Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

M11/N11 - M50 (J4) to Coyne's Cross (J14) [options published]

1246725

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,628 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Public consultation meeting in the Glenview hotel next Tuesday 11th December 12-8pm for public to discuss the proposed plans with engineers.

    Full website will go live on same date.
    https://m11n11.ie/


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,459 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    jvan wrote: »
    Public consultation meeting in the Glenview hotel next Tuesday 11th December 12-8pm for public to discuss the proposed plans with engineers.

    Full website will go live on same date.
    https://m11n11.ie/
    Thank you for the update. Great to see the ball rolling here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,628 ✭✭✭prunudo


    I'll head along and post up what it was all about. The fact Arup are only there since November I'm not really sure what to expect.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,650 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    Sorry but the real cause of the problems is a substandard road.

    PT is a nonsense argument. Only after roads are properly built should there be PT options discussed.

    There’s no logic in that. Proper PT may require no road at all. Rail could be built. A lane could be scarified, make traffic worse and force people into busses.

    Cycle lanes built instead of roads. There’s plenty of alternatives


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,084 ✭✭✭BeepBeep67


    jvan wrote: »
    There's nowhere near enough room for 3 lanes each way. As it is the hard shoulders are narrower than normal.

    I would think that 3 lanes heading North would be more of a priority if possible with minimal disruption.

    Shuttle train from Wicklow Town to Greystones to match the Dart or secure land opposite Shoreline as a large park and ride.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,628 ✭✭✭prunudo


    BeepBeep67 wrote: »
    I would think that 3 lanes heading North would be more of a priority if possible with minimal disruption.

    Shuttle train from Wicklow Town to Greystones to match the Dart or secure land opposite Shoreline as a large park and ride.

    I used to think along those lines, more roads, more lanes, the better.
    As much as I hate saying it, if they can find room for an extra lane I now believe it should be for a bus lane and even a segerated cycle route too. There is no point having buses stuck in the traffic along with all the other commuters.
    If they are serious about people ditching the private car then this has to be done.
    I would also like this buslane to be 24hr, not a de facto 3rd lane in off peak times. It should also have a 60kph speed limit so you don't have Wexford bus doing 100kph past stationary traffic.

    The n11 route is being choked by traffic, with more and more housing coming on stream each year. Unfortunately there doesnt seem to be any interest in updating the trainline so this leaves buses as the only other commuting option.


  • Registered Users Posts: 436 ✭✭incentsitive


    What's being done?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,628 ✭✭✭prunudo


    What's being done?

    Not sure yet, improvements of n11 between j4 to j14.
    Most likely will include 3 lane to j7 and then closing non numbered junctions and entrances beyond that, possibly upgrading to motorway.

    There's a meeting in the Glenview hotel next Tuesday to give the public the chance to discuss it with the engineers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,483 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    jvan wrote: »
    I used to think along those lines, more roads, more lanes, the better.
    As much as I hate saying it, if they can find room for an extra lane I now believe it should be for a bus lane and even a segerated cycle route too. There is no point having buses stuck in the traffic along with all the other commuters.
    If they are serious about people ditching the private car then this has to be done.
    I would also like this buslane to be 24hr, not a de facto 3rd lane in off peak times. It should also have a 60kph speed limit so you don't have Wexford bus doing 100kph past stationary traffic.

    The n11 route is being choked by traffic, with more and more housing coming on stream each year. Unfortunately there doesnt seem to be any interest in updating the trainline so this leaves buses as the only other commuting option.
    They should do this now, changing the hard shoulders. Needs a massive increase in bus capacity, and Park and Rides. But both could be done relatively quick and in the scheme of things cheaply.

    Capacity issues on the BE services, and the success of Wexford Bus (enough to expand with the Wicklow Bus) shows there is already demand there.


  • Registered Users Posts: 436 ✭✭incentsitive


    1 lane should be a bus lane on every motorway close to the cities, especially where they have 3 lanes.
    I would also think 1 lane should be high-occupancy. Cars with 4 people, but that's very difficult to police and no way would it work in Ireland given the bus lanes are always already full with cars!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,428 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    1 lane should be a bus lane on every motorway close to the cities, especially where they have 3 lanes.
    I would also think 1 lane should be high-occupancy. Cars with 4 people, but that's very difficult to police and no way would it work in Ireland given the bus lanes are always already full with cars!

    Be careful what you wish for - google the M4 bus lane near London and you’ll see how they can cause more problems.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,901 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    1 lane should be a bus lane on every motorway close to the cities, especially where they have 3 lanes.
    I would also think 1 lane should be high-occupancy. Cars with 4 people, but that's very difficult to police and no way would it work in Ireland given the bus lanes are always already full with cars!

    So where you need most motorway lanes you want to remove 1 motorway lane and replace that lane with a bus lane?

    Or you want to add a bus lane to existing lanes?

    I can imagine people being very angry at the notion of the first proposal.

    Anyone remember driver reaction to the bus lane on the N32? And totally right.

    Motorways should not have bus lanes, only hard shoulders.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,650 ✭✭✭✭ted1


    So where you need most motorway lanes you want to remove 1 motorway lane and replace that lane with a bus lane?

    Or you want to add a bus lane to existing lanes?

    I can imagine people being very angry at the notion of the first proposal.

    Anyone remember driver reaction to the bus lane on the N32? And totally right.

    Motorways should not have bus lanes, only hard shoulders.
    The days of the private motor car are numbered. They are an inefficient use of land and resources.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,628 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Marcusm wrote: »
    Be careful what you wish for - google the M4 bus lane near London and you’ll see how they can cause more problems.

    I often heard it being used as an example against bus lanes on motorways. What was/is the problem with it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,483 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    Anyone remember driver reaction to the bus lane on the N32? And totally right.

    Motorways should not have bus lanes, only hard shoulders.
    The issue with the N32 was that there wasn't a bus route using it, not that there was a bus lane.

    If it has to stay a national primary to facilitate the bus lane instead of hard shoulder, so be it.

    btw, further in the N11, from Loughlinstown to Foxrock, it was hard shoulder before it was bus lane (that's why it's 24 hours on that stretch). So it can be done, and can work well.

    I should clarify, I currently commute the N/M11 by car, even on the days I do the second half by bike. I'm doing it long enough to remember when the widening, and then the M50 link and aux lane were going to "fix" the traffic. It hasn't and won't work. More roads isn't the solution to "traffic". I really want park and rides and express services buses to link with the City Centre/ Sandyford/ Luas/ Dart so I can just drive to near the N11 and pick them up. Or use the Park and Rides, and then get on the bike to any of the aforementioned places.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,459 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    There's a deeper issue here, in that south of Bray there is continued expansion and development and you have a seriously constained N11 (especially at Kilmacanogue and Glen of the Downs - neither of which will be sorted by this scheme) and a single track railway at Bray Head which cannot be widened cheaply.

    The N11 is really the only place you could put a bus lane - it could be quite effective if it either linked into the N11 bus lane north of Bray or else linked to the Luas/Metrolink in future for further transport.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,483 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    marno21 wrote: »
    The N11 is really the only place you could put a bus lane - it could be quite effective if it either linked into the N11 bus lane north of Bray or else linked to the Luas/Metrolink in future for further transport.
    Every bus wouldn't have to go to every destination, if a proper frequency. The potential links are there now...

    xxxa Sandyford - Business Park(s) and Luas Green Line
    xxxb City Centre - Cherrywood + Green Line + N11 Dublin Bus
    xxxc Dun Laoghaire - Cherrywood + N11 Dublin Bus + Dart


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,628 ✭✭✭prunudo


    marno21 wrote: »
    There's a deeper issue here, in that south of Bray there is continued expansion and development and you have a seriously constained N11 (especially at Kilmacanogue and Glen of the Downs - neither of which will be sorted by this scheme) and a single track railway at Bray Head which cannot be widened cheaply.

    The N11 is really the only place you could put a bus lane - it could be quite effective if it either linked into the N11 bus lane north of Bray or else linked to the Luas/Metrolink in future for further transport.

    Not covered by this project but there is also a case for road improvements leaving the north of Greystones. All the new estates and apartments in the town are going to cause chronic grid lock in the mornings on the single lane road up windgates. The traffic is all funnelled into the southern cross roundabout which has its own issues with traffic being backed up because of the Bray schools traffic.
    This road really needs a bus lane too.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,459 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    jvan wrote: »
    Not covered by this project but there is also a case for road improvements leaving the north of Greystones. All the new estates and apartments in the town are going to cause chronic grid lock in the mornings on the single lane road up windgates. The traffic is all funnelled into the southern cross roundabout which has its own issues with traffic being backed up because of the Bray schools traffic.
    This road really needs a bus lane too.
    Sponge Bob on SSC was proposing a new link from north of Kilmac to north of Greystones. Sure it would cost a pretty penny but would negate the need to widen the N11 around Kilmac and through the Glen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,104 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    marno21 wrote: »
    Sponge Bob on SSC was proposing a new link from north of Kilmac to north of Greystones. Sure it would cost a pretty penny but would negate the need to widen the N11 around Kilmac and through the Glen.

    There is a Greystones Northern Access Road on the long term WCC development plan, I think it is planned to connect to J9 on the N11. It's not imminent though and I expect there will be some pushback against it as it ploughs through a fairly scenic area.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,628 ✭✭✭prunudo


    loyatemu wrote: »
    There is a Greystones Northern Access Road on the long term WCC development plan, I think it is planned to connect to J9 on the N11. It's not imminent though and I expect there will be some pushback against it as it ploughs through a fairly scenic area.

    If they build houses in the lands behind the schools and opposite the cemetry its only a matter of time before it will have to be relooked at.

    In saying that, flooding the n11 with 1000s of more cars from j9 will only end one way too.


  • Registered Users Posts: 436 ✭✭incentsitive


    The solution to our traffic problems is not to add more lanes. The solution is high-occupancy, priority being given to buses and cars with more than 1 passenger.
    Having spent a good bit of time in the US, and LA in particular, proves that just adding more lanes adds more cars until you grind to a halt and then you add more lanes and then you grind to a halt again and......


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,901 ✭✭✭✭Kermit.de.frog


    The solution to our traffic problems is not to add more lanes. The solution is high-occupancy, priority being given to buses and cars with more than 1 passenger.
    Having spent a good bit of time in the US, and LA in particular, proves that just adding more lanes adds more cars until you grind to a halt and then you add more lanes and then you grind to a halt again and......

    The flaw with your idea is you want to REMOVE lanes to accommodate. So you want drivers stuck in more traffic and piss them off at the same time.

    I'm in favour of HOV lanes like in the US but they must be in addition to current lanes, not replacements which is mindless.


  • Registered Users Posts: 436 ✭✭incentsitive


    Sorry but not "pissing people off" as Ireland struggles to meet our CO2 emissions targets, is hardly something which must be achieved. We need to get people out of private cars, into sustainable transport modes.
    At the moment the N11 is just chockers. Instead of 50 cars we should have numerous bus services. Stop at Ashford, Beehive, Arklow say. If it had a clear run to the Luas P&R and then onto the N11, it'd save everyone time and stress. The day of using the private car to get to work has to end.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 12,183 Mod ✭✭✭✭Cookiemunster


    Sorry but not "pissing people off" as Ireland struggles to meet our CO2 emissions targets, is hardly something which must be achieved. We need to get people out of private cars, into sustainable transport modes.
    At the moment the N11 is just chockers. Instead of 50 cars we should have numerous bus services. Stop at Ashford, Beehive, Arklow say. If it had a clear run to the Luas P&R and then onto the N11, it'd save everyone time and stress. The day of using the private car to get to work has to end.

    People in Ireland will need to leave their one off houses in the middle of nowhere and move to towns and cities to get them onto PT. That's not going to happen anytime soon. The private car is going nowhere, but over the next decade we'll start transitioning away from the ICE to EVs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,104 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    The solution to our traffic problems is not to add more lanes. The solution is high-occupancy, priority being given to buses and cars with more than 1 passenger.
    Having spent a good bit of time in the US, and LA in particular, proves that just adding more lanes adds more cars until you grind to a halt and then you add more lanes and then you grind to a halt again and......

    I don't think HOV lanes are a good idea, it's still a poor use of road space, and is difficult to enforce.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,483 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    People in Ireland will need to leave their one off houses in the middle of nowhere and move to towns and cities to get them onto PT. That's not going to happen anytime soon. The private car is going nowhere, but over the next decade we'll start transitioning away from the ICE to EVs.
    I don't think that's true. People will drive shorter distances to access public transport. In fact they already are where it is available. Greystones Park and Ride is full early, Ashford House has to have parking restrictions to stop all day parking for the bus service, Lots of cars parked around the Wexford Bus pick up point in Arklow.

    A car journey may remain part of the commute for many people, but it doesn't have to be the whole journey, and particularly not in the city's/ congestion where more emissions are generated per km.

    EV's will do nothing to solve congestion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,642 ✭✭✭Thud


    Buses would need to beat cars for speed over the route for people to switch over. Cars offer greater flexibility (leave whenever from where ever you want and can go via schools/shops/etc on the way home), comfort and reliability than buses.
    The cost is probably a lesser factor in this decision for most.

    Off road solutions like Luas and the Dart can achieve this but I don't see buses being quicker even with a dedicated bus lane as frequent stops, traffic and traffic lights will slow them down. Reliability and frequency would also need to be high for people to switch and that's something buses aren't renowned for in Ireland.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,483 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    Thud wrote: »
    Buses would need to beat cars for speed over the route for people to switch over. Cars offer greater flexibility (leave whenever from where ever you want and can go via schools/shops/etc on the way home), comfort and reliability than buses.
    The cost is probably a lesser factor in this decision for most.

    Off road solutions like Luas and the Dart can achieve this but I don't see buses being quicker even with a dedicated bus lane as frequent stops, traffic and traffic lights will slow them down. Reliability and frequency would also need to be high for people to switch and that's something buses aren't renowned for in Ireland.
    Obviously. But even with that, the 133 is often full both directions. An (enforced) bus lane would make a massive difference between Coynes Cross and Loughlinstown in journey times. Frequency would need investment in buses. Demand is there though - hence the success of Wexford bus, despite the lack of bus lanes, and infrequency.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 19,862 Mod ✭✭✭✭Sam Russell


    Mod: Has any of the last few (many) posts anything to do with the N11?

    Can we have discussion on bus lanes vs car lanes in another thread - preferably in the Motors or the Commuting forums.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,628 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Sorry I have to disagree, it has everything to do with the n11. There is a proposal to upgrade it, part of the upgrade could involve adding a 3rd lane. Can we not discuss whether this 3rd lane should be a bus lane or a general traffic lane.
    To understand the need for a bus lane I don't think its unreasonable to mention the current use of buses and how it affects towns along the route. There is clearly a case for increased bus frequency and adding a bus lane instead of general lane is an option that should be looked at.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,628 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Just a reminder that the consultation meeting with the engineers is on today in the Glenview hotel between 12 and 8pm.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 237 ✭✭tonkpills


    Looks like some content went live today n11m11.ie


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,628 ✭✭✭prunudo


    So, popped into the presentation on the way home from work. Very early days so no real plans as such. Few graphics, aerial views of route etc.
    It seems that it is a very broad scope and there isn't really a plan at all and the idea of the meeting and consultation period to get ideas of the issues, what people would and would not like.
    The engineers/consultants seemed quite coy in what they were saying (or weren't saying). Certainly felt like they were listening to ideas rather than saying what could/would happen.
    I think that it may develop into something much bigger than an n11 upgrade and focus on all transport needs for commuting to Dublin from the southeast.

    They will take on board any submissions and design a plan around that. Then they will have another public consultation at that point.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators Posts: 14,459 Mod ✭✭✭✭marno21


    I was expecting as such, it's very early days yet and they were only appointed a few weeks ago

    Here's the foundation of what'll be happening.. http://www.tii.ie/tii-library/strategic-planning/strategic-reports/M11_N11_Needs_Assessment_Report.pdf


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,104 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    there are existing, reasonably detailed plans for widening J5-J7 including parallel collector roads - is this still happening, or has it been scrapped in favour of this larger plan?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,628 ✭✭✭prunudo


    loyatemu wrote: »
    there are existing, reasonably detailed plans for widening J5-J7 including parallel collector roads - is this still happening, or has it been scrapped in favour of this larger plan?

    The person I was talking to didn't mention it. It seems like it was an overall look at the issues along the route and everything was on the table.
    What they did say though was they'd be looking at 'smart use' and things like average speed limits and ramp metering could be part of any solutions to managing the volumes but as I said in my previous post, I got the impression they were being coy in what they were saying.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,628 ✭✭✭prunudo


    I wonder would an auxiliary lane like they have on the m50 work on this route. There seems to be an awful of people who join at one junction and leave at the next. A huge amount of local traffic movements mixing with the mainline.
    Would it work doubling it up as a buslane or would human behaviour just end up with it becoming a 3rd general traffic lane.

    I see it in the mornings northbound particularly between jn 12 to 11, jn8 to 7 and jn7 to 6 (especially with the Enniskerry turnoff)


  • Registered Users Posts: 436 ✭✭incentsitive


    I wonder is a lot of the problem the hill before Kilmac. A lot of cars can't get up there easily and this definitely backs up the traffic. I think that causes a lot of the tailbacks.
    Although the worst of all must be whatever genuis decided that a petrol station entrance in Kilmac directly off the N11 was a good idea. Or maybe it was a good big envelope....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,628 ✭✭✭prunudo


    I wonder is a lot of the problem the hill before Kilmac. A lot of cars can't get up there easily and this definitely backs up the traffic. I think that causes a lot of the tailbacks.
    Although the worst of all must be whatever genuis decided that a petrol station entrance in Kilmac directly off the N11 was a good idea. Or maybe it was a good big envelope....

    They made a mess of original design, should have bypassed Kilmac and not gone through it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,483 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    I think the traffic flow reports have shown it's Bray South that's the real issue. Petrol station was already there, but they should've CPO'd or designed it properly, but I guess this was before Coynes Cross, Newtown etc. Next online fuel was Barndarrig iirc?

    Northbound is also a clusterf**k for people parking all over the place, ignoring double yellows, queing back on the road (when there is forecourt space) etc at the northbound petrol station. Doesn't effect the main road, but does effect those attempting to join at that junction.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,628 ✭✭✭prunudo


    There's so many issues with the whole route, not just over capacity but also bad design and driver behaviour. The council can't keep giving planning to more housing without improving the infrastructure. With so many new developments being built and more in the pipeline in the towns of North Wicklow I hate to see what it will be like in a years time.


  • Registered Users Posts: 436 ✭✭incentsitive


    jvan wrote: »
    There's so many issues with the whole route, not just over capacity but also bad design and driver behaviour. The council can't keep giving planning to more housing without improving the infrastructure. With so many new developments being built and more in the pipeline in the towns of North Wicklow I hate to see what it will be like in a years time.

    There's a great thing called bus lanes, we need much more of them! Lets be honest, who wouldn't want to get on a bus in Wicklow or wherever and not sit in a car. I know it would need integration and doesn't suit everyone, but at least it would be a starting point.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,104 ✭✭✭✭loyatemu


    jvan wrote: »
    I wonder would an auxiliary lane like they have on the m50 work on this route. There seems to be an awful of people who join at one junction and leave at the next. A huge amount of local traffic movements mixing with the mainline.
    Would it work doubling it up as a buslane or would human behaviour just end up with it becoming a 3rd general traffic lane.

    I see it in the mornings northbound particularly between jn 12 to 11, jn8 to 7 and jn7 to 6 (especially with the Enniskerry turnoff)

    the previous reports recommended aux lanes between junctions 6 and 8 to remove some of the local traffic and close the various LILOs.

    2010 report
    http://www.derekmitchell.ie/wp-content/up/07-139-039-M11-N11-Study-EOC-Mar-2010-Final-NRA-Approved1.pdf...

    2017 report
    http://www.tii.ie/tii-library/strategic-planning/strategic-reports/M11_N11_Needs_Assessment_Report.pdf


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,628 ✭✭✭prunudo


    Here's a copy of the leaflets they were giving out the other night.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,215 ✭✭✭BigMoose


    Regarding the number of people joining one junction and leaving another, I see an awful lot leaving and rejoining at the same junction just to skip about 10 cars... They really need to do something about that, like on ramp flow control to make it not worth while.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,628 ✭✭✭prunudo


    BigMoose wrote: »
    Regarding the number of people joining one junction and leaving another, I see an awful lot leaving and rejoining at the same junction just to skip about 10 cars... They really need to do something about that, like on ramp flow control to make it not worth while.

    Pet hate of mine, that plus the ones using the hard shoulder too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 709 ✭✭✭wowy




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,628 ✭✭✭prunudo


    wowy wrote: »

    Nothing really new in that, just some clumsy words and errors. Hope the segregation is better than just finger barriers! Also eastern carriageway is southbound unless the poles have been on the piss over the Christmas period.


  • Registered Users Posts: 436 ✭✭incentsitive


    If you are that desperate to save 10 cars, you really need to look at your stress levels im traffic! Why would you be bothered


  • Advertisement
Advertisement