Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

2020 World Snooker Championship

1246782

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    Ford is a really odd sort of a player. I don't know what to make of him. One minute looks like a world beater. Next minute he just loses the head.

    He's 15 years a pro i think and only third time reaching the finals. Thats a poor return. Not a question of ability i dont think, more lacks belief in himself. That's impression i get with him anyway. Good enough to have been a solid top 16 guy for a few years.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,187 ✭✭✭waynescales1


    Hendry’s tally of 775 career centuries in an era when there were only 6-7 tournaments a year is absolutely monstrous.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,534 ✭✭✭Chalk McHugh


    I'm not a big fan of the 100 centuries in a season stat these days. So many tpurnaments that a top player, with the modern perfect table and ball conditions, should be getting close to that anyway. At least Trump didn't jump around like Robbo did few years back which was a little cringy and over the top.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    Thought Ford could have taken the pot on there instead of safety which was fraught with danger. Think thats it surely now anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    Hendry’s tally of 775 career centuries in an era when there were only 6-7 tournaments a year is absolutely monstrous.

    And i would add tighter and slower tables too.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,534 ✭✭✭Chalk McHugh


    I think Betty Ford would have as good a chance now of winning this.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,534 ✭✭✭Chalk McHugh


    Just as the pressure is off and Fordy probably feels it's over he comes up with a nice frame winning break.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,187 ✭✭✭waynescales1


    Hold on, 9-8.

    Like earlier in the match, Ford playing his best snooker when the pressure is off. Being behind with nothing to lose might suit him.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,534 ✭✭✭Chalk McHugh


    Great opening red from the reigning champion. Wont' be giving the silverware up without a mmassive fight. Hold it together now and it's on to round two.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,472 ✭✭✭Arthur Daley


    Great red in the open from JT. deserved to win the frame


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,534 ✭✭✭Chalk McHugh


    Fair play to Ford as he contributed to a good match but a few of us on here felt it at the time that he blew it when he had a great chance to lead 6-2.

    But it's great for the tournament to have the reigning champion progress because Judd is box office and puts bums on seats (at home on.our sofa's).

    Overall a very enjoyable opening days snooker.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    Potting some good ones in the finish there, so clean dont even touch the sides. Seems the trump pattern now, get the bad snooker out of the way R1 and then start going up through the gears.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,854 ✭✭✭zuutroy


    Hendry’s tally of 775 career centuries in an era when there were only 6-7 tournaments a year is absolutely monstrous.

    Hendry has played more qualifying tournaments than Ronnie and has 1 century per 15.2 frames to Ronnie's 1 in 10.9. Judd is better still at 10.6


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,755 ✭✭✭Inviere


    At least Trump didn't jump around like Robbo did few years back which was a little cringy and over the top.

    When Neil did it, he was the first player in the history of the game to do it...quite a feat really, despite the increase in tournaments etc. Watching it at the time, there was a lot of talk about it, and undoubtedly as he got nearer to it, the pressure ramped up. Once done, I'd say it was the relief of just getting there, and he could kinda forget about it then. No such fanfare for Judd doing it, as it had already been done.
    zuutroy wrote: »
    Hendry has played more qualifying tournaments than Ronnie and has 1 century per 15.2 frames to Ronnie's 1 in 10.9. Judd is better still at 10.6

    That's really the best way to measure it, given how many extra tournaments there are nowadays.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    Actually Dave Hendon indirectly brushed on this last night after Trump got the century and correctly referenced the modern conditions. It was a lot more difficult to compile centuries when hendry started out than it is now. I often wonder what he'd be like if he had these tables to play on, the speed of the cloth and ping off the cushions. He wasnt blessed with huge cue power so i believe would have been of particular benefit to him.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,534 ✭✭✭Chalk McHugh


    Inviere wrote: »
    When Neil did it, he was the first player in the history of the game to do it...quite a feat really, despite the increase in tournaments etc. Watching it at the time, there was a lot of talk about it, and undoubtedly as he got nearer to it, the pressure ramped up. Once done, I'd say it was the relief of just getting there, and he could kinda forget about it then. No such fanfare for Judd doing it, as it had already been done.



    That's really the best way to measure it, given how many extra tournaments there are nowadays.

    I remember Robbo was actually playing Judd at the time and Judd thought the over the top celebrations were uncalled for and said as much at the time.

    To be fair to him he was consistent when asked about getting 100 centuries in a season last night.' Nothing he ever aspired to as a snooker player' and he didn't make any deal of it. Nice to do it. No more. No less.

    Same with Ronnie getting the 1,000th century last year. First player to ever do it. No wild celebrations or fist pumps.

    Robbo celebrated like he just got a 147 which was a bit cringy.

    Personally, even though they are more frequent, i'd rate one 147 higher than 100 centuries in a season and i agree with Judd that 100 centuries is not something to celebrate.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,755 ✭✭✭Inviere


    Personally, even though they are more frequent, i'd rate one 147 higher than 100 centuries in a season and i agree with Judd that 100 centuries is not something to celebrate.

    I'd agree here, a 147 is a serious milestone. The 100 centuries in a season isn't something anyone would really aspire to achieve, & I doubt Neil ever did either...the celebration came from being the first to ever do it. Beyond that, it's a mere statistic herein.


  • Registered Users Posts: 85 ✭✭mistermiyagi


    Cracking win for Judd.
    Just like in the first round last year against Un Nooh, he got out of jail big time. Haunted to get through.
    Ideal start really, improving as the match went on. Minimum of best of 25 now, can't see Yan B or Slessor troubling him in round 2.
    Its a marathon not a sprint, best to save the best snooker for week 2. Robertson started off too well last year week 1, ran out of puff week 2.

    Can't see anyone beating Trump now, the curse is cursed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,904 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    zuutroy wrote: »
    Hendry has played more qualifying tournaments than Ronnie and has 1 century per 15.2 frames to Ronnie's 1 in 10.9. Judd is better still at 10.6
    Inviere wrote: »
    When Neil did it, he was the first player in the history of the game to do it...quite a feat really, despite the increase in tournaments etc. Watching it at the time, there was a lot of talk about it, and undoubtedly as he got nearer to it, the pressure ramped up. Once done, I'd say it was the relief of just getting there, and he could kinda forget about it then. No such fanfare for Judd doing it, as it had already been done.



    That's really the best way to measure it, given how many extra tournaments there are nowadays.

    I agree 100% don't know why they do not use centuries per frame in snooker. They use goals per game in soccer. But that does not take into account the opposition. Beauty about snooker is for a century it does not matter who the opponent is. A player is playing the table.

    Edit: I tweeted BBC Eurosport about it and the top 100's makers on twitter to see what they say.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    Good start by Maflin. Type of guy who could get on a roll and just blitz some guy. Flaky as heck though.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,854 ✭✭✭zuutroy


    Grim to see no one there. Even 25 or 50 a side is enough for it to seem at least slightly normal.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,904 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    zuutroy wrote: »
    Grim to see no one there. Even 25 or 50 a side is enough for it to seem at least slightly normal.

    Yeah sport is not the same without any crowd even snooker! Amazing the difference it makes.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,861 ✭✭✭Mysterypunter


    The sheriff of pottingham should be reinstated, considering there are no spectators in the crucible


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,861 ✭✭✭Mysterypunter


    No, he shouldn't. If he had the courage of his convictions then he wouldn't have entered qualifying and denied a spot to a struggling pro.

    A good point, but there were no spectators at the qualifiers, and shouldn't have been at the main event, its the same competition. Who do u like to win it out?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    Credit to Carty here. Making a game of this anyway.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 558 ✭✭✭bradolf pittler


    Squeeky bum time for Bingham.
    He's wilting badly and Carty is getting back into it.
    Imagine the ohhhs and ahhhs from the crowd with Binghams missed green and the black that rolled out.
    Great drama.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    Bingham finishing in style. Fergal will be happy enough looking on, tour card almost guaranteed now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,904 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Anyone who did not see Carty Bingham I recommend watching it. Was great stuff.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,904 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Bingham finishing in style. Fergal will be happy enough looking on, tour card almost guaranteed now.

    Oh jayus. I forgot about that and there I was shouting for Carty - shame on me! :o

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    Oh jayus. I forgot about that and there I was shouting for Carty - shame on me! :o

    I didnt wish him any ill at all, but he's had a great run, got his 2 year card so he'll be grand.

    I'm even wondering whether he could knock Fergal off as he's already got his tour place guaranteed, but it does seem to be the case. Jamie Clarke could also pass Fergal but would need to reach last 8 to do it. Unlikely, you'd think.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    Actually to clear up my confusion, i think Fergal was guaranteed his card anyway. Hard to see how he could be knocked off here and then not be in a position to attend q school which is ongoing at present.

    https://wpbsa.com/wst-statement-tour-qualification-2020-21/


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    This paragraph in above press release is interesting:

    "We can also confirm that any player who is able to retain their tour position through the one-year list and has qualified for the final stages of the World Championship, will earn their new card based upon their ranking position, not their Crucible qualification."

    So in effect, Ashley Carty earned a 2 year card by qualifying for the crucible. But, if he'd won today and then subsequently qualified via the one-year rankings, he'd merely earn his card for next season. On balance, if i was Carty, I'd be happy enough with how things worked out. Same goes for Jamie Clarke. Winning is great but would you prefer the security of the 2 year card? I know i would anyway.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,534 ✭✭✭Chalk McHugh


    Can't find any odds for a maximum in Paddys or Boyles. Used to be always a bet on that market.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    You could open an a/c on the exchange and bet it there if you fancy taking not much over even money.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,534 ✭✭✭Chalk McHugh


    You could open an a/c on the exchange and bet it there if you fancy taking not much over even money.

    I've never set up a betting account. Far too easy to bet and i'd be wary of abusing it. I guess i'm old school and like to head into a bookies, have a chat with some of the punters. Surprised their not offering it on their wwebsites though. I was hoping you would get 2/1 anyway seen as it hasn't been done at Sheffield in a long time but they dont give much away so probably a little over evens which is very poor odds.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,534 ✭✭✭Chalk McHugh


    Statistically for 147s at the Crucible really you should be getting 4/1 or more.

    There have been 10 maximums in 42 years. So 1/4. But none in 7 or 8 years.

    Im thinking law of averages and the best playing conditions you can get with all the top players and long frame matches.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,089 ✭✭✭Happy4all


    Can't find any odds for a maximum in Paddys or Boyles. Used to be always a bet on that market.

    Bet365 have it at 6/4.

    I'm sure if you went into a local shop they would quote you a price, probably the same 6/4.

    It would be too short to tempt me personally.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    I've never set up a betting account. Far too easy to bet and i'd be wary of abusing it. I guess i'm old school and like to head into a bookies, have a chat with some of the punters. Surprised their not offering it on their wwebsites though. I was hoping you would get 2/1 anyway seen as it hasn't been done at Sheffield in a long time but they dont give much away so probably a little over evens which is very poor odds.

    Wise man. Its about 11/10 on the exchange site and thats usually a bigger price than the conventional odds compilers. I guess in the circumstances people think its more likely this year but it doesnt look any value to my inexpert eyes anyway.

    I see a few people holding 20/1 dockets for a ton to be scored in every match. Thats more my kinda bet. Although i have done it a couple of times and one match always scuppers it and i remember getting much bigger odds than that.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,534 ✭✭✭Chalk McHugh


    Happy4all wrote: »
    Bet365 have it at 6/4.

    I'm sure if you went into a local shop they would quote you a price, probably the same 6/4.

    It would be too short to tempt me personally.

    Yea it's too short be fair.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,534 ✭✭✭Chalk McHugh


    Wise man. Its about 11/10 on the exchange site and thats usually a bigger price than the conventional odds compilers. I guess in the circumstances people think its more likely this year but it doesnt look any value to my inexpert eyes anyway.

    I see a few people holding 20/1 dockets for a ton to be scored in every match. Thats more my kinda bet. Although i have done it a couple of times and one match always scuppers it and i remember getting much bigger odds than that.

    Yea that sounds a nice wager. Like the look of that. Will keep an eye out for it.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    Yea that sounds a nice wager. Like the look of that. Will keep an eye out for it.

    Nice fun bet. Think it was 33/1 when i did it last year and fell 2 short. Just forgot about it this time, i think it might well cop.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,472 ✭✭✭Arthur Daley


    Forgot Matthew Stevens made a Crucible semi final as recently as 2012. For a player who has competed at the business end at the Crucible so many times he has drifted in the 20s and 30s of rankings for a long while now. He musn't have barely picked up ranking points away from Sheffield. Unfulfilled potential for sure.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,010 ✭✭✭velo.2010


    For anyone wondering who was on commentary this morning with Dennis Taylor, it was Dave Farrar, formerly of Eurosport football coverage back in the day. I thought I recognised his voice, though he is toning it down for the snooker. First non snooker player commenator since Clive Everton.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,472 ✭✭✭Arthur Daley


    I see the BBC are moving the live evening coverage to BBC 4 from BBC 2. Means little nowadays I suppose with a session on red button all the time and online. Will probably boost BBC 4 viewing figures at a time when it needs it. Daytime sessions would remain BBC2 apart from Saturdays.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,472 ✭✭✭Arthur Daley


    Yes no John Virgo on commentary this year. Think he is in Spain and keeping out of it.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    velo.2010 wrote: »
    For anyone wondering who was on commentary this morning with Dennis Taylor, it was Dave Farrar, formerly of Eurosport football coverage back in the day. I thought I recognised his voice, though he is toning it down for the snooker. First non snooker player commenator since Clive Everton.

    Must say never heard of the guy before. No harm to look outside the bubble every now and again i suppose. Though Clive was always a lifelong snooker man to be fair, journeyman pro, better at billiards.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,904 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Yes no John Virgo on commentary this year. Think he is in Spain and keeping out of it.

    Don't worry Ken has all his phrases learned off 'there you see it' 'as he would like' 'does (insert full name of player)'.

    Only one he does not use is 'wheres the cue ball going?' Too obvious!

    But Ken studiously follows the Dennis Taylor / John Virgo patter otherwise.

    Might break into the occasional 'in anyway' other than that - it is as if he feels he has to copy them. Maybe I am the only one who notices it but it annoys me. Use your own phrases and get your own style! :mad:

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,534 ✭✭✭Chalk McHugh


    Another top duel on here. Ding could be in trouble. King wont give up.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,023 ✭✭✭✭Joe_ Public


    Ding mixing the sublime with the ridiculous today. Nothing shocking about that, it's his career in microcosm pretty much. Dont know if he's winning this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,904 ✭✭✭✭gormdubhgorm


    Ding mixing the sublime with the ridiculous today. Nothing shocking about that, it's his career in microcosm pretty much. Dont know if he's winning this.

    Can't see it either would love to see him win it. Or failing that would like a new winner from the old guard McManus/Stevens that would be some story.

    Guff about stuff, and stuff about guff.



  • Advertisement
Advertisement