Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

'Multiple shooting' at congressional baseball game practice field

2

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,631 ✭✭✭✭Hank Scorpio


    Water John wrote: »
    Hank, you do dredge up some whacky stuff. WTF has it got to do with today's events.

    Who brought up Alex Jones and Mike Cernovich in an attempt at deflection?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,924 ✭✭✭wonderfullife


    biko wrote: »

    I'm not much of a conspiracy theorist but this whole episode reminds me of the scene in Minority Report where Tom Cruise is faced with the orgy of evidence on the bed.

    60 rounds fired - no fatality among GOP.
    Shooter - quickly tied to Bernie/Dems.
    Shooter - reported alive and in custody, now = dead
    Video of incident - non existent.

    Convenient stuff.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 22,354 ✭✭✭✭endacl


    Celticfire wrote: »
    Supposedly up to 50 shots fired.
    At least 5 shot.
    Suspect should also be charged with incompetence.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Alex Jones is a nut case. The fact that he has an audience is what's worrying.
    If somebody was like him on the other side of the political spectrum, it would worry me too.

    Wonderfullife, have we a conspiracy theory already?
    Well if the right has them, I suppose the left can have them too.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,924 ✭✭✭wonderfullife


    Water John wrote: »
    Alex Jones is a nut case. The fact that he has an audience is what's worrying.
    If somebody was like him on the other side of the political spectrum, it would worry me too.

    I literally just posted a conspiracy theory lol :)

    Anyway I'm out, I can't deal with anymore left v right stuff and I'm clearly watching too much of the X Files.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,626 ✭✭✭Glenster


    Water John wrote: »
    Alex Jones is a nut case. The fact that he has an audience is what's worrying.
    If somebody was like him on the other side of the political spectrum, it would worry me too.

    I still haven't forgiven alex jones for convincing that soldier to bomb the aliens in Arrival.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,526 ✭✭✭Stigura


    BREAK!!!

    Okay. guys. I'm not f**king interested in getting involved here. None of it interests, or bothers me. I'm the guy in the white shirt and black bow tie. (Do Boxing Referees still wear bow ties?)

    Link me to one Democrat Politician calling out the antifa.
    who are your heroes? Cernovich? Gavin McInnes? Do you have a little Pepe the Frog avatar on your twitter?

    Pretty pathetic.


    " wonderfullife "; " Hank " asked you a pretty straight question, there. Your reply was not an answer.

    Let's be fair .....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,690 ✭✭✭✭Skylinehead


    These are some of the people leading "The resistance" who have organised and spoke publicly at marches against Trump. If it wasn't for double standards the left would have no standards at all.

    Donna Hylton

    In 1985, Hylton and two accomplices drugged and kidnapped 62-year-old Long Island real-estate broker Thomas Vigliarolo, and held him prisoner for 15-20 days. While imprisoned, Vigliarolo was starved, burned, beaten, sexually assaulted, raped and tortured by three men and four women, including Hylton. It was Hylton who delivered a ransom note and tape to a friend of Vigliarolo, leading to her capture.

    Linda Sarsour

    https://twitter.com/lsarsour/status/116922589967949824?lang=en
    Jesus Hank stop with the random off topic ****e please.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,631 ✭✭✭✭Hank Scorpio


    Jesus Hank stop with the random off topic ****e please.

    Standard retort to someone bringing up Alex Jones et al in this thread. The dude shall abide though.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,554 ✭✭✭Really Interested


    Weird that the Portland guy and this recent attack had something in common both campaigned in last years election season both for same candidate, Bernie Saunders! WTF!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,759 ✭✭✭jobbridge4life


    Link me to one Democrat Politician calling out the antifa.

    https://www.facebook.com/GavinNewsom/photos/a.75229533116.73338.10128918116/10155100630108117/?type=3&theater

    California Democratic Lt Governor Gavin Newsom condeming Berkeley riot.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,690 ✭✭✭✭Skylinehead


    Standard retort to someone bringing up Alex Jones et al in this thread. The dude shall abide though.

    Yeah I should make this far more general. Everyone stop with the antifa and Alex Jones and whatever ****e :P


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,631 ✭✭✭✭Hank Scorpio



    Lol. Where does he mention the Antifa, his statement reads like the violence was a reaction to "white supremacist attacks", when in fact what actually happened was a bunch of people dressed in black hiding their faces showed up and started attacking Trump supporters including Women with sticks, lighting fires and smashing up buildings including parts of the college and surrounding buildings along the campus .

    Did you even read what he wrote? Such tolerance, much wow.

    Edit: Just seen above Mod post, I'm done with this topic.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭greencap


    Pinch Flat wrote: »
    Just another day in 'Murica. When guns are easy to get as a toaster, and large amounts of lunatics carry them, this will be an almost daily occurrence.

    Its never ending.

    The gun problem in the US is so severe that its like withdrawal at this stage, if the cause was taken away tomorrow the patient would die.

    So ironically the pro-gun nuts are actually right in some regards.

    That they think they're actually somehow winning, by putting themselves in un-necessary danger, is another topic.

    I do sometimes wonder how many victims in these various shootings were pro-gun, and wonder what thought went through their head as a local whacked out teen slid through the stadium doors with his 'hunting' assault rifle.

    experience talking with gun nuts leads me to believe it may well have been something along the lines of 'my spraying with a 45 round magazine doesn't mean that the weapon wasn't designed for hunting grouse'.

    that or 'oh fck maybe i was wrong'.

    probably the earlier.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,747 ✭✭✭✭wes


    https://www.massshootingtracker.org/data

    195 mass shootings in the USA so far this year. The amount of gun violence in the US is pretty awful, and this latest incident is just the latest. Hopefully, all the victims pull through.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,102 ✭✭✭greencap


    wes wrote: »
    https://www.massshootingtracker.org/data

    195 mass shootings in the USA so far this year. The amount of gun violence in the US is pretty awful, and this latest incident is just the latest. Hopefully, all the victims pull through.

    Yeah but thats just the price of freedom.

    You see if there weren't citizens armed with near military grade firearms it would mean that the government could turn on them, for the craic like.

    But because the citizenry has these light armaments it means that they can stop the US govt military forces.

    Air support, drone technology, pinpoint artillery and armored vehicles that even rockets just bounce off....doesn't matter.

    It worked in the 1700's so that means that it must definitely work again.

    Thats how life works - everything that worked yesterday necessarily works today.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,038 ✭✭✭circadian


    Weird that the Portland guy and this recent attack had something in common both campaigned in last years election season both for same candidate, Bernie Saunders! WTF!

    Any relation to Dean?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,554 ✭✭✭Really Interested


    circadian wrote: »
    Any relation to Dean?

    Who is dean?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,808 ✭✭✭✭Water John


    Its Sanders, get it.
    For Saunders, you can have Dean, Jennifer et al.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,069 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    I'm already ****ing sick of people trying to talk about this issue. Trying to say "ohp, it's always the
    doing this". And taking it to absurd extremes like "herp no the Charleston shooter was a liberal." And I think, on that one claim alone, I myself felt enraged toward that man's sheer ignorance of matters he knew **** all about. Blatant lying at the expense of dead people to prove a cheap political point for 5 minutes.

    A reality TV star became the president by campaigning on a platform that smeared journalism as a sham and political correctness as a joke, then when the same Shakespeare play as had happened when it portrayed Obama 5 years ago, portrays current President Trump being stabbed, people abruptly lose their ****.

    You can all but predict when these attacks will happen though, that is granted. Gabby Giffords was shot during a highly divisive midterm election season and actors like Sarah Palin had ratcheted up rhetoric against political 'targets' that needed to be unseated from office. The Center for Media Progress doctored up some videos of planned parenthood wheeling and dealing in aborted fetus body parts, and promptly a shooter answered the call! And now, Republicans are all but protecting their man with the R- in front of his name, while they are trying to pass an unmitigated disaster of a healthcare plan to 'replace' Obamacare with, and if you go online you will find all sorts of nuttiness both ways, with trolls and psychos alike calling other fellow Americans 'subhuman' and all the rest, for having different political views, and that's just the tip of it. Frankly, i'm not shocked that Scalise was targeted, after all but dancing around about how great it was that people were going to be flung off their healthcare plans. http://scalise.house.gov/press-release/scalise-passage-ahca-today-we-made-history

    This isn't a good day for anybody. This is a **** ****ing day.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 26,458 ✭✭✭✭gandalf


    TBH this is just another example of why guns should be removed from the reach of ordinary citizens in US society. FFS this lad had form from reading his bio. There is no way he should have had access to weapons given his past. Now watch as all the players involved will invoke all sorts of debate whilst they continue to dance around the real reason which is the continued access to military grade weapons by ordinary US citizens.


  • Registered Users Posts: 33,752 ✭✭✭✭RobertKK


    A radicalised Bernie Sanders supporter who hates Trump, the new threat...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,069 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    A cellphone video is available online, nothing graphic. But you can get a sense for the scene, the length of the incident and the crossfire

    http://nypost.com/2017/06/14/the-moment-the-gop-shooter-opened-fire/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,522 ✭✭✭✭Cookie_Monster


    Giving everyone a gun really is a wonderful terrible idea.

    yeah, in america it is. Most countries full of actual adults seem to manage pretty well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,069 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    RobertKK wrote: »
    A radicalised Bernie Sanders supporter who hates Trump, the new threat...

    Oh no, keep going. You want to make fun of the surface, for your own political advantage, but keep going. Yes, he supported Bernie, he was also a small business owner and he also had a lengthy criminal record for violence. Apparently, last year his business fell apart and he had up to today been living out of a local YMCA and a duffelbag. He was homeless. Already predisposed to violence, it didn't help that he was left out in the rain while Republicans he dehumanized, pontificated on the need to slash healthcare and social supports while producing tax cuts for wealthy campaign contributors.

    What we can take away from most mass shooters in the US is that most of them are white and male, and many if not all of them come from difficult backgrounds, including poverty and radicalization whether it comes from a church, a viral youtube video, or what have you. They come from all manner of political backgrounds, including the lack of (nihilism). All that normally comes out of these 'gun' debates, is the conclusion that as a society, we can inflict the best mitigation of these attacks by at the very least taking measures to promote stability for the most vulnerable people of the population (the sick, the elderly, the homeless) and to make investments in mental health. FDR if I recall, in the New Deal, (or it was JFK?) enacted some legislation to establish nationwide mental health facilities that unfortunately, were defunded a short time later by the Congress and little came of it. To this day we still threaten to cut off PBS, too, but I will leave this somewhat old congressional testimony from Mr. Rogers on the subject of the importance of mental health, and the benefit of his programming. Some senators at the time commented directly that his comments by and large earned PBS its continued funding, and it's I think very helpful to look back to when politicians spoke slower and more thoughtfully and weren't afraid of accepting that someone else's idea was good.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,069 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    As I continue seeing more and more asinine, dehumanizing comments online about this somehow only being a leftwing issue that is somehow destroying America, I feel people must be reminded that there is plenty of violence to go around and that this is again, not an issue of political beliefs.
    Pre-2001[edit]
    According to George Michael, "right-wing terrorism and violence has a long history in America".[28] Right-wing violent incidents began to outnumber Marxist incidents in the United States during the 1980s and 1990s.[29]:29 Michael observes the waning of left-wing terrorism accompanying the rise of right-wing terrorism, with a noticeable "convergence" of the goals of militant Islam with those of the extreme right. Islamic studies scholar Youssef M. Choueiri classified Islamic fundamentalist movements involving revivalism, reformism, and radicalism as within the scope of "right-wing politics".[30]:9

    During the 1980s, more than 75 right-wing extremists were prosecuted in the United States for acts of terrorism, carrying out six attacks.[31] In 1983, Gordon Kahl, a Posse Comitatus activist, killed two federal marshals and was later killed by police. Also that year, the white nationalist revolutionary group The Order (also known as the Brüder Schweigen or Silent Brotherhood) robbed banks and armored cars, as well as a sex shop,[32] bombed a theater and a synagogue and murdered radio talk show host Alan Berg.[33][34]

    The April 19, 1995 attack on the Murrah federal building in Oklahoma by Timothy McVeigh and Terry Nichols killed 168 people and was the deadliest act of domestic terrorism in the history of the United States.[35] McVeigh stated that it was retaliation for the government's actions at Ruby Ridge and Waco.[36] McVeigh attended Michigan Militia gun shows.[37][38]

    Eric Rudolph executed a series of terrorist attacks between 1996 and 1998. He carried out the 1996 Centennial Olympic Park bombing—which claimed two lives and injured 111—aiming to cancel the games, claiming they promoted global socialism and to embarrass the U.S. government.[39] Rudolph confessed to bombing an abortion clinic in Sandy Springs, an Atlanta suburb, on January 16, 1997, the Otherside Lounge, an Atlanta lesbian bar, on February 21, 1997, injuring five and an abortion clinic in Birmingham, Alabama on January 29, 1998, killing Birmingham police officer and part-time clinic security guard Robert Sanderson and critically injuring nurse Emily Lyons.

    Post-2001[edit]
    As of June 2015, right-wing attacks since the September 11 attacks (9/11) had claimed more lives (48) than attacks committed by jihadists (26).[40] Thereafter, jihadist terrorist attacks (the 2015 San Bernardino attack and the 2016 Orlando nightclub shooting) raised the Islamic extremist death toll above that caused by right-wing extremists. As of July 2016, the New America Foundation placed the number killed in terrorist attacks in the U.S. (since 9/11) as follows: 94 killed in jihadist terrorist attacks, 50 killed in far-right attacks, and 5 killed in far-left attacks.[41]

    New America's tally shows 21 instances of right-wing terrorist attacks causing 53 fatalities since September 11, 2001. These were:[41]

    The 2017 stabbing of Timothy Caughman in New York City (1 killed),
    The 2015 Colorado Springs Planned Parenthood shooting (3 killed),
    The 2015 Charleston church shooting (9 killed),
    The 2014 ambush attack on Las Vegas police officers (5 killed),
    The 2014 Pennsylvania State Police barracks attack in Blooming Grove, Pennsylvania (1 killed),
    A 2012 tri-state killing spree by white supremacists, David Pedersen and Holly Grigsby (4 killed),
    A 2012 ambush of St. John the Baptist Parish, Louisiana police (2 killed),
    The 2012 Wisconsin Sikh temple shooting (6 killed),
    The 2011 FEAR group attacks (3 killed),
    A murder in 2010 in Carlisle, Pennsylvania (1 killed),
    A 2010 suicide attack by airplane in Austin, Texas (1 killed),
    The 2009 shooting of Pittsburgh police officers (3 killed),
    The 2009 United States Holocaust Memorial Museum shooting (1 killed),
    The 2009 assassination of George Tiller (1 killed),
    The 2009 murders of Raul and Brisenia Flores in Pima County, Arizona (2 killed),
    The 2009 murders in Brockton, Massachusetts (2 killed),
    The 2008 Knoxville Unitarian Universalist church shooting (2 killed),
    And the 2004 bank robbery in Tulsa, Oklahoma (1 killed).
    According to the Government Accountability Office of the United States, 73% of violent extremist incidents that resulted in deaths since September 12, 2001 were caused by right wing extremists groups.[42][43]


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,793 ✭✭✭Hande hoche!


    On the plus side the charity baseball game should raise more money based on all the publicity.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,069 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    silverharp wrote: »
    Probably a registered democrat , 50 shots fired and no one killed, cant have had much in the way of weapons training.

    Incidentally, this was the morbid laugh I needed today.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,793 ✭✭✭Hande hoche!


    silverharp wrote: »
    Probably a registered democrat , 50 shots fired and no one killed, cant have had much in the way of weapons training.
    He was probably using a Klobb.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,570 ✭✭✭RandomName2


    Overheal wrote: »
    As I continue seeing more and more asinine, dehumanizing comments online about this somehow only being a leftwing issue that is somehow destroying America, I feel people must be reminded that there is plenty of violence to go around and that this is again, not an issue of political beliefs.

    Just going to say that 53 deaths in a 16 year period is an irrelevant number. Sure 13 people were killed in the fort hood shooting in 2009 alone.

    Though your other points, I must admit, make sense.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 25,611 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I can't understand people being appalled by things like this or Gabby Gifford getting shot when they also say that part of the need for everyone to have weapons is to stand up to the government.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,570 ✭✭✭RandomName2


    I can't understand people being appalled by things like this or Gabby Gifford getting shot when they also say that part of the need for everyone to have weapons is to stand up to the government.

    I think the meaning is the institution of the government: which is daft. A gun will never give you as an individual any protection against the government.

    As a mob potentially guns can give you power, but incidents like Wako would indicate otherwise.

    The LA riots arguably gave a section of the public some power over regional government, but guns weren't a major factor in that, as far as I'm aware


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,793 ✭✭✭Hande hoche!


    I think the meaning is the institution of the government: which is daft. A gun will never give you as an individual any protection against the government.

    As a mob potentially guns can give you power, but incidents like Wako would indicate otherwise.

    The LA riots arguably gave a section of the public some power over regional government, but guns weren't a major factor in that, as far as I'm aware

    The idealized version is probably something close to the Battle of Athens.


  • Registered Users Posts: 33,752 ✭✭✭✭RobertKK


    Overheal wrote: »
    Oh no, keep going. You want to make fun of the surface, for your own political advantage, but keep going. Yes, he supported Bernie, he was also a small business owner and he also had a lengthy criminal record for violence. Apparently, last year his business fell apart and he had up to today been living out of a local YMCA and a duffelbag. He was homeless. Already predisposed to violence, it didn't help that he was left out in the rain while Republicans he dehumanized, pontificated on the need to slash healthcare and social supports while producing tax cuts for wealthy campaign contributors.

    What we can take away from most mass shooters in the US is that most of them are white and male, and many if not all of them come from difficult backgrounds, including poverty and radicalization whether it comes from a church, a viral youtube video, or what have you. They come from all manner of political backgrounds, including the lack of (nihilism). All that normally comes out of these 'gun' debates, is the conclusion that as a society, we can inflict the best mitigation of these attacks by at the very least taking measures to promote stability for the most vulnerable people of the population (the sick, the elderly, the homeless) and to make investments in mental health. FDR if I recall, in the New Deal, (or it was JFK?) enacted some legislation to establish nationwide mental health facilities that unfortunately, were defunded a short time later by the Congress and little came of it. To this day we still threaten to cut off PBS, too, but I will leave this somewhat old congressional testimony from Mr. Rogers on the subject of the importance of mental health, and the benefit of his programming. Some senators at the time commented directly that his comments by and large earned PBS its continued funding, and it's I think very helpful to look back to when politicians spoke slower and more thoughtfully and weren't afraid of accepting that someone else's idea was good.


    The fact is his hate of Trump and the Republicans is what led to this attack. He is a supporter of the Democrats who became radicalised by his irrational hate.
    All these people who do these things are radicalised by some form of hate that makes them do these crazy attacks.
    It is the same for the person who shot the Democrat congresswoman Giffords.
    It is a radical action to go and shoot people whoever they are.
    I simply pointed out the background to this particular attacker. He was radicalised by an irrational hatred towards the Republicans.


  • Registered Users Posts: 137 ✭✭Madagascan


    So the Left oppose Trump send encourage this to happen.
    It's not a surprise.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,084 ✭✭✭✭Kirby


    Madagascan wrote: »
    So the Left oppose Trump send encourage this to happen.
    It's not a surprise.

    :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,793 ✭✭✭Hande hoche!


    Just going to say that 53 deaths in a 16 year period is an irrelevant number. Sure 13 people were killed in the fort hood shooting in 2009 alone.

    Though your other points, I must admit, make sense.

    Yeah, 53 deaths due to right wing extremism is scary. But as is the 49 victims of the pulse shooting.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,554 ✭✭✭Really Interested


    I think the meaning is the institution of the government: which is daft. A gun will never give you as an individual any protection against the government.

    As a mob potentially guns can give you power, but incidents like Wako would indicate otherwise.

    The LA riots arguably gave a section of the public some power over regional government, but guns weren't a major factor in that, as far as I'm aware

    In relation to your mob comment it is important to look at the 2nd amendment, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

    I find the contradictions in US constitutional jurisprudence to be very interesting.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,516 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    In relation to your mob comment it is important to look at the 2nd amendment, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."

    I find the contradictions in US constitutional jurisprudence to be very interesting.


    all depends on how you read it. the intent of the writer is also important.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,554 ✭✭✭Really Interested


    all depends on how you read it. the intent of the writer is also important.

    Exactly and the SC has decided to say it is an individual right not a community right.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,516 ✭✭✭✭ohnonotgmail


    Exactly and the SC has decided to say it is an individual right not a community right.


    tradtionally the militia provided their own arms. If you deny the people the right to arms then a militia is not possible. well that is the logic anyway.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,436 ✭✭✭c_man


    The "punch a Nazi" crowd must be loving this.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,759 ✭✭✭jobbridge4life


    c_man wrote: »
    The "punch a Nazi" crowd must be loving this.

    Because there is no distinction between punching a man who advocates racial cleansing and attempting to murder elected representatives.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,436 ✭✭✭c_man


    Because there is no distinction between punching a man who advocates racial cleansing and attempting to murder elected representatives.

    They're advocating violence against those they describe as nazis. The description of such rests entirely with the aggressor.

    Plenty of the videos I've seen on the topic, the victims are just Trump supporters/republicans. And of course we could spend the day linking stories off one punch kills. So yeah, I imagine there's a lot of satisfied "resisters" out there, and judging from other online sources the only regret seems to be that yer man was a pi$$ poor shot.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,676 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    here is a Huff Post writer's view, he seems all cut up :rolleyes:

    DCW6WYDUQAA4nAT.jpg

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,069 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    Just going to say that 53 deaths in a 16 year period is an irrelevant number. Sure 13 people were killed in the fort hood shooting in 2009 alone.

    Though your other points, I must admit, make sense.

    Well, there was the Oklahoma City Bombing which killed 169, in '95.

    I don't have the numbers for 'liberal' mass shootings/terrorist events but I imagine the numbers aren't much different from the trend.
    RobertKK wrote: »
    The fact is his hate of Trump and the Republicans is what led to this attack. He is a supporter of the Democrats who became radicalised by his irrational hate.
    All these people who do these things are radicalised by some form of hate that makes them do these crazy attacks.
    It is the same for the person who shot the Democrat congresswoman Giffords.
    It is a radical action to go and shoot people whoever they are.
    I simply pointed out the background to this particular attacker. He was radicalised by an irrational hatred towards the Republicans.

    People are radicalized all the time, from all walks of life. Progressives, conservatives, christians, muslims, you name it there's a psycho and a case file to review.
    silverharp wrote: »
    here is a Huff Post writer's view, he seems all cut up
    But he is not wrong, and from the context evidently is engaged in the discussion on how this event relates back to the purpose of the 2nd Amendment, something an old tweet from Rand Paul took center stage of:

    https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/746022114042478592?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mediaite.com%2Fonline%2Fa-year-ago-rand-paul-tweeted-that-2nd-amendment-exists-to-shoot-at-the-government%2F

    According to Paul's spin doctors/team this wasn't a direct quote, but a 'livetweet' of a speech, but all the same the comment got national attention.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,676 ✭✭✭✭silverharp


    Overheal wrote: »


    But he is not wrong, and from the context evidently is engaged in the discussion on how this event relates back to the purpose of the 2nd Amendment, something an old tweet from Rand Paul took center stage of:

    https://twitter.com/RandPaul/status/746022114042478592?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw&ref_url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.mediaite.com%2Fonline%2Fa-year-ago-rand-paul-tweeted-that-2nd-amendment-exists-to-shoot-at-the-government%2F

    According to Paul's spin doctors/team this wasn't a direct quote, but a 'livetweet' of a speech, but all the same the comment got national attention.

    I know "tyrannical" is subjective but unless you just want permission to be a terrorist we are talking something big like getting rid of elections, no freedom to travel something fundamental that a Republic would not contemplate.

    A belief in gender identity involves a level of faith as there is nothing tangible to prove its existence which, as something divorced from the physical body, is similar to the idea of a soul. - Colette Colfer



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 85,069 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    silverharp wrote: »
    I know "tyrannical" is subjective but unless you just want permission to be a terrorist we are talking something big like getting rid of elections, no freedom to travel something fundamental that a Republic would not contemplate.

    Well, in my humble perspective, the guy was set off by the AHCA, which is just, truly, an awful piece of legislation, with an equally awful political background. I don't know if people actually want to get into it all but the short version is that it repeals most of the ACA, restores the ability of insurance companies to drop you for pre-existing conditions and such - the CBO projections about the bill in its current state were pretty damning, and Scalise triumphed it's passing. And certainly through that lens, killing off Americans to save a few billion dollars, would be tantamount to tyranny.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,900 ✭✭✭InTheTrees


    Overheal wrote: »
    Well, in my humble perspective, the guy was set off by the AHCA, which is just, truly, an awful piece of legislation, with an equally awful political background. I don't know if people actually want to get into it all but the short version is that it repeals most of the ACA, restores the ability of insurance companies to drop you for pre-existing conditions and such - the CBO projections about the bill in its current state were pretty damning, and Scalise triumphed it's passing. And certainly through that lens, killing off Americans to save a few billion dollars, would be tantamount to tyranny.

    Agreed. Before ObamaCare they say 35,000 people were dying every year because of no healthcare.

    Trump and the republicans want to return to that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,793 ✭✭✭Hande hoche!


    Seems like the shooter in question had a history of domestic violence and a list with other Republicans on it.

    http://uk.businessinsider.com/baseball-shooting-victims-list-james-hodgkinson-steve-scalise-2017-6


  • Advertisement
Advertisement