Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Waterford GAA Discussion Thread 3 ***Updated Mod Note Post 1***

1107108110112113338

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 36 On the Ball Boy


    With all respect to Tony Browne, when we won the U-21 Munster titles in 1992 and 1994 the Senior team had been beaten in the championship and their year was over before the U-21 had started, no back door then. it was a little easier to concentrate on the u-21 championship when its the only one you have left to play for. I agree with the posters about this years U-21, it was a monumental disaster, we could have had Limerick in a munster final in Walsh Park and be heading into an all ireland semi if we had gotten over that Clare team.We do have a small pick, and thats why when a good generation of underage talent comes along we have to make the most of them and win everything you can. Make hay while the sun shines, this year is definitely a missed opportunity at U-21 .


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 281 ✭✭archieknox


    With all respect to Tony Browne, when we won the U-21 Munster titles in 1992 and 1994 the Senior team had been beaten in the championship and their year was over before the U-21 had started, no back door then. it was a little easier to concentrate on the u-21 championship when its the only one you have left to play for. I agree with the posters about this years U-21, it was a monumental disaster, we could have had Limerick in a munster final in Walsh Park and be heading into an all ireland semi if we had gotten over that Clare team.We do have a small pick, and thats why when a good generation of underage talent comes along we have to make the most of them and win everything you can. Make hay while the sun shines, this year is definitely a missed opportunity at U-21 .

    Led to believe the same management set up are looking for the job again next yr and believe they did nothing wrong.
    Pity the proven combination that have several hurling titles under their belts mightn't get a look in and are interested in the job. Maybe Ballyhale mightn't want to see them leave!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 429 ✭✭blueflame


    Just a reminder for those interested the Tony Forristal and Sonny Walsh U 14 Tournaments take place in the city next Saturday - it is played across five venues this year Erin's Own, St. Saviours, Mount Sion, De La Salle and Walsh Park,.

    Fixtures are as follows

    TONY FORRISTAL TROPHY
    Venue: Mount Sion
    Group A - Clare, Antrim, Dublin Group B - Limerick, Waterford, Galway
    Time
    10.00 Clare V Antrim
    10.50 Limerick V Waterford
    11.40 Clare V Dublin
    12.30 Limerick V Galway
    13.20 Antrim V Dublin
    14.10 Waterford V Galway
    15.50 Div 1 Semi Final Winners Group A V Winners Group B
    Venue: St Saviours
    Group C - Cork, Tipperary, Offaly Group D - Laois, Kilkenny, Wexford
    Time
    10.00 Cork V Tipperary
    10.50 Laois V Kilkenny
    11.40 Offaly V Cork
    12.30 Laois V Wexford
    13.20 Tipperary V Offaly
    14.10 Kilkenny V Wexford
    15.50 Div 1 Semi Final Winners Group C V Winners Group D
    SONNY WALSH TROPHY
    Venue: De La Salle, Gracedieu
    Group A - Waterford, Limerick, Kerry, Cork
    Time
    10.00 Waterford V Limerick
    10.50 Kerry V Cork
    12.20 Waterford V Kerry
    13.10 Limerick V Cork
    14.40 Waterford V Cork
    15.40 Limerick V Kerry
    Top Team straight to the final

    Venue: Erins Own, Poleberry Division 2
    Group B - Kilkenny, Dublin, Clare
    Time Score
    10.00 Kilkenny V Dublin
    11.40 Clare V Dublin
    13.20 Kilkenny V Clare

    15.40 Division 2 Semi final Winners Group B V Winners Group C

    Venue: Walsh Park Division 2
    Group C - Wexford, Tipperary, Galway
    Time Score
    10.00 Wexford V Tipperary
    11.40 Galway V Tipperary
    13.20 Wexford V Galway
    17.40 Division 2 Final
    18.45 Division 1 Final


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 602 ✭✭✭Giveitfong


    I am surprised that there has been no mention here of the Waterford camogie team's great victory last Saturday in the All-Ireland intermediate championship semi-final against Meath. Although Waterford would have been favourites here, having won Division 2 of the National League earlier in the year, they found themselves eight points behind at half time, 3-4 to 0-5. However, a three-goal burst midway through the second half put them in the driving seat, although they had to withstand a late Meath comeback to edge the game by one point, 3-10 to 3-9.

    This means we will have at least one Waterford team in an All-Ireland final at Croke Park this year, with Kildare the opposition on September 13. Kildare beat Cork's second team by 1-12 to 0-11 in the other semi-final. As far as I am aware, the winner of this competition qualify for promotion to next year's senior championship, which would be a great boost for the game (and hurling in general) in the county. Also as far as I am aware, Waterford have not played at the top level since the early 1960s.

    We could have a second county team playing in Croke Park in September as the Ladies Gaelic Footballers play Leitrim in the Intermediate semi-final next Saturday (TG4, 4pm) with the winner playing in the All-Ireland final in Croker on September 27. It would be great to see Waterford competing again at senior level, where they dominated in the 1990s, winning five All-Ireland titles.

    So still a lot left to look forward to from genuine supporters of Gaelic games in the Déise.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 969 ✭✭✭cul beag


    archieknox wrote: »
    Led to believe the same management set up are looking for the job again next yr and believe they did nothing wrong.
    Pity the proven combination that have several hurling titles under their belts mightn't get a look in and are interested in the job. Maybe Ballyhale mightn't want to see them leave!!

    I hope what you are saying is not true Archie. They surely cannot appoint Lyons again he is a complete and utter spoofer. A football man all his life what in gods name does he know about hurling? But to listen to him you would think he invented the game. I would keep Tony Browne as a selector and throw out the other two. From what I can see Mullane's fire and brimstone tactics are outdated.
    I just hope Paddy Joe Ryan sees sense here and does the right thing. If what you are saying is true then give the job to those two if they want it. They have a far better successful CV.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,851 ✭✭✭Mountainlad


    If Moloney and Bonner are going then they would be the best option. Doubt you'll be able to fire a manager and pick and choose selectors. All or nothing I reckon.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,894 ✭✭✭Cake Man


    The u16 Arrabawn and u15 tournament also on this weekend. Anyone know of any teams or even what players on each are meant to be handy?
    There's surely one or two sons of former players at this grade by now!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 739 ✭✭✭robopaddy2


    Cake Man wrote: »
    The u16 Arrabawn and u15 tournament also on this weekend. Anyone know of any teams or even what players on each are meant to be handy?
    There's surely one or two sons of former players at this grade by now!


    Not particularly strong in either grade to be honest. Couple of promising lads at u16 Tom Douglas (DLS ) and Sean Murray (Dungarvan) are the pick of the bunch but as a collective unit were not that strong in comparison to the levels of previous years.

    Hope the Tony Forristal lads will be competitive. Between 04' and 2012 we contested 7 out of 9 finals in this grade so its no coincidence that weve had some quality players come through to senior level the last couple of years. Hopefully the conveyor belt will continue to roll.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 354 ✭✭3ships


    The squad sheets for the weekend

    http://www.waterfordgaa.ie/taggedNews/364701/2119/hurling_development_squad_tournaments

    I'd give them all a chance of getting out of their groups. Cork seem to be the stand out U-16 team judging by last two years and inter divisional tournament this year. Waterford again will be facing a trip to Tipp.

    U-15 hard to know. Kilkenny ran away with the Tony Forristal last year beating Galway in the final. This is a Munster only Competition.

    The Tony Forristal team would be capable but Galway and Limerick are as good as any under age so we'll see.

    TG4 will have cameras at the U-16 and U-14 finals

    Always a good day of hurling

    Best of Luck to all teams


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 296 ✭✭Alf Tupper


    3ships wrote: »
    The squad sheets for the weekend

    http://www.waterfordgaa.ie/taggedNews/364701/2119/hurling_development_squad_tournaments

    I'd give them all a chance of getting out of their groups. Cork seem to be the stand out U-16 team judging by last two years and inter divisional tournament this year. Waterford again will be facing a trip to Tipp.

    U-15 hard to know. Kilkenny ran away with the Tony Forristal last year beating Galway in the final. This is a Munster only Competition.

    The Tony Forristal team would be capable but Galway and Limerick are as good as any under age so we'll see.

    TG4 will have cameras at the U-16 and U-14 finals

    Always a good day of hurling

    Best of Luck to all teams

    Best of luck to all of the young lads this weekend.

    It's great to see this year that the Sonny Walsh panel is representative of clubs from all over the county.

    In the past few years you would get the impression that the panel was cobbled together as an afterthought.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 497 ✭✭The blue blaa


    Cake Man wrote: »
    The u16 Arrabawn and u15 tournament also on this weekend. Anyone know of any teams or even what players on each are meant to be handy?
    There's surely one or two sons of former players at this grade by now!

    The standout players from U16 A team
    Thomas Tonto Douglas (DLS)
    Donal Carey (DLS)
    Tom Barron (Fourmilewater)
    Tiernan O'Connell (St Olivers)
    Billy Power (Clonea)
    Shaun Murray (DG)

    The Standout players from U16 B team
    Tom Looby (Abbeyside)
    Brendan Cullinane (DG)
    Luke Flynn (DLS)
    Evan McGrath (MS)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 173 ✭✭Waternut


    Is Crotty from Dungarvan injured? Himself, Douglas and Barron are the the one's to look out for in the U16 age group. Past results seem to indicate that this is not the strongest age group but the above three appear to be good prospects.

    I haven't seen any of the U14 but will be interesting to see how they get along. They are in a tough group. Hopefully a few up and coming talented players coming through from that age group too.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,894 ✭✭✭Cake Man


    Happy to hear of any score updates in today's underage games if anyone hears. Ht in sonny Walsh wfd 2-2 Lk 0-6


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,894 ✭✭✭Cake Man


    Sonny Walsh ft wfd 2-6 Lk 1-7 good start.

    Our u16s up by a few pts v Tipp nearly ht


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,894 ✭✭✭Cake Man


    Mixed bag of results so far. U16s beaten by Tipp and currently playing Wex but can't advance to the semi final due to Tipp winning their two games.
    U15s as far as I know did poor, beaten 2-15 to 0-4 by Cork.
    U16b team comfortably beaten by Tipp.

    U14s Tony Forristal and Sonny Walsh teams doing well tho, TF play a decider v Galway to determine who goes thru to the semis.
    SW scraped a 1pt win over Kerry to lead the group, should they avoid defeat v Cork they'll advance to the semis as well.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 739 ✭✭✭robopaddy2


    Cake Man wrote: »
    Mixed bag of results so far. U16s beaten by Tipp and currently playing Wex but can't advance to the semi final due to Tipp winning their two games.
    U15s as far as I know did poor, beaten 2-15 to 0-4 by Cork.
    U16b team comfortably beaten by Tipp.

    U14s Tony Forristal and Sonny Walsh teams doing well tho, TF play a decider v Galway to determine who goes thru to the semis.
    SW scraped a 1pt win over Kerry to lead the group, should they avoid defeat v Cork they'll advance to the semis as well.

    U16s and 15s as expected not good enough. Our prospects for minor grade in 2 years time arent great its fair to say. Good win for the forristal boys against limerick but galway beat limk by a lot more than we did so a big ask for our lads to get through to semis.
    U15bs are through to a final though so hopefully we can get some silverware there at least


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,894 ✭✭✭Cake Man


    robopaddy2 wrote: »
    U16s and 15s as expected not good enough. Our prospects for minor grade in 2 years time arent great its fair to say. Good win for the forristal boys against limerick but galway beat limk by a lot more than we did so a big ask for our lads to get through to semis.
    U15bs are through to a final though so hopefully we can get some silverware there at least

    0-7 to 0-1 down to Galwayin the TF and down 0-12 to 0-1 in the SW - that should be that.
    Yeah I'm not too surprised our u15s and 16s haven't done much as we weren't great at TF level the last 2/3 years (could count this year as well I suppose).
    Doesn't bode too well for minor in the next few years, Cork and Tipp as usual seem to be the pace setters.

    I know these tournaments are just a bit of a showcase and the idea is to dig out a few decent prospects but it's no surprise our previous strong minor teams the last few years came off the back of strong showings in these competitions, including winning a few of them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 403 ✭✭carter10


    U16 A Waterford 1-9 Wexford 4-8 FT


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,231 ✭✭✭seananigans


    here lads ,any idea when this yearskit will go on sale, being the second year you would assume it owuld happen by now but still not on sale


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 739 ✭✭✭robopaddy2


    Managed to get to u16a games as had a few club lads involved. Reasonly competitive. Put up a decent showing against a strong looking tipp side. Performed poorly against wexford conceding 4 goals in the second game albeit nothing to play for as Tipp were already through. A few standout performers at least.
    The Tony Forristal lads got a hard group by the looks of it. The u15s apparantly well off the pace.

    Anyone know whos taking over the minors next year? Should have a decent group.
    but Id fear after that were in for a few lean years at underage level again. Looking at how our development and colleges sides have performed the last couple years were headed for a bit of a lull, after being strong over the past 7/8 years. These things come in peaks and troughs i suppose. The financial debacle of the co board a few years back is starting to show a bit now as there was a cutback in resources for grassroots level for a while. and the lads coming up at u14 or u16 level now didnt get the same quality of coaching or nurturing as maybe the lads 2 or 3 years older than them would have. All we can do is just hope we can remain competitive and keep the quality coming through. Its very competitive between many of the counties at unde4age level so lack of success dosent necessarily mean were on the wrong path.

    Looks like cork are coming back strong aswell judging by yesterday. Talk of their demise is overstated imo


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 602 ✭✭✭Giveitfong


    I have been looking in some detail at the Waterford v Kilkenny All-Ireland semi-final, and my findings are set out below. Although analysis of these games involves a lot more than just play statistics, the latter do tell a lot, in my view.

    Kilkenny dominated the game in almost all areas. They had 166 possessions (ball in hand) to Waterford’s 144. They used a higher proportion of these possessions to the team’s advantage (63% to 59%). They had a higher number of other plays (hooks, blocks, tackles, ground strokes, knockdowns, etc.) – 38 to Waterford’s 33. They had 39 shots for scores (including frees) to Waterford’s 32, although Waterford actually had a higher success rate with their shots (78% to 74%).

    Kilkenny had four shots for a goal during the game but only scored one. Waterford had no shot for a goal. One of Kilkenny’s shots for goal hit Shane Fives on the leg while he was looking the other way. Ger Aylward missed a sitter. TJ Reid’s screamer went inches wide of the post. Kilkenny also hit four bad wides to Waterford’s two. They could well have won this game by 13 or 14 points.

    A key factor accounting for Kilkenny’s superior possession count was their ability to hoover up breaking and loose ball around the field, and especially in the middle third where Cillian Buckley, Michael Fennelly and Richie Hogan were particularly prominent in this facet of play. All told, I counted 49 instances of Kilkenny picking up loose/breaking ball against just 30 for Waterford.

    All the evidence suggests that Waterford were not mentally well prepared for this game. This was reflected in poor ball control, poor decision-making and poor striking (especially striking for scores). I counted 54 Waterford errors compared to just 14 for Kilkenny. The main error categories were poor ball control (17), poor decision-making (12) and poor striking (12). The most obvious case of poor decision-making was Barry Coughlan’s decision to challenge for a ball already covered by Tadhg de Búrca which led to TJ Reid’s 17th minute goal. Poor striking (and lack of conviction) was particularly apparent in the number of Waterford shots which fell short – eight in all compared with four for Kilkenny.

    Another feature of the game which has been much commented on is the number of long balls (apart from shots which fell short) Waterford sent into the Kilkenny goal area – 21 in all . Kilkenny played 11 balls of this type. Although Kilkenny always had an extra man under the long balls sent towards their goal, Waterford actually got possession from 10 of them, leading to seven scores. Kilkenny only won four of the 11 long balls sent into the Waterford goal, and these yielded just one score – TJ Reid’s goal.

    A distinctive feature of Waterford’s play throughout the year has been the use of stick passing to move to ball out of defence and create attacking platforms. This tactic was notably absent in this game, with Waterford hitting just 14 passes of this type (excluding short passes) compared with twice that number for Kilkenny. To an extent this could be put down to tight marking by Kilkenny players. At the same time I detected 18 clear cases where Waterford had available passing options but elected instead to hit the ball long (and frequently blind). Kilkenny were much less inclined to hit blind long balls, choosing instead to hold onto the ball and look for better options. In particular, Kilkenny were more inclined to look across field for such options – a sign, no doubt, of their greater experience.

    Waterford also had problems with their puckouts. Whereas Kilkenny won 63% of their puckouts, Waterford only won 52% of theirs. If one excludes short puckouts (each team played six of these), Kilkenny won 59% of Waterford’s long puckouts and 52% of their own. In the first half, Waterford’s puckouts were very predictable, with ten of twelve long puckouts being directed down the right, usually towards Brick Walsh. It was easy for the Kilkenny defence to set up against such predictable puckouts. Stephen O’Keeffe varied his long puckouts more in the second half, but with no greater success. Their seemed to be a lot of poor communication between O’Keeffe and his intended targets, but in many cases this may have been simply due to O’Keeffe underhitting or overhitting his pucks.

    The below-par performance of the Waterford players was, in my view, matched by that of the team management. In particular, their failure to make more use of their strong bench by throwing in fresh legs towards the end of what was still a retrievable game was hard to fathom. I am led to believe that the puzzling failure to bring in Tom Devine was due to his being disciplined for a misdemeanour during the week prior to the game. Even if this is true, one wonders if this unduly punished both the rest of the team and the thousands of Waterford supporters in the stadium. Especially with the use of the long ball tactic, Devine’s size and strength would have been useful in the Kilkenny goalmouth and, in particular, could have created openings for Patrick Curran who never once touched the ball during his 20 minutes on the pitch.

    You would wonder how the other members of the panel, who worked so hard during the year, felt about being left on the sideline with the team on the pitch misfiring in many areas. You would also think that, with nothing to lose, the management would have emptied the bench in the closing stages just to give as many players as possible some experience of playing in Croke Park.

    Individual play counts are shown in the table below (excuse the look of the table - I don't know how to transfer tables into these message boxes).

    The crucial difference between the teams was the massive inputs for Kilkenny by Cillian Buckley, Richie Hogan and Michael Fennelly (the Sunday Game gave man of the match to TJ Reid, but that just shows how much they know). Buckley recorded a massive 27 plays (including 22 in-hand possessions). The fact that Waterford had nobody marking him was a big help there, and he generally used the ball well. Richie Hogan had a remarkable 21 possessions and also did a lot of damage (including 5 points from play). While Waterford had three players operating in midfield, none of them was given a specific marking job on Hogan, who repeatedly won ball unchallenged.

    The three Kilkenny players operating in midfield (Fennelly, Hogan and Conor Fogarty) had 56 plays between them, compared with 41 for Waterford’s three midfielders (Kevin Moran, Jamie Barron, Austin Gleeson). Perhaps more significantly, by my count the Kilkenny trio only made five errors, in contrast to a massive 25 for the Waterford trio.

    An interesting aspect of the Kilkenny figures is that two of their fullbacks (Holden and Prendergast) had just seven possessions between them compared with 13 for the other fullback, Paul Murphy. This is because the first two focused on stopping Maurice Shanahan and whoever was with him from winning incoming ball, with Murphy mopping up the breaking ball.
    Two Kilkenny forwards, Eoin Larkin and Colin Fennelly, had very quiet games. Ger Aylward did very little in the first half but hit four points after the change of ends.

    Waterford had two players whose play count was in the twenties, but unfortunately these were both playing deep in defence and therefore were unable to influence the game in the same way as Kilkenny’s big three playmakers. A lot of Tadhg de Búrca’s 20 plays involved him picking up loose ball in his sweeper role. His use of the ball was not nearly as constructive as it usually is, as he hit a lot of long balls downfield and made a lot of uncharacteristic errors. Shane Fives was by far Waterford’s best player on the day with 17 possessions and 21 plays in total. He has had a terrific year and deserves an All Star.

    An interesting feature of Philip Mahony’s and Darragh Fives’s combined 24 possessions was that 19 of them occurred in the second half. Philip Mahony’s first possession in the game came in the 24th minute, which is very poor for a wingback at this level. Both players finished very strongly, which could have produced the springboard for a late comeback, but didn’t.

    The contribution of the Waterford engine-room players (Kevin Moran, Jamie Barron and Brick Walsh) was well below their norm – 29 possessions between them compared with 42 against Dublin, 47 against Cork in the Munster semi-final and 49 in the League final. Playing in the midfield area, Austin Gleeson had more possessions than was the norm for him at wingback, and he did contribute three fine points, but his error count (12) was very high and included poor striking and decision-making, fumbles and giving away two silly frees.

    Apart from Maurice Shanahan’s wholehearted if thankless efforts, the only Waterford forward who can look back on this game with any level of satisfaction is Colin Dunford, who really took the game to the opposition in the second half with his four points (which could well have been six). Jake Dillon’s and Shane Bennett’s low possession counts (4&3, respectively) must be a particular cause of concern. The management will have to think long and hard over the winter about how Waterford can make better use of their high-potential upcoming forward talent in future years.

    Waterford Possessions Other Plays Total Plays Errors
    S O'Keeffe 10 1 11 5
    S Fives 17 4 21 3
    B Coughlan 2 0 2 2
    N Connors 5 5 10 2
    P Mahony 15 0 15 1
    T de Búrca 18 2 20 6
    D Fives 9 5 14 1
    J Barron 10 3 13 8
    K Moran 10 1 11 5
    A Gleeson 14 3 17 12
    M Walsh 9 1 10 3
    J Dillon 4 2 6 2
    C Dunford 12 3 15 1
    Shane Bennett 3 2 5 2
    M Shanahan 5 1 6 1
    Stephen Bennett 1 0 1 0
    Total 144 33 177 54

    Kilkenny
    E Murphy 9 0 9 0
    P Murphy 13 3 16 0
    J Holden 5 2 7 1
    S Prendergast 2 3 5 0
    P Walsh 13 3 16 1
    K Joyce 6 4 10 0
    C Buckley 22 5 27 0
    C Fogarty 10 2 12 0
    M Fennelly 18 4 22 2
    W Walsh 12 2 14 3
    R Hogan 21 1 22 3
    TJ Reid 12 2 14 0
    G Aylward 10 4 14 2
    C Fennelly 7 3 10 2
    E Larkin 6 0 6 0
    Total 166 38 204 14


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 146 ✭✭mickotallow


    Any reports on last nights games in SHC?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 497 ✭✭The blue blaa


    robopaddy2 wrote: »
    The Tony Forristal lads got a hard group by the looks of it. The u15s apparantly well off the pace.

    Anyone know whos taking over the minors next year? Should have a decent group.


    Stephen Gough of Roanmore is supposed to be taking over next years minor he wouldnt be too bad but he dont have good lads around him to help train the team.
    The problem with these development squads of late is getting proper coaches and mentors with experience. Instead the parent's of players are getting involved & some lads who never even played the game or coached are supposed to be bringing the young lads to the next level. Its not the fault of the GDA's in the county who do their best in filling these positions. No point clubs expecting the development squads make their players better if the club mentors dont offer their services.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 281 ✭✭archieknox


    Stephen Gough of Roanmore is supposed to be taking over next years minor he wouldnt be too bad but he dont have good lads around him to help train the team.
    The problem with these development squads of late is getting proper coaches and mentors with experience. Instead the parent's of players are getting involved & some lads who never even played the game or coached are supposed to be bringing the young lads to the next level. Its not the fault of the GDA's in the county who do their best in filling these positions. No point clubs expecting the development squads make their players better if the club mentors dont offer their services.

    Well said. When I looked at the selection committee for the forristal I had to look twice to see I saw the right name. There's one fella on it and he can't look after himself let alone an u14 county team! An absolute joke. If these problems aren't addressed we'll be back to square one in no time. Cork have got there act together at underage with what seems proper structures whereas we have literally picked up fellas from the pubs in Dungarvan at closing time to fill the positions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 411 ✭✭culbaire


    Stephen Gough of Roanmore is supposed to be taking over next years minor he wouldnt be too bad but he dont have good lads around him to help train the team.
    The problem with these development squads of late is getting proper coaches and mentors with experience. Instead the parent's of players are getting involved & some lads who never even played the game or coached are supposed to be bringing the young lads to the next level. Its not the fault of the GDA's in the county who do their best in filling these positions. No point clubs expecting the development squads make their players better if the club mentors dont offer their services.
    Agree! Time some of our former inter county players put a foot forward and offered to take over development squads. The present set up is a joke. We are heading back to square one quickly.
    Re U-16: A lot of work is required to improve skill level skill levels if we are to be competitive at minor. There is still time to tackle the problem. A disaster is looming at minor level for the next few years unless hard decisions are taken. Former inter country players should be approached.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 40,636 ✭✭✭✭PTH2009


    As clare were relagated and we got promotion this year will we have the reverse of there 2015 fixtures next year ??. If so we have dublin and tipp away and cork, Galway,kilkenny at home

    It would be nice to get a game in croke park vs dublin


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 683 ✭✭✭conditioned games


    culbaire wrote: »
    Agree! Time some of our former inter county players put a foot forward and offered to take over development squads. The present set up is a joke. We are heading back to square one quickly.
    Re U-16: A lot of work is required to improve skill level skill levels if we are to be competitive at minor. There is still time to tackle the problem. A disaster is looming at minor level for the next few years unless hard decisions are taken. Former inter country players should be approached.

    Because someone played for a county team does not necessarily mean he would make a good coach or manager. Fergal Hartley would be one example with the U21's. The managers of the minor teams for the last 6yrs no body had anything positive to say on here even though the teams performed fairly well.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 602 ✭✭✭Giveitfong


    Waterford need to appoint a full-time Director of Coaching based in a purpose-built Centre of Excellence (probably located in Dungarvan). His/her main functions would be to promote/oversee coaching (and coach development) in the clubs and schools, and also to work with county development squads. Limerick are doing something along these lines and getting top names involved. We need to identify and develop coaching talent in the county and make sure that these are put in charge of county underage teams.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 602 ✭✭✭Giveitfong


    The women are certainly doing their bit to extend our season. Great second half performance by the Intermediate footballers yesterday to beat Leitrim and qualify for All-Ireland final in Croke Park on fourth Sunday in September. And today Waterford won the All-Ireland Under 16B Camogie All-Ireland for the second year in a row, beating Dublin 2-8 to 1-7 in Nenagh. With Intermediate camogie team already in the All-Ireland final, they certainly seem to have that side of the house in order.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 296 ✭✭Alf Tupper


    Giveitfong wrote: »
    Waterford need to appoint a full-time Director of Coaching based in a purpose-built Centre of Excellence (probably located in Dungarvan). His/her main functions would be to promote/oversee coaching (and coach development) in the clubs and schools, and also to work with county development squads. Limerick are doing something along these lines and getting top names involved. We need to identify and develop coaching talent in the county and make sure that these are put in charge of county underage teams.

    Great idea about the Director of Coaching but we already have a purpose built Centre of Excellence in Waterford, that is due to be developed even further in the next few years.

    Waterford is a small enough county which makes it accessible within an hour from every club.

    I don't think we need another one. This is not a West v East thing. It's just makes sense to develop properly what we have already in place.

    The last thing we need to do is to fall between two stools as we've done with our County grounds.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement