Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Single life as a guy...

1262729313286

Comments

  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,343 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Fukuyama wrote: »
    Yeah, I'd have to agree with you there. It's quite hard to discuss without opening up the possibility of being labeled a misogynist. But I do think it's quite common in Irish marragies and relationships.
    It's pretty much a universal theme. If anything Irish women are more easygoing IME/IMHO. Certainly compared to the "macho" Latin cultures.
    bcklschaps wrote: »
    I have had more than one male friend tell me up straight ..that if it weren't for the kids, he'd be out the door faster than you can say "Legal Separation"
    All but two of my married friends have expressed similar. However, don't take this kinda thing as a true reflection of the inner workings of their marriage. They may simply be blowing off steam at that moment. Whinging for the sake of it. The "she never lets me out" another version of that. If they were single in the morning I'd bet the vast majority would find another excuse not to go out with "the lads".
    They used to say that Married Men lived longer and were happier than their single brothers
    Apparently that's not true and was based on one small scale US study. Wider studies have shown very little of a connection at all, indeed celibate clergy average longer lives. The lowest longevity is found among divorced men and they were originally lumped in with the single cohort. The rate of suicide for divorced men is three times higher than background(the rate for divorced women doesn't change). Plus any such study would be by definition out of date as marriages of say the 1930's had a different dynamic to a marriage of the 2000's. No doubt you could pull a stat from the same numbers that strongly favoured traditional marriages as being the best. Married men have notably lower testosterone levels so that might have an effect on longevity as they'd take fewer physical risks?

    As a generalisation I would feel that the genders view relationships quite differently and their approach can differ too(it can also vary with age). Years ago I read an interesting story about a chap(German IIRC?) who had been in a coma for a couple of years. Towards the end of this he was awake, a victim of that trapped in syndrome. Anyway he noticed a difference in the genders of the staff(who figured he was unconscious so were open). he noted the men talked far more about things than people, the women were talking much more about relationships(not just romantic).

    For many men relationships are less a focus. They almost have to be cajoled into them. :) Certainly in the majority of the hetero relationships I've known it's usually the woman driving the different relationship milestones, subtly and not so subtly. This might be seen as controlling by some men*. And relationships have such milestones, they most definitely follow a script with few enough versions of same.

    Me personally, I suppose I've just been screwed over once too often and have also seen mates of mine screwed over, so that I figure the odds and think "nope". Of the relationships I've seen and know that work they wouldn't be for me as a general thing, at the moment anyway, but that would be a personal quirk of mine. I reckon some have a limited number of times they can fall in love and men are more limited in general and I'm particularly limited. I suppose my headspace isn't woman friendly romantic relationship wise. As mates, yep more than fine, but there is a very different dynamic going on there.
    I don't see that in my own life, but I can only take you (and the other guys that have posted on this) at your word that it does happen.
    Men will rarely say this kinda thing to women, even if they're friends. I have found some women partners to be shockingly oblivious to their boyfriend/husbands feelings. As I said many men want to live like that so wouldn't complain anyway. They're happy with it. Other men figure well this is what marriage is all about. So while I - believe it or not :D- wouldn't be nearly as pessimistic as some on this, the fact that this is another universal meme that has been told and retold since god was a boy tells us that it has some truth. The more recent growth of all this men going their own way(avoidance IMH)** and Red pill guff is reflecting something out there.












    *SarahMollie used the phrase "modern domesticated man", it would be humble that this subtle pressure is actually a form of domestication. It also comes from society, not just women and I would contend it's part of what made us modern humans. Look how many male romantic symbols across all sorts of art and cultures are "wild", "bad boys". Pretty much every Mills and Boon uses this type and he nearly always succumbs to her love in the end. That stuff is translated into damn near every language and culture on earth. It has universal appeal. And as I noted earlier when guys are in a couple and the more they're around their wife/gf, the more their testosterone drops, which will tend to make him more "domesticated".


    ** one might argue that this isn't that new a thing. Back in the day monasticism might have reflected this for many men. Also there were more men only avenues in life. We live in a much more unisex society these days.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,257 ✭✭✭Peist2007


    So, you're saying that the majority of men you know who are in relationships are dominated by the women in their lives, but you don't think this is an anti-female statement? Right....

    Also, your inference that I said all the men on this thread are women hating is completely inaccurate. I simply pulled you up on your use of generalizations and you clearly didn't like it.

    Overall, this thread is interesting, and maybe a little bit sad (in the true meaning of the word). I believe that some people are meant for a solitary lifestyle but others simply haven't found their match/find modern dating not for them and are clearly a bit lonely. Its human to defend whatever position you find yourself in, so I can understand some of the commentary.

    As I've mentioned in previous posts in this thread, I live with my boyfriend, no kids and to be best of my knowledge we're happy out. I do believe everyones personal circumstances influence their position on this subject.

    I think i would be pretty silly if i couldnt acknowledge that my comments werent generalisations. I do not personally know every man in Ireland.

    My ire at you isnt because you said i was generalising. I know i was. Your starting point "What is your status Peist" clearly indicated your take on it. "Ah he's single and bitter"

    Maybe if you listened to what was being said without jumping in with your own misconceptions from the outset, then we might have a worthwhile discussion.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,841 ✭✭✭SarahMollie


    This is it 100%. Marriages aren't a case of sitting back and taking it handy. You both continue to grow and change as individuals and you need to understand this. Above all things, communication is key. A lot of married people just stop communicating who they are to each and end up being ships that pass in the night to each other not knowing who the other person is. And you're going to fight. That's a given. And you're going to have to compromise. Both of you. I've been with my partner for 17 years, married for 12 and we've gone through fantastic highs and lows but I'm honestly happier now than I've ever been with her and the family that we have together but it's taken a lot of work to get to where we are and not taking the other for granted.

    +1

    This is some welcome balance to the posts about "every man i know in a relationship is henpecked by his wife/partner"

    Everyone changes over time and it takes work to grow together instead of apart. I think the trick is to work hard not to take your partner for granted and keep communication as a priority.

    When this doesn't happen, thats when all the above stories come into play unfortunately.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,343 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    OK folks let's dial this back. No need for anyone to have to go on the defensive.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,247 ✭✭✭Tigger99


    Yeah but why does there have to be balance Sarah Mollie? Its a thread about being a single guy in "The Gentlemans Club"? Why should they have to justify what they are experiencing? What you have said pisses me off as much as a bloke dismissing women's experience in a predominantly female forum.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,247 ✭✭✭Tigger99


    Whoops, in before the mod.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,257 ✭✭✭Peist2007


    Tigger99 wrote: »
    Yeah but why does there have to be balance Sarah Mollie? Its a thread about being a single guy in "The Gentlemans Club"? Why should they have to justify what they are experiencing? What you have said pisses me off as much as a bloke dismissing women's experience in a predominantly female forum.

    Sarah doesnt do irony


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,247 ✭✭✭Tigger99


    To be fair irony never translates well in text Peist :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,886 ✭✭✭✭ancapailldorcha


    Peist2007 wrote: »
    Sarah doesnt do irony

    There is no need for this. Final warning.

    The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

    Leviticus 19:34



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,990 ✭✭✭✭Lithium93_


    1 thing i've learned, it's that irony & sarcasm never translate well on the internet..


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,343 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    I have deleted off topic posts. No more. If you have any issue with this take it to PM

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,841 ✭✭✭SarahMollie


    There are a few more there Wibbs but however.

    I shall back out gracefully and let the men get back to discussing men things if they so wish :)


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,257 ✭✭✭Peist2007


    There are a few more there Wibbs but however.

    I shall back out gracefully and let the men get back to discussing men things if they so wish :)

    I am happy to discuss this further with you. Have you anything more to add than "you're saying this because you're single and bitter" ? Because that genuinely is not the case.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,841 ✭✭✭SarahMollie


    Peist2007 wrote: »
    I am happy to discuss this further with you. Have you anything more to add than "you're saying this because you're single and bitter" ? Because that genuinely is not the case.

    Can we hang on a moment then...because I didnt actually say that at any point, I just asked because I was interested. My impression is that your first post was very strongly weighted in one direction, and I just thought "whoh!" I assumed you probably were single, but thought I'd ask rather than make an assumption.

    FYI, i don't happen to believe that "Single" and "Single+Bitter" are one in the same.

    Play nice?


  • Posts: 7,344 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Also, not all relationships are like this. I dropped my BF to the pub last night and when he came home, he woke me up and we had a great natter before falling asleep. No ball and chain here :)

    That is the problem with anecdotes from a continuum. There will always - by pure probability alone - be people who's anecdotes bunch at one end rather than the other - and their opinion will be skewed by that. And perhaps people like Fukuyama and Peist2007 are a victim of that when "most of their mates" fit one particular dynamic.

    I think my own anecdotes - direct and vicarious - bunch at the other end of the scale. Myself and "most of my mates" have every bit as much - if not more - freedoms since entering into their relationships. With no "ball and chain" or "being dominated by their partner" mentalities at all. So my own inner narrative on relationships is skewed in the exact opposite direction to Fuku and Peist. I simply do not _personally_ recognise the world they describe.

    I suspect the reality is actually - as with many many things - somewhere in the middle and relationships of all these types exist in pretty equal quantities. I can do little more than be glad of which end of that continuum I lie on. No one in my relationship is "dominant" and we invest as much in our relationship life together as we do in our own personal lives and pursuits - and we are each supportive of that rather than a hindrance to it. I guess - as with most things - balance is key to everything.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,375 ✭✭✭✭kunst nugget


    Wibbs wrote: »
    Whinging for the sake of it. The "she never lets me out" another version of that. If they were single in the morning I'd bet the vast majority would find another excuse not to go out with "the lads".

    This is a big thing I think and I think a lot of Irish lads use this excuse. Rather than saying 'You know what, I haven't much money on me at the moment and the fact is I'd rather just veg out on the couch watching bilge on the TV and go to bed early than have to get out of my bean-stained pyjamas and make shíte small talk until I get drunk enough not to remember what I talked about and then spend the whole of the next day suffering from the fear...', they'll come out with the auld 'You know how it is lads, her indoors won't let me out!' chestnut. You end up making you and your spouse look like a bunch of sacks when you start spouting that shíte.

    And if your missus is really like that, you need to get some marriage counselling pronto.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,343 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    Everyone changes over time and it takes work to grow together instead of apart. I think the trick is to work hard not to take your partner for granted and keep communication as a priority.

    When this doesn't happen, thats when all the above stories come into play unfortunately.
    Oh certainly SM I would agree, however I think one thing is being missed here, that is some people just don't want that kind of life. Some men just don't want the wife and kids scenario. Some don't want the extended and close family gathered around the table at dinner vibe.

    For example the latter is my idea of hell. Well purgatory anyway :D Those Denny adverts with all the family make my toenails itch. It's just not me. Now I can see this is oddball and have no issue with admitting it. Indeed I spent much of my life trying to deny it and worse, fake it and am happier since I just accepted that I am odd*. Oh and I felt the same way when I was madly in love. Loved them, their family I could take or leave and only in very small doses. Hell, my own family would be in that category too.


    OK I'd be an outlier, but more and more men are choosing to not follow the script of their fathers. In cultures like the US it's a minor movement(though I can see why. IMH you'd want to be insane to get hitched in the US as you're much more likely to be screwed as a man if it goes south).

    Now of course some of these men might not have a choice. They're just not dating/marriage material as it were. In the old days maybe they would have joined a monastery or got stuck into academia? But I know men who most certainly have choices and they chose not to go down that road, or vow to wait until they're much older than their fathers were to get married and "settle down". Now most men do follow the script and are mostly grand, but enough don't. Enough to impact on the dating scene. Ask any single woman between the ages of 30 and 50 and they'll tell you how it's impacting.






    *aside; people who try to be different to be cool irritate the hell out of me. When you're actually different you try damned hard to fit in.

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 418 ✭✭Confucius say


    Ha Wibbs according to Irish TV adds our entire family and social lives are built around pork products. Ham sandwiches on the way to GAA games, bacon, sausages for the whole family etc.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,841 ✭✭✭SarahMollie


    Wibbs wrote: »
    Oh certainly SM I would agree, however I think one thing is being missed here, that is some people just don't want that kind of life. Some men just don't want the wife and kids scenario. Some don't want the extended and close family gathered around the table at dinner vibe.

    For example the latter is my idea of hell. Well purgatory anyway :D Those Denny adverts with all the family make my toenails itch. It's just not me. Now I can see this is oddball and have no issue with admitting it. Indeed I spent much of my life trying to deny it and worse, fake it and am happier since I just accepted that I am odd*. Oh and I felt the same way when I was madly in love. Loved them, their family I could take or leave and only in very small doses. Hell, my own family would be in that category too.


    OK I'd be an outlier, but more and more men are choosing to not follow the script of their fathers. In cultures like the US it's a minor movement(though I can see why. IMH you'd want to be insane to get hitched in the US as you're much more likely to be screwed as a man if it goes south).

    Now of course some of these men might not have a choice. They're just not dating/marriage material as it were. In the old days maybe they would have joined a monastery or got stuck into academia? But I know men who most certainly have choices and they chose not to go down that road, or vow to wait until they're much older than their fathers were to get married and "settle down". Now most men do follow the script and are mostly grand, but enough don't. Enough to impact on the dating scene. Ask any single woman between the ages of 30 and 50 and they'll tell you how it's impacting.






    *aside; people who try to be different to be cool irritate the hell out of me. When you're actually different you try damned hard to fit in.


    Oh yeah I agree, sure we're all individuals and one size certainly does not fit all :)

    You yourself sounds quite content, but i do think there have been other posts on here that have been a bit "the gentleman doth protest too much" aka women are all moany and relationships will ruin your life.

    The other thing that seemed a little off was that some of the posters are of the opinion that you can either be single or in an awful relationship which had to result in being married and having kids and living in suburbia. Lots of relationships don't conform to these norms anymore, so its not one of the other, its whatever works for the pair of you :) Or indeed whatever works for your good self if thats your choice :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,841 ✭✭✭SarahMollie


    Ha Wibbs according to Irish TV adds our entire family and social lives are built around pork products. Ham sandwiches on the way to GAA games, bacon, sausages for the whole family etc.

    Aren't they? ;)


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 418 ✭✭Confucius say


    So may as well put this out there. Met a girl last week and stuff happened, she's really cool and I'm very attracted to her. It was instant attraction from the moment I approached her in the bar, something I never do really, and before we knew it were in a taxi together. She has a 12 year old kid though that's with her half the week I think. So that would usually put me off.
    Plus side she has her own gaf and I'm soon to have mine and we've similar interests and we really seemed to get on so naturally, I mean I can't wait to see her again.
    Would a kid be a deal breaker for you guys? Would it be wrong to start a casual thing with her? Oh yeah I'm 35 and she's 37 if that matters.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,023 ✭✭✭Fukuyama


    Just to clarify, I wasn't referring to obvious relationship issues like controlling/abusive partners or lack of freedom.

    The only thing I'd say on that front is that generally it does seem to be men who (and not in just a small minority of cases) wind up downtrodden where nothing will be good enough to please her.

    My main qualm is that I feel like a lot of aspects of relationships aren't for me. Playing happy families for example. There's a lot of female posters in this thread. I wonder how many of their partners truly relish the thought of a weekend at the in-laws or similar.

    Again, maybe my feelings on this put me in a minority. But it doesn't appear to be a minority to me. I've had friends, colleagues, relatives and distant acquaintances all fall into similar situations. And of course none of them would vent about it the presence of women so this might be a subject that really only other men would hear about.

    I also wouldn't consider myself a "lad" so I don't think my viewpoint is being skewed by that particular mindset.

    Again, I'm not blaming women nor am I even remotely interested in yet another "gender issues" thread. Moreso venting and looking for perspective from people who may have encountered a similar take on relationships / dating in their 20s/30s.


  • Moderators, Science, Health & Environment Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 60,343 Mod ✭✭✭✭Wibbs


    i do think there have been other posts on here that have been a bit "the gentleman doth protest too much" aka women are all moany and relationships will ruin your life.
    Maybe that's been their experience? Now because I have women mates I very much get a balance, but if I was to go just on my long term relationships I'd have a very different slant. That slant would be rarely content neurotics with scattered craziness. I later came to realise I was picking this subset of women for some mad reason(my first "proper" girlfriend was a near stereotype and I followed that pattern I reckon) and the blame lay at my feet.

    The thing is quite a lot of men actually like that kind of woman. They like to feel a) superior and b) they can "fix" them.

    Others feel oddly at home with that kind of woman if their sainted mammy was of that sort. They're often the type who come out with "herself won't let me out" stuff. In my experience of women who were/are nags and browbeaters it's just as often because of the men. They abdicate all responsibility to the replacement "mammy" so the women take on that role(while resenting the man for having to).

    Many worry about Artificial Intelligence. I worry far more about Organic Idiocy.



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,841 ✭✭✭SarahMollie


    So may as well put this out there. Met a girl last week and stuff happened, she's really cool and I'm very attracted to her. It was instant attraction from the moment I approached her in the bar, something I never do really, and before we knew it were in a taxi together. She has a 12 year old kid though that's with her half the week I think. So that would usually put me off.
    Plus side she has her own gaf and I'm soon to have mine and we've similar interests and we really seemed to get on so naturally, I mean I can't wait to see her again.
    Would a kid be a deal breaker for you guys? Would it be wrong to start a casual thing with her? Oh yeah I'm 35 and she's 37 if that matters.

    Oh interesting....my instincts are that if you hit it off that you should go for it, especially if you're anything like me, and find sparking with someone to be a bit or a rare thing.

    Regarding the child issue, I do think that at your age its maybe unrealistic to limit yourself to people without children, although if you're extremely against it then maybe you're right to back out now.

    However the child is 12, and it sounds like custody is shared. I doubt you'd be expected to become a stand in parent, at least not any time soon.

    I think there is no harm in dating if you're open to all possibilities. You'd hardly be introduced to the child straight away. If you're only looking for a fling and no more, perhaps you should make sure you're on the same page and proceed with caution?


  • Posts: 7,344 ✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    Would a kid be a deal breaker for you guys? Would it be wrong to start a casual thing with her? Oh yeah I'm 35 and she's 37 if that matters.

    With a few extreme exceptions I do not see anything as a "deal breaker" per se. Rather every situation is a long set of equaliser sliders with many "ideal" combinations. So where one slides down or up - others can be slide down and up to compensate and find another ideal balance.

    So really only you can answer your own question. Look at the whole package - what you want from the relationship - the responsibilities and issues of the relationship - and the overall balance you end up with positive or negative - and decide yourself if it is a relationship you want to pursue.
    Fukuyama wrote: »
    The only thing I'd say on that front is that generally it does seem to be men who (and not in just a small minority of cases) wind up downtrodden where nothing will be good enough to please her.

    Then all I can do is repeat what I said above that I am glad this is not something I recognise in my life or in the lives of anyone I know. I know one of the hardest decisions in life is to end a relationship - especially a long term one - but I certainly would _myself_ not stay in a relationship that went down that road. And I would give a friend of mine any assistance I possibly could in getting out of one too if they ended up in one.

    But perhaps as I said it is merely anecdote bunching for you that you are seeing this - or some other reason you happen to be surrounded in people who have such anecdotes where I am not. I simply do not know. But I wonder if it is _as_ common as you think - or is this anecdote bunching skewing what you perceive (or what I perceive perhaps).

    I do feel for anyone in such a situation or "relationship" (if what you describe could even be called that) - and merely hope it isn't as common as you feel it to be.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,841 ✭✭✭SarahMollie


    Wibbs wrote: »
    Maybe that's been their experience? Now because I have women mates I very much get a balance, but if I was to go just on my long term relationships I'd have a very different slant. That slant would be rarely content neurotics with scattered craziness. I later came to realise I was picking this subset of women for some mad reason(my first "proper" girlfriend was a near stereotype and I followed that pattern I reckon) and the blame lay at my feet.

    The thing is quite a lot of men actually like that kind of woman. They like to feel a) superior and b) they can "fix" them.

    Others feel oddly at home with that kind of woman if their sainted mammy was of that sort. They're often the type who come out with "herself won't let me out" stuff. In my experience of women who were/are nags and browbeaters it's just as often because of the men. They abdicate all responsibility to the replacement "mammy" so the women take on that role(while resenting the man for having to).

    Your first point is very interesting - its like girls who always go for the bad boy and then are surprised when they get their hearts broken. Its the same with lads who go for a "livewire" and then it translates into crazy. The person choosing them all the time is the common denominator!

    I completely agree that some men secretly like this and just want another mammy. I can't get my head around it but I've definitely seen it! I know I'd go mad if my boyfriend suddenly started regressing into an infant.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,554 ✭✭✭Seanachai


    fits wrote: »
    "There's also a lot to be said for being able to "yeah" to an invite to the pub at 5.50 pm after work and just go. No need to text and say where you're going and no need to plan on being home at any time. I could go home at 6pm or 3am steaming drunk and fall into bed."

    I decided to go to dublin on saturday afternoon. I didnt contact my husband then until sunday lunchtime. Indeed i already spend weeks away from home at a time and we certainly dont track each others movements.

    I do wonder if some in this thread are trying to justify their solitary existence and reinforcing it with bad things they hear about. Its very human too. But for goodness sakes dont be blaming the horrible irish women for the worlds ills.

    ( oh and btw i never met anyone in a nightclub or pub)

    Your situation sounds healthy, I would say from my own experience that it's the exception to the rule though. I take people as they come, like I said I'm not damning all women or singling out Irish women. I've seen relatives and friends broken down in bad relationships, like the light has been sucked out of them, you want to take the person aside and shake them but you can't do that. Even if you could they would probably turn on you, I think a lot of what is called love is actually infatuation and dependency, people leave the family unit and almost straight away they need a substitute, it's a rare person that can spend long periods on their own.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,841 ✭✭✭SarahMollie


    Fukuyama wrote: »
    Just to clarify, I wasn't referring to obvious relationship issues like controlling/abusive partners or lack of freedom.

    The only thing I'd say on that front is that generally it does seem to be men who (and not in just a small minority of cases) wind up downtrodden where nothing will be good enough to please her.

    My main qualm is that I feel like a lot of aspects of relationships aren't for me. Playing happy families for example. There's a lot of female posters in this thread. I wonder how many of their partners truly relish the thought of a weekend at the in-laws or similar.

    Again, maybe my feelings on this put me in a minority. But it doesn't appear to be a minority to me. I've had friends, colleagues, relatives and distant acquaintances all fall into similar situations. And of course none of them would vent about it the presence of women so this might be a subject that really only other men would hear about.

    I also wouldn't consider myself a "lad" so I don't think my viewpoint is being skewed by that particular mindset.

    Again, I'm not blaming women nor am I even remotely interested in yet another "gender issues" thread. Moreso venting and looking for perspective from people who may have encountered a similar take on relationships / dating in their 20s/30s.

    Now I may have gotten the wrong end of the stick here, but something struck me about your posts. You're early 20's and likely most of your friends are too. Some of the negative relationship you've described seem a bit dramatic, and I probably recognize some of that stuff from my relationships at that age - everything was black or white, all or nothing, and a bit prone to dramatics. Thinking about it now it sounds exhausting.

    Anyhow, I digress. My question is, have you ever thought about dating someone older? Maybe by 5-10years? You might have a different experience


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 34,808 ✭✭✭✭smash


    Single life, from when I was in the situation:

    You meet an awful lot of insufferable assholes. Is it a disproportionate amount to the general population? No, absolutely not but it just seems that way because you're actively looking for something so you're actively approaching them.

    It is the exact same as being a sales person, and a lot of people wont like your product. Nothing to take personally if you look at it that way.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,554 ✭✭✭Seanachai


    Oh yeah I agree, sure we're all individuals and one size certainly does not fit all :)

    You yourself sounds quite content, but i do think there have been other posts on here that have been a bit "the gentleman doth protest too much" aka women are all moany and relationships will ruin your life.

    The other thing that seemed a little off was that some of the posters are of the opinion that you can either be single or in an awful relationship which had to result in being married and having kids and living in suburbia. Lots of relationships don't conform to these norms anymore, so its not one of the other, its whatever works for the pair of you :) Or indeed whatever works for your good self if thats your choice :)

    Just for the record I'm well aware that you can be suffocated in a relationship with kids or no kids, married or not married, living a conventional lifestyle or as a bohemian. I won't be in that situation myself but it's frustrating seeing your brother or friend being put through the ringer, you could argue that it's their own fault but it's still not nice to watch.


Advertisement
Advertisement