Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Snobbery in education.

18911131421

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,770 ✭✭✭The Randy Riverbeast


    Permabear wrote: »
    This post had been deleted.

    Wait, trinity is a top tier world university?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,059 ✭✭✭Shelga


    Permabear wrote: »
    This post had been deleted.

    Could it be that this type of language is what's winding certain posters up? Dare I say, snobby? ;) I wouldn't call DCU a 'backwater' institution. Not sure why they get quite so upset about though- the basic idea that Harvard is more renowned than DCU is undeniable.

    I think people take this so personally and are desperate to prove they're just as intelligent and hardworking as someone from Harvard, when the chances are, they're not. Important point is in bold. I'm not as innovative and intelligent an engineer as an MIT graduate. Most of my friends would admit likewise about themselves- why is is such an issue for people on this thread to do similar?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,565 ✭✭✭✭steddyeddy


    Shelga wrote: »
    Could it be that this type of language is what's winding certain posters up? Dare I say, snobby? ;) I wouldn't call DCU a 'backwater' institution. Not sure why they get quite so upset about though- the basic idea that Harvard is more renowned than DCU is undeniable.

    I think people take this so personally and are desperate to prove they're just as intelligent and hardworking as someone from Harvard, when the chances are, they're not. Important point is in bold. I'm not as innovative and intelligent an engineer as an MIT graduate. Most of my friends would admit likewise about themselves- why is is such an issue for people on this thread to do similar?

    No sh1t. Then the poster in question has a whinge when someone dares to say that STEM degrees tend to be more valuable and more difficult. One truth is more palatable than another it seems.


  • Posts: 12,694 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    All snobbery come from insecurity and from that insecurity comes the desire to put other down to make up for the inadequacy the snob feels.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,770 ✭✭✭The Randy Riverbeast


    steddyeddy wrote: »
    No sh1t. Then the poster in question has a whinge when someone dares to say that STEM degrees tend to be more valuable and more difficult. One truth is more palatable than another it seems.

    An arts student not wanting to compare courses. Probably spent years with med students annoyed at the arts students holding back the university.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 12,694 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    There are somewhat objective standards of education that can somewhat be measured, but you cant extrapolate from that to saying anything about the person except about their academic ability.

    I am bemused by the fact that people who attend certain universities or study certain subjects are considered a master race of some kind. largely by themselves that is.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 39,019 ✭✭✭✭Permabear


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 27,565 ✭✭✭✭steddyeddy


    mariaalice wrote: »
    All snobbery come from insecurity and from that insecurity comes the desire to put other down to make up for the inadequacy the snob feels.

    Bigtime. I have can think of one person who constantly talks about other schools like some of the posts we've seen here and he's one of the most insecure people I know.

    My boss is from MIT and I work with people from similar universities. Not one of them obsesses over "backwater intuitions". It just doesn't happen and it makes me really suspicious when someone paints this snobby view of things. One of the posters here and the people who thank his posts constantly making a dig at other institutions is just insecurity about something or another.


  • Posts: 12,694 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    I went to see a choral concert at the weekend it was given by the students of an American university and it was at professional level, now the students were not professional musicians they all did this as an extra activity while studying at undergraduate level. There would be keeping up with a huge amount of choral practice while studying at a highly academic level. I looked up the university and the acceptance rate is 18%. The sort of people who represent their county in a sport in while studying a highly academic subject or who takes on any extra activity that requires a huge amount of commitment are to be admired and are possibly existing at at different level that most people.

    As for the snobbery thing, There is a difference between saying on objective standards x is better than y or believing that because you attended x you personally are a superior in some way.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 39,019 ✭✭✭✭Permabear


    This post has been deleted.


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 43,000 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Permabear wrote: »
    This post had been deleted.

    True but how much chance does your average secondary school graduate with their cúpla focail, even if they get 550+ points stand of getting into any good US school?

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 39,019 ✭✭✭✭Permabear


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,201 ✭✭✭languagenerd


    . I know there are other variables at play, but it takes a lot more determination and effort for someone who had to put in 25-30 hour weeks lab/lecture time in a STEM course than someone on 15 hours a week studying some of the easier arts course.

    Timetabled hours really don't mean anything. I did a 15-hour (class-time) a week degree and we had a huge amount of work to do outside of class hours. It's a different sort of course - lots of STEM courses need the scheduled lab hours for the practical components (because you need the lab facilities), whereas the "practical" learning in an Arts or Humanities subject can be done in the library and therefore didn't need to be scheduled as such. My course involved at least 20 hours working on my own each week, as well as 15 hours lectures which were really just to focus our attention on various areas that we had to study in depth in our own time. It's a different sort of challenging, maybe, but they can be equally tough.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 39,019 ✭✭✭✭Permabear


    This post has been deleted.


  • Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 26,162 Mod ✭✭✭✭CramCycle


    steddyeddy wrote: »
    Out of interest Cramcycle how are IT grads lab skills? I'd wager they can be nearly better than those with a bachelors.
    Generally yes, particularly in certain subject areas but it is very institute and course dependent.
    steddyeddy wrote: »
    I think the poster meant very few people in Ireland actually apply to Harvard. As Cramcycle said you can't compare the Irish and US system.
    I know people who contemplated it but when you look at the fees, it is just not practical for a majority of irish people. Their undergrad system is different than ours. Can you compare Harvard against any of our 3rd level institutes, not at all. I have no doubt that the expected standards for entry are far higher, dictated mainly by cost. The US system also allows alot of room to maneuver within your undergrad. Do I think alot of Irish would get into Harvard if they started applying? Probably not, our education system is not built for it either, there is generally not enough extra there and the LC is to diverse. It's not impossible but it would realistically be something a student would have been planning for early in their secondary school cycle and is dependent on far more than just their education.
    Shelga wrote: »
    Could it be that this type of language is what's winding certain posters up? Dare I say, snobby? ;) I wouldn't call DCU a 'backwater' institution. Not sure why they get quite so upset about though- the basic idea that Harvard is more renowned than DCU is undeniable.

    I think people take this so personally and are desperate to prove they're just as intelligent and hardworking as someone from Harvard, when the chances are, they're not. Important point is in bold. I'm not as innovative and intelligent an engineer as an MIT graduate. Most of my friends would admit likewise about themselves- why is is such an issue for people on this thread to do similar?
    You are completely right, to get into Harvard you have to have been hard working before you arrived, the Irish education system doesn't require that. i didn't do a tap for my leaving, looking at my daughters leaving last year, I have no doubt that the way i am now, I could pick up a good score in the leaving currently with minimal work outside of my job. DCU is not a backwater institution, considering the way we have to balance our undergrad numbers to get finance, it is an impressive feat that any Irish institute if in the top 400 at all. Considering the thousands of verified 3rd level institutions in the world, to get on the top 800 list at all is an achievement in itself. People think being down the list is bad but they miss the point that getting on the list in itself is good.

    At a postgraduate level it is a different story, for most colleges, it very applicant dependent not where they got their degree.

    The thread, I thought was academic snobbish between Irish institutions, along the lines of "how many graduates from the following institutions does it take to screw in a lightbulb?

    TCD - one to hold it in the air and let the world revolve around them
    UCD - two, one to change the bulb and another to explain how they done it every bit as well as someone from TCD
    AIT - one to unscrew it and the other to break it, sniff the gas and get high
    ITT - five, one to change the lightbulb and four to give out to someone that if they were in a better college it wouldn't have went out
    DIT - 30, one to change the lightbulb and then the rest oof his class to throw a party for doing it correctly.
    IT Sligo - All of them, not that they are at anything anyway.

    Basically, between irish institutions it is pointless, every institution here as strengths and weaknesses, different courses of different calibres. For every employable situation, I could make suggestions for the most likely institute to look at if that's what you were doing but truthfully I would sooner call in the ones with the better CVs and then see which one has the right attitude and personality.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 39,019 ✭✭✭✭Permabear


    This post has been deleted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 39,019 ✭✭✭✭Permabear


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,466 ✭✭✭✭Ush1


    Permabear wrote: »
    This post had been deleted.

    AFAIK, the points system is based on demand and number of places, not the difficulty of the course.

    Least it was when I was filling in my CAO form 12 odd years ago.

    EDIT: Yep, I was right:

    "Once the Leaving results are announced in mid-August, it takes a few days for the CAO and the colleges to calculate how many points will be required for acceptance on to each course in the CAO system. This is done on an anonymous supply-and-demand system"

    http://www.gotocollege.ie/CAO_points_system.html


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,059 ✭✭✭Shelga


    Permabear wrote: »
    This post had been deleted.

    I hadn't a clue about any of this when I was 17, nor did it cross my mind to try and find out. Rather than hoping Trinity turns into Harvard overnight, maybe guidance counsellors and secondary educators could make students more aware of the options open to them outside the Irish system.

    Maybe this wouldn't make much of a difference- Harvard's website shows that 29 Irish people were admitted last year, which seems broadly in line with other similar countries, even high. Was I missing the day they handed out all the Ivy League brochures? :P


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34 rhabarbarum


    Ah, the age-long practice of telling people that your life choices are superior to theirs.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 28 bkqwerty


    Went to NUIG and we always referred to GMIT as "the zoo" but it was only a bit of craic and not something taken seriously by anyone (I think!). There's very good courses in both colleges.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,935 ✭✭✭Anita Blow


    Permabear wrote: »
    This post had been deleted.


    Because of this, the admissions process is much more rounded and selective than it is in Ireland. Universities look not only at the person's academic record, but take a much more rounded view of the individual and what he or she has the capacity to achieve.

    I'd add that even a reasonably smart student with around 500 points probably shouldn't go to Harvard, where he or she will instantly be in the bottom 5%, and will struggle to keep up.[/quote]
    While that type of admissions process clearly has benefits like you mentioned, it isn't without flaws. The benefit of the CAO system is that it is entirely objective, there is no opportunity for getting in based on who you know or what your family has done, and it removes other types of bias. But I think more importantly is that it doesn't funnel people into a career when they're in their early teens. The CAO & points system offers extreme flexibility for students so that they aren't constrained by meeting numerous entry requirements beyond those basic requirements for a specific course to ensure they aren't completely clueless. I look at my family back in the US now and I have one member who has had to know she wanted to do medicine since she was 14 as all her extracurriculars have to be geared towards that, and had to do a hospital elective at 15 abroad just so she had a competitive application and I look at another who has had to go through a serious amount of undue stress requiring medication because an injury meant he lost his place on 2 school teams and has now jeopardised his chance for the course he wants in college. Ironically I find that forced 'well-roundedness' that colleges demand less beneficial for the student.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 984 ✭✭✭gutenberg


    Shelga wrote: »
    I hadn't a clue about any of this when I was 17, nor did it cross my mind to try and find out. Rather than hoping Trinity turns into Harvard overnight, maybe guidance counsellors and secondary educators could make students more aware of the options open to them outside the Irish system.

    Maybe this wouldn't make much of a difference- Harvard's website shows that 29 Irish people were admitted last year, which seems broadly in line with other similar countries, even high. Was I missing the day they handed out all the Ivy League brochures? :P

    Was that for the undergraduate programme, or across all their programmes - law school, business school, school of government etc? I know a few Irish people doing a postgraduate degree at Harvard - typically either at the Business School or at the Kennedy - but 29 students at undergraduate seems very high, given the small size of Harvard College and how it's much more difficult to get in as an international student at undergrad level.


  • Posts: 12,694 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Anita Blow wrote: »
    While that type of admissions process clearly has benefits like you mentioned, it isn't without flaws. The benefit of the CAO system is that it is entirely objective, there is no opportunity for getting in based on who you know or what your family has done, and it removes other types of bias. But I think more importantly is that it doesn't funnel people into a career when they're in their early teens. The CAO & points system offers extreme flexibility for students so that they aren't constrained by meeting numerous entry requirements beyond those basic requirements for a specific course to ensure they aren't completely clueless. I look at my family back in the US now and I have one member who has had to know she wanted to do medicine since she was 14 as all her extracurriculars have to be geared towards that, and had to do a hospital elective at 15 abroad just so she had a competitive application and I look at another who has had to go through a serious amount of undue stress requiring medication because an injury meant he lost his place on 2 school teams and has now jeopardised his chance for the course he wants in college. Ironically I find that forced 'well-roundedness' that colleges demand less beneficial for the student.

    That is an excellent point, someone in the Irish system representing Ireland in sport singing dancing or whatever while studying is doing it out of a genuine love of what they are doing and not because it will get them in to the right college or graduate program, the cynicism of doing something because it will get you in to a college or the right graduate job does not make a well rounded person in fact it is more likely to make you an arrogant cynical A***H I would think.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 39,019 ✭✭✭✭Permabear


    This post has been deleted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,468 ✭✭✭✭OldNotWIse


    I find the "snobbery" is not always a one way street. Plenty of people just waiting to slag you off for going to what they think is a better college. Their issue really. I think sometimes people view colleges in the same way as designer clothes - the name might be "designer" but the quality is another thing. My undergrad was in Trinity. It was an over-subscribed, high points course. The same course in UCD was actually far superior, from a teaching perspective. If I'd to do it all again I wouldn't step food inside TCD to be honest (at least for that course)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 39,019 ✭✭✭✭Permabear


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,466 ✭✭✭✭Ush1


    Permabear wrote: »
    This post had been deleted.

    You're assuming it's to do with students aiming or acting "irrationally" when you don't know that to be the case at all.

    You asked what is the difference between the two courses based on the points required, I gave you the answer that the demand-number of places is higher in one than the other.

    Here's the one very obvious difference, Trinity is smack dab in the middle of Dublin city, the most densely populated area of the country by far.


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 43,000 CMod ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    OldNotWIse wrote: »
    If I'd to do it all again I wouldn't step food inside TCD to be honest (at least for that course)

    And there's the other kind of snobbery.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,201 ✭✭✭languagenerd


    Permabear wrote: »
    This post had been deleted.

    Reputation is one factor (which sort of comes down to this snobbery we're talking about), but location is another (better social scene in Dublin, plus just the sheer number of people who already live in the city) and facilities would be a big one. Trinity has the best library of any of the Irish universities as it is the only Copyright Library in the country - it has a copy of every single publication published in Ireland and the UK.

    It might also come down to course content - I don't know about Law and Business but I did languages, and while Trinity is known to teach the highest standard of written language, DCU has much more practical content (ie Translation). So if your end goal was to get a language-based job, DCU might appeal to you more, or if you wanted to take electives in entirely different subjects, then UCD's program would be your best bet. And then the possibilities for Erasmus differ between all three.

    Some colleges and some courses definitely do have better reputations than others, but it all really depends on what your aims are and which course best suits them. Reputations are sometimes deserved (if the facilities are much better or the lecturers are particularly good), but there's no point being snobby about it.


Advertisement