Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi all! We have been experiencing an issue on site where threads have been missing the latest postings. The platform host Vanilla are working on this issue. A workaround that has been used by some is to navigate back from 1 to 10+ pages to re-sync the thread and this will then show the latest posts. Thanks, Mike.
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Iran Did Do It..............says Trump

12930313234

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 1,337 ✭✭✭rockatansky


    Gatling wrote: »
    Or is Iran scared ****less of Israel

    Until the balance of power is brought somewhat back in line between the two by Iran developing a small enough warhead to fit onto a ballistic missile, it knows to choose its battles carefully.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Until the balance of power is brought somewhat back in line between the two by Iran developing a small enough warhead to fit onto a ballistic missile,

    That won't balance power more likely drive Israel to hit Iran


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,337 ✭✭✭rockatansky


    Gatling wrote: »
    That won't balance power more likely drive Israel to hit Iran

    It'll make Israel think twice when Iran finally achieves it, which they will.

    Bibi knows time is running out.


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,349 ✭✭✭Jimmy Garlic


    Gatling wrote: »
    But hizbolla don't have the latest Iranian missles ,

    Iran could come out and say rouge forces lunched the attack unknown to them,but that would suggest Iran is not in control of its own weapons which could including their nuclear program,
    Which is more worrying which will lead to further international isolation and fewer friends ,

    China and putin won't be riding to the rescue of the mad mullahs

    Vladimir Vladimirovich is committed to supporting Iran.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,326 ✭✭✭Scuid Mhór


    Not to sound too hyperbolic, but this slow pace with which the relevant parties seem to be hurtling towards an unfortunate confrontation is rather reminiscent of the slow creep towards an Iraq War (which, if I'm not mistaken, the neocons were campaigning for since 1997). I can't help but feel we are witnessing in slow-motion the downward spiral leading to the worst news event of our respective lifetimes. The dominos are coming down one by one. Might be three months, might be a year, might be two, but I fear for the worst at this point in time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Vladimir Vladimirovich is committed to supporting Iran.

    Not really no ,

    They don't even have a formal alliance ,

    Putin saved face by getting Iran to commit tens of thousands of troops to Syria as he couldn't afford the losses but should he decide he's going to send potentially tens of thousands of russians to their deaths in the middle East he might change his mind with a formal alliance ,but considering Putin is slowly loosing his grip at home chances are he won't be sending russians to bail out Iran


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,349 ✭✭✭Jimmy Garlic


    Gatling wrote: »
    Not really no ,

    They don't even have a formal alliance ,

    Putin saved face by getting Iran to commit tens of thousands of troops to Syria as he couldn't afford the losses but should he decide he's going to send potentially tens of thousands of russians to their deaths in the middle East he might change his mind with a formal alliance ,but considering Putin is slowly loosing his grip at home chances are he won't be sending russians to bail out Iran

    It has been announced that they are indeed formalising an alliance.

    https://www-express-co-uk.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.express.co.uk/news/world/1166108/russia-news-vladimir-putin-iran-turkey-donald-trump-world-war-3-spt/amp?amp_js_v=a2&amp_gsa=1&usqp=mq331AQEKAFwAQ%3D%3D#referrer=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.google.com&aoh=15686699800834&csi=1&amp_tf=From%20%251%24s&ampshare=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.express.co.uk%2Fnews%2Fworld%2F1166108%2Frussia-news-vladimir-putin-iran-turkey-donald-trump-world-war-3-spt

    Bad news for the PNAC/Greater Israel crowd, great news for the Middle East. The era of Pax Americana is over.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    It has been announced that they are indeed formalising an alliance.

    To discuss normalisating Syria.

    Israel would still wipe the floor with Syria and Iran and before oul vlaidi starts a sale pitch of should buy russian didn't he tell Assad the same thing and yet Israel still strikes with impunity in Syria against Iranians .

    Seems vladis memory is short


  • Registered Users Posts: 4,349 ✭✭✭Jimmy Garlic


    Gatling wrote: »
    To discuss normalisating Syria.

    Israel would still wipe the floor with Syria and Iran and before oul vlaidi starts a sale pitch of should buy russian didn't he tell Assad the same thing and yet Israel still strikes with impunity in Syria against Iranians .

    Seems vladis memory is short

    Would Israel wipe the floor with Turkey? Iran on its own could pulverise tightly packed urban Israel with a concentrated missile attack. Iron dome is hard pressed trying to contend with home brew rockets from the Gaza strip, it would barely put a dent in a concentrated Iranian attack.it would be wise now for Israel to extend an olive branch to its neighbours.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Would Israel wipe the floor with Turkey?

    They would yes , Turkey has a big military there is no doubt there ,can they fight effectively no , they suffered a fair few losses against kurds in Syria ,
    Now put them in front of a well equipped and well trained professional military and see what happens ,

    How many armies have Israel dispatched despite being out numbered ,out gunned and less equipped .
    Didn't they all use the russian equipment too .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,179 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Gatling wrote: »
    They would yes , Turkey has a big military there is no doubt there ,can they fight effectively no , they suffered a fair few losses against kurds in Syria ,
    Now put them in front of a well equipped and well trained professional military and see what happens ,

    How many armies have Israel dispatched despite being out numbered ,out gunned and less equipped .
    Didn't they all use the russian equipment too .

    Russian equipment now is very good.

    Their Sukhoi 57 fighter jet is considered to be streets ahead of the American F35, their top market offering.

    Not all are like that but the days of the old Ww2 T72 tank shipped out to the Arabs are long gone.

    The Chinese and the Russians learnt hard lessons from the beating Saddam took.

    That said hard to get against Israel.

    If it was at risk of being destroyed America would step in and we'd have the biggest war since WW2.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 840 ✭✭✭The Late Late Show


    Not to sound too hyperbolic, but this slow pace with which the relevant parties seem to be hurtling towards an unfortunate confrontation is rather reminiscent of the slow creep towards an Iraq War (which, if I'm not mistaken, the neocons were campaigning for since 1997). I can't help but feel we are witnessing in slow-motion the downward spiral leading to the worst news event of our respective lifetimes. The dominos are coming down one by one. Might be three months, might be a year, might be two, but I fear for the worst at this point in time.

    Until Mike Pompeo, rogue agent of Gilead, is removed from office, the threat of a serious war even WW3 is real. Pompeo is a madman who will deliberately set up false flag attacks to start trouble. Nest thing, his sick regime could find itself not just at war with Iran but with Russia as well. I think Pompeo needs to hear he is sacked in a tweet too. He has overstepped the mark with this carry on. Who else had that type of drone technology and expertise only the Gileadeans or the Netanyahoonians. Or was this attack a sort of a covert sick revenge for Saudi involvement with 9/11?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,220 ✭✭✭cameramonkey


    Gatling wrote: »
    They would yes , Turkey has a big military there is no doubt there ,can they fight effectively no , they suffered a fair few losses against kurds in Syria ,
    Now put them in front of a well equipped and well trained professional military and see what happens ,

    How many armies have Israel dispatched despite being out numbered ,out gunned and less equipped .
    Didn't they all use the russian equipment too .


    The Israeli army wouldn't last against a well trained army.They couldn't even defeat a lightly armed militia in Lebanon. The armies the Israelis have dispatched were trained to oppress their own people not fight wars, if you thing the Egyptian or Syrian armies are in any way professional you are miss informed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,111 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui



    In terms of GDP, that's like the states of Texas, Pennsylvania and Maryland, getting together to take on the other states.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,220 ✭✭✭cameramonkey




  • Registered Users Posts: 267 ✭✭overkill602


    Danzy wrote: »
    Russian equipment now is very good.

    Their Sukhoi 57 fighter jet is considered to be streets ahead of the American F35, their top market offering.

    Not all are like that but the days of the old Ww2 T72 tank shipped out to the Arabs are long gone.

    The Chinese and the Russians learnt hard lessons from the beating Saddam took.

    That said hard to get against Israel.

    If it was at risk of being destroyed America would step in and we'd have the biggest war since WW2.


    Sukhoi 57 10 flyable prototypes lol

    Scared to expose it hardware to battle incase it hurts potential sales


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,111 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Danzy wrote: »
    Russian equipment now is very good.

    Their Sukhoi 57 fighter jet is considered to be streets ahead of the American F35, their top market offering.

    Not all are like that but the days of the old Ww2 T72 tank shipped out to the Arabs are long gone.

    The Chinese and the Russians learnt hard lessons from the beating Saddam took.

    That said hard to get against Israel.

    If it was at risk of being destroyed America would step in and we'd have the biggest war since WW2.

    When was the last time a Russian made jet bested an American one?

    The whole point of such aircraft is stealth - the estimated radar cross section of the F22 is 1/4000th that of the estimate for the SU 57.

    The F35 is an appalling mistake, IMO, but that said, it probably has about the same RCS as the f22 and some claim it's even lower due to a new anti radar reflective material. The situational awareness due to advanced avionics of the F35 would trump the possibly superior flight dynamics of the SU 57.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Danzy wrote: »
    Russian equipment now is very good.

    Their Sukhoi 57 fighter jet is considered to be streets ahead of the American F35, their top market offering.

    Not all are like that but the days of the old Ww2 T72 tank shipped out to the Arabs are long gone.

    The Chinese and the Russians learnt hard lessons from the beating Saddam took.

    That said hard to get against Israel.

    If it was at risk of being destroyed America would step in and we'd have the biggest war since WW2.



    I don't think it is , even the russians themselves don't want it it's an expensive project much like the Chinese Stealth fighter /bomber that aren't stealth at all ,for most part the it's a Su37 that they essentially flattened out to look stealth,
    It it came to a fight it would be the F22 Vs the SU57

    The biggest issue with russian equipment it's mass produced to be easily replaced whenever destroyed that hasn't really changed ,it was seen in the Chechen wars , Georgia and East Ukraine the latest and greatest of tanks and vehicles easily taken out even against older tanks and other armour,

    Although Russia is rebuilding it's military it's seems to be focused on a core of 100,000 men and units that can be rapidly deployed till the majority of the forces can be mobilised ,

    Putin has been peddling the SU57 to various allies none who seem to actually want it or need it ,China didn't bother , India and Pakistan didn't want it ,and turkey is developing their own homegrown stealth fighter , meanwhile the US are well ahead with development of next generation of Stealth fighters and bombers

    They do some great systems but there not perfect not at the US systems


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,111 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    US claims to have pinpointed the launch sites for the Attack on the Abqaiq oil installation. The sites are in Southern Iran and says they will present evidence to the UN general Assembly next week. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-49733558

    I think it would be bizarre if there wasn't a military response to this - Iraq attacking Kuwait, comes to mind.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,738 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    cnocbui wrote: »
    US claims to have pinpointed the launch sites for the Attack on the Abqaiq oil installation. The sites are in Southern Iran and says they will present evidence to the UN general Assembly next week. https://www.bbc.com/news/world-middle-east-49733558

    I think it would be bizarre if there wasn't a military response to this - Iraq attacking Kuwait, comes to mind.

    Well, you would always trust evidence that the US presents to the UN.

    colin-powell-un.jpg

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,111 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    The evidence doesn't matter, it's the saying they have evidence which is crucial, as it's something that has to be done before taking further actions/s.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Well, you would always trust evidence that the US presents to the UN.

    Didn't russia present deny they were in Ukraine ,shot down a civilian airliner killing all on board , attacked hospitals and civilians in Syria , denied chemical weapons were being used in Syria too ,

    Yet people keep going on about wmds .


    If that's the case we should all sit back and ignore anything going on in the world just because people will be happier to deny the obvious


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,738 ✭✭✭✭TheValeyard


    Gatling wrote: »
    Didn't russia present deny they were in Ukraine ,shot down a civilian airliner killing all on board , attacked hospitals and civilians in Syria , denied chemical weapons were being used in Syria too ,

    Yet people keep going on about wmds .


    If that's the case we should all sit back and ignore anything going on in the world just because people will be happier to deny the obvious

    Never mentioned the Russians, but you cant trust them either and are responsible for many a war crime in Syria and Ukraine.

    All eyes on Kursk. Slava Ukraini.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,705 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring2


    "Trump administration is weighing a range of options for a retaliatory action against Iran, including a cyberattack or physical strike on Iranian oil facilities or Revolutionary Guard assets, U.S. officials & others briefed on the deliberations told NBC News

    I think Trump looking for more options to avoid escalation. I would not be shocked if he pulled back and did nothing also. With Trump you can never tell.

    Pompeo is visiting Saudi Arabia and Israel just had an election. Therefore not expecting anything to happen for another few days to a week.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling



    I think Trump looking for more options to avoid escalation. I would not be shocked if pulled back and did nothing also. With Trump you can never tell.

    Avoid escalation -

    Sure if he ignores this and the previous attacks on ships and siezing ships by Iran and now a full on attack on Saudi

    It gives Iran carte blanche to attack who and what ever they want ,


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,179 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Trump won't bomb if he can avoid it all costs.

    They'll have the radar tracking, they'll have satellite images recording the flares from launches.

    If he wanted to he has the reason, he has the proof instead he is keeping low key, put it on to Arabia, who'll not want escalation.

    He is so obviously non interventionist abroad that it might be used by Iran to further escalate as a negotiation tactic.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,705 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring2


    Gatling wrote: »
    Avoid escalation -

    Sure if he ignores this and the previous attacks on ships and siezing ships by Iran and now a full on attack on Saudi

    It gives Iran carte blanche to attack who and what ever they want ,

    The Iran tanker was hijacked first at sea. Iran responded
    Israel and US often bomb Iranian backed group sites inside Iraq and Syria. Does the media complain about this?
    United states likes to pretend Iran is the aggressor in the region, when it actually the opposite.
    Iran joined the Syria war to stop the Sunni headchopper jihadists overrunning Syria. The jihadist groups were financially supoorted and armed with weapons belonging to Saudi Arabia and the UAE.
    Saudi Arabia helped and backed ISIS and Al Qaeda, so i have zero sympathy for this rogue nation.
    Saudis are fighting an illegal war in Yemen. Hundreds of thousands of innocent people have died. Babies and kids are dying daily, and not mention of it on CNN or Fox News.

    Just say Iran did it? I really could not give a crap. I just surprised it took them this long to fight back. Countries in the west don't ever accept responsibility for the mess they caused in the region.

    Saudi Arabia is leading sponsor of terrorism in the region and we have ignored it for long time. Iran hit their oil facilities hope it hurts.


  • Registered Users Posts: 31 Milosmith


    President Trump just tweeted that he's "no longer Locked and Loaded"


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Israel and US often bomb Iranian backed group sites inside Iraq and Syria. Does the media complain about this?

    Bedtime I think


  • Registered Users Posts: 267 ✭✭overkill602


    Always blame the west for the trouble in the region Iran is still a mess it was sanctioned because it wants a Nbomb and could never be-trusted it would give the bomb to any of the many proxy factions it funds in the region why can they just live in harmony like some of its neighbours, all it fcuking wants is chaos in the region, its sporting for a fight will probably target a warship next as it would up the anti.... then
    annihilate the bastards carpet bomb them to oblivion death to Iran
    or as they want nuclear so much drop a small one on them let them eat the radiation might dampen there appetite
    The saudi's are scared of there **** of the houtis "great fighters" because the could nearly walk in to ryaiad unopposed and game over its Iran's, but you can be sure the US is watching

    Seizing ships and bombing oil wells belonging and in another country is an act of war and a threat to the global economy cudios for max restraint but we can expect more.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭kildare lad


    Always blame the west for the trouble in the region Iran is still a mess it was sanctioned because it wants a Nbomb and could never be-trusted it would give the bomb to any of the many proxy factions it funds in the region why can they just live in harmony like some of its neighbours, all it fcuking wants is chaos in the region, its sporting for a fight will probably target a warship next as it would up the anti.... then
    annihilate the bastards carpet bomb them to oblivion death to Iran
    or as they want nuclear so much drop a small one on them let them eat the radiation might dampen there appetite
    The saudi's are scared of there **** of the houtis "great fighters" because the could nearly walk in to ryaiad unopposed and game over its Iran's, but you can be sure the US is watching

    Seizing ships and bombing oil wells belonging and in another country is an act of war and a threat to the global economy cudios for max restraint but we can expect more.

    But the west has caused a lot of stuff in the middle East . Does the recent war in iraq ring a bell . There was nuclear treaty in place , where Iran would receive their own money back they'd had frozen on them . Trump ripped up that treaty because Obama had signed it . Trump also put sanctions on Iran so Iran retaliated . Also america helped install a dictator in Iran In the 50s after Iran tried to nationalise their oil . They also helped Iraq during their war with Iran

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_support_for_Iraq_during_the_Iran%E2%80%93Iraq_War

    So maybe that could be a reason Iran hold a grudge While your correct about Iran arming groups in the middle East , so does America , they were arming rebel groups in Syria who were fighting along side ISIS.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,650 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    Always blame the west for the trouble in the region Iran is still a mess it was sanctioned because it wants a Nbomb and could never be-trusted it would give the bomb to any of the many proxy factions it funds in the region why can they just live in harmony like some of its neighbours, all it fcuking wants is chaos in the region, its sporting for a fight will probably target a warship next as it would up the anti.... then
    annihilate the bastards carpet bomb them to oblivion death to Iran
    or as they want nuclear so much drop a small one on them let them eat the radiation
    might dampen there appetite
    The saudi's are scared of there **** of the houtis "great fighters" because the could nearly walk in to ryaiad unopposed and game over its Iran's, but you can be sure the US is watching

    Seizing ships and bombing oil wells belonging and in another country is an act of war and a threat to the global economy cudios for max restraint but we can expect more.

    So you would like to kill a couple of million innocent people because they refuse to bow to the Yanks?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,179 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    But the west has caused a lot of stuff in the middle East . Does the recent war in iraq ring a bell . There was nuclear treaty in place , where Iran would receive their own money back they'd had frozen on them . Trump ripped up that treaty because Obama had signed it . Trump also put sanctions on Iran so Iran retaliated . Also america helped install a dictator in Iran In the 50s after Iran tried to nationalise their oil . They also helped Iraq during their war with Iran

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_support_for_Iraq_during_the_Iran%E2%80%93Iraq_War

    So maybe that could be a reason Iran hold a grudge While your correct about Iran arming groups in the middle East , so does America , they were arming rebel groups in Syria who were fighting along side ISIS.

    To a degree that us true but it is also true that people overegg the West is at fault for everything line.

    There were imperial wars empires and regional rivalries 10000 years ago, when this country, for example was still recovering from the ice age.

    The war in Iraq was damaging but this is all about another war in Iraq.

    The battle of Karbala.

    The fallout from that has manifested in near every century in the Middle East.

    They have their own motivations, capable of their own thought and actions. Might not be popular to say that the trend is to view them as helpless, in need of saving by passionate activists.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,220 ✭✭✭cameramonkey


    Danzy wrote: »
    There were imperial wars empires and regional rivalries 10000 years ago, when this country, for example was still recovering from the ice age.


    That's fascinating,what imperial wars were these and what regional rivalries?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,010 ✭✭✭kildare lad


    Danzy wrote: »
    To a degree that us true but it is also true that people overegg the West is at fault for everything line.

    There were imperial wars empires and regional rivalries 10000 years ago, when this country, for example was still recovering from the ice age.

    The war in Iraq was damaging but this is all about another war in Iraq.

    The battle of Karbala.

    The fallout from that has manifested in near every century in the Middle East.

    They have their own motivations, capable of their own thought and actions. Might not be popular to say that the trend is to view them as helpless, in need of saving by passionate activists.

    Well if that's the case , maybe they need brutal dictators to keep everyone in line. I'm reading a book about the SAS in iraq at the minute. The civil war that started there after the occupation would make the conflict in the north look like child's play . Shia and Sunni Muslims blowing up each other's neighbourhoods , killing 50, 60, 70 people with each bomb . In Libya they helped got rid of Gaddafi , theres now slave markets in Libya. They armed the rebels in Syria and also bombed targets for them , how's Syria now?? Saddam was a c*nt but there'd be a hell of a lot more people alive if America hadn't invaded. They invaded Iraq with false information and they knew it was false. We didn't have suicide bombing in Europe till the Yanks and the Brits decided to invade Iraq and neither did we have millions of refugees coming to Europe. Maybe if the Yanks read a few history books instead of listening to lies from neo conservative politicians , there'd be a few more people walking around including their own soldiers


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Saudi are currently displaying the physical evidence of drones recovered from the oil site attack ,
    Looks pretty damning wreckage of 8 + Iranian drones sitting in front of the UN security council


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,705 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring2


    Gatling wrote: »
    Saudi are currently displaying the physical evidence of drones recovered from the oil site attack ,
    Looks pretty damning wreckage of 8 + Iranian drones sitting in front of the UN security council

    Houtis have all these weapons in their arsenal. Have not yet seen proof these are weapons Iran used to strike Saudi Arabia. Houtis have already claimed responbility and Iran itself said the Houthis did it.

    US and Saudi Arabia first claimed Iraq was involved. They then switched it to blaming Iran.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,578 ✭✭✭Markcheese


    Gatling wrote: »
    Saudi are currently displaying the physical evidence of drones recovered from the oil site attack ,
    Looks pretty damning wreckage of 8 + Iranian drones sitting in front of the UN security council
    So if someone turns up with wreckage of missiles fired at Yemen will it mean the Americans did it..
    I don't doubt the drones were Iranian... Or that suits the Iranians

    Slava ukraini 🇺🇦



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Houtis have all these weapons in their arsenal. Have not yet seen proof these are weapons Iran used.

    Stop enough of the alternative opinion


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,291 ✭✭✭✭Gatling


    Markcheese wrote: »
    I don't doubt the drones were Iranian... Or that suits the Iranians

    It wasn't the American butler in the library now .


    The Drones and missles are Iranian there is no other explanation .

    It's not the rebels in Yemen ,they weren't launched from Yemen


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,705 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring2


    Gatling wrote: »
    Stop enough of the alternative opinion

    They displayed their new arsenal in July this was inside Yemen, not Iran. US and Saudi Arabia have not presented any evidence yet showing Iran launched this attack.

    Here is video of the houtis showing off these new weapons- drones and cruise missiles.

    Quds cruise missile you see in the video, is the missile the Saudis are now displaying.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,111 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Were i running a country, I would make no distinction between enemy A firing missiles at me and enemy A giving enemy B the missiles to fire at me. It's still enemy A having a go; not much use employing a fig leaf to try and disguise that fact.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,179 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Houtis have all these weapons in their arsenal. Have not yet seen proof these are weapons Iran used to strike Saudi Arabia. Houtis have already claimed responbility and Iran itself said the Houthis did it.

    US and Saudi Arabia first claimed Iraq was involved. They then switched it to blaming Iran.

    How many goat herders have missiles?

    In all seriousness though, the rockets all came from the wrong side for Houthi fired weapons.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,179 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Well if that's the case , maybe they need brutal dictators to keep everyone in line. I'm reading a book about the SAS in iraq at the minute. The civil war that started there after the occupation would make the conflict in the north look like child's play . Shia and Sunni Muslims blowing up each other's neighbourhoods , killing 50, 60, 70 people with each bomb . In Libya they helped got rid of Gaddafi , theres now slave markets in Libya. They armed the rebels in Syria and also bombed targets for them , how's Syria now?? Saddam was a c*nt but there'd be a hell of a lot more people alive if America hadn't invaded. They invaded Iraq with false information and they knew it was false. We didn't have suicide bombing in Europe till the Yanks and the Brits decided to invade Iraq and neither did we have millions of refugees coming to Europe. Maybe if the Yanks read a few history books instead of listening to lies from neo conservative politicians , there'd be a few more people walking around including their own soldiers


    The damage done from the invasion of Iraq will still be playing out for most of our lives.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,279 ✭✭✭✭smurfjed


    The saudi's are scared of there **** of the houtis "great fighters" because the could nearly walk in to ryaiad unopposed and game over
    The fantasies are getting better, do you really think that the houties have the required supply chains to traverse a 800 km desert?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,784 ✭✭✭Beta Ray Bill


    They displayed their new arsenal in July this was inside Yemen, not Iran. US and Saudi Arabia have not presented any evidence yet showing Iran launched this attack.

    Here is video of the houtis showing off these new weapons- drones and cruise missiles.

    Quds cruise missile you see in the video, is the missile the Saudis are now displaying.

    Without a doubt the most alarming thing about this (for the US and it's allies) is that MIM-104 Patriot was not able to stop this attack.

    My understanding is that the Saudi's are the biggest operator of this weapon after the US.
    I wouldn't imagine they are to happy that the system was unable to protect their assets.

    The system seems to be effective against SCUDs and Long Range missiles, but seems vulnerable to drone attacks.
    There should have been cover, the SAM has a near 100km range

    The Drone just waltzed in and completed it's objective.
    No news one whether the Drone made it out though. That being said the fact that there are no pics of a downed drone indicates it probably did make it out (more bad news)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,705 ✭✭✭Cheerful Spring2


    Danzy wrote: »
    How many goat herders have missiles?

    In all seriousness though, the rockets all came from the wrong side for Houthi fired weapons.

    Not true actually.

    New York times reported on it.
    "Where the strikes originated remains unclear Administration officials have not publicly said where they believe the attack originated from. They did say that the satellite imagery was consistent with strikes from the north or northwest, which would point to an attack coming from the direction of Iran or Iraq, rather than from Yemen.But the satellite photographs released on Sunday were not as clear-cut as officials suggested, with some appearing to show damage on the western side of the facilities, not from the direction of Iran or Iraq.
    https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2019/09/16/world/middleeast/trump-saudi-arabia-oil-attack.html

    Houtis claimed responbility
    Iran said Houtis did it.
    US and Saudi Arabia, claimed first the missiles were fired from Iraq. Day later they blamed Iran.
    What proof have the provided the weapons were launched from Iran?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,111 ✭✭✭✭cnocbui


    Without a doubt the most alarming thing about this (for the US and it's allies) is that MIM-104 Patriot was not able to stop this attack.

    My understanding is that the Saudi's are the biggest operator of this weapon after the US.
    I wouldn't imagine they are to happy that the system was unable to protect their assets.

    The system seems to be effective against SCUDs and Long Range missiles, but seems vulnerable to drone attacks.
    There should have been cover, the SAM has a near 100km range

    The Drone just waltzed in and completed it's objective.
    No news one whether the Drone made it out though. That being said the fact that there are no pics of a downed drone indicates it probably did make it out (more bad news)

    And exactly how many patriot missiles were fired?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,179 ✭✭✭✭Danzy


    Trump has no interest in regime change or war with Iran, he is lowering tension instead of racheting it up now that he has an excuse.

    Iran would be be very costly to conquer, it would be the biggest effort since ww2.

    It could be demolished militarily and infrastructure wise in weeks but it can also take out Saudi oil infrastructure, maybe even sink a tanker in Hormuz, block the straits.

    Nevermind the teams it has in place all over the world to hit US targets abroad in such an event.

    Could still escalate out of control.

    It'll be easy for America to level everything above a hen house in a few weeks, easier again for Iran to kill the global economy, nevermind say taking out Us embassies or corporate offices across Europe etc.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement