Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Jeremy Clarkson suspended

17980828485100

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,555 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Kirby wrote: »
    Which would matter, if he was an elected official or somebody in charge of something important. But he's not. He's an entertainer thus many people, myself included, don't care what he's like personally.

    Him hitting a producer or not hitting a producer wouldn't stop me from liking his show in the same way that Michael Jackson being accused of all sorts didn't stop me from enjoying his music. Issues like that just aren't relevant.

    Very strange post there.

    Of course issues like that are relevant to the vast majority of viewers and customers.

    There is such a thing as morality, it's a bit ike suggesting that people would enjoy Jimmy Saville programmes if they knew what he was up to?

    Very extreme example , I know, but the personal behaviour af any artist or performer is of course relevant.

    Let's not lose the run of ourselves here.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 262 ✭✭Bench Press


    Jesus Christ! comparing Jezza to Jimmy Saville now! that is outrageous! he certainly has a lot of idiots rattled


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,945 ✭✭✭Grandpa Hassan


    Very strange post there.

    Of course issues like that are relevant to the vast majority of viewers and customers.

    I don't think that getting in a scuffle with a producer is relevant to the vast majority of viewers at all. Let's see what the viewing numbers are like when he appears with a new show....I bet they are very high


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,928 ✭✭✭✭osarusan



    Of course issues like that are relevant to the vast majority of viewers and customers.

    Very extreme example , I know, but the personal behaviour af any artist or performer is of course relevant
    .

    I'm not too sure about that. I would say there are plenty of people who are fans of Clarkson and the show, who don't really care too much what he gets up to off television, but just want him to be able to present the show.

    these people will be happy to downplay anything negative about him, in order to allow him to continue presenting the shore.

    We we see the same thing with sports stars and actors and so on, because they are popular, and more importantly, because they are worth a lot of money, they get away with a lot of stuff at times.

    Thankfully, The BBC took a more objective approach than this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,089 ✭✭✭✭P. Breathnach


    I don't think that getting in a scuffle with a producer is relevant to the vast majority of viewers at all.
    Well, not to the kind of viewer who misrepresents what he did. A "scuffle" implies some participation by everybody involved. It was one person verbally and physically attacking another.
    Let's see what the viewing numbers are like when he appears with a new show....I bet they are very high
    Perhaps initially, fuelled by curiosity. But I think the Clarkson brand was coming to its sell-by date before this happened. There are only so many times you can do pretty much the same thing before people lose interest. I'm surprised that he got away with it as long as he did.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 18,067 ✭✭✭✭fryup


    say what you like about him, but there's no way getting away from the fact that his hair is legendary...



  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 16,575 ✭✭✭✭dr.fuzzenstein


    Forget the hair, if he had said today what he said then he would certainly be burned at the stake these days.
    Punching your staff and being a kiddie fiddler is one thing. But denying global warming? Now that's a capital crime! :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,570 ✭✭✭Mint Aero


    Global warming & cooling is a natural cycle that we humans have no influence over.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 892 ✭✭✭Just a little Samba


    Mint Aero wrote: »
    Global warming & cooling is a natural cycle that we humans have no influence over.

    ... vaccines cause autism, the holocaust didn't happen, the world is controlled by the Rothschild family and their reptilian brethren, NASA never went to the moon and I shoot JR.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,570 ✭✭✭Mint Aero


    ... vaccines cause autism, the holocaust didn't happen, the world is controlled by the Rothschild family and their reptilian brethren, NASA never went to the moon and I shoot JR.

    Only one of those might be true....why did you shoot JR? WHY!?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,828 ✭✭✭DeadHand


    There is such a thing as morality, it's a bit ike suggesting that people would enjoy Jimmy Saville programmes if they knew what he was up to?

    Let's not lose the run of ourselves here.

    You compare Clarkson to Jimmy Saville and then tell everyone else not to lose the run of themselves?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,089 ✭✭✭✭P. Breathnach


    DeadHand wrote: »
    You compare Clarkson to Jimmy Saville and then tell everyone else not to lose the run of themselves?
    You have just lost the run of yourself.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,555 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    DeadHand wrote: »
    You compare Clarkson to Jimmy Saville and then tell everyone else not to lose the run of themselves?

    I did not compare Clarkson to Jimmy Saville, I was responding to a post which implied that the poster considered the behaviour of media presenters was not relevant.

    I put forward the point that is was relevant.

    However you will always get the 'die hards' who chose to ignore all this as long as their man or woman delivers their brand of 'entertainment'.

    After all, Idi Amin had his followers, Charles Manson had his acolytes, who chose to ignore their morality as 'not relevant'

    Interesting humN behaviour study, Ph.D there for somebody :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,945 ✭✭✭Grandpa Hassan


    I did not compare Clarkson to Jimmy Saville, I was responding to a post which implied that the poster considered the behaviour of media presenters was not relevant.

    I put forward the point that is was relevant.

    However you will always get the 'die hards' who chose to ignore all this as long as their man or woman delivers their brand of 'entertainment'.

    After all, Idi Amin had his followers, Charles Manson had his acolytes, who chose to ignore their morality as 'not relevant'

    Interesting humN behaviour study, Ph.D there for somebody :rolleyes:

    Some more great comparisons. Well done


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,555 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    Some more great comparisons. Well done

    Examples of human behaviour Grandpa, not comparisons.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,945 ✭✭✭Grandpa Hassan


    Examples of human behaviour Grandpa, not comparisons.

    Oh I see. Thanks for clarifying

    You're comparing those that don't really care what clarkson did to those that don't really care what idi Amin did. That makes much more sense


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,828 ✭✭✭DeadHand


    After all, Idi Amin had his followers, Charles Manson had his acolytes, who chose to ignore their morality as 'not relevant'

    So, fresh from comparing Clarkson to Jimmy Savile, you now compare him to Idi Amin and Charles Manson and his supporters to the supporters of those individuals.

    The unthinking bad will toward this harmless fool is staggering. The childish hysteria around this subject is nauseating.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 20,555 ✭✭✭✭Brendan Bendar


    DeadHand wrote: »
    So, fresh from comparing Clarkson to Jimmy Savile, you now compare him to Idi Amin and Charles Manson and his supporters to the supporters of those individuals.

    The unthinking bad will toward this harmless fool is staggering. The childish hysteria around this subject is nauseating.


    What's much more nauseating is the attempt by his fans to disregard his behaviour to a work colleague.

    There is no getting away from this event, no amount of spin from the Clarkson fans can change that, even though they seem to think they can.

    Clarksons gone, and rightly so, not as if it's a first 'incident' or even a second.

    Time to settle down and think logically, shot his bolt,past his sell-by, finito.

    Only way it could pan out.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,828 ✭✭✭DeadHand


    What's much more nauseating is the attempt by his fans to disregard his behaviour to a work colleague.

    There is no getting away from this event, no amount of spin from the Clarkson fans can change that, even though they seem to think they can.

    Clarksons gone, and rightly so, not as if it's a first 'incident' or even a second.

    Time to settle down and think logically, shot his bolt,past his sell-by, finito.

    Only way it could pan out.


    Whatever about all that you have, in your hysterical hatred, lost all sense of scale and perspective when you insist on introducing men like Idi Amin, Charles Manson and Jimmy Savile into an argument about a man whose greatest "crimes" to date have been a few inadvisable remarks and a minor altercation.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,084 ✭✭✭✭Kirby


    What's much more nauseating is the attempt by his fans to disregard his behaviour to a work colleague.

    There is no getting away from this event, no amount of spin from the Clarkson fans can change that, even though they seem to think they can.

    Clarkson fans? He doesn't have fans. He's not U2 or One direction.

    I know it makes you feel better to lump everyone who disagrees with you into neat little "pro Clarkson" "anti Clarkson" boxes but the world doesn't work like that.

    The bottom line is, most people don't care what he did. That's the reality of the situation and I know you are finding it irritating that we all aren't outraged that he punched a producer and celebrating that he got sacked like you.....but we just don't care. People get thumped every night outside a club and I don't care about that either.

    This was blown up into a bigger issue than it was. The show went off the air and that's a shame. The vendetta that people like yourself had against this middle aged man is just as ridiculous as the campaigns in support of him.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,949 ✭✭✭Mesrine65


    What's much more nauseating is the attempt by his fans to disregard his behaviour to a work colleague.

    There is no getting away from this event, no amount of spin from the Clarkson fans can change that, even though they seem to think they can.

    Clarksons gone, and rightly so, not as if it's a first 'incident' or even a second.

    Time to settle down and think logically, shot his bolt,past his sell-by, finito.

    Only way it could pan out.
    Did Clarkson bugger your dog or something?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,553 ✭✭✭Tarzana2


    Kirby wrote: »
    Clarkson fans? He doesn't have fans.

    :D:D:D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,197 ✭✭✭Eutow


    Kirby wrote: »
    Clarkson fans? He doesn't have fans. He's not U2 or One direction.

    Re-read the thread, and see what the poster who thanked your post thinks about Clarkson. What about the million people that signed a petition to keep him as a Top Gear presenter?
    Kirby wrote: »

    The bottom line is, most people don't care what he did. That's the reality of the situation and I know you are finding it irritating that we all aren't outraged that he punched a producer and celebrating that he got sacked like you.....but we just don't care. People get thumped every night outside a club and I don't care about that either.

    People should care if a presenter bullies, punches and verbally abuses co-workers, because they wouldn't like it to happen to them. Do you expect the BBC to just say, "Ah feck it, he is a popular presenter, so what if he punches co-workers". "Carry on".


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,570 ✭✭✭Mint Aero


    Eutow wrote: »
    Re-read the thread, and see what the poster who thanked your post thinks about Clarkson.

    I've made no secret of the fact that I'm Clarky boys biggest number 1 fan :D
    I even wrote a song, if I may?

    *Ahem*

    We love you Clarkson we do
    We love you Clarkson we do
    We love you Clarkson we do
    Oh Clarkson, we love you!

    Everyone now! :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,197 ✭✭✭Eutow


    Mint Aero wrote: »
    I've made no secret of the fact that I'm Clarky boys biggest number 1 fan :D
    I even wrote a song, if I may?

    *Ahem*

    We love you Clarkson we do
    We love you Clarkson we do
    We love you Clarkson we do
    Oh Clarkson, we love you!

    Everyone now! :D


    Exactly, but Kirby stated Clarkson has no fans. I like Clarkson myself and have watched Top Gear since the early 90's right up to the present day, but I still feel he had to be punished for his actions.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,945 ✭✭✭Grandpa Hassan


    And he's been punished appropriately. He's not been executed, but instead is off the bbc and free to get a contract elsewhere. Which he will. And millions will watch.

    He's received a wake up call. The bbc has been able to show it's done the right thing. The fans will still get to see him. No one has really lost out. Which is an appropriate end game for an issue that I don't think a huge amount of people care about


  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 34,811 CMod ✭✭✭✭CiDeRmAn


    One staff member hitting a subordinate, not cool, possibly assault, probably fired.
    One staff member seducing and bullying underage children into sex, definitely sexual assault, rape and paedophilia.
    Both not acceptable in the workplace and the similarities end there.

    Like comparing scratching someones car with your door in a supermarket car park and someone else using a car to kidnap and murder someone, both crimes yes, but a slight difference in severity.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,084 ✭✭✭✭Kirby


    And he's been punished appropriately. He's not been executed, but instead is off the bbc and free to get a contract elsewhere. Which he will. And millions will watch.

    He's received a wake up call. The bbc has been able to show it's done the right thing. The fans will still get to see him. No one has really lost out. Which is an appropriate end game for an issue that I don't think a huge amount of people care about

    Everyone losing out is not the same as nobody losing. It's not a zero sum game.

    Clarkson lost his job along with Hammond and May, the BBC lost the rest of this series of top gear, the producer who got assaulted will end up producing a less popular show.....frankly every one lost.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,945 ✭✭✭Grandpa Hassan


    Kirby wrote: »
    Everyone losing out is not the same as nobody losing. It's not a zero sum game.

    Clarkson lost his job along with Hammond and May, the BBC lost the rest of this series of top gear, the producer who got assaulted will end up producing a less popular show.....frankly every one lost.

    Clarkson lost his bbc platform. I'm not sure he'll find it too hard to find another, with or without his team


  • Advertisement
  • Moderators, Category Moderators, Computer Games Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 34,811 CMod ✭✭✭✭CiDeRmAn


    I don't recall May and Hammond losing their jobs, talk of them quitting alright, hitching their wagon to Clarksons fortunes, and good luck to them.
    I don't think people should forget the reach the BBC has into British living rooms and, thanks to BBC America, US homes too.
    Whatever driving show they come up with will have that reach and that maybe something that'll result in success once they get the right team to present it.


Advertisement