Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Gorse Hill eviction ratified by court

1356

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,201 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    cloud493 wrote: »
    I've said it before, but I find it baffling how any one person can owe anyone or any institution that much money, its insane. And the fact this bloke has the gall to drag it out long as possible like he has some defence of what he's done, so he shouldn't have to leave.

    The owed more than €1bn at one stage. Sure the balance of €60mill is so small it should be written off.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,201 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    That then leads to the question of who or what entity drew down the funds and thereby is liable for the repayment of the monies - The Trust, which is a Limited Company, The Trustees, or the O'Donnells or some other body.

    It might look like utter BS to you, but it's a legal structure, and it has to proven, under Law, that it is within the BOI's rights to take possession of the property. The O'Donnels are also within their rights to counter-argue for as long as they have an argument the Courts find credible enough to deserve a hearing.

    I don't have much interest either way in the outcome, I'm just trying to explain why it could well take a fair while to sort and isn't as clear cut as people seem to believe..

    The pleaded facts are slightly different and have shifted. The property is owned by Vico Ltd which some years ago guaranteed the personal debts of the elder O'Donnells. When the matters came to court, Mr O'Donnell turned up with paperwork (of disputed and unproven provenance) that Vico Ltd was standing as trustee for the children and perhaps this should defeat the mortgage. Now that all of that has been dealt with and subordinated to the mortgage he and his wife have returned from their true and ever lasting home in the UK (where they have their burial plots, library cards and residents association memberships) to assert a "right of residence" which was purportedly granted to them moons ago and which he now asserts he has not abandoned despite abandoning all residence in Ireland.

    They are all self deluded.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,184 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    What will Gerry Bead do when it's over, no excuse to be on the tele anymore.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 626 ✭✭✭Massimo Cassagrande


    Marcusm wrote: »
    The pleaded facts are slightly different and have shifted. The property is owned by Vico Ltd which some years ago guaranteed the personal debts of the elder O'Donnells. When the matters came to court, Mr O'Donnell turned up with paperwork (of disputed and unproven provenance) that Vico Ltd was standing as trustee for the children and perhaps this should defeat the mortgage. Now that all of that has been dealt with and subordinated to the mortgage he and his wife have returned from their true and ever lasting home in the UK (where they have their burial plots, library cards and residents association memberships) to assert a "right of residence" which was purportedly granted to them moons ago and which he now asserts he has not abandoned despite abandoning all residence in Ireland.

    They are all self deluded.

    A tangled web...untangling it might take a while...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,813 ✭✭✭chrysagon


    a stench of greed


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,610 ✭✭✭✭VinLieger


    A tangled web...untangling it might take a while...

    Not really, they live in england 99% of the time until this kicked off and it was prudent for them to move back claim it as their primary residence, not exactly rocket science to figure out


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 626 ✭✭✭Massimo Cassagrande


    VinLieger wrote: »
    Not really, they live in england 99% of the time until this kicked off and it was prudent for them to move back claim it as their primary residence, not exactly rocket science to figure out

    Courts tend to not go too much on "Figuring things out" tho so no doubt each and every loophole, argument and angle has to be exhausted first..


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,201 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    A tangled web...untangling it might take a while...

    It's been untangled; they are now creating and pleading matters which they have previously omitted to raise. They know enough of law and procedure to frustrate the orders of the court. I suspect that, had they the cash or the inclination, that they would find it difficult to find a barrister who would be willing to act on this matter.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 24,461 ✭✭✭✭darkpagandeath


    Were they not in the Uk going on about homes there being the Family home ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,201 ✭✭✭✭Marcusm


    Were they not in the Uk going on about homes there being the Family home ?

    That was in the context of an England & Wales High Court case following which the judge stated that he did not regard Mr O'Donnell as a frank or even a wholly truthful witness.

    We Irish should of course disregard such statements as the rantings of perfidious Albion.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 13,839 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 980 ✭✭✭stevedublin



    but he is going to appeal to European Court of Human rights and if that doesn't work the Interplanetary Council of Elders.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,142 ✭✭✭Hitchens


    It was the old keys he threw at Boucher:pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,103 ✭✭✭mathie


    http://www.independent.ie/business/irish/brian-odonnell-tosses-keys-of-gorse-hill-at-bank-of-ireland-boss-31181741.html
    Mr O'Donnell said that they had been to court 82 times and had lost 82 times. "Statistically that's impossible," he said.

    ... but actually possible if you're in the wrong.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,744 ✭✭✭diomed


    Throwing back the keys is so Celtic Tiger.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,835 ✭✭✭✭cloud493


    Apparently the keys thrown back are the old locks, and the current locks have been changed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,420 ✭✭✭Lollipops23


    This family is scum. The arrogance and entitlement they've shown knows no bounds.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,427 ✭✭✭Dr Strange


    The saga continues! Although it says the receiver has taken possession it seems that Jerry Beades posted a note on the gate saying that the house is property of VICO LIMITED and that they would see any BOI or receiver entering the grounds as trespassers. They apparently changed the locks and electronic access fobs too. What a bunch of wasters :rolleyes:

    Link: http://www.rte.ie/news/2015/0429/697512-brian-odonnell-gorse-hill/


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,284 ✭✭✭StewartGriffin


    FFS, if he was going to make a dramatic event of it he could have tossed them a bit harder than that. "Fiddlesticks to you, Mister Boucher!"

    That told him!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Walking up to the desk at the AGM and dropping the keys in front of the CEO.

    What an egotistical cock, like he's the only person in the world who's ever had a property repossessed by a bank.

    This is nothing but a deliberate circus for the O'Donnells from start to finish, a cry for attention from the media.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 68,173 ✭✭✭✭seamus


    Preusse wrote: »
    The saga continues! Although it says the receiver has taken posetion it seems that Jerry Beades posted a note on the gate saying that the house is property of VICO LIMITED and that they would see any BOI or receiver entering the grounds as trespassers. They apparently changed the locks and electronic access fobs too. What a bunch of wasters :rolleyes:
    Jerry Beades can do what he likes. Now that the bank are in possession of the property they can legally change the locks and access codes without having to deal with Jerry.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,427 ✭✭✭Dr Strange


    seamus wrote: »
    Jerry Beades can do what he likes. Now that the bank are in possession of the property they can legally change the locks and access codes without having to deal with Jerry.

    Maybe we see some scuffles....then again, maybe not. :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,995 ✭✭✭take everything


    and if that doesn't work the Interplanetary Council of Elders.

    Beades is pretty familiar with them I'd say.


  • Posts: 22,384 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    If they are out on the road, I can donate an old pair of runners and a brown paper bag to cover the bottle of cheap sherry, and maybe a string for the dog.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 16,059 ✭✭✭✭josip


    and finally that family will now fade away into irrelevance...


  • Posts: 22,384 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    josip wrote: »
    and finally that family will now fade away into irrelevance...

    Surely not, I hope people remember to point and laugh at them for aaaaaaaages.

    It set news records for lack of dignity.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,194 ✭✭✭foxy farmer


    Never mind sending in the receiver send in a bulldozer.
    My biggest fear was the longer this saga continued the more likely some sympathetic judge would hear the case. Then the whole case would be thrown out the window and o Donnell could stay there regardless.
    Nice to see justice prevailing in the end.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 1,078 ✭✭✭Muff Richardson


    if he is taking this for some ludicrous reason to the European court of human rights as he says he is, does it mean the property will be in legal limbo for another long period of time until that is laughed out of court, or can BOI go ahead straight away with selling the property???


  • Posts: 22,384 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    if he is taking this for some ludicrous reason to the European court of human rights as he says he is, does it mean the property will be in legal limbo for another long period of time until that is laughed out of court, or can BOI go ahead straight away with selling the property???

    I'd say they can go ahead, presume if he goes further there won't be any stay on any order pending a hearing and all he could possibly seek is damages. Can't be certain but don't think all decisions here are up in the air while someone mulls over their ECJ options.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,074 ✭✭✭pmasterson95


    Whos paying for the 82 court cases?


Advertisement
Advertisement