Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

GRO Records

18911131417

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,777 ✭✭✭BowWow


    Any news on the 1917 Births, 1942 Marriages and 1967 Deaths etc.?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,149 ✭✭✭✭josip


    BowWow wrote: »
    Any news on the 1917 Births, 1942 Marriages and 1967 Deaths etc.?

    Are these the only records outstanding now?
    I though there were some of the earlier deaths and marriages also awaiting processing?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,943 ✭✭✭tabbey


    josip wrote: »
    Are these the only records outstanding now?
    I though there were some of the earlier deaths and marriages also awaiting processing?

    The Early marriages and deaths have been digitised by the GRO, but IrishGenealogy still declines to put them online.
    Furthermore they refuse to give any date for when they will be online, or whether they will be done in phases.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,672 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    Actually, my understanding is that they are working on the outstanding earlier deaths and marriages first. That was from Tadhg (who runs the site) the last time I talked to him before Christmas.

    Do you have further knowledge, Tabbey?

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,943 ✭✭✭tabbey


    pinkypinky wrote: »
    Actually, my understanding is that they are working on the outstanding earlier deaths and marriages first. That was from Tadhg (who runs the site) the last time I talked to him before Christmas.

    Do you have further knowledge, Tabbey?

    I was advised in the GRO that all the deaths and marriages back to 1864 (and some earlier non RC marriages) were digitised by the GRO and sent to irishgenealogy for going online to the public.
    Presumably IG has some legal or technical reasons for still not making them available.
    I emailed them some time ago, they replied in the most vague terms that they would be online some time. When I sought clarification, such as when? and all at once or in batches?, the reply was non-informative, just that we would be informed when they are ready.

    As the work was mostly done by the GRO, I can only speculate why these records which are supposed to be freely available, are still restricted to those who purchase a copy from the GRO.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,149 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Can anyone remember specifically which of the early years are outstanding for deaths and marriages?
    I think all the births are there?

    Does anyone have an email address for Irish Genealogy?
    I want to cc Heather Humphreys and the GRO at the same time (heather.humphreys@oir.ie, gro@groireland.ie)

    Perhaps if a few of us here emailed at the same time and made it obvious that we weren't going to let it go, there would be some movement?


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,421 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


    It's not Heather Humphries anymore as far as I know.

    Google tells me it's Josepha Madigan in Culture, Heritage and the Gaeltacht now.

    Marriages before 1871 and deaths before 1881 are missing to the best of my knowledge.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,108 ✭✭✭Jellybaby1


    I often come across that word.....'missing'. How and why do files go missing in this country? It tends to happen quite a bit. :mad: Other than the burning of records in 1922.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,672 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    Josepha Madigan is the current minister.

    No one is paying attention to genealogy stuff right now. While I'm all for reminding ministers of obligations, an email like this will fall through the cracks of the referendum correspondence.

    I've emailed my contact to ask - he doesn't always reply though!

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,421 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


    Jellybaby1 wrote: »
    I often come across that word.....'missing'. How and why do files go missing in this country? It tends to happen quite a bit. :mad: Other than the burning of records in 1922.

    Perhaps a poor choice of word on my part as they weren't there to begin with.:)

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,943 ✭✭✭tabbey


    Jellybaby1 wrote: »
    I often come across that word.....'missing'. How and why do files go missing in this country? It tends to happen quite a bit. :mad: Other than the burning of records in 1922.

    They are not missing, we can buy the record copy if we wish.

    They just have not been put free online yet.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,421 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


    Not missing but absent from the website nonetheless.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,108 ✭✭✭Jellybaby1


    Sorry guys, missing records just makes me grumpy. Apologies.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,421 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


    I share your frustration - wish they'd just get on with the job and finish it in good time.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,149 ✭✭✭✭josip


    I've sent the email politely expressing my frustration this morning to

    josepha.madigan@oireachtas.ie
    gro@groireland.ie
    feedback@irishgenealogy.ie

    and cc-ed my local TDs.
    I don't expect much to come of it if mine is the only email they receive.

    A friend who works as a TD's helper says that most of the communication they receive concern individual issues and receive a boiler plate reply.
    If they receive more than 3 comms about the same issue they take note.
    More than 10 comms about an issue will usually result in meaningful inquiries being made, since more votes may be influenced as a result.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,672 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    I had a response from my contact this morning but it didn't say anything useful beyond some time in 2018 and they will promote through the website when they do.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,149 ✭✭✭✭josip


    pinkypinky wrote: »
    I had a response from my contact this morning but it didn't say anything useful beyond some time in 2018 and they will promote through the website when they do.

    The mail I replied to/cc-ed this morning was from May 2017 and they said 'soon'. :(
    Can some other posters also email the Dept/GRO?
    Even if only 3 or 4 send, it's more than just one or 2 of us.
    I doubt whether the Dept/GRO follow this thread.
    Tx.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,149 ✭✭✭✭josip


    I have received an explanation from GRO about why it's taking a long time.
    It provides more details than the boiler plate responses I've received up to now and I appreciate the extra time it took to send.
    To try and explain why it takes this amount of time is a little more difficult. Essentially the GRO have been operating from two forms of database. One has most of the data now in the format that you see online. The remainder are still linked to the old Index information without the image linking directly. That is why the information you see shows the Returns Year; Returns Quarter; Returns Volume No & Returns Page No. You will also note that each Marriage entry only shows one party and does not include the date of marriage. Since 2016 work on the Deaths Indexes has moved the corrected format from 1921 down to 1878 and for Marriages from 1882 to 1870. These updated indexes also have the image of the register entry linked to them. The final body of work does take time but we need to ensure that accuracy is not lost in completing this work and we will ensure that the addition of these remaining records is highlighted on the website in good time.

    We trust that visitors to the website will understand this and will of course be delighted when the remaining records are launched in the near future.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,421 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


    Thanks for making the inquiry josip and for posting their response.

    It explains the work involved which they then disappointingly use as an excuse for the delay in delivering the completed project.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,777 ✭✭✭BowWow


    Yes, thanks for asking and posting the reply.

    However whilst the reply helps with the "older" records it doesn't explain the non-show of the 1917 Births, the 1942 Marriages and the 1967 Deaths. Or am I missing something?


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,672 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    They've always said they're focusing on the older stuff first.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,288 ✭✭✭mickmackey1


    pinkypinky wrote: »
    They've always said they're focusing on the older stuff first.
    Except the newer stuff is ready at the flick of a switch, as we know from the few days it was online. Luckily I managed to download dozens of pages :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,943 ✭✭✭tabbey


    Hermy wrote: »
    Thanks for making the inquiry josip and for posting their response.

    It explains the work involved which they then disappointingly use as an excuse for the delay in delivering the completed project.

    But it does not explain why irishgenealogy.ie have not made available the data which the GRO has already given them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,149 ✭✭✭✭josip


    tabbey wrote: »
    But it does not explain why irishgenealogy.ie have not made available the data which the GRO has already given them.


    Which records are you referring to?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,943 ✭✭✭tabbey


    josip wrote: »
    Which records are you referring to?

    The early marriages and deaths, which have been digitised by the GRO and sent to irishgenealogy.ie for inclusion on the website.

    Irishgenealogy has been sitting on them and are very vague as to when we will have them free online.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,672 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    You have to realise that irishgenealogy is literally run by one guy and it's not his only job. We'll get it when we get it.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,108 ✭✭✭Jellybaby1


    pinkypinky wrote: »
    You have to realise that irishgenealogy is literally run by one guy and it's not his only job. We'll get it when we get it.


    That's quite impressive. Though there are several people here including me, who might be happy to volunteer to help him out! :)


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,672 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    Oh me too! Sure let's all apply for the civil service, pass the exams, wait for a job opening in the right department, explain our skill set, and they'll probably put us working in marine conservation or the Mexican consular team!

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,149 ✭✭✭✭josip


    tabbey wrote: »
    The early marriages and deaths, which have been digitised by the GRO and sent to irishgenealogy.ie for inclusion on the website.

    Irishgenealogy has been sitting on them and are very vague as to when we will have them free online.


    Tabbey,do you mean all the deaths before 1878 and marriages before 1870 have already been digitized by the GRO and sent to Irish genealogy or just a subset of these?
    Is this public knowledge?
    If so, I will revert to the GRO.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,943 ✭✭✭tabbey


    josip wrote: »
    Tabbey,do you mean all the deaths before 1878 and marriages before 1870 have already been digitized by the GRO and sent to Irish genealogy or just a subset of these?
    Is this public knowledge?
    If so, I will revert to the GRO.

    My understanding is that all marriages and deaths back to 1864, and some of the pre 1864 non RC marriages have been digitised by the GRO and sent to irishgenealogy.ie for going online.

    What work if any, has to be done for putting the records online, I have no idea.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 403 ✭✭kanadams123


    Hi, does anyone know roughly how long it takes for the GRO to send emails of photocopy requests?
    I have already paid via the secure online link a few days ago and just wondering how long it would take to get them through email?!!


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 27,263 CMod ✭✭✭✭spurious


    Hi, does anyone know roughly how long it takes for the GRO to send emails of photocopy requests?
    I have already paid via the secure online link a few days ago and just wondering how long it would take to get them through email?!!

    Some I have had back within three or four days. My last one took a bit longer. I was actually wondering had they received the letter when I got a reply. It took about 2 weeks from me sending it.


  • Registered Users Posts: 192 ✭✭JDERIC2017


    I ordered a death cert on the 2nd July and only got it today!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 403 ✭✭kanadams123


    Ah i see! Ill have another few days at lest so before i get anything! Thanks!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,777 ✭✭✭BowWow


    Any time I see new posts in this thread, my heart misses a beat...:(


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 403 ✭✭kanadams123


    BowWow wrote: »
    Any time I see new posts in this thread, my heart misses a beat...:(

    Haha..so sorry! Tbh i am the same, everytime i think "oh the 1917 births are available"
    I just didnt think my querry was worth a whole thread by itself!
    Sorry BowWow :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,777 ✭✭✭BowWow


    Haha..so sorry! Tbh i am the same, everytime i think "oh the 1917 births are available"
    I just didnt think my querry was worth a whole thread by itself!
    Sorry BowWow :)


    Absolutely no problem :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 407 ✭✭VirginiaB


    Funny you should ask. I recently sent for a GRO record for the first time, pd online.  It took 14 days for the photocopy to arrive by email which is fine compared to snail mail.  Very smooth process and very clear image of an 1865 death record.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,672 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    Interested to know what secure link you used online to pay?

    I have access to a fax machine so I still fax my orders and ask for them to be emailed.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 403 ✭✭kanadams123


    pinkypinky wrote: »
    Interested to know what secure link you used online to pay?

    I have access to a fax machine so I still fax my orders and ask for them to be emailed.

    I sent the filled out form (which i got from irishgeneology.ie) to the gro payments email address and they sent a secure link to make the 4euro payment.
    The instructions are included on the request form which i got from irishgeneology.ie.

    The payment was done through the typical WorldPay service which is typicaly used for many online purchases!

    As it was my first time getting these records this way, i used my smart card ( three money card) to be safe opposed to debit/credit. I am always carefull with these links and it was legit!


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,421 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


    VirginiaB wrote: »
    ...It took 14 days for the photocopy to arrive by email which is fine...

    You think fourteen days to send an email is okay? :eek::eek:

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 407 ✭✭VirginiaB


    Yes, I think 14 days was fine, considering the alternative.  And considering the man died in 1865--what's two more weeks? Seriously, there is more than just sending an email involved.
    I used the same secure pay link as kanadams123, no problems.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,421 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


    VirginiaB wrote: »
    Seriously, there is more than just sending an email involved.

    Not having a go at you VirginiaB but two weeks to send a pdf by email is ridiculous - it's five minutes work, if even that.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 27,263 CMod ✭✭✭✭spurious


    Hermy wrote: »
    Not having a go at you VirginiaB but two weeks to send a pdf by email is ridiculous - it's five minutes work, if even that.

    Do they have pdfs ready to go? I thought it was like in Werburgh Street, where someone went rooted out the big books, photocopied it and then emailed it?
    I know it still could take you or me a few minutes, but I'm guessing this is another job has been tacked on to someone's responsibilities.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 74 ✭✭Diaell


    Hermy wrote: »
    Not having a go at you VirginiaB but two weeks to send a pdf by email is ridiculous - it's five minutes work, if even that.

    Also they prob have an awful lot of these five minutes jobs to do. Its better than having to pay massive money like in some countries for records. They are trying to get all the older ones digitized so they can be access free online, I'm sure this is where the majority of their time is spent.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,421 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


    spurious wrote: »
    Do they have pdfs ready to go? I thought it was like in Werburgh Street, where someone went rooted out the big books, photocopied it and then emailed it?
    I know it still could take you or me a few minutes, but I'm guessing this is another job has been tacked on to someone's responsibilities.
    A while back I visited a local office looking for a recent cert and I was able to see the computer screen as the lady searched for the record. It turned out the death I was looking for took place in England so it wasn't to be found. But the lady was very methodical about searching the specific area, and then the wider area and finally all of Ireland, explaining to me as she went along what she was doing. I then asked for another cert which she quickly found and printed off straight away.
    All told I was dealing with her for about ten minutes.

    Now I appreciate head office is probably inundated with requests for certs but it's a simple process, not unlike the one we follow when using the Irish Genealogy website, so I don't think it needs two weeks lead time.
    Diaell wrote: »
    Also they prob have an awful lot of these five minutes jobs to do. Its better than having to pay massive money like in some countries for records. They are trying to get all the older ones digitized so they can be access free online, I'm sure this is where the majority of their time is spent.
    As someone once said to me in a most uncomplimentary manner "I bet they're trying really hard!"

    There's no doubt that in the main researching family trees in Ireland is an absolute joy given the level of free [and mostly unfettered] access we have to historical records. But I look at the GRO and the way they do things and I just feel they could do so much better.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,149 ✭✭✭✭josip


    Diaell wrote: »
    They are trying to get all the older ones digitized so they can be access free online, I'm sure this is where the majority of their time is spent.


    Are you new here Diaell? :)

    They're certainly spending a lot of their time on it, but none of us have any idea why it's taking so long for the remainder.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 6,672 Mod ✭✭✭✭pinkypinky


    They have had everything scanned for at least 8 years now. When you order in the GRO in person, they print it off from a pc. It's a very long time since they photocopied from the books and chopped the headers together with your relevant line.

    I think we are justified to gripe about the time it takes them to produce a pdf (I would leverage similar complaints to the UK GRO too though) and the time it's taking to get the older records (plus the 2017 release) ready. 14 days to email a pdf is totally unacceptable. If I'm waiting more than a few working days, I ring them, and then it always miraculously appears in my inbox after lunch.

    However, since we're getting it all for free, we can't gripe too much.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 11,421 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hermy


    pinkypinky wrote: »
    However, since we're getting it all for free, we can't gripe too much.

    Free in this case means paid for by our taxes.
    Money well spent but money nonetheless.

    Genealogy Forum Mod



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 407 ✭✭VirginiaB


    No offense taken, Hermy.  The older records aren't free and to us overseas, it's a great service, despite the wait.  And yes, I join everyone in wishing other records would come online for instant access. It is frustrating. But when I compare the availability of records from when I started all this, it's a miracle.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement