Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

3 New Navy Vessels for Irish Naval Service

1373840424386

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 3,990 ✭✭✭sparky42


    scuby wrote: »
    Just looking at a program on discovery, HDMS Absalon looks good. Room for a lynx chopper also that can refuel without landing, doing a hover. A flex deck with a door opening on the Hull.. Might be to big for us?


    Rumour is that pre Crash a "downgraded" Absalon was being looked at for the EPV (so no missiles, just a 76mm mount). The issue now is that the ship hasn't been built for over a decade, don't know how much extra costs it would be to get the yard to build a new one (think that builder has since gone under and been bought out), there's also issues trying to get it within the pricetag that has been reported for the EPV.


    If we'd have got one it would have been a massive upgrade for the NS.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,126 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Me and Sparky are on the same page about this.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,751 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs




  • Registered Users Posts: 3,990 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Tabnabs wrote: »


    Have they managed to fix the defects with the new Batch of Rivers?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 421 ✭✭Folkstonian


    sparky42 wrote: »
    Have they managed to fix the defects with the new Batch of Rivers?

    I don’t believe so. HMS Forth is still in Portsmouth, where she’s been for ages, and the rest are with BAE.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,577 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    sparky42 wrote: »
    Have they managed to fix the defects with the new Batch of Rivers?

    What's up with them?

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,990 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Markcheese wrote: »
    What's up with them?
    Well the first one was refused by the RN when it was found that bolt heads had been sheared during construction and glued back on to hid it, think she's still back with BAE being put right.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    sparky42 wrote: »
    Well the first one was refused by the RN when it was found that bolt heads had been sheared during construction and glued back on to hid it, think she's still back with BAE being put right.

    Oh lordy if that is the quality of the workmanship God only knows what else is in there.

    I'm not surprised they refused it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 514 ✭✭✭Savage93


    Me and Sparky are on the same page about this.

    Spark, you must be thrilled about this.:D:D:D:D:D:D:D


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,126 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Now that the Brits have gone completely stupid about Brexit...we need to be looking at the position regarding Rockall. Time to order some hefty frigates and a few submarines imo. And lets get the Rangers out on to the rock!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 1,126 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Now that the Brits have gone completely stupid about Brexit...we need to be looking at the position regarding Rockall. Time to order some hefty frigates and a few submarines imo. And lets get the Rangers out on to the rock!


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Now that the Brits have gone completely stupid about Brexit...we need to be looking at the position regarding Rockall. Time to order some hefty frigates and a few submarines imo. And lets get the Rangers out on to the rock!

    Its the middle of February, you can go out there first.........:pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,364 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Its the middle of February, you can go out there first.........:pac:

    Anytime of the year he can go first.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,126 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Don't know if any of you lads have been keeping an eye on the arms fair thats going on in the UAE at the moment...but the Kalashnikov company have launched a brand new UAV. Highly capable and accurate and low cost into the bargain. We could do with a few of them on the P60's! Check it out on google. Specs and a video are available.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,990 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Is it needed to say "NATO Standard" in a different language?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,990 ✭✭✭sparky42


    To go back to the question of the Peacock's and their replacement and the potential impact of Brexit, anyone see tonights howls of outrage from the DUP about two NI ships being detained, seems Dundalk Bay is now UK waters as well...


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,126 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Excellent work by the navy! I see the Spanish navy have been giving the brits some grief down in Gibraltar as well this week. Maybe we should invite them over to do some joint exercises in the vicinity of Rockall!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,577 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Excellent work by the navy! I see the Spanish navy have been giving the brits some grief down in Gibraltar as well this week. Maybe we should invite them over to do some joint exercises in the vicinity of Rockall!

    Don't we already have an agreement about rockall.?

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users Posts: 590 ✭✭✭Leonidas BL


    Its just a rock ffs...


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,126 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    "NATO STANDARD" Ah well...we'll have to get rid of the oileann pipes then! And the boiled gammon and colcannon!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,990 ✭✭✭sparky42


    "NATO STANDARD" Ah well...we'll have to get rid of the oileann pipes then! And the boiled gammon and colcannon!


    How bad is your cooking that you use them as weapons?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,126 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Nothing beats a bit of ROCKET in a salad!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,749 ✭✭✭Smiles35


    Don't know if any of you lads have been keeping an eye on the arms fair thats going on in the UAE at the moment...but the Kalashnikov company have launched a brand new UAV. Highly capable and accurate and low cost into the bargain. We could do with a few of them on the P60's! Check it out on google. Specs and a video are available.


    Should actually. If we have to do border checks let the Navy handle it with those.


  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,751 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs


    The Royal Norwegian Navy’s new logistics and support vessel HNoMS Maud has arrived from the builders yard. Based on BMT’s scalable AEGIR platform design https://www.bmtdsl.co.uk/bmt-design-portfolio/auxiliaries/bmt-aegir-logistic-support-vessels/. The 26,000-tonne logistics and support vessel is fully winterised, has a helicopter flight deck and hangar, and a 48-bed hospital capability.

    Maud will be used by the navy to provide fuel and fresh water for other units at sea. It will additionally support allies and take part in international and humanitarian missions

    ba3f4cb8-1baa-455d-8aa3-082ff0a62e36?fit=crop&h=810&q=80&w=1440

    Let's hope they keep it off the rocks :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,126 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    Cool looking piece of kit, though I think I'd prefer a Memo 200 class frigate meself


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,126 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    I see Merkel is coming over to Dublin to put some pressure on Leo about policing the NI border. Opportunity there to get some EU funds to beef up the armed forces. Maybe a frigate or two and a squadron of fast jets.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,936 ✭✭✭✭banie01


    Maybe a frigate or two and a squadron of fast jets.

    A frigate and fast jets for policing our land border?
    Really...
    Well in that case sure we may as well hit Merkel up for their mothballed Leopards and Marders too!
    We can just up the numbers in the DF by 10k and sort out a pile of new forward bases along the border too while we are at it :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,985 ✭✭✭mikeym


    How come GB Shaw hasn't been commissioned yet?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,990 ✭✭✭sparky42


    mikeym wrote: »
    How come GB Shaw hasn't been commissioned yet?


    Last I saw they were still working everything up after fitting the 76mm.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Recreation & Hobbies Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 15,751 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tabnabs




  • Registered Users Posts: 336 ✭✭Captcha


    We need Aircraft Carriers asap


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,985 ✭✭✭mikeym


    Captcha wrote: »
    We need Aircraft Carriers asap

    No we dont.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,990 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Joyce and Beckett were the two doing the training today along with an AW 139.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,851 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    Tabnabs wrote: »

    Are the rounds in a magazine similar to a rifle so they could go full automatic if they wanted or is it limited


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,467 ✭✭✭Heraldoffreeent


    Captcha wrote: »
    We need Aircraft Carriers asap
    mikeym wrote: »
    No we dont.


    Ah come on, just getting one is pretty pointless..............


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,364 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    roadmaster wrote: »
    Are the rounds in a magazine similar to a rifle so they could go full automatic if they wanted or is it limited

    Max rate of fire is 120 rds/min under electronic fire control which is obviously 2 per second but realistically you wouldn't see bursts of more than 3 or 4 rounds.

    There are some vids on youtube of the 76 turret on a test rig on land firing 40 rounds in 20 secs but you'd be asking a lot of the cooling system as well as magazine feed and storage to be doing that at sea.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,126 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    I see there's an auld ship in Dublin port that was impounded some years ago by the revenue and they want shut of it. That could come in a bit handy for the NS to do some real heavy duty stuff with the 76 mm. Bang Bang Bang and down she goes!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,869 ✭✭✭Alkers


    I see there's an auld ship in Dublin port that was impounded some years ago by the revenue and they want shut of it. That could come in a bit handy for the NS to do some real heavy duty stuff with the 76 mm. Bang Bang Bang and down she goes!


    I recall reading that the costs involved are massive even to make her suitable for sinking without causing an environmental incident.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,303 ✭✭✭Widdensushi


    Now that the Brits have gone completely stupid about Brexit...we need to be looking at the position regarding Rockall. Time to order some hefty frigates and a few submarines imo. And lets get the Rangers out on to the rock!

    sure if we got it we would only give it away like the rest of the fishing and mineral resources


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,851 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    http://coastmonkey.ie/le-george-bernard-shaw-ceremony-waterford/

    I wonder where did Leo and that clown keogh get the crew from


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,990 ✭✭✭sparky42


    roadmaster wrote: »
    http://coastmonkey.ie/le-george-bernard-shaw-ceremony-waterford/

    I wonder where did Leo and that clown keogh get the crew from


    Why do you think the other three 60's are tied up, two in the dockyard, one at the base. Look the manpower situation is a disaster, but Shaw was always going to cause manpower issues anyway as she was never planned for.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,851 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    sparky42 wrote: »
    Why do you think the other three 60's are tied up, two in the dockyard, one at the base. Look the manpower situation is a disaster, but Shaw was always going to cause manpower issues anyway as she was never planned for.

    It’s wonder the government hasn’t asked the navy to hide the ships docked in the naval base so no one can ask questions why they are tied up


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,990 ✭✭✭sparky42


    roadmaster wrote: »
    It’s wonder the government hasn’t asked the navy to hide the ships docked in the naval base so no one can ask questions why they are tied up
    That would require people to be interested enough in the DF to care, sadly we know that's not the case.


  • Registered Users Posts: 514 ✭✭✭Savage93


    sparky42 wrote: »
    That would require people to be interested enough in the DF to care, sadly we know that's not the case.

    Sadly too true Spark.
    I wonder if Brussels will put the boot in as they have largely funded the new vessels and they are supposed to perform roles in EU waters. The present rot in the DF from lack of numbers has to be seriously impacting effectiveness, morale and , of course, ability to undertake any new UN roles .

    Weirdly, in the face of the above, 74 officers commissioned last year (15 Maltese I think) and campaign underway to take on 100 cadets in next class. The question is will there be anyone/anything for them to lead in the future??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,467 ✭✭✭Heraldoffreeent


    Savage93 wrote: »
    Sadly too true Spark.
    I wonder if Brussels will put the boot in as they have largely funded the new vessels and they are supposed to perform roles in EU waters. The present rot in the DF from lack of numbers has to be seriously impacting effectiveness, morale and , of course, ability to undertake any new UN roles .

    Weirdly, in the face of the above, 74 officers commissioned last year (15 Maltese I think) and campaign underway to take on 100 cadets in next class. The question is will there be anyone/anything for them to lead in the future??

    How have the EU largely funded the new ships?


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,851 ✭✭✭roadmaster


    How have the EU largely funded the new ships?


    I dont think there was much if any EU funds for the becketts


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,126 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    You could always ask your TD to raise a question in the dail. I thought that the EU paid for the hulls and the DF paid for the weaponry.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,467 ✭✭✭Heraldoffreeent


    You could always ask your TD to raise a question in the dail. I thought that the EU paid for the hulls and the DF paid for the weaponry.

    Or you could Google it.

    You know what thought did?

    Have you two accounts on this thread now?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,126 ✭✭✭jonnybigwallet


    No Herald. Only one.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,990 ✭✭✭sparky42


    Savage93 wrote: »
    Sadly too true Spark.
    I wonder if Brussels will put the boot in as they have largely funded the new vessels and they are supposed to perform roles in EU waters. The present rot in the DF from lack of numbers has to be seriously impacting effectiveness, morale and , of course, ability to undertake any new UN roles .

    Don't think the EU provided any funds towards the P60 class, nor was there any EU roles mandated (beyond normal fisheries anyway)


  • Advertisement
Advertisement