Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Milk Price- Please read Mod note in post #1

1111112114116117334

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,506 ✭✭✭Dawggone


    Many thanks for that insightful post Kowtow.
    A new reality...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Timmaay


    Dawggone wrote: »
    Many thanks for that insightful post Kowtow.
    A new reality...

    Kowtow I hope you won't be bragging that we all heard it here 1st in 5 years time...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 170 ✭✭red_diesel


    Are there any moves for co-op consolidation? How many times have we seen that having so many co-ops is adding x amount of cents per litre.
    Surely the farmer can only go so far but the co-ops have to be seen to do their bit aswell? The costs and inefficiencies of all these co-ops, their boards, staff, admin staff, consultants etc must be colossal. Should we be aiming for one big Fonterra type co-op?

    Ps. I grew up on a dairy farm but I've now no cows now and weekend farmer only. Apologies in advance if above is over simplistic!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 923 ✭✭✭Sacrolyte


    Food for thought indeed. The line that stands out for me in that post is "nobody has a crystal ball ". This is the kernel of the topic at the moment because we are just speculating on the future and what will transpire. As Stan eluded to earlier "chin up and solider on". And to quote another,Danish philosopher Kierkegaard, "Life can only be understood backwards but must be lived forwards"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,135 ✭✭✭kowtow


    Timmaay wrote: »
    Kowtow I hope you won't be bragging that we all heard it here 1st in 5 years time...

    haha.. I doubt it. I thought the post above was wide open and non-specific enough that it almost qualified as a proper forecast :):)

    What I am really trying to illustrate is that it is important to look at a market from a bit of a distance, to challenge the obvious, and to expect it to wrong foot most peoples expectations most of the time.

    It strikes me that we are all expecting volatility, but that most people I speak to imagine that volatility consisting of prices fluctuating between the unbearable (now, soon???) and last years price. They do the maths and come up with an average between 30 and 35c and pat themselves on the back while planning to save in the good years etc. etc.

    If only things were that easy. I suspect that the killer situation for Ireland would not be prices in the low 20's - nor yet prices rocketing up and down to 40 , but actually prices moving relentlessly between, say, 25c and 30c with input and fixed costs steadily rising.

    If I were still any kind of banker that is the situation I would be stress testing, and I'd be wanting to see that borrowers could pay themselves something at that price as well. Any fool can be "price competitive" if he's prepared to work for nothing!

    The market HAS to clear out producers in order to function, if all it does is irritate them and depress them it isn't working properly. If shockingly low prices won't do it, long term attrition will.

    A lot of course also depends on demand, and current prices indicate that the demand everyone was so sure of simply hasn't materialised. No real surprise there - the easy money to be made out of the Chinese milk market has already been made, by the sellers of stainless steel & newspapers. The hard shilling, if it exists at all, is ours to make over the long haul.

    Edit: It is also notable that Irish banks are making money lending for expansion on high land prices, over-collateralised by inherited farms. As far as I can determine they are doing this against a business model in which the borrower / farmer is able to pay himself little or nothing, at least unless the milk price is historically high. It is worth noting that they would not do this for any other, mainstream, business. If we continue to value our (inherited) land at nothing by diluting our equity in it, and our labour at nothing when we calculate cost of production, then the market will make damned sure that that is what they are worth.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,506 ✭✭✭Dawggone


    kowtow wrote: »
    haha.. I doubt it. I thought the post above was wide open and non-specific enough that it almost qualified as a proper forecast :):)

    What I am really trying to illustrate is that it is important to look at a market from a bit of a distance, to challenge the obvious, and to expect it to wrong foot most peoples expectations most of the time.

    It strikes me that we are all expecting volatility, but that most people I speak to imagine that volatility consisting of prices fluctuating between the unbearable (now, soon???) and last years price. They do the maths and come up with an average between 30 and 35c and pat themselves on the back while planning to save in the good years etc. etc.

    If only things were that easy. I suspect that the killer situation for Ireland would not be prices in the low 20's - nor yet prices rocketing up and down to 40 , but actually prices moving relentlessly between, say, 25c and 30c with input and fixed costs steadily rising.

    If I were still any kind of banker that is the situation I would be stress testing, and I'd be wanting to see that borrowers could pay themselves something at that price as well. Any fool can be "price competitive" if he's prepared to work for nothing!

    The market HAS to clear out producers in order to function, if all it does is irritate them and depress them it isn't working properly. If shockingly low prices won't do it, long term attrition will.

    A lot of course also depends on demand, and current prices indicate that the demand everyone was so sure of simply hasn't materialised. No real surprise there - the easy money to be made out of the Chinese milk market has already been made, by the sellers of stainless steel & newspapers. The hard shilling, if it exists at all, is ours to make over the long haul.

