Gemma O'Doherty and her unicorns

Overheal · 10-07-2019 6:33pm

Now, I don't know how many Imams the animal rights group counts among its membership, but let me hazard a guess.
Maybe...ummm... None?

As long as we’re hazarding flippant guesses that add nothing to the discourse: I’ll say 72,578.

tuxy · 10-07-2019 6:34pm

recedite wrote: »

If its not Halal, then its Haram for a Muslim to consume it, unless there is a famine.

Correct Halal mean Lawful/Permitted, Haram means forbidden so it's either one or the other. There is no in between.

recedite · 10-07-2019 6:35pm

Overheal wrote: »

I’ll say 72,578.

42.

recedite · 10-07-2019 6:38pm

.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8190ziL5v-k

Overheal · 10-07-2019 6:38pm

Sure why not 42 million.

You are attempting to discredit AI’s ability as an animal rights group to interpret and convey what is and isn’t halal, but you present yourself as an armchair expert on the subject. I just find it odd. That’s all. I’m not sure what your accreditation is to discount theirs. I’m still also unclear what this has to do with bread.

Overheal · 10-07-2019 6:48pm

recedite wrote: »

So the ordinary Allah-fearing Muslims of Palestine, Jordan, Israel, Lebanon, Egypt and Turkey are being conned into eating meat that is Haram?
This is an outrage. You should contact the relevant governments and inform them.

You do of course realize there are both Sunni and Shia Muslims, often in proportion among the population of Muslim majority countries, that which also have populations that are not Muslim. It would be hence pretty narrow minded to assume all of their livestock practices follow one rule or another. Indeed, Ireland’s livestock practices are not 100% Catholic

recedite · 10-07-2019 7:25pm

Overheal wrote: »

I’m still also unclear what this has to do with bread.

Who said it had anything to do with bread?
Deliberately conflating the two just to get a cheap laugh is a bad joke that is getting a bit stale at this stage.

recedite · 10-07-2019 7:28pm

stale - at least my jokes are original.

Overheal · 10-07-2019 7:29pm

If you think so.

Infernal Racket · 10-07-2019 7:31pm

Gems has received another Youtube ban. She must be coming near the final ban at this stage

recedite · 10-07-2019 8:22pm

Gerry G wrote: »

Gems has received another Youtube ban. She must be coming near the final ban at this stage

More no-platforming. Silicon Valley tech firms have a clear bias against users on the right side of the political spectrum. As Mark says himself.

Blueshoe · 10-07-2019 8:26pm

recedite wrote: »

More no-platforming. Silicon Valley tech firms have a clear bias against users on the right side of the political spectrum. As Mark says himself.

All who's thoughts are judged to be too far to the right will be no platformed. Liberal social media companies are judge, jury and executioner.

A giant safe space echo chamber bubble will be formed but eventually it's occupants will virtue signal themselves into suffocation.

The Nal · 10-07-2019 8:59pm

Gerry G wrote: »

Gems has received another Youtube ban. She must be coming near the final ban at this stage

Shes spouting xenophobic trash and outright lies to attract thickos for her own profit every night. These people are too stupid top know better. A ban is probably a good idea.

Give her a megaphone and let her at it on Grafton St or wherever.

King Mob · 10-07-2019 11:46pm

recedite wrote: »

If its not Halal, then its Haram for a Muslim to consume it, unless there is a famine.

Red firstly I dont believe your interpretation of Muslim beliefs and law.
Previously you were moaning about an animal rights organisation being unqualified to make such statements.
Given you previous lie about halal practices, I think you are far far less trustworhty that them.

Once again you are bravely ignoring points you cannot address.
You lied about the content of the articles you posted.

King Mob · 10-07-2019 11:52pm

recedite wrote: »

More no-platforming. Silicon Valley tech firms have a clear bias against users on the right side of the political spectrum. As Mark says himself.

Oh no, now who will warn people about chemtrails and sinister muslim bread?!
Who will expose the next school shooting as a hoax?

recedite · 10-07-2019 11:59pm

King Mob wrote: »

Red firstly I dont believe your interpretation of Muslim beliefs and law.

Seek out an Imam and consult him. I see Al Quadri has his name on the Halal certs. He seems an approachable guy. You'll find him in the Blanchardstown mosque on Friday.
If western Muslims could lawfully (under sharia) eat meat from animals killed in the normal western way, why would they bother sourcing Halal meat?

Stephen15 · 11-07-2019 12:01am

Blueshoe wrote: »

All who's thoughts are judged to be too far to the right will be no platformed. Liberal social media companies are judge, jury and executioner.

A giant safe space echo chamber bubble will be formed but eventually it's occupants will virtue signal themselves into suffocation.

Good thing there's free speech platforms like Gab and Bitchute as an alternative form of social media. Also they're working on a platform that allows live streaming also.

King Mob · 11-07-2019 12:19am

recedite wrote: »

Seek out an Imam and consult him. I see Al Quadri has his name on the Halal certs. He seems an approachable guy. You'll find him in the Blanchardstown mosque on Friday.

Why would I do this?
You keep making these suggestions as if you think they are some kind of killing argument winner. They really aren't.

You again ignore the points in my post because you are unable to address them.

recedite wrote: »

If western Muslims could lawfully (under sharia) eat meat from animals killed in the normal western way, why would they bother sourcing Halal meat?

Why are you asking this question when it has nothing to do with the topic?
Why do you expect an answer when you've done nothing but dodge and avoid and ignore?

trixiebust · 11-07-2019 12:51am

The Nal wrote: »

Gerry G wrote: »

Gems has received another Youtube ban. She must be coming near the final ban at this stage

Shes spouting xenophobic trash and outright lies to attract thickos for her own profit every night. These people are too stupid top know better. A ban is probably a good idea.

Give her a megaphone and let her at it on Grafton St or wherever.

What ' outright lies & xenophobic trash' is she spouting?

King Mob · 11-07-2019 1:10am

trixiebust wrote: »

What ' outright lies & xenophobic trash' is she spouting?

For out right lies she is claiming that chemtrails exist, that some school shooting are goverment planned hoaxes and that the HPV vaccine ia dangerous.
She seems to latch onto a lot on conspiracy theories that grab attention.

trixiebust · 11-07-2019 2:25am

Chemtrails... wether they exist or not I don't care tbh.

That 'some' school shooting is as vague as it gets.

Her xenophobic stuff I presume is referring to asylum seekers? Most of who have no right to be here in the first place?

I think you are doing a lot of generalisation based on not a whole load of facts..

King Mob · 11-07-2019 2:39am

trixiebust wrote: »

Chemtrails... wether they exist or not I don't care tbh.

No, they dont exist. There isnt a vast international conspiracy to have airliners spraying an unknown chemical into the air every day all around the globe for some unknown reason.
Saying that they do exist is a lie if you have a lick of sense.
Saying that its an open question is just silly.

trixiebust wrote: »

that 'some' school shooting is as vague as it gets.

Whats vague about it?
Would you like me to dig up the tweet about it?

Also you missed her claims about vaccines.

trixiebust wrote: »

Her xenophobic stuff I presume is referring to asylum seekers? Most of who have no right to be here in the first place?

I think you are doing a lot of generalisation based on not a whole load of facts..

Lol.
Irony.

trixiebust · 11-07-2019 3:03am

I don't care about her or your opinions on chemtrails & wether they exist or not, couldn't give a sh1t about them.

You referenced 'some' school shooting. I actually have don't know what you are referring to, so I'll have to take your word on it.

Vaccines, again I don't care what her opinion on them is. I'm vaccinated, presume you were too & I'm not dead yet so let her have her opinion on it I say. Paid & elected politicians come up with far more outrageous stuff every day & actually get very well compensated for their stupid ideas.

I have watched numerous streams of her's & the three points above I can honestly say I have never heard her talk about.

I'm sure she has, but the way you are portraying it you would think that's all she speaks of.

She has some ideas I don't agree with tbh, but I believe she makes some very valid points, regarding corruption in Ireland & the amount of asylum seekers who have no right to be in the country in the first place.

King Mob · 11-07-2019 4:50am

trixiebust wrote: »

I don't care about her or your opinions on chemtrails & wether they exist or not, couldn't give a sh1t about them.

You referenced 'some' school shooting. I actually have don't know what you are referring to, so I'll have to take your word on it.

Vaccines, again I don't care what her opinion on them is. I'm vaccinated, presume you were too & I'm not dead yet so let her have her opinion on it I say. Paid & elected politicians come up with far more outrageous stuff every day & actually get very well compensated for their stupid ideas.

I have watched numerous streams of her's & the three points above I can honestly say I have never heard her talk about.

I'm sure she has, but the way you are portraying it you would think that's all she speaks of.

She has some ideas I don't agree with tbh, but I believe she makes some very valid points, regarding corruption in Ireland & the amount of asylum seekers who have no right to be in the country in the first place.

You asked for examples of her lies, I provided them.

I never said thats all she talks about or said or did anything that would br considered "portraying".
No idea where you are getting that from.

What I dont get is why you think her opinions on other topics are valid when she believes something as ridiculous as chemtrails.
It shows that either she's stupid enough to believe it for real, therefore demostrating a gullibility and lack of critical thinking skills.
Or she doesnt really believe it, but promotes it anyways, showing that shes willing to endorse abject nonsense fiction to gain attention and profit.

I would be wondering if she is the same with all her opinions...

ohnonotgmail · 11-07-2019 11:46am

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

SYL Given 9 months in the slammer, pity it wasn't 9 years.

not as long as i was hoping for. I wonder is that 9 months in addition to the time he has already served.

Timberrrrrrrr · 11-07-2019 12:04pm

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

not as long as i was hoping for. I wonder is that 9 months in addition to the time he has already served.

Says he'll be behind bars for just under 10 weeks.

Overheal · 11-07-2019 12:15pm

recedite wrote: »

More no-platforming. Silicon Valley tech firms have a clear bias against users on the right side of the political spectrum. As Mark says himself.

Some people don’t want certain bread; other people don’t want certain users on their platform.

Timberrrrrrrr · 11-07-2019 12:20pm

Overheal wrote: »

Some people don’t want certain bread; other people don’t want certain users on their platform.

Love how they call it "no platforming" no one is stopping them from setting up their own site ans spouting their shìte, they are jusy upset because the ones that generate the most clicks (and revenue for them) don't allow them to spew whatever bile they like.

They think a sites T&C's don't apply to them.

ohnonotgmail · 11-07-2019 12:24pm

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Says he'll be behind bars for just under 10 weeks.

a pity.

Timberrrrrrrr · 11-07-2019 12:26pm

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

a pity.

He's a gobshìte so it won't be long before he fùcks up and ends up back in front of a judge.

Repeat offenders gonna repeat.

Blueshoe · 11-07-2019 2:25pm

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

He's a gobshìte so it won't be long before he fùcks up and ends up back in front of a judge.

Repeat offenders gonna repeat.

Same with the groomers

Boxing.Fan · 11-07-2019 2:28pm

Blueshoe wrote: »

Same with the groomers

Timberrrr and the rest of the gang have shown time and time again that they are more interested seeing TR jailed than they are seeing paedos jailed. They certainly take more pleasure in seeing TR locked up than the paedos.

Very odd.

ohnonotgmail · 11-07-2019 2:40pm

Boxing.Fan wrote: »

Timberrrr and the rest of the gang have shown time and time again that they are more interested seeing TR jailed than they are seeing paedos jailed. They certainly take more pleasure in seeing TR locked up than the paedos.

Very odd.

i dont suppose you have any actual evidence to support that slur?

Timberrrrrrrr · 11-07-2019 2:41pm

Boxing.Fan wrote: »

Timberrrr and the rest of the gang have shown time and time again that they are more interested seeing TR jailed than they are seeing paedos jailed. They certainly take more pleasure in seeing TR locked up than the paedos.

Very odd.

Sigh....

TR had NOTHING to do with the grooming gangs getting caught/jailed....he did put their convictions at risk.with his stupid behaviour outside of the courts.

If you and the other SYL fanboys cannot understand this then i won't waste anymore time trying to explain it to you, if you don't understand by now then you never will.

Boxing.Fan · 11-07-2019 2:42pm

ohnonotgmail wrote: »

i dont suppose you have any actual evidence to support that slur?

You can point me to where you were all as obsessed about seeing paedos locked as you are about Tommy?

Yous dont care about the kids either, you are just happy to see him locked up.

ohnonotgmail · 11-07-2019 2:44pm

Boxing.Fan wrote: »

You can point me to where you were all as obsessed about seeing paedos locked as you are about Tommy?

Yous dont care about the kids either, you are just happy to see him locked up.

this is a thread about Gemma. I think you've got lost.

Overheal · 11-07-2019 2:45pm

Boxing.Fan banned 1 week for personal abuse.

Infernal Racket · 11-07-2019 6:38pm

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Sigh....

TR had NOTHING to do with the grooming gangs getting caught/jailed....he did put their convictions at risk.with his stupid behaviour outside of the courts.

If you and the other SYL fanboys cannot understand this then i won't waste anymore time trying to explain it to you, if you don't understand by now then you never will.

I'll never understand how people dont get this.

Overheal · 11-07-2019 9:04pm

Several posts have been deleted for backseat moderation.

Harvey Weinstein · 13-07-2019 9:40pm

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Sigh....

TR had NOTHING to do with the grooming gangs getting caught/jailed....he did put their convictions at risk.with his stupid behaviour outside of the courts.

If you and the other SYL fanboys cannot understand this then i won't waste anymore time trying to explain it to you, if you don't understand by now then you never will.

He had a big role in highlighting and putting a spotlight on the crimes of the Grooming gangs...when most of the media either ignored it or played down the severity of it.

Timberrrrrrrr · 13-07-2019 9:45pm

Harvey Weinstein wrote: »

He had a big role in highlighting and putting a spotlight on the crimes of the Grooming gangs...when most of the media either ignored it or played down the severity of it.

So we agree, SYL had nothing to do with exposing the grooming gangs, he just jumped on the bandwagon when the news broke.

Harvey Weinstein · 13-07-2019 10:02pm

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

So we agree, SYL had nothing to do with exposing the grooming gangs, he just jumped on the bandwagon when the news broke.

Of course he had a huge role in exposing the gangs. That doesn't mean his work directly resulted in any particular gang being arrested. But he (along with others) brought it to the attention of the public, when the 'official' media largely ignored it. This was important.
I remember an article in the Guardian back in the late 2000's (which I believed at the time) saying that the allegations about the gangs were based in "plain and simple racism" or something to that effect. TR\SYL was an important counterbalance to that kind of whitewashing.
I don't really give a f*ck about the guy, his motives are suspicious and he's obviously being funded by someone..who?
But he played an important part in bringing the crimes of these gangs to the attention of the public.

Overheal · 13-07-2019 11:05pm

Timberrrrrrrr wrote: »

Love how they call it "no platforming" no one is stopping them from setting up their own site ans spouting their shìte, they are jusy upset because the ones that generate the most clicks (and revenue for them) don't allow them to spew whatever bile they like.

They think a sites T&C's don't apply to them.

It implies they can't source their own platform, when in reality someone just decided their platform is not for them.

AndrewJRenko · 14-07-2019 11:05am

Stephen15 wrote: »

Good thing there's free speech platforms like Gab and Bitchute as an alternative form of social media. Also they're working on a platform that allows live streaming also.

They don't want 'social media'. They want ad revenue and income. See how far they get without out.

Blueshoe wrote: »

Same with the groomers

Boxing.Fan wrote: »

Timberrrr and the rest of the gang have shown time and time again that they are more interested seeing TR jailed than they are seeing paedos jailed. They certainly take more pleasure in seeing TR locked up than the paedos.

Very odd.

Harvey Weinstein wrote: »

He had a big role in highlighting and putting a spotlight on the crimes of the Grooming gangs...when most of the media either ignored it or played down the severity of it.

Just bit of a shame that SYL has done nothing about the groomers on his own side. Perhaps dealing with groomers isn't a top priority after all, and is just a tactic to get the knuckle-draggers on his side?
https://politicsandinsights.org/2018/05/29/the-edl-have-paedophiles-in-their-ranks-but-tommy-robinson-evidently-doesnt-condemn-them/

The Nal · 14-07-2019 11:59am

THREATS, LIES, AND YOUTUBE LINKS: GEMMA O’DOHERTY AND THE FAR RIGHT

Dr. Bre · 14-07-2019 12:01pm

Nice blue sky out today - no chemtrails Gemma !

alaimacerc · 15-07-2019 6:01pm

The Nal wrote: »

THREATS, LIES, AND YOUTUBE LINKS: GEMMA O’DOHERTY AND THE FAR RIGHT

Couple of Gemmonian-grade comments on that very article, I see. Not so much the bottom half of the internet, as the very worst percentile.

Infernal Racket · 15-07-2019 6:40pm

Dr. Bre wrote: »

Nice blue sky out today - no chemtrails Gemma !

Pilots must have had a day off

Infernal Racket · 16-07-2019 8:37pm

She is outside Google now after staging a major protest (3 people holding a banner) because Google suspended her channel. It's hilarious stuff. I'm thinking of heading down there with a small bucket of popcorn

The Nal · 16-07-2019 9:44pm

Lads, the pic of her "supporters".

This is performance art right?

Right?!

https://twitter.com/gemmaod1/status/1151200917724782599?s=19

Gemma O'Doherty and her unicorns

Comments