Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

All Things Met Eireann Related Go in Here (MOD NOTE #1)

1246723

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,565 ✭✭✭Pangea


    Leave it to a woman


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,359 ✭✭✭whiteandlight


    I would generally be very much on met eireannn side but there has been sticking snow at low levels never mind higher ground all day from places across the country-Longford, carrick on Shannon and all the northern counties as the day wore on. The forecast in question by Gerry did not even mention this and we were only 24 hours odd out from the event.

    I understand that met eireann need to be a lot more secure in their forecasts than everyone on here who does not have a country paying attention but people on higher ground could, and really should have been warned on Wednesday night and not had to wait until Thursday when the snow was hitting that night.


  • Registered Users Posts: 245 ✭✭Blizzard 2010


    Give me Jean anyday xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,550 ✭✭✭Min


    Rain, sleet and snow showers for Leinster and Ulster utpto and including Sunday.
    On Sunday rain and sleet into the southwest and overnight it will spread elsewhere and falling as snow in most areas.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,263 ✭✭✭mattser


    I would generally be very much on met eireannn side but there has been sticking snow at low levels never mind higher ground all day from places across the country-Longford, carrick on Shannon and all the northern counties as the day wore on. The forecast in question by Gerry did not even mention this and we were only 24 hours odd out from the event.

    I understand that met eireann need to be a lot more secure in their forecasts than everyone on here who does not have a country paying attention but people on higher ground could, and really should have been warned on Wednesday night and not had to wait until Thursday when the snow was hitting that night.

    And that, as the man says, is that. UNRELIABLE.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,565 ✭✭✭Pangea


    I propose a motion to merge the met eireann and ramping thread after reading latest forecast on met.ie :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,119 ✭✭✭compsys


    Pangea wrote: »
    I propose a motion to merge the met eireann and ramping thread after reading latest forecast on met.ie :D

    Absolutely.

    Don't think I've ever read a forecast from Met E that's as positive for snow as that one.

    Mind you, it may all change again come the afternoon forecast but we'll see.

    We certainly seem to have the right conditions for snow: cold weather and precipitation. Whether dew points, uppers, and coastal breezes etc all play their part too is another thing of course...


  • Registered Users Posts: 777 ✭✭✭H2UMrsRobinson


    compsys wrote: »

    Absolutely.

    Don't think I've ever read a forecast from Met E that's as positive for snow as that one.

    Mind you, it may all change again come the afternoon forecast but we'll see.

    We certainly seem to have the right conditions for snow: cold weather and precipitation. Whether dew points, uppers, and coastal breezes etc all play their part too is another thing of course...

    I know it's crazy. Despondency all over the place in the event and ramp threads and a comparative snow fest by ME. Clearly the two are inversely proportionate.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,359 ✭✭✭whiteandlight


    I read the threads here and was a bit disappointed and expecting nothing. Then I read met eireann and was like wtf?!

    Here's hoping anyways!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,119 ✭✭✭compsys


    Well already a slight downgrade by Met E with the afternoon forecast. That didn't take long.

    More talk of sleet and fewer showers forecast for the rest of today and Sunday.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,298 ✭✭✭Duggys Housemate


    mattser wrote: »

    And that, as the man says, is that. UNRELIABLE.

    Everybody is concentrating on one forecast by one presenter on one news program by Met Eireann. One when the models were ambiguous. Then they mentioned snow on high ground.

    This "event" has been a non event. A few centimetres of wet on high ground in Cavan with no effect on travel ( because it is snow and freezing temperatures which causes problems. Not slush) notwithstanding.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 197 ✭✭Eastcoastryan


    Everybody is concentrating on one forecast by one presenter on one news program by Met Eireann. One when the models were ambiguous. Then they mentioned snow on high ground.

    This "event" has been a non event. A few centimetres of wet on high ground in Cavan with no effect on travel ( because it is snow and freezing temperatures which causes problems. Not slush) notwithstanding.

    I live in Wicklow and there was a hell of alot of snow so your statement is untrue! Sounds to me like you didn't get the snow you were hoping for! ;)


  • Registered Users Posts: 32 DanRu


    Jean , your the best! Small few flakes coming my way later. Service with a smile


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,745 ✭✭✭whitebriar


    A really superb forecast presentation again from Siobhan Ryan there at 930.
    she was able to explain and gently tell including using the word zonal,mentioned risk to cover whether a system would cross the south or not and give a little hope without raising it saying pointers to things settling down after the weekend.
    Lovely language and a joy to watch,a template if ever there was one on how to train new forecasters to use the time allotted with so much going on.
    10 out of ten.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 197 ✭✭Eastcoastryan


    whitebriar wrote: »
    A really superb forecast presentation again from Siobhan Ryan there at 930.
    she was able to explain and gently tell including using the word zonal,mentioned risk to cover whether a system would cross the south or not and give a little hope without raising it saying pointers to things settling down after the weekend.
    Lovely language and a joy to watch,a template if ever there was one on how to train new forecasters to use the time allotted with so much going on.
    10 out of ten.

    She's easy on the eye too WB.. She gets bonus points for that ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 180 ✭✭odyboody


    Just noticed the new warning system on met web site. Nicely laid out with a good description of what eqch colour represents.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 331 ✭✭Harry Deerpark


    odyboody wrote: »
    Just noticed the new warning system on met web site. Nicely laid out with a good description of what eqch colour represents.

    I wonder what type of weather warrants a "STATUS RED"?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 180 ✭✭odyboody


    Click on the link Explanation of new warning levels beside the warning.
    Good discription of what it means


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 331 ✭✭Harry Deerpark


    odyboody wrote: »
    Click on the link Explanation of new warning levels beside the warning.
    Good discription of what it means

    Ah, I didn't read it throughly. Winter 2010 is definitely a status red - wouldn't be for central European countries, though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,565 ✭✭✭Pangea


    Nice to see the new warning system in place, I of course take full credit for the change :P.
    Pangea wrote: »
    I think they should have a warning system for regions similar to the met office uks.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,354 ✭✭✭✭Larbre34


    Ah, I didn't read it throughly. Winter 2010 is definitely a status red - wouldn't be for central European countries, though.

    To be fair it wouldn't, the snow was extensive and inconvenient but it didn't require specific action to protect life and/or property. Transport and water disruption and the odd lost gobsheen who went hill walking in deep snow were about the worst things to happen.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,565 ✭✭✭Pangea


    Larbre34 wrote: »
    To be fair it wouldn't, the snow was extensive and inconvenient but it didn't require specific action to protect life and/or property. Transport and water disruption and the odd lost gobsheen who went hill walking in deep snow were about the worst things to happen.

    Thats debatable, people could of done a few things to keep water pipes from freezing that time etc


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 331 ✭✭Harry Deerpark


    Larbre34 wrote: »
    To be fair it wouldn't, the snow was extensive and inconvenient but it didn't require specific action to protect life and/or property. Transport and water disruption and the odd lost gobsheen who went hill walking in deep snow were about the worst things to happen.

    I totally agree with you. When I first read it: hurricanes, tornadoes and blizzards all came to mind, but read Met Eireann's definition of a severe weather warning:
    Weather Element Criteria for Red - Severe Weather Warnings

    1. Wind: Mean Speeds in excess of 80 km/h. Gusts Speeds in excess of 130 km/h
    2. Rain: 70mm or greater in 24 hrs. 50mm or greater in 12 hrs. 40mm or greater in 6 hrs
    3. Snow/Ice: Significant falls of snow likely to cause accumulations of 8 cm or greater below 250 m AMSL. Slippery paths and roads due to accumulation of ice on untreated surfaces; situation likely to worsen.
    4. Low Temperatures: Minima of minus 10C or lower expected. Maxima of minus 2C or lower expected.
    5. Fog: No Criterion – not displayed.
    6. High Temperature: As Orange criterion, but persisting for two or more consecutive nights.
    7. Thunderstorms: No Criterion – not displayed.
    8. Coastal Wind Warnings: Violent Storm Force 11 or greater. (Mean Speeds)

    There's a lot of 2010 in there.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,565 ✭✭✭Pangea


    Should be an interesting Farming forecast tomorrow, a nightmare to forecast I suppose.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,565 ✭✭✭Pangea


    Bump to this thread, might come in handy over the weekend.
    We should have some sort of competition as to which televised ME forecast will be the first to mention accumulations, or better yet the word snow :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,693 ✭✭✭Redsunset


    The farming on Sunday should be good.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,184 ✭✭✭Elmer Blooker


    a very informative forecast there from Gerry - "temperatures falling back into single figures" :confused:
    Temperatures where I am have been in single figures since February 16th!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,745 ✭✭✭whitebriar


    I deleted my post in the main thread as its more relevant here.Two contrasting radio one forecasts today
    Siobhan Ryan this morning-dusting of snow slight risk of disruption monday

    John Eagleton lunchtime - Cold easterly winds,temperature dropping well back.
    No mention of showers by him and no mention of snow,even in the sea area part where you'd think visibility would be important.


    Are met Eireann independent contractors now,do they talk to each other at all?

    This is all highly unprofessional,it seems to me,not alone for the inconsistency between the two,but also for what seems to be a complete brush over of what we(regular posters here) see in the models.
    If I'm wrong,I will admit it,but at present,this seems a valid criticism,I cannot understand their approach.

    I wouldn't be expecting them to use Mt craniums expectations/risk but for heavens sake...Could they at least be consistent in the message between forecasts and at this juncture inform the public in the east and south of the risk.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,428 ✭✭✭ZX7R


    whitebriar wrote: »
    I deleted my post in the main thread as its more relevant here.Two contrasting radio one forecasts today
    Siobhan Ryan this morning-dusting of snow slight risk of disruption monday

    John Eagleton lunchtime - Cold easterly winds,temperature dropping well back.
    No mention of showers by him and no mention of snow,even in the sea area part where you'd think visibility would be important.


    Are met Eireann independent contractors now,do they talk to each other at all?

    This is all highly unprofessional,it seems to me,not alone for the inconsistency between the two,but also for what seems to be a complete brush over of what we(regular posters here) see in the models.
    If I'm wrong,I will admit it,but at present,this seems a valid criticism,I cannot understand their approach.

    I wouldn't be expecting them to use Mt craniums expectations/risk but for heavens sake...Could they at least be consistent in the message between forecasts and at this juncture inform the public in the east and south of the risk.
    My brother in law works in eircom ,he recived an e-mail stating distroutive weather from sunday night with sivere cold and liying snow,to have his van ready for the conditions ect. met eireann
    and some english companie issue the warning's for the companie.
    doesent sound like that in there forecast :confused:


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88,972 ✭✭✭✭mike65


    a very informative forecast there from Gerry - "temperatures falling back into single figures" :confused:
    Temperatures where I am have been in single figures since February 16th!!

    Sure its been 12-13 Celsius in parts of the wesht according to Met Error


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 270 ✭✭Bejubby


    Over to RTE1 for the 9oc news and weather.
    Gerry,Siobhan or Evelyn hmmmm


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,708 ✭✭✭Speak Now


    Bejubby wrote: »
    Over to RTE1 for the 9oc news and weather.
    Gerry,Siobhan or Evelyn hmmmm
    whoever it was after news at 6!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,684 ✭✭✭Darwin


    whoever it was after news at 6!!

    Gerry "the schleet" Murphy


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 270 ✭✭Bejubby


    Schnowww


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,708 ✭✭✭Speak Now


    Bejubby wrote: »
    Schnowww
    Possibly!!!!! ;-)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,565 ✭✭✭Pangea


    Well how was the farming forecast?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,682 ✭✭✭Rougies


    Pangea wrote: »
    Well how was the farming forecast?

    http://www.rte.ie/player/ie/show/10118969/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,483 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    Tried to resist posting on this, as I think they generally do alright, but a few posts congratulating them on calling the last day or so right have kinda got on my wick. Plenty of people here called a risk of snow, but at least very cold temperatures for Sunday/ Monday/ Today last week (Wednesday iirc was when model consensus). Met were way behind the curve on giving the public proper notice imo.

    Calling it on Sunday morning isn't giving people proper notice of the risk of severe cold and snow - they basically left it to a nowcast situation. Whatever about the general public, they could've given farmers and people that do rely on the weather more notice. They don't have to get into percentages - just tell the truth that they can't be certain, but the models are showing the possibility of much colder weather, just to give people a heads up.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,298 ✭✭✭Duggys Housemate


    Macy0161 wrote: »
    Tried to resist posting on this, as I think they generally do alright, but a few posts congratulating them on calling the last day or so right have kinda got on my wick. Plenty of people here called a risk of snow, but at least very cold temperatures for Sunday/ Monday/ Today last week (Wednesday iirc was when model consensus). Met were way behind the curve on giving the public proper notice imo.

    Calling it on Sunday morning isn't giving people proper notice of the risk of severe cold and snow - they basically left it to a nowcast situation. Whatever about the general public, they could've given farmers and people that do rely on the weather more notice. They don't have to get into percentages - just tell the truth that they can't be certain, but the models are showing the possibility of much colder weather, just to give people a heads up.

    There was no accumulations where I am. Dublin. If Met Eireann did anything wrong it was over-estimating the risk of accumulation on their Sunday forecasts. They did predict the cold.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,483 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    There was no accumulations where I am. Dublin. If Met Eireann did anything wrong it was over-estimating the risk of accumulation on their Sunday forecasts. They did predict the cold.
    They were still going with dry late last week, and then gradually upgraded until Sunday's 3-8cm possible. And some places did get that. My point remains, they shouldn't be getting slaps on the back given their forecasts on Thursday and Friday of last week, which really underplayed how things were looking and how things actually materialised. Even leaving aside the snow, they had to (apparently) be prompted to mention the windchill, which would be a big consideration for the elderly and for those keeping animals.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,298 ✭✭✭Duggys Housemate


    Macy0161 wrote: »
    They were still going with dry late last week, and then gradually upgraded until Sunday's 3-8cm possible. And some places did get that. My point remains, they shouldn't be getting slaps on the back given their forecasts on Thursday and Friday of last week, which really underplayed how things were looking and how things actually materialised. Even leaving aside the snow, they had to (apparently) be prompted to mention the windchill, which would be a big consideration for the elderly and for those keeping animals.

    Outside of this forum this is how people saw the forecast last week.

    Met Eireann predict cold for Monday.
    They predict "wintry showers" for Monday.
    On Sunday they upgraded.
    The upgrade was wrong, everything else was right. We got wintry showers of little import for most.

    As for windchill, they mentioned that in all forecasts I watched. I watched most reports from Thursday to see what they were predicting.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,027 ✭✭✭MidMan25


    Macy0161 wrote: »
    Tried to resist posting on this, as I think they generally do alright, but a few posts congratulating them on calling the last day or so right have kinda got on my wick. Plenty of people here called a risk of snow, but at least very cold temperatures for Sunday/ Monday/ Today last week (Wednesday iirc was when model consensus). Met were way behind the curve on giving the public proper notice imo.

    Calling it on Sunday morning isn't giving people proper notice of the risk of severe cold and snow - they basically left it to a nowcast situation. Whatever about the general public, they could've given farmers and people that do rely on the weather more notice. They don't have to get into percentages - just tell the truth that they can't be certain, but the models are showing the possibility of much colder weather, just to give people a heads up.

    If they were to give people a heads up about the possibility of colder weather then they would have ended up doing this quite a few times this year with most times resulting in nothing. Surely that sort of approach to forecasting would have much the same effect of damaging their reputation in the eyes of certain people.

    Damned if you do, damned if you don't and all that..

    In the end of the day they are the professionals and anybody who thinks that they can't do as good a job as amateur forecasters on forums is deluded. It doesn't take a brave man to call the weather for 5 days time on a forum when he doesn't have a whole lot to lose.

    I assume Met Eireann operate according to strict protocols and are expected to take a sensible approach to forecasting the weather. As far as I'm concerned they do this.

    By god we're a nation of moaners. We'll moan about anything. Almost as bad as the French :pac: ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,483 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    Outside of this forum this is how people saw the forecast last week.

    Met Eireann predict cold for Monday.
    They predict "wintry showers" for Monday.
    On Sunday they upgraded.
    The upgrade was wrong, everything else was right. We got wintry showers of little import for most.

    As for windchill, they mentioned that in all forecasts I watched. I watched most reports from Thursday to see what they were predicting.
    I don't agree they flagged how cold it was, or how cold it was going to feel, but I'm just going to agree to disagree at this stage rather than get in circular argument. I think they've done ok over the winter as a whole and I haven't really joined in the bashing (and I am even relunctant now), but I definitely thought they underplayed the cold for the last day or two at the time period that people could've got prepared. That's going on comments from "real world" people as well.

    I think it was Wicklow Weather that phoned them about them not mentioning windchill, which either coincidentally or not, got added to subsequent forecasts after that call was made.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,483 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    MidMan25 wrote: »
    If they were to give people a heads up about the possibility of colder weather then they would have ended up doing this quite a few times this year with most times resulting in nothing. Surely that sort of approach to forecasting would have much the same effect of damaging their reputation in the eyes of certain people.

    Damned if you do, damned if you don't and all that..
    In my limited knowledge, I think this was the first time there was such model consensus for the winter, so I think it is a bit different. I'm reluctantly having a bash, and wouldn't have bothered only I don't agree with them getting congratulated for calling it when I don't think they did.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,027 ✭✭✭MidMan25


    Macy0161 wrote: »
    In my limited knowledge, I think this was the first time there was such model consensus for the winter, so I think it is a bit different. I'm reluctantly having a bash, and wouldn't have bothered only I don't agree with them getting congratulated for calling it when I don't think they did.

    I suppose there was model consensus for cold but the finer details are always harder to pin down especially precipitation types. Haven't seen anyone congratulating them but if that's the case then it's a bit silly! They did their job to the required standard nothing more nothing less as far as I'm concerned.

    I must remember to congratulate the cashier next time she gives me the right change ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,119 ✭✭✭compsys


    Macy0161 wrote: »
    In my limited knowledge, I think this was the first time there was such model consensus for the winter, so I think it is a bit different. I'm reluctantly having a bash, and wouldn't have bothered only I don't agree with them getting congratulated for calling it when I don't think they did.

    In fairness this was a 36 hour coold snap at best. Even today temps are back up to around 5 degrees. It was hardly anything to write home about or issue warnings for.

    I also doubt the cold weather inconvenienced many people yesterday. Snow was slight to moderate and conditions were bearable. It wasn't anything to start issuing warnings for.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,008 ✭✭✭icesnowfrost


    Have a read of this


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,583 ✭✭✭✭M.T. Cranium


    There was of course some fairly significant snowfall in two regions (in the ROI) from reports on Boards, namely the southeast corner including Waterford city and a zone in Meath-Offaly. But even outside those zones, just because snow didn't accumulate to any great depth doesn't mean it had no impact. People still had to drive in it, and some ice resulted on pavement. The impact on agriculture was probably quite significant.

    Without Boards, I feel that most of Ireland would have been rather surprised by the amount of snow (in the air) and to some extent the degree of the chill. Maybe not, but we made an effort to assess things and I honestly feel it was a reasonable effort, maybe we got a bit unlucky with the snow not accumulating (those of us including myself who were saying accumulations, that is, some were not). Maybe it is better to be wrong on the conservative side, that is obviously the philosophy of most government weather services. The market will determine these things if in fact there really is a market and not a rigged monopoly. You'll have to decide which of those you have, I'm too far away to give an opinion on it. Here in Canada, I have felt for a long time that the economics are tilted towards a monopoly; in the U.S.A. the tradition of private forecasting is far more advanced. If nothing else, the private forecaster has nowhere to hide when things go south, in a large organization somebody confronted about a bad forecast can always say, "I wasn't on duty that day" although "the models" are always the whipping boys of choice.

    Anyway, from my perspective, any errors were based simply on subjective interpretation, I think it was fairly obvious what was going to happen in terms of structure, but things were just marginally too dry (more than being too warm) for the snow produced to stick on the ground in most of Dublin. I find it a bit mystifying because Dublin is at 53 deg N and snow sticks on the ground at 2 C in New England at 43 deg N, you would think the small amount of insolation getting through there would be at least the equal but maybe the sun tries a bit harder over Europe knowing how many regulatory agencies there are. The sun knows that American courts are too busy with serious matters to get on his (its/her) case.

    Or maybe it's those ley lines.


  • Registered Users Posts: 33 Sensual Cucumber


    There was of course some fairly significant snowfall in two regions (in the ROI) from reports on Boards, namely the southeast corner including Waterford city and a zone in Meath-Offaly. But even outside those zones, just because snow didn't accumulate to any great depth doesn't mean it had no impact. People still had to drive in it, and some ice resulted on pavement. The impact on agriculture was probably quite significant.

    Without Boards, I feel that most of Ireland would have been rather surprised by the amount of snow (in the air) and to some extent the degree of the chill. Maybe not, but we made an effort to assess things and I honestly feel it was a reasonable effort, maybe we got a bit unlucky with the snow not accumulating (those of us including myself who were saying accumulations, that is, some were not). Maybe it is better to be wrong on the conservative side, that is obviously the philosophy of most government weather services. The market will determine these things if in fact there really is a market and not a rigged monopoly. You'll have to decide which of those you have, I'm too far away to give an opinion on it. Here in Canada, I have felt for a long time that the economics are tilted towards a monopoly; in the U.S.A. the tradition of private forecasting is far more advanced. If nothing else, the private forecaster has nowhere to hide when things go south, in a large organization somebody confronted about a bad forecast can always say, "I wasn't on duty that day" although "the models" are always the whipping boys of choice.

    Anyway, from my perspective, any errors were based simply on subjective interpretation, I think it was fairly obvious what was going to happen in terms of structure, but things were just marginally too dry (more than being too warm) for the snow produced to stick on the ground in most of Dublin. I find it a bit mystifying because Dublin is at 53 deg N and snow sticks on the ground at 2 C in New England at 43 deg N, you would think the small amount of insolation getting through there would be at least the equal but maybe the sun tries a bit harder over Europe knowing how many regulatory agencies there are. The sun knows that American courts are too busy with serious matters to get on his (its/her) case.

    Or maybe it's those ley lines.

    Keep up the good work MT, its much better to be wrong on the ramping side than the conservative side. Dublin spent the majority of the day in the shadow of the IOM so really there was only light flurries and not one heavy shower. It was actually heavier 2 weeks ago. The flurries did stick but there was so little that the sun between the showers melted it. A frustrating day overall..story of the winter


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,565 ✭✭✭Pangea


    Goes to show how sporadic some of met.ies forecasts can be, met eireann mentioning significant snow risk this early. I wonder how long will that last on the forecast? Perhaps someone having a laugh while Gerry is off for a day or two. Nothing mentioned on the tv forecasts yet which is to be expected . It would be nice to see a white St Patricks day, it would be quite a novel event.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement