Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Wokeism of the day *Revised Mod Note in OP and threadbanned users*

11819212324241

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,477 ✭✭✭AllForIt


    .anon. wrote: »
    .............right-wing buzzwords like 'woke' and 'identity politics' barely exist outside of the internet and most people couldn't care less about that kind of stuff, one way or the other..........

    When I was last in Penny's they had a selection of T-shirts with WOKE printed across the front.


  • Registered Users Posts: 630 ✭✭✭COVID


    AllForIt wrote: »
    When I was last in Penny's they had a selection of T-shirts with WOKE printed across the front.

    On the pyjamas too?


  • Registered Users Posts: 10,943 ✭✭✭✭the purple tin


    AllForIt wrote: »
    When I was last in Penny's they had a selection of T-shirts with WOKE printed across the front.
    Made in some Asian sweat-shop no doubt. :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,135 ✭✭✭Cordell


    Sweatshop sound offensive, let's use something like unsustainable workforce exploitation workshop.
    You know, because WE CARE
    ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 608 ✭✭✭nofools


    I was wondering how Trump got so close to getting reelected - he really did, the flip states have razor-thin margins. I was thinking “Nearly half the people who voted, voted for him. I refuse to believe that half the people who voted are bigots and racists”. So, what happened? How did that goober get so close to a second term? Then I saw an interesting exit poll statistic. Something like 88% of people who voted for Trump cited identity politics as a reason. People are fed up of being made to feel guilty for being white, fed up of being put in a box and expected to think and vote a certain way simply because they are an ethnic minority, sick of being called transphobic for minor reasons. People are tired of being judged and admonished by their “betters” when actually, I think most people are pretty decent and just want to live their lives with as little hassle as possible.

    I thought that stat was really interesting. Identity politics fatigue played a big part in almost returning Trump to the White House. I actually said to my OH a few times in the last few months that I was worried that Biden and Harris’s flirting with ID politics would alienate voters who have much more pressing worries but I doesn’t think it would actually happen.

    An extreme on one side only invites more to form on the other side.

    This site was good fun years ago and now is just a battleground for partisan arguments across every issue.

    People living in Ireland with extreme views on issues that don't even affect us.

    Hate begets more hate


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    nofools wrote: »
    An extreme on one side only invites more to form on the other side.

    This site was good fun years ago and now is just a battleground for partisan arguments across every issue.

    People living in Ireland with extreme views on issues that don't even affect us.

    Hate begets more hate

    I disagree. You shouldnt only deeply care about issues that directly concern you. I personally think that is a selfish attitude and also one I can guarantee you don't live by. I'm sure you have very strong opinions on issues that don't impact directly on your life.

    Strongly disagreeing with something is now being called hate. There's the problem. Debate is now stifled as hate or being "extreme" about something that shouldn't concern you.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 608 ✭✭✭nofools


    I disagree. You shouldnt only deeply care about issues that directly concern you. I personally think that is a selfish attitude and also one I can guarantee you don't live by. I'm sure you have very strong opinions on issues that don't impact directly on your life.

    Strongly disagreeing with something is now being called hate. There's the problem. Debate is now stifled as hate or being "extreme" about something that shouldn't concern you.

    That is not so much what i am getting at it.

    To make the example, I see a freshly minted misogynist type as the birth child of a radical feminist (a reflexive reactionary type thing).

    Every second thread in after hours/ca paints this picture.

    I think we can all see the difference between someone with a strong opinion or someone who has developed their entire persona around a topic and lives and breaths it to the point of singular obsession. Opinion vs hate.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    nofools wrote: »
    That is not so much what i am getting at it.

    To make the example, I see a freshly minted misogynist type as the birth child a radical feminist (a reflexive reactionary type thing).

    Every single thread in after hours/ca paints this picture.

    I don't mean to be rude, and it may be my Sunday mind not clicking into gear, but I have re-read that post a few times and can't figure out what you mean.

    *Edit* sorry maybe I can. I think you are saying that misogynistic behaviour is fuelled by third wave feminism and vice versa.

    I kind of agree and disagree again. I think the definition of misogyny and indeed feminism have been hijacked.

    I completely agree that men and women should be afforded the same opportunities but are different genders. By definition, that makes me a feminist. But the fact that I don't agree there is a gender pay gap and that I don't believe in a patriarchy, makes me at odds with what is socially referred to as a feminist.

    I just believe in equal treatment. And that sometime gets me called far right.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 608 ✭✭✭nofools


    I don't mean to be rude, and it may be my Sunday mind not clicking into gear, but I have re-read that post a few times and can't figure out what you mean.

    *Edit* sorry maybe I can. I think you are saying that misogynistic behaviour is fuelled by third wave feminism and vice versa.

    I kind of agree and disagree again. I think the definition of misogyny and indeed feminism have been hijacked.

    I completely agree that men and women should be afforded the same opportunities but are different genders. By definition, that makes me a feminist. But the fact that I don't agree there is a gender pay gap and that I don't believe in a patriarchy, makes me at odds with what is socially referred to as a feminist.

    I just believe in equal treatment. And that sometime gets me called far right.

    No interest in the topic itself, just be a good person.

    But yes i think you are following me.. two antagonistic sides just spawn more of each other and everyone in the sensible middle suffers the consequences.

    American politics , case in point


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    nofools wrote: »
    No interest in the topic itself, just be a good person.

    But yes i think you are following me.. two antagonistic sides just spawn more of each other and everyone in the sensible middle suffers the consequences.

    American politics , case in point

    No I get you. Sorry man, been a long day.

    Yeah I agree.

    It's just a shame that debate is being stifled. Truth doesn't really matter to either side and their "team" winning is all that counts.

    I agree. Be the best person you can be. If that upsets a couple of *****, **** them. Just do your own personal best each day.

    Respect.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,612 ✭✭✭Gervais08


    I am heartily ****ing sick of being called “cis”. It’s offensive to me as a woman.

    Even more pissed off to report it and see it allowed. Double standards by Boards.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Gervais08 wrote: »
    I am heartily ****ing sick of being called “cis”. It’s offensive to me as a woman.

    Even more pissed off to report it and see it allowed. Double standards by Boards.

    With all due respect..........






    Nah I agree (surprise!!!!!)

    I can't see why you are offended by the term, but I am a little perplexed by why this term is now common vernacular despite most people it refers to not being happy by it.

    Pronouns in their bio excluded, who the **** refers to themselves as cis?

    *Edit

    If cis is a thing, can we finally have cis pride day? Because I'd happily counter protest it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 81,220 ✭✭✭✭biko




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,956 ✭✭✭✭Omackeral


    ''Of Color/Colour''

    Society can f*ck right off with that. This need to put people in neat boxes because of their skin pigment is absolutely repugnant. Dr King said the exact opposite in his famous speech and yet here we are. A complete 180 from those who would no doubt purport to idolise him.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,463 ✭✭✭Leftyflip


    Gervais08 wrote: »
    I am heartily ****ing sick of being called “cis”. It’s offensive to me as a woman.

    Even more pissed off to report it and see it allowed. Double standards by Boards.

    Ah cis, where these social justice, virtue signalling nutters have taken a totally random term and decided to apply it to every day normal people.

    I'm not a "cis man", I'm a man. My wife isn't a "cis woman", she's a woman.

    Also, the phrase "uterus holders" or "people with a cervix", since when is woman a dirty word? F*ck off like, stop it with this nonsense.:rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 830 ✭✭✭ArrBee


    When are we going to wake up!

    The patriarchy, for too long, has been oppressing women in sport by forcing them to play with balls!
    The time has come for all balls to be removed from woman's sport*









    *obviously men declaring as women in sport are still allowed to have balls. :P


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    biko wrote: »
    Well of course. It was only a matter of time. Because some might have to start asking the uncomfortable questions around why non White European Yellow Asian folks on average do better than both American POC and White Americans in a predominantly White culture where Asian Americans have suffered racism and exclusion for a very long time. If I were to bet, I reckon those from India will be quietly moved out of the POC label soon enough and for similar reasons. It's not "race" either, as those of a Pakistani background are less likely on average to have similar educational standards and wealth to Indians, yet are the same "race". Hell, recent Black African immigrants to the US do better than Black African Americans on average.

    What the American culture and what it actually means to be "American" shows is a deeply rooted obsession with "race" and a deeply rooted racism with it and that the melting pot is melting and their internal narratives around it latterly are disappearing up their own arses trying to explain and wish that away.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Omackeral wrote: »
    ''Of Color/Colour''

    Society can f*ck right off with that. This need to put people in neat boxes because of their skin pigment is absolutely repugnant. Dr King said the exact opposite in his famous speech and yet here we are. A complete 180 from those who would no doubt purport to idolise him.
    I was always more a Malcolm X man myself O. He was more into cutting through the bullsh1t of melting pot America and how the Black man and woman were excluded from it and how having a dream was all very well, but that's all it was and as has been shown since one that people need to wake up from.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,719 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    Aaaaand the contempt for voting people and their intellect continues. We’ve seen so much of that in the last four years. This is a lesson that will never be learned.

    I’m so glad that Biden got over line but the slim margin of his victory should cause reflection. He barely beat Trump. Trump’s election four years ago was shown to not be an aberration. He came close again after four years in office. Why is that? Aren’t you interested to find out? Nah, much easier to write off half the voting population as dullards instead of trying to understand them.

    There is a video by Bill Maher asking the Democrats to reflect on their poor result:

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SgrZAPUvKyA





  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,956 ✭✭✭✭Omackeral


    Leftyflip wrote: »
    I'm not a "cis man", I'm a man. My wife isn't a "cis woman", she's a woman.

    Also, the phrase "uterus holders" or "people with a cervix", since when is woman a dirty word? F*ck off like, stop it with this nonsense.:rolleyes:

    Actually, I think you'll find it's womxn now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 310 ✭✭Osborne




  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,612 ✭✭✭Gervais08


    Omackeral wrote: »
    Actually, I think you'll find it's womxn now.

    Over my dead adult female human body!!!!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,612 ✭✭✭Gervais08




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,812 ✭✭✭✭sbsquarepants


    Osborne wrote: »


    Janet sounds like the sort of woke womxn who has never had the misfortune of having to deal with the shatters on a regular basis, or live near a trouble free picturesque shatter camp:D


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,896 ✭✭✭sabat


    So does she refer to our former minister for justice as Alan Knacker?


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Gervais08 wrote: »
    Jesus ****ing wept ...!!
    I didn't even click it. These days I see twitter and think, oh boy, heeeeere we go... I rarely bother.

    The Interwebs and social media potentially gives a platform to all with a connection and that's great, but it also gives a platform to the clubs of oddballs, the unhinged, the naive, the neurotic, the dangerous, the thick, the zealots, and the shysters that we wouldn't otherwise have to deal with very often. What is common to that collection of people is they almost never see themselves as members. I take some solace in knowing that I know I'm a thundering gobsh1te and that's fine. :D

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users Posts: 8,711 ✭✭✭keano_afc




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 53,028 ✭✭✭✭ButtersSuki


    Janet sounds like the sort of woke womxn who has never had the misfortune of having to deal with the shatters on a regular basis, or live near a trouble free picturesque shatter camp:D

    No, it's not Ciara Kelly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,135 ✭✭✭Cordell


    Janet sounds like the sort of woke womxn who has never had the misfortune of having to deal with the shatters on a regular basis, or live near a trouble free picturesque shatter camp:D

    What about stop calling SUVs Jeeps? I mean, jeep, jeepsy, it's definitely loaded.
    Also, it assumes a particular carmaker, which takes away from their identities.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Osborne wrote: »

    The little tagline under her name nearly had my eyes roll out of my head

    “Omninerd, infovore, AntiFascist, GenX, White/cis/bi/sí/í. If I can't have My Reproductive Rights then it's not My Revolution.”

    “Infovore”...won’t be long now before her head travels so far up her own arse that she collapses in on herself like a neutron star


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 8,492 ✭✭✭Sir Oxman


    Osborne wrote: »

    The middle class awfulness of yer one is a sight to behold!
    When there is less and less actual racism, every performative dope will declare it everywhere.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,170 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    I've read and heard the Infovore* tag before and I found in every single case the only information the tag bearer was interested in was that which agreed with their already fully formed worldview. Dogmavore might be the better descriptor as dogma never reads much beyond its official catechism. To do so is heresy.





    *mad into consuming information.

    Rejoice in the awareness of feeling stupid, for that’s how you end up learning new things. If you’re not aware you’re stupid, you probably are.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    biko wrote: »

    Asians have always been seen as Uncle Toms by race grifters, what with their proclivity for two parent families, getting on in life and woefully low incarceration rates they're little more than collaborators in the systemic oppression of real peoples of colour.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,956 ✭✭✭✭Omackeral


    Bambi wrote: »
    Asians have always been seen as Uncle Toms by race grifters, what with their proclivity for two parent families, getting on in life and woefully low incarceration rates they're little more than collaborators in the systemic oppression of real peoples of colour.

    They tend to just get on over here too. Rarely ever hear of Chinese gangs of roaming youths wrecking the gaff.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 355 ✭✭46 Long


    Welcome to 2020, where 'I <3 JK Rowling' is now considered hate speech

    34157028-8819877-image-a-22_1602172768004.jpg


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,612 ✭✭✭Gervais08


    46 Long wrote: »
    Welcome to 2020, where 'I <3 JK Rowling' is now considered hate speech

    34157028-8819877-image-a-22_1602172768004.jpg

    We are ****ed!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,630 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    Leftyflip wrote: »
    Ah cis, where these social justice, virtue signalling nutters have taken a totally random term and decided to apply it to every day normal people.

    I'm not a "cis man", I'm a man. My wife isn't a "cis woman", she's a woman.

    Also, the phrase "uterus holders" or "people with a cervix", since when is woman a dirty word? F*ck off like, stop it with this nonsense.:rolleyes:

    Isn't that a bit like saying "I'm not a hetrosexual, I'm straight"?

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    People who think female violence is as dangerous as male violence yet think transwomen are a danger to cis sexed women in sport.


    People who think muslims have an issue with terrorism. But if you point out most terrorists white brown christian muslim or whatever are all hetero males they go blank.

    They are so woke.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Omackeral wrote: »
    They tend to just get on over here too. Rarely ever hear of Chinese gangs of roaming youths wrecking the gaff.
    yet you would want to see the amount of racial abuse hazel chu gets online.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Gervais08 wrote: »
    We are ****ed!

    Just insert Colm Meaney clips here .

    I'm a man ( nah it's offensive now )

    I'm a male ( nah it's offensive now )

    Watching Harry potter tonight (that's now offensive)

    People on twitter (nah offensive )

    Mumsnet ( offensive)


    Elvis Presley (ah jayus )


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Why is it that people think the phrase ..man up is offensive? I think that is daft.


    I mean its usually said to someone ..usually male ..who is acting in a childish manner.

    Its like saying ..be more like a lady ..when said to a woman. Like be more gracious.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,612 ✭✭✭Gervais08


    Isn't that a bit like saying "I'm not a hetrosexual, I'm straight"?

    No, I say straight but heterosexual isn’t an insult. Cis is used as a slur.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Gervais08 wrote: »
    Cis is used as a slur.
    I dont feel its a slur and i am cis.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,612 ✭✭✭Gervais08


    I dont feel its a slur and i am cis.

    Snoop Dogg doesn’t think the n word is a slur. He’s black.

    And it very much is a slur.

    You don’t get to decide what is and is not offensive for everyone.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Gervais08 wrote: »
    Snoop Dogg doesn’t think the n word is a slur. He’s black.

    And it very much is a slur.

    You don’t get to decide what is and is not offensive for everyone.
    Who uses it as a slur?

    Also i think snoop dog does think the n word is a slur.

    I think its a slur not to call me a cis female to be honest. It means people won't know i was born and still identify as female 100%


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,612 ✭✭✭Gervais08


    Who uses it as a slur?

    Also i think snoop dog does think the n word is a slur.

    He uses it often enough to make me think he’s ok with it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,094 ✭✭✭.anon.


    Isn't that a bit like saying "I'm not a hetrosexual, I'm straight"?

    Let's be totally honest about the mindset here... it's like saying "I'm not 'straight', I'm normal".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,202 ✭✭✭✭ILoveYourVibes


    Gervais08 wrote: »
    He uses it often enough to make me think he’s ok with it.
    mm nope ..he says n ending with a ...not er ...diff word

    Its even spelt differently. And its in the dictionary. ALthough some think its one and the same word. But black people don't say it ending with er ....even if they don't have an accent using ebonics.

    Pretty sure if white people say it ...its not taken too kindly.

    I think its a slur not to call me a cis female to be honest. It means people won't know i was born and still identify as female 100%

    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/nigga


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,974 ✭✭✭Chris_Heilong


    Gervais08 wrote: »
    No, I say straight but heterosexual isn’t an insult. Cis is used as a slur.

    I agree and the people who support it usually think they are being "an ally" to the gay community, In fact it does not aid LGBT at all and makes those using the term sound like weirdos to everybody that does not follow this crap.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,765 ✭✭✭...Ghost...


    Who uses it as a slur?

    Also i think snoop dog does think the n word is a slur.

    I think its a slur not to call me a cis female to be honest. It means people won't know i was born and still identify as female 100%

    Ah the youth with time to kill will find woke appealing and post many times

    Stay Free



This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement