Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Marvel Cinematic Universe general stuff

1293032343589

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,501 ✭✭✭✭Slydice


    2:58

    What did he call him?
    Barry Key-Yoo-Gee-In? :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,000 ✭✭✭Stone Deaf 4evr


    FunLover18 wrote: »
    I wonder is there anything to stop Marvel getting Tom Holland back to play a character called Peter, even just in one scene to explain Spider-Man's absence.

    part of me thought that, considering how Far from home ended, is that he could be given a new identity, but still, if he's not doing spider-things, is there any point to having him at all?


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ Esme Bitter Stone


    part of me thought that, considering how Far from home ended, is that he could be given a new identity, but still, if he's not doing spider-things, is there any point to having him at all?

    Deter harker - the night monkey


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,909 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    wandavison-poster-907x680.jpg


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I wonder are they taking cues from the limited 'Vision' series of recent years, where Vision tries to live (and literally create) the perfect 'nuclear' American life - with disastrous consequences. Would make for an interesting story to adapt.

    This is going to be a prequel, right, and prior to the events of Infinity War?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,501 ✭✭✭✭Slydice


    I don't think so. I'd guess this is more after endgame.. when it dawns that Vision isn't coming back.

    Subtitle: You're reality re-write is in progress.. please hold while one of our most powerful team-members processes your request


    I'm guessing she'll create a little Universe for herself and her recreation of Vision or maybe set aside some of the current MCU. That some parts of the other reality will start interfering.. and who knows what's gonna happen.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Hmmm that begs an interesting question: if your theory holds, I wonder would Disney-Marvel be ballsy enough to make a change to the universe from one of its TV shows?

    You always got the sense that the Netflix shows & Agents of SHIELD were held back by their inability to actually interact with the broader MCU world. Now that these Disney+ shows will be set within the MCU universe itself, will they be allowed to cause events that cascade back INTO the film 'universe'?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,501 ✭✭✭✭Slydice


    I'm currently wondering if these 6 episode tv shows aren't just 2-parter movies in disguise!

    but to change the Cinema-going universe from a limited access streaming service doesn't seem like the sensible approach the MCU has taken to date.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,501 ✭✭✭✭Slydice




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,450 ✭✭✭kerplun k


    pixelburp wrote: »
    Hmmm that begs an interesting question: if your theory holds, I wonder would Disney-Marvel be ballsy enough to make a change to the universe from one of its TV shows?

    You always got the sense that the Netflix shows & Agents of SHIELD were held back by their inability to actually interact with the broader MCU world. Now that these Disney+ shows will be set within the MCU universe itself, will they be allowed to cause events that cascade back INTO the film 'universe'?

    Oh I think they definitely will.
    I’m almost certain of it.
    Sure hasn’t it been mentioned that the events of WandaVision will set up the doctor strange sequel?

    Disney+ will be proper connected in the way that none of the jeph loeb produced shows were.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    Slydice wrote: »
    I'm currently wondering if these 6 episode tv shows aren't just 2-parter movies in disguise!

    but to change the Cinema-going universe from a limited access streaming service doesn't seem like the sensible approach the MCU has taken to date.

    It shouldn't be very limited access by the time these shows roll out, for most only by whether you'll pay for the service.

    What happens in the shows will definitely change characters that appear in the movies and move along their overall story and the wider MCU. If you don't pay or steal it you'll have to take accept line or two filler they provide for where the characters now are.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,450 ✭✭✭kerplun k


    Slydice wrote: »
    I'm currently wondering if these 6 episode tv shows aren't just 2-parter movies in disguise!

    but to change the Cinema-going universe from a limited access streaming service doesn't seem like the sensible approach the MCU has taken to date.

    If anything, I’d say they’re big juicy hooks to get you to click on that +sub button.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    It'll be very hard to use full MCU characters and NOT impact the film universe. Given that Disney+ is far from a global service, especially for that first year after launch, it'll be an interesting gamble. Maybe Disney are hoping for a surge in torrenting, and won't be as aggressively against it as I'd have otherwise suspected.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,450 ✭✭✭kerplun k


    Yep, Another thing that I’m certain of is that between these and Star Wars, they’re gonna be the most pirated shows in history:D


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    pixelburp wrote: »
    It'll be very hard to use full MCU characters and NOT impact the film universe. Given that Disney+ is far from a global service, especially for that first year after launch, it'll be an interesting gamble. Maybe Disney are hoping for a surge in torrenting, and won't be as aggressively against it as I'd have otherwise suspected.

    First MCU Disney+ show isn't due until towards the end of 2020 and by that time Disney+ will be available in most places.

    With the recent dumps of info it may appear like we'll be underwater in the next few months with the amount of releases but they're really spread over a pretty decent period of time.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 2,450 ✭✭✭kerplun k


    Foxtrol wrote: »
    First MCU Disney+ show isn't due until towards the end of 2020 and by that time Disney+ will be available in most places.

    With the recent dumps of info it may appear like we'll be underwater in the next few months with the amount of releases but they're really spread over a pretty decent period of time.

    Ha.
    2021 will consist 3 feature length movies, 18 hours of big budget essential “TV” MCU viewing on + (Loki, WV & Cap/WS). Then throw in 23 episodes of What If...

    That’s not including any Hulu, Freeform, or ABC shows that could potentially air.

    I’d call that pretty congested.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Worth pointing out mind, that at least one MCU project got shelved that we know of (the proposed Inhumans movie, downgraded to that awful TV mini series), while Disney have already canceled a Disney+ series; "Book of Enchantment" was deemed too dark by execs on reviewing the scripts produced & got canned instead of a rewrite.

    Disney+, despite the deep coffers and solid brands, is not guaranteed a success and without knowing the desired subscriber target, I'd say every show announcement should be considered tentative. Online streaming is a viral beast and when you look at Netflix the margins are razor thin; it's arguably more cutthroat than traditional network TV.

    Between the MCU and Star Wars, they're two franchises that have never lived on mainstream TV (of course there have been a metric tonne of cartoons, but fair to say that's been kids TV, while the Netflix subfranchise yiwlded mixed results)


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    kerplun k wrote: »
    Ha.
    2021 will consist 3 feature length movies, 18 hours of big budget essential “TV” MCU viewing on + (Loki, WV & Cap/WS). Then throw in 23 episodes of What If...

    That’s not including any Hulu, Freeform, or ABC shows that could potentially air.

    I’d call that pretty congested.

    I specifically said it won't be an issue in the next few months, so I'm not sure why you're pointing to 2021. In both 2019 and 2020 we're having 1 less MCU movie than we've become used to over the last several years and only 1 new show in total, that is 6 episodes long.

    Even at the peak you're pointing to, it is the same number of movies as we are used to plus TV that is about equivalent to the screentime of the early AoS seasons, just now across a few Disney+ shows (presuming What if episodes are shorter). At this point, I've no interest in Hulu/Freeform/ABC output but if you must watch everything Marvel related we're losing all the Netflix shows (6 of them) and AoS, which again evens things out.

    On a bulk announement basis it seems like a whole lot but, based on what has been announced, it is actually less content in the short term and about the same in the medium term.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,310 ✭✭✭✭CastorTroy


    For that poster, I wonder if they gave her the comic costume just as a reference to the comics, or if they're actually going to use it


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Probably a nod to the comics; it'd take some doing to make the 'traditional' comics costume work in live-action, it's one of the dafter arrangements (maybe if there's some 'reality warping' segments they might have her wearing the traditional costume in a nod)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 288 ✭✭LazySamaritan


    CastorTroy wrote: »
    For that poster, I wonder if they gave her the comic costume just as a reference to the comics, or if they're actually going to use it

    What poster?


  • Registered Users Posts: 288 ✭✭LazySamaritan


    pixelburp wrote: »
    Worth pointing out mind, that at least one MCU project got shelved that we know of (the proposed Inhumans movie, downgraded to that awful TV mini series), while Disney have already canceled a Disney+ series; "Book of Enchantment" was deemed too dark by execs on reviewing the scripts produced & got canned instead of a rewrite.

    Disney+, despite the deep coffers and solid brands, is not guaranteed a success and without knowing the desired subscriber target, I'd say every show announcement should be considered tentative. Online streaming is a viral beast and when you look at Netflix the margins are razor thin; it's arguably more cutthroat than traditional network TV.

    Between the MCU and Star Wars, they're two franchises that have never lived on mainstream TV (of course there have been a metric tonne of cartoons, but fair to say that's been kids TV, while the Netflix subfranchise yiwlded mixed results)

    Shelving the show seems a bit extreme.

    Why wouldn’t they order rewrites?

    And how dark could it possibly have got? Bad things happen in the MCU and Star Wars so I would have thought the writers would know how far is too sat for Disney


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,310 ✭✭✭✭CastorTroy


    What poster?
    wandavison-poster-907x680.jpg

    The shadow seems to have the headpiece from her comic costume


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    Shelving the show seems a bit extreme.

    Why wouldn’t they order rewrites?

    And how dark could it possibly have got? Bad things happen in the MCU and Star Wars so I would have thought the writers would know how far is too sat for Disney

    This is the price paid for working with Disney properties, and reveals that their executives are quite close to productions on this new network - or at least those productions that touch IPs considered most 'fragile'. SW & the MCU are probably allowed a little latitude as their very being is about conflict and drama; but I'd say a show that dicked around too much with classic villains probably got executives nervy.

    This is how Disney roll though, and what is to be expected: Disney+ looks deeply "family friendly" and obviously has more executive oversight than other services; shows such as The Mandalorian appear to be allowed a certain degree of wriggle room to darken its tone, but that's probably because it's well established that making SW kid-friendly is usually a disaster.


  • Registered Users Posts: 894 ✭✭✭El Duda


    Perhaps Disney/Marvel could finally make that series that painstakingly explains the ins and outs of 'the snap' in great detail? I know there's an appetite for it from 2 posters on here.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,310 ✭✭✭✭CastorTroy


    Don't have a Disney + thread yet, but will post here that I just read they'll be airing their series weekly rather than going the Netflix route of dropping all episodes at once


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    CastorTroy wrote: »
    Don't have a Disney + thread yet, but will post here that I just read they'll be airing their series weekly rather than going the Netflix route of dropping all episodes at once

    Aside from Netflix, streaming companies are moving away from the model of dumping all episodes at once. Hulu, Amazon, CBS all do most of their big releases on a weekly basis. Better for them in both extending the length of time people are signed up but also to build hype.


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,257 ✭✭✭The White Wolf


    Foxtrol wrote: »
    Aside from Netflix, streaming companies are moving away from the model of dumping all episodes at once. Hulu, Amazon, CBS all do most of their big releases on a weekly basis. Better for them in both extending the length of time people are signed up but also to build hype.

    If that's the case then the quality of the story, talent at the disposal, budget, and most of all depth of the content would want to be serious. Only reason I signed up for Netflix and Amazon was the quick release of content.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    If that's the case then the quality of the story, talent at the disposal, budget, and most of all depth of the content would want to be serious. Only reason I signed up for Netflix and Amazon was the quick release of content.

    If you want to binge then just wait until they're all released and watch them in one go, problem solved ;)

    You can't really compare the Netflix model for new show releases to any other streaming platform, it is why they're basically an outlier at this point.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,450 ✭✭✭kerplun k


    I’m torn on which is best, While I enjoy having a ton of episodes to binge, you can’t beat the old way of releasing a weekly episode, especially for for quality shows, like Lost, X-Files, breaking bad, GoT in its hayday. It gives you a chance to actually digest and talk about each episodes. With the binge format, the talk around a good show can be over too quickly.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 5,257 ✭✭✭The White Wolf


    kerplun k wrote: »
    I’m torn on which is best, While I enjoy having a ton of episodes to binge, you can’t beat the old way of releasing a weekly episode, especially for for quality shows, like Lost, X-Files, breaking bad, GoT in its hayday. It gives you a chance to actually digest and talk about each episodes. With the binge format, the talk around a good show can be over too quickly.

    I think if the quality is there then how it's released doesn't matter.

    The thing I like about the binge format is that it cuts off the balls of bad analysis from click sites. It also saves a lot of time in establishing something is an utter waste of time i.e Luke Cage season 2 and 13 reasons why season 3.

    That's the thing about streaming services; they give you the option for better or worse.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,310 ✭✭✭✭CastorTroy


    Hulu seems confused about how to do it. Weekly shows like Castle Rock while Veronica Mars was all at once. Then Runaways had season 1 weekly and 2 all at once.

    One thing about weekly shows it acts as a weekly reminder the show exists. When they drop all at once, that's the window for letting people know about it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,984 ✭✭✭Venom


    CastorTroy wrote: »
    Hulu seems confused about how to do it. Weekly shows like Castle Rock while Veronica Mars was all at once. Then Runaways had season 1 weekly and 2 all at once.

    One thing about weekly shows it acts as a weekly reminder the show exists. When they drop all at once, that's the window for letting people know about it


    It really depends on the show in question. The like of "The Boys" or "Stranger Things" would do just as well in a weekly format.

    A full season drop on the other hand, benefits much weaker shows such as the likes of "Wu Assassins" and "Swampthing", which would lose viewership overall if people had to wait for the next episode.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,909 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    Venom wrote: »
    It really depends on the show in question. The like of "The Boys" or "Stranger Things" would do just as well in a weekly format.

    A full season drop on the other hand, benefits much weaker shows such as the likes of "Wu Assassins" and "Swampthing", which would lose viewership overall if people had to wait for the next episode.



    Swamp Thing was a weekly drop.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,984 ✭✭✭Venom


    Swamp Thing was a weekly drop.


    It was and I know a lot of people, myself included who were very vocal about it after the first few episodes but stopped watching halfway through due to a massive drop in story quality. A weaker show like Swampthing might have done better as an instant drop binge show.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,909 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    Haille Steinfeld in talks to take up the mantle of Hawkeye in the TV series.

    I wonder will this lead to a Young Avengers series.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,310 ✭✭✭✭CastorTroy


    Well we'll have Kate Bishop and Cassie Lang in the universe. So would need to introduce a few more


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,156 ✭✭✭✭Foxtrol


    I doubt they go full Young Avengers if they're doing school age x-men. I'd say they'd more likely use them as an avenue for a cross-over between the x-men and the older avengers group.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,310 ✭✭✭✭CastorTroy


    Then they also have Runaways and even New Warriors somewhere


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,153 ✭✭✭TheIrishGrover


    You also have to remember that many so-called Netlix Exclusives are exclusives outside of their home country. So they are basicaly traditional TV shows that Netflix have bought: BBC's Bodyguard was a "Netflix Exclusive" in the US so that was put up the day after each episode aired in the UK. Same with Star Trek Discovery: CBS were showing it weekly on their own streaming platform and then Netflix had the international rights.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,153 ✭✭✭TheIrishGrover


    Haille Steinfeld in talks to take up the mantle of Hawkeye in the TV series.

    She is a very good actor. Thought she was poor in Ender's Game but that was because it was a poor film but thought she was great in the Coen Brother's remake of True Grit.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    She is a very good actor. Thought she was poor in Ender's Game but that was because it was a poor film but thought she was great in the Coen Brother's remake of True Grit.

    She was also very good in last year's Bumblebee


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,909 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    The Russo's saying they want to do the FF in the MCU.


  • Registered Users Posts: 6,793 ✭✭✭FunLover18


    The Russo's saying they want to do the FF in the MCU.

    I wonder if Peyton Reed might have a go, didn't he have an idea for an FF movie before the Chris Evans version. The key is getting good writers who can handle the family dynamic and give everyone their due.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,909 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson




  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,124 ✭✭✭EoinMcLovin


    Spider-Man is back in the MCU
    The divorce Sony Pictures Entertainment and The Walt Disney Studios jointly announced today that Marvel Studios and its President Kevin Feige will produce the third film in the SPIDER-MAN HOMECOMING series, starring Tom Holland. The film is scheduled for release on July 16, 2021. As part of the arrangement, Spider-Man will also appear in a future Marvel Studios film. Amy Pascal will also produce through Pascal Pictures, as she has on the first two Holland-led films.
    https://deadline.com/2019/09/spider-man-kevin-feige-back-sony-pictures-1202746503/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 38,929 ✭✭✭✭PTH2009


    Knew that was going to happen very happy with it

    It would been a nightmare for the writers if Spider man got fecked out of the mcu


  • Registered Users Posts: 5,257 ✭✭✭The White Wolf


    Suppose you have to take what you can get here. Great news for the MCU as Far From Home really put Peter front and centre as a leading character in the shared universe.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 36,711 CMod ✭✭✭✭pixelburp


    I love how 3 separate threads I'm subscribed to instantaneously blew up about the same subject :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 60,909 ✭✭✭✭Agent Coulson


    Amy is the Kingmaker.

    So with her at Universal maybe a solo Hulk film can now be made with a deal bringing in a 3rd studio.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement