Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Aer Lingus Fleet/ Routes Discussion Pt 2 (ALL possible routes included)

1969799101102141

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,243 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    On its way at the moment!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,492 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Unpressurized presumably. Why Cincinatti though?

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users Posts: 131 ✭✭Astral Nav


    Because a specialist repair company with Airbus approval for structural repairs might be based there?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 893 ✭✭✭HTCOne


    Exactly. Otherwise you're looking at IAD-BGR-YYT-KEF-PIK-TLS or similar at that altitude.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,492 ✭✭✭✭Hotblack Desiato


    Well yeah I was hoping somone might be able to answer that question!

    Scrap the cap!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,060 ✭✭✭Sexual Chocolate


    Wouldn't even come to that surely with the Alabama facility ?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 893 ✭✭✭HTCOne


    Do they do the repair you need, how much do they charge and when do they next have a hangar slot available? That'll come into it too.



  • Registered Users Posts: 45 chasing_ghosts


    I'm currently on an internship at a small leasing company, and everyone seems to fly in business whenever they're called to various spots around the world. Maybe it's an exception but from what I can see - they could do with making economy the only option!



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,206 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    Finance people have little care for cost and leasing companies are literally swimming in cash so enjoy it while it lasts, grab all the airmiles



  • Registered Users Posts: 102 ✭✭goodlad_ourvlad


    name of wifi system that uses VHF/UHF as backhaul over land?



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,547 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    Gogo in the US use UHF (850Mhz) and microwave (3Ghz) for ground to air internet.



  • Registered Users Posts: 102 ✭✭goodlad_ourvlad


    I'm aware of their service, I'm not aware of a European service yet?



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,547 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    There's 5G Air to Ground in Europe, which might actually dip as low as UHF frequencies; I'm not sure and can't quickly find what they use.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 893 ✭✭✭HTCOne


    From what I’ve read, in Germany Deutsche Telekom and in France Orange are providing VHF/UHF A2G internet for airlines.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,560 ✭✭✭Noxegon


    Icelandair and Finnair both have WiFi on board their short haul flights. No idea what they use.

    I develop Superior Solitaire when I'm not procrastinating on boards.ie.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 69,547 ✭✭✭✭L1011


    It would have to be satellite based for Icelandair considering the lack of ground under much of their routes. Usually Ku-band



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,609 ✭✭✭California Dreamer


    Talking about this stuff in this thread is almost as pointless as talking about Las Vegas! 😗😉🤔



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 796 ✭✭✭MICKEYG


    Flew KLM during the week.

    App is so far ahead of Aer Lingus. Gate updates, time updates etc. Delivered immediately. Able to change your seat without issue even after boarding pass is issued.

    I imagine you can check in online if a multi city booking but can't confirm. All I know is it is beyond Aer Lingus.

    None of this is hard to do if the will is there.



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,251 ✭✭✭kevinandrew


    The Aer Lingus app is light years behind its nearest rivals, it hasn’t actually advanced in terms of basic capabilities since they first launched it over a decade ago.

    You can book flights, add some extras and check in pretty easily but everything else is either a clumsy mess or simply not possible.

    Ryanair delivers gate information, often in advance of the airport boards and even its on board menu is a simplified, app friendly version available to view offline. Aer Lingus only started uploading their menu to the app this year and then it took them a couple of months to make it available offline. Worse still, it’s just the PDF of the printed menu which isn’t ideal for phone screens.

    They can change the way the app and website look however many times they want but it’s pointless if the technology behind it is still decades too old.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,243 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    The Aer Lingus app (on android) doesn't even let you save your boarding pass or add it to Google wallet. Every time I try, it complains about not having storage access permission, yet when I go to the settings to enable them, the app supposedly doesn't ask for them!




  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,930 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    I flew with them in July. The app worked for me. First time I added the boarding card to my Google wallet



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,243 ✭✭✭p_haugh


    Hopefully it's fixed then, haven't used it recently as I haven't flown with them since May 🤞



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 714 ✭✭✭ricimaki


    IAG are looking to place a widebody order.

    Article talks about BA's 777's replacements being the target, but could any aircraft be destined for Aer Lingus?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,251 ✭✭✭kevinandrew


    I’d like to think so but Aer Lingus will be very lucky to see anything out of these negotiations. It’s a small fish in a very big pond and when it comes to getting new aircraft, BA and IB have stronger cases.

    Although the two visits to Shamrock House by Boeing in recent months does suggest something is in the works.

    The 787-10 would be an ideal A333 replacement in terms of capacity and capabilities. It can do everything they need while boosting capacity and allowing the introduction of a premium economy. Downside is losing the current fleet commonality but the long term advantages may outweigh that. In the end it’ll all come down to what the manufacturer offers.

    Post edited by kevinandrew on


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,437 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    BA has a much more varied set of wide bodies than IB which is solely Airbus. bA’s 772 are all year 2000 vintage - tail numbers are G-YMM- (YMM = Year 2000) and likely up for replacement. (YMMM having gone to the graveyard in the sky back in 2004 following the short landing at Heathrow.). Logically, you could see the. Mixing and matching with IB to have. A fleet which could be used by both t but then flight crew would need to be fungible as well which might not be as easy.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 202 ✭✭Gary walsh 32


    Looks like ei nsa is stuck in lhr again



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,060 ✭✭✭Sexual Chocolate


    There's a thread on airliners.net about this order where some people are really going into detail as to the advantages pro cons ect on the difference between the 78X and both A350s. From what I've gathered in between all the bickering is that the 78Xis the better medium haul performer (7-9hrs) where as the a350 is better on longer flights (+9hrs). And the 78X has two extra economy rows in a typical layout over the A359.

    List price between the two isn't too far different but that becomes irrelevant very quickly when airlines go to purchase.

    The IGW that the 78X is supposed to be getting is expected to add on roughly 400nm bringing it's range up to 6700 with full pax and bag and I believe excluding cargo.

    And somewhere in between all of that the A330neo fits in nicely.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,609 ✭✭✭California Dreamer


    Word on the street is 2 more QR 330 joining the fleet for next summer. But could depend on delivery slots of new QR aircraft.



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 4,185 Mod ✭✭✭✭Locker10a


    Interesting, is there really a need ?

    I had thought the current fleet covered the schedule next year



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,560 ✭✭✭Noxegon


    I gather that EIL and EIK are being refitted, so perhaps management wanted a few more frames with non-standard seating in order to maintain what has become the expected lottery when flying Aer Lingus long haul?

    I develop Superior Solitaire when I'm not procrastinating on boards.ie.



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,930 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    15 airframes cover the current planned Summer schedule (including the new routes to MSP and DEN)



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,069 ✭✭✭EchoIndia


    There will be a new A21N by next summer also: EI-LRI.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,927 ✭✭✭Van.Bosch


    Maybe something new will be announced - DUB or MAN.



  • Registered Users Posts: 368 ✭✭moonshy2022


    Rumour mill has Man all 321LR/XLR next summer.



  • Registered Users Posts: 368 ✭✭moonshy2022


    Small fish ? BA are looking for 20. But EI to make it work crew wise could easily order a full fleet replacement and get 13-15 with options. That makes them more than a small fish. I say 13-15 because what would the point be in going half way and having half your crews tied down to a small fleet of Boeings. Rumours were MAXs were on the table so order could be even larger from EIs side of the house.



  • Registered Users Posts: 150 ✭✭Qaanaaq


    Well with the level of lease in’s this summer I guess that it’s insufficient.



  • Registered Users Posts: 150 ✭✭Qaanaaq


    I thought EI already had all the 321LR that were ordered? And nothing more until the XLR.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 893 ✭✭✭HTCOne


    A21N is the ICAO code for the A321Neo....ie all Neo variants of the A321.

    Edit: I might have misunderstood both posts. I assumed EI-LRI was to be the first XLR....but given the timeline it sounds like an LR?

    Post edited by HTCOne on


  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,930 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    I thought the XLRs weren't to be delivered until end of 2024?


    Unless EI got/asked for an additional LR to bridge the gap?



  • Registered Users Posts: 11 Bocages75


    You need some new sources mate.

    MAN might get a NEO to compliment the 2 current 330s (or another 330) next year but an all narrow body operation is not being discussed anywhere.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,496 ✭✭✭donkey balls


    Obviously having one fleet costs less on MX and crewing, and spares, What would happen if EI were to replicate BA cost wise?

    Would love to go back in to aviation but the hours would kill me.



  • Registered Users Posts: 368 ✭✭moonshy2022


    Firstly I said rumour mill, secondly it is being spoken about, you might just be behind the curve on this one. Also I’m satisfied with my source they are solid.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,060 ✭✭✭Sexual Chocolate




  • Registered Users Posts: 11 Bocages75


    how will the NEO get to MCO and BGI or are those sources also suggesting Ei are going to cease 2 of their 3 routes in Manchester next year ?



  • Registered Users Posts: 1,251 ✭✭✭kevinandrew


    The first XLR isn’t due until at least Q3 of next year but we all know how Airbus deliveries have been in recent years so you can expect that to slip slightly before then. The expected delivery coincides with their plans to make DUB-MSP daily from Q4, something they highlighted during the route announcement a couple of months ago.

    So we can rule out the XLR for Manchester next summer.

    As for the current batch of available LRs in operation, unless there’s considerable reshuffling of the fleet, there simply isn’t enough to cover moving any of them to Manchester.

    Finally, there’s the minor issues of range, cargo and capacity. Not enough range, nowhere near enough cargo space and while loads are hit and miss, an average of 70-80% in summer on the A333 is way above what the A321LR can handle.

    In the schedules MAN-BGI appears to be getting a longer season and will now end in late May with MAN-MCO going daily from the beginning of June. JFK unchanged at daily.

    That’s not to say an A321 wouldn’t be ideal for Manchester, I’ve raised this point before but the lack of fleet flexibility for EIUK hampers its potential; the A333 is fine for peak summer and UK school holidays but simply too large in the dead of winter. Strong cargo demand, influenced by IAG Cargo, has apparently been a factor.



  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 9,930 Mod ✭✭✭✭Tenger


    Another thing to consider regarding "rumoured" fleet plans is that plans change all the time. The confirmed plan first week of September may be different to the confirmed plan 6 weeks later.

    Im pretty sure that an all A321LR base in Manchester was discussed and examined. This is what planning/operations people do. They assess options, present them to the Execs and a forward plan comes together. The advantages of lower operating costs and fleet interoperability has its advantages, the lack of range for BGI and MCO is the disadvantage.


    Thus I rarely scoff at "rumours" as they usually have a basis in fact. Rumours may be just that, or they may be a hint of a possible/discarded plan.


    *I certainly dismissed the "A321LR operating DUB-DOH as a codeshare with Qatar" rumour with hardly a thought. It was ridiculous.



  • Registered Users Posts: 202 ✭✭Gary walsh 32


    Booked faro for July early flight so be getting an a330 3rd time lucky I might actually fly on one previous 2 were cancelled because of covid



  • Registered Users Posts: 409 ✭✭sherology


    The LR will disappear over time as it's really just a stopgap model Airbus developed when they baulked back in the last recession at the intended (and soon to be dominant) XLR. EI could well do with an a321neo - even a few - to do the bucket and spade, and high volume routes, so it may well just be a standard all economy model with about 230+ seats. More economical than an a330 as it's right sized for year round, and plenty of room for baggage without all those extra fuel tanks aka. the LR.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,206 ✭✭✭goingnowhere


    The fleet plan for the LR allows for conversion to shorthaul high density, the seat numbering already reflects this (over wing exits on all EI A32x aircraft is 12/13).

    There is also a door behind the wing which is plugged on the EI LR's which would be needed to meet evac requirements in high density config. The extra fuel tanks are all removable on the LR, they are structural on the XLR

    LR is still a great aircraft for IE-US East Coast, bear in mind the XLR costs more than the LR to purchase, has a higher MTOW so higher ATC fees.

    They are leased so EI will have the option to return them or extend the lease at some point



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,814 ✭✭✭Captain_Crash


    @goingnowhere the overwing exits on the 321 are at rows 14/15, but yes the doors at 3L/R are plugged and are quick and easy to activate if/when the config changes.



Advertisement