Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Strike On ! Proposed New Junior Cert **See Mod Warning Post #1**

12627282931

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 11,812 ✭✭✭✭evolving_doors


    2011abc wrote: »
    I think removal of external moderation shows it up as the ' face saving ' farce it is .

    Just to explore the issue a bit... I think most of us are in agreement that there's always a pressure to 'finish and revise' by May 3rd year!

    If the sit down june 3rd year traditional exams were lessened then it might free up more time . Maybe say for projects to cover and be done with some sections of the old course by, say may 2nd yr or feb-march 3rd year!

    Would that be so bad?

    Or is it just written exams in 3rd yr june we want, nothing more, nothing less?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,984 ✭✭✭acequion


    2011abc wrote: »
    I think removal of external moderation shows it up as the ' face saving ' farce it is .

    Yes I agree. Could there be a move to pairing down the state exam to save money, ie that the 60% might really become 100%,hence a smaller,cheaper to run JC? In the meantime teachers in schools would do our thing with projects and award a school cert and everyone's happy! I'm being tongue in cheek,obviously. Having to do these projects or whatever they dream up and correct them ourselves would create a whole load of hassle and undoubtedly extra work. And the students still only get a substandard JC!

    Though,I,for one don't want external moderation.Many would disagree with me,but as I have repeatedly said,it is outlandish to to subject teachers to that level of stress and expect them to do it for free. Anybody who does the state exams will know what an exhausting process correcting,having the scripts monitored,re-correcting,filling in the paper work actually is.And that's in July when you don't have to teach as well.

    So,I guess it's wait and see time again.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,984 ✭✭✭acequion


    Gebgbegb wrote: »
    Just to explore the issue a bit... I think most of us are in agreement that there's always a pressure to 'finish and revise' by May 3rd year!

    If the sit down june 3rd year traditional exams were lessened then it might free up more time . Maybe say for projects to cover and be done with some sections of the old course by, say may 2nd yr or feb-march 3rd year!

    Would that be so bad?

    Or is it just written exams in 3rd yr june we want, nothing more, nothing less?

    Interesting points here,but I,for one,will not aid and abet a money saving scheme just to let that coalition Govt off the hook. Because that's what it all amounts to at this stage. Let them off the hook and save them some money in the process. And we all know how their union pals may well help them to achieve that!

    The only decent thing to do is defer the whole thing until after the next election and then draw up a proper plan of reform. Educationally speaking,there is no urgency to make changes immediately.Where is the sense in rushing through a half baked plan! Financially speaking,if the Govt are under pressure from their buddies in Europe,well that's their problem.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 997 ✭✭✭MrJones1973


    I did threaten to leave but sadly didnt. While the ballot them to death policy seems to be the policy lets keep in mind without several ballots-the original deals would be it. Now I was one for keeping on rejecting and going all out if necessary but I have a thing called a backbone. Excluding those with repossession hanging over them I cant figure out why we never had a prolonged dispute. Married women second income?
    And Yes I have children. And Yes Im up to my xxxx in negative equity. And Yes I had a spouse who lost a job. And No I dont have an A or B Post.
    If this passes without a deal on resources tied into it..leave the ASTI but before you go-go down to Convention and vote for a motion calling for Gen Sec to be elected in future. A gift for the future.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,984 ✭✭✭acequion


    I did threaten to leave but sadly didnt. While the ballot them to death policy seems to be the policy lets keep in mind without several ballots-the original deals would be it. Now I was one for keeping on rejecting and going all out if necessary but I have a thing called a backbone. Excluding those with repossession hanging over them I cant figure out why we never had a prolonged dispute. Married women second income?
    And Yes I have children. And Yes Im up to my xxxx in negative equity. And Yes I had a spouse who lost a job. And No I dont have an A or B Post.
    If this passes without a deal on resources tied into it..leave the ASTI but before you go-go down to Convention and vote for a motion calling for Gen Sec to be elected in future. A gift for the future.


    What kind of a deal on resources are you talking about? They never have or never will give adequate resources. Even when the country was supposedly "awash" with money. So,I would actually be very wary of them throwing a few resources with god only knows what demands in return. Let them keep their measly resources and let us keep our standards!

    Like you, I would not have given up on the CP and HR campaigns either. No means No as far as I'm concerned, but unfortunately this idea of "keep at them til they cave in" seems to be the new culture. And yes,the Gen Sec absolutely should be elected!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,424 ✭✭✭✭km79


    Internet and phones all down for last few hours ! Only back now
    Any update since 9 news ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,984 ✭✭✭acequion


    km79 wrote: »
    Internet and phones all down for last few hours ! Only back now
    Any update since 9 news ?

    No,nothing new.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,018 ✭✭✭man_no_plan




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 370 ✭✭clunked



    And so the surrender begins


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,424 ✭✭✭✭km79


    Unions drop plans for another one-day strike over new Junior Certificate
    http://www.independent.ie/irish-news/education/unions-drop-plans-for-another-oneday-strike-over-new-junior-certificate-31029474.html
    there are also updates on rte, Irish times and TUI website.
    Nothing from asti. their communication with members is PATHETIC


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,775 ✭✭✭2011abc


    One of their chief concerns is that CSPE remains an examinable subject ?! Jesus wept Website down all last night and still this morning .
    Is it 140 or 160 k yer man is on ? And I'm sure he'll get a grand send off at end of year .I wonder how many dozen un(Der) employed NQTs subs will be required to service his pension ?
    Regretting my ASTI departure (after 20 + years) less and less by the week .They are a disgrace . This was planned from Day 1 .Not only did they take your 300+ sub they also willing sacrificed your two strike days pay knowing they had no intention of fighting this out .OPTICS / COSMETICS ! There is no base line( 6 weeks Summer holidays , in school till all hours , "free classes " a distant memory- it is so often forgotten we TEACH significantly more hours than international averages , the other nations teachers are just doing more admin throughout the day - now we will end up with worst of both worlds ) in this race to the bottom guys .Wake up , new union ?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,424 ✭✭✭✭km79


    2011abc wrote: »
    One of their chief concerns is that CSPE remains an examinable subject ?! Jesus wept Website down all last night and still this morning .
    Is it 140 or 160 k yer man is on ? And I'm sure he'll get a grand send off at end of year .I wonder how many dozen un(Der) employed NQTs subs will be required to service his pension ?
    Regretting my ASTI departure (after 20 + years) less and less by the week .They are a disgrace . This was planned from Day 1 .Not only did they take your 300+ sub they also willing sacrificed your two strike days pay knowing they had no intention of fighting this out .OPTICS / COSMETICS ! There is no base line in this race to the bottom guys .Wake up , new union ?

    summed up my thoughts EXACTLY!!!!!
    And on the CSPE thing where has that come from ? Its being painted as some kind of victory!!!! Every student and teacher I know who teaches it hates it and thinks its pointless........
    I wish they would just skip to the end game and get it over with it. Its done and dusted and has been for some time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 234 ✭✭Jamfa


    km79 wrote: »
    summed up my thoughts EXACTLY!!!!!
    And on the CSPE thing where has that come from ? Its being painted as some kind of victory!!!! Every student and teacher I know who teaches it hates it and thinks its pointless........
    I wish they would just skip to the end game and get it over with it. Its done and dusted and has been for some time.

    It's coming from Philip Irwin who is former vice chair of the CSPE Association & bizarrely has convinced some people that the subject is key to student wellbeing!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 997 ✭✭✭MrJones1973


    Hold yer horses people. All that is on hold is the strike. They are asking for more talks. Regarding resources-Lets see whats on offer. Do I expect them to be decent-no way but this is game of chess. Let them put their offer on table and then we can dissect it.

    I have not great hope in the membership but lets play this to the end.If the members vote for this with inadequate resources-lets all walk away then!
    Deal?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,018 ✭✭✭man_no_plan


    Jan says she'll push ahead! http://www.rte.ie/news/2015/0228/683447-junior-cycle/

    I have seen the document from 12th February but there have been some alterations I understand/ Does anyone have any detail on these or is the document available? The indo had the first one before anyone else, theres speculation in the press about whats in and whats out but nothing definitive.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,775 ✭✭✭2011abc


    Hold yer horses people. All that is on hold is the strike. They are asking for more talks. Regarding resources-Lets see whats on offer. Do I expect them to be decent-no way but this is game of chess. Let them put their offer on table and then we can dissect it.

    I have not great hope in the membership but lets play this to the end.If the members vote for this with inadequate resources-lets all walk away then!
    Deal?

    No , while a certain smallish fraction of teachers are subservient and a larger amount complacent there are more than enough with fire in their bellies at this stage to defeat this ongoing onslaught on a level playing field .Its blindingly obvious at this stage that Head Office has turned the ASTI into an a subsection of the Department .
    Members wont be ALLOWED defeat this , just like with HRA ...How can it be that well under a decade after ousting (with great difficulty, including a six figure pay off) one despot another has done this to us ?!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,984 ✭✭✭acequion


    2011abc wrote: »
    One of their chief concerns is that CSPE remains an examinable subject ?! Jesus wept Website down all last night and still this morning .
    Is it 140 or 160 k yer man is on ? And I'm sure he'll get a grand send off at end of year .I wonder how many dozen un(Der) employed NQTs subs will be required to service his pension ?
    Regretting my ASTI departure (after 20 + years) less and less by the week .They are a disgrace . This was planned from Day 1 .Not only did they take your 300+ sub they also willing sacrificed your two strike days pay knowing they had no intention of fighting this out .OPTICS / COSMETICS ! There is no base line( 6 weeks Summer holidays , in school till all hours , "free classes " a distant memory- it is so often forgotten we TEACH significantly more hours than international averages , the other nations teachers are just doing more admin throughout the day - now we will end up with worst of both worlds ) in this race to the bottom guys .Wake up , new union ?

    Ah come off it will you!! What help to any of us is your prediction of apocalypse?? The apathetic and fearful are one extreme but jesus,you're the other!! And either approach gets us NOWHERE. Good for you if you're glad you left the union,but let the rest of us fight this one out!

    Mrwhite is right [nice ring to that :)] All that's happened is that the strike is on hold while talks continue. We always knew that they weren't going to tell them to shove it [which is exactly what they should do]. We always knew that they were anxious to keep talking,typical of the conciliatory,servile stance of present day PS unions, more's the pity, and we don't really trust them because of it. But,the final decision will lie,as always with the members. They were the ones who sold out on CPA and HRA. Who,knows,maybe they've really had enough this time and will vote it down. The fact is that nothing has really changed since yesterday so let's just wait and see.

    And less of the drama please, not good for the nerves! :eek: :;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,438 ✭✭✭solerina


    km79 wrote: »
    summed up my thoughts EXACTLY!!!!!
    And on the CSPE thing where has that come from ? Its being painted as some kind of victory!!!! Every student and teacher I know who teaches it hates it and thinks its pointless........
    I wish they would just skip to the end game and get it over with it. Its done and dusted and has been for some time.


    I don't teach CSPE currently but I have done in the past (for 5 years) and I always really enjoyed it and wouldn't mind teaching it again !! To make it part of this whole fiasco is a joke though.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,937 ✭✭✭implausible


    There seems to be a very simple bargain offered at the end - we'll cooperate if you defer the English syllabus. At last, the elephant in the room is being looked at - that the new Junior Cycle has technically started already in one subject. I, for one, see this as good news.

    I don't know if agreeing to drop the strike day at this stage was a good tactical move; it might have got everyone's ass in gear if both parties knew there was a deadline looming.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,984 ✭✭✭acequion


    There seems to be a very simple bargain offered at the end - we'll cooperate if you defer the English syllabus. At last, the elephant in the room is being looked at - that the new Junior Cycle has technically started already in one subject. I, for one, see this as good news.

    I don't know if agreeing to drop the strike day at this stage was a good tactical move; it might have got everyone's ass in gear if both parties knew there was a deadline looming.

    As an English teacher,any deferral of English would be good news for me too.It would be very unfair to force English teachers to go it alone while the rest of the subjects get deferred.

    But all is still up in the air and the blustering by O Sullivan and indeed the rest of her cronies in their soon to be defunct party,is breathtaking!


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 57 ✭✭Frankly frank


    Will the unions save us the usual spectacle and charade by NOT inviting current Minister to conference?
    No they will continue to waste members time and money.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 370 ✭✭clunked


    An appallingly one sided, inaccurate article by the Irish Times today. Was probably written by a Government 'advisor' to cause mischief.
    http://www.irishtimes.com/news/education/internal-politics-in-teacher-unions-has-become-obstacle-1.2121958


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,775 ✭✭✭2011abc


    "Dr Travers is no department stooge. Yet he has emphatically rejected what he called the “well-articulated concern” that school-based assessment would expose teachers to undue pressure or corruption."
    Well thats that then .Thanks for the reassurance Joe (author of the drivel linked above)and Dr. T!Not the faintest possibility of misguided parents and bullying principals hassling part time teachers .Simply couldnt happen ...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,018 ✭✭✭man_no_plan


    All you need do is read that the unions had their chance at the ncca! Sure they were shat on by Ruari too as he steam rolled in his reform.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,018 ✭✭✭man_no_plan




  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,480 ✭✭✭Chancer3001


    We are getting slaughtered in the press. Everyone making out like we are the only "fools" who are being sticklers, standing selfishly in the way of progress.

    We need our union to be more vocal.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,351 ✭✭✭katydid


    2011abc wrote: »
    Not the faintest possibility of misguided parents and bullying principals hassling part time teachers .Simply couldnt happen ...

    No, there isn't. If teachers act in a professional way. That is a red herring.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,483 ✭✭✭History Queen


    katydid wrote: »
    No, there isn't. If teachers act in a professional way. That is a red herring.

    As someone on a temporary contract I can assure you it is not a red herring. If my principal says "jump" i say " how high". No matter how many extra curricular activities or school committees im involved in there's always another one that my principal thinks I'd be "interested" in or "would look good on my CV" or my predecessor took care of so naturallly im expected to do likewise.

    Meanwhile I obviously also have classes to teach and exams to correct, as do all my colleagues.

    Why do I not object? My eyes are on the prize. I want to advance in my career. I want a job next year. I want to teach.

    I dare you to call my professionalism into question. Or to suggest that there aren't 100s more in my position.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 6,351 ✭✭✭katydid


    As someone on a temporary contract I can assure you it is not a red herring. If my principal says "jump" i say " how high". No matter how many extra curricular activities or school committees im involved in there's always another one that my principal thinks I'd be "interested" in or "would look good on my CV" or my predecessor took care of so naturallly im expected to do likewise.

    Meanwhile I obviously also have classes to teach and exams to correct, as do all my colleagues.

    Why do I not object? My eyes are on the prize. I want to advance in my career. I want a job next year. I want to teach.

    I dare you to call my professionalism into question. Or to suggest that there aren't 100s more in my position.

    If the material you're assessing is properly devised, the marking scheme is clear, and you have the backing of internal and external moderation, no principal in the world can put pressure on you.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 48,424 ✭✭✭✭km79


    katydid wrote: »
    If the material you're assessing is properly devised, the marking scheme is clear, and you have the backing of internal and external moderation, no principal in the world can put pressure on you.

    I wish we all lived in your world


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement