Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Boko Haram pledge allegiance to ISIS

2»

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,703 ✭✭✭IrishTrajan


    Nodin wrote: »
    You aren't too aware how oil prices work, I see.

    When supply outstrips demand, price goes up. When supply is larger than demand, price goes down. When supply and demand are in equilibrium, price remains unchanged.
    Nodin wrote: »
    The Saudi state does not finance IS.

    No, but people with ties to the Saud-family does.
    Nodin wrote: »
    Well, reading my post in the context of the post it was replying too would help you greatly. Less coffee and dollops of rage would not go astray either.

    "u mad?" Please stop. You argue against Western intervention and think Israel should butt out of Arab affairs, you argue for Western intervention in Arab affairs now. Pick an opinion and stick with it, populist.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    When supply outstrips demand, price goes up. When supply is larger than demand, price goes down. When supply and demand are in equilibrium, price remains unchanged. ..


    *sigh

    http://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/wp/2014/wp14218.pdf
    No, but people with ties to the Saud-family does..

    Given the size of the royal Saudi family, that's hardly a suprising, nor does it mean the Saudi state is involved.

    "u mad?" Please stop. You argue against Western intervention and think Israel should butt out of Arab affairs, you argue for Western intervention in Arab affairs now. Pick an opinion and stick with it, populist.

    A false dichotomy. You seem to think opposition to colonialism conflicts with opposition to an extremist groups multi-nation rampage.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,703 ✭✭✭IrishTrajan


    Nodin wrote: »

    And the reason it is volatile, is because a handful of places produce the most oil, so when supply looks likely to drop below demand, price goes up.

    If "expected" supply of oil drops, but supply still outstrips demand, price will fall. This is what happened when the Saudis reduced their oil production, but price remained low and they lost market share (which is why they oppose OPEC reducing production).
    Nodin wrote: »
    Given the size of the royal Saudi family, that's hardly a suprising, nor does it mean the Saudi state is involved.

    The fact Saudi Arabia is wahhabi, doesn't factor into your equation? Saudi Arabia, much like Turkey under Erdogan, supports ISIS.
    Nodin wrote: »
    A false dichotomy. You seem to think opposition to colonialism conflicts with opposition to an extremist groups multi-nation rampage.

    So, when the West does it, it's colonialism. When fifty thousand Muslims do it, armed and aided by Muslim Governments (Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, notably, Iran if you include the Shia militias) it's multi-national rampage? When the West does it, it's out of greed and we shouldn't get involved. When the Muslims do it, it's extremism and we should get involved?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    And the reason it is volatile, is because a handful of places produce the most oil, so when supply looks likely to drop below demand, price goes up..


    Yep, otherwise known as S P E C U L A T I O N.




    The fact Saudi Arabia is wahhabi, doesn't factor into your equation? Saudi Arabia, much like Turkey under Erdogan, supports ISIS.

    IS follow a far harsher ideology than wahabism.

    So, when the West does it, it's colonialism. When fifty thousand Muslims do it, armed and aided by Muslim Governments (Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, notably, Iran if you include the Shia militias) it's multi-national rampage? When the West does it, it's out of greed and we shouldn't get involved. When the Muslims do it, it's extremism and we should get involved?

    No idea what you're on about there.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,703 ✭✭✭IrishTrajan


    Nodin wrote: »
    Yep, otherwise known as S P E C U L A T I O N.

    The link you posted stated that speculative demand only has a minor effect on volatility, one which we should ignore in the short term.

    Nodin wrote: »
    IS follow a far harsher ideology than wahabism.

    Yea, beheading people for being apart of the wrong religion is much harsher than beheading someone for cheating in a relationship.

    The Saudis have beheadings, you know that, right?
    Nodin wrote: »
    No idea what you're on about there.

    Of course not.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin



    Yea, beheading people for being apart of the wrong religion is much harsher than beheading someone for cheating in a relationship.

    The Saudis have beheadings, you know that, right?.



    The French used have beheading. They must have been Wahabis of the same stripe too.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,703 ✭✭✭IrishTrajan


    Nodin wrote: »
    The French used have beheading. They must have been Wahabis of the same stripe too.

    Yea, as their method of the death penalty. Using the guillotine on someone for murdering another person, isn't in the same league as murdering someone for infidelity, or murdering someone for being born into the wrong religion.

    Talk about a false equivalency.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Yea, as their method of the death penalty. Using the guillotine on someone for murdering another person, isn't in the same league as murdering someone for infidelity, or murdering someone for being born into the wrong religion.

    Talk about a false equivalency.


    Not great at detecting nuance, humour or the like, are we?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,703 ✭✭✭IrishTrajan


    Nodin wrote: »
    Not great at detecting nuance, humour or the like, are we?

    No, your joke just sucked, and sounded exactly like an answer you would usually give. Unless you're saying your entire opinion is a joke, which I'd agree with.

    So, now that we've gotten past the semantics, can you give me an honest answer as to what your actual stance is? You're both against and in favour of Western intervention?

    It seems like you're using a double standard and set on holding the West accountable for everything.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    No, your joke just sucked, and sounded exactly like an answer you would usually give. Unless you're saying your entire opinion is a joke, which I'd agree with.

    So, now that we've gotten past the semantics, can you give me an honest answer as to what your actual stance is? You're both against and in favour of Western intervention?

    It seems like you're using a double standard and set on holding the West accountable for everything.


    It's hard to know whether to laugh or cry at this........

    Bottom of post 53 explains it. If theres anything there you don't understand, ask.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,703 ✭✭✭IrishTrajan


    Nodin wrote: »
    It's hard to know whether to laugh or cry at this........

    Bottom of post 53 explains it. If theres anything there you don't understand, ask.

    It doesn't explain it, it's you trying to twist words to excuse Muslim States for their actions, while blaming Western states for theirs. Exactly what I expected.


Advertisement