Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.

Sinn Fein - looming health service disaster?

1373840424351

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,292 ✭✭✭RecordStraight


    Lee, we've known for days now that Sinn Fein have binned that position and are now looking to merely cut the pay of people earning over 150k by a third, plus taking more tax off them.

    Edit: Ah, I see a figure of a 15% cut being bandied about now. Where did that come from??
    And yet another figure from Sinn Fein document: a hard 150k cap!

    A cap of €150,000 on salaries of hospital consultants would save €210 million
    Does anyone know what Sinn Fein's actual policy is right now?

    Because Sinn Fein don't seem to.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,247 ✭✭✭✭BoJack Horseman


    LeeMajors wrote: »
    My website?

    Opps, I meant 'the collectives' website.

    Peruse & get back to us with a case for the defence of the Shinner health doctrine.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,296 ✭✭✭✭Jawgap


    LeeMajors wrote: »
    So a 15% cut on pay between €150k and €200k results in a cap of €100k?
    Round and round it goes.........

    Well they moved on - considerably - from their original plans.......

    why?

    Probably because they realised how ridiculous they were......

    Now, they're planning to save €9m! Doubt that covers the toilet roll budget for the HSE :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,405 ✭✭✭LeeMajors


    Lee, we've known for days now that Sinn Fein have binned that position and are now looking to merely cut the pay of people earning over 150k by a third, plus taking more tax off them.

    Have we?
    Maybe you could show us that document too?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,247 ✭✭✭✭BoJack Horseman


    LeeMajors wrote: »
    Very old looking document that.
    What year is that from?

    Here, you know what I could do?
    I could produce an old FG document where they state that 'a tax on the family home is immoral and unjust'.
    Is that still their policy do you think?

    Jeez Lee.

    If we didn't know any better we'd think you were dodging the issue!

    I welcome the FG thread you will no doubt create.

    But, on topic, Shinner health policy..... what do you think?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,323 ✭✭✭frankbrett


    And yet another figure from Sinn Fein document: a hard 150k cap!
    Does anyone know what Sinn Fein's actual policy is right now?

    Because Sinn Fein don't seem to.

    That €150k cap was in the budget 2013 doc but subsequently binned


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,292 ✭✭✭RecordStraight


    LeeMajors wrote: »
    Have we?
    Maybe you could show us that document too?
    Just to be clear: you have no idea what Sinn Fein's policy on doctors' and consultant's pay is?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,066 ✭✭✭✭Happyman42


    Jawgap wrote: »
    Just on the point of docs bailing because of salaries or lack thereof......

    Salary one reason HSE director quit to go back to Australia





    So I guess the Shinner's plans are fine, as long as we don't want world class physicians staffing our health system.

    World Class? Wasn't the number of people on trolleys record broken under his watch?
    I'd have sacked him tbh. But he jumped ship instead.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,405 ✭✭✭LeeMajors


    Jawgap wrote: »
    Just on the point of docs bailing because of salaries or lack thereof......

    Salary one reason HSE director quit to go back to Australia





    So I guess the Shinner's plans are fine, as long as we don't want world class physicians staffing our health system.

    He bailed because his wife got a better job in their home country.
    The most telling part of that article is where he wishes his successor well in 'this stressed system'.

    Either way, he was earning less than €150k.

    How did SF influence him in his decision to head home with his missus?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,405 ✭✭✭LeeMajors


    Jawgap wrote: »
    Well they moved on - considerably - from their original plans.......

    why?

    Probably because they realised how ridiculous they were......

    Now, they're planning to save €9m! Doubt that covers the toilet roll budget for the HSE :D

    Grand, so SF have changed their 4 year old policy, formulated when the country was flat broke and changed a few things to reflect the current economic climate.

    Should political parties set their position in stone in your opinion?

    As an aside, are property taxes still 'immoral and unjust' in FG land?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,066 ✭✭✭✭Happyman42


    LeeMajors wrote: »
    Grand, so SF have changed their 4 year old policy, formulated when the country was flat broke and changed a few things to reflect the current economic climate.

    Should political parties set their position in stone in your opinion?

    As an aside, are property taxes still 'immoral and unjust' in FG land?

    Maybe they need a diagram to understand the difference between 'Policy' and 'Policy Proposals'?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,247 ✭✭✭✭BoJack Horseman


    LeeMajors wrote: »
    Grand, so SF have changed their 4 year old policy, formulated when the country was flat broke and changed a few things to reflect the current economic climate.

    Indeed, thanks to ignoring SF's opposition to everything, the government have been able to close the deficit.

    However the Irish NHS is still the central plank of Shinner health policy.

    Do you think their savings projections on wages & procurement are feasible & will be able to deliver an NHS?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,296 ✭✭✭✭Jawgap


    Happyman42 wrote: »
    World Class? Wasn't the number of people on trolleys record broken under his watch?
    I'd have sacked him tbh. But he jumped ship instead.

    So he arrived here in Autumn 2013 from Queensland as National Director of Acute Services and was appointed to head up the ED Taskforce in summer 2014.......on his watch the wait time in EDs was reduced, Full Capacity Protocols were introduced, and yes the people waiting on trolleys maxed out about a week before he left during the flu and Norovirus season.

    So in the six months he had the gig, by your measure, he achieved insufficient to retain his job.

    Well, at least we have the benchmark against which Shinner ministers will be measured.......or do they get held to a different standard?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,292 ✭✭✭RecordStraight


    Happyman42 wrote: »
    Maybe they need a diagram to understand the difference between 'Policy' and 'Policy Proposals'?
    Happyman, I already quoted to you from the dictionary: policy and 'policy proposals' are the same thing.

    I believe you said you must have been out of school that day. How quickly we forget.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,247 ✭✭✭✭BoJack Horseman


    Happyman42 wrote: »
    Maybe they need a diagram to understand the difference between 'Policy' and 'Policy Proposals'?

    Please do.

    The Shinners "guide to obfuscation" would be helpful!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,292 ✭✭✭RecordStraight


    Please do.

    The Shinners "guide to obfuscation" would be helpful!
    Happyman thinks that only one party at a time can have 'policies'.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 20,296 ✭✭✭✭Jawgap


    LeeMajors wrote: »
    Grand, so SF have changed their 4 year old policy, formulated when the country was flat broke and changed a few things to reflect the current economic climate.

    Should political parties set their position in stone in your opinion?

    As an aside, are property taxes still 'immoral and unjust' in FG land?

    Surely you mean 'abandoned' moving from a salary cap to simply top slicing isn't so much a change as a u-turn :D

    Some consistency would be nice - surely a consultant who was overpaid in 2011 is still overpaid today?

    Good to see another person acknowledge the economic progress from 2011 ;)


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭✭Dan_Solo


    Jawgap wrote: »
    Just on the point of docs bailing because of salaries or lack thereof......

    Salary one reason HSE director quit to go back to Australia.
    Cool story bro.
    You are aware of the whole anecdote v data thing?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,405 ✭✭✭LeeMajors


    Jawgap wrote: »
    Surely you mean 'abandoned' moving from a salary cap to simply top slicing isn't so much a change as a u-turn :D

    Some consistency would be nice - surely a consultant who was overpaid in 2011 is still overpaid today?

    Good to see another person acknowledge the economic progress from 2011 ;)

    If using language like 'abandoned' makes you feel better, don't let me stop you.
    Pejorative terminology seems to be a speciality of the anti-Sfer.
    Still, if it makes you happy.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭✭Dan_Solo


    And yet another figure from Sinn Fein document: a hard 150k cap!
    Hahahahaha! You knew well that "a document" or "the document" had you scuppered so you went with just "document"! That's priceless!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,292 ✭✭✭RecordStraight


    Dan_Solo wrote: »
    Cool story bro.
    You are aware of the whole anecdote v data thing?
    I'm sure he is, but when we try to talk about the data that shows falling unemployment, rising economic growth, rising exports, etc. etc. that is dismissed by the Sinn Fein posse and we are treated anecdotes about some lad losing his job or whatever.

    Either that, or the CSO is dismissed as a government conspiracy.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,066 ✭✭✭✭Happyman42


    Jawgap wrote: »
    So he arrived here in Autumn 2013 from Queensland as National Director of Acute Services and was appointed to head up the ED Taskforce in summer 2014.......on his watch the wait time in EDs was reduced, Full Capacity Protocols were introduced, and yes the people waiting on trolleys maxed out about a week before he left during the flu and Norovirus season.

    So in the six months he had the gig, by your measure, he achieved insufficient to retain his job.

    Well, at least we have the benchmark against which Shinner ministers will be measured.......or do they get held to a different standard?

    Anybody whinging about money in a well paid job like that I would tell to leave/sack.
    If money is distracting you 9 months into the job then something was wrong with the decision to give you the job in the first place.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭✭Dan_Solo


    Just to be clear: you have no idea what Sinn Fein's policy on doctors' and consultant's pay is?
    This is interesting. So you are here whining and bitching about a policy proposal that you now admit you have actually no clue what it is?
    Why is it anybody's job to find it for you? Right health policy will swing you to voting SF will it?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,292 ✭✭✭RecordStraight


    Dan_Solo wrote: »
    Hahahahaha! You knew well that "a document" or "the document" had you scuppered so you went with just "document"! That's priceless!
    Uh...what? :confused:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,405 ✭✭✭LeeMajors


    Jawgap wrote: »
    So he arrived here in Autumn 2013 from Queensland as National Director of Acute Services and was appointed to head up the ED Taskforce in summer 2014.......on his watch the wait time in EDs was reduced, Full Capacity Protocols were introduced, and yes the people waiting on trolleys maxed out about a week before he left during the flu and Norovirus season.

    So in the six months he had the gig, by your measure, he achieved insufficient to retain his job.

    Well, at least we have the benchmark against which Shinner ministers will be measured.......or do they get held to a different standard?

    Out of interest, what salary was he on in 2013 and if it was cut, who cut it?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,292 ✭✭✭RecordStraight


    Dan_Solo wrote: »
    This is interesting. So you are here whining and bitching about a policy proposal that you now admit you have actually no clue what it is?
    Why is it anybody's job to find it for you? Right health policy will swing you to voting SF will it?
    Dan, you seem a bit manic since you came back from your ban.

    We seem to have a surfeit of policies from Sinn Fein on health - does it not strike you as problematic that a whole team of people on both sides of the argument can't figure out what the hell they are proposing?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 10,087 ✭✭✭✭Dan_Solo


    Jawgap wrote: »
    Well, at least we have the benchmark against which Shinner ministers will be measured.......or do they get held to a different standard?
    "Do SF ministers get held to a different standard"?
    You really just asked that? You are aware we're not in NI here?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,292 ✭✭✭RecordStraight


    LeeMajors wrote: »
    Out of interest, what salary was he on in 2013 and if it was cut, who cut it?
    I'll let Dan answer you.
    Dan_Solo wrote: »
    Why is it anybody's job to find it for you?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,292 ✭✭✭RecordStraight


    Dan_Solo wrote: »
    "Do SF ministers get held to a different standard"?
    You really just asked that? You are aware we're not in NI here?
    Who isn't in NI?

    Are you a partitionist, Dan? :eek:


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,405 ✭✭✭LeeMajors


    Happyman42 wrote: »
    Anybody whinging about money in a well paid job like that I would tell to leave/sack.
    If money is distracting you 9 months into the job then something was wrong with the decision to give you the job in the first place.

    Or the decision to take it.
    Maybe he thought he'd sneak in at that lever to get a new deal on the QT from Leo?
    Or maybe he wanted to move back to a better country with his missus and her new high paid position?


Advertisement