Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Changes in the GAA - super thread

1505153555664

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,800 ✭✭✭Always_Running



    The likely dates for the 7 game league phase would be: April 3rd, April 10th, April 17th, April 24th, May 8th, May 15th, May 22nd.

    Might we lucky to get some decent weather in May but April is nearly always cold, wet or windy the type of weather not suited to attracting large crowds.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,418 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    I just did a bit of analysis of the bottom three teams in Div 1 between 2009 (first year with just 4 straight divisions) and 2019 (last pre COVID season) and how they fared in that years championship.

    The breakdown is below, but the summary is on two occasions a bottom three team won it, on one occasion they lost a final, on 2 occasions they got to semi finals, and on 9 occasions they got to quarters.

    So of 33 examples, 14 (42%) got to at least the QF.

    Excluding the bottom three teams for any further involvement after the 7 league games is pretty s**ty in my opinion.

    That 6th place in the league was always a decent landing spot for a lot of teams who needed to re-build or were hit by injuries, or for a team newly promoted.

    Get to 6th and you are not going down, but you still could risk points by experimenting, blooding new players etc.

    If it's implemented it's going to make Div 1 really tough.

    Personally I don't think Div 1 team should be excluded at all.

    Have a playoff with a Div 2 team instead to get to the next stage.


    Championship finishing point after coming bottom 3 in Division 1

    Winners 2 

    Final 1

    SF 2

    QF 9

    Rd1 7

    Rd2 5

    Rd3 3

    Rd4 4 

    2009

    Dublin - QF

    Donegal - QF

    Westmeath - Rd2

    2010

    Monaghan - Rd4

    Derry - Rd3

    Tyrone - QF

    2011

    Armagh - Rd3

    Monaghan - Rd1

    Galway - Rd2

    2012

    Donegal - Winners

    Armagh - Rd1

    Laois - QF

    2013

    Kerry - SF 

    Donegal - QF

    Down - Rd2

    2014

    Kerry - Winners

    Kildare - Rd4

    Westmeath - Rd1

    2015

    Kerry - Final

    Tyrone - Rd2

    Derry - Rd3

    2016

    Monaghan - Rd1

    Cork - Rd4

    Down - Rd1

    2017

    Tyrone - SF

    Cavan - Rd1

    Roscommon - QF

    2018

    Mayo - Rd2

    Donegal - QF

    Kildare - QF

    2019

    Monaghan - Rd1

    Roscommon - QF

    Cavan - Rd4



  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Under the proposed system division 1 is the championship. The teams who previously used it to develop and were relegated or just escaped will now you the provincial championship earlier in the season to develop.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 668 ✭✭✭Rockfish


    But we will all have to adjust to a new mindset, there will be no NFL as we knew it, it will be the championship, your first 'league' game is your first game in the cship. Teams will adjust their training/preparation accordingly. btw when is this vote?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,418 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    I guess, it will take a bit of getting used to, overall i think it's a good idea

    The vote is Saturday 23rd



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,807 ✭✭✭MacDanger


    What's the breakdown of the 16 teams that make it through? I can't find the exact details anywhere (which makes me think that the GAA have absolutely no desire for these changes to be successful)

    Top 5 in D1

    Top 3 in D2?

    Top 2 in D3?

    Top 2 in D4?

    4 x provincial winners?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,800 ✭✭✭Always_Running


    10 through to the knock out stages.

    5 Div 1 and Div 2 winners into the All-Ireland quarters. 1st, 2nd, 3rd 4th in Div 1 will be seeded.

    Second and 3rd in Div 2 will play the Div 3, 4 winners for the final two quarter final spots.

    The provincial championships that was connected to the All-Ireland series becomes a pre season league competition played in February and March.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,843 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Don't think the provincial championships are linked in any way to the AIC/L.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,418 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    I don't think it's because they don't want the change it's just that they are terrible at things like this.

    I went looking for a breakdown of the two proposals last month (to take my mind off the Mayo All Ireland loss) and the only place I could find anything of value was in some tabloid newspaper article from a few months earlier.

    This sort of thing should be front page on the main GAA website.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,909 ✭✭✭Coillte_Bhoy


    It's a bit mad that such important proposals are still not clearly understood, though the fact that the GAA establishment is against them provides a clue. Still, i cant understand why the media arent all over this? Makes no sense



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,418 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    Article in this week's Kerryman saying that there were a lot of negativity from Kerry clubs about option B (option A was a non starter) because of what happens to the bottom three in Division 1.

    The point was brought up that sometimes league places are decided by points difference.

    And I agree, where you have a small competition of only seven games the margins can be very tight, so a point or two scored or conceded could be the difference between a QF place and not.

    I think every Div 1 teams should see at least one game after the league section, instead of having to yeild to someone from Div 3 and 4.

    They are in Div 1 for a reason after all.

    I think the whole thing will fail on that.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,909 ✭✭✭Coillte_Bhoy


    Ya, would like to see all Div 1 teams have one knockout game but i think the main thing is for this to get through and see how it works, can always be tweaked after next year. The lack of debate on this is quite soemthing though, i was talking to a few GAA heads, heavily involved in clubs etc last night, and they didnt really know anything about it



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,632 ✭✭✭theoneeyedman


    This is dead in the water imho, having the 3 options is a means of splitting any vote for change, and the status quo will remain. Is it 66% or something required to approve a change at Congress?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,909 ✭✭✭Coillte_Bhoy


    There are only two proposals and both will be voted on separately, 60% is needed



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,632 ✭✭✭theoneeyedman


    I stand corrected so, I thought there were 3,the A,B and C options.

    That's a horse of a different colour so, if that's the case.....my own fault for not reading up on it properly so, but the info on the proposals is scant enough.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,909 ✭✭✭Coillte_Bhoy


    Finally found a good outline of both proposals

    https://www.independent.ie/sport/gaelic-games/gaelic-football/dysfunction-of-provinces-driving-spirit-for-reform-40933140.html

    Option A – Eight-county provincial championships:

    Bottom three seeded counties in Leinster and bottom one in Ulster move to Connacht and Munster (seedings based on NFL positions).

    Each province split into two round-robin groups of four, guaranteeing counties three matches. Each group winner qualifies for All-Ireland quarter-finals, second and third placed into the qualifiers. Fourth placed teams headed to the Tailteann Cup, if a Division 3 or 4 county.

    Option B – League structure for championship:

    NFL moves to summer months with provincial championships played over February/March as a stand-alone competition. The championship would be played on the Allianz League basis with the top five teams in Division 1 and Division 2 table-toppers qualifying for All-Ireland quarter-finals. Second and third-placed Division 2 teams as well as Division 3 and 4 winners go through to preliminary quarter-finals to fill the last two spots in the last eight. The Tailteann Cup would comprise those Division 3 and 4 teams who don’t qualify for knock-out stages of the All-Ireland SFC.

    If both proposals fail to reach the necessary 60 per cent the status quo remains with some version of the qualifiers in place next year, along with the provincial system as before. Super 8s may be jettisoned due to split season being introduced in 2022.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,843 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    Well in a sense there are actually four options, in that if both reform proposals are defeated I believe the congress will then have to decide whether to retain the super 8s or revert to a straight back door system.

    But yes there are two actual reform proposals, A and B. And apparently B (league as championship) is the one gaining traction.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,909 ✭✭✭Coillte_Bhoy


    I was under the impression that the Super 8's are gone anyway



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,843 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf


    That Sindo article says they 'may' be jettisoned



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,911 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Discussions on 'proposal A' and 'proposal B'


    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,418 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    Just looking at the last 11 (normal) seasons again.

    Consider the following

    With Option B places 6, 7 and 8 in Div 1 play no further part in the championship after the league stages.

    2nd and 3rd in Div 2 play off against 1st and 1st in Div 3 and Div 4 for a QF place.

    Now based on a well used line that's thrown out there that Div 3 and Div 4 teams rarely beat teams in the divisions higher than them in the championship, one would have to assume that the Div 2 teams would more often than not come out on top in the playoff v Div 3 and 4.

    So essentially the 6th place team in Div 1 is yielding a place in the QF to the 3rd pace team in Div 2.

    Now based on that, between 2009 and 2019 taking the championship exit point of both the Div 1 6th place team and the Div 2 3rd place team the following was the case.

    On only two of eleven occasions did the Div 2 third pace team fare better than the Div 1 6th place team in the ensuing championship.

    On two occasions they both finished the championship at the same level.

    And on 7 occasions the 6th placed Div 1 team fared better than the 3rd placed Div 2 team.

    It's stupid and will not pass.

    2009

    Dublin (QF) yield to Kildare (QF)

    2010

    Monaghan (rd4) yield to Donegal (rd1)

    2011

    Armagh (rd3) yield to Derry (rd4)

    2012

    Donegal (Winners) yield to Galway (rd2)

    2013

    Kerry (SF) yield to Laois (Rd4)

    2014

    Kerry (winners) yield to Meath (Rd4)

    2015

    Kerry (Final) yield to Meath (Rd2)

    2016

    Monaghan (Rd2) yield to Galway (QF)

    2017

    Tyrone (SF) yield to Meath (Rd3)

    2018

    Mayo (Rd2) yield to Clare (Rd2)

    2019

    Monaghan (Rd2) yield to Fermanagh (Rd1)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,911 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm




  • Registered Users Posts: 2,079 ✭✭✭blowitupref


    At the last numbers of Congress it was 66% needed for any motion to pass on the 23rd its down to 60%.

    For those that think neither proposal will get voted in its worth pointing out the daftness of a group stage for the last 8 of All-Ireland championship got 76% of the vote and they refused to remove Dublins two games in Croke Park in year 2.

    IMO they should go with the status quo and come back another year with the flaws in proposal B ironed out.



  • Registered Users Posts: 586 ✭✭✭Treble double


    You can't compare the past leauges to the new competition.

    Some teams in division1 have used the leauge as preparation for the championship and just do enough to avoid relegation so past standings don't mean much and comparisons are irrelevant

    Proposal B means the leauge is championship and if you can't finish in the top 5 out of 8 after 7 games you deserve go be out of the competition.

    Any team with ambitions of winning the big prize will want to be playing division 1 but the beauty of this is it gives all counties 7 games with teams of similar ability and a chance to come into the knockout series with momentum and confidence making them a dangerous opponent. Plus there is a secondary competition for div 3 and 4 teams.

    This proposal is a no brainer and I don't think it needs much tweaking.

    It will be a kick in the guts to football if it doesn't get the go ahead.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,418 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    Ok, I'll throw this at you

    In the 11 seasons between 2009 and 2019 here are the gaps between the 5th placed Div 1 team and the 6th place Div 1 team.

    Essentially the gap between getting further in the championship or giving up a place for the sake of the 11th, 17th or 25th place team in Ireland.

    2009 -1pt

    2010 - 2pts (actually the bottom 3 all finished on the same amount of points)

    2011 - 1pt

    2012 - scoring difference of 6.

    2013 - scoring difference of 13

    2014 - 2pts

    2015 - scoring difference of 8

    2016 - scoring difference of 2

    2017 - 1pt

    2018 - 1pt

    2019 - 4pts (huge in the grand scheme of things)

    So in summary on only three occasions was the difference between 5th and 6th a single win or greater.

    And on some occasions it came down to scoring difference.

    The reality is that a 7 game league, with an unbalanced home and away schedule and two points for a win is way to small a sample size to be the determinate of who finishes their season early.

    No matter how serious teams start taking the 7 games in the new structure that is not going to change.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,843 ✭✭✭✭Loafing Oaf




  • Registered Users Posts: 586 ✭✭✭Treble double


    "Who finishes their season early"

    Every team is guaranteed 7 games in this new championship format.

    The previous system or systems we had meant that only the elite went deep into the summer and everyone else had one or two games.

    Proposal b gives every team a standard amount of games in the championship and it let's teams develop and build.

    It's fair to everyone not just the Kerrys and Dublins and Tyrones.

    I don't care how tight the margins between team 5 and the rest are in division 1, if you are not in the top five after 7 championship games you deserve to be gone.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,079 ✭✭✭blowitupref


    Looking that league/championship format for 3 teams in Div 1 and 5 in Div 2 the season will be over by the end of May or early June


    As for your final deserve to be comment. 5 teams playing in weaker divisions will go on to play in the AI series, the 6th,7th,8th placed teams in Div 1 aren't getting what they deserve but are victims of a poorly planned championship format.



  • Registered Users Posts: 586 ✭✭✭Treble double


    6, 7 and 8 are getting what they deserve and that is relegation for 7 and 8 and out of the championship for 6.

    I would concede that maybe you could tweak it to have 6 teams from div 1 going through and reduce it to 2 teams in division 2 but other than that this proposal b is almost perfect and it's streets ahead of any other alternative that's been mooted.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,079 ✭✭✭blowitupref


    Again they are playing in a stronger division. Mayo for example could get relegated but if given the chance could still reach AI final, they won't be given that chance with this format.

    I'd go with the status quo for now, tidy up on the flaws of proposal B and come back with it at a later date at Congress, that way the shelf life of that format would last longer.

    I also feel proposal B would work better in a April to September window than February to July but that will require a reversal of the spit season that was only recently voted in.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,418 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    Usually in Div. 1 you get one team that is out of it's depth, one that struggles and after that it's a few teams that are fairly equal on any given year.

    And making the league the championship and "more important" is not going to change that, you are going to get a team in 6th place that could equally have gone deep in the championship, had they finished 5th.

    And they may have only missed on on 5th by a single loss, or less. And that loss could have come in one of their four away games, where as the team in 5th could have had three away games.

    I think it's a great idea overall, but the loss of the 6th place team in Div 1 is far too unforgiving.

    I'd expect a lot more debate about it in the week leading up the vote.



  • Registered Users Posts: 586 ✭✭✭Treble double


    I think people are missing the point,these 7 games will not be like leauge games of old, every one of them will be crucial championship matches, if you can't finish in the top 5 out of 8 teams you have no chance of winning the all Ireland anyway and can't have any misgivings about being out.

    We have being cowtowing to the superpowers for too long this is great for the minnows.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭manofwisdom


    I'd expect only the latter stages games to be crucial matches and theyll likely be the matches that will attract the biggest attendances.

    No chance you say, I'd give them a better chance that 2nd, 3rd in Div 2 or Div 3, 4 winners of winning the AI if all had the equal chance.


    As for the minnows how is proposal B great for them? Such a format will not close the gap between the has and has nots.



  • Registered Users Posts: 586 ✭✭✭Treble double


    It's great for the minnows because it gives them 7 games in the premium competition at a time of the year that is conducive to good football as opposed to being sent packing after 2 games while the big boys get on with playing late into the summer.

    I would argue that a team that can't finish in the top 5 of 8 after 7 games has a similar chance of winning the all Ireland as 2 and 3 in division 2 and winners of division 3 and 4 which is slim to none. This competition will allow weaker teams to build and improve as they will be guaranteed 7 games in late spring/summer which they have been previously denied. In the previous incarnations of the championship the strong got stronger and the weak got weaker.

    Every round of this leauge will be crucial if you lose your first game you will be under pressure



  • Registered Users Posts: 586 ✭✭✭Treble double


    Tyrone, Kerry, Dublin, Mayo - your All Ireland winner will come from one of those. Donegal, Monaghan, Galway have been huffing and puffing but are a bit off the top four. Let Donegal Monaghan and Armagh slog it out for fifth spot it will make for some entertainment

    Galway will be in div 2 so they should be OK. I dont see any major big names suffering because of the new system. The four big boys will make it their business to be in the top five and let the pretenders get in there if their good enough.

    Meanwhile let the rest of the teams in the country have 7 meaningful games in the premium competition and let them build and progress if they can.

    There is an appetite for football in all counties its not all about the Kerrys, Dublins and Tyrones.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭manofwisdom


    Dublin have already gone into transition and the underage talent they had to build their senior team around isn't as good as it was. Who knows in the next year or two it might be the prime opportunity for a Meath or Kildare to win a leinster championship title which would mean a great deal for those counties. A leinster pre season league played in February on the other hand would mean about as much as winning the O'Byrne Cup.

    Tyrone the current All-Ireland champs and Mayo runners up one if not both could finish outside the top five in a very competitive Div 1 and Kerry will find this route tougher than winning a Munster title (no harm many will say) There is very little difference between Monaghan, Donegal, Armagh the former two have done it before and are capable of beating all in a league group game.

    Monaghan relegated Galway to Div 2 this summer but if Proposal B is in place Galway will have a better opportunity to reach the last 8 of championship, who put such of a format together and thought that's fine?

    As for the minnows, the normal 7 game NFL we had in place up until this year allowed teams in Div 3,4 to build and improve. Monaghan for example was a Div 3 team in 2013 and went on to become established Div 1 team and won a couple of Ulster titles and reached AI semi final.

    The only problems with it was the competition wasn't promoted right and it probably could have reverted back to the A and B divisions we had as that helped to someone close the gap.

    Monaghan examples is becoming rare nowadays and running with proposal B flaws and all do next to nothing to address the enormous gulf in quality between the top teams and the majority bottom teams.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,800 ✭✭✭Always_Running


    I'd put decent money on your top 4 of Tyrone, Mayo, Dublin, Kerry to reach the AI semi finals again with a status quo format next year. With proposal B there is a strong possibility that at least one of those 4 will not even reach the All-Ireland quarter finals as a group format with three games at home and 4 away could prove to be telling and 5th and 6th placed teams in Div 1 might by separate on scoring difference. That type of format might be acceptable for the NFL but to decide the championship faith of a county I think not.

    I don't agree with your view that Every round of this league will be crucial as they simply won't especially in Div 3,4 and Kildare in Div 1 could be relegated with a few games to spare and you could get a situation in Div 2 whereby a team can't get relegated or finish in the top 3 come round 7, hardly crucial stuff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 255 ✭✭Iecrawfc


    one thing which will guarantee that is if you let too many teams progress from the league stage, let 6 or all 8 in and the games become warmups for the knockouts, teams have to something at stake in each match, the Munster Hurling round robin was a good example of this, teans couldn't afford more than 1 loss usually.



  • Registered Users Posts: 586 ✭✭✭Treble double


    People are seriously concerned that 1 of the top 6 won't make the the knockout stages of the championship even though they will be given 7 games to show that they are good enough to do so and because of this they argue this proposal is fatally flawed.

    But they have no bother returning to the old system where ritual drubbings are handed out to Leitrim, Sligo, Clare, Waterford, Antrim and every Leinster team that play Dublin in outdated Provincial Championships. That is elitism at its finest.

    The provincial championships barely deserve to be kept as pre season competitions, a system that has 12 teams in one group, 9 in another, 6 in another and 5 in the other is flawed and prehistoric.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 538 ✭✭✭B2021M


    You don't see an issue with a team that finishes 6th because they had to play the five best teams in the country being excluded from the remainder of the championship but it is ok to include the team that finishes top of the weakest 8 teams (div 4)??

    I think it is good that the winners of division 3 and 4 are included but 6th in div 1 (in fact all of division 1) should at least get a playoff place.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,807 ✭✭✭MacDanger


    running with proposal B flaws and all do next to nothing to address the enormous gulf in quality between the top teams and the majority bottom teams.


    No amount of format changes are going to make any huge difference to the gap between the top teams and the rest; coaching structures and funding are the only way to do that IMO



  • Registered Users Posts: 586 ✭✭✭Treble double


    I will concede that maybe top 6 in div 1 and only top 2 in div 2 should qualify, that is maybe the only tweak that is needed. Any other proposal that has been mooted has serious flaws.

    I have no problem with the bottom 2 in div 1 being out of the championship on recent form that will be Kildare and either Monaghan or Armagh realistically are any of those 3 all Ireland contenders? No. And whichever 2 finish bottom they will be relegated and can rebuild. Kildare got to a leinster final last year and played to not get a hiding so they are along way from having notions of winning an All Ireland.

    Again I will say the provincial system is not fit for purpose. In munster every team that gets drawn against Kerry will get a pasting ditto in Leinster with Dublin, Sligo and Leitrim are whipping boys in Connaught as are Antrim and Fermanagh in Ulster. That's 19 teams that only have drubbings to look forward to under the old systems. Let's give them some fair play and not be always worried about one glamour team missing out on the knockouts.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭manofwisdom


    7 games to show in the group that contains the top 10 teams (can make an argument who's 7th,8th best Armagh, Kildare or last years Div 1 teams Galway, Roscommon)

    Under proposal B five of the ten counties qualifying for the championship series are lower-ranked than several who are eliminated and the two teams that get relegated from Div 1 next year will have a better chance of reaching All-Ireland series the following season.

    As for ritual drubbings what do you think will happen if a Div 3,4 winners ends up facing a top 4 team in All Ireland quarter final?

    Provincial championships hadn't groups they were knock out up until 2001 and the last two years. The pre season competition under proposal B will be a group format and played in the spring, that's basically the FBD, O Bryne retained than Provincial championships.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,074 ✭✭✭manofwisdom


    Yes that needs to be addressed first before any format changes and it needed to be done a number of years ago.



  • Registered Users Posts: 586 ✭✭✭Treble double


    The leauge has proved that teams find their natural level and you have competitive games in every division.

    The point is that under this new proposal every team in the country gets 7 championship games in late Spring/Summer allowing teams to grow and develop as opposed to the weak having 1 or 2 games giving no scope for improvement and development while the strong go deep into the Summer and the gap between the haves and have not gets increasingly wider.

    As for the div 3 and 4 winners getting drubbings in the quarter finals they will have to negotiate a top div 2 team in the preliminary quarter finals first and if they do that I wouldn't have too many fears for them in the quarters.

    Derry won div 3 last season and they were unlucky to lose to Donegal in the championship, a Donegal who many had down as dark horses to win the championship.

    What has to be factored in is the confidence and belief that winning games breeds in a team and the damage that is done by taking ritual hidings in outdated championship formats.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,079 ✭✭✭blowitupref


    No 6th, 7th, 8th place team in the last 10 of the championship whereas those who finish numbers 9th , 10, 11, 17 and 25 are allowed into the knock-out stages.

    I can only imagine the heated debate on here and elsewhere once this deeply flawed system is up and running.



  • Registered Users Posts: 538 ✭✭✭B2021M


    Is there any other competition in the world that would work in as ludicrous a way as this proposal?!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,418 ✭✭✭✭Fr Tod Umptious


    I will concede that maybe top 6 in div 1 and only top 2 in div 2 should qualify, that is maybe the only tweak that is needed.

    Thank you, now you are seeing sense.



  • Registered Users Posts: 2,079 ✭✭✭blowitupref


    Highly doubt it and the worse part is plenty of good journalists and many figures in the GPA I have a lot of respect for can't see or simply choose to ignore these flaws as they promote Proposal B as the best thing since sliced bread.

    Change is needed and it will happen this year or next but we need to get it right as this change will be staying in place long term.



  • Registered Users Posts: 538 ✭✭✭B2021M


    Is there an agreed number of weeks dedicated to intercounty senior football or is that being discussed still?



  • Advertisement
Advertisement