprised that Bray has never won it, I would have thought that they had.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    EnPassant wrote: »
    Dun Laoghaire 2.5 Elm Mount 5.5

    Not looking good for Dun Laoghaire, they had 7.5 points from their opening two fixtures last year and only 3.5 this year. Also, Gonzaga "B" and Blanchardstown look a lot stronger than the two teams who were relegated last year.
    The Rathmines v Gonzaga "B" match should be a nail biter tonight. I forecast 4-4


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 954 ✭✭✭Tim Harding


    sodacat11 wrote: »
    Not looking good for Dun Laoghaire, they had 7.5 points from their opening two fixtures last year and only 3.5 this year. Also, Gonzaga "B" and Blanchardstown look a lot stronger than the two teams who were relegated last year.
    The Rathmines v Gonzaga "B" match should be a nail biter tonight. I forecast 4-4

    Yes, DL need to target at least three matches they can win and bring Tom O'G over for them, or find a new high board player.

    Looking forward to seeing the result of Rathmines tonight. It looks like a clash of the bright juniors but with a couple of doughty old-timers in the mix.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 627 ✭✭✭Retd.LoyolaCpt


    Should indeed be a good match tonight; most boards very closely matched I'd guess - one game on Monday, seven tonight.

    From Sean Coffey's site - Bray did win the Armstrong twice:
    http://www.irlchess.com/teamevents/armstrong-cup/


    I wouldn't be writing the "A" team's Obituary just yet - great result and start for Trinity though. Gonzaga staring down the barrell of their first Armstrong match loss since October 2013 (I don't count the deducted points draw/loss last year - although others may) but could still rescue it with 2/2. The B team will be out for blood too of course :) That A vs B match starts tonight too with one game, while the rest will play after the school gets back from Millfield at the weekend.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    When I left tonight the best that Rathmines looked like getting out of the seven games played is 1.5 pts and that is being optimistic :(


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 954 ✭✭✭Tim Harding


    sodacat11 wrote: »
    When I left tonight the best that Rathmines looked like getting out of the seven games played is 1.5 pts and that is being optimistic :(

    Final score, anyone?

    Now Gonzaga 3 Trinity 4 with one to be scheduled.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 627 ✭✭✭Retd.LoyolaCpt


    Rathmines 1.5-5.5 Gonzaga B; McCabe-McMorrow on Monday.

    Gonzaga B 0-1 Gonzaga A.

    Bragging rights still with the Bs for now having both played 8 games:
    Gonzaga B 5.5
    Gonzaga A 4

    :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    Rathmines 1.5-5.5 Gonzaga B; McCabe-McMorrow on Monday.

    Gonzaga B 0-1 Gonzaga A.

    Bragging rights still with the Bs for now having both played 8 games:
    Gonzaga B 5.5
    Gonzaga A 4

    :)

    "Bs" is not a very complimentary name LOL . I usually reserve such titles for the likes of Man U and Spurs.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 271 ✭✭zeitnot


    sodacat11 wrote: »
    Rathmines 1.5-5.5 Gonzaga B; McCabe-McMorrow on Monday.

    Gonzaga B 0-1 Gonzaga A.

    Bragging rights still with the Bs for now having both played 8 games:
    Gonzaga B 5.5
    Gonzaga A 4

    :)

    "Bs" is not a very complimentary name LOL . I usually reserve such titles for the likes of Man U and Spurs.
    I thought Gonzaga 'B' was going to be "Loyola".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 627 ✭✭✭Retd.LoyolaCpt


    zeitnot wrote: »
    I thought Gonzaga 'B' was going to be "Loyola".

    We’d need to start back in division 6 for that. Also would have no subs :/

    Bray 4.5-3.5 Blanchardstown

    Assume the games involving Dublin and Benildus are postponed until after the ECC.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 383 ✭✭macelligott


    With the exception of Division 4, the results are very slow to be published :-(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    With the exception of Division 4, the results are very slow to be published :-(

    Agreed.I really don't see why they can't be published soon after the matches ending, if not by the league controller then by the captains.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 954 ✭✭✭Tim Harding


    Agreed; we wouldn't have to spend so much time here exchanging information if the LCU site was kept up to date.

    Is it true the Benildus and Dublin matches yesterday were completely postponed, or only some of the boards?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,862 ✭✭✭mikhail


    Is it true the Benildus and Dublin matches yesterday were completely postponed, or only some of the boards?
    Benildus played all but one board, as far as I know. I haven't heard a result.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    Is there another league anywhere in the world, in any sport, where results aren't known until days after the games are played?


  • Registered Users Posts: 27 prey


    From Sean Coffey's site - Bray did win the Armstrong twice:
    http://www.irlchess.com/teamevents/armstrong-cup/

    Indeed. Bray also defended the title in 2001, finishing =1st.
    On the day the cup was quickly awarded to Crumlin on the basis of board count in the individual match, a 4-4 draw.
    It quickly became clear that no tiebreak was in force -the tiebreak used was taken from the promotion/relegation rule section and did not apply.
    It also soon became clear during an utterly shambolic appeal process that this was not going to be corrected.
    A subsequent AGM amended the tiebreak rule to apply to all league positions but did not address the 2001 anomaly.

    IMO the only correct decision in 2001 was to hold a playoff match and a review now should accept the 2001 Armstrong as a shared title.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,862 ✭✭✭mikhail


    sodacat11 wrote: »
    Is there another league anywhere in the world, in any sport, where results aren't known until days after the games are played?
    Yes.


  • Registered Users Posts: 271 ✭✭zeitnot


    prey wrote: »
    From Sean Coffey's site - Bray did win the Armstrong twice:
    http://www.irlchess.com/teamevents/armstrong-cup/
    For most years the results there are simply taken from David McAlister's site: https://irishchesshistory.wordpress.com/provinces/armstrong-cup/ including 1999, 2000, and 2001. That site also gives full season totals.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    mikhail wrote: »
    Yes.
    Yes? Can you back that up or is this another offhand statement like the one you made about "numerous reasons" for the ICU and UCU merging when you couldn't even tell us one good reason?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,862 ✭✭✭mikhail


    sodacat11 wrote: »
    Yes? Can you back that up
    Yes.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    mikhail wrote: »
    Yes.

    (_x_)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 627 ✭✭✭Retd.LoyolaCpt


    From the ICU results bar: Benildus 4-3 Balbriggan

    Current table as best I can see:

    Trinity 11/15
    Elm Mount 9.5/16
    Bray 9/15
    Blanch 8.5/16
    Benildus 7/15
    Balbriggan 6.5/15
    Rathmines 6/15
    Gonzaga B 5.5/8
    Gonzaga A 4/8
    Dublin 4/8
    Dun Laoghaire 3.5/16
    Kilkenny 2.5/7


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    Gonzaga "B" are 5.5/7 but hopefully that will change to 5.5/8 after tonight's battle of the MCs, (Mc Morrow and Mc Cabe)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 627 ✭✭✭Retd.LoyolaCpt


    We're 1-0 down to the A team currently with most of those games due to played this week; hence 5.5/8 currently (5.5/7 from Rathmines and 0/1 from the A match)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 627 ✭✭✭Retd.LoyolaCpt


    Draw in the game tonight so 6-2 overall.


  • Registered Users Posts: 271 ✭✭zeitnot


    Draw in the game tonight so 6-2 overall.
    Thanks for the prompt update!

    Re the other reports, 75 years ago and more results were available in the paper the next day. It's surprising that the net result of all the changes since then has been that the wait has stretched to weeks.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 383 ✭✭macelligott


    We're 1-0 down to the A team currently with most of those games due to played this week; hence 5.5/8 currently (5.5/7 from Rathmines and 0/1 from the A match)

    “We’re 1-0 down etc.” lacks clarity :-(
    Please state team names and round number!
    Posts like “R2 Dun Laoghaire 2.5-5.5 Elm Mount “ are clear to everyone :-)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    “We’re 1-0 down etc.” lacks clarity :-(
    Please state team names and round number!
    Posts like “R2 Dun Laoghaire 2.5-5.5 Elm Mount “ are clear to everyone :-)

    It doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to work out that the "WE" mentioned must be the "B" team. Elementary my dear Watson!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 383 ✭✭macelligott


    Still no updated Armstrong results :-(


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    Still no updated Armstrong results :-(

    I'm sure that they got the results quicker in 1888 when the Armstrong started.
    I really don't see why team captains can't be given the means to update the site themselves instead of this ridiculous delay.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 627 ✭✭✭Retd.LoyolaCpt


    The Rathmines captain and I input our result on Monday and Tuesday this week so must be awaiting approval from an admin.

