Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

2021 Irish Property Market chat - *mod warnings post 1*

Options
1135136138140141352

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 2,000 ✭✭✭Hubertj


    I don't have a subscription so cant see the whole piece but i assume its the subsidiary that has no employees, all the same not a penny in tax is outrageous, Europe's treasure island as they say.

    I think the question should be where will tax be paid on it. If it’s nowhere that’s not good. But if that money goes back to the US I presume some form of tax is paid. It’s like the apple tax case. Tax was always going to be paid, question was where.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,014 ✭✭✭MacronvFrugals


    Hubertj wrote: »
    I think the question should be where will tax be paid on it. If it’s nowhere that’s not good. But if that money goes back to the US I presume some form of tax is paid. It’s like the apple tax case. Tax was always going to be paid, question was where.

    EMC paid no and will pay no tax on that $3.6 billion, facilitated by Ireland.

    They're using EMC International and EMC Information Systems as part of their Double Irish technique, wasn't this loophole supposed to be closed last year i thought.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,014 ✭✭✭MacronvFrugals


    Hotels are flying up in the capital, 17% increase in rooms this year!

    More than 4,000 hotel beds to be completed in Dublin this year
    New beds will increase existing stock in the capital of 24,000 by 17 per cent, according to Mitchell McDermott construction sector report

    https://www.businesspost.ie/houses/more-than-4000-hotel-beds-to-be-completed-in-dublin-this-year-60e22ae0


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,000 ✭✭✭Hubertj


    EMC paid no and will pay no tax on that $3.6 billion, facilitated by Ireland.

    They're using EMC International and EMC Information Systems as part of their Double Irish technique, wasn't this loophole supposed to be closed last year i thought.

    Is that what the article says? It’s behind a paywall.


  • Registered Users Posts: 709 ✭✭✭wowy


    Hubertj wrote: »
    I think the question should be where will tax be paid on it. If it’s nowhere that’s not good. But if that money goes back to the US I presume some form of tax is paid. It’s like the apple tax case. Tax was always going to be paid, question was where.

    Seamus Coffey has been making this point on Twitter about this article, and other articles about US MNCs not paying tax in Ireland/EU but ultimately paying tax in the US.

    https://twitter.com/seamuscoffey/status/1364155669507674112?s=20


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,203 ✭✭✭PropQueries


    fliball123 wrote: »
    If you have a rogue landlord the tenant may lose their deposit, if you have a rogue tenant the landlord could lose a year of rent and money to fix back up their property. The risk for a small landlord now renting a property out is at a point where its not worth it.

    So a landlord with an investment property in e.g. Galway City where rental yields are currently c. 10% is selling up due to the extremely slim chance of a tenant not paying their rent and may lose a years rent (i.e. return).

    Let’s do the maths.

    A landlord in Galway sells his investment property for e.g. €200k. Puts the sales proceeds in the bank and receives 0% or €0 per annum return.

    Or. He keeps his investment property and collects c. 10% or €20,000 per annum.

    Over a ten year period he can generate either €0 (or close to €0) in the bank or €200,000 from continuing to rent his property based on current interest rates and rental yields.

    Even in the zero percent chance a tenant doesn’t pay his rent for e.g. 5 of those 10 years, the landlord is still quids in big time.

    He can also sign up for one of those many government subsidy schemes for landlords (e.g. long term lease agreements etc., i.e. welfare for landlords) and guarantee a similar c.8% to 10% return over the next ten or so years.

    Yes, the landlord pays tax on his rental income just like every other 9 to 5er in Ireland. Tax really isn’t an issue by placing his sales proceeds on deposit as he’s generating little to no income anyway from depositing it in the bank, so tax is obviously not an issue there.

    A landlord selling his property due to the very very slim chance of a tenant not paying their rent for a year is not a very wise investment decision IMO

    Link to Galway rental yields in SBP: https://www.businesspost.ie/commercial/rent-rises-outside-dublin-boosted-gross-yields-to-double-digit-levels-in-2020-81a4b0af


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,445 ✭✭✭fliball123


    So a landlord with an investment property in e.g. Galway City where rental yield are currently c. 10% are selling up due to the extremely slim chance of a tenant not paying their rent and may lose a years rent (i.e. return).

    Let’s go the maths.

    A landlord in Galway sells his investment property for e.g. €200k. Puts the sales proceeds in the bank and received 0% or €0 per annum return.

    Or. He keeps his investment property and collects c. 10% or €20,000 per annum.

    Over a ten year period he can generate either €0 (or close to €0) in the bank or €200,000 from continuing to rent his property based on current interest rates and rental yields.

    Even in the zero percent chance a tenant doesn’t pay his rent for e.g. 5 of those 10 years, the landlord is still quids in big time.

    He can also sign up for one of those many government subsidy schemes for landlords (e.g. long term lease agreements etc., i.e. welfare for landlords) and guarantee a similar c.8% to 10% return over the next ten or so years.

    Yes, the landlord pays tax on his rental income just like every other 9 to 5er in Ireland. Tax really isn’t an issue by placing he proceeds on deposit as he’s generating little to no income anyway from depositing it in the bank, so tax is obviously not an issue there.

    A landlord selling his property due to the very very slim chance of a tenant not paying their rent for a year is not a wise investment decision IMO

    Link to Galway rental yields in SBP: https://www.businesspost.ie/commercial/rent-rises-outside-dublin-boosted-gross-yields-to-double-digit-levels-in-2020-81a4b0af

    The math is done for you already and in bulk, not on your one off opinion as in properties coming up for sale now there are less than half the properties available now for sale than there was this time last year also the amount of sales are down also. So for a good number of years the number of small landlords have been dropping. Surely we would of seen a spike in the amount of properties for sale if your contention was right?

    Also your forgetting pre tax costs - mortgage, insurance and maintenance and then tax costs income tax, PRSI, USC, property tax. that 10% soon dwindles to a point where its not worth it.

    Why would you gamble?

    https://www.thejournal.ie/residential-tenancies-board-difficult-tenants-tom-dunne-4852391-Oct2019/

    Throw in that rents are now capped as well as the changes that now see tenants have all the cards when it comes to disputes its no wonder they are leaving

    https://www.irishtimes.com/life-and-style/homes-and-property/new-to-market/small-private-landlords-are-quitting-in-their-droves-says-seller-of-glenageary-house-1.4089315

    https://www.rte.ie/news/2018/1213/1016879-rent_index/

    https://www.irishtimes.com/business/personal-finance/why-are-landlords-leaving-the-market-in-large-numbers-1.3360363

    https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/small-time-landlords-are-being-forced-out-of-market-37126402.html

    https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/news/tenants-who-stop-paying-rent-can-live-free-for-18-months-30452306.html

    Then throw in the extra protections tenants have been afforded during covid. Its just not worth your while to have 1 or 2 properties


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,203 ✭✭✭PropQueries


    fliball123 wrote: »
    Throw in that rents are now capped as well as the changes that now see tenants have all the cards when it comes to disputes its no wonder they are leaving

    The rents were “capped” at a rent level when rents were at their highest levels in the history of the state.

    And landlords are still allowed to increase rents by 4% per annum I believe. Hardly a punishment on existing landlords and hardly an incentive to sell IMO


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,099 ✭✭✭Browney7


    fliball123 wrote: »
    The math is done for you already and in bulk, not on your one off opinion as in properties coming up for sale now there are less than half the properties available now for sale than there was this time last year also the amount of sales are down also. So for a good number of years the number of small landlords have been dropping.

    Also your forgetting pre tax costs - insurance and maintenance and then tax costs income tax, PRSI, USC, property tax. that 10% soon dwindles to a point where its not worth it.

    Why would you gamble?

    https://www.thejournal.ie/residential-tenancies-board-difficult-tenants-tom-dunne-4852391-Oct2019/

    Throw in that rents are now capped as well as the changes that now see tenants have all the cards when it comes to disputes its no wonder they are leaving

    https://www.irishtimes.com/life-and-style/homes-and-property/new-to-market/small-private-landlords-are-quitting-in-their-droves-says-seller-of-glenageary-house-1.4089315

    https://www.rte.ie/news/2018/1213/1016879-rent_index/

    https://www.irishtimes.com/business/personal-finance/why-are-landlords-leaving-the-market-in-large-numbers-1.3360363

    https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/small-time-landlords-are-being-forced-out-of-market-37126402.html

    https://www.independent.ie/irish-news/news/tenants-who-stop-paying-rent-can-live-free-for-18-months-30452306.html

    Considering landlords have been prohibited from ending tenancies (due to Covid pandemic restrictions) on the grounds of sale for the guts of a year now (with the exception of a few months here and there) it's no surprise the properties available for sale has plummeted. No way of quantifying how many properties that are for sale at any one time are ex rental though


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 271 ✭✭Galwayhurl


    Unrelated question, but what are the commission and other charges that a Real Estate Agent will charge if you're selling a house?


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,445 ✭✭✭fliball123


    The rents were “capped” at a rent level when rents were at their highest levels in the history of the state.

    And landlords are still allowed to increase rents by 4% per annum I believe. Hardly a punishment on existing landlords and hardly an incentive to sell IMO

    I agree but if your looking at that from a landlords point of view it means your stuck at what returns you can get for your property. I am not saying its wrong. I am just saying its one of the many changes that has made small landlords leave.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,445 ✭✭✭fliball123


    Browney7 wrote: »
    Considering landlords have been prohibited from ending tenancies (due to Covid pandemic restrictions) on the grounds of sale for the guts of a year now (with the exception of a few months here and there) it's no surprise the properties available for sale has plummeted. No way of quantifying how many properties that are for sale at any one time are ex rental though

    Yeah good point but there is the option of putting a property up for sale with a tenant in situ these have not risen over that period either. What we can say for certainty is small landlords have been leaving the market pre covid.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,445 ✭✭✭fliball123


    Great news, hopefully the 657,076 on PUP will walk into these jobs when they eventually get the bullet and we can go back to our normal booming economy again.

    What ever just pointing out its not all doom and gloom and the fact that a previous poster tried to point out that the creation of 2k jobs was a mere "one swallow does not make a summer" scenario so as can be seen by the links its a gulp of swallows. Also I reckon a high % of those on PUP will walk back into the job they had precovid unless you have evidence to the contrary?


  • Registered Users Posts: 220 ✭✭thefridge2006


    fliball123 wrote: »
    What ever just pointing out its not all doom and gloom and the fact that a previous poster tried to point out that the creation of 2k jobs was a mere "one swallow does not make a summer" scenario so as can be seen by the links its a gulp of swallows. Also I reckon a high % of those on PUP will walk back into the job they had precovid.


    It is absolutely doom and gloom Fliball. 657,076 people on PUP alone, not to mention other subsidies.... We will be a very long time recovering from this mess and i have a feeling we've seen nothing yet.

    I love your optimism but we are fu£ked


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,445 ✭✭✭fliball123


    It is absolutely doom and gloom Fliball. 657,076 people on PUP alone, not to mention other subsidies.... We will be a very long time recovering from this mess and i have a feeling we've seen nothing yet.

    I love your optimism but we are fu£ked

    The 657076 have had their places of business (where they worked) closed (in a lot of cases this is temporary). Have you evidence that these places will remain closed? We borrowed 10 times as much in 2008 tried austerity it did not work I cant see a government doing it now with 10% more debt and the existing debt refinanced at a lower rate meaning the repayments will be more or less the same as what we were paying back after the last crash. Just think of how much better off our economy will be when those 657076 people are no longer taking money from the economy but paying tax into it? It also begs the question why others as in the links I posted seem to think Ireland Inc is a good place to set up new jobs.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,203 ✭✭✭PropQueries


    fliball123 wrote: »
    We borrowed 10 times as much in 2008 tried austerity it did not work I cant see a government doing it now with 10% more debt and the existing debt refinanced at a lower rate meaning the repayments will be more or less the same as what we were paying back after the last crash.

    Our refinancing costs could change much faster than many people assume. And god knows what refinancing rates will be in ten years time. I’m expecting significant tax rises on everything from incomes to property to pensions to inheritance taxes etc. and major cuts to our local services in the very near future. This wasn’t free money.

    According to the Irish Independent today:

    “Borrowing costs for Ireland start to rise as investors expect ‘reflation’. the yield on Irish 10-year government bonds has shifted back into positive numbers, meaning the cost of debt looks set to rise next time Ireland taps the markets.”

    Link to Irish Independent here: https://independent.ie/business/irish/borrowing-costs-for-ireland-start-to-rise-as-investors-expect-reflation-40121273.html


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,767 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Hubertj wrote: »
    I think the question should be where will tax be paid on it. If it’s nowhere that’s not good. But if that money goes back to the US I presume some form of tax is paid. It’s like the apple tax case. Tax was always going to be paid, question was where.

    Tax was not paid on the Apple money, it sat in a Bank's computer in NY in an account marked foreign, which meant it hadn't been brought into the US. Apple were waiting and angling for a tax holiday for years and then of course trump delivered.
    Why Trump's Potential $500 Billion Tax Holiday Could Make Apple and Microsoft Huge Winners
    There could be a major windfall for Fortune 500 companies.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 220 ✭✭thefridge2006


    fliball123 wrote: »
    The 657076 have had their places of business (where they worked) closed (in a lot of cases this is temporary). Have you evidence that these places will remain closed?

    Have you evidence that they will open their doors again once the support is stopped? I would imagine some will reopen but most will never be seen again or wont last a year.

    We borrowed 10 times as much in 2008 tried austerity it did not work I cant see a government doing it now with 10% more debt and the existing debt refinanced at a lower rate meaning the repayments will be more or less the same as what we were paying back after the last crash.

    Borrowing costs for Ireland start to rise as investors expect ‘reflation’
    https://www.independent.ie/business/irish/borrowing-costs-for-ireland-start-to-rise-as-investors-expect-reflation-40121273.html


    Just think of how much better off our economy will be when those 657076 people are no longer taking money from the economy but paying tax into it? It also begs the question why others as in the links I posted seem to think Ireland Inc is a good place to set up new jobs.

    TAX loopholes. nothing to do with our education, language or our craic, like some would have you believe. Its financial. The MNC would move to the next crowd in a heartbeat if they were getting a better deal


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,445 ✭✭✭fliball123


    Have you evidence that they will open their doors again once the support is stopped? I would imagine some will reopen but most will never be seen again or wont last a year.

    We borrowed 10 times as much in 2008 tried austerity it did not work I cant see a government doing it now with 10% more debt and the existing debt refinanced at a lower rate meaning the repayments will be more or less the same as what we were paying back after the last crash.

    Borrowing costs for Ireland start to rise as investors expect ‘reflation’
    https://www.independent.ie/business/irish/borrowing-costs-for-ireland-start-to-rise-as-investors-expect-reflation-40121273.html


    Just think of how much better off our economy will be when those 657076 people are no longer taking money from the economy but paying tax into it? It also begs the question why others as in the links I posted seem to think Ireland Inc is a good place to set up new jobs.

    TAX loopholes. nothing to do with our education, language or our craic, like some would have you believe. Its financial. The MNC would move to the next crowd in a heartbeat if they were getting a better deal

    Well we will have to wait and see where the 600k+ on PUP go when we open up so you cant just write them off either as long term on the dole. The country has closed down, companies have been forced to close you only have to look at the lobby groups in Ireland how they are putting pressure on the government to open back up. Surely a large % will be back working what they were doing before

    What better deal are they getting the MNCs are already located here so it wont impact on corpo tax and will have to pay employee tax on each employee as well as the wage. Where is the loophole. Are there tax loop holes when it comes to paying employees in this country (could be wrong on this)

    So the 600k jobs created in the 5 years building up to 2020 and the 16k created in 2020 is all down to tax loop holes even do a lot of the companies had an existing base here in the country?


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,368 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    I haven't been following the mood recently. What's the feeling out there with prices now and the market in general. The expected drop in prices hasn't really happened. I guess there have to be tailoring off of central bank money at some stage which will make an effect.


    I think since there is a lag that the price drops are going to be even worse than they would have been. But who knows really.
    I certainly wouldnt be buying in the next year or so anyway.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,513 ✭✭✭Villa05


    awec wrote:
    In the same article, I think the Central Bank are suggesting their own analysis is that without their rules prices could be up to 25% higher than they are now.

    I think politicians are intelligent and well educated, so they are well aware of the consequences of their actions.

    The shared equity scheme is a work around to the central bank rules and this will inevitably push up prices and rents as has been warned by the multiple state advisers

    Considering the state is the largest rent payer in the country by considerable distance, one would have to ask why a government is pursuing policies that increases the burden on the state and its citizens

    Is this corruption, cronyism, treason? What is it?

    I'm ruling out incompetence for a number of reasons
    The people pushing these policies are intelligent and well educated
    These polices have been pursued before and found to be inflationary and of very help and extremely high risk
    All independent advise has been negative to the scheme


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,203 ✭✭✭PropQueries


    This is a prime example of how the Government's failed housing policy eventually feeds into middle class areas where the residents probably believed they were fairly immune to most of the resultant consequences.

    According to The Echo today:

    "Plans for a homeless hub for families to be located at the former Cappaghmore Nursing Home in Clondalkin, has been blasted by residents who cite lack of communication with the council. The former nursing home consists of two houses, in an estate which normally has four-bed homes."

    From looking at the estate on Google maps, it looks like a fairly well heeled estate. Obviously not compared to some areas (e.g. Dalkey etc.), but it looks like it's definitely a well established middle class estate.

    And similar practices are happening all over the city in middle class estates.

    Back in 2018, in Clontarf, it was reported: "As much as €1.3 million of taxpayers’ money has been spent on renovations on a pair of homes – bought for almost €2 million – to house homeless families in Dublin.

    The homes, which were sold for €194,000 above the original asking price of €1.8million, had together been used as a B&B in upmarket Clontarf.

    The properties in St Lawrence Road were purchased by the State’s Housing Agency on behalf of Dublin City Council last year to provide accommodation for 13 families who are homeless and in commercial hotels."

    Link to article in The Echo today on Clondalkin nursing home to be used as homeless hub here: https://echo.ie/clondalkin/article/homeless-hub-for-small-families-planned-for-former-nursing-home

    Link to article on St. Laurence's Road, Clontarf, in 2018: https://extra.ie/2018/06/11/news/irish-news/homeless-hub-dublin

    Just to add to this and genuine question. What's the story with planning permission for converting e.g. former nursing homes, B&B's etc. in existing residential estates into family hubs etc.? Seems like planning permission should be required as it's a fairly big change of use IMO

    But, then again, some posters here believe if you own a property you should be able to do whatever you like with it :)


  • Moderators, Education Moderators, Technology & Internet Moderators Posts: 35,055 Mod ✭✭✭✭AlmightyCushion


    Villa05 wrote: »
    I think politicians are intelligent and well educated, so they are well aware of the consequences of their actions.

    The shared equity scheme is a work around to the central bank rules and this will inevitably push up prices and rents as has been warned by the multiple state advisers

    Considering the state is the largest rent payer in the country by considerable distance, one would have to ask why a government is pursuing policies that increases the burden on the state and its citizens

    Is this corruption, cronyism, treason? What is it?

    I'm ruling out incompetence for a number of reasons
    The people pushing these policies are intelligent and well educated
    These polices have been pursued before and found to be inflationary and of very help and extremely high risk
    All independent advise has been negative to the scheme

    They do it because to some people it looks good and it helps. Some one who can only afford a place that costs €300k will now be able to buy a place for €400k. We know that it will lead to price increases but to some people it looks like the government is helping them buy a place. It's the same with the Help to Buy. It leads to price increases but people see they are able to get 30k from the state to buy so it looks good.


  • Registered Users Posts: 19,706 ✭✭✭✭Cyrus


    This is a prime example of how the Government's failed housing policy eventually feeds into middle class areas where the residents probably believed they were fairly immune to most of the resultant consequences.

    According to The Echo today:

    "Plans for a homeless hub for families to be located at the former Cappaghmore Nursing Home in Clondalkin, has been blasted by residents who cite lack of communication with the council. The former nursing home consists of two houses, in an estate which normally has four-bed homes."

    From looking at the estate on Google maps, it looks like a fairly well heeled estate. Obviously not compared to some areas (e.g. Dalkey etc.), but it looks like it's definitely a well established middle class estate.

    And similar practices are happening all over the city in middle class estates.

    Back in 2018, in Clontarf, it was reported: "As much as €1.3 million of taxpayers’ money has been spent on renovations on a pair of homes – bought for almost €2 million – to house homeless families in Dublin.

    The homes, which were sold for €194,000 above the original asking price of €1.8million, had together been used as a B&B in upmarket Clontarf.

    The properties in St Lawrence Road were purchased by the State’s Housing Agency on behalf of Dublin City Council last year to provide accommodation for 13 families who are homeless and in commercial hotels."

    Link to article in The Echo today on Clondalkin nursing home to be used as homeless hub here: https://echo.ie/clondalkin/article/homeless-hub-for-small-families-planned-for-former-nursing-home

    Link to article on St. Laurence's Road, Clontarf, in 2018: https://extra.ie/2018/06/11/news/irish-news/homeless-hub-dublin

    you used well heeled and clondalkin in the same sentence, thats a first i think.


  • Registered Users Posts: 128 ✭✭Balluba


    David McWilliam’s Ireland S1 episode 1 was on Virgin Media last night. He discussed Irish housing issues and the current property bubble.
    It was informative and worth a watch.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,368 ✭✭✭JimmyVik


    Balluba wrote: »
    David McWilliam’s Ireland S1 episode 1 was on Virgin Media last night. He discussed Irish housing issues and the current property bubble.
    It was informative and worth a watch.


    Just watched it.
    He is right. It is panic buying alright.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 4,513 ✭✭✭Villa05


    Did he describe it as a bubble?
    He had been careful up to recently about commenting on the property market
    I got the impression, he got a backlash for his commentary prior to the previous bust


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement