Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.
Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/
Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.
Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/
Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
Jeremy Clarkson suspended
Comments
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
-
-
Advertisement
-
-
-
-
Anyone could have cancer.
He doesn't have cancer.
The story is "a cancer scare" Try reading it.I know people who have had cancer.
I know people who have had cancer and died.
I know people who have had cancer and survived.
I know people who found a lump that turned out to be not cancer.
I know people who have had cancer scares
I know people who have had cancer and died.
I know people who have had cancer and survived.
I know people who found a lump that turned out to be not cancer.
Good choice of rhetoric. FYP.None of the above, at any point, appeared to get hammered and punch someone.
Were you with them 24/7?
That's kind of strange.Nor did any of them, in my memory, use their illness or concern about same, as an excuse to be an @sshole.
Neither did Clarky boy. Who kept it all secret and took the stick like a man until an appropriate time to speak of the scare.But its great that your attention seeking little mind thinks it's an excuse and attempts to use expectations of compassion to expect to see the diva that Clarkson was on that evening somehow be understood.
Attack the post, not the poster :rolleyes: Funny how the anti-Clarkson brigade need a constant reminder of manners.Everyone has bad times, most cope with it with a measure of dignity.
Sadly on that occasion he conducted himself with no dignity at all.
On the other hand, since the event all parties appeared to be quite dignified in their handling of the situation.
The only people that let Clarkson down now are blowhards and attention seekers who make fools of themselves on threads like this.
Yes Clarkson did the right thing in letting the bosses know what happened after etc and yes it's a pity the anti-Clarkson brigade come across so poorly.Lol, thats ridiculous on so many levels
Great contribution. Use of Lol is ridiculous on so many more levels.He got the all-clear. Before the hotel incident, I understand. Chances are it was mentioned in passing along with all the other things it could possibly be and has been focussed on.
Were you there? This is typical of the posting strategy of the anti-Clarkson brigade since the beginning of the thread. Jump on a bandwagon, regardless of facts.0 -
-
-
-
-
-
Bringing up cancer as a way to garner public sympathy is right out of the Jordan/ Kerry Katona school of PR.
Careful now! Comparing Clarkson to Hitler, Stalin and Pol Pot is one thing but comparing him to those two "things" is crossing the line! I simply cannot conceive of an insult (and I can conceive of a great many insults) for those yokes, words fail me and that doesn't happen often.
If I ever subscribed to the notion of lizard or reptilian people, those two would be the first whose face I'd peel off to see if they're human underneath.
I've enjoyed arguing with you, but that is going too far!
0 -
Advertisement
-
-
Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 34,811 CMod ✭✭✭✭
Join Date:Posts: 34028
dr.fuzzenstein wrote: »Careful now! Comparing Clarkson to Hitler, Stalin and Pol Pot is one thing but comparing him to those two "things" is crossing the line! I simply cannot conceive of an insult (and I can conceive of a great many insults) for those yokes, words fail me and that doesn't happen often.
If I ever subscribed to the notion of lizard or reptilian people, those two would be the first whose face I'd peel off to see if they're human underneath.
I've enjoyed arguing with you, but that is going too far!
http://img17.dreamies.de/img/670/b/g5lkkdpj57v.gif0 -
Are we rewriting events to suit points of view?
When was Oisin bound to accept apologies?
He was assaulted while working, and there was a process to go through.
Any apology was a seperate issue.
He would have been instructed to have no contact with the other party until the matter was dealt with, and this would have been for the protection of both.
FFS, stop flogging the horse, it's dead and has been for some time.
Where did I say Oisin is bound to accept apologies? The poster said Clarskon should've apologised and I pointed out that he did.
Really, what's with the anti-Clarkson brigade and their inability to read plain text without jumping to inaccurate conclusions :rolleyes:0 -
Where did I say Oisin is bound to accept apologies? The poster said Clarskon should've apologised and I pointed out that he did.
Really, what's with the anti-Clarkson brigade and their inability to read plain text without jumping to inaccurate conclusions :rolleyes:
Stop flogging a dead horse, mate.0 -
-
-
Where did I say Oisin is bound to accept apologies? The poster said Clarskon should've apologised and I pointed out that he did.
Really, what's with the anti-Clarkson brigade and their inability to read plain text without jumping to inaccurate conclusions :rolleyes:
What's with the pro clarkson brigade defending a cúnt?0 -
-
-
Advertisement
-
Advertisement