    Gonzaga B 0.5-2.5 Gonzaga A. One game tonight, 2 on Saturday, one next Wednesday. Not sure about the other game but should be within the next week.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    The Rathmines captain and I input our result on Monday and Tuesday this week so must be awaiting approval from an admin.

    Gonzaga B 0.5-2.5 Gonzaga A. One game tonight, 2 on Saturday, one next Wednesday. Not sure about the other game but should be within the next week.

    There is almost an entire second round that needs to be updated.There has got to be a better system for updating the Armstrong results than the LCU way.
    While we are talking about the LCU , whatever happened to the Branagan Cup last season, why wasn't it played?
    Of course there is always the possibility that maybe it was played and the results just haven't been updated yet.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 627 ✭✭✭Retd.LoyolaCpt


    Not ideal but for now - current standings (I think):
    Trinity 11/15
    Elm Mount 9.5/16
    Bray 9/15
    Blanch 8.5/16
    Benildus 7/15
    Gonzaga B 6.5/11
    Balbriggan 6.5/15
    Rathmines 6.5/15
    Gonzaga A 5.5/10
    Dublin 4/8
    Dun Laoghaire 3.5/16
    Kilkenny 2.5/7


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    Rathmines 6.6/16


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 954 ✭✭✭Tim Harding


    sodacat11 wrote: »
    I'm sure that they got the results quicker in 1888 when the Armstrong started.
    I really don't see why team captains can't be given the means to update the site themselves instead of this ridiculous delay.

    Yes, in the early years results were promptly reported by Thomas Rowland in his column for the Dublin Evening Mail. Some of the games got published too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    Yes, in the early years results were promptly reported by Thomas Rowland in his column for the Dublin Evening Mail. Some of the games got published too.
    I'm sure you remember those days well although you must have been quite young at the time.;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 627 ✭✭✭Retd.LoyolaCpt


    Armstrong results updated now on the LCU site.

    Update: Gonzaga A 2.5-1.5 Gonzaga B


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 954 ✭✭✭Tim Harding


    Armstrong results updated now on the LCU site.

    Update: Gonzaga A 2.5-1.5 Gonzaga B

    Two games played this afternoon alongside the Sona Youth Cup, and the B team drew one of them, so now:
    R1 Gonzaga A 4 Gonzaga B 2, two to play.

    Gonzaga A unfortunately won the last two games to be played against Trinity so that round 2 match finished 4-4, which incidentally was also the score the last time Gonzaga didn't win the Armstrong.

    So, after two rounds, Trinity (on 11/16) will still be at least one point ahead of Gonzaga A with Elm Mount on 9.5 and Bray on 9 (1), apparently still not having played their first round top board game.

    As Kilkenny have nine (!) unreported results, it's hard to know how they stand. Were they playing Dublin Chess Club today?

    In order for rounds 1 and 2 to be reported for FIDE rating in time for the November list, any outstanding games really need to be played and officially reported by LCU to ICU by next weekend.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 479 ✭✭Joedryan


    Is there an up to date league table somewhere?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 954 ✭✭✭Tim Harding


    Joedryan wrote: »
    Is there an up to date league table somewhere?

    No, that's what we have been complaining about.

    The table at
    http://www.chessleague.net/chessorg/leinster/table.php?org=1&lid=101
    is just the same tonight as it was when I made my previous post.

    Some of the missing results can be found above but we still don't know about the nine Kilkenny games, and two of the Gonzaga A v B games are due to be played this week. Also presumably the last Balbriggan v Benildus game.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 479 ✭✭Joedryan


    Joedryan wrote: »
    Is there an up to date league table somewhere?

    No, that's what we have been complaining about.

    The table at
    http://www.chessleague.net/chessorg/leinster/table.php?org=1&lid=101
    is just the same tonight as it was when I made my previous post.

    Some of the missing results can be found above but we still don't know about the nine Kilkenny games, and two of the Gonzaga A v B games are due to be played this week. Also presumably the last Balbriggan v Benildus game.

    Can the team captains submit results to update that table in real time?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,862 ✭✭✭mikhail


    Joedryan wrote: »
    Can the team captains submit results to update that table in real time?
    No, the backend is a complicated offline excel/visual basic package Peter Scott put together a good few years ago.

    Something more responsive with a simple interface would be a nice upgrade, but finding someone with the skills and time and motivation to write and maintain it (at least until the bugs are worked out) is not trivial. I thought about suggesting a wiki-based approach, but it'd lack functionality beyond a live table and I suspect it'd require a couple of fairly active editors to keep it going. The current system handles ratings files input/output and other functions too, and I'd rather have a slowly updating table than heap work on the leagues controllers or duplicate work.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 479 ✭✭Joedryan


    mikhail wrote: »
    Joedryan wrote: »
    Can the team captains submit results to update that table in real time?
    No, the backend is a complicated offline excel/visual basic package Peter Scott put together a good few years ago.

    Something more responsive with a simple interface would be a nice upgrade, but finding someone with the skills and time and motivation to write and maintain it (at least until the bugs are worked out) is not trivial. I thought about suggesting a wiki-based approach, but it'd lack functionality beyond a live table and I suspect it'd require a couple of fairly active editors to keep it going. The current system handles ratings files input/output and other functions too, and I'd rather have a slowly updating table than heap work on the leagues controllers or duplicate work.

    I had something going an odd 15 years back running of a Microsoft ASP page,

    these days I'd probably do it different and add in a bit more security to prevent anarchists from hacking it, but its not that hard really


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,862 ✭✭✭mikhail


    Joedryan wrote: »
    I had something going an odd 15 years back running of a Microsoft ASP page,

    these days I'd probably do it different and add in a bit more security to prevent anarchists from hacking it, but its not that hard really
    You wouldn't happen to be at a loose end, would you? ;)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 479 ✭✭Joedryan


    mikhail wrote: »
    Joedryan wrote: »
    I had something going an odd 15 years back running of a Microsoft ASP page,

    these days I'd probably do it different and add in a bit more security to prevent anarchists from hacking it, but its not that hard really
    You wouldn't happen to be at a loose end, would you? ;)
    up to my ears at the min but this is not a particularly difficult effort

    LCU feel free to get on to me if you wish


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 627 ✭✭✭Retd.LoyolaCpt


    Gonzaga A 5-2 Gonzaga B (Collins vs O'Donnell to play this week)

    Gonzaga B 1-0 Balbriggan (late tactic in my game from a worse position)

    Flimsy table update:
    Trinity 11/16
    Elm Mount 9.5/16
    Gonzaga A 9/15
    Bray 9/15
    Gonzaga B 9/16
    Blanch 8.5/16
    Benildus 7/15
    Balbriggan 6.5/16
    Rathmines 6.5/16
    Dublin 4/8
    Dun Laoghaire 3.5/16
    Kilkenny 2.5/7

    Kilkenny CC was away on their club trip (to Germany) last week while Dublin were at the ECC so presumably that game will happen soon - maybe this Saturday if neither team is going in numbers to Limerick. De Verdier vs Quinn is this Thursday I believe. Healy vs Nolan (delayed for the ECC) should be soon too bringing us up to date.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    I am no expert on computers but it beggars belief that the chess league site cannot be updated by the captains of the teams as soon as the matches finish.
    If the results were sent in to the Controller by carrier pigeon and then posted in envelopes with stamps to each club we would have the results sooner than we get them on the chess league site now (and that is not an exaggeration).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,862 ✭✭✭mikhail


    sodacat11 wrote: »
    I am no expert on computers but it beggars belief that the chess league site cannot be updated by the captains of the teams as soon as the matches finish.
    If the results were sent in to the Controller by carrier pigeon and then posted in envelopes with stamps to each club we would have the results sooner than we get them on the chess league site now (and that is not an exaggeration).
    I'm sure they'll welcome your offer of help.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,300 ✭✭✭sodacat11


    mikhail wrote: »
    I'm sure they'll welcome your offer of help.

    I will supply the pigeons.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement