Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Enda Kenny to make irish optional?

1235789

Comments

  • #202
    Insect Overlord
    Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 30,915 Mod ✭✭✭✭Insect Overlord


    Tá an snáith seo gan dóchas ar fad ag an bpointe seo. Ní féidir árgóint le duine muna bhfuil ciall á dtaispeáint aige/aici. Táim chun imeacht agus taitneamh a bhaint as an teanga, seachas am a chur amú le hamadachas mar seo.

    D'éinne a chreideann go bhfuil an Ghaeilge marbh, tóg uair chun an clár fáisnéise seo a fheiceáil: Bliain in Inis Oírr. Tá an teanga beo beathach, is cuma cad a deir na daill.


  • #203
    Dan_Solo
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭✭Dan_Solo


    If you are incapable of arguing your position, that's fine, just say so. Don't pretend again that there's something about the tone of my posts that you have an issue with, as we all know you have ignored self-confessed trolling in this thread.
    I never said Irish was "dead", so you can join the misquote brigade too, in Irish or not. I said if it can only survive on handouts then it is dead for all intents and purposes.

    http://www.advertiser.ie/galway/article/15462
    A clinic for a population smaller than the average housing estate?
    Absolute economic madness. Maybe I should pass a few copies of the Buntús around the mainland for people who are stuck for years on waiting lists?


  • #204
    Krusader
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,057 ✭✭✭Krusader


    Dan_Solo wrote: »
    If you are incapable of arguing your position, that's fine, just say so. Don't pretend again that there's something about the tone of my posts that you have an issue with, as we all know you have ignored self-confessed trolling in this thread.
    I never said Irish was "dead", so you can join the misquote brigade too, in Irish or not. I said if it can only survive on handouts then it is dead for all intents and purposes.

    http://www.advertiser.ie/galway/article/15462
    A clinic for a population smaller than the average housing estate?
    Absolute economic madness. Maybe I should pass a few copies of the Buntús around the mainland for people who are stuck for years on waiting lists?

    Give us a copy i lost mine


  • #205
    deise go deo
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,677 ✭✭✭deise go deo


    Dan_Solo wrote: »
    I'm perfectly happy likewise for you to list "all" of those jobs which aren't state dependent that have an absolute requirement for Irish.
    If the best you can come up with is "you said all Irish requiring jobs are state dependent, but look! Look! I found 3 on earth that arent!!" then you're really arguing on my side of this whether you realise it or not.

    You claimed All jobs needing Irish were paid by the state, I provided examples that proved you wrong.

    In a fit of denial, You then claim to have proved me wrong, this is not the case. It seams you still cannot accept that you were wrong, but again, I am happy to get the quotes that show that you were.


  • #206
    Dan_Solo
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭✭Dan_Solo


    deise go deo wrote: »
    You claimed All jobs needing Irish were paid by the state, I provided examples that proved you wrong.

    In a fit of denial, You then claim to have proved me wrong, this is not the case. It seams you still cannot accept that you were wrong, but again, I am happy to get the quotes that show that you were.
    And yet again, feel free to quote your own list of private sector jobs where Irish is a requirement. See can you list enough to justify 50,000 students a year being forced to do Irish.
    What have you got, 10 of them tops?

    This is simple: you work out how many jobs that require Irish there are that aren't state dependent.
    If the amount is more than zero I was wrong to say there were zero (though I did say 99% were state dependent elsewhere. I'm sure you can find my 99% quote too?)
    If the amount is embarrassingly small, you have helped to prove that compulsory Irish is pointless.
    Your choice.


  • #207
    deise go deo
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,677 ✭✭✭deise go deo


    Dan_Solo wrote: »
    So a 2 to 1 majority do not want it compulsory fot the leaving cert? I can't see how that's much of a fillip for compulsory Irish advocates? The last figure is a clear positive bias twist... 89% of those who voted for Irish to be compulsory voted for it to be compulsory at second level? How is that a "surprise"?

    Well actually the latest survey shows 61% in favor of Irish remaining compulsory.
    You misunderstand the last bit, It dosent say 89% in favor of compulsion are in favor of compulsion to LC, It says that 89% of those in Favor of compulsion are in the 15 - 34 age bracket. Demonstrating that it is those with the most immidiat experience of Compulsory Irish that are in favor of it.
    In that age bracket, in that survey the majority were in Favor of compulsion.
    There is ZERO data presented here with regard to take up numbers of Irish post-Gaelscoil. Not one single bit.
    And I don't see the "irony" of people being forced to learn Irish then being able to speak Irish? Is that an "irony"?

    It is ironic that the system that has been blamed for the biggest failure in the promotion of irish is still the biggest factor in its Survival.
    As for data, Statments made like the one in that piece are considered to be relevant to discussion such as this.

    It is true that people leaving the Gaelscoil will most likely use English quite often, But it is also true that people leaving the Gaelscol will use Irish far more often than people leaving the ordinary education system.
    You can say no data to back up this, But then I can say where is you data to discredit it, Of the two sides, I have more to back up my position than you do.

    I agree totally. But you could say the same about doing a PhD in ancient Celtic studies. Would that make you more "Irish" than a mere Gaelgoir? No, it wouldn't. It might be entertaining personally to have these skills, but they are not a requirement, in my eyes, to be considered thoroughly and completely "Irish".


    The only requirement for being Irish is being bourn here and having Irish parents. That strict legalistic defination of 'Irish' however has nothing to do with cultural identity.


    The won't quote brigade here won't believe me, but I would be perfectly happy if Ireland was fully bilingual. I don't think it's wise to lose the Lingua Franca of English. I do not think however it is worth the effort of transition to this bilingual state. Our very culture makes kicking against the rules a badge of honour, so if you force Irish on us, we will rebel against it. It's human nature.


    Care to back this up? If it was true, then it seams we would be having this discussion in Irish, as English could never have been forced on the population in the First place.

    The simple fact is that a population will not change its language habits for simple love of the language. No matter how affectionat the population is to the language, it will not change for Love of that language, there are always other factors that are needed to motivate a language shift.

    In many surveys, time and again it has been shown that there is widespreas support for the preservation and promotion of Irish, including the provision of state services in Irish.

    All the parties are in Favor of promoting the language, this includes the spendng of money on it. (Twenty year plan) If you are against this, which it seams you are, then it is up to you to make your case as to why it should not be done, and preferably show that there is support for your ideas.

    The Welsh are an interesting case, where despite what would appear to be greater imposed cultural change from England, they have come back much more stringly than Irish. Someone from the Udaras should take a trip over and see what they're up to. If you can get even Premiership footballers to speak Welsh, you must be onto something!

    Welsh started from a much higher base. Irish fell to around 1.5% - 2.5%
    Welsh on the other hand never fell below 10%.
    Irish is growing again, but there is still a lot of ground to make up before the two are in comparable situations.

    With you on the hair's breath between FF and FG. I still don't see what's "in it" for Irish being compulsory. How does that make it a "living" language outside the traditionally Irish areas? As I asked earlier, if the government paid 100 people to speak Klingon, would it then become a "living" language? As I have already said (and misquote/no quote kids, try and read the whole sentence this time, right?) if Irish can *only* be kept alive through forced teaching, minimum "requirements" and government cheques, it is to all intents and purposes already dead.

    You seam to misunderstand what a dead language is.
    A dead language is a language that has no(Or is certain to loose in a short period) native speakers.

    Weather a government supports the language or not has nothing to do with it being alive or dead.

    Irish being compulsory dosent make it a living language, Irish having native speakers makes it a living language. The future of the language however will be affected if it is made optional without a full and proper reform of the curiculum first. The reason why is dealt with very well by leto here.


  • #208
    Dan_Solo
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭✭Dan_Solo


    deise go deo wrote: »
    Have you ever gone into a pub or a shop in the Gaelthacht? They use Irish there, Not paid by the state to do so, but paid by their boss, who gets his money from his paying Irish speaking Customers.
    I mean, just look at this. What exactly is that supposed to be an example of? Nowhere is there a mention of an Irish requirement. Is "they use Irish" now the same as "they would be unemployed except for their Irish"?


  • #209
    deise go deo
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,677 ✭✭✭deise go deo


    Dan_Solo wrote: »
    And yet again, feel free to quote your own list of private sector jobs where Irish is a requirement. See can you list enough to justify 50,000 students a year being forced to do Irish.
    What have you got, 10 of them tops?

    This is simple: you work out how many jobs that require Irish there are that aren't state dependent.
    If the amount is more than zero I was wrong to say there were zero (though I did say 99% were state dependent elsewhere. I'm sure you can find my 99% quote too?)
    If the amount is embarrassingly small, you have helped to prove that compulsory Irish is pointless.
    Your choice.


    Again you are simply moving the goalposts. I was proving that your statment that there are no jobs that are not funded directly by the state that require Irish wrong.

    That has nothing to do with justifying compulsory Irish.

    This is the second time you tried to shift the goalpoasts on this, It dident work the first time, why did you think it would this time?


  • #210
    Loco
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 742 ✭✭✭Loco


    My experience of non-optional Irish classes;

    I did honours Irish until 5th year, then dropped down to have it as my only pass subject, did a grind course where I learnt big chunks of text that I had no understanding of, purely to paste into my exam paper and got a B.

    I currently know as much Irish as I do Chinese, very little...

    The only positive I can think of, is after losing the will to live in an Irish class, I had improved concentration levels for all other classes!

    I'm struggling to think of any other benefits those hundreds of hours labouring (or staring blankly in most cases) through Irish classes gave me

    My opinion would be to introduce earlier Spanish/French/German lessons & allow Irish to be optional from Primary!

    Anyone know how German/Dutch language curriculums are any different? There are so many young fluent English speakers.

    I think it should be allowed to choose from an early age if you want to focus on one language aiming to achieve fluency, rather than being subjected to multiple mandatory basic courses that will be unused/forgotten when finished.


  • Advertisement
  • #211
    Salty
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,116 ✭✭✭Salty


    Dan_Solo wrote: »
    Respect works both ways?

    (and "thanks" from meehan)
    I notice that when people who you agree with are trolling, and admitting it, there isn't a peep out of you, so don't pretend you've a problem with me because of my "tone".

    I'm not trolling, actually. I'm standing up for something I love.
    Dan_Solo wrote: »
    Thanks, your post is worth a million of the kiddies' ones.

    Again, unneccesarily condescending. Put a stop to that, please.


    Dan_Solo wrote: »
    I still don't see what's "in it" for Irish being compulsory. How does that make it a "living" language outside the traditionally Irish areas? As I asked earlier, if the government paid 100 people to speak Klingon, would it then become a "living" language? As I have already said (and misquote/no quote kids, try and read the whole sentence this time, right?) if Irish can *only* be kept alive through forced teaching, minimum "requirements" and government cheques, it is to all intents and purposes already dead.

    What we want is reform of the way the language is taught, therefore keeping it compulsory would be perfectly acceptable because people wouldn't be forced to learn off poems and stories.

    Can you honestly say that changing the system would have no effect? (and before you say this is not what you're saying in the above quote, I've picked this quote because of your attack on the whole compulsory thing).

    If it was more focused on the language (and I have said this before) it would be a completely different situation. More people would be more fluent, and it would be no more difficult than doing French or German for the LC.


  • #212
    Dan_Solo
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭✭Dan_Solo


    deise go deo wrote: »
    Well actually the latest survey shows 61% in favor of Irish remaining compulsory.
    You mean the survey commissioned by an Irish language advocacy group which who's findings were almost the exact opposite of the one the year before? The one that showed more people thought English, Maths, Science, Geography and History were important subjects than Irish?
    deise go deo wrote: »
    You misunderstand the last bit, It dosent say 89% in favor of compulsion are in favor of compulsion to LC, It says that 89% of those in Favor of compulsion are in the 15 - 34 age bracket. Demonstrating that it is those with the most immidiat experience of Compulsory Irish that are in favor of it.
    In that age bracket, in that survey the majority were in Favor of compulsion.
    Which again is pretty much the opposite of the last poll. Somebody's asking the wrong questions.
    deise go deo wrote: »
    It is ironic that the system that has been blamed for the biggest failure in the promotion of irish is still the biggest factor in its Survival.
    But that doesn't make any case at all that compulsory Irish is a "good" thing, unless you're stated objective is to force people to speak a language the vast majority of them will never use. Sure, they can speak it, but maybe they will steadfastly refuse to purely because it was forced on them?
    deise go deo wrote: »
    It is true that people leaving the Gaelscoil will most likely use English quite often, But it is also true that people leaving the Gaelscol will use Irish far more often than people leaving the ordinary education system.
    You can say no data to back up this, But then I can say where is you data to discredit it, Of the two sides, I have more to back up my position than you do.
    No you don't. You say Gaelscoils promote habitual Irish usage. You have no evidence of this. I do *not* need to provide any evidence to the contrary to say you have absolutely nothing to back up your claim.
    deise go deo wrote: »
    The only requirement for being Irish is being bourn here and having Irish parents. That strict legalistic defination of 'Irish' however has nothing to do with cultural identity.
    That's the legal definition which nobody was questioning. You're having a conversation with yourself on that one.
    deise go deo wrote: »
    Care to back this up? If it was true, then it seams we would be having this discussion in Irish, as English could never have been forced on the population in the First place.
    http://insideireland.ie/2010/06/25/archive4457-4517/
    For example, 8% say they are fluent in Irish, and 8.4% say they want Irish to be the main spoken language of the country. 33.7% say they have a “middling” or “not so fluent” amount of Irish, and 33% say they want Irish to be revived, but with English remaining as the main language of the country.
    The remaining 58% say they have little or no Irish, with 52% wanting Irish preserved in the Gaeltacht and for cultural reasons and 6% wanting to abandon the language completely.
    This shows that for the most part people are putting their money where their mouth is in regards to speaking Irish.
    deise go deo wrote: »
    In many surveys, time and again it has been shown that there is widespreas support for the preservation and promotion of Irish, including the provision of state services in Irish.
    But nobody actually wants to speak it. Again, we're back to Irish as a pipe dream.
    deise go deo wrote: »
    All the parties are in Favor of promoting the language, this includes the spendng of money on it. (Twenty year plan) If you are against this, which it seams you are, then it is up to you to make your case as to why it should not be done, and preferably show that there is support for your ideas.
    Yes I am against this. My case is that it is a waste of money. The support for my ideas is in the surveys that show many people are not interested in Irish. I know how democracy works.
    deise go deo wrote: »
    Welsh started from a much higher base. Irish fell to around 1.5% - 2.5%
    Welsh on the other hand never fell below 10%.
    Irish is growing again, but there is still a lot of ground to make up before the two are in comparable situations.
    The debate on that remains whether compulsory Irish helps promote subsequent usage of Irish. This however is not really anything that interests me. I have no desire to promote or diminish Irish usage, if anything I'd prefer it to be more prevalent, but not at the expense of it being compulsory or a pointless drain on state resources.
    deise go deo wrote: »
    You seam to misunderstand what a dead language is.
    A dead language is a language that has no(Or is certain to loose in a short period) native speakers.
    Weather a government supports the language or not has nothing to do with it being alive or dead.
    But we are back to the 100 guys paid to speak Klingon. Or Quenya. Or l33t. Your definition has that as making it a "living" language. If it's that easy to "make" a "living" langauge then the life or death of a language is an exercise in cheque writing.
    deise go deo wrote: »
    Irish being compulsory dosent make it a living language, Irish having native speakers makes it a living language. The future of the language however will be affected if it is made optional without a full and proper reform of the curiculum first. The reason why is dealt with very well by leto here.
    I would like to see the continued use of the Irish language.
    I do not believe this is the state's responsibility.
    What makes a cultural imposition OK just because it is historically our culture?


  • #213
    Dan_Solo
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭✭Dan_Solo


    deise go deo wrote: »
    That has nothing to do with justifying compulsory Irish.
    Fine, you agree you have no case for justifying compulsory Irish.
    We get it already.


  • #214
    Dan_Solo
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭✭Dan_Solo


    Loco wrote: »
    Anyone know how German/Dutch language curriculums are any different? There are so many young fluent English speakers.
    This is pretty simple. German and Dutch kids realise from a very early age that English is useful, so they put some effort into learning it.
    Doesn't have to be anything special about the curriculum. It's the incentive.


  • #215
    gsnapp
    Closed Accounts Posts: 25 ✭gsnapp


    Wel Enda just secured my vote


  • #216
    Krusader
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,057 ✭✭✭Krusader


    gsnapp wrote: »
    Wel Enda just secured my vote

    Mine too, god damn irish wanting to teach irish in schools, they have a neck


  • Advertisement
  • #217
    deise go deo
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,677 ✭✭✭deise go deo


    Dan_Solo wrote: »
    You mean the survey commissioned by an Irish language advocacy group which who's findings were almost the exact opposite of the one the year before? The one that showed more people thought English, Maths, Science, Geography and History were important subjects than Irish?

    The poll was carried out by Ipsos MRBI, Are you claiming that they were biased in their polling?
    There wasent one the year before, The one before was carried out at the request of FG in 2005.
    I dont know where you are getting your info from with regards English maths Science etc, Please provide a ling as I dont think that was part of either survey. I hope you are not making stuff up.
    Which again is pretty much the opposite of the last poll. Somebody's asking the wrong questions.


    That was from the last poll in 2005, Someones not trying very hard to keep up. Do you even know what you are talking about here?
    But that doesn't make any case at all that compulsory Irish is a "good" thing, unless you're stated objective is to force people to speak a language the vast majority of them will never use. Sure, they can speak it, but maybe they will steadfastly refuse to purely because it was forced on them?

    You might have a point if it was said with the intention of making a case for compulsory Irish, It was not so this is just a strawman.:rolleyes:

    Maybe they will all jump off a cliff, but there is no evidience for either so I fail to see why you are bringing it up. People from Gaelscoileanna are far more likely to use Irish, though being able to use Irish shows why.

    No you don't. You say Gaelscoils promote habitual Irish usage. You have no evidence of this. I do *not* need to provide any evidence to the contrary to say you have absolutely nothing to back up your claim.

    You dont need to provide evidience, but you cant just assume the oppisit is true just because I have not backed up my claims. That people from Gaelscoils do indeed continue to use Irish is widely acknolaged, as the statment in the quote provided before alludes to. You can bury your head on this point and claim that no evidience for it means its not true, but you would just look a fool.
    For example, 8% say they are fluent in Irish, and 8.4% say they want Irish to be the main spoken language of the country. 33.7% say they have a “middling” or “not so fluent” amount of Irish, and 33% say they want Irish to be revived, but with English remaining as the main language of the country.
    The remaining 58% say they have little or no Irish, with 52% wanting Irish preserved in the Gaeltacht and for cultural reasons and 6% wanting to abandon the language completely.
    This shows that for the most part people are putting their money where their mouth is in regards to speaking Irish.

    But nobody actually wants to speak it. Again, we're back to Irish as a pipe dream.

    Thats simply not true, This has to be the most idotic statment I have ever come across. How do you know this? Where is your evidience to back up this ridiculus claim?
    Yes I am against this. My case is that it is a waste of money. The support for my ideas is in the surveys that show many people are not interested in Irish. I know how democracy works.

    Please show me a single survey that shows people are not intrested in Irish. I can show many surveys that show clear and widespread support for the language.


    The debate on that remains whether compulsory Irish helps promote subsequent usage of Irish. This however is not really anything that interests me. I have no desire to promote or diminish Irish usage, if anything I'd prefer it to be more prevalent, but not at the expense of it being compulsory or a pointless drain on state resources.


    Well, It dose, I would cite the major decline in England in Language learning as evidience for this. Feel free to show some counter evidience to this.

    But we are back to the 100 guys paid to speak Klingon. Or Quenya. Or l33t. Your definition has that as making it a "living" language. If it's that easy to "make" a "living" langauge then the life or death of a language is an exercise in cheque writing.


    No, Its not, You cant pay someone to be a native speaker, Do you even know what the term Native speaker means?
    I would like to see the continued use of the Irish language.
    I do not believe this is the state's responsibility.
    What makes a cultural imposition OK just because it is historically our culture?


    The state disagrees with you there.
    How can Irish be a Cultural imposition if it is our culture?


  • #218
    deise go deo
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,677 ✭✭✭deise go deo


    Dan_Solo wrote: »
    Fine, you agree you have no case for justifying compulsory Irish.
    We get it already.


    No, I dont, Please stop trying to misrepresent what I am saying, It is very childish.
    I am saying that the argument I made was to disprove you claim that there were no jobs that required Irish that were not directly paied by the state. That argument had nothing to do with making an argument for or against compulsory Irish in schools, your repeated atempt to move the goalpoasts is again childish, I proved that what you claimed was wrong, Live with it.


  • #219
    Dan_Solo
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭✭Dan_Solo


    deise go deo wrote: »
    No, I dont, Please stop trying to misrepresent what I am saying, It is very childish.
    I am saying that the argument I made was to disprove you claim that there were no jobs that required Irish that were not directly paied by the state. That argument had nothing to do with making an argument for or against compulsory Irish in schools, your repeated atempt to move the goalpoasts is again childish, I proved that what you claimed was wrong, Live with it.
    And it's very childish to pretend you can make any case for Irish being a useful skill to have. You tried (and failed admittedly) earlier. Why so quiet about it now?


  • #220
    Dan_Solo
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭✭Dan_Solo


    deise go deo wrote: »
    The poll was carried out by Ipsos MRBI, Are you claiming that they were biased in their polling?
    There wasent one the year before, The one before was carried out at the request of FG in 2005.
    No, I'm claiming the methodology of their questions is suggestive.
    deise go deo wrote: »
    I dont know where you are getting your info from with regards English maths Science etc, Please provide a ling as I dont think that was part of either survey. I hope you are not making stuff up.
    Don't tell me you haven't actually read the report?
    http://cnmg.ie/pdfs/10-028750%20%20Comhar%20OmniPoll%20Report%20(2).pdf
    I hope you are not simply pretending that what I said about Irish being a quite low priority for most people isn't true?
    deise go deo wrote: »
    That was from the last poll in 2005, Someones not trying very hard to keep up. Do you even know what you are talking about here?
    And someone's desperate to cling to a single source that they haven't even read. Go figure.
    deise go deo wrote: »
    You might have a point if it was said with the intention of making a case for compulsory Irish, It was not so this is just a strawman.:rolleyes:
    Maybe they will all jump off a cliff, but there is no evidience for either so I fail to see why you are bringing it up. People from Gaelscoileanna are far more likely to use Irish, though being able to use Irish shows why.
    So now you've said it twice, with no evidence to back it up either time, it is true?
    Sorry, it isn't. Even if you say it three times.
    deise go deo wrote: »
    You dont need to provide evidience, but you cant just assume the oppisit is true just because I have not backed up my claims. That people from Gaelscoils do indeed continue to use Irish is widely acknolaged, as the statment in the quote provided before alludes to. You can bury your head on this point and claim that no evidience for it means its not true, but you would just look a fool.
    You are, again, misquoting me. Nasty habit you have there.
    "claim that no evidience for it means its not true". I did not say this.
    I said that it is NOT PROVEN. This is not the same as it not being true. I do not believe it is obvious in any way, and you have no data AT ALL to back it up. By definition, it is therefore conjecture.
    deise go deo wrote: »
    Thats simply not true, This has to be the most idotic statment I have ever come across. How do you know this? Where is your evidience to back up this ridiculus claim?
    The vast majority of people who can speak Irish do not speak Irish. How much more evidence that they don't want to speak Irish do you need?
    deise go deo wrote: »
    Please show me a single survey that shows people are not intrested in Irish. I can show many surveys that show clear and widespread support for the language.
    They certainly don't want to speak it. Their "interest" is all a little pointless otherwise.
    deise go deo wrote: »
    Well, It dose, I would cite the major decline in England in Language learning as evidience for this. Feel free to show some counter evidience to this.
    Cite what? You haven't cited anything. What are you citing? Do you even know what "cite" means?
    deise go deo wrote: »
    No, Its not, You cant pay someone to be a native speaker, Do you even know what the term Native speaker means?
    Your new claim is that non-native speakers needn't bother learning the language as they will never be part of the "living" Irish. You might want to put that on the promotional posters for Irish language course?
    deise go deo wrote: »
    The state disagrees with you there.
    Correct. They also disagree with me on giving 100 billion of taxpayer money to German bankers, but that's democracy in action, isn't it?
    deise go deo wrote: »
    How can Irish be a Cultural imposition if it is our culture?
    Well if it's "our culture" why does it need to be compulsorally force taught in schools?


  • #221
    An gal gréine
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 941 ✭✭✭An gal gréine


    [QUOTE=Dan_Solo

    But nobody actually wants to speak it.

    [/QUOTE] 212

    This is obviously your heartfelt opinion but the data I provided (which were ignored) showed this not to be factual. The reason you may not hear much Irish spoken is because those speaking it are scattered, there's no ghettos in the cities. So when the annual 'Oireachtas na Gaeilge' comes 'round every year, those wanting to speak it and hear it spoken flock there; this year Killarney host it. The English-language media largely ignore it.
    During the year, the main cities do have centres where it is spoken daily. Áras na nGael in Dominick St. Galway, you may have heard of. In Belfast, there are several, Cumann Chluain Ard and the Cultúrlann to name 2. Cork's is in the Dyke's area and Club Chonradh na Gaeilge in Dublin's Harcourt St. is on the go since 1968.
    I also mentioned the 175,000 who watched the repeat and without subtitles TG4 party leaders' debate last Wednesday. If people were'nt interested in the language, as you repeatedly state here as if it were fact, then they would'nt be watching at all. This seems to be lost on you.
    The language is growing. More and more Gaelscoileanna pop up every year despite obstacles put in their way by the State. As these students join the workforce, where the language of Commerce is English largely, they are and will be looking for more outlets for their Irish language usage.
    Recently a new Dublin-based all-Irish speaking G.A.A. club was formed.
    People not interested? I dont think so!


  • Advertisement
  • #222
    Krusader
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,057 ✭✭✭Krusader


    An gal gréine wrote: »
    212
    Recently a new Dublin-based all-Irish speaking G.A.A. club was formed.
    People not interested? I dont think so!

    An bhfuil aon chlub sacair Gaeilge i mBÁC, níl mórán suime agam sa pheil


  • #223
    An gal gréine
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 941 ✭✭✭An gal gréine


    Níl go fóill, a Chrosaidí, ach mar a dúras, ta forbairt i ndán dúinn.
    Tá easpa éigin ar mo dhuine, ní chasfá le duine chomh sotalach i do shaol.


  • #224
    r0cks0l1dd
    Registered Users Posts: 87 ✭✭r0cks0l1dd


    Some activists are just opposing this for the sake of the Irish language. They don't really care if people have difficulties with it or any other arguments. It doesn't effect anyone except students in the slightest. The Irish heritage won't be lost because it will still be there, only optional (besides some parents will force their kids to do it anyway). I think that it's compulsory status doesn't help preserve it at all, it just makes more people hate doing the language. I'm in Sixth Year and a lot of my friends said they would prefer it if it wasn't compulsory. I don't mind it being there but I think it would be more beneficial to everyone if it was not compulsory.


  • #225
    Krusader
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,057 ✭✭✭Krusader


    r0cks0l1dd wrote: »
    I'm in Sixth Year and a lot of my friends said they would prefer it if it wasn't compulsory.

    That's because it's a difficult subject as languages tend to be, probably the most difficult one on the syllabus, if it was easy like Art, students would love it. The curriculum is ridiculous and rotten but making it optional without reform doesn't solve anything


  • #226
    Insect Overlord
    Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 30,915 Mod ✭✭✭✭Insect Overlord


    r0cks0l1dd wrote: »
    Activists are just opposing this for the sake of the Irish language.

    Eh... That's kind of the point? :confused:
    r0cks0l1dd wrote: »
    They don't really care if people have difficulties with it or any other arguments.

    Have you taken the time to read the thread? Every argument put forward has been treated to suitable scrutiny. There are good arguments on both sides, both for and against. Telling us we don't care is, no offence, a childish way of approaching the debate.
    r0cks0l1dd wrote: »
    It doesn't effect anyone except students in the slightest.

    It affects far more than just students. It affects teachers and lecturers at second and third level. It affects parents. It affects book shops and publishers. It affects policy-makers, administrative staff and researchers. There's a whole world out there beyond your secondary school classroom.


  • #227
    r0cks0l1dd
    Registered Users Posts: 87 ✭✭r0cks0l1dd


    Insect Overlord wrote: »
    Eh... That's kind of the point? :confused:



    Have you taken the time to read the thread? Every argument put forward has been treated to suitable scrutiny. There are good arguments on both sides, both for and against. Telling us we don't care is, no offence, a childish way of approaching the debate.



    It affects far more than just students. It affects teachers and lecturers at second and third level. It affects parents. It affects book shops and publishers. It affects policy-makers, administrative staff and researchers. There's a whole world out there beyond your secondary school classroom.

    Well I respect what you think but it is my opinion after all. I just think people could have an easier time having the choice not to do it, while chosing something else instead.

    Make no mistake, I'm not trying to argue with you or anyone else on this thread. I just wanted to make my view clear even though it's not a suitable one for some.


  • #228
    Insect Overlord
    Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 30,915 Mod ✭✭✭✭Insect Overlord


    r0cks0l1dd wrote: »
    Well I respect what you think but it is my opinion after all. I just think people could have an easier time having the choice not to do it, while chosing something else instead.

    Make no mistake, I'm not trying to argue with you or anyone else on this thread. I just wanted to make my view clear even though it's not a suitable one for some.

    You're perfectly entitled to your opinion. As I mentioned earlier in the thread, I can understand where people are coming from when it comes to Irish from Leaving Cert students' perspective.

    My problem was the way you rubbished every other argument without even referencing an example to prove your point. I see you've gone back an edited your post to make it more general ;)

    Feel free to argue with me. :) I enjoy a good debate.


  • #229
    SeanMadd
    Closed Accounts Posts: 268 ✭✭SeanMadd


    Wow didn't think this would become so big when I created it! But anyway, looks like Enda Kenny will more than likely be the next Taoiseach. http://www.rte.ie/news/2011/0226/politics.html

    Do you think he'll go ahead and make irish optional or pay attention to the online petition(and this thread, if he has happened to see it, ha!)and keep irish compulsory?

    I really wish he would take the other route to improving our language by changing whole god damn system of learning, starting in primary school(is this my third time saying this?), because clearly not many like to make a big effort in Secondary.


  • #230
    subedei
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 208 ✭✭subedei


    r0cks0l1dd wrote: »
    Some activists are just opposing this for the sake of the Irish language. They don't really care if people have difficulties with it or any other arguments. It doesn't effect anyone except students in the slightest. The Irish heritage won't be lost because it will still be there, only optional (besides some parents will force their kids to do it anyway).

    Yep as it worked with Fine Gael making Irish optional in the civil service too:
    In 1973-75, a part of the national movement, Fine Gael, told us that it would vastly improve the prospects for the survival of Irish if its status was lowered in the state apparatus. We opposed their idea. In the absence of the strongest possible balancing status-supports and interventions, we pointed out that in any society the subordinated language would, in a short time, be driven out and replaced by the dominant language. As they are telling us today, Fine Gael told us then that our critique was ‘nonsense’. They went ahead and withdrew the status-supports for Irish in the state apparatus. What was the result?

    The Department of Education once operated almost entirely through Irish. Recent research has shown that as a result of Fine Gael’s removal of the status of Irish in 1973 and its replacement by some voluntary incentives, the proportion of staff who can provide a service through Irish is down now to 1.5pc! That is hardly an advertisement for lowering the status of Irish in the education system.

    http://www.gaelport.com/sonrai-nuachta?NewsItemID=5671


  • #231
    Trevor451
    Closed Accounts Posts: 1,463 ✭✭✭Trevor451


    I am all for abolishing Irish in schools :) Its useless after you finish secondary school if you want to get a proper job :rolleyes:


  • Advertisement
  • #232
    subedei
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 208 ✭✭subedei


    Trevor451 wrote: »
    I am all for abolishing Irish in schools :) Its useless after you finish secondary school if you want to get a proper job :rolleyes:

    Well its a sad state of affairs when this is the opinion of an Irish person. when we get opinions like the link below from a greek man:

    http://www.gaelport.com/sonrai-nuachta?NewsItemID=5660


  • #233
    DIF
    Registered Users Posts: 151 ✭✭DIF


    Surely it would be better to teach our kids one of the Chinese languages like Mandarin?

    instead have Irish as a optional subject for all those romantic / sentimental upwardly mobile urbanites who like to think they're being very politically correct by sending their cotton-wool protected urban-chic middle-class little darling to an Irish School? The same people probably drive a Lexus Hybrid and shop in Farmers Markets because they believe they are superior to everybody else by wanting to save the planet by buying organic berries and coffee beans from South American.

    Now thats my rant over.... have a nice day folks. :D


  • #234
    Insect Overlord
    Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 30,915 Mod ✭✭✭✭Insect Overlord


    There's a great quote in "An Béal Bocht" that I'd love to post here. Ironically, for a piece that satirises the attitude of the pro-Gaeilge brigade, it actually describes the modern opposition in quite fitting terms. I'll copy it down tonight. Sadly, they won't even understand it without a translation!


  • #235
    Adrian009
    Closed Accounts Posts: 419 ✭✭Adrian009


    Insect Overlord wrote: »
    There's a great quote in "An Béal Bocht" that I'd love to post here. Ironically, for a piece that satirises the attitude of the pro-Gaeilge brigade, it actually describes the modern opposition in quite fitting terms. I'll copy it down tonight. Sadly, they won't even understand it without a translation!

    That pretty much proves Enda's point.
    People love the language, but not in sufficent numbers to learn it.
    If it cannot stand on its own merits, it should be let go.


  • #236
    Toyota_Avensis
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 215 ✭✭Toyota_Avensis


    Optional Irish at Leaving Cert is by no means a bad idea IMO. Having it there doesn't encourage those to use it as a living language anyway, simply because they're not proficient in the language. Making it optional is worthy of consideration and implementation, providing the Primary School Curriculum regarding Irish is vastly improved. Anybody ever wonder what the effects would be of having all primary education as irish medium in all national schools across the country? Would it have worked?


  • #237
    Adrian009
    Closed Accounts Posts: 419 ✭✭Adrian009


    QUESTION: How many pro-Irish posters here are Gaeilgeoirs?


  • #238
    Adrian009
    Closed Accounts Posts: 419 ✭✭Adrian009


    Toyota_Avensis wrote: »
    Anybody ever wonder what the effects would be of having all primary education as irish medium in all national schools across the country? Would it have worked?

    That's what the Gaelscoillna are for, so if people wish to send their children to them, they can.


  • #239
    DIF
    Registered Users Posts: 151 ✭✭DIF


    Google Translator can translate for us non-Irish speakers - well give is the jist of what it says anyways ;)


  • #240
    Toyota_Avensis
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 215 ✭✭Toyota_Avensis


    Adrian009 wrote: »
    That's what the Gaelscoillna are for, so if people wish to send their children to them, they can.

    I understand the gaelscoileanna is there for that reason, and a great service they do provide for the language, without a doubt. But I was wondering had all national schools in the state been ran like Irish Medium gaelscoileanna, how effective would it have been for raising the popularity/use of spoken Irish on a daily basis throughout the country.


  • Advertisement
  • #241
    Toyota_Avensis
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 215 ✭✭Toyota_Avensis


    Gaeilgeoir anseo by the way, but by no means against Enda's plans of Optionalization of Irish at Leaving Cert level.


  • #242
    goat2
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,939 ✭✭✭goat2


    deise go deo wrote: »
    How so? FG are not even in government yet. Plans for protest's are already being made.

    people knew when they were going to cast their votes, that fg had expressed that they would make irish an optional language, seems that they dont mind this fact, when they gave votes in their thousands in every area including gaeltacht areas to fg candidates, i am very much for keeping our language an important subject,


  • #243
    subedei
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 208 ✭✭subedei


    Adrian009 wrote: »
    QUESTION: How many pro-Irish posters here are Gaeilgeoirs?

    I am not a Gaeilgeoir by any stretch of the imagination.


  • #244
    siobhan.murphy
    Registered Users Posts: 1,340 ✭✭✭siobhan.murphy


    No personal attacks, please.

    Go raibh maith agat,

    simu


  • #245
    deise go deo
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,677 ✭✭✭deise go deo


    goat2 wrote: »
    people knew when they were going to cast their votes, that fg had expressed that they would make irish an optional language, seems that they dont mind this fact, when they gave votes in their thousands in every area including gaeltacht areas to fg candidates, i am very much for keeping our language an important subject,


    The election was on far more Issues than just Irish in school, even so, several FG candidates criticized Endas policy as it was loosing them votes, FG seams very confused as to what they intend to do, They have mentioned making it optional several times, yet their manifesto only mentions making Irish optional by saying it won't happen before a consultation, it dosent actually say that they will make it optional during the next term at all.

    Michael Creed TD

    One of their TD's even went as far as to say that Irish would not be made optional for 'a generation or two' saying that the curriculum would be reformed first and making it optional would only come after 'verifiable results' had been seen.


  • #246
    Enkidu
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,005 ✭✭✭Enkidu


    donjfarrell wrote: »
    Surely it would be better to teach our kids one of the Chinese languages like Mandarin?
    Trust me, if we cannot get the teaching of Irish, French, German or Spanish right we would be out of our heads to try Mandarin. The United States military rates it as a category IV language, which means in the amount of time it would take you to obtain proficient French, you will obtain basic Chinese.
    instead have Irish as a optional subject for all those romantic / sentimental upwardly mobile urbanites who like to think they're being very politically correct by sending their cotton-wool protected urban-chic middle-class little darling to an Irish School? The same people probably drive a Lexus Hybrid and shop in Farmers Markets because they believe they are superior to everybody else by wanting to save the planet by buying organic berries and coffee beans from South American.
    I'd say they're gay as well and probably fancy their own Dads.


  • Advertisement
  • #247
    Dan_Solo
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭✭Dan_Solo


    Enkidu wrote: »
    Trust me, if we cannot get the teaching of Irish, French, German or Spanish right we would be out of our heads to try Mandarin. The United States military rates it as a category IV language, which means in the amount of time it would take you to obtain proficient French, you will obtain basic Chinese.
    Better to have a working knowledge of something useful than be a world authority on something useless.


  • #248
    Enkidu
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,005 ✭✭✭Enkidu


    Dan_Solo wrote: »
    Better to have a working knowledge of something useful than be a world authority on something useless.
    That is correct, however it ignores the point. It is easy to sound like a realist and say something practical like "let's teach Mandarin" without any estimation of how difficult it would be. If we can't teach French and German well it would be a stretch to try our hands at Mandarin.

    For example it would be difficult to ensure that you would actually have a working knowledge of Mandarin by the end of secondary school. To even have a good chance at it, we would need more native speakers teaching in schools.

    Anyway I realise I'm going on a tangent, but blurting out "Let's teach Mandarin" is an empty statement.


  • #249
    Dan_Solo
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭✭Dan_Solo


    Enkidu wrote: »
    Anyway I realise I'm going on a tangent, but blurting out "Let's teach Mandarin" is an empty statement.
    I wasn't necessarily talking about a language at all as an alternative. If people don't want to do a second language, so what? We all speak the "Lingua Franca" of the Western world and for the foreseeable that's enough.
    Give the kids double maths or science to make up!


  • #250
    deise go deo
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,677 ✭✭✭deise go deo


    Dan_Solo wrote: »
    I wasn't necessarily talking about a language at all as an alternative. If people don't want to do a second language, so what? We all speak the "Lingua Franca" of the Western world and for the foreseeable that's enough.
    Give the kids double maths or science to make up!

    Do you not realize just how valuable teaching language is in an Educational sense?

    I am not talking about Irish specifically, but a second language in general.

    English is not the only language in the world, nor is it the only language in the western world, far from it.

    Bilingualism is the future, The Aim of the European Union is Mother tongue +2.


  • #251
    Dan_Solo
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭✭Dan_Solo


    deise go deo wrote: »
    Do you not realize just how valuable teaching language is in an Educational sense?
    No better or worse than any other subject.
    Why not make computer science compulsory instead? Everyone on each needs it and it gives you smarts as good as Latin/Sanskrit/Irish/Linear B whatever.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement