Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Breaking - explosions at Brussels Airport **Mod warning in post 1**

1333436383961

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,544 ✭✭✭Samaris


    I agree that the police shouldn't be stifling peoples' talking on Twitter, even when they're idiots. I suppose it doesn't help, mind, people saying **** like that without any sort of proof and it COULD qualify as "incitement to hatred". Yer man was an attention-seeking Fwit, but probably wasn't going to HELP matters by giving him police attention /eyeroll. Now he really does have something to moan about.

    Btw, it has been clarified that it was nothing Mister Tantric Massage Teacher experienced himself, he just "heard" that "some Muslim kids were doing so". By 10.10 the morning of. Hell of a grapevine. Hence my slating of him.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,040 ✭✭✭12Phase


    Big problem in Iraq was caused by that f!!kwit Paul Bremer refusing to integrate former Baath Party members into the new Iraqi military or police. He was told that he needed to do this or else trouble would brew.

    Being the arrogant arse that he was, he refused, leaving a lot of militarily trained men unable to get work, used to being big cheeses, and now with a chip on their shoulders.

    These guys are the cornerstone of Daesh in Iraq.

    There are a lot of tribal affiliations in these regions which influence things. Not to mentions religious affiliations.

    That's what I mean though - It's naive and arrogant to assume that you even have a full understanding of something as complicated as that.

    For example, if you went into NI having read several books on NI you could probably completely miss the subtleties of the situation and end up causing an absolute disaster and restarting the troubles.

    There are a lot of awkward status quos and if you fiddle with them too much you can suddenly cause horrific issues with old scores being settled that could be across multiple centuries never mind what you think the geopolitical situation is.

    The impression I get is that highly qualified advisors are meddling arrogantly and causing absolute mayhem as they don't understand the unintended consequences of what they are doing.

    I also don't think that some US academics and politicians in particular fully understand the tie to the land notions that exist in older cultures as the US is 'new' and people are highly geographically mobile and come from generations of people who literally moved there and see nothing odd about just upping sticks and going somewhere newer / better / nicer / different.
    There's been a lot of 'ah sure they can just move' approaches. You see that in the Israel - Palestine scenario. A lot of people I've spoken to in America could do with watching The Field to get a sense of just how deep those ties go and how people can feel about ancestral lands.

    Even the current situation is insane. They're basically depopulating Syria as people flood out to escape the mess. How exactly is that country going to rebuild itself if its brightest and best are long gone to Germany or elsewhere?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,452 ✭✭✭✭The_Valeyard


    Liberosis wrote: »
    The very chilled out approach by our government certainly is worrying. But perhaps those other countries mentioned have intelligence to suggest a step up in security is needed while we don't. Enda seems to think we are in more danger of gangland violence in Dublin rather than terrorism.

    I would wonder with the links the IRA has around the globe and training camps, etc would we be an 'off limits' target. As in, some bizarre terrorist code of contact.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 35,839 ✭✭✭✭NIMAN


    buried wrote: »
    Every single government that has existed in the last 80 years, be they leftwing or rightwing, are the ones to blame for allowing the fascist state of Saudi Arabia to breed and fund this fascist trash spreading hate and violence throughout the entire planet. Al-Qaeda, ISIS, Taliban, Islamic Jihad, etc all these violent scum created through Saudi money and military backing and not one cowardly hypocritical political leader from any nation that sucks the Saudi Arabian oil knob has anything to say about it. Globalisation at its finest. What happened in Belgium this morning is the latest result of it. But no matter, watch European heads of state roll out the red carpets and gold plated horse carriages for headhunting Saudi gangsters who have spent decades unleashing their wahhabi schooled lunatics to blow innocent people up on the same European streets. PATHETIC.

    So you are basically saying we are all suffering now due to our dependence on oil?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,116 ✭✭✭RDM_83 again


    I would wonder with the links the IRA has around the globe and training camps, etc would we be an 'off limits' target. As in, some bizarre terrorist code of contact.

    Nah if your going to follow that logic we would be bigger targets, hezzoballah and Ghadfi weren't friends of IS types


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,492 ✭✭✭stoplooklisten


    Why no facebook campaign with the Belgian flag, or am I just out of the loop?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,061 ✭✭✭✭briany


    buried wrote: »
    Every single government that has existed in the last 80 years, be they leftwing or rightwing, are the ones to blame for allowing the fascist state of Saudi Arabia to breed and fund this fascist trash spreading hate and violence throughout the entire planet. Al-Qaeda, ISIS, Taliban, Islamic Jihad, etc all these violent scum created through Saudi money and military backing and not one cowardly hypocritical political leader from any nation that sucks the Saudi Arabian oil knob has anything to say about it. Globalisation at its finest. What happened in Belgium this morning is the latest result of it. But no matter, watch European heads of state roll out the red carpets and gold plated horse carriages for headhunting Saudi gangsters who have spent decades unleashing their wahhabi schooled lunatics to blow innocent people up on the same European streets. PATHETIC.

    Since Saudi Arabia seems to be such a problem for the west, why has the west never thought to simply invade Saudi Arabia, get full control of the oil, boot out the ruling dynasty, install a liberal democracy (TM) and cut off that oil money faucet to the likes of ISIS, etc?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,504 ✭✭✭Polo_Mint


    I would wonder with the links the IRA has around the globe and training camps, etc would we be an 'off limits' target. As in, some bizarre terrorist code of contact.

    lol


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,685 ✭✭✭walshyn93


    Samaris wrote: »
    I agree that the police shouldn't be stifling peoples' talking on Twitter, even when they're idiots. I suppose it doesn't help, mind, people saying **** like that without any sort of proof and it COULD qualify as "incitement to hatred". Yer man was an attention-seeking Fwit, but probably wasn't going to HELP matters by giving him police attention /eyeroll. Now he really does have something to moan about.

    Btw, it has been clarified that it was nothing Mister Tantric Massage Teacher experienced himself, he just "heard" that "some Muslim kids were doing so". By 10.10 the morning of. Hell of a grapevine. Hence my slating of him.

    When facts are "incitement to hatred" we're entering into a dangerous relationship with our government.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 848 ✭✭✭Superhorse


    Samaris wrote: »
    I think it's UNLIKELY that Ireland would be a target. France, UK, Spain, USA, Germany, Brussels (as the de facto administrative "capital" of the EU). Ireland? I think it'd have to be a lone wolf that just happened to live here going nutty. -If it was going to happen- though, the Easter Rising celebrations would seem like a "fitting" time.

    Overall though, no, I don't really see Dublin being anywhere -near- the top of the list.

    Security here is a complete nonsense. Inevitably ISIS will target weak points such as ourselves when security is beefed up on the mainland. Let's face it right now any jerk with a suicide vest could walk onto the Luas and target many innocents. I travelled back on the green line from work today and I didn't see a single security guard or Gardaí. I'll agree at present it's unlikely but I think we as citizens need to be very vigilant from here on in.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,040 ✭✭✭12Phase


    briany wrote: »
    Since Saudi Arabia seems to be such a problem for the west, why has the west never thought to simply invade Saudi Arabia, boot out the ruling dynasty, install a liberal democracy (TM) and cut off that oil money faucet to the likes of ISIS, etc?

    Also, if you want to talk about regime change for the sake of humanitarianism - North Korea would surely be #1 on the list.

    The justifications for intervention / lack of intervention seem to be totally illogical.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,975 ✭✭✭buried


    NIMAN wrote: »
    So you are basically saying we are all suffering now due to our dependence on oil?

    Dependance has nothing to do with it, Col. Gaddafi or Saddam's regimes and the crimes against their own people or the wider world weren't ignored for oil dependance were they? Why does Saudi Arabia get a free pass brutalizing its own people and the entire planet?

    Bullet The Blue Shirts



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 848 ✭✭✭Superhorse


    I would wonder with the links the IRA has around the globe and training camps, etc would we be an 'off limits' target. As in, some bizarre terrorist code of contact.

    Embarrassed for you tbh.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,685 ✭✭✭walshyn93


    briany wrote: »
    Since Saudi Arabia seems to be such a problem for the west, why has the west never thought to simply invade Saudi Arabia, get full control of the oil, boot out the ruling dynasty, install a liberal democracy (TM) and cut off that oil money faucet to the likes of ISIS, etc?

    What could go wrong?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,452 ✭✭✭✭The_Valeyard


    12Phase wrote: »
    Also, if you want to talk about regime change for the sake of humanitarianism - North Korea would surely be #1 on the list.

    The justifications for intervention / lack of intervention seem to be totally illogical.

    Yeah North Korea be number one on that list.


    Didn't Bush have them on the 'axis of evil' but then they got nukes so the whole thing was quietly dropped .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,975 ✭✭✭buried


    briany wrote: »
    Since Saudi Arabia seems to be such a problem for the west, why has the west never thought to simply invade Saudi Arabia, get full control of the oil, boot out the ruling dynasty, install a liberal democracy (TM) and cut off that oil money faucet to the likes of ISIS, etc?

    Good question. They seem to be able to do it everywhere else. Democracy campaigners in SA get their heads chopped off whenever they seek it. Look what happened in Bahrain also.

    Bullet The Blue Shirts



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,452 ✭✭✭✭The_Valeyard


    Superhorse wrote: »
    Embarrassed for you tbh.

    Be embarrassed for yourself. Simple point I was putting out there, about links between different militant groups. So f*k your post. Stand by what I said.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,685 ✭✭✭walshyn93


    Superhorse wrote: »
    Security here is a complete nonsense. Inevitably ISIS will target weak points such as ourselves when security is beefed up on the mainland. Let's face it right now any jerk with a suicide vest could walk onto the Luas and target many innocents. I travelled back on the green line from work today and I didn't see a single security guard or Gardaí. I'll agree at present it's unlikely but I think we as citizens need to be very vigilant from here on in.

    We have a very low Muslim population and geographical isolation to thank for the lack of bombs going off. Let's keep it that way.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,452 ✭✭✭✭The_Valeyard


    Nah if your going to follow that logic we would be bigger targets, hezzoballah and Ghadfi weren't friends of IS types

    Suppose that's true, Ghadfi let the Ra train in his backyard and we'll known the RA were training the Hezzoballah boys. Suppose just different circles or 'clicks' for terrorists.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,493 ✭✭✭long range shooter


    walshyn93 wrote: »
    We have a very low Muslim population and geographical isolation to thank for the lack of bombs going off. Let's keep it that way.

    It only takes one to do severe damage.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,461 ✭✭✭✭darkpagandeath


    It only takes one to do severe damage.

    People don't seem to realise how much a soft Target we are. They are going after soft targets. We are western and on their list.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,040 ✭✭✭12Phase


    Superhorse wrote: »
    Security here is a complete nonsense. Inevitably ISIS will target weak points such as ourselves when security is beefed up on the mainland. Let's face it right now any jerk with a suicide vest could walk onto the Luas and target many innocents. I travelled back on the green line from work today and I didn't see a single security guard or Gardaí. I'll agree at present it's unlikely but I think we as citizens need to be very vigilant from here on in.

    I think realistically you're going to have to see the creation of a Euro FBI and CIA to deal with this. I know we probably don't like the idea of federalising things and centralising those kinds of functions, but it's looking like its an inevitable requirement if we want to maintain our ability to move around the EU at will.

    It's something we need to start debating and actually discussing rationally too. I don't think there's necessarily anything wrong with federalising certain things *if* they have the necessary democratic oversight in place and they're fully transparent.

    I would be extremely uncomfortable with the idea of handing power over to the current setup as it's just not a functioning democracy and it lacks transparency.

    There are a lot of things that smaller countries can't do effectively and those include things like intelligence led security for globalised terrorists.

    I can assure you ISIS don't respect EU internal borders so which are really just 'Chinese walls' anyway.

    We urgently need to redesign how the EU works as all of these crisis, including the European Financial Crisis are getting totally out of hand and it's all down to lack of democratic structures in place to deal with them as everyone's terrified of the "F" word. (Federal).

    My view is that the EU is actually a good thing but that it's completely screwed up and has been expanding by function creep instead of a proper structure.

    It neither has the mandate (legally or morally) nor the resources or budget to deal with the refugee crisis, nor border security, nor the terrorism issue nor with the European fiscal / financial / banking meltdown.

    I mean, seriously why are we letting Greece get that screwed up? It's an absolute disgrace and a total indictment of the EU and make us look weak, disorganised and incapable of organising a pi$$ up in a brewery.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 15,061 ✭✭✭✭briany


    12Phase wrote: »
    Also, if you want to talk about regime change for the sake of humanitarianism - North Korea would surely be #1 on the list.

    The justifications for intervention / lack of intervention seem to be totally illogical.

    They're not really, though, if you look below the surface. The justification of going to war seems to be predicated on whether it's economically advantageous to do so. That's basically what war has always been about in controlling territory and resources. If the US suddenly felt a major economic incentive to steamroll Saudi Arabia, they would do it yesterday. Frankly, the concern over whether it would radicalize more Muslims or anything like that would be an afterthought, I think. The effects of such an invasion wouldn't really affect the well-being of the decision makers anyway. For some reason, Islamic terrorists don't seem to prioritise the assassination of political leaders in the west, even though I think that would agitate things more.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 848 ✭✭✭Superhorse


    Be embarrassed for yourself. Simple point I was putting out there, about links between different militant groups. So f*k your post. Stand by what I said.

    So much rage. If you think ISIS give a hoot about the IRA or there is any unwritten code you know nothing about these head chopping animals. They hate all us all and won't stop until they bring about the caliphate... I'm not even going to bother as I said your post was embarrassing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,671 ✭✭✭dav3


    Superhorse wrote: »
    Security here is a complete nonsense. Inevitably ISIS will target weak points such as ourselves when security is beefed up on the mainland. Let's face it right now any jerk with a suicide vest could walk onto the Luas and target many innocents. I travelled back on the green line from work today and I didn't see a single security guard or Gardaí. I'll agree at present it's unlikely but I think we as citizens need to be very vigilant from here on in.

    I'd say there's a far greater chance of being killed by some scumbag on the green line luas than being killed by some terrorist.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88 ✭✭Liberosis


    That muppet Donald Trump on twitter...

    @realDonaldTrump
    My heart & prayers go out to all of the victims of the terrible #Brussels tragedy. This madness must be stopped, and I will stop it


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,433 ✭✭✭The Raptor


    Liberosis wrote: »
    The very chilled out approach by our government certainly is worrying. But perhaps those other countries mentioned have intelligence to suggest a step up in security is needed while we don't. Enda seems to think we are in more danger of gangland violence in Dublin rather than terrorism.

    It is worrying. The explosions also happened beside the departures for Dublin, did I read that correctly. I don't know if the plane left before the explosions or if it was due to leave after but what would happen if they boarded the flight to Dublin with the intention of an attack on Dublin.

    The USA stepped up their security and they aren't even in Europe. But Ireland, such a we're fine attitude.

    I think they could easily target Dublin if we're so laid back.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,493 ✭✭✭long range shooter


    People don't seem to realise how much a soft Target we are. They are going after soft targets. We are western and on their list.

    Yes and our politicians sits behind army and security,safe everyday,while we are walking targets.
    Sounds promising this.
    And now EU will take away the guns from law abiding citizens in the EU as well.
    Europe can just dig its own grave.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 848 ✭✭✭Superhorse


    walshyn93 wrote: »
    We have a very low Muslim population and geographical isolation to thank for the lack of bombs going off. Let's keep it that way.

    I agree. The secret is we need a government who can stand up and not just allow anybody to come here. We must have intense checks on each and every Muslim coming to Ireland and actively encourage them to integrate. If they refuse they shouldn't be allowed stay here and sent back to their country of origin.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 848 ✭✭✭Superhorse


    dav3 wrote: »
    I'd say there's a far greater chance of being killed by some scumbag on the green line luas than being killed by some terrorist.

    Oh that's okay then we'll just ignore the threat.


Advertisement