Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Please note that it is not permitted to have referral links posted in your signature. Keep these links contained in the appropriate forum. Thank you.

https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2055940817/signature-rules

Dash cam saves your ass (no Roundabout stuff please :)

1…202203205207208…255

Comments

  • #6122
    gutteruu
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,064 ✭✭✭gutteruu


    irishmover wrote: »
    Since when is overtaking two vehicles at the same time, with the front one indicating to turn right, a harmless manoeuvre?

    Since they were plottering along with no regard for anyone else. Poster was doing the usual Irish thing of leaving no room for anyone to pass so you have to pass the full group. Second car had no intention of passing at any point so cars behind became frustrated. Its clear to me he began overtaking both cars before yaris indicated. Another example of slow "safe" drivers causing $hit


  • #6123
    corktina
    Closed Accounts Posts: 17,733 ✭✭✭✭corktina


    you may not overtake across a side road, which would explain why the second car was not overtaking...


  • #6124
    wonski
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,685 ✭✭✭✭wonski


    gutteruu wrote: »
    Since they were plottering along with no regard for anyone else. Poster was doing the usual Irish thing of leaving no room for anyone to pass so you have to pass the full group. Second car had no intention of passing at any point so cars behind became frustrated. Its clear to me he began overtaking both cars before yaris indicated. Another example of slow "safe" drivers causing $hit

    We don't even know what spees they were doing and what the limit was.

    Yaris was about to turn right and indicated early enough. No need to speed up if you know you are going to brake soon.

    There are many reasons people go slower, they might not be famliar with the area etc. We all whant to drive as fast as we prefer but it is not always possible. What is slow for you might be fast for someone else.

    Overtaking car signalling turning right is a big no imo, no matter if it is slow Yaris or BMW doing 100 km/h.


  • #6125
    Hammer Archer
    Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 11,559 Mod ✭✭✭✭Hammer Archer


    gutteruu wrote: »
    Since they were plottering along with no regard for anyone else. Poster was doing the usual Irish thing of leaving no room for anyone to pass so you have to pass the full group. Second car had no intention of passing at any point so cars behind became frustrated. Its clear to me he began overtaking both cars before yaris indicated. Another example of slow "safe" drivers causing $hit
    Ah the usual Irish thing of "the driver in front of me forced me to overtake dangerously at a junction with a car coming towards us".


  • #6126
    Bio Mech
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,046 ✭✭✭Bio Mech


    gutteruu wrote: »
    Since they were plottering along with no regard for anyone else. Poster was doing the usual Irish thing of leaving no room for anyone to pass so you have to pass the full group. Second car had no intention of passing at any point so cars behind became frustrated. Its clear to me he began overtaking both cars before yaris indicated. Another example of slow "safe" drivers causing $hit

    Its clear to me that you like to state "facts" based purely on your own supposition.


  • Advertisement
  • #6127
    Jesus.
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,794 ✭✭✭Jesus.


    Hammer Archer wrote: »
    Ah the usual Irish thing of "the driver in front of me forced me to overtake dangerously at a junction with a car coming towards us".

    There's nothing Irish about it though Hammer. If you look up an English, French, Spanish site like this, you can be sure they've the very same dashcam thread running with the very same carry on. Motorists do dodgy sh*t the World over. We're no better or worse overall here than anywhere else.


  • #6128
    Gazzmonkey
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 816 ✭✭✭Gazzmonkey


    Really wish I had a dash cam last night, at around 18:15 I was traveling from Rathnew to Rathdrum and was behind a blue 03 Passat that was swerving all over the road. He / she even hit the ditch on one occasion sending bits of plastic shooting across the road.

    Really early to be drunk I thought.


  • #6129
    Tragedy
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,056 ✭✭✭Tragedy


    The overtaker waited until visibility was good, overtook in good time leaving plenty of space between him and the cars he was overtaking. There's only 4 seconds between the Yaris indicating and the car appearing along side and in that situation, jamming on is as (more?) dangerous than completing the legal overtaking maneuver.

    The car overtaking also completed the overtake before the sideroad.

    Much ado about nothing - although it would be different if the car had started the overtake after the Yaris had started indicating.
    Which quite obviously isn't the case here, given the speed differential when the Leon appears.


  • #6130
    Jesus.
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,794 ✭✭✭Jesus.


    Tragedy wrote: »
    There's only 4 seconds between the Yaris indicating and the car appearing along side

    4 seconds is a long time in driving terms. He must have been in a low powered car for it to take him so long to complete the manoeuvre.


  • #6131
    Sterling Archer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,251 ✭✭✭Sterling Archer


    Gazzmonkey wrote: »
    Really wish I had a dash cam last night, at around 18:15 I was traveling from Rathnew to Rathdrum and was behind a blue 03 Passat that was swerving all over the road. He / she even hit the ditch on one occasion sending bits of plastic shooting across the road.

    Really early to be drunk I thought.

    Might be the event that pushes you to ask santa for one :D

    Did you report it?


  • Advertisement
  • #6132
    Tragedy
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,056 ✭✭✭Tragedy


    Jesus. wrote: »
    4 seconds is a long time in driving terms. He must have been in a low powered car for it to take him so long to complete the manoeuvre.
    4 seconds is nothing in an overtake. Some people really just want a reason to be hysterically angry.

    How long do you think it takes a car to go from 70-110km/h (or 60-100, or 80-120)? It's a lot more than 4 seconds for almost every car in Ireland.

    Unless you're driving dangerously, it takes several seconds just to pull out to overtake, nevermind to actually start to overtake.

    Go on Jesus., tell us how it is possible to overtake a car in less than 4seconds unless you're driving like a nutter with a superbike/sports car?


  • #6133
    Sterling Archer
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,251 ✭✭✭Sterling Archer


    corktina wrote: »
    you may not overtake across a side road, which would explain why the second car was not overtaking...

    Looks more like the entrance to an premises
    Until the OP clarifies if it's a road of like I've stated an entrance to a premises we might as well be flinging poop at the wall.

    Doesn't the RSA advise to check, move out, accelerate and complete the move without delay.


  • #6134
    Jesus.
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,794 ✭✭✭Jesus.


    Tragedy wrote: »
    Go on Jesus., tell us how it is possible to overtake a car in less than 4seconds unless you're driving like a nutter with a superbike/sports car?

    You said it was 4 seconds after the Yaris indicated that he appeared. That's what I'm commenting on. His overtake time would've been more than four seconds anyway. He must have seen the Yaris indicate when he began pulling out.

    I do agree with you that people get all hysterical about nothing. This wasn't really that bad IMO. He probably still should've seen the indicator though.


  • #6135
    Tragedy
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,056 ✭✭✭Tragedy


    I've overtaken thousands of cars on the old N7 and the N69 to Listowel. Genuinely thousands.
    You have a really incredibly unrealistic expectation of how long it takes to overtake - and God help you the first time you try to overtake a car, pull out, discover the laws of physics and bang head on into an approaching car because it takes a surprisingly significant amount of time to overtake.


  • #6136
    Jesus.
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,794 ✭✭✭Jesus.


    What are you on about? I've overtaken thousands in my time too. What I haven't done though, is move out and then see someone indicating right and continue to go after them, reaching them 4 seconds later. If I pulled out and seen someone indicating right I'd ease off and go back in.

    No big deal though


  • #6137
    hullaballoo
    Administrators, Entertainment Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 18,793 Admin ✭✭✭✭✭hullaballoo


    I'd say I've overtaken billions tbh.


  • #6138
    Tragedy
    Closed Accounts Posts: 4,056 ✭✭✭Tragedy


    Jesus. wrote: »
    What are you on about? I've overtaken thousands in my time too. What I haven't done though, is move out and then see someone indicating right and continue to go after them, reaching them 4 seconds later. If I pulled out and seen someone indicating right I'd ease off and go back in.

    No big deal though

    You've overtaken thousands and believe that 4 seconds in an overtake constitutes the majority of an overtake?

    When the car flicked on it's indicators, the Leon was already alongside the poster's car in the video.

    You've portrayed it as if the car only pulled out to overtake after the indicators are on.

    You've suggested that 4 seconds is loads of time to overtake and that he must be in a low powered car for it to take him so long to perform the overtake.

    In short, if you drive like you post you'd be dead a long time ago. Most deaths are related to overtaking, with a significant amount relating to poor judgement in the time and distance necessary to overtake. Most people underestimate it, and here we have Jesus doing just that.


  • #6139
    Jesus.
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,794 ✭✭✭Jesus.


    Never said 4 seconds is loads of time to overtake. I said 4 seconds is a long time in driving. As you said yourself, it was 4 seconds before the car came alongside after the Yaris indicated, not complete the overtake.

    If he was already alongside the posters car then why'd it take him 4 more seconds to appear in the screen?


  • #6140
    gutteruu
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,064 ✭✭✭gutteruu


    corktina wrote: »
    you may not overtake across a side road, which would explain why the second car was not overtaking...

    Second car did not hold back because of any side road. Its totally invisible at that point, safe dotted white line, no sign posts to indicate any road of any kind, no slip road or hatch markings. Massively wide road. It is literally the perfect place to overtake. Couldn't be more ideal. Your just arguing for the sake of it.


  • #6141
    Ken.
    Closed Accounts Posts: 12,898 ✭✭✭✭Ken.


    Can I just say to everyone getting on to sherfin, just because their is a car in front of you does not mean it HAS to be overtaken. Seems to be what everyone is getting at.


  • Advertisement
  • #6142
    gutteruu
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,064 ✭✭✭gutteruu


    ken wrote: »
    Can I just say to everyone getting on to sherfin, just because their is a car in front of you does not mean it HAS to be overtaken. Seems to be what everyone is getting at.

    No we're not. We're saying the person he called "impatient" and posted a video of did nothing wrong. This has nothing to do sherfin passing anyone? We're talking about the other car. Point I'm making about sherfin is he left no room for anyone else to pass him, so cars behind would have to pass numerous cars to have any chance of making progress.


  • #6143
    Jesus.
    Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,794 ✭✭✭Jesus.


    gutteruu wrote: »
    sherfin is he left no room for anyone else to pass him.

    Was Sherfin tailgating that Yaris?


  • #6144
    MarkAnthony
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,934 ✭✭✭MarkAnthony


    WOW and I got a bollocking for the cycling argument :P This looks like its gonna go on for a while. To be absolutely fair (although I personally think the guy overtaking was impatient) Sherfin does seem a wee bit close, again IMHO.

    One more thing - there is no way that maneuver was one that was considered for any length of time by someone stuck behind Sherfin - that was someone roaring up behind and overtaking and as such the Yaris was indicating before the move was made. That or that class or crappy hatchback accelerate a damn sight quicker that I thought.

    Not overly convinced on the space left for the car on the opposing carriageway either but that might just be a perception thing from the footage.


  • #6145
    Gosub
    Closed Accounts Posts: 874 ✭✭✭Gosub


    I'd say I've overtaken brazillians. :P


  • #6146
    MarkAnthony
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,934 ✭✭✭MarkAnthony


    Gosub wrote: »
    I'd say I've overtaken brazillians. :P

    There has to be some sort of razor pun in here.


  • #6147
    BMJD
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,694 ✭✭✭BMJD


    How does anyone know what nationality either of the drivers was?


  • #6148
    MarkAnthony
    Closed Accounts Posts: 6,934 ✭✭✭MarkAnthony


    BMJD wrote: »
    How does anyone know what nationality either of the drivers was?

    One of us is missing the point of the most recent joke in this thread and I'm not entirely convinced it's you.


  • #6149
    BMJD
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,694 ✭✭✭BMJD


    MarkAnthony wrote: »
    One of us is missing the point of the most recent joke in this thread and I'm not entirely convinced it's you.

    I wasn't referring to your Brazilians :D


  • #6150
    Gosub
    Closed Accounts Posts: 874 ✭✭✭Gosub


    BMJD wrote: »
    I wasn't referring to your Brazilians :D
    Hey! They're my Brazilians! :D


  • Advertisement
  • #6151
    Sherfin
    Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 204 ✭✭Sherfin


    Hi guys, just in from work, sorry, didn't think it would start a debate.
    @IrishMover, yes N2 at Balrath
    Both the Yaris and I had just joined the N2 from Kentstown only about a minute before this. Limit 100 Yaris is doing about 80.
    There's a bit of a rise coming up followed by a long straight, where I was going to pass when I was 100% sure it was safe
    (Yes, I might be a bit careful sometimes) Don't think I was tailgating, maybe just the cam
    The car overtaking was already on the N2 before we joined and due to the Yaris they soon caught up.
    They also overtook at least one car behind me (maybe 2), I pulled left so that the car just behind me would see that the Yaris is turning in, and in case the Yaris didn't check their side mirrors before crossing
    It's not a side road btw.
    All in all it wasn't a huge deal.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement