Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Breaking - explosions at Brussels Airport **Mod warning in post 1**

1181921232461

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 848 ✭✭✭Superhorse




  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,685 ✭✭✭walshyn93


    wes wrote: »
    Your comparing a political party and a Religion. One is an organization with a single leader, the other is composed of various sects, with varying beliefs and no single leader.

    The fact that you think both are the same is rather hilarious.

    If anything the political party example is even more damning, since the majority opinion was irrelevant in a setting where the views of the group should be reflected in their actions.

    Nazi parties are banned in many countries because of the actions of a small minority within a small minority.

    The fact that you cannot make sense of the comparison is either a sign of unwillingness to accept that your world view is messed up or plain ignorance.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,191 ✭✭✭Eugene Norman


    ThisRegard wrote: »
    The irony being that Fox News and Trump are at odds with each other, they've attacked him for what they describe as having a sick obsession with Megyn Kelly. You know someone has extreme right wing views when Fox News has a falling out with you.

    He's not right wing enough for them. They want war in Iran.


  • Moderators, Music Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 25,734 Mod ✭✭✭✭Boom_Bap


    Yes, the comments on an internet site make you want to vomit, not the 30 odd people blown to pieces by an Islamic terrorist.... Uber PC brah:cool: 20 inclusion and diversity points for you.

    JPNelsforearm - That's enough from you on this thread.
    Do not post in the thread again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,678 ✭✭✭frozenfrozen


    What actually can be done? It's seemingly all too easy to get 10 or 15 like minded individuals together, get some 1970's era military gear and take several innocent lives.

    It would be obtuse to not assume this was extremist muslims. I would be shocked if this turned out to be unrelated to the recent happenings in Brussels re: the perpetrators of the paris attacks


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,671 ✭✭✭dav3


    b_mac2 wrote: »
    Good to see left wing tactics in full effect here, shouting racist and bigot to any facts or reasoning pointed at them.

    You forgot 'It's PC gone mad' in your post.

    There reality is so many racists and bigots crawl out of the woodwork when events like this happen spouting their hatred, you can see them a mile off. Just because you haven't seen the posts, doesn't mean they never happened.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 88 ✭✭Liberosis


    Christy42 wrote: »
    What if an Iranian and a German have a child in America. What nationality is that child now?

    American.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 689 ✭✭✭Straight Edge Punk


    dav3 wrote: »
    You forgot 'It's PC gone mad' in your post.

    There reality is so many racists and bigots crawl out of the woodwork when events like this happen spouting their hatred, you can see them a mile off. Just because you haven't seen the posts, doesn't mean they never happened.

    You do know it's OK to completely condemn these attacks and blame their religion without being racist or bigoted right?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,191 ✭✭✭Eugene Norman


    wes wrote: »
    Your comparing a political party and a Religion. One is an organization with a single leader, the other is composed of various sects, with varying beliefs and no single leader.

    The fact that you think both are the same is rather hilarious.

    You ever hear of a religion called Catholicism though?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,027 ✭✭✭sunshine and showers


    Some people here seem to have difficulty grasping the very basic distinction between wanting to get rid of Islamic terrorism and wanting to get rid of Muslims full stop.

    Wanting the first is normal. Wanting the second makes you a bigoted idiot, not someone being oppressed by "PC gone mad".


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,224 ✭✭✭✭jmayo


    Should immigration on the scale it is happening now (open borders) be stopped?

    Yes it should

    For once we agree on something.
    Should we send someone who has lived here for 30 years away to another land simply because their parents moved here in the 70's?

    No we shouldn't.

    But what do we do with the child of an immigrant that has turned to fundamentalist terror movements ?

    What do we do with the likes of the London bombers
    (Mohammad Sidique Khan, Shehzad Tanweer, Hasib Mir Hussain)
    the murderers of Lee Rigby
    (Michael Adebolajo, Michael Adebowale)
    the Paris Charlie Hebdo attackers
    (Chérif and Saïd Kouachi, Amedy Coulibaly)
    if they are caught before they carry out their attacks ?

    What do you suggest we do with people like these ?

    Do you suggest we try giving them some courses to try dissuade them from wanting to slaughter us non muslims ?

    Muslims have been proven not to integrate as well as some other groups and all of the above were created in some fashion by that non integration.

    Why do people want to introduce even more people into Europe who do not want to integrate and create a vicious cycle where we have even more of the above type of guys.

    I am not allowed discuss …



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    jmayo wrote: »
    For once we agree on something.



    But what do we do with the child of an immigrant that has turned to fundamentalist terror movements ?

    What do we do with the likes of the London bombers
    (Mohammad Sidique Khan, Shehzad Tanweer, Hasib Mir Hussain)
    the murderers of Lee Rigby
    (Michael Adebolajo, Michael Adebowale)
    the Paris Charlie Hebdo attackers
    (Chérif and Saïd Kouachi, Amedy Coulibaly)
    if they are caught before they carry out their attacks ?

    What do you suggest we do with people like these ?

    Do you suggest we try giving them some courses to try dissuade them from wanting to slaughter us non muslims ?

    Muslims have been proven not to integrate as well as some other groups and all of the above were created in some fashion by that non integration.

    Why do people want to introduce even more people into Europe who do not want to integrate and create a vicious cycle where we have even more of the above type of guys.


    The murderers of lee rigby were converts to islam and born in Britian, afaik.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,862 ✭✭✭✭Timberrrrrrrr


    jmayo wrote: »
    For once we agree on something.



    But what do we do with the child of an immigrant that has turned to fundamentalist terror movements ?

    What do we do with the likes of the London bombers
    (Mohammad Sidique Khan, Shehzad Tanweer, Hasib Mir Hussain)
    the murderers of Lee Rigby
    (Michael Adebolajo, Michael Adebowale)
    the Paris Charlie Hebdo attackers
    (Chérif and Saïd Kouachi, Amedy Coulibaly)
    if they are caught before they carry out their attacks ?

    What do you suggest we do with people like these ?

    Do you suggest we try giving them some courses to try dissuade them from wanting to slaughter us non muslims ?

    Muslims have been proven not to integrate as well as some other groups and all of the above were created in some fashion by that non integration.

    Why do people want to introduce even more people into Europe who do not want to integrate and create a vicious cycle where we have even more of the above type of guys.

    Lock em up and throw away the key.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,685 ✭✭✭walshyn93


    wes wrote: »
    Your comparing a political party and a Religion. One is an organization with a single leader, the other is composed of various sects, with varying beliefs and no single leader.

    Islam has a single leader. I think we all know his name. They are lead by a dead guy from the 7th century which is what explains their barbarity.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,493 ✭✭✭long range shooter


    Some people here seem to have difficulty grasping the very basic distinction between wanting to get rid of Islamic terrorism and wanting to get rid of Muslims full stop.

    Wanting the first is normal. Wanting the second makes you a bigoted idiot, not someone being oppressed by "PC gone mad".

    And how do you tell the difference?When the bomb goes off?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,749 ✭✭✭✭wes


    Is it OK so say that Muslims did this yet? I got banned for a month for saying it was Muslims a few hours into the Paris attacks.

    So all Muslims are to blame? Even Shia's, Sufi's and other Sunni Muslims, who ISIS also attack on a regular basis, even there to blame for ISIS as well?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2 mr_sheen


    thomil wrote: »
    Thank you, thank you, thank you!!! Much of this thread has been a cesspit of bigotry and hatred. The irony is that terrorists, like the monsters who carried out these attacks, thrive on divisions, they thrive on an "us-vs.-them" mentality, it is their best recruiting tool. "See, they don't want you, they hate you and your family. Join us, you're welcome here, and we'll help you strike back at these people who've been doing nothing but insulting you and shoving you around!"

    So by painting all muslims as terrorists, or all people from one region, as terrorists, those "staunch defenders of western civilisation" are actually acting as accomplices of the attackers, aiding and abetting them. Too bad they aren't perceptive enough to recognise the cruel irony.

    how do you know this is correct ?

    how do you know what will make the terrorists win ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,449 ✭✭✭Call Me Jimmy


    seamus wrote: »
    You forgot Oslo, 2011. 77 dead.

    Oh wait, that wasn't a Muslim attack. Never mind, it didn't happen.

    Religion is a vehicle. If Christianity was the majority religion in the regions these terrorists come from, these killings would be occurring in the name of Christianity.

    Focussing all of your ire on Islam is rather pointless, it won't solve any issues. And experience teaches us over and over that when you attack or attempt to suppress a specific ideology, it becomes violent and dangerous.

    No when you attack the people holding an ideology it doesn't go well, but attacking the ideology is paramount (imo the medium to long term strategy) hence why the attacks on the cartoonists are so significant. Stuff like father ted was the last nail in the coffin for catholicism here, where we all openly look at how stupid it all is. Could a muslim version of father ted ever air? Think about that


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,685 ✭✭✭walshyn93


    Some people here seem to have difficulty grasping the very basic distinction between wanting to get rid of Islamic terrorism and wanting to get rid of Muslims full stop.

    Wanting the first is normal. Wanting the second makes you a bigoted idiot, not someone being oppressed by "PC gone mad".

    No one is talking about getting rid of Muslims.

    But talking about preventing more from coming is not bigoted. It's just common sense.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,597 ✭✭✭tigger123


    The attacks today are probably another case of leaderless jihad. No amount of deportations or carpet bombing will be able to prevent it.

    Young Islamic people being radicalized online then acting on their own initiative.

    Better integration coupled with better funded intelligence agencies is what's needed.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,685 ✭✭✭walshyn93


    wes wrote: »
    So all Muslims are to blame? Even Shia's, Sufi's and other Sunni Muslims, who ISIS also attack on a regular basis, even there to blame for ISIS as well?

    He didn't use the word "all" once in his post.

    Don't misrepresent what people are saying.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,133 ✭✭✭Shurimgreat


    Where-ever Islam goes, chaos, terror and destruction usually follows. The problems of the middle east are being imported into Europe now, the main one being Islam.

    Suicide bombs, terror attacks, the works, always follow where Islam goes. It doesn't matter if the vast majority of Muslims are peaceful. The problem is their religion, not the practisers.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,685 ✭✭✭walshyn93


    tigger123 wrote: »
    The attacks today are probably another case of leaderless jihad. No amount of deportations or carpet bombing will be able to prevent it.

    Young Islamic people being radicalized online then acting on their own initiative.

    Better integration coupled with better funded intelligence agencies is what's needed.

    When has that ever worked?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,027 ✭✭✭sunshine and showers


    And how do you tell the difference?When the bomb goes off?

    I sincerely hope this is some poor taste humour.
    walshyn93 wrote: »
    No one is talking about getting rid of Muslims.

    But talking about preventing more from coming is not bigoted. It's just common sense.

    Sorry, did you miss the part about deporting all Muslim immigrants, first and second generation?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,597 ✭✭✭tigger123


    walshyn93 wrote: »
    When has that ever worked?

    The current approach isn't working and needs to be rethought.

    More efforts need to be made by all communities.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,749 ✭✭✭✭wes


    walshyn93 wrote: »
    If anything the political party example is even more damning, since the majority opinion was irrelevant in a setting where the views of the group should be reflected in their actions.

    Well not really, as there multiple factors in regards to rise of Nazism, and again you comparison is nonsense.
    walshyn93 wrote: »
    Nazi parties are banned in many countries because of the actions of a small minority within a small minority.

    Nazi's parties are banned, and not all right wing parties.
    walshyn93 wrote: »
    The fact that you cannot make sense of the comparison is either a sign of unwillingness to accept that your world view is messed up or plain ignorance.

    Your comparison is utter tosh. I addressed the issue with it, which you have chosen to ignore, as it doesn't suit your world view.

    So again a political party, is an organization that has a leader, a religion is comprised of various sects, with varying beliefs, and no single leadership. If you think these 2 things are comparable, then its safe to say you have no idea what your talking about.

    Now if you let say compared ISIS or Al Qaeda to the Nazi, then you would have a valid point, as both are organizations with a leader, and hence comparable.

    So, get back to me, when you actually address what I said, as opposed to whatever you decide to trot out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,752 ✭✭✭Lights On


    No when you attack the people holding an ideology it doesn't go well, but attacking the ideology is paramount (imo the medium to long term strategy) hence why the attacks on the cartoonists are so significant. Stuff like father ted was the last nail in the coffin for catholicism here, where we all openly look at how stupid it all is. Could a muslim version of father ted ever air? Think about that

    Four Lions would fall under that category I reckon, a movie of course not a TV show like Fr Ted. But the same basic premise.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,221 ✭✭✭A_Sober_Paddy


    Just a tad off topic...

    A was in a conversation with a Muslim convert after Hollande's declared war on Isis after Paris, he was saying that anyone arrested in relation to the attacks should be treated as prisoners of war, is that the kind of response a resonible person has after innocent people were gunned down in the name of paeodophile(mohammed) and make believe person in the sky(ala/god)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 103 ✭✭Hurtbuthealing


    My condolences to the families of the dead and injured
    A crime against humanity


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2 mr_sheen


    iguana wrote: »
    There are no easy answers about how to solve terrorism like this. Stupid knee-jerk reactions about not allowing refugees and kicking out European muslims will not solve this. They will in fact make it worse. At the same time ignoring the fact that religious communities can use their scriptures to isolate people from the wider community of the country they live in and radicalise them into terrorists. That the level of tolerance we show in Europe sometimes, often goes beyond tolerance and is actually special treatment and it makes our society look weak to people who benefit from seeing that as a weakness.

    I believe that one of the first steps in solving this kind of issue is an absolute elimination of allowing special treatment for religious belief. People can be whatever religion they want, they can hang out and worship with those of their own religion and worship together if they do so in a way that bothers nobody else. But beyond that, no special treatment. If you can't wear a head covering in an official/id photo, there is to be no exception for religious reasons. If headcoverings are forbidden in certain premises, like banks, there is to be no exception for hijabs or turbans. If you want to get your son circumcised, tough, if it's medically necessary that's different but if it's because it's written in some millenia old document, then no, your son keeps his foreskin. Have an issue with women wearing trousers and short skirts? Keep it to yourself, if groups start to harrass women on the streets of certain neighbourhoods then the police need to be a massive on foot presence in those areas until the message gets through that this shít won't be tolerated. Does your workplace forbid necklaces? Then no you can't wear your cross, Star of David, pentagram, whatever. This isn't discrimination, it's removal of special treatment. Want religious schooling for your kids? Then pay for it yourself, it's not the state's job to pay for religious indoctrination of children. Not any religion, no matter how it has always been done. And if a religious group does fund a religious school, or a family homeschools for religious reasons, then Tusla/Ofsted/appropriate body of that country need to be performing ongoing checks and ensuring that the children know the difference between the worth of modern scientific theory versus best guess of an imaginative bronze age dweller when it comes to explaining the universe. No special permission for religious call to prayers to breach noise pollution laws or given special place in state broadcasts. No opening a business and thinking your religion gives you special permission to ignore discrimination legislation. Everyone is to be treated equally. Genuinely equally. Because allowing religious groups special status is a part of what has led to this. It's not the only cause, but it has played it's part and if we want to have any chance of stopping such attacks, we need to eliminate every cause. Tolerance for private belief should be absolute, special treatment needs to end.

    Alongside that we have to, as nations, stop contributing to the complete and total breakdown of societies where many of these immigrants have come from. (First and foremost because it's fúcking murder and the people of Syria deserved to be allowed live peaceful lives in their home country. And while the conflict there has many causes, Europe and America have played their part in causing and worsening it.) Even though the terrorists are usually second and third generation immigrants and themselves European citizens, conflicts involving their 'brethren' are used as justification. The massive destabilisation of the Middle East can't not have knock on effects for Europe. So implementing real ways to help people live safely in their homes is necessary to stopping what is happening here. Ceasing weapons sales, smart sanctions against despotic regimes and no more carpet bombing which results in significant 'collateral damage.'


    special treatment for specific groups ( and more of it ) is what the left wants in spades

    beit travellers , muslims or any other perceived victims you can name

    kicking out millions of european muslims is not only immoral , its completely undoable , we do however need to be allowed discuss peoples fears , the dominance of leftist thought in the media in europe has meant that people are fearful of speaking , this actually gives rise to far right extremists

    the left ( in ireland and europe ) shoulders a huge amount of blame for the current situation and have made it much worse than it might otherwise be , the threat from ISIS is tiny by comparsion with the existential threat europe faced during the cold war from the soviet union , ISIS are too weak in a technological sense or any other one to pose a major threat , that no solace to their victims and i dont mean to sound insensitive

    the dominance of PC thought must be slayed however in the media , right now if you are a member of a left wing sacred cow , beit islam or travellers , the truth cannot be told

    when lies permeate , a solution will not be found


Advertisement