Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Unpopular opinions

Options
1828385878892

Comments

  • Registered Users Posts: 16,250 ✭✭✭✭Iwasfrozen


    c_man wrote: »
    *yawn* Do you call Canadians "American" since you know, they are from America? Or do realise how stupid how that would sound?

    Try telling a Brazilian they aren't American and let me know how you get on good man!


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,434 ✭✭✭Robsweezie


    Spoilers in general do not ruin the experience for me unless they are movie related that give away endings and twists.

    Minor Spoilers for soaps/ recurring dramas for example " X will get pregnant, X will develop a drug addiction" do not bother me as they have no ending, only provide a bit of background as to what's to come for the characters and builds anticipation. I don't like having character deaths and top secret twists spoiled however. Especially whodunnit reveals.

    People who moan about non fiction reality TV spoilers like big brother can go and ****. I can understand if you're slightly annoyed if you see who's been voted off before watching it, but other than that it's stupid.


  • Registered Users Posts: 7,725 ✭✭✭SureYWouldntYa


    Oftentimes I'll read the plot section of the Wikipedia page of a movie I'm watching, while watching it and spoil the ending. So I can concentrate more on what's happening now, rather than waiting to see what's coming. :D

    That's one of the most ridiculous things I've ever seen

    Why bother even watching it if you know what's going to happen ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,191 ✭✭✭Eugene Norman


    Anything based on actual famous and well known events, be they movies, TV shows, and books, should be fair game for spoilers. The 1916 rising show, called Rebellion, has "please, no spoilers" in it's title on the TV forum. I mean, really. Almost every one knows how it ends, otherwise why would you watch it?

    Psst: it doesn't end well.

    Yet I've watched ten Christmas carols and a dozen hamlets.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,191 ✭✭✭Eugene Norman


    That's one of the most ridiculous things I've ever seen

    Why bother even watching it if you know what's going to happen ?

    Because it's about how it was done. Why watch anything twice?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 3,137 ✭✭✭PressRun


    Why bother even watching it if you know what's going to happen ?

    Going by that logic, there's no value in re-watching a film or re-reading a book, and I don't think that's true at all.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 11,126 Mod ✭✭✭✭Say Your Number


    One thing that has annoyed me about David Bowie's death is radio stations playing his music non-stop, when Lemmy died a few weeks ago I didn't hear any Motorhead on the radio at all, Lemmy was an equally iconic and influential figure, I think most radio stations thought 'We've played Ace of Spades once, thank God we don't have to listen to that noisy sh1te for a while' and when Bowie died 'Bowie's dead, well then we must play as much of his music as possible'

    I don't have anything against Bowie or them playing his music, it's the double standard I find annoying.


  • Registered Users Posts: 8,446 ✭✭✭Corvo Attano


    I don't have anything against Bowie or them playing his music, it's the double standard I find annoying.

    Hardly a double standard. Just a case of more radio presenters/listners being fans of Bowie than Moterhead. The music fits most stations better.


  • Registered Users Posts: 3,137 ✭✭✭PressRun


    One thing that has annoyed me about David Bowie's death is radio stations playing his music non-stop, when Lemmy died a few weeks ago I didn't hear any Motorhead on the radio at all, Lemmy was an equally iconic and influential figure, I think most radio stations thought 'We've played Ace of Spades once, thank God we don't have to listen to that noisy sh1te for a while' and when Bowie died 'Bowie's dead, well then we must play as much of his music as possible'

    I don't have anything against Bowie or them playing his music, it's the double standard I find annoying.

    Was he though? I'm sure Lemmy meant a lot to plenty of people, but I wouldn't quite place him in the same bracket as Bowie in terms of cultural impact or iconic status. Bowie crossed generations and genres, it's almost impossible to quantify his influence on the musical landscape. It's difficult to think of many artists in any art form who are quite as iconic as Bowie.


  • Moderators, Entertainment Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 11,126 Mod ✭✭✭✭Say Your Number


    OK then, not only is it an unpopular opinion it's wrong too :o


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 8,446 ✭✭✭Corvo Attano


    OK then, not only is it an unpopular opinion it's wrong too :o

    Too late. Apologies are no good now. You must be destroyed for your sins.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,796 ✭✭✭Azalea


    Iwasfrozen wrote: »
    Try telling a Brazilian they aren't American and let me know how you get on good man!
    I know. They'd agree they're not American and that they're Brazilian/South American - scary stuff all right.


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,091 ✭✭✭marmurr1916


    Azalea wrote: »
    "Irish cuisine" to me is just standard meat and veg stuff that's pretty universal throughout the western world, no?

    Not really. It's more of a northern European thing, and places where northern Europeans colonised.

    You're not going to get meat, veg and spuds as staples of European Mediterranean cuisine.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,531 ✭✭✭jooksavage


    OK then, not only is it an unpopular opinion it's wrong too :o

    :D It kind of depends on your social circles I guess. Although I was never fond of Motorhead (and am a huge Bowie fan), most of my close friends (and ALL of the of the guys I play music with) are more cut up over Lemmy than Bowie. Perhaps Lemmy's following was smaller but more dedicated.


  • Registered Users Posts: 20,928 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    Elemonator wrote: »
    As a professional pianist/drummer, I gig on Friday nights after work. It drives me spare when people go on about drums being easy (hardest imho) and Travis Barker/Dave Grohl being the best drummer in the world. I could blow both away. Maybe its because of the nature of my workplace (I work in finance). There is no best drummer. There may be prominent drummers that in my opinion maybe the best in their genres such as:

    Jazz: Max Roach/Elvin Jones
    Rock: John Bonham
    Best in history: Buddy Rich
    Current world leader: Dave Weckl

    technically perhaps....but not really


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,495 ✭✭✭✭Billy86


    I know good as nothing about drumming, and even though they're a completely 'meh' band, isn't Carter Beauford of Dave Matthews Band supposed to be some kind of fecking drumming wizard?



  • Registered Users Posts: 3,137 ✭✭✭PressRun


    I don't quite understand what's supposed to be so 'meaningful' about those Facebook posts Roddy Doyle puts up any time a famous person dies or a significant event comes to pass.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 426 ✭✭custard gannet


    PressRun wrote: »
    I don't quite understand what's supposed to be so 'meaningful' about those Facebook posts Roddy Doyle puts up any time a famous person dies or a significant event comes to pass.

    They are quite funny, although I had to laugh at the David Bowie one going on at about 10am on Monday with the photo of the pint glasses. Startin early lads :pac:


  • Registered Users Posts: 12,968 ✭✭✭✭bnt


    The legacy of Cecil John Rhodes has been in the news recently, with some folks getting offended at statues of him on the university campuses in Cape Town and Oxford. He was, along with Rudyard Kipling, the public face of Colonialism in all its glory. There's a thread about Rhodes in AH today.

    Colonialism is on my mind for other reasons, too. Despite attempts to bury it under the weight of history, I don't think we've seen the last of it. When I look at the mess we call the Middle East today, I can't help imagining a scenario in which Colonialism makes a return to the world stage. Let me start with a thought experiment:

    January 2017: Donald Trump is sworn in as President of the United States of America. (What, you think it could never happen?)
    January 2018: in his first State of the Union address, after thanking the Secret Service for thwarting four separate assasination attempts, the President lays out the Trump Doctrine. In it he describes the Middle East conflicts as "war between puppies and kittens", and says "we're going over there to show you how it's done".
    2018-19: the Sixth Fleet sails up the Persian Gulf, accompanied by dire warnings to Iran against interfering in any way. An expeditionary force takes over the deep water port of Umm Qasr, under US Air Force air superiority cover, and dozens of cargo ships offload four brigades from the Third Army, with all their inventory, while support units muster across the border in Kuwait. The Army rolls on Basrah, and takes it with little resistance.
    The Americans and their allies announce that they are in Basrah Province to stay: there are no plans to hand it back. It is to become a U.S. unincorporated territory, on a par with Puerto Rico.
    Over the next few years, the US colonial authorities practically rebuild the city of Basrah from the ground up, starting with basic infrastructure such as sewers, water, and roads. Religious freedom is not restricted in any way: people of all faiths and none are accepted. Curfews and travel restrictions are gradually lifted.
    The territory under US control expands to include the massive Rumallah oil fields, which are exploited as soon as Exxon and Chevron can land their people and gear.
    A free trade zone in Umm Qasr fosters regional trade, attracting investors from Saudi Arabia and the UAE. The US Colonial zone gradually expands.
    President Trump dies in mysterious circumstances, which frees his company to build a Trump Tower in Basrah, on the riverside, though permission to build a Casino is denied.
    The economic success of Basrah attracts people from Iran and Saudi Arabia as well from all across as Iraq itself. Areas of Iran near the border join the colony, after inviting American troops in to protect against any efforts by the Iranian government to stop them.

    I could go on, but you get the idea. One of the reasons Colonialism is so reviled today has to do with its paternalistic attitude towards the "natives", and I'm imagining a scenario in which an American President comes straight out with a statement of that sort: "yes, we do know better, and we're going to prove it". Along with that would come a rejection of cultural relativism, of any notion that other cultures are "different but equal", to be replaced with "our Enlightenment values are better, and we're no longer ashamed to say so". Just as World War II brought the USA together in a common cause, a future President could propose "fixing the world, our way" as a new unifying aim. American Exceptionalism, on the world stage again.

    I'm not entirely convinced that this would be a bad thing. Yes, the USA has cocked up their involvement in the Middle East so far, but I'm talking about a war footing: political will, cross-party support and long-term investment on an entirely different scale. I'm going to ignore any counter-arguments that don't take this in to account. Just as the Apollo Program long outlived President Kennedy, a New Colonialism project of this scale could survive the vicissitudes of US domestic politics and gain cross-party support - as long as they have the strength of their convictions.

    tl:dr; Colonialism may by set for a comeback in the Middle East, and it might just work if the Colonisers stick to their guns.

    From out there on the moon, international politics look so petty. You want to grab a politician by the scruff of the neck and drag him a quarter of a million miles out and say, ‘Look at that, you son of a bitch’.

    — Edgar Mitchell, Apollo 14 Astronaut



  • Registered Users Posts: 19,237 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    That there's really no such thing as people who are alive today that believe the earth is flat.

    They are attention seeking a-holes craving someone to engage with them and the best thing to do is ignore them until the go away.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,158 ✭✭✭thattequilagirl


    I hate when saying facts like "It's unhealthy to be very overweight" is characterized as fat shaming.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,587 ✭✭✭Pocoyo


    Alan Kelly is a likeable chap.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,419 ✭✭✭cowboyBuilder


    I hate Game Of Thrones

    Misogynistic drivel.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    I hate Game Of Thrones

    Misogynistic drivel.

    Sorry, authors doing medieval themed fantasy will be sure to bring in gender equality in future.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,419 ✭✭✭cowboyBuilder


    Nodin wrote: »
    Sorry, authors doing medieval themed fantasy will be sure to bring in gender equality in future.

    You should know... yeah ?

    Edit - anyway, isn;t this the unpopular opinions thread ??

    I don't post this in the GoT thread ..


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,815 ✭✭✭SimonTemplar


    Regarding the Oscar controversy...

    There should be complete equality but has anyone actually considered the possibility that the Academy actually voted for the performances they considered were the best and the fact they are all white is just a coincidence.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Regarding the Oscar controversy...

    There should be complete equality but has anyone actually considered the possibility that the Academy actually voted for the performances they considered were the best and the fact they are all white is just a coincidence.

    This year? Might entirely be possible. No idea why people are getting worked up over it this time round over many others.


  • Registered Users Posts: 11,126 ✭✭✭✭castletownman


    Regarding the Oscar controversy...

    There should be complete equality but has anyone actually considered the possibility that the Academy actually voted for the performances they considered were the best and the fact they are all white is just a coincidence.

    Agreed. And the flip side of it is if they included one "token" black nomination, they'd be giving out about that as well.


  • Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 7,223 Mod ✭✭✭✭Michael D Not Higgins


    Regarding the Oscar controversy...

    There should be complete equality but has anyone actually considered the possibility that the Academy actually voted for the performances they considered were the best and the fact they are all white is just a coincidence.

    I don't think it's so much that the Academy aren't picking noteworthy black roles for the nominations, rather they are arguing the industry as a whole is racist and the ability for black actors to get the roles that end up being Oscar-worthy is limited.

    I have seen an analysis of the previous 15 (I think) years which showed the ratio of black winners for acting Oscars was in line with the American population proportionally. Not sure how it lines up with the nominees.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 11,812 ✭✭✭✭sbsquarepants


    I hate Game Of Thrones

    Misogynistic drivel.

    A fair few of the most powerful characters are women?:confused:

    Hot women, who tend to whip their tits out a bit i'll grant you - but women nonetheless. If I was a hot woman, I'd whip them out every chance I got!


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement