Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Which Camera? **Please read OP first**

1171820222336

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 943 ✭✭✭bbsrs


    Hi all ,

    I'm looking for a compact that would be good for video and as a regular point and shoot camera but needs to be compact .sub €500 , not bothered about GPS or WIFI or social media connectivity . Any suggestions?

    Sony RX100 for €479 ? Panasonic TZ60 €377 ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,532 ✭✭✭JohnBoy26


    Ah, yep, it can be a nightmare. :D DSLRs are a different kettle altogether.

    MP is no indication of quality. As above, optical zoom is generally better than digital. I wouldn't worry too much about battery as some modern rechargeable AAs or AAAs are excellent.

    Snapsort is great for comparing side-by-side, and should make a decision easier -

    http://snapsort.com/compare/Canon-PowerShot-SX510-HS-vs-Nikon-Coolpix-L830

    I'd be skeptical about some their comparisons. Just for the fun of it I done a comparison of 2 cameras I have, A Samsung wb200f point and shoot and the mirrorless canon eos m.

    In reality the eos m is a far superior camera but these guys have the wb200f as the winner :eek:

    http://snapsort.com/compare/Canon-EOS-M-vs-Samsung-WB200F


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 138 ✭✭Alltherage


    Looking at the scoring the Samsung is picking up points for the lens where the canon is rated as body only, that's what caused that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 55 ✭✭Kas2010


    HI can anybody recommend a decent starter camera for a girl age 12 who is interested in vivid photography please? € 200 is the limit


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 9,047 CMod ✭✭✭✭CabanSail


    Kas2010 wrote: »
    HI can anybody recommend a decent starter camera for a girl age 12 who is interested in vivid photography please? € 200 is the limit


    I am not sure what you mean by "vivid photography"?

    How well does she use a computer and does she have access to image editing software?

    Is she careful with equipment or, like many that age, a bit accident prone?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,320 ✭✭✭roast


    Hey everyone,

    While I've been using a borrowed EOS1000D for the last couple of months, I'm more or less a noob when it comes to photography.
    I'm looking for a few suggestions on what to buy.

    I'm looking for a beginner to intermediate DSLR, as opposed to a compact/fixed chassis - I'd like to have the option of using different lenses in the future.
    My budget would be ~€500, including a lens/SD card, whether it's a kit or not.
    Complexity or user-friendliness isn't really an issue.
    The main thing I'm looking for is something that will also be able to record 1080p video at 60fps which also has an external mic input.
    Noise suppression isn't an issue as I'll be using an external mic.

    So far, the Nikon D3300 seems tick all the boxes. The only downside I see with this model for me is that the video mode runs for a max of 10mins on High Quality, or 20mins on Normal Quality. I'd prefer something that could continue capturing indefinitely, or at least until the SD card is full. Though I realize I might end up stretching outside my budget.
    The next on the list would be the D5200 - but of course this only captures at 1080i 60fps - not ideal. Or would I really notice much of a difference in video output between the D3300 and the D5200?

    Sorry for the long post - thanks in advance for any suggestions. :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,110 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    A secondhand Panasonic GH2 then hack the firmware to get unlimited recording time.

    Nearly all DSLR style cameras imported to Europe are limited to 30min recoding time because of tax issues.


  • Registered Users Posts: 410 ✭✭CK73


    Does anyone have any experience with mirrorless cameras? I'm thinking of investing in one and although I know they do have limitations with regards to macro and speed photography, they do seem to be brilliant in every other way and possibly the future in photography.

    I'm also not sure if it would be better to go for fuji or olympus?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 774 ✭✭✭CarpeDiem85


    I have a Sony RX 100 ii and it takes amazing photos, very clear and precise. Some of the best I've seen. I wouldn't have a great knowledge of cameras and specs but I don't think you need to with this camera. It does all the work for you. It's great that you can just throw it into your bag and off you go. Big thumbs up from me.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,285 ✭✭✭Mike Litoris


    CK73 wrote: »
    Does anyone have any experience with mirrorless cameras? I'm thinking of investing in one and although I know they do have limitations with regards to macro and speed photography, they do seem to be brilliant in every other way and possibly the future in photography.

    I'm also not sure if it would be better to go for fuji or olympus?

    I've only experience with m4/3. The only advantage was size. It lacked everywhere else compared to a DSLR.


  • Registered Users Posts: 410 ✭✭CK73


    I've only experience with m4/3. The only advantage was size. It lacked everywhere else compared to a DSLR.

    Really? That is very disappointing to hear. I was hoping to hear differently.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,285 ✭✭✭Mike Litoris


    CK73 wrote: »
    Really? That is very disappointing to hear. I was hoping to hear differently.

    I've an Oly EPL3. I'm not sure if the tech has advanced much but from what I remember it is inherent in their design due to the smaller sensor size and distance from the lense amongst other things.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,110 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    CK73 wrote: »
    Does anyone have any experience with mirrorless cameras? I'm thinking of investing in one and although I know they do have limitations with regards to macro and speed photography, they do seem to be brilliant in every other way and possibly the future in photography.

    I'm also not sure if it would be better to go for fuji or olympus?

    Theses days the top M4/3 cameras are well able to focus on most moving subjects. Not quite as good as top end DSLRs, but still very capable.

    M4/3 have no disadvantage in terms of macro, in fact they have an advantage as the format has an inherently greater depth of field.

    I personally use an Olympus and wouldn't know much about the Fuji. The OM-D range of cameras have superb image stabilisation capabilities allowing you to get good hand-held shots in low lighting when normally you might expect a blurred image due to camera shake.

    If you use the studio shot comparison tool at Dpreview.com, you can readily compare the image quality afforded by different cameras. Comparing any OM-D with any DSLR will show very little image quality difference at all but the most extreme ISO settings.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,110 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    I've an Oly EPL3. I'm not sure if the tech has advanced much but from what I remember it is inherent in their design due to the smaller sensor size and distance from the lense amongst other things.

    The EPL3 was introduced mid 2011. The newer models have improved sensors and image processing.


  • Registered Users Posts: 472 ✭✭sleepysniper


    Looking on eGlobalCentral I was about to buy the Canon 700D but then i spotted the Nikon D3200/D3300. It would appear that the Nikon seems to be a slightly better camera in terms of image quality? It also shoots 1080p @ 60FPS.

    I want a Canon and the articulated LCD screen would be handy, but the spec and price of the Nikon are also very appealing.

    I can't decide which to go for - please help!

    This will be my first DSLR by the way.

    Canon 700D

    Nikon D3300


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 559 ✭✭✭sebphoto


    Looking on eGlobalCentral I was about to buy the Canon 700D but then i spotted the Nikon D3200/D3300. It would appear that the Nikon seems to be a slightly better camera in terms of image quality? It also shoots 1080p @ 60FPS.

    I want a Canon and the articulated LCD screen would be handy, but the spec and price of the Nikon are also very appealing.

    I can't decide which to go for - please help!

    This will be my first DSLR by the way.

    Canon 700D

    Nikon D3300

    You better ask yourself what lenses are you going to buy at the very beginning.
    This way you will know what system you should select.
    By the way, kit lens is not worth consideration as you'll get rid of it pretty soon if you're seriously interested in photography.


  • Registered Users Posts: 472 ✭✭sleepysniper


    sebphoto wrote: »
    You better ask yourself what lenses are you going to buy at the very beginning.
    This way you will know what system you should select.
    By the way, kit lens is not worth consideration as you'll get rid of it pretty soon if you're seriously interested in photography.

    Thanks for the reply.

    I would have been under the impression that both Canon and Nikon would both have the equivalent lenses that I may require? Is there a big difference between their lenses?

    For example; from reading the FAQ section I will get the "nifty fifity" lense and a 70-300mm lense - will this have a bearing over getting the Nikon or the Canon?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 559 ✭✭✭sebphoto


    Thanks for the reply.

    I would have been under the impression that both Canon and Nikon would both have the equivalent lenses that I may require? Is there a big difference between their lenses?

    For example; from reading the FAQ section I will get the "nifty fifity" lense and a 70-300mm lense - will this have a bearing over getting the Nikon or the Canon?

    I meant to say that if you decide to get pro Nikkor lenses then your entire system would be Nikon.
    In terms of differences between say 70-200 2.8 Canon and Nikon, first is the price:
    Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 70-200mm f/2.8G ED VR II = $2397, Canon EF 70-200mm f/2.8L IS II USM = $2200. Nikkor 50mm f/1.4 = $420, Canon 50mm f/1.4 = $400, but Canon also have 50mm f/1.2, however it's different story.

    Second, image quality and lens quality, but these things are subjective and depends from personal preferences.

    Third, customer service.

    In my opinion you have to think about your requirements - what camera you need exactly and then make decision.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,799 ✭✭✭runswithascript


    Can anyone please recommend a starter camera and a course for a child that likes to take pictures of nature etc?

    She is 13.


  • Registered Users Posts: 379 ✭✭_DMac_


    Hi folks.

    Just wondering can anyone recommend a nice beginner dlsr don't wanna spend too much off the bat so wanna keep it under €200. I don't mind going second hand for first camera to see if I have a feel/nack for it.

    If I find myself getting into it I can upgrade during the year. Would prefer Nikon as I have access to a Nikon lens if needs be.

    Thanks


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,060 ✭✭✭Kenny Logins


    _DMac_ wrote: »
    Hi folks.

    Just wondering can anyone recommend a nice beginner dlsr don't wanna spend too much off the bat so wanna keep it under €200. I don't mind going second hand for first camera to see if I have a feel/nack for it.

    If I find myself getting into it I can upgrade during the year. Would prefer Nikon as I have access to a Nikon lens if needs be.

    Thanks

    If they're older lenses, look for a D70, if not a D5100.


  • Registered Users Posts: 379 ✭✭_DMac_


    If they're older lenses, look for a D70, if not a D5100.

    Thanks. I probably should clarify that I would prefer a lens included if possible but can borrow one if I need to but would ideally have my own incase something happens to borrowed one.

    Thanks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,060 ✭✭✭Kenny Logins


    The Nikon 18-70 is a decent lens for around €100, and often comes with the D70.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 768 ✭✭✭choons


    Hey folks, investigating new cameras and have a few questions.

    Current camera is a Sony A230 DSLR and have taken 15,000 shots. Not a pro but have the basics, don't have extra lenses and probably looking at Canon or Nikon DSLRs. I want more pixels, good video, live view and some extra features and controls to challenge me.

    1. Have entry level DSLRs improved in the last 5 years or would another entry level be a waste?
    2. Second hand or newer model? Has anyone bought an older midrange instead of new entry level?
    3. Budget is TBC. What do I have to spend to see a nice improvement?

    Nikon D5300 is topping the list at the moment! Thanks


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,110 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    dusf wrote: »
    Can anyone please recommend a starter camera and a course for a child that likes to take pictures of nature etc?

    She is 13.

    Olympus XZ-2 might serve the purpose. If by 'nature' you are envisioning frame filling shots of wildlife taken from a distance then that isn't a realistic aim as the equipment to achieve those sorts of images costs in the thousands.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,466 ✭✭✭Ryath


    Been lurking in here and doing a lot of research the last month trying to decide on my first dslr. Brother has a 600d and it's made me realise the limitations of my 5 year old Samsung compact. Budget is tight though €400-500 would prefer to keep to the lower end.

    Usual suspects Nikon 3200 or Canon eos 100d. Oddball choice is the Sony SLT A58 or the Pentax K50. Will be mostly for pictures of my kids so a 35 or 50mm prime would be perfect most of the time. Looking at pricing though usually as well to get the 18-55 kit lens as it usually only costs an extra 50 though I can live with out it if I can get the body cheap enough.

    Other use would for cycle races so really am looking at a fairly fast zoom 55-200 lens which is probably outside my budget and I'll pick up later in the year.

    From looking Nikons seem much cheaper online than the Dublin stores but the prices for cannon are much closer. A 100d in cons is €549 with a 8gb card and a bag thrown in. It's €485 on amazon with no card or bag.

    Cons had Sony A58 with the 18-55 and 50mm prime last week for €479 which was very tempting. Not listed anymore though. Jessops in belfast have it with 3 lens kit with a 55-200 lens for €532. Wary of going with sony will it cost more in the long run? Lenses and flashes are dearer.

    The pentax tempts me as it's weather resistant bit over budget but lenses are a bit cheaper. From everything I've read image quality is not quite as good as cannon or nikon.

    Going to go have a look around the Dublin shops today and see what I like. I'm still confused by choice between canon and nikon and this article made it worse :confused:http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/nikon-vs-canon.htm

    Buying online I'd probably go with the nikon as the savings are substantial. With canon though the shops are much closer and most are throwing in 8gb card and case and some a day or half days training which would be nice. I'm hoping instore there would be some leeway for a discount or a bit extra off getting a backpack or sling bag.

    Sorry for the rambling post just trying to get it clear in my head.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,128 ✭✭✭Ben D Bus


    If your brother has a Canon, might it be worth considering the possibility of swapping/borrowing/sharing lenses with him? So choosing Canon might give you access to more lenses?

    Have you held the different cameras in your hand? How they feel really does make a difference to how you will enjoy photography. Nikon works better for me in that respect. But others would prefer Canon or another brand.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,747 ✭✭✭Bluefoam


    Pentax is a very good choice, but Canon and Nikon are the most popular... The weatherproofing would be a huge selling point for me... Image quality is equal to Nikanon but some video functions may not be as advanced. Lenses are generally good... But harder to swap because there are less users...

    Pentax users are generally a happy bunch knowing they made a very good choice that others aren't too aware of...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 138 ✭✭Alltherage


    The 600d looks to be in the same price range as the 100d, I found the 100d a bit small when I had one in my hands in the store don't know if that's just it feeling unfamilar, touch screen might be interesting and if you were doing live view focusing shooting vid then the hybrid af should be better. Both worth considering if hear share is an option with your brother.

    The 3200 is probably better value looking at the prices, the only negative experience I had with one was having it refuse to shoot when set to rear button focus unless it thought it was in focus. Couldn't find any setting for that either. So apart from having pushed me to anger with some of it's design decisions it's probably the more capable camera image wise.

    I've heard some bad things about the A58 but in truth I've heard them from photographers who seem to really not like Sony. So if you get the opportunity to try one out give it a go. Hell report back I'd be interested to get an opinion from somebody who's not spending the weekend burning crosses outside Sonys corporate HQ.

    Going to go with bluefoam on the pentax, if you're looking for weather sealing then that's the decision made becasue you wont find it on your other options. hold out for a little bit canons 750/760 are supposed to be officially announced tomorrow that might send do favourable things to the pricing on the older bodies. Never enough that you'll feel like you've caught a bargain mind.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,466 ✭✭✭mayo.mick


    Ryath wrote: »
    Been lurking in here and doing a lot of research the last month trying to decide on my first dslr. Brother has a 600d and it's made me realise the limitations of my 5 year old Samsung compact. Budget is tight though €400-500 would prefer to keep to the lower end.

    Usual suspects Nikon 3200 or Canon eos 100d. Oddball choice is the Sony SLT A58 or the Pentax K50. Will be mostly for pictures of my kids so a 35 or 50mm prime would be perfect most of the time. Looking at pricing though usually as well to get the 18-55 kit lens as it usually only costs an extra 50 though I can live with out it if I can get the body cheap enough.

    Other use would for cycle races so really am looking at a fairly fast zoom 55-200 lens which is probably outside my budget and I'll pick up later in the year.

    From looking Nikons seem much cheaper online than the Dublin stores but the prices for cannon are much closer. A 100d in cons is €549 with a 8gb card and a bag thrown in. It's €485 on amazon with no card or bag.

    Cons had Sony A58 with the 18-55 and 50mm prime last week for €479 which was very tempting. Not listed anymore though. Jessops in belfast have it with 3 lens kit with a 55-200 lens for €532. Wary of going with sony will it cost more in the long run? Lenses and flashes are dearer.

    The pentax tempts me as it's weather resistant bit over budget but lenses are a bit cheaper. From everything I've read image quality is not quite as good as cannon or nikon.

    Going to go have a look around the Dublin shops today and see what I like. I'm still confused by choice between canon and nikon and this article made it worse :confused:http://www.kenrockwell.com/tech/nikon-vs-canon.htm

    Buying online I'd probably go with the nikon as the savings are substantial. With canon though the shops are much closer and most are throwing in 8gb card and case and some a day or half days training which would be nice. I'm hoping instore there would be some leeway for a discount or a bit extra off getting a backpack or sling bag.

    Sorry for the rambling post just trying to get it clear in my head.

    Is there a camera club near you? Pop along some evening, I'm sure they'll give you good advice and will probably let you try out their cameras. There's usually a good mix of makes and models in camera clubs. You won't be getting a hard sell off a salesperson either. (though a row could start over the best make of camera :pac:)


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,153 ✭✭✭dinneenp


    All camera brands are good these days really.
    Down to personal thoughts, handle several camera brands, some feel better to some people than other brands, prefer the button layout etc.
    as mentinoed- if someone else has Canon and some good lenses consider that brand
    pentax has in body stabilisation to lens can be cheaper
    not as many second hand Pentax around in-stores, have to buy them online
    I'd consider buying your camera body 2nd hand anyway- a lot cheaper. If you know your photography already (aperture, shutter etc) I'd go for a camera with top-panel lcd (I find it handy)
    do you want a articulated back lcd screen; only some have these.
    go for an afternoon mini-photowalk with someone and get a proper feel for a camera.

    Good luck.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,747 ✭✭✭Bluefoam


    There should be plenty of cameras available for that price without resorting to Alibaba


  • Registered Users Posts: 265 ✭✭markens2


    Any suggestions in or around that price? Wouldn't mind second hand if it was good.


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 2,282 Mod ✭✭✭✭angeldaisy


    I'm looking to buy a new camera, have only really had basic ones before now. But I'd really like to learn more and take better shots.

    For now our priorities are photos of family, pets, nature and holidays.

    Based on my own research I've narrowed it down to three cameras;
    Olympus Pen-e pl7
    Nikon coolpix p600 or p520
    Pentax Q7

    Any comments or suggestions?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,110 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    The Pen e-pl7 would be my pick of those three and is a good choice for your intended uses and level of interest.

    It has by far the largest sensor of the three so will have lower noise and better low light performance. The image stabilisation would help in that regard.

    Because it is a micro four thirds system camera, it would give you access to a wide variety of excellent lenses if you were to find your interest developed and better or different lenses became attractive. You could also add the VF-4 viewfinder at a later date which is apparently very good.

    If you want an idea of the image quality an E-pl7 is capable of in the right hands and with high quality lenses, Robin Wong's review would be worth a look: http://robinwong.blogspot.ie/2014/08/olympus-pen-e-pl7-review.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,747 ✭✭✭Bluefoam


    angeldaisy wrote: »
    I'm looking to buy a new camera, have only really had basic ones before now. But I'd really like to learn more and take better shots.

    For now our priorities are photos of family, pets, nature and holidays.

    Based on my own research I've narrowed it down to three cameras;
    Olympus Pen-e pl7
    Nikon coolpix p600 or p520
    Pentax Q7

    Any comments or suggestions?

    I have a Pentax Q, its a great camera.


  • Moderators, Education Moderators Posts: 2,282 Mod ✭✭✭✭angeldaisy


    Bluefoam wrote: »
    I have a Pentax Q, its a great camera.

    Is it user friendly Bluefoam?

    Is the Q7 a decent model or should I be looking at a different model?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,747 ✭✭✭Bluefoam


    angeldaisy wrote: »
    Is it user friendly Bluefoam?

    Is the Q7 a decent model or should I be looking at a different model?

    It has alot of the function of a DSLR in a very small body. The Q7 is much improved from my original Q, but the latest model is the S1...

    One of the big advantages is that the lenses are also quite small, making it very easy to carry around...


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,432 ✭✭✭Wailin


    Just for holidays, don't want to horse around a DSLR for the duration! I'm looking for something reasonably priced that will give good quality images. Thanks.


  • Registered Users Posts: 433 ✭✭JR6


    I'm looking to buy a Compact Camera to be used mostly for family occasions and the likes...
    I don't know much about cameras but I have been looking at this one...

    http://www.currys.ie/Product/canon-powershot-sx700-hs-superzoom-compact-digital-camera-black/321495/398.0.3

    Anyone know if it's any good or can they recommend any better for less than €300?


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Arts Moderators, Entertainment Moderators Posts: 9,047 CMod ✭✭✭✭CabanSail


    Wailin wrote: »
    Just for holidays, don't want to horse around a DSLR for the duration! I'm looking for something reasonably priced that will give good quality images. Thanks.

    The Canon G series has always been a good camera to take when you need to travel light. I have had two G9's and a G12 with an underwater housing. Have friends who wanted to know which DSLR to get and I have steered them towards a G and they have all come back and said it was the right choice for them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,432 ✭✭✭Wailin


    CabanSail wrote: »
    The Canon G series has always been a good camera to take when you need to travel light. I have had two G9's and a G12 with an underwater housing. Have friends who wanted to know which DSLR to get and I have steered them towards a G and they have all come back and said it was the right choice for them.


    Exactly what I was looking for, thanks :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 176 ✭✭gogreen81


    scammal wrote: »
    Electronic Digital Single Lens Reflex Cameras - EDSLR..I lifted this straight out of the FAQ in the boards cameras and accessories section..don't know myself..and good question kenny..what's the difference between digital and optical zoom?
    There's a few in argos that seem like good value..Nikon Coolpix L830 16MP Bridge Camera ticks boxes but has no lithium ion battery. also a Canon PowerShot SX510 12MP that has the battery but is only 12mp. Should I be looking for the size of the sensor or is the higher number of mp the best indicator of getting quality finished images? To be honest, the more time I spent looking at cameras, the more I knew how little I knew..


    Hi,
    Did you. someone in this thread buy L830?
    Planning to buy it from Argos.. compared with atleast 10 similar camera but this wins hands down.
    used snapsort for comparison and now i think its owned by Nikon L30 makers, or has too much data for this camera that no other camera stands against it.:)
    Any recommendation? the other I liked was Sony DSC 520


    snapsort.com/compare/Nikon-Coolpix-L830-vs-Sony-Cyber-shot-DSC-HX50V


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,029 ✭✭✭Call me Al


    I'm in the market for a new digital camera. I don't want to be dealing with detachable pieces of equipment, but do want to be able to take good quality pictures with the minimum of fuss.
    I was looking at these two Canons (mainly because our last camera was a canon and we found it to be great although it's now obsolete)
    Canon Powershot 280 or
    canon ixus 265
    I can't really see through the technical jargon on them on the currys website, but they suit my budget.
    Does any have any opinions on these two good or bad?
    Thanks
    CMA


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 176 ✭✭gogreen81


    Call me Al wrote: »
    I'm in the market for a new digital camera. I don't want to be dealing with detachable pieces of equipment, but do want to be able to take good quality pictures with the minimum of fuss.
    I was looking at these two Canons (mainly because our last camera was a canon and we found it to be great although it's now obsolete)
    Canon Powershot 280 or
    canon ixus 265
    I can't really see through the technical jargon on them on the currys website, but they suit my budget.
    Does any have any opinions on these two good or bad?
    Thanks
    CMA

    Just bought L830 (had SOny P&S earlier which got lens issues -dont rem the number ), but really liking it
    Looked into million websites and found it to be best value for money L830
    I can definitely recommend it. Argos 159 + 29 on rechargable batteries. + 1/3 discount of cover.
    Sd card cheaper from amazon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 867 ✭✭✭Nanazolie


    Hi

    So I read the sticky, typed 'new DSLR for beginners' in Google, read multiple reviews, familiarised myself with the technical jargon, etc. Still, I would be eternally grateful if someone could offer some advice as I have found numerous choices on Google and now I'm even more confused than before

    I'm a beginner, have wanted a DSLR for ages, saved a few euros every week and now I'm finally happy that I have enough budget to buy a level entry camera. May be a bridge one, I'm not fussy. I have a budget of 450€.

    My main requirement is simple: I want to be able to photograph my young kids, who are full of energy and never stop running. I don't care so much about taking pics of tiny things in the distance with great details. Also, it has to be portable enough so that I can take it with me when we are outdoors.

    Thanks a mil!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,389 ✭✭✭✭Saruman


    I would go for the Canon 100D
    It fits your budget exactly at the moment as there's €70 off.

    I have the 700D and this is very similar, just a slightly cut down version really.

    You could also go cheaper and get a mirrorless camera like this Sony but I would go for the 100D instead.

    If size is an issue, the small Canon Eos M can achieve great results from what I hear. My brother uses one.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8 CLCH79


    Hi, can someone recommend a good quality and affordable digital camera perfect for beginners? I'm looking to study photography and need something easy to use and easy to carry, was looking at Nikon cool pix L840 but someone recommended Lumix Fz70.
    Recommendations?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,747 ✭✭✭Bluefoam


    CLCH79 wrote: »
    Hi, can someone recommend a good quality and affordable digital camera perfect for beginners? I'm looking to study photography and need something easy to use and easy to carry, was looking at Nikon cool pix L840 but someone recommended Lumix Fz70.
    Recommendations?

    If you are going to study photography seriously I recommend getting a DSLR, otherwise you will find limitations and need to upgrade... There are some lower cost options and value in the secondhand market that others can fill you in on here...


  • Advertisement
Advertisement