    Edit: It is also notable that Irish banks are making money lending for expansion on high land prices, over-collateralised by inherited farms. As far as I can determine they are doing this against a business model in which the borrower / farmer is able to pay himself little or nothing, at least unless the milk price is historically high. It is worth noting that they would not do this for any other, mainstream, business. If we continue to value our (inherited) land at nothing by diluting our equity in it, and our labour at nothing when we calculate cost of production, then the market will make damned sure that that is what they are worth.

    +1. It was too easy to predict a growing market demand when China's economy was expanding at 7+% per year.
    However a 1929 economic event is a possibility in China now...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,497 ✭✭✭rangler1


    red_diesel wrote: »
    Are there any moves for co-op consolidation? How many times have we seen that having so many co-ops is adding x amount of cents per litre.
    Surely the farmer can only go so far but the co-ops have to be seen to do their bit aswell? The costs and inefficiencies of all these co-ops, their boards, staff, admin staff, consultants etc must be colossal. Should we be aiming for one big Fonterra type co-op?

    Ps. I grew up on a dairy farm but I've now no cows now and weekend farmer only. Apologies in advance if above is over simplistic!

    coops won't amalgamate for the same reason as farmers won't, surely farmers amalgamating into bigger units would have the same effect, cut costs, get more efficient etc etc.
    Some of the guys that'd be considering an amalgamation of coops would be a bit slow if they weren't aware that their own jobs were at risk of redundancies.....turkeys voting for Christmas etc etc


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 170 ✭✭red_diesel


    rangler1 wrote: »
    coops won't amalgamate for the same reason as farmers won't, surely farmers amalgamating into bigger units would have the same effect, cut costs, get more efficient etc etc.
    Some of the guys that'd be considering an amalgamation of coops would be a bit slow if they weren't aware that their own jobs were at risk of redundancies.....turkeys voting for Christmas etc etc

    Farmers are in effect amalgamating already. Herd sizes have increased, number of dairy farmers has decreased. I would say the progressive farmers are the ones pushing for co-op consolidation.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,497 ✭✭✭rangler1


    red_diesel wrote: »
    Farmers are in effect amalgamating already. Herd sizes have increased, number of dairy farmers has decreased. I would say the progressive farmers are the ones pushing for co-op consolidation.

    My point is that the management would be foolish to agree to amalgamation.
    On the other hand dairy farmers that are taking over/ amalgamating other farmers are usually dealing with willing sellers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 6,135 ✭✭✭kowtow


    rangler1 wrote: »
    My point is that the management would be foolish to agree to amalgamation.
    On the other hand dairy farmers that are taking over/ amalgamating other farmers are usually dealing with willing sellers.

    Never good to be a seller on the day when your nearest customer joins forces with the only other customer you could possibly reach.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,493 ✭✭✭Greengrass1


    One thing low mp will do is give us all a boot up the arse to keep control of costs and ask ourselves do we really need it


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,890 ✭✭✭mf240


    Horse the milk into them and keep the chequebook in the press.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,493 ✭✭✭Greengrass1


    http://www.newstalk.com/podcasts/Down_To_Business/Down_To_Business/99734/The_Effect_of_the_Falling_Milk_Prices

    A good interview I thought.
    Sone level headed advice. From a new entrant toi


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,471 ✭✭✭Panch18


    Dawggone wrote: »
    +1. It was too easy to predict a growing market demand when China's economy was expanding at 7+% per year.
    However a 1929 economic event is a possibility in China now...

    Whilst the Chinese stock market has fallen a lot recently it is worth bearing in mind that it has increased by about 66% since 1 August 2014 - a truly phenomenal increase

    worth bearing in mind


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,731 ✭✭✭✭mahoney_j


    One thing low mp will do is give us all a boot up the arse to keep control of costs and ask ourselves do we really need it

    Shouldn't need a boot up the arse just cause milk price is low .costs need to be controlled in good and bad times .stock have to be fed,fertliser put out calves reared etc I'm watching what I spend but I get quotes for everything efficiency is where I think a lot of gain can be made


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,493 ✭✭✭Greengrass1


    mahoney_j wrote: »
    Shouldn't need a boot up the arse just cause milk price is low .costs need to be controlled in good and bad times .stock have to be fed,fertliser put out calves reared etc I'm watching what I spend but I get quotes for everything efficiency is where I think a lot of gain can be made

    Definitely but it's easy to carry in habits if spending from high prices into low prices.
    Happened here. Tried to do too much through at the start. Won't do it again


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,731 ✭✭✭✭mahoney_j


    Definitely but it's easy to carry in habits if spending from high prices into low prices.
    Happened here. Tried to do too much through at the start. Won't do it again

    Hear of a lot of lads cutting back on n ,putting out little or no p and k ,no lime ,giving calves less milk and Neal etc etc .crazy stuff .there the nuts and bolts things and shouldn't be cut .itsxthe big things like machinery ,and cap ex u don't really need that can be cut and again been more efficient can save lots


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,812 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    We had a brutal 2012/13 . only recovered from it in middle of 2014. Well used to controlling costs. Think some people got too used to good prices 😀


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,493 ✭✭✭Greengrass1


    mahoney_j wrote: »
    Hear of a lot of lads cutting back on n ,putting out little or no p and k ,no lime ,giving calves less milk and Neal etc etc .crazy stuff .there the nuts and bolts things and shouldn't be cut .itsxthe big things like machinery ,and cap ex u don't really need that can be cut and again been more efficient can save lots

    We've spread p allowance and didn't need to use full N Allowance due to sr but will use it next yr.
    Myself and dad sit down at start of every month and work our what we need and honestly can say nothing is got that's not needed.
    Can save 1c if we get meal to 650 kg without hitting production.
    Reckon we could do that by growing more grass next yr aswell as better silage for winter mikkers


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,493 ✭✭✭Greengrass1


    whelan2 wrote: »
    We had a brutal 2012/13 . only recovered from it in middle of 2014. Well used to controlling costs. Think some people got too used to good prices 😀

    I looked up there today we lost 6.5k last yr in fines due to milk quality.
    Stuff like thermo and then tbc with the old tanks.
    Nome this yr so far.
    Hope it stays that way


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,812 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    New milk tank. Great help


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,132 ✭✭✭jaymla627


    I looked up there today we lost 6.5k last yr in fines due to milk quality.
    Stuff like thermo and then tbc with the old tanks.
    Nome this yr so far.
    Hope it stays that way

    No offence but that's just plain ridiculous, how in God's name where you able to justify a new tractor last year but couldn't stretch to a bulk tank when you where having those kind of issues


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Timmaay


    I looked up there today we lost 6.5k last yr in fines due to milk quality.
    Stuff like thermo and then tbc with the old tanks.
    Nome this yr so far.
    Hope it stays that way

    Not long over them days here either, say we lost the same 2 years ago between dumped milk and fines, some kick in the teeth.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Timmaay


    jaymla627 wrote: »
    No offence but that's just plain ridiculous, how in God's name where you able to justify a new tractor last year but couldn't stretch to a bulk tank when you where having those kind of issues

    double whammy being the electricity saving with a new fully functional tank. But anyways I don't think GG had a say in the tractor ha. but fair play for him admitting them problems, at least others might learn from those mistakes ha.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,278 ✭✭✭frazzledhome


    jaymla627 wrote: »
    No offence but that's just plain ridiculous, how in God's name where you able to justify a new tractor last year but couldn't stretch to a bulk tank when you where having those kind of issues

    No offence my whole, the man is being honest and get that shyte thrown back at him.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,493 ✭✭✭Greengrass1


    jaymla627 wrote: »
    No offence but that's just plain ridiculous, how in God's name where you able to justify a new tractor last year but couldn't stretch to a bulk tank when you where having those kind of issues

    We had no intention of buying a tractor but our own was unrepairable.
    I'm not sorry now we bought it. No business is perfect. I'm not the first person to get milk quality fines


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,493 ✭✭✭Greengrass1


    Timmaay wrote: »
    double whammy being the electricity saving with a new fully functional tank. But anyways I don't think GG had a say in the tractor ha. but fair play for him admitting them problems, at least others might learn from those mistakes ha.

    Had a lot worse problems in 09 than we do now with scc mastitis calf health fertility only 50% of cows milking had a calf that yr and mam and dad got through it
    Dad cut timber off ditches to sell to keep 2 sisters in college. I'd do it again too if it came to that


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 30,812 ✭✭✭✭whelan2


    Had a lot worse problems in 09 than we do now with scc mastitis calf health fertility only 50% of cows milking had a calf that yr and mam and dad got through it Dad cut timber off ditches to sell to keep 2 sisters in college. I'd do it again too if it came to that


    Was trying to remember 09. Was able to afford to pay a full time wage to some one so mustn't have been too bad. 2012/13 was worse here


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,392 ✭✭✭✭Timmaay


    09 was the big crunch here also, only delivered about 3300l per cow! Summer 2012 we shouldn't have been effected 1/2 as bad but the roadways in very poor shape, I remember cows crossing 3 paddocks to come in for milking, the closest to the parlour has a wet clay structure, the cows were wading through 2ft of muck and sh1te! Milk might be only at break even now but thank God them days over!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,506 ✭✭✭Dawggone


    Timmaay wrote: »
    but thank God them days over!

    I hope you're right...'85 and '86 were two memorable years also.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement