Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Scanning

1234689

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,465 ✭✭✭supersean1999


    Iv a few lleyn cross ewes myself. i must keep a check and see if they scan much higher than the hiltex one.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,324 ✭✭✭Sheep breeder


    scanned the last of the ewes two weeks ago and have 1.7 in them and a really good scan with the young ewes with a single and the older with doubles and only 3 triplets which are all older ewes with plenty of milk,when we put out the rams we would have being very happy with this result.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 193 ✭✭skoger


    Scanned the lowland ewes during the week. Ended up with 1.8 and only one empty. Happy enough


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 320 ✭✭premier10


    Scanned today, very happy, no empties.
    7 Singles
    38 Doubles
    7 Triplets
    Shocked at amount of triplets and he even said to watch 2 more as they could be triplets in them too.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,244 ✭✭✭sea12


    premier10 wrote: »
    Scanned today, very happy, no empties.
    7 Singles
    38 Doubles
    7 Triplets
    Shocked at amount of triplets and he even said to watch 2 more as they could be triplets in them too.

    Super results


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,497 ✭✭✭rangler1


    Scanned the first of the crossbreds this morning,
    16 triplets,
    28 singles,
    137 doubles,
    none barren...1.95


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,272 ✭✭✭Cran


    rangler1 wrote: »
    Scanned the first of the crossbreds this morning,
    16 triplets,
    28 singles,
    137 doubles,
    none barren...1.95

    none barren from 180 that is some result, what breed mix are they?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,244 ✭✭✭sea12


    rangler1 wrote: »
    Scanned the first of the crossbreds this morning,
    16 triplets,
    28 singles,
    137 doubles,
    none barren...1.95

    Great results rangler. Everyone seems to be having a good scan again this year.
    Have to wait another few weeks to do mine as don't lamb until 1st April


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,497 ✭✭✭rangler1


    Cran wrote: »
    none barren from 180 that is some result, what breed mix are they?

    All those ewes would be 70%texel/30%Lleyn, next batch will be more Lleyn in them, I lamb my ewe lambs in april so I don't mind leaving the rams with the adult ewes until the 1st week in December, which keeps empty ewes to a minimum.
    Ewes are looking really well this year


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 367 ✭✭farming93


    Scanned 33 (mostly lleyn pb or lleyn cross) today incl Ewe lambs:
    9 singles
    19 twins
    5 triplets
    None empty
    Most of the ewe lambs had twins in them while most of the 2 year olds had singles. Happy with the results.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,524 ✭✭✭grassroot1


    rangler1 wrote: »
    Scanned the first of the crossbreds this morning,
    16 triplets,
    28 singles,
    137 doubles,
    none barren...1.95

    That's a great scan and you have them the right way, not an over dose of triplets good luck lambing


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,497 ✭✭✭rangler1


    farming93 wrote: »
    Scanned 33 (mostly lleyn pb or lleyn cross) today incl Ewe lambs:
    9 singles
    19 twins
    5 triplets
    None empty
    Most of the ewe lambs had twins in them while most of the 2 year olds had singles. Happy with the results.

    Nice result, we usually don't have many doubles here in the ewe lambs, but the ones that do usually have a single the following year


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 367 ✭✭farming93


    rangler1 wrote: »
    Nice result, we usually don't have many doubles here in the ewe lambs, but the ones that do usually have a single the following year

    Thanks! The scanner said the ewes are all in savage condition I reckon a CS of about 3.5 on average so he said to be careful on the amount of meal I give them. Any advice on feeding the ewe lambs? they are lambing from about March onwards.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,497 ✭✭✭rangler1


    farming93 wrote: »
    Thanks! The scanner said the ewes are all in savage condition I reckon a CS of about 3.5 on average so he said to be careful on the amount of meal I give them. Any advice on feeding the ewe lambs? they are lambing from about March onwards.

    You shouldn't have any trouble with lambs being too big in the ewe lambs carrying doubles, If you're feeding silage they'd probably be alright with .25kg ration at 6 wks from lambing .5kg at 4 wks out from lambing going up to .75kg at 2 wks.
    Ewe lambs carrying singles on good silage, probably wouldn't need meal till 3or 4 wks out and then only about half the doubles amount.
    The only roughage fed here is straw, so I'd be feeding them 50% more meal than that.
    The two year olds scanned with singles....what did they have last year


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 335 ✭✭ihatewinter


    rangler1 wrote: »
    You shouldn't have any trouble with lambs being too big in the ewe lambs carrying doubles, If you're feeding silage they'd probably be alright with .25kg ration at 6 wks from lambing .5kg at 4 wks out from lambing going up to .75kg at 2 wks.
    Ewe lambs carrying singles on good silage, probably wouldn't need meal till 3or 4 wks out and then only about half the doubles amount.
    The only roughage fed here is straw, so I'd be feeding them 50% more meal than that.

    What's the reason for feeding straw only and a lot of concentrate? Would the cost not be too much and eat into profits?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,382 ✭✭✭jfh


    Scanned ewes, hoggets won't be scanned for another month.
    25 singles
    22 triples
    58 double
    1 quad
    3 barren

    Happy enough, not lambing until mid March, lot of singles


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,382 ✭✭✭jfh


    Scanned ewes, hoggets won't be scanned for another month.
    25 singles
    22 triples
    58 double
    1 quad
    3 barren

    Happy enough, not lambing until mid March, lot of singles


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,497 ✭✭✭rangler1


    What's the reason for feeding straw only and a lot of concentrate? Would the cost not be too much and eat into profits?

    It takes about .5kg meal/day extra while they're in, so about €14 for 120 days plus half a round bale of straw for bedding/eating for the winter to replace silage....that's only €20, would a ewe survive on a bale silage for the winter for €20, there's not much difference in the cost of wintering.
    But the main reason is that its easier, cleaner and drier and the sheds aren't suited to mechanical feeding


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 367 ✭✭farming93


    [
    The two year olds scanned with singles....what did they have last year[/QUOTE]

    The two year olds that lambed last year all had doubles but in each case only one lamb survived. There was always one big and one small and it was usually the big one that died. I didnt get anything scanned last year so perhaps I was off on the feeding but I still thought it was unusual about the size difference, any thoughts?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,349 ✭✭✭razor8


    I would put different sizes down to mineral deficiencies, but not sure which one causes it

    I weigh lambs at birth and I even see a kg difference in lambs that look exactly the same size


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 367 ✭✭farming93


    I havent heard of that one before, I may leave out mineral buckets with them this year so and hopefully that will be a bit of a booster to them. Do you weigh the lambs every year and if so what is the advantages of this?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,349 ✭✭✭razor8


    farming93 wrote: »
    I havent heard of that one before, I may leave out mineral buckets with them this year so and hopefully that will be a bit of a booster to them. Do you weigh the lambs every year and if so what is the advantages of this?

    A good min drench might be enough

    Last two years I have, weigh and tag all lambs at birth and use TGM software, the heaviest lambs in general seem to be the first away, it's probably not a huge benefit but I try and keep ewe lambs from ewes that have two even heavy lambs every year that lamb unaided


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,497 ✭✭✭rangler1


    farming93 wrote: »
    [The two year olds that lambed last year all had doubles but in each case only one lamb survived. There was always one big and one small and it was usually the big one that died. I didnt get anything scanned last year so perhaps I was off on the feeding but I still thought it was unusual about the size difference, any thoughts?

    The experts claim that those uneven pairs start off as a triplet, two in one horn of the uterus and one in the other side, one of the two gets reabsorbed and affects the other and the lamb in the other side thrives on.....why the bigger ones died, I don't know, I'd be going to the lab if if I was losing a lot of them...presume they were vaccinated


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,796 ✭✭✭paddysdream


    Scanned maincrop plus ewe lambs this week.Earlies done a while ago.

    Early(end of Jan.);
    2 dry.
    33 singles.
    43 doubles.
    4 trebles.
    Thats 1.6 or so.Happy enough for earlies.

    Maincrop(early March);
    7 dry.
    207 singles.
    142 doubles.
    18 trebles.
    Thats 1.45.
    Pretty poor considering ewes had an easy year and looked good going to the ram.Suppose looking at them over the last few weeks they seemed to be in very good condition which usually indicates(well here anyways!) a sheep flock under less pressure because carrying fewer lambs.
    Lot of young ewes(mainly 2nd or 3rd crop) and every one of them reared lambs last year.No second chances here.In fairness kept a good few ewes that would normally have culled on age grounds due to the fact that looking at them was tempted to say they would survive another year and still make a decent cull price.

    Ewe lambs(mid to late March)
    Plus a few ewes thin etc after weaning and put to the ram late.These got preferential treatment inc. good grass all year.

    Ewe lambs;
    5 dry
    52 singles
    33 doubles
    Scanning 1.3.Grand for ewe lambs.Prefer dead lamb from them rather than scanning dry.

    Thin ewes(mainly 2 year olds with a few elderly ladies to supply foster lambs for ewe lambs I hope!)
    1 dry
    9 singles.
    19 doubles
    6 trebles
    Thats 1.85.Happy enough as long as they have enough milk at lambing.


    Overall disappointed with main bunch but thats all I can do for this year.Might tempt me to try a Belclare ram for the coming year !


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 367 ✭✭farming93


    rangler1 wrote: »
    The experts claim that those uneven pairs start off as a triplet, two in one horn of the uterus and one in the other side, one of the two gets reabsorbed and affects the other and the lamb in the other side thrives on.....why the bigger ones died, I don't know, I'd be going to the lab if if I was losing a lot of them...presume they were vaccinated
    Yep they were all vaccinated with an 8 in 1. I'll keep a good eye on them this year


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34 whitetail


    Hi all scanned the mule ewes today 162 2 Barren, 126 Doubles,19 triplets,1 quad and 14 Singles hope the weather holds up!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,244 ✭✭✭sea12


    whitetail wrote: »
    Hi all scanned the mule ewes today 162 2 Barren, 126 Doubles,19 triplets,1 quad and 14 Singles hope the weather holds up!

    That's some result. Think there is going to be allot of lambs next year


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,272 ✭✭✭Cran


    Have to say lambing ewes inside can be a miserable dehearting job harder to get it right, give me 700 outside in spring over 30 inside in January anytime. Now that's off my chest spend next 12 months forgetting negatives and work on improving :o


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 34 whitetail


    sea12 wrote: »
    That's some result. Think there is going to be allot of lambs next year

    Scanning man said alot of multiple's this year hope the hoggets scan less next round.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,796 ✭✭✭paddysdream


    Cran wrote: »
    Have to say lambing ewes inside can be a miserable dehearting job harder to get it right, give me 700 outside in spring over 30 inside in January anytime. Now that's off my chest spend next 12 months forgetting negatives and work on improving :o

    Will take any of those little pink headed ram lambs you don't want off of you if they are causing you grief.
    Won't even charge for the privilege.Will give the young lad something to do rearing a few on the bottle these long dark evenings!


Advertisement