Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

the 'there's no such thing as a stupid question' bike maintenance thread

1457910128

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,772 ✭✭✭cython


    Milk_Tray wrote: »
    when you look at wheels (carbon) and they say 40/40 or 60/60 or 80/101, what does that mean? And why would you have either set over another?

    I think that's generally the rim depths in mm, presumably written in the form of front/rear. All else being equal (i.e. same style of wheel, since not all carbon wheel rim shapes/sections are necessarily equally performant - that's a whole other discussion and warrants its own research), the deeper the rim, generally the greater the aero advantage. However deeper rims come at the cost of handling/control in windy conditions, especially with cross winds since the deeper rim catches the wind. This is why if there is a differential in the rim depths, the shallower is normally on the front, to minimise the impact on steering, since the back wheel doesn't turn.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,731 ✭✭✭Type 17


    Joe1919 wrote: »
    Just a comment. Dry lube contains a solvent, so its often recommended to shake the bottle and to allow a few hours for the solvent to evaporate after application before using the bike. (It may be better to use after a ride than before)

    This is correct - the idea of dry lube is that you apply the liquid and then wait until the solvent has evaporated, leaving a waxy, minimally sticky residue.

    Personally, I don't think dry lube is worthwhile in Irish/Northern European weather - it is designed for arid, semi desert conditions such as southern Europe & the south-western US, where truly dusty conditions exist - wet, sticky oil in those conditions is a disaster, as the dust sticks to the wet oil and forms a perfect grinding paste which wears drivetrains very quickly.

    However, in Ireland, every time it rains, or the roads are wet, you will need to change your dry lube for the wet version, or the dry stuff is washed away and your chain is naked - how many days will you get out of dry lube before you need to change to wet again. I see it like winter tyres for cars - they work really well, but you only need them once a decade...


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,189 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    Type 17 wrote: »
    Suggestion: if it was a wrestle to get the tyre on, perhaps the tyre-bead got bent - this would make the tyre sit consistently badly in the same place afterwards - a slight kink in the wires can be straightened with your fingers, but if it's a sharp kink, check that none of the wires has broken after straightening.
    i decided to rotate the tyres, and after swapping the two over, the issue has followed the tyre, and not the inner tube or wheel. maybe the problem tyre has an issue seating which i've not yet figured out. no issue with the bead being kinked anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 543 ✭✭✭Crocked


    Have an old triple groupset and an old frame and decided to build it up to use on the turbo. When in the highest gear, 50-12 I think, the chain is rubbing against the inside of the dropout.

    Would I be right in thinking that the issue maybe that not all frames can take a triple groupset?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,731 ✭✭✭Type 17


    Crocked wrote: »
    Have an old triple groupset and an old frame and decided to build it up to use on the turbo. When in the highest gear, 50-12 I think, the chain is rubbing against the inside of the dropout.

    Would I be right in thinking that the issue maybe that not all frames can take a triple groupset?

    If the chain is rubbing at the rear (bottom of right-hand seat-stay), then it's the fact that the older frame probably had a rear wheel with less sprockets (and therefore had more space between the smallest sprocket and the frame).

    You can fix the rub by adding a few washers onto the axle on the inside of the frame, but there will probably be issues with stretching the frame, axle-length, etc, but you will be ok if it's only for turbo trainer use.

    If you do want to use the wheel and frame together on the road, then look at stuff like cold-setting the frame (if it's steel), chain line(s), re-spacing the axle and then re-dishing the wheel, etc.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 755 ✭✭✭topcat77


    Hi All.

    Just a quick question regarding brake fluid compatibility.

    I'm using dot5.1 on my avid brakes and i've just bought a new set of clarks exo Skeletal brakes for the hybrid. These brakes use dot4. From what i gather the only difference in the fluid is the boiling point.

    So the question is can i use the dot5.1 fluid on the clarks as i don't want to go out and buy more fluid. (just opened a new dot5.1 bottle)?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,457 ✭✭✭ford2600


    Type 17 wrote: »
    This is correct - the idea of dry lube is that you apply the liquid and then wait until the solvent has evaporated, leaving a waxy, minimally sticky residue.

    Personally, I don't think dry lube is worthwhile in Irish/Northern European weather - it is designed for arid, semi desert conditions such as southern Europe & the south-western US, where truly dusty conditions exist - wet, sticky oil in those conditions is a disaster, as the dust sticks to the wet oil and forms a perfect grinding paste which wears drivetrains very quickly.

    However, in Ireland, every time it rains, or the roads are wet, you will need to change your dry lube for the wet version, or the dry stuff is washed away and your chain is naked - how many days will you get out of dry lube before you need to change to wet again. I see it like winter tyres for cars - they work really well, but you only need them once a decade...

    http://www.rocklube.com/products.html

    The purple extreme one of these is brilliant for Irish conditions.

    No matter how rough conditions on road bike I never applied under 300km intervals and above that in dry conditions.

    Chain was under .75% wear after 9k km on a well used drivetrain; cassettes with 20k or so and a crank which started with double that.

    9-10 300km rides with quite a few wet.

    Just follow the instructions it's not applied like any other lube.

    Not a cost saver, certainly not with €15 chains, €20 cassettes but a time/faff saver and no squeaking.

    After getting about 20k out of 2 4oz bottles and took delivery of a 20oz bottle.

    Imo, unless you want to spend your time cleaning chain after every spin wet lube just makes the perfect paste for wearing a chain quickly.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,189 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    i decided to rotate the tyres, and after swapping the two over, the issue has followed the tyre, and not the inner tube or wheel. maybe the problem tyre has an issue seating which i've not yet figured out. no issue with the bead being kinked anyway.
    finally got the flat spot sorted - with lots of soapy water, and after multiple removals and reseatings (my thumbs are poxy sore now). i think possibly as the tyre was inflating , it wasn't evenly distributed around the rim, but there was too much friction where there was an excess to allow it to slide around (may not be making any sense here). anyway, lots of soapy water, and pumping it past my usual level (i usually pump to 80 or 90), got it sorted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,863 ✭✭✭✭crosstownk


    ford2600 wrote: »
    http://www.rocklube.com/products.html

    The purple extreme one of these is brilliant for Irish conditions.

    No matter how rough conditions on road bike I never applied under 300km intervals and above that in dry conditions.

    Chain was under .75% wear after 9k km on a well used drivetrain; cassettes with 20k or so and a crank which started with double that.

    Sounds interesting. What chain do use?

    I've been using Muc Off Hydrodynamic for the last year and while it's a standard lube that's easy to apply, it doesn't attract as much sh1te and grime as a regular wet lube but it seems to wash away after a short wet spin. No really noticeable extension in chain life from it either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,011 ✭✭✭✭Wishbone Ash


    Fitted full length proper mudguards to my commuter singlespeed/fixie recently (thanks to Ole Rodrigo for a link regarding clips for the fork/seat stay for frames without lugs). I was delighted with my work - really neat and close fitting.

    .......until I went to clean the bike this morning and realised that I'd neglected to leave enough clearance to allow the back wheel to slide back out of the drop outs.

    Now I have to remove the rear mudguard any time I wish to remove the wheel. Bummer! :(


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,189 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,011 ✭✭✭✭Wishbone Ash


    anyone ever try this?...
    Looks like a lot of hassle - easier just to buy a new chain more regularly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,863 ✭✭✭✭crosstownk


    anyone ever try this?
    No but it's something I'd like to try - just to see what it's all about. I'd do it more out of nerdy interest than anything else :)
    Looks like a lot of hassle - easier just to buy a new chain more regularly.

    I agree that it's easier to but a new chain but the one benefit I see is that the wax is less likely to attract dirt and other road grime meaning less cleaning and this could useful on the commute bike because finding the time to clean the chain during the week can be difficult.


  • Posts: 0 ✭✭✭✭ Mary Gentle Sterilization


    Any of you ever done a bike maintenance course? I see a few places offer them in the €60-80 range for an introductory course.

    Are they worth it, do you learn anything useful, if so any recommendation where to go? I've probably spent €120 this year on bike maintenance (i.e paying people to do it!) but I've a feeling I could spend a lot less doing it myself.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,440 ✭✭✭cdaly_


    topcat77 wrote: »
    Hi All.

    Just a quick question regarding brake fluid compatibility.

    I'm using dot5.1 on my avid brakes and i've just bought a new set of clarks exo Skeletal brakes for the hybrid. These brakes use dot4. From what i gather the only difference in the fluid is the boiling point.

    So the question is can i use the dot5.1 fluid on the clarks as i don't want to go out and buy more fluid. (just opened a new dot5.1 bottle)?

    My understanding of brake fluid is that dot4 and dot5.1 are fully compatible.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,863 ✭✭✭✭crosstownk


    cdaly_ wrote: »
    My understanding of brake fluid is that dot4 and dot5.1 are fully compatible.

    Yep - DOT 5.1 has a higher boiling point than DOT 3 and 4 and all three can be mixed (obviously the lower boiling point applies).

    DOT 5 is silicone based and cannot be mixed with the other glycol based fluids.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,189 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    Any of you ever done a bike maintenance course? I see a few places offer them in the €60-80 range for an introductory course.
    i'd guess they're fairly basic and are probably the sort of thing you'd only need if you were a complete newbie. youtube would probably cover most of what you'd learn in these courses?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,484 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    i'd guess they're fairly basic and are probably the sort of thing you'd only need if you were a complete newbie. youtube would probably cover most of what you'd learn in these courses?
    I've done the biking.ie one, which was run in Sandyford. It was basically going through a service - pads, gear cables, gear indexing, head set service iirc. Cables and bearings and grease/ cleaning products provided, so really just bike and whatever tools you have. I felt the cost was somewhat off set as you essentially had the bike serviced!

    I don't know whether I couldn't have done it myself from youtube, but has definitely given me the confidence to at least try!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,153 ✭✭✭Joe1919



    I completely dismantle the chain and clean and grease before reassembly!

    chain-apart.jpg
    http://www.sheldonbrown.com/chainclean.html


  • Registered Users Posts: 528 ✭✭✭All My Stars Aligned


    Joe1919 wrote: »
    I completely dismantle the chain and clean and grease before reassembly!

    chain-apart.jpg
    http://www.sheldonbrown.com/chainclean.html

    Is this a piss take? who in their right mine would disassemble a chain to clean it???


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,731 ✭✭✭Type 17


    Is this a piss take?

    Yes, yes it is. :p


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    I have an FSA square taper bottom bracket and whilst replacing the pedals, I noticed that there is some play in the crankset. The bike is only six months old, would this just mean tightening of the bracket, or a new BB?

    is it dangerous?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 728 ✭✭✭D13exile


    One chastised biker here!

    I've always thought my bike is better looked after than average, washed after each ride, chain cleaned, brakes adjusted etc. So it was with a feeling akin to being told that I'd neglected my children to get a phone call from my local bike shop (where I'd dropped my trusty steed in for a service) to be told that:
    1. The front derailleur had seized
    2. The rear wheel hub bearings were beyond repair because of rust and grime
    3. The headset bearings were also rusted and full of grime

    Naturally I thought they were taking the urine but following a call down to view the dismantled parts, I was really taken aback at how these parts were deteriorated. Now I don't soak my bike when I wash it and I dry it off if it rains while I'm out and about, plus the bike lives in the house, not a shed. So it was a shock to see the rusted bearings in the hub and headset plus to see a seized front derailleur. Naturally to make it up to my bike, I got a new front derailleur, new headset bearings and I bought two Mavic Aksiums (one to replace the almost seized rear wheel and the other to match the new one) as a "sorry" to my bike.

    Guess there's more to bike maintenance than a clean drivetrain and frame:o


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,189 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    had the headset rotted from the bottom up?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 728 ✭✭✭D13exile


    Yes it had. They packed it with grease when they put in the new one. How to stop that happening again?

    Nitpicking here but they failed to index the gears when they put new gear cables in. Was out for a 53km spin today and the gears wouldn't change properly when I clicked the shifter. I hate stopping when I'm out on the bike but it was driving me nuts so off I get and index them on the side of the road.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,442 ✭✭✭LollipopJimmy


    Are you powerhosing the bike? Or being overly generous with the hose?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,863 ✭✭✭✭crosstownk


    I had similar with the bike I use for commuting. I took a apart the headset to regrease it and I was shocked to find that the lower bearing had come apart and the ball bearings were brown and rusted looking. I washed the lot in degreaser and gave it a thorough clean, regreased and put it back in as I didn't have time to wait for a new one to be delivered. That was probably 5,000km ago and it's still fine.

    I put it down to having no front mudguard and all the water spray from the tyres is getting lashed into the lower bearing.

    Similarly, my front hub bearing is starting to make noise - it still spins freely and stops with the valve in the six o'clock position every time. It's probably time to service the hubs after 20,000km!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,731 ✭✭✭Type 17


    Aegir wrote: »
    I have an FSA square taper bottom bracket and whilst replacing the pedals, I noticed that there is some play in the crankset. The bike is only six months old, would this just mean tightening of the bracket, or a new BB?

    is it dangerous?

    If it's only 6 months old, it's 90% likely that the BB unit has come loose in the frame, rather than the BB unit itself is faulty.

    It's not dangerous to you, but do get the place you bought it to tighten it (should be for free) soon enough, as long-term riding with it loose will wear the threads in the frame.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,731 ✭✭✭Type 17


    D13exile wrote: »
    Yes it had. They packed it with grease when they put in the new one. How to stop that happening again?

    Nitpicking here but they failed to index the gears when they put new gear cables in. Was out for a 53km spin today and the gears wouldn't change properly when I clicked the shifter. I hate stopping when I'm out on the bike but it was driving me nuts so off I get and index them on the side of the road.

    The only way to prevent the front wheel from flooding the lower headset race is to fit a mudguard. I see it a lot (two today alone). It occurs to me that, for those whose bike is too cool for mudguards ;) , someone could design a clip-on "skirt" that would prevent direct spray from the wheel from hitting the gap between the fork crown and frame.

    The shop probably did index the gears, but didn't pre-stretch the inner wires - they might have forgotten or, on bikes with internal cable routing, it's harder to do - the cables finished stretching on your spin...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,684 ✭✭✭triggermortis


    Quick headset question... Do these need to be pre-tensioned to help them bed in or is it more of a fit and forget?
    I got mine replaced recently while it was all in pieces (the bike) and now I can't get it right. It loosened a little after the first few spins, so much so that if I rocked the bike against the front brake, the stem moves. I tightened it again, but the steering wasn't as free as it need to be. I loosesned it and packed both sides with grease - even though they are sealed bearings - and refitted it all, but I can't seem to get the feel right. Right now the front doesn't move when I rock against the brake but the steering feels a little too stiff


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,731 ✭✭✭Type 17


    Should be fit and forget, or fit and then readjust after the first ride, if play develops as something settles a little more.

    Your issue sounds like something is fouling - perhaps check to see that nothing is upside down (common if there's a separate rubber seal), or pressed on slightly crooked.
    Also, check if the top cap (under the spacers, usually has the maker's name on it) is touching the top of the frame (fully integrated type) or the top bearing race (semi-integrated) - if so, your LBS should have a few spare shims to separate things as required.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,684 ✭✭✭triggermortis


    Type 17 wrote: »
    Should be fit and forget, or fit and then readjust after the first ride, if play develops as something settles a little more.

    Your issue sounds like something is fouling - perhaps check to see that nothing is upside down (common if there's a separate rubber seal), or pressed on slightly crooked.
    Also, check if the top cap (under the spacers, usually has the maker's name on it) is touching the top of the frame (fully integrated type) or the top bearing race (semi-integrated) - if so, your LBS should have a few spare shims to separate things as required.

    Thanks. I'll have another look at it tomorrow if I get time, or maybe mess with it tonight before I ride home (depends how cold it is..) after work.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 728 ✭✭✭D13exile


    Are you powerhosing the bike? Or being overly generous with the hose?

    No. I never use a power hose on the bike and when I wash it, I mostly use muc-off to get rid of the heavy grime and then a light sprinkle with the hose to wash the detergent off.
    crosstownk wrote: »
    I had similar with the bike I use for commuting. I took a apart the headset to regrease it and I was shocked to find that the lower bearing had come apart and the ball bearings were brown and rusted looking. I washed the lot in degreaser and gave it a thorough clean, regreased and put it back in as I didn't have time to wait for a new one to be delivered. That was probably 5,000km ago and it's still fine.

    I put it down to having no front mudguard and all the water spray from the tyres is getting lashed into the lower bearing.

    Similarly, my front hub bearing is starting to make noise - it still spins freely and stops with the valve in the six o'clock position every time. It's probably time to service the hubs after 20,000km!!
    Type 17 wrote: »
    The only way to prevent the front wheel from flooding the lower headset race is to fit a mudguard. I see it a lot (two today alone). It occurs to me that, for those whose bike is too cool for mudguards ;) , someone could design a clip-on "skirt" that would prevent direct spray from the wheel from hitting the gap between the fork crown and frame.

    The shop probably did index the gears, but didn't pre-stretch the inner wires - they might have forgotten or, on bikes with internal cable routing, it's harder to do - the cables finished stretching on your spin...

    I use a rear mudguard on the bike but not a front one. Guess I'll have to get one to stop the water ingres into the headset in future.


  • Posts: 0 [Deleted User]


    Just a quick one re: shimano sti shifters, are they the same for standard breaks as for mechanical discs? Or do I need to look for a disc specific one (sora/9speed) :confused:

    I'm assuming the same.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 469 ✭✭Zen0


    Just a quick one re: shimano sti shifters, are they the same for standard breaks as for mechanical discs? Or do I need to look for a disc specific one (sora/9speed) :confused:

    I'm assuming the same.

    Yes, the rim brake ones work fine with mechanical discs.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 221 ✭✭Milk_Tray


    Can someone explain the advantage of a 3 spoke carbon wheel? Why use this over a normal spoked wheel etc? (Triathlon based question)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,731 ✭✭✭Type 17


    The three big spokes don’t have to meet the hub near the ends of the axle, like a traditional spoked wheel, so the wind resistance is much lower as the spokes “hide” behind the width of the tyre.


  • Registered Users Posts: 221 ✭✭Milk_Tray


    Type 17 wrote: »
    The three big spokes don’t have to meet the hub near the ends of the axle, like a traditional spoked wheel, so the wind resistance is much lower as the spokes “hide” behind the width of the tyre.

    Why wouldnt everyone use one? Whats the negatives of something like that I guess..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,684 ✭✭✭triggermortis


    I put my new(to me) wheels on my commuter bike today. Swapped over the cassette but found I couldn’t get all my gears. Spent an age fiddling trying to index them. Rode around the garden a bit to see if that made any difference - it didn’t. When I applied the back brake - to avoid running over the cat - the brake didn’t release.
    The bike has been sitting for a while unused so I figured it just needed a good clean. Took the brake off and cleaned it all up. Refitted it and nothing had changed. Cable runs ok but the brake sticks on. When it’s in my hand it opens and closes fine.
    Gave up in frustration and cold and took it to my lbs as I had to go pick kids up from school. I’ll see what the story is later...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,684 ✭✭✭triggermortis


    Milk_Tray wrote: »
    Why wouldnt everyone use one? Whats the negatives of something like that I guess..

    Cost? Looks? I just don’t like the look personally


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,731 ✭✭✭Type 17


    Costs and cross-winds (which is why full-disc wheels faded from fashion very quickly).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,235 ✭✭✭✭Cee-Jay-Cee


    I put my new(to me) wheels on my commuter bike today. Swapped over the cassette but found I couldn’t get all my gears. Spent an age fiddling trying to index them. Rode around the garden a bit to see if that made any difference - it didn’t. When I applied the back brake - to avoid running over the cat - the brake didn’t release.
    The bike has been sitting for a while unused so I figured it just needed a good clean. Took the brake off and cleaned it all up. Refitted it and nothing had changed. Cable runs ok but the brake sticks on. When it’s in my hand it opens and closes fine.
    Gave up in frustration and cold and took it to my lbs as I had to go pick kids up from school. I’ll see what the story is later...

    Replace the cables, inner and outer for both brakes and gears. If the bike has been lying up a while then condensation/moisture will cause corrosion.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,684 ✭✭✭triggermortis


    Replace the cables, inner and outer for both brakes and gears. If the bike has been lying up a while then condensation/moisture will cause corrosion.

    Cables are all good. The brake had corrosion that I didn’t see as I didn’t fully take it apart. The wheel turns out to have an 11 speed hub on, which I didn’t realise. There was a 9 speed cassette on it, which I replaced with mine - not seeing any spacer there and that was the reason for not being able to get all my gears. Spacer fitted, gears now good


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,484 ✭✭✭Macy0161


    Will a 9 speed cassette fit on 10/11 speed hub (assuming compatible hub)? Will I need spacers or will it be straight on and then locknut?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,684 ✭✭✭triggermortis


    Macy0161 wrote: »
    Will a 9 speed cassette fit on 10/11 speed hub (assuming compatible hub)? Will I need spacers or will it be straight on and then locknut?

    Yes. There is a spacer you need to put on before the cassettte. I received one with a new wheel set for my winter bike.
    Just got one fitted to my commuter bike. The wheel previously had a 9 speed cassette so I might have a spare spacer I didn’t notice still with the cassette if you need one, or your lbs should have them


  • Registered Users Posts: 221 ✭✭Milk_Tray


    Looking for Cassette help for a TT bike..

    So presuming the rear is a standard 11/25, the front crank would be either 50/34 or 52/36. Whats the difference? Is the 52/36 designed at being able to faster downhill with hard cycling but more tougher going uphills?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,263 ✭✭✭✭Borderfox


    50-34 = Compact
    52-36 = mid compact
    53-39 = Double


  • Registered Users Posts: 221 ✭✭Milk_Tray


    Borderfox wrote: »
    50-34 = Compact
    52-36 = mid compact
    53-39 = Double

    what are the meaning of those terms?


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 50,189 CMod ✭✭✭✭magicbastarder


    the bigger the rings, the more 'traditional' the chainwheel is. as you mention, the smaller rings make it easier in the hills, but if it's a TT bike, you're probably not so concerned with hauling yourself up mountains on it?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 471 ✭✭dermabrasion


    I took a spill few days back landing on my right side. The derailleur hanger did not break off, but the drop-outs took the force and bent inwards. I only noticed that the cassette skipped upper cogs. Anyway, the frame is aluminium. The bike show said they were wary of bending the drop-out back (about 4 degrees)as this would effect the integrity of the aluminium. Aluminium does not like to be bent back unlike steel. They bent it back on my instruction.
    So, my question: Is the frame likely weakened by bending back the rear right dropout?


  • Advertisement
Advertisement