Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Why should a man offer a seat to a woman on train/bus?

18911131420

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,693 ✭✭✭DellyBelly


    I was raised by my parents to give up my seat to old, disabled or mentally ill people and women. It's something I do now without even thinking. The only issue I do havei s what age is old. I personallyt honk anyone over 45 is old but it's hard to judge ages and I'd be afraid sometimes I might offend someone.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 23,646 ✭✭✭✭qo2cj1dsne8y4k


    Other kerrazzee stuff I do that has no real meaning, beyond being courteous, and that is gender and age specific (as in I might not do these for a young man).

    I will hold an umbrella.

    I will walk on the outside of the footpath.

    And so on.

    It never crossed my mind that I was being sexist, ageist etc.


    You sound lovely. I don't think you'd be coming across as anything else to be honest.

    When we go to tesco, he carries the basket and the bags.
    He's the big spoon.
    He changes tyres/puts oil in the car.
    He mows the lawn.
    He sets mousetraps and fixes things that need fixing around the house.
    He would make sure I'm ok and organised before he makes sure he is.
    And I'm quite glad he's happy enough to do all that. I would never in a million years expect a man to give me a seat, and would decline if offered, but I would think that the guy was lovely. So, I'm stumped as to how a gesture can leave so many women raging.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,653 ✭✭✭✭amdublin


    PLL wrote: »
    I'd rather pay for my 4 year than ever put her on my lap. It is dangerous and terrifies her.
    Add this to the fact I have a back injury and I can assure you my 4 year old will not be giving up her seat for an able bodied adult.

    Never mind women, the buses I use, workers in their 20's let old men stand, and laugh when they fall. They also don't move out of the buggy space for ladies with buggies.

    Your gripe with men not giving up seats for women is arbitrary compared to what actually happens.

    Putting your child on your lap where you can hold on to the is dangerous???? I would have thought unrestrained on the seat beside would be more dangerous?
    And it terrifies her? You're going to have to explain that one please.

    Any hoo as long as you pay full carriage so when I ask you to move her you can show me the ticket. You don't pay for her I'll be asking you to take her on to your lap thanks very much.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,119 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    amdublin wrote: »
    Putting your child on your lap where you can hold on to the is dangerous???? I would have thought unrestrained on the seat beside would be more dangerous?
    And it terrifies her? You're going to have to explain that one please.

    Any hoo as long as you pay full carriage so when I ask you to move her you can show me the ticket. You don't pay for her I'll be asking you to take her on to your lap thanks very much.


    If anyone were to try that with me over my child, I'd simply tell them no first, and if they insisted, I'd tell them go complain to the bus driver. Hand luggage you might have a point, but a child is not hand luggage. I wouldn't even bother offering you my own seat if you came at me with that attitude demanding to see my child's ticket. I wouldn't be able to take you seriously.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,885 ✭✭✭DeanAustin


    It's about treating people equally. You can't treat people equally if you're giving one gender preferential treatment.

    Equality is the name of the game now. Unequal treatment of one gender is from a bygone era. Maybe unequal treatment of the genders will come back to into vogue, but right now it's just about equal treatment.

    Resourceful people can adapt to the times. Those who can't keep up get left behind, however well intentioned they might be.

    Let's just agree to disagree.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,555 ✭✭✭Ave Sodalis


    everlast75 wrote:
    I note however others (including Candie) have responded on my behalf and hit the nail on the head.

    But although Candie had agreeable posts, they weren't entirely relevant because I was under the impression thia was about offering women and women alone a seat, not offering everyone a seat.
    DeanAustin wrote:
    If you live your life in a world devoid of illogical acts, you'll live in a pretty dull world.

    Ah come off it. There's nothing wrong with disagreeing and not wanting to partake in things that are completely pointless.
    Cork Lass wrote:
    This thread has really got me thinking. Do some people just get offended for the sake of it? I have been offered seats on a bus and have either accepted or refused as I saw fit - I've never been offended by it and I hope that those people I've offered a seat to have not been offended by me. I love when someone holds a door open for me and always make sure to thank them, I will also hold a door for someone behind me be they male or female. I think people do this out of politeness and nothing else. My husband would always offer his seat to a woman, he's a polite person and not a sexist. To those women who are offended by being offered a seat by a man answer me this - would you be as offended if he was offering you the last place on a lifeboat or would you be willing to sink ? There are lots of real problems in the world that we can get our feminist panties in a twist over but this to my mind is not one of them.

    But same as the first post, are we not talking about giving up a seat to women only and not men? Again, there is a difference between someone holding a door they are already at, and offering a seat to a woman solely because of her gender.
    Other kerrazzee stuff I do that has no real meaning, beyond being courteous, and that is gender and age specific (as in I might not do these for a young man).

    Ah but could you really consider yourself courteous if you pick and choose who you are courteous to?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 25,119 ✭✭✭✭One eyed Jack


    It's about treating people equally. You can't treat people equally if you're giving one gender preferential treatment.

    Equality is the name of the game now. Unequal treatment of one gender is from a bygone era. Maybe unequal treatment of the genders will come back to into vogue, but right now it's just about equal treatment.

    Resourceful people can adapt to the times. Those who can't keep up get left behind, however well intentioned they might be.


    There's your problem right there. You think everyone else should concern themselves with your notions of 'gender equality', and I don't know where you get the notion that you're adapting to any 'times', when your notions about 'gender equality' are squarely in a minority, and of little interest to most people.

    The problem for you is that 'gender equality' is in vogue, and next week there's going to be another bandwagon for you to jump on, while the rest of us carry on about our daily lives, and you complain because people don't adopt your way of thinking.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,521 ✭✭✭✭everlast75


    Look, at the risk of repeating myself.

    I was brought up to think it's a nice thing to do.

    I've continued to do it because, on balance, I don't see anything wrong with it, I don't mind standing, it doesn't hurt anyone and I just might make someone happy by doing it.

    I don't make a huge deal of it - I don't bow over, point to the seat with one arm and make a sweeping gesture with the other so as to draw attention to my "noble/sexist" deed. No one gets embarrased. It's usually eye contact and maybe a pointing to the seat..

    Maybe I do feel good about being polite. Ye can be cynical and say that's why I do it and that is selfish. People who say "there's no such thing as a selfless act" generally use that as a reason to feel better about acting like a dick, so like those who get offended by a nice act, I leave them to it.

    Elect a clown... Expect a circus



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,515 ✭✭✭zeffabelli


    Having read this thread, I have come to an official position of detesting egalitarianism.

    It is a petty, superficial, anti sex, chip on the shoulder whinge festival for immature individuals who'd rather keep little accounting books of their victimisations and micro aggressions rather than actually do the work to change their lives.

    I like courtesies and gestures of respect,the egalitarian would rail at me for offering a seat to the elderly because it's ageist. Give me a break. Take your hat off when you enter a building, walk on the outside of the sidewalk, what is the god dsmned big deal?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,515 ✭✭✭zeffabelli


    And by the way ....

    Just so you know...

    The reason these courtesies are under attack is because of a left wing feminist interpretation...

    That they are the male display of dominance...articulating your penis wielding oppressive forces in the detail of everyday life...

    So when you fall for it you are consenting to a feminist reading of dominance and dominance is the new moral no no in the egalitarian circus of victim status trophy chasing.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,634 ✭✭✭ThinkProgress


    I think it's best to judge each situation on its own merits. Rather than applying blanket rules to all social situations.

    The word 'equality' gets thrown around a lot on these issues. Most of us think we know what that means, but unfortunately some people choose to adopt an extremely hardline interpretation of that word...

    So hardline in fact, that they might even feel justified getting upset and angry by some good natured, well intentioned gesture... Which seems bonkers to me!

    If we all lived in their vision of the world, men would not give ANY thought or consideration to the subtle differences between genders.

    Because wether you like to admit this or not, thinking that a certain woman might benefit more from having your seat in that particular instance... That is part of a larger culture of consideration that (thankfully) still exists between many of us!

    If you don't want or need the seat, then politely decline it. But please also try to see the bigger picture here... (Hint: it's not totally about the seat) ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,555 ✭✭✭Ave Sodalis


    Again with the feminist word being thrown around! Jaysus.

    I'm against giving a woman a seat just because she is a woman. It does not (I repeat, does not) make me some crazy feminist person. It means people doing pointless sh*te for the sake of doing pointless sh*te annoys me. I don't see giving up a seat for a woman to be polite. I see it as a pointless waste of energy and time. Same with taking off hats, running to open doors, using cutlery from the outside in etc. But then, from the sounds of this thread, I'm some sort of mannerless gowl who was brought up in a hedge. I would give me seat to whoever needs it. I would open a door I am at for whoever is behind me or directly in front of me. I would carry the shopping bag for whoever can't. If I was meeting someone on a narrow road, I would pull in. I will say please and thank you. To me, these are manners. Not getting up on public transport because there's a woman standing. Not taking a hat off indoors. Not refusing sit until all the females at the table are sitting. Not running half way across the room to open a door for someone who can open it themselves. This doesn't make me some sort of feminazi, or whatever else. It makes me intolerant to pointless crap.

    Your first post was somewhat agreeable. This post is more hysterical than any of the posts it is giving out about...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,295 ✭✭✭FortySeven


    FFS. Is it any wonder our children walk around with their hoods up and headphones in? What a complicated world we have created for them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,555 ✭✭✭Ave Sodalis


    FortySeven wrote:
    FFS. Is it any wonder our children walk around with their hoods up and headphones in? What a complicated world we have created for them.


    I think the old ways are far more complicated. Now it's simply give your seat to who needs it. It seems people are lamenting giving your seat to these certain people that it doesn't make sense to give it to because it's their own version of manners, otherwise they get offended if you don't do it or can't see the reason behind why they do.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,515 ✭✭✭zeffabelli


    sup_dude wrote: »
    Again with the feminist word being thrown around! Jaysus.

    I'm against giving a woman a seat just because she is a woman. It does not (I repeat, does not) make me some crazy feminist person. It means people doing pointless sh*te for the sake of doing pointless sh*te annoys me. I don't see giving up a seat for a woman to be polite. I see it as a pointless waste of energy and time. Same with taking off hats, running to open doors, using cutlery from the outside in etc. But then, from the sounds of this thread, I'm some sort of mannerless gowl who was brought up in a hedge. I would give me seat to whoever needs it. I would open a door I am at for whoever is behind me or directly in front of me. I would carry the shopping bag for whoever can't. If I was meeting someone on a narrow road, I would pull in. I will say please and thank you. To me, these are manners. Not getting up on public transport because there's a woman standing. Not taking a hat off indoors. Not refusing sit until all the females at the table are sitting. Not running half way across the room to open a door for someone who can open it themselves. This doesn't make me some sort of feminazi, or whatever else. It makes me intolerant to pointless crap.

    Your first post was somewhat agreeable. This post is more hysterical than any of the posts it is giving out about...

    Well you can do that, but it will be noted.

    You may think it's pointless but they signify that you can oblige protocols.

    And they do matter in certain contexts or you will be marked as uncouth.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,555 ✭✭✭Ave Sodalis


    zeffabelli wrote:
    Well you can do that, but it will be noted.


    You may think it's pointless but they signify that you can oblige protocols.


    And they do matter in certain contexts or you will be marked as uncouth.

    Should you oblige pointless protocols? I strongly disagree.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,707 ✭✭✭whatismyname


    Cork Lass wrote: »
    This thread has really got me thinking. Do some people just get offended for the sake of it?

    In my experience, most times that people say others are just getting offended for the sake of it, the other person isn't even offended at all, and it's nothing about offence.

    And some people just have different opinions and perspectives than others, and that's ok.

    I also believe that it's good for people to try to understand other people's perspectives (and with the other person doing the same back), but if we just shut down their perspective by saying they're offended, when usually that's not what it's about at all, then we're potentially missing out on something important. Even more so, when people then just shut down the opportunity to understand another's perspective by saying that the person is just getting offended for the sake of it.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,796 ✭✭✭Azalea


    zeffabelli wrote: »
    Having read this thread, I have come to an official position of detesting egalitarianism.

    It is a petty, superficial, anti sex, chip on the shoulder whinge festival for immature individuals who'd rather keep little accounting books of their victimisations and micro aggressions rather than actually do the work to change their lives.

    I like courtesies and gestures of respect,the egalitarian would rail at me for offering a seat to the elderly because it's ageist. Give me a break. Take your hat off when you enter a building, walk on the outside of the sidewalk, what is the god dsmned big deal?
    zeffabelli wrote: »
    And by the way ....

    Just so you know...

    The reason these courtesies are under attack is because of a left wing feminist interpretation...

    That they are the male display of dominance...articulating your penis wielding oppressive forces in the detail of everyday life...

    So when you fall for it you are consenting to a feminist reading of dominance and dominance is the new moral no no in the egalitarian circus of victim status trophy chasing.
    One person, Katydid, said it's insulting to women. ONE person. sup_dude finds it stupid and pointless, but not for feminist reasons. The rest of the people criticising men getting up to offer their seat to women are men or women questioning why they're treating women with more consideration than men - i.e. they're defending men, so it's hardly "feminism".
    But don't let facts get in the way of your obsessive quest to pretend that you're being oppressed into the ground non stop by PC, and to look a wee bit controversial.

    There were some fairly misogynistic posts about "women" full stop - any possibility of you criticising those?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,940 ✭✭✭shootermacg


    I often run on the inside of the footpath. Since the advent of feminism, foolish women should know that simple physics apply, my superior size and strength will always win out! MOVE OUT OF MY WAY OR YES, IT WILL LEAVE A MARK!:D:D:D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,515 ✭✭✭zeffabelli


    Azalea wrote: »
    One person, Katydid, said it's insulting to women. ONE person. sup_dude finds it stupid and pointless, but not for feminist reasons. The rest of the people criticising men getting up to offer their seat to women are men or women questioning why they're treating women with more consideration than men - i.e. they're defending men, so it's hardly "feminism".
    But don't let facts get in the way of your obsessive quest to pretend that you're being oppressed into the ground non stop by PC, and to look a wee bit controversial.

    There were some fairly misogynistic posts about "women" full stop - any possibility of you criticising those?

    I'm not claiming to be oppressed darling.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,707 ✭✭✭whatismyname


    DellyBelly wrote: »
    I was raised by my parents to give up my seat to old, disabled or mentally ill people and women. It's something I do now without even thinking.

    How could you tell someone is mentally ill just by looking at them?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 176 ✭✭Canterelle


    I don't know if you're missing the point on purpose or not so I'll try to explain. It's about treating people equally. You're not the biggest arźeholes on the planet, but it's not treating people equally.

    If you can't get your head around the concept of treating the genders equally, then I don't know what to tell you.
    . Oh do. Do go on banging that drum zealously and fervently. spread the word to us morons who cannot grasp the concept of gender equality. I can imagine you policing the buses and watching out for all this equality bashing behaviour.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,555 ✭✭✭Ave Sodalis


    Canterelle wrote:
    . Oh do. Do go on banging that drum zealously and fervently. spread the word to us morons who cannot grasp the concept of gender equality. I can imagine you policing the buses and watching out for all this equality bashing behaviour.

    This post just furthers the concept that those who believe men should stand up for women are being far more hysterical on the whole than those who believe they shouldn't.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,515 ✭✭✭zeffabelli


    sup_dude wrote: »
    This post just furthers the concept that those who believe men should stand up for women are being far more hysterical on the whole than those who believe they shouldn't.

    Who is telling them they should?

    It's more a case of not raining against them if they do.

    I don't think in my life I've ever seen a man do this, bar for the elderly.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,796 ✭✭✭Azalea


    zeffabelli wrote: »
    I'm not claiming to be oppressed darling.
    Good. You'll retract your lies about all the hardline feminism on this thread and admit you were just trying to be a bit controversial in due course I assume.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,153 ✭✭✭✭anewme


    DellyBelly wrote: »
    I was raised by my parents to give up my seat to old, disabled or mentally ill people and women. It's something I do now without even thinking. The only issue I do havei s what age is old. I personallyt honk anyone over 45 is old but it's hard to judge ages and I'd be afraid sometimes I might offend someone.

    I've just celebrated my 46th birthday last week. Now I must apply for my hidden hearing aid and Zimmer frame.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,555 ✭✭✭Ave Sodalis


    zeffabelli wrote:
    Who is telling them they should?


    If you read the thread, those who do had it drilled into them by their parents. They're essentially just doing something because they were told to, not because it makes sense to.

    I've never seen it either.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 189 ✭✭Woodbrook80


    I'm 5 months pregnant now I rarely get offered a seat on the luas same thing happened on dart when I took it couple weeks back
    I know the luas is but would be nice to be offered at least


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,653 ✭✭✭✭amdublin


    If anyone were to try that with me over my child, I'd simply tell them no first, and if they insisted, I'd tell them go complain to the bus driver. Hand luggage you might have a point, but a child is not hand luggage. I wouldn't even bother offering you my own seat if you came at me with that attitude demanding to see my child's ticket. I wouldn't be able to take you seriously.

    I think you will find the driver has the same opinion as me. If you don't have a ticket for your child, under the terms and conditions of carriage the child must travel on the lap of a full fare paying adult. If you want your child to have a seat you must buy them a ticket.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,055 ✭✭✭snickerpuss


    Wow all this time I've been sitting on the top deck of the bus unaware of the tense seat situation going on downstairs.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement