Why did Gardai destroy possible burial site of Irelands longest missing child?

Dolbert · 05-07-2016 7:22am

the only thing that i can come up with ( and this is purely my own speculation) is that the suspect had "dirt" on the FF man and vowed to bring him down as well if he had to go down , either that or just the fact they may have been part of the same ring, that the FF man felt he could get away with getting one of his own type off & did so

This is pretty much the conclusion I came to. There's a bigger reason they've gone to such lengths to protect this man. As I said before, I strongly believe they're waiting for one or both of them to die before moving on this. They don't want this guy questioned because of who he might bring down with him.

Going Forward · 05-07-2016 8:46am

I can't believe that I've had sympathy over the years for the individual I believe the documentary labelled.

I'm sure there are many like me, allowed to think that way until being forced to look at the obvious and learning about the alleged political interference.

But something still doesn't fit right with me about the two ex gaurds interviewed.

Did they seek to publicise the interference before now?

Who did they contact?

Other politicians, RTE, press or GSOC?

If they did, great, why hasn't it been made public before now?

If not, it's a bit late now.

Did Gemma O Doherty dig them out or did they contact her?

Dolbert · 05-07-2016 9:34am

It does seem like their hands were tied, and that they tried numerous times to get it escalated to no avail. They seemed immensely frustrated and heartbroken by it all.

JinkyJackson · 05-07-2016 9:39am

oranbhoy67 wrote:

it is strange all right i remember reading at the time that he thought it was a cattle grave which he said would be fairly common and he had faith that the gards had checked it out , i must find the link though

Still though, Surly over the years it was known the Garda hadn't checked the spot.. To wait 30 years, then go mad when the site is dug up.

robbiezero · 05-07-2016 10:31am

I see they are calling on the commissioner to arrest the man they claim is responsible. What evidence is there against him that merits an arrest?

rightyabe · 05-07-2016 10:55am

Was this case ever officially reviewed over the years? Like a cold case? Re interviewing everyone involved?

brooke 2 · 05-07-2016 1:47pm

Going Forward wrote: »

I can't believe that I've had sympathy over the years for the individual I believe the documentary labelled.

I'm sure there are many like me, allowed to think that way until being forced to look at the obvious and learning about the alleged political interference.

But something still doesn't fit right with me about the two ex gaurds interviewed.

Did they seek to publicise the interference before now?

Who did they contact?

Other politicians, RTE, press or GSOC?

If they did, great, why hasn't it been made public before now?

If not, it's a bit late now.

Did Gemma O Doherty dig them out or did they contact her?

I wouldn't be too hard on the two Gardaí. One
of them, in particular, seemed very upset that Mary's killer has never been brought to justice.
They clearly had wanted to bring in the suspect for questioning but were forbidden from doing so by their superiors.

Edit: Out of interest, why would you have had sympathy for the suspect over the years?

brooke 2 · 05-07-2016 1:55pm

robbiezero wrote: »

I see they are calling on the commissioner to arrest the man they claim is responsible. What evidence is there against him that merits an arrest?

I doubt he will be arrested. Mary Boyle's mother is very resistant to an inquiry being held, even going to the extreme, apparently, of putting in her will that she does not want one, even after her death! And, it seems, the Justice Minister is listening to her, or rather, taking cover behind her!

LCD · 05-07-2016 1:56pm

Just stumbled across this today, had never heard of the case before. Putting 1 + 1 together it seems a lot of people know what happened & who did it. Unfortunately somebody in "high society" is blocking the whole thing.
I really feel for the family, to never know or see justice is a horrible thing.

kerry cow · 05-07-2016 1:58pm

You can not have individuals making up their own laws of the land. This country has laws that our government must enforce and nobody should be above that .Let justice be served .With out law we are lawless .Shame .
.A cover up is as bad as a murder must be interpreted as assistance and should be prosecuted like wise

JinkyJackson · 05-07-2016 1:58pm

brooke 2 wrote:

I doubt he will be arrested. Mary Boyle's mother is very resistant to an inquiry being held, even going to the extreme, apparently, of putting in her will that she does not want one, even after her death! And, it seems, the Justice Minister is listening to her, or rather, taking cover behind her!

Had the mother something to do with it or what? This isn't normal, especially to go as far as putting it in her will!

LCD · 05-07-2016 2:02pm

JinkyJackson wrote: »

Had the mother something to do with it or what? This isn't normal, especially to go as far as putting it in her will!

Could one of the mother's family be the culprit? Protecting the family name or the person themselves. Is very odd behavior for a mother

JinkyJackson · 05-07-2016 2:10pm

LCD wrote:

Could one of the mother's family be the culprit? Protecting the family name or the person themselves. Is very odd behavior for a mother

Exactly. If someone's daughter was murdered surly she would fight till her last breath an after that, to ensure the sick person who raped and killed her daughter was served justice.

Somethings way off here anyway.

jenny smith · 05-07-2016 2:30pm

brooke 2 wrote: »

I doubt he will be arrested. Mary Boyle's mother is very resistant to an inquiry being held, even going to the extreme, apparently, of putting in her will that she does not want one, even after her death! And, it seems, the Justice Minister is listening to her, or rather, taking cover behind her!

mary boyle's mother or her will is not the law.if that were so i could rob a bank and get mary boyle's mother to put in her will i am not prosecuted.

also the garda who said "as an experienced garda you know by a look in someone's eyes if they are guilty" is of no use in court. neither are any of the "i believe this or i believe that"

What the family want is irrelevant. you do not get a choice to decideif a crime in your family is prosecuted.

Going to pearse street was an amateur foolish thing to do. If Margo went to Dublin she should have gone to the head quarters of the garda

The only question is why is the law not being enforced? Who is not doing their job?Complain them to GSOC Is there enough evidence to arrest the suspect? if so why is he not arrested? I do not know about law or how much evidence is needed

I thought it a poor film. over long, badly directed. gemma standing outside a garda station

brooke 2 · 05-07-2016 2:31pm

JinkyJackson wrote: »

Had the mother something to do with it or what? This isn't normal, especially to go as far as putting it in her will!

A very close relation of the mother is the suspect. Must have been horrible for her
when she found out. Even more horrible to discover that her own flesh and blood may
have killed her child. Disgrace, humiliation and shame to the family name may explain
her desire to keep things quiet.

kerry cow · 05-07-2016 2:32pm

There are many unsolved cases out there where the answer to the crime is right there under your nose .

JinkyJackson · 05-07-2016 2:34pm

brooke 2 wrote:

A very close relation of the mother is the suspect. Must have been horrible for her when she found out. Even more horrible to discover that her own flesh and blood may have killed her child. Disgrace, humiliation and shame to the family name may explain her desire to keep things quiet.

Na sorry. If my own brother raped and murdered my little daughter, I wouldn't care about anything only him getting locked up for it.

Mary Boyles mother is a discusting person if she's knowingly letting a rapist and murderer roam free.

jenny smith · 05-07-2016 2:36pm

kerry cow wrote: »

There are many unsolved cases out there where the answer to the crime is right there under your nose .

There may be but usually the garda know but do not have evidence

jenny smith · 05-07-2016 2:41pm

Is it a fair comment that the cover up is wanted by certain sections of the family? So the politician is protecting them all not just the 'suspect'

The may think it is "better not wash their dirty linen in public" her mother said thing swere better dealt with quietly . What does quietly mean in this context. was the suspect in some way punished within the family?

And since the gardai said he was likely to re offend how come he did not?

brooke 2 · 05-07-2016 2:43pm

LCD wrote: »

Could one of the mother's family be the culprit? Protecting the family name or the person themselves. Is very odd behavior for a mother

Hard to understand how determined she is that there should never be an inquiry, even after her death.
Would she be financially dependent on this man? She is estranged from her daughter and seems quite
annoyed at all the attention Ann is getting in the media about Mary's disappearance. Said something
about how it would be better to do these things quietly and all that 'running to Westminster, Brussels,
etc. 'was nonsense'.

She seemed to get very worked up about that.

Seth Brundle · 05-07-2016 2:43pm

JinkyJackson wrote: »

Na sorry. If my own brother raped and murdered my little daughter, I wouldn't care about anything only him getting locked up for it.

God forbid but if it was my daughter, I'd be the one facing prison time after what I'd do to the brother!

JinkyJackson · 05-07-2016 2:47pm

kbannon wrote:

God forbid but if it was my daughter, I'd be the one facing prison time after what I'd do to the brother!

Exactly. I certainly wouldn't be putting it in my will that my brother never be found out.. I'm now of the opinion that the mother should be arrested and questioned as she is aiding in a serious crime

oranbhoy67 · 05-07-2016 2:48pm

I rang the mother a few weeks ago , I was very nervous doing this as I had always thought of her as "poor ann who lost Mary" etc until I had found out what was revealed last night ( and more tbh)

My nerves didnt last after she started ranting down the phone to me after I asked her about the accusations.

It was me she said to that she was going to put it in her will that there will not be an inquest , I asked her why she said "thats my business & no one elses" i answered that it was the business of everyone which she disputed, I then said that a child killer was free so it was in everyones interest , she started scolding me saying to me "how dare you say my child is dead" as you can see from the documentary she has admitted herself Mary is gone ,

She then tried another emotional argument with me " your uncle charlie didnt want an inquest neither we had discussed it before he passed so im respecting his wishes" i was disgusted that she was speaking for a man that isnt here to speak himself - but then when he was alive that was the way as well but we just didnt realize what was going on at the time .

She said she knows how inquests works as there was one held for my uncle Charlie and that "they dont have any power anyway" i replied that if this was the case then why was she worried , which was met with another torrent of screaming.

All in all who knows if the doc last night was correct no one can be 100% sure i know what i believe and I know that my cousin deserves an inquest at the very least and a real investigation into the crime and everyone who has covered it up held responsible

I still think they will wait until the 2 main players are dead to do anything.

mikeymouse · 05-07-2016 3:14pm

How often in cases like this is it the last person known to have seen the victim alive is the culprit?

oranbhoy67 · 05-07-2016 3:15pm

to add to this I and at least a hundred more people wrote letters to the Donegal Coroner asking him to hold an inquest into Marys death, we all got a copy and paste reply noting our interest & he told Young annes solicitors that he wasnt holding an inquest as he feared for how it would affect old annes health!

words just fail you at revelations like that !

oranbhoy67 · 05-07-2016 3:17pm

mikeymouse wrote: »

How often in cases like this is it the last person known to have seen the victim alive is the culprit?

https://www.dosomething.org/us/facts/11-facts-about-child-abuse

90% of child sexual abuse victims know the perpetrator in some way. 68% are abused by a family member.

mikeymouse · 05-07-2016 3:25pm

90% of child sexual abuse victims know the perpetrator in some way. 68% are abused by a family member.
If those figures are right then 90% of police effort should be on that person in this case ,bearing in mind the remoteness of the area.
What are the odds of a predator being in that area at that time?

Dolbert · 05-07-2016 3:39pm

The last person to see a victim alive, with no witnesses to corroborate the story, should at the very least be formally questioned. You would think so anyway.

oranbhoy67 · 05-07-2016 3:50pm

mikeymouse wrote: »

90% of child sexual abuse victims know the perpetrator in some way. 68% are abused by a family member.
If those figures are right then 90% of police effort should be on that person in this case ,bearing in mind the remoteness of the area.
What are the odds of a predator being in that area at that time?

I was at the scene a few months ago , the local taxi driver didnt even know how to get to it, you have to drive up a long twisting private (but there was no signs and gates were open) lane to get there

Its also on an exposed hillside and there was poachers on the lake that day who had a lookout on the hill who saw no strange vehicles. for me to walk from the front door of the house to the main road took about 15 minutes & I am 6"2 tall , i didnt even attempt to retrace Marys "final journey" as the land was so rough looking

Going Forward · 05-07-2016 4:23pm

brooke 2 wrote: »

I wouldn't be too hard on the two Gardaí. One
of them, in particular, seemed very upset that Mary's killer has never been brought to justice.
They clearly had wanted to bring in the suspect for questioning but were forbidden from doing so by their superiors.

Edit: Out of interest, why would you have had sympathy for the suspect over the years?

Because I was naive.

I believed the unbelievable account that was
given, that he had nothing to do with it.

I had thought of how guilty he must have felt letting her out of his sight, all the time thinking she was following him.

Looking around and not seeing her.

Then finding out she was missing.

Did many berate him for letting her out of his sight, I don't know, I don't remember anyone saying that here very much, certainly not like the McCanns were berated.

SafeSurfer · 05-07-2016 4:26pm

I am from the area and know some of the people involved. I find it difficult to believe that an, at the time, minor local politician could pick up the phone and dictate how one of the country's most how profile cases was conducted. Who could and could not be questioned etc. This wasn't the Taoiseach or minister for justice, it was a small time politician, below even county council level. When Sean Doherty was minister for justice in the Haughey government and intervened in a case of assault the intervention was soon exposed. It is incredible to believe that the politician in question would have that much clout and be able to keep it under wraps for so long.

OldMrBrennan83 · 05-07-2016 4:28pm

This post has been deleted.

SafeSurfer · 05-07-2016 4:37pm

Patww79 wrote: »

But it wasn't high profile. It was never let get that far.[/quote

It was hugely high profile at the time. Searches went on for months, with the army, civil defence etc. A neighbor of mine was hired for weeks to drain lakes and big holes with a tractor and tanker. It was a high profile case.

oranbhoy67 · 05-07-2016 5:32pm

SafeSurfer wrote: »

I am from the area and know some of the people involved. I find it difficult to believe that an, at the time, minor local politician could pick up the phone and dictate how one of the country's most how profile cases was conducted. Who could and could not be questioned etc. This wasn't the Taoiseach or minister for justice, it was a small time politician, below even county council level. When Sean Doherty was minister for justice in the Haughey government and intervened in a case of assault the intervention was soon exposed. It is incredible to believe that the politician in question would have that much clout and be able to keep it under wraps for so long.

he is a County Councillor now and hugely influential in other areas and a very wealthy man.

It is incredible to believe but incredible things happen at times , nothing about the Ireland of that era surprises me , did you watch the doc and if so what was your other general views on it ?

strandroad · 05-07-2016 5:49pm

SafeSurfer wrote: »

I am from the area and know some of the people involved. I find it difficult to believe that an, at the time, minor local politician could pick up the phone and dictate how one of the country's most how profile cases was conducted. Who could and could not be questioned etc. This wasn't the Taoiseach or minister for justice, it was a small time politician, below even county council level. When Sean Doherty was minister for justice in the Haughey government and intervened in a case of assault the intervention was soon exposed. It is incredible to believe that the politician in question would have that much clout and be able to keep it under wraps for so long.

You keep it quiet for a little while and it's this cover up that becomes the crime others will then try to cover up... not the actual killing.

SafeSurfer · 05-07-2016 6:05pm

oranbhoy67 wrote: »

he is a County Councillor now and hugely influential in other areas and a very wealthy man.

It is incredible to believe but incredible things happen at times , nothing about the Ireland of that era surprises me , did you watch the doc and if so what was your other general views on it ?

A councillor now, but not in 1977 and not nearly as wealthy or powerful as today. I thought the documentary fell short of my expectations. A lot of rumour, insinuation and hyperbole but short on any revelations or new evidence. Is there a shred of evidence for the intervention of the politician? No. I remain sceptical.
In order for the cover up to make any sense, the murderer would have to have the politician in a seriously compromised position who in turn would have had to have huge influence over the superintendent. Witnesses in the doc mention a call from the politician while in other newspaper articles they claim they heard about the call from colleagues.
What had the politician or the superintendent to gain from a cover up? There has never been any suggestion that either were involved in anything sinister to the best of my knowledge.

JinkyJackson · 05-07-2016 6:20pm

SafeSurfer wrote:

A councillor now, but not in 1977 and not nearly as wealthy or powerful as today. I thought the documentary fell short of my expectations. A lot of rumour, insinuation and hyperbole but short on any revelations or new evidence. Is there a shred of evidence for the intervention of the politician? No. I remain sceptical. In order for the cover up to make any sense, the murderer would have to have the politician in a seriously compromised position who in turn would have had to have huge influence over the superintendent. Witnesses in the doc mention a call from the politician while in other newspaper articles they claim they heard about the call from colleagues. What had the politician or the superintendent to gain from a cover up? There has never been any suggestion that either were involved in anything sinister to the best of my knowledge.

What had the two senior Gardai to gain from saying they were told to back off the main suspect? What has her sister to gain from making up stories, if that's what you believe? Why is Mary's mother so adamant that the suspect is never investigated?

I don't have any answers, but some sort of cover up is going on and I'd really like to know why.

oranbhoy67 · 05-07-2016 6:25pm

SafeSurfer wrote: »

A councillor now, but not in 1977 and not nearly as wealthy or powerful as today. I thought the documentary fell short of my expectations. A lot of rumour, insinuation and hyperbole but short on any revelations or new evidence. Is there a shred of evidence for the intervention of the politician? No. I remain sceptical.
In order for the cover up to make any sense, the murderer would have to have the politician in a seriously compromised position who in turn would have had to have huge influence over the superintendent. Witnesses in the doc mention a call from the politician while in other newspaper articles they claim they heard about the call from colleagues.
What had the politician or the superintendent to gain from a cover up? There has never been any suggestion that either were involved in anything sinister to the best of my knowledge.

what do you think of the mother refusing to allow an inquest , do you think its right she should even be allowed to do that?

as for this quote from you

What had the politician or the superintendent to gain from a cover up? There has never been any suggestion that either were involved in anything sinister to the best of my knowledge

I have on my computer here screenshots from a Donegal Democrat front page article from 1985 that says the politician and the superintendent were very close and that rank and file Gardai believed they were impeded in doing their job in trying to investigate any of his business deals because of this relationship not what I would call sinister but still allegations of Gardai/Political intervention on cases , I won't post it here because it contains the politicians name, im not scared of libel I have nothing to lose but I'm scared it will result in any potential mistrial of any suspects in the future .

also what do you think of the revelation that the superintendent attended a Fianna Fail function which is strictly against Gardai rules?

oranbhoy67 · 05-07-2016 6:30pm

id just like to point out these allegations that councillor and the superintendent Dom Murray were "very close" were made on the "today tonight" show shown on RTE on Wednesday November the 13th 1985 .

SafeSurfer · 05-07-2016 6:39pm

oranbhoy67 wrote: »

what do you think of the mother refusing to allow an inquest , do you think its right she should even be allowed to do that?

as for this quote from you

What had the politician or the superintendent to gain from a cover up? There has never been any suggestion that either were involved in anything sinister to the best of my knowledge

I have on my computer here screenshots from a Donegal Democrat front page article from 1985 that says the politician and the superintendent were very close and that rank and file Gardai believed they were impeded in doing their job in trying to investigate any of his business deals because of this relationship not what I would call sinister but still allegations of Gardai/Political intervention on cases , I won't post it here because it contains the politicians name, im not scared of libel I have nothing to lose but I'm scared it will result in any potential mistrial of any suspects in the future .

also what do you think of the revelation that the superintendent attended a Fianna Fail function which is strictly against Gardai rules?

It may break Garda rules but it is hardly evidence of Collusion in child murder. I know one of the guards who made allegations in the 80s. There was a Today Tonight programme on it at the time. Perhaps you could point to any prosecutions resulting from these allegations?
I expected more concrete revelations from the documentary. The "new evidence" is tenuous at best.
About 4 years ago I received a call from a detective who was checking out a statement made by a deceased relative, who had reported seeing an English registered car near Cashelard a few days before Mary's disappearance. They were following up every witness statement 35 years after the event, so I don't believe the case has been as neglected as many seem to believe.

oranbhoy67 · 05-07-2016 7:07pm

SafeSurfer wrote: »

It may break Garda rules but it is hardly evidence of Collusion in child murder. I know one of the guards who made allegations in the 80s. There was a Today Tonight programme on it at the time. Perhaps you could point to any prosecutions resulting from these allegations?
I expected more concrete revelations from the documentary. The "new evidence" is tenuous at best.
About 4 years ago I received a call from a detective who was checking out a statement made by a deceased relative, who had reported seeing an English registered car near Cashelard a few days before Mary's disappearance. They were following up every witness statement 35 years after the event, so I don't believe the case has been as neglected as many seem to believe.

ill tell you how much the case has been neglected , i went to Ballyshannon Garda station to make a statement and the guard who asked me down had went home in the meantime, i was put on the phone to him and he said he was desperate to chat to me but had a big case on and would contact me the next week and took my number

that was 2 months ago not a peep since I rang his station last week and he rang back to tell me he was on holidays and would speak to me this week .... you can guess the rest

brooke 2 · 05-07-2016 8:36pm

JinkyJackson wrote: »

Na sorry. If my own brother raped and murdered my little daughter, I wouldn't care about anything only him getting locked up for it.

Mary Boyles mother is a discusting person if she's knowingly letting a rapist and murderer roam free.

I agree. I am not condoning what she is doing, just trying to rationalise it
in some way. As I've said before, she is typical of the kind of person from
remote areas in Ireland, and possibly in other countries, who do not want
outsiders to know their business. Life must have been intolerable for her husband,
knowing/suspecting what he did, with a wife who was clearly
prepared to let her daughter's killer escape justice.

brooke 2 · 05-07-2016 8:47pm

oranbhoy67 wrote: »

I was at the scene a few months ago , the local taxi driver didnt even know how to get to it, you have to drive up a long twisting private (but there was no signs and gates were open) lane to get there

Its also on an exposed hillside and there was poachers on the lake that day who had a lookout on the hill who saw no strange vehicles. for me to walk from the front door of the house to the main road took about 15 minutes & I am 6"2 tall , i didnt even attempt to retrace Marys "final journey" as the land was so rough looking

That was something which came out in the documentary - how a six-year-old could not possibly have climbed
over those walls between her grandparents' house and the neighbour's house, as she would have had to do,
if she had followed her uncle as he said she did.

brooke 2 · 05-07-2016 9:00pm

Going Forward wrote: »

Because I was naive.

I believed the unbelievable account that was given, that he had nothing to do with it.

I had thought of how guilty he must have felt letting her out of his sight, all the time
thinking she was following him.

Looking around and not seeing her.

Then finding out she was missing.

Did many berate him for letting her out of his sight, I don't know, I don't remember anyone saying that here very much, certainly not like the McCanns were berated.

That is how the story has always been presented in the press. I also remember feeling sorry for the
uncle when he discovered his little niece was no longer following him, even though I did feel he might
have kept a closer eye on a child so young. However, until last night, I did not realise how rough the
terrain was. Most responsible people would have held on tightly to a child in such an area which posed
many dangers for a youngster. Oh, the irony of that last sentence!!

jenny smith · 05-07-2016 9:06pm

oranbhoy67 wrote: »

what do you think of the mother refusing to allow an inquest , do you think its right she should even be allowed to do that?

as for this quote from you

What had the politician or the superintendent to gain from a cover up? There has never been any suggestion that either were involved in anything sinister to the best of my knowledge

I have on my computer here screenshots from a Donegal Democrat front page article from 1985 that says the politician and the superintendent were very close and that rank and file Gardai believed they were impeded in doing their job in trying to investigate any of his business deals because of this relationship not what I would call sinister but still allegations of Gardai/Political intervention on cases , I won't post it here because it contains the politicians name, im not scared of libel I have nothing to lose but I'm scared it will result in any potential mistrial of any suspects in the future .

also what do you think of the revelation that the superintendent attended a Fianna Fail function which is strictly against Gardai rules?

Can't you blank out the names? I know who the politician is but would like to see the article

brooke 2 · 05-07-2016 9:22pm

oranbhoy67 wrote: »

ill tell you how much the case has been neglected , i went to Ballyshannon Garda station to make a statement and the guard who asked me down had went home in the meantime, i was put on the phone to him and he said he was desperate to chat to me but had a big case on and would contact me the next week and took my number

that was 2 months ago not a peep since I rang his station last week and he rang back to tell me he was on holidays and would speak to me this week .... you can guess the rest

Sounds like something from Maurice McCabe's account of the gardaí in Cavan,
especially in connection with the taxi driver, Mary Lynch, who was attacked.

oranbhoy67 · 05-07-2016 10:19pm

jenny smith wrote: »

Can't you blank out the names? I know who the politician is but would like to see the article

I'm going to try and do this I was out all night playing football tonight just in, someone has already had a go on the copy I have using an editing tool so its a bit messy but ill have a go

oranbhoy67 · 05-07-2016 10:21pm

brooke 2 wrote: »

That was something which came out in the documentary - how a six-year-old could not possibly have climbed
over those walls between her grandparents' house and the neighbour's house, as she would have had to do,
if she had followed her uncle as he said she did.

yes and stone walls are my trade and having seen these ones trust me that these walls werent climbable for most adults never mind a 6-year-old

jenny smith · 05-07-2016 10:38pm

oranbhoy67 wrote: »

I'm going to try and do this I was out all night playing football tonight just in, someone has already had a go on the copy I have using an editing tool so its a bit messy but ill have a go

is the screenshot a jpeg file?

jenny smith · 05-07-2016 10:42pm

In the doc Mary's mother is hown on Nationwide on RTE asking if anyone knows anything to tell the gardai in confidence? would the rte people have known about the suspect? Surely they would have heard it researching it and they let her go saying that. There is another would you believe with Charlie and Mary I have not seen.

Why did Gardai destroy possible burial site of Irelands longest missing child?

Comments