Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Marathon Improvers Thread.

1171820222339

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 187 ✭✭Hedgehoggy


    coogy wrote: »
    Thanks G! Your PB's are very similar to mine (your time for last year is what I was actually aiming for on the day) so I'll be following your journey to DCM very closely too. :)

    What I've found really useful lately is reading DCM race reports from others who finished in or around 3:30. Some of them are so well written, you get a real sense of exactly what it takes, both physically and mentally.
    Also, Its definitely a psychological boost when others tell you that your goals are achievable.

    Thats a great idea! Will have to do some trawling!


  • Registered Users Posts: 735 ✭✭✭Treviso


    Thought I would throw my name on here too. Even though I'm part of the novice group for this years boards DCM, I'm aiming for 3.30 too. Although given my unproven endurance, I'd be happy as well if I suffered along & finish under 3.40.

    I'm following the 18 week P&D advanced marathon plan which peaks at 57 miles and I'm about 5 weeks in. Enjoying the miles & the tough MPR runs. Feel a lot stronger since I started it.

    Will have a read through this thread to gain some insight into other peoples experiences. My wife has previously ran 3.20 in DCM and is giving me loads of help with my running but the more advice the better.

    My PBs so far are
    5k: 20.48
    10 mile: 74.31
    Half: 1.39.45
    25k: 2hrs 5mins
    All got in 2019

    Running Charleville half before DCM so hoping that will tell if the 3.30 is realistic or not


  • Registered Users Posts: 187 ✭✭Hedgehoggy


    Treviso wrote: »
    Thought I would throw my name on here too. Even though I'm part of the novice group for this years boards DCM, I'm aiming for 3.30 too. Although given my unproven endurance, I'd be happy as well if I suffered along & finish under 3.40.

    I'm following the 18 week P&D advanced marathon plan which peaks at 57 miles and I'm about 5 weeks in. Enjoying the miles & the tough MPR runs. Feel a lot stronger since I started it.

    Will have a read through this thread to gain some insight into other peoples experiences. My wife has previously ran 3.20 in DCM and is giving me loads of help with my running but the more advice the better.

    My PBs so far are
    5k: 20.48
    10 mile: 74.31
    Half: 1.39.45
    25k: 2hrs 5mins
    All got in 2019

    Running Charleville half before DCM so hoping that will tell if the 3.30 is realistic or not

    You've done loads of races this yr! Fair play! I've only managed to get out to two.

    I've heard loads about the p&d plan. Sounds like a challenging one. Looking forward to hearing more


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,250 ✭✭✭coogy


    Hedgehoggy wrote: »
    Thats a great idea! Will have to do some trawling!

    Meant to ask, what plan will you be following?


  • Registered Users Posts: 187 ✭✭Hedgehoggy


    coogy wrote: »
    Meant to ask, what plan will you be following?

    Followed the meno plan last Yr and have decided to do it again. I liked the flexibility in it as I can fit it around my wk. But, I and I'm not sure if this is the wisest move I'm trying to adapt it a little so that it's a little harder again mainly by upping the mileage and adding some MP miles into another run (not the LR) during the week. The first two weeks have gone OK and I'm going to switch around a run ltr so I have another 2 hard wks before a step bk. I'll reassess after that stepback whether to keep going with the additional session or not.

    Kinda wish I had done a 10k before setting off on the plan but will def do a half and hopefully a 10m!

    How're you finding the grads plan?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,922 ✭✭✭deisedude


    Treviso wrote: »
    Thought I would throw my name on here too. Even though I'm part of the novice group for this years boards DCM, I'm aiming for 3.30 too. Although given my unproven endurance, I'd be happy as well if I suffered along & finish under 3.40.

    I'm following the 18 week P&D advanced marathon plan which peaks at 57 miles and I'm about 5 weeks in. Enjoying the miles & the tough MPR runs. Feel a lot stronger since I started it.

    Will have a read through this thread to gain some insight into other peoples experiences. My wife has previously ran 3.20 in DCM and is giving me loads of help with my running but the more advice the better.

    My PBs so far are
    5k: 20.48
    10 mile: 74.31
    Half: 1.39.45
    25k: 2hrs 5mins
    All got in 2019

    Running Charleville half before DCM so hoping that will tell if the 3.30 is realistic or not

    Word of advice on Charleville from personal experience. Dont get cocky like me if you run a good time and change your goal upwards for DCM. Charleville is probably the fastest HM course in the country


  • Registered Users Posts: 735 ✭✭✭Treviso


    deisedude wrote: »
    Word of advice on Charleville from personal experience. Dont get cocky like me if you run a good time and change your goal upwards for DCM. Charleville is probably the fastest HM course in the country

    Thanks for the advice, my wife has told me the Charleville course is one of the best HM routes around. So I have been pre warned already! Plus I wouldnt be changing my goal upwards no matter what


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,493 ✭✭✭The Davestator


    coogy wrote: »
    Thanks G! Your PB's are very similar to mine (your time for last year is what I was actually aiming for on the day) so I'll be following your journey to DCM very closely too. :)

    What I've found really useful lately is reading DCM race reports from others who finished in or around 3:30. Some of them are so well written, you get a real sense of exactly what it takes, both physically and mentally.
    Also, Its definitely a psychological boost when others tell you that your goals are achievable.

    I'd love to read some of those reports, but not sure how to find them - any in particular to read for a goal sub 3:30? Thanks


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,191 ✭✭✭healy1835


    I'd love to read some of those reports, but not sure how to find them - any in particular to read for a goal sub 3:30? Thanks

    https://touch.boards.ie/thread/2057633045/8

    My own race report when I broke 3:30 a couple of years back......my own log actually starts off in the midst of training for that DCM. Might be useful to someone :)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,489 ✭✭✭✭Murph_D


    I'd love to read some of those reports, but not sure how to find them - any in particular to read for a goal sub 3:30? Thanks

    Here’s one of mine if any use:

    https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showpost.php?p=105132273&postcount=2701


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,191 ✭✭✭healy1835


    Murph_D wrote: »

    A masterpiece of a report :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,250 ✭✭✭coogy


    I'd love to read some of those reports, but not sure how to find them - any in particular to read for a goal sub 3:30? Thanks

    Sorry, I made that sound like you could search for race reports according to category. Its just that I've read through so many, I've gotten to know which of them achieved finish times that would be relevant to me. :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,799 ✭✭✭Huzzah!


    Murph_D wrote: »
    healy1835 wrote: »
    A masterpiece of a report :)

    One I referred to many times during my own Hanson cycle and that I've now posted on the Novices thread for them to have a read of.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,834 ✭✭✭OOnegative


    https://www.boards.ie/vbulletin/showthread.php?t=2057164038&page=125

    My first marathon report under my previous guise.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 397 ✭✭Rossi7


    Treviso wrote: »
    Thought I would throw my name on here too. Even though I'm part of the novice group for this years boards DCM, I'm aiming for 3.30 too. Although given my unproven endurance, I'd be happy as well if I suffered along & finish under 3.40.

    I'm following the 18 week P&D advanced marathon plan which peaks at 57 miles and I'm about 5 weeks in. Enjoying the miles & the tough MPR runs. Feel a lot stronger since I started it.

    Will have a read through this thread to gain some insight into other peoples experiences. My wife has previously ran 3.20 in DCM and is giving me loads of help with my running but the more advice the better.

    My PBs so far are
    5k: 20.48
    10 mile: 74.31
    Half: 1.39.45
    25k: 2hrs 5mins
    All got in 2019

    Running Charleville half before DCM so hoping that will tell if the 3.30 is realistic or not
    All my times were quicker than your current PB's before I took on DCM, granted I missed 4-6 weeks being injured and on holidays in the lead up to the marathon. I don't want to burst your bubble but you need to respect the distance because I can assure you it won't respect you. I finished 4.05 was hoping under 4 even though my times said I could run a 3.40


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 735 ✭✭✭Treviso


    Rossi7 wrote: »
    All my times were quicker than your current PB's before I took on DCM, granted I missed 4-6 weeks being injured and on holidays in the lead up to the marathon. I don't want to burst your bubble but you need to respect the distance because I can assure you it won't respect you. I finished 4.05 was hoping under 4 even though my times said I could run a 3.40

    Yep I get it, I've read many a DCM race report where things goes downhill for many during the later miles. Many of those runners had better times than me too. All I can do is follow my plan as best as I can and see what happens on the day.

    Would being injured for 4-6 weeks of a 12 week plan not be a massive reason for not reaching your target?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,489 ✭✭✭✭Murph_D


    Treviso wrote: »
    Yep I get it, I've read many a DCM race report where things goes downhill for many during the later miles. Many of those runners had better times than me too. All I can do is follow my plan as best as I can and see what happens on the day.

    Would being injured for 4-6 weeks of a 12 week plan not be a massive reason for not reaching your target?

    Yes, of course it would. But so could many other things. The marathon is different to shorter races because for most non elites it involves running for longer than our glycogen stores can fuel. Therefore we need specific endurance adaptations as well as a good fuelling strategy to pull it off. An awful lot of runners don’t have the proper adaptation, which requires a considerable running base at a range of paces sufficient to deliver the endurance and speed necessary for your target. The most important ingredient of a good ‘improver’ marathon IMO is that base of appropriately paced mileage, usually amassed over several years. Any reasonable marathon plan will then bring you through. No matter how well you train, you will still fade in the final quarter - the question is how much, and how will you handle it?

    Best of luck with it this year.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,250 ✭✭✭coogy


    Murph_D wrote: »
    No matter how well you train, you will still fade in the final quarter - the question is how much, and how will you handle it?

    "Digging deep" is something I'm gradually getting used to and becoming more successful at, provided the previous miles have been well managed. I'm guessing this is where race experience (for shorter distances) comes in useful when faced with the final quarter of the marathon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,686 ✭✭✭ittakestwo


    For non elite runners its all about weekly mileage. The more the better, After 3 failed marathons where I could not run it all I got the advice my peak of 60km a week was not enough to get me to run it all ( although some getaway with that amount). I upped to peak at 90 km in training and then was able to run one all.

    Studies have shown the correlation between marathon times and weekly millage is irrefutable.

    In all 3 marathons where I could only get to c.30km before I had to start walking, my PB marathon time was 3.55. when I upped the weekly millage I ran a 3.01 in 2017.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,489 ✭✭✭✭Murph_D


    coogy wrote: »
    "Digging deep" is something I'm gradually getting used to and becoming more successful at, provided the previous miles have been well managed. I'm guessing this is where race experience (for shorter distances) comes in useful when faced with the final quarter of the marathon.

    It's an interesting question - I'd imagine shorter race experience certainly helps, but there's only so far you can 'dig' if the reserves aren't actually there, which is where the training (and for the marathon, pre-race nutrition and in-race fuelling strategy) comes into play. Not saying it's rocket science, but getting the basics right and controlling the controllable has a lot to do with it. Providing the reserves are there, getting through the hurt - turning off the Central Governor - is certainly something that can be improved upon with practice.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,883 ✭✭✭Younganne


    Murph_D wrote: »
    It's an interesting question - I'd imagine shorter race experience certainly helps, but there's only so far you can 'dig' if the reserves aren't actually there, which is where the training (and for the marathon, pre-race nutrition and in-race
    fuelling strategy) comes into play. Not saying it's rocket science, but getting the basics right and controlling the controllable has a lot to do with it. Providing the reserves are there, getting through the hurt - turning off the Central Governor - is certainly something that can be improved upon with practice.

    That's a fantastic read on the Central Governor which also has links to other great articles.

    Thanks for sharing Denis


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,476 ✭✭✭Comic Book Guy


    Hi guys. I'm 5 weeks into the P&D 18 week marathon plan. I just have a quick question or looking for feedback from people who have previously used the plan.
    There are a couple of long weekend runs left in the plan that involve 12 and 14 miles done at marathon pace. Are these distances and paces in a long run a bit on the excessive side? I'm just asking from the point of view of accumulated tiredness and recovery.

    Thanks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 953 ✭✭✭Unknownability


    ittakestwo wrote: »
    For non elite runners its all about weekly mileage. The more the better, After 3 failed marathons where I could not run it all I got the advice my peak of 60km a week was not enough to get me to run it all ( although some getaway with that amount). I upped to peak at 90 km in training and then was able to run one all.

    Studies have shown the correlation between marathon times and weekly millage is irrefutable.

    In all 3 marathons where I could only get to c.30km before I had to start walking, my PB marathon time was 3.55. when I upped the weekly millage I ran a 3.01 in 2017.

    That's incredible did you go from 355 to 301 in the space of one marathon¿


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,686 ✭✭✭ittakestwo


    That's incredible did you go from 355 to 301 in the space of one marathon¿

    Have only done Dublin. 3.55 was my PB before 3.01. But the previous marathon had been 4.35 before the 3.01.

    Given my 10k time a 3hr marathon seemed possible but on the day the wheels kept coming off around 30k mark. The last one I thought If i ran much slower I would be able to run one all but again after running 30km at much slower pace than I should, the wheels came off and came in at 4.35.

    I learned it was not to do with my pace but that my legs were not strong enough to run the marathon. I was not doing enough weekly millage I had to up the weekly millage to be able run one all.

    Not in a club and my intuition was that I should always train on fresh legs and I never ran on consecutive days and this was a big mistake. One of the best training you can do for the marathon is to run on already tired legs from a previous days run. This gets the strength into the legs that you need to be able to run a marathon.

    Those days you go out and your legs feel wrecked from the previous weeks running, a first time marathon trainer might think there is noway they can run a marathon but those days are the best training days you can do for the marathon. They are the ones where you are getting strength into your legs. your body recognize repetition. If you are using your legs a lot more your body recognize this and will make them stronger to cater for the extra stress you are putting the under. If you get to this state its a sign that training is going very well.


  • Users Awaiting Email Confirmation Posts: 1,105 ✭✭✭Limpy


    Hi guys. I'm 5 weeks into the P&D 18 week marathon plan. I just have a quick question or looking for feedback from people who have previously used the plan.
    There are a couple of long weekend runs left in the plan that involve 12 and 14 miles done at marathon pace. Are these distances and paces in a long run a bit on the excessive side? I'm just asking from the point of view of accumulated tiredness and recovery.

    Thanks

    Just go for it. If you try and it works out then you will get a confidance boost. It will give you belief for the big day, because you will doubt that you can sustain it for 26.2.

    If you can't hit the splits then re adjust your target. Trust the plan if your meeting your targets.

    Good luck.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,250 ✭✭✭coogy


    Younganne wrote: »
    That's a fantastic read on the Central Governor which also has links to other great articles.

    Thanks for sharing Denis



    Yes, only just got round to reading that article now, very interesting read!! Thanks D!


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,314 ✭✭✭Bluesquare


    coogy wrote: »
    Yes, only just got round to reading that article now, very interesting read!! Thanks D!

    Agreed - great article thanks .Sent to my training group in club - lots of great discussions after


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,250 ✭✭✭coogy


    So, now the Waves have been released, how's everyone feeling about their goal times?

    I'm in Wave 2 but will wait until a bit closer to DCM before deciding on a strategy. Heading out somewhere between the 3:30 and 3:40 pacers might be he way to go.


  • Registered Users Posts: 735 ✭✭✭Treviso


    I got Wave 1 even though I put 3.30 down as my goal time. I'll drop back to wave 2 and go with the 3.30 pacers. I'm not disciplined enough to pace myself for the whole thing.

    Will leave them go ahead for the 1st 7 miles and try to reel them back slowly. No idea how it will go seeing as it's my first marathon but training is going well so far. Charleville at the weekend will be a good yardstick.

    Still unsure as to whether I'll be able to get that time as I'll be going into the unknown and not sure if the endurance is strong enough for the full 26.2 at that pace


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 397 ✭✭Rossi7


    Same boat as yourself Treviso, Wave 1. I'll hang at the back of it and head out and pace myself rather than drop down a wave and rely on the Pacers


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 137 ✭✭Fiftyplus


    Same as you Treviso. 3.30 aim but put in Wave 1. Same last year but I skipped the barrier and went into the pen for Wave 2 and ran with 3.30 pacers. Hopefully do the same again.


  • Registered Users Posts: 498 ✭✭Sheep1978


    Fiftyplus wrote: »
    Same as you Treviso. 3.30 aim but put in Wave 1. Same last year but I skipped the barrier and went into the pen for Wave 2 and ran with 3.30 pacers. Hopefully do the same again.

    you don;t need to skip any barriers. You can drop down waves no problem


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,489 ✭✭✭✭Murph_D


    Rossi7 wrote: »
    Same boat as yourself Treviso, Wave 1. I'll hang at the back of it and head out and pace myself rather than drop down a wave and rely on the Pacers

    The 3:30 pacers will certainly run an even pace and certainly be as close to 3:30 as you would hope. DCM pacer quality is on a different plane compared to other races. Nothing wrong with pacing yourself of course - many of us prefer that - but bear in mind. A good pace team takes a lot of the anxiety out of the equation if you’re going for a time and are prepared to trust.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 397 ✭✭Rossi7


    Murph_D wrote: »
    Rossi7 wrote: »
    Same boat as yourself Treviso, Wave 1. I'll hang at the back of it and head out and pace myself rather than drop down a wave and rely on the Pacers

    The 3:30 pacers will certainly run an even pace and certainly be as close to 3:30 as you would hope. DCM pacer quality is on a different plane compared to other races. Nothing wrong with pacing yourself of course - many of us prefer that - but bear in mind. A good pace team takes a lot of the anxiety out of the equation if you’re going for a time and are prepared to trust.
    Oh I'm not for one minute doubting the ability of the pacers, more my ability. If the wheels come off for myself on the day I know it was my own doing.


  • Registered Users Posts: 601 ✭✭✭Slow_Runner


    Rossi7 wrote: »
    Murph_D wrote: »
    Rossi7 wrote: »
    Same boat as yourself Treviso, Wave 1. I'll hang at the back of it and head out and pace myself rather than drop down a wave and rely on the Pacers

    The 3:30 pacers will certainly run an even pace and certainly be as close to 3:30 as you would hope. DCM pacer quality is on a different plane compared to other races. Nothing wrong with pacing yourself of course - many of us prefer that - but bear in mind. A good pace team takes a lot of the anxiety out of the equation if you’re going for a time and are prepared to trust.
    Oh I'm not for one minute doubting the ability of the pacers, more my ability. If the wheels come off for myself on the day I know it was my own doing.
    I find the danger with pacers is you try to stick with them from the start and keep pace when your body is not able thus tiring you out. During the marathon you will have ups and downs and your pace should reflect this, somewhere like Dublin with a hilly(ish) first half you need to take it easy for the 1st 12-14 miles. Best bet is to use them as a visual guide to where the pace is at, better to be 1-2 minutes behind at the halfway point and slowly try to reel them in for the 2nd half - good to have a target!


  • Registered Users Posts: 351 ✭✭boydkev


    I find the danger with pacers is you try to stick with them from the start and keep pace when your body is not able thus tiring you out. During the marathon you will have ups and downs and your pace should reflect this, somewhere like Dublin with a hilly(ish) first half you need to take it easy for the 1st 12-14 miles. Best bet is to use them as a visual guide to where the pace is at, better to be 1-2 minutes behind at the halfway point and slowly try to reel them in for the 2nd half - good to have a target!

    I was thinking of doing this and start behind the pacers and just tail them especially when the group running with them will be very big for the first half.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Regional East Moderators Posts: 18,511 CMod ✭✭✭✭The Black Oil


    In taper with the meno plan and in wave 2 for DCM. Hoping for 3:45, starting with the 3:50 pacers. My question is to what extent can you 'call upon' MP you've done in training in the race, or more precisely, towards the end stage of the race? Keeping in mind fatigue, trying to sensible, respecting the distance, etc. Does it seem feasible to pick it up, say after mile 20/21 or so? I don't mean going crazy or beyond MP. Never felt I've fully emptied the tank, so far. Not sure where the danger zone is...ish.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,807 ✭✭✭skyblue46


    In taper with the meno plan and in wave 2 for DCM. Hoping for 3:45, starting with the 3:50 pacers. My question is to what extent can you 'call upon' MP you've done in training in the race, or more precisely, towards the end stage of the race? Keeping in mind fatigue, trying to sensible, respecting the distance, etc. Does it seem feasible to pick it up, say after mile 20/21 or so? I don't mean going crazy or beyond MP. Never felt I've fully emptied the tank, so far. Not sure where the danger zone is...ish.

    To an extent you have to listen to your body. It'll be sending signals. Listen to them. It is definitely possible to pick it up at miles 21/22. My fastest miles last year were after mile 20. Trust your training.

    I'd strongly agree with a point made above about using pace group as a target. I didn't see the pace group I was intending to finish near until about mile 15 when you turn left off Fortfield Road towards Terenure College. They were at the end of the long straight entering Terenure Village. From there to the end they were my focus...just to gradually reel them in without being reckless.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,250 ✭✭✭coogy


    skyblue46 wrote: »
    To an extent you have to listen to your body. It'll be sending signals. Listen to them. It is definitely possible to pick it up at miles 21/22. My fastest miles last year were after mile 20. Trust your training.

    I'd strongly agree with a point made above about using pace group as a target. I didn't see the pace group I was intending to finish near until about mile 15 when you turn left off Fortfield Road towards Terenure College. They were at the end of the long straight entering Terenure Village. From there to the end they were my focus...just to gradually reel them in without being reckless.


    S, which pace group are you referring to, was it the 3:20 group?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 187 ✭✭Hedgehoggy


    In taper with the meno plan and in wave 2 for DCM. Hoping for 3:45, starting with the 3:50 pacers. My question is to what extent can you 'call upon' MP you've done in training in the race, or more precisely, towards the end stage of the race? Keeping in mind fatigue, trying to sensible, respecting the distance, etc. Does it seem feasible to pick it up, say after mile 20/21 or so? I don't mean going crazy or beyond MP. Never felt I've fully emptied the tank, so far. Not sure where the danger zone is...ish.

    [QUOTE=To an extent you have to listen to your body. It'll be sending signals. Listen to them. It is definitely possible to pick it up at miles 21/22. My fastest miles last year were after mile 20. Trust your training.

    I'd strongly agree with a point made above about using pace group as a target. I didn't see the pace group I was intending to finish near until about mile 15 when you turn left off Fortfield Road towards Terenure College. They were at the end of the long straight entering Terenure Village. From there to the end they were my focus...just to gradually reel them in without being reckless.[/QUOTE]


    Hoping for something similar myself - starting ahead of 3.40 pace group with the aim of pushing on later. Thinking 8.15 pace for the first 10k and then upping it gradually after 8 miles - 18m mile. After that it'll just depend on what's in the tank I suppose. Reaching 3.30 will be a major challenge - part of me is wondering if I should throw caution to the wind and put it on the line - If I blow up I blow up - but at least I'll have given it a shot!


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,807 ✭✭✭skyblue46


    coogy wrote: »
    S, which pace group are you referring to, was it the 3:20 group?

    It was. But the point holds whichever pace group is in question. 3:20 was my target time. I waited until I was practically the last person in the pen before setting off. I was still in most of my 'stay warm' clothes when the gun went off. I didn't want the distraction of the pace group. I never saw them until I was outside Bushy Park. I was intent on running my own race. I can see however that others would prefer the comfort blanket of keeping them in sight.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,191 ✭✭✭healy1835


    FWIW I ran with the 3:20 pace group a couple of years back. It's a pretty big group and I just plonked myself in the middle of it. Coasted along, well protected from the elements, until about Rathgar where I moved a bit ahead of the bigger group. I possibly would have broke 3:20 that day anyway, but the pace group just took all thinking out of my hands and really relaxed me. If I had to chase down a balloon or keep it in my sights then I'm not sure how I might have fared......but as Skyblue says, it's a decision that's purely individual.


  • Registered Users Posts: 507 ✭✭✭runnerholic


    healy1835 wrote: »
    FWIW I ran with the 3:20 pace group a couple of years back. It's a pretty big group and I just plonked myself in the middle of it. Coasted along, well protected from the elements, until about Rathgar where I moved a bit ahead of the bigger group. I possibly would have broke 3:20 that day anyway, but the pace group just took all thinking out of my hands and really relaxed me. If I had to chase down a balloon or keep it in my sights then I'm not sure how I might have fared......but as Skyblue says, it's a decision that's purely individual.

    This is my dilemma atm, whether to avail of the shelter provided by the pacer group or to pace my own race which would involve running alone and battling the elements.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,015 ✭✭✭jake1970


    In taper with the meno plan and in wave 2 for DCM. Hoping for 3:45, starting with the 3:50 pacers. My question is to what extent can you 'call upon' MP you've done in training in the race, or more precisely, towards the end stage of the race? Keeping in mind fatigue, trying to sensible, respecting the distance, etc. Does it seem feasible to pick it up, say after mile 20/21 or so? I don't mean going crazy or beyond MP. Never felt I've fully emptied the tank, so far. Not sure where the danger zone is...ish.



    In 2015 I had a similar experience as healy1835 when I ran with the 3:20 pace group until mile 19 when I pushed on a little and finished in a time of 3:18:30. As it was my first marathon I liked the safety of the pace group but I did take a bit of a risk by pushing on at mile 19 as it was a run into the unknown but it all worked out in the end.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,476 ✭✭✭Comic Book Guy


    skyblue46 wrote: »
    It was. But the point holds whichever pace group is in question. 3:20 was my target time. I waited until I was practically the last person in the pen before setting off. I was still in most of my 'stay warm' clothes when the gun went off. I didn't want the distraction of the pace group. I never saw them until I was outside Bushy Park. I was intent on running my own race. I can see however that others would prefer the comfort blanket of keeping them in sight.

    Thanks for that S, just wondering did you find it very stop start to maintain you pace in the first 7 miles starting at the back of the wave? Like did you find yourself overly blocked in (I know you would starting in the middle of the wave too!).
    I'm kinda in between what you did and leave it a minute or 2 after gun and starting at back of wave 1 or maybe even stay where I am and move up and go at the head of wave 2.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 735 ✭✭✭Treviso


    Thanks for that S, just wondering did you find it very stop start to maintain you pace in the first 7 miles starting at the back of the wave? Like did you find yourself overly blocked in (I know you would starting in the middle of the wave too!).
    I'm kinda in between what you did and leave it a minute or 2 after gun and starting at back of wave 1 or maybe even stay where I am and move up and go at the head of wave 2.

    Might see you at the back of Wave 1 then J. My plan at the moment is to wait at the back of wave 1 and go with the head of wave 2 with 3.30 pacers. Will leave them go a bit for the first 7 miles and then try to slowly catch them


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,008 ✭✭✭Lambay island


    Treviso wrote: »
    Might see you at the back of Wave 1 then J. My plan at the moment is to wait at the back of wave 1 and go with the head of wave 2 with 3.30 pacers. Will leave them go a bit for the first 7 miles and then try to slowly catch them

    My plan is similar to yours regards the 7 or 8 miles except im starting in wave 2 so will place myself at back of pacers i think


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,807 ✭✭✭skyblue46


    Thanks for that S, just wondering did you find it very stop start to maintain you pace in the first 7 miles starting at the back of the wave? Like did you find yourself overly blocked in (I know you would starting in the middle of the wave too!).
    I'm kinda in between what you did and leave it a minute or 2 after gun and starting at back of wave 1 or maybe even stay where I am and move up and go at the head of wave 2.

    I had no real problems with congestion. That being said I was super relaxed on the day in relation to pace. I just went with the flow. I considered every occasion that I was going slower than planned was more energy being saved for the crunch part of the day. I wasn't running to a pace band so that stress wasn't there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,686 ✭✭✭ittakestwo


    skyblue46 wrote: »
    I had no real problems with congestion. That being said I was super relaxed on the day in relation to pace. I just went with the flow. I considered every occasion that I was going slower than planned was more energy being saved for the crunch part of the day. I wasn't running to a pace band so that stress wasn't there.

    Super relaxed on the day always helps with a pb


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,253 ✭✭✭ooter


    training has gone well for me and I reckon i'm definitely in 3:20 shape, but my PB is 3:14 and i'm wondering whether to have a crack at it.
    healy1835 wrote: »
    but the pace group just took all thinking out of my hands and really relaxed me.
    this is my thinking and my plan for the first half of the race, just go with the flow (3:20 pacers) and don't give it much/any thought, if i'm feeling good at half way kick on and see where it takes me. anyone think this is a good strategy or is it virtually unheard of to run a 6+ minute negative split?
    if there were 3:15 pacers it'd be perfect but unfortunately not. :(


  • Advertisement
Advertisement