Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Ian Paisley has died

12021222426

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,059 ✭✭✭✭osarusan


    Somehow Republican and nationalists are to blame for all the atrocities this country has been through.

    Which posts on this thread said that?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,412 ✭✭✭Shakespeare's Sister


    osarusan wrote: »
    Which posts on this thread said that?
    That's totally a general consensus on Boards and elsewhere. I once heard someone talking about a loyalist shooting and how awful an atrocity that was by "the IRA".
    People have been led to believe down the years here that the conflict in the north was entirely one-sided - the republican one. Nationalists up there have felt terrible alienation from people down here whom they'd have thought would support them.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,059 ✭✭✭✭osarusan


    That's totally a general consensus on Boards and elsewhere.
    I completely disagree.

    just as I see more people complaining about vegetarians who won't stop being spouting self-righteous nonsense than I actually see vegetarians spouting self-righteous nonsense, I see more people on boards commenting on West Brit IRA-blaming types than I actually see West Brit IRA-blaming types.

    Of course, it all depends on people's definition of West brit IRA-blaming types.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,412 ✭✭✭Shakespeare's Sister


    osarusan wrote: »
    I completely disagree.

    just as I see more people complaining about vegetarians who won't stop being spouting self-righteous nonsense than I actually see vegetarians spouting self-righteous nonsense, I see more people on boards commenting on West Brit IRA-blaming types than I actually see West Brit IRA-blaming types.

    Of course, it all depends on people's definition of West brit IRA-blaming types.
    I agree fully on the vegetarian thing :) but have a look through threads on the North - the dismissal of the nationalist community is definitely there. Have a look at this thread alone, for nonsensical praising of Paisley.
    (I don't use and have never used the term "west Brit" - I don't have any issue with a person being a unionist and I despise the IRA; I am simply referring to Irish people who are massively ignorant about the North, or else want to be Conor Cruise O'Brien/Eoghan Harris types, and deem the atrocities to be republican only; it's definitely there and I find it surprising that you don't see it).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 228 ✭✭jimmymal


    Esel wrote: »
    You really need to find the Creative Writing forum and post there.

    Then, get acquainted with your Return key. Press it twice every so often (or more often).

    Paragraphs, and all that.

    And i would say unto you, you need to get acquainted with the style of trent! Legend


    Any relación pablo, to padraig?
    Or are you, like the rest of us, inspired by trents magnificence?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,059 ✭✭✭✭osarusan


    (I don't use and have never used the term "west Brit" - I don't have any issue with a person being a unionist and I despise the IRA; I am simply referring to Irish people who are massively ignorant about the North, or else want to be Conor Cruise O'Brien/Eoghan Harris types, and deem the atrocities to be republican only; it's definitely there and I find it surprising that you don't see it).

    I didn't say it wasn't there. It is there, but I don't think it's remotely close to a 'general consensus on boards and elsewhere.'

    Have a look through old threads yourself - you will see that threads started to highlight some less than appealing aspect of republicanism are derailed just as quickly, by just as many posters, and with just as pathetic whataboutery, as the other way round.

    I find it surprising that you don't see that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,412 ✭✭✭Shakespeare's Sister


    osarusan wrote: »
    I didn't say it wasn't there. It is there, but I don't think it's remotely close to a 'general consensus on boards and elsewhere.'
    Fair point.
    Have a look through old threads yourself - you will see that threads started to highlight some less than appealing aspect of republicanism are derailed just as quickly, by just as many posters, and with just as pathetic whataboutery, as the other way round.

    I find it surprising that you don't see that.
    I didn't say I didn't.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,059 ✭✭✭✭osarusan


    Now, we may be talking at cross-purposes here.

    You might be talking about people who are so ignorant about the north as to actually believe that, for example, Greysteel was a massacre carried out by Republicans - in which case I'd agree that such ignorance exists, but i don't think it's that widespread.

    I'm talking about the people who know who carried out these individual atrocities, but blame the other side for everything anyway because 'it's all their fault'.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 74 ✭✭HeathenWolf


    People have been led to believe down the years here that the conflict in the north was entirely one-sided - the republican one. Nationalists up there have felt terrible alienation from people down here whom they'd have thought would support them.

    It's not the people's fault. The Irish government tried all they could to censor and prevent media coverage of the happenings up here at the time.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,097 ✭✭✭Herb Powell


    It's a bad sign when Martin McGuinness proves himself to have more dignity and respect than half the posters of AH

    Paisley deserves no respect.

    Fucck him, and fucck all of the people on here trying to defend him. You don't look better for doing that, you look like a cunnt trying to defend a cunnt.

    That's all I have to say about this.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 23,246 ✭✭✭✭Dyr


    The whole country was split with people arguing, I always thought the best thing that could have happened here is that the 16 Rising never occurred and the Home Rule Act 14 came in and we got on with it with progressive Parliamentarian Nationalists like John Redmond. To paraphrase they washed out his life's work in a sea of blood in 1916.

    The Republicans don't like statesmen like Redmond, there's a whiff of West Brit off him, his family did once own Loftus Hall afterall.

    Remind us: How many irish men did redmond send of for slaughter?

    Remind us: how long had home rule been delayed by?

    Remind us: what happened to redmond and his party when the right to vote in ireland was extended out past middle aged men?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,910 ✭✭✭✭padd b1975


    @ Sammy Wilson.

    Try not to show up at the funeral bollock naked.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,687 ✭✭✭Karl Stein


    The whole country was split with people arguing, I always thought the best thing that could have happened here is that the 16 Rising never occurred and the Home Rule Act 14 came in and we got on with it.

    Home Rule would have made things worse. There would still have been a sizeable portion of the population seeking independence who would have considered Home Rule little but an opiate to keep the Irish quiet.

    Also with the emergence of the welfare state in England, coupled with Ireland's stunted development, transfers from England would have been needed. In the long term a move toward independence would have been too costly for those benefiting i.e. those with the power and comfortable lifestyles under British paternalism. That would likely have led to a civil war anyway. Think NI in the 70's 80's.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,177 ✭✭✭✭Gael23


    I still have not understood the relevance to gay men donating blood and this thread?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,129 ✭✭✭R P McMurphy


    padd b1975 wrote: »
    @ Sammy Wilson.

    Try not to show up at the funeral bollock naked.

    I wouldn't be an ardent supporter of censorship but in the case of photos of Sammy Wilson frolicking naked i would have to make an exception


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    ryanf1 wrote: »
    I still have not understood the relevance to gay men donating blood and this thread?


    You'll see how it ties into 1916, Paisley, free porn and John Redmond shortly.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 433 ✭✭Miall108


    opiniated wrote: »
    Personally speaking, I'd hope we can learn from it - and say, never again(No pun intended!:D)




    I actually spent quite a bit of time trying to think of something charitable to say about Big Ian, without ignoring the damage that his hate-filled rhetoric inflicted on so many people.

    I wouldn't go so far as to express delight at his death, and would offer sincere condolences to his family, who loved him, but to describe him as a "Man of God" - in particular, the Christian God who preaches Love, Tolerance, and Forgiveness, is the single biggest load of hypocrtical, revisionist, downright lying rubbish I've read on this thread so far - and that's saying something!

    Did you know Dr Paisley personally in order for you to have any credibility to be attacking my posts? No I highly doubt it. Never judge a book by its cover.

    Your username is opinionated, Im expressing my opinion yet your attacking it.

    May he rest in peace, a true knight of the Church and a gentleman. A proud Rangers supporter too I believe


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,412 ✭✭✭Shakespeare's Sister


    Miall108 wrote: »
    Did you know Dr Paisley personally in order for you to have any credibility to be attacking my posts? No I highly doubt it. Never judge a book by its cover.

    Your username is opinionated, Im expressing my opinion yet your attacking it.

    May he rest in peace, a true knight of the Church and a gentleman. A proud Rangers supporter too I believe
    Look up what he did to the nationalist community and get back to us. That is if your self loathing, forelock-tugging self allows you to.
    Why would someone be "proud" of supporting the team of a city they're not from, too? Oh yeh because Rangers has historically been a sectarian club.

    But you're edgy - so, so edgy!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 433 ✭✭Miall108


    Look up what he did to the nationalist community and get back to us. That is if your self loathing, forelock-tugging self allows you to.

    The past is the past theres no use dwelling on it now, its not as if we can go back in time and change it. We all make mistakes. A storm in a teacup


    .......now leave Northern Irelands favourite son rest in peace and dont let me see you round here again


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 433 ✭✭Miall108


    Also Is it necessary for the personal attack?? I thought theres a saying attack the post not the poster. Now feck off you idiot


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 433 ✭✭Miall108


    Look up what he did to the nationalist community and get back to us. That is if your self loathing, forelock-tugging self allows you to.
    Why would someone be "proud" of supporting the team of a city they're not from, too? Oh yeh because Rangers has historically been a sectarian club.

    But you're edgy - so, so edgy!

    Whats wrong with Rangers? A club steeped in tradition


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,177 ✭✭✭✭Gael23


    Miall108 wrote: »
    The past is the past theres no use dwelling on it now, its not as if we can go back in time and change it. We all make mistakes. A storm in a teacup


    .......now leave Northern Irelands favourite son rest in peace and dont let me see you round here again
    I agree with mist of this but he won't rest in peace. Rest on a bed of nails more like


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,768 ✭✭✭✭tomwaterford


    Miall108 wrote: »
    Whats wrong with Rangers? A club steeped in tradition

    for a long long time had a WASP recruitment policy

    White
    Anglo
    Saxon
    Prodestant

    AFAIK it was on there jerseys

    though its all for nothing as rangers are no more....broke up due to being bankrupt:pac:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 433 ✭✭Miall108


    ryanf1 wrote: »
    I agree with mist of this but he won't rest in peace. Rest on a bed of nails more like

    Thats a very rude comment to make something I refuse to engage in making a mockery of a dead man....But at least your not engaging in personal attacks like that Shakespeares Sister(Crap name by the way) whose only way of countering my argument is to insult me personally cos thats very mature. Maybe should go back and read romantic plays instead of insulting people when they cant put forth a factual argument


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 433 ✭✭Miall108


    for a long long time had a WASP recruitment policy

    White
    Anglo
    Saxon
    Prodestant

    AFAIK it was on there jerseys

    though its all for nothing as rangers are no more....broke up due to being bankrupt:pac:

    Again all in the past as most of the stuff being put forward. If ye are all going to live in the past then a fairly miserable old age awaits. Sure dont Rangers have Jon Daly playing up front for them now, an Irishman from Dublin


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,210 ✭✭✭pablo128


    jimmymal wrote: »
    And i would say unto you, you need to get acquainted with the style of trent! Legend


    Any relación pablo, to padraig?
    Or are you, like the rest of us, inspired by trents magnificence?
    It was something I'd read before, and gave it a few tweaks to suit the occasion. I'm a non drinker, but had a few bottles there last night playing darts with the lads just as a little celebration. Rossi won the MotoGP race this morning, and Man Utd won comfortably earlier too. It was a pretty good weekend all in all.:D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,687 ✭✭✭Karl Stein


    Miall108 wrote: »
    The past is the past theres no use dwelling on it now, its not as if we can go back in time and change it.

    Considering the maniacal Paisley tried to justify his evil by citing passages from a book made up by people thousands of years ago this is quite the stupid thing to say.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,177 ✭✭✭✭Gael23


    Miall108 wrote: »
    Thats a very rude comment to make something I refuse to engage in making a mockery of a dead man....But at least your not engaging in personal attacks like that Shakespeares Sister(Crap name by the way) whose only way of countering my argument is to insult me personally cos thats very mature. Maybe should go back and read romantic plays instead of insulting people when they cant put forth a factual argument

    He did nothing in life to warrant respect in death. I'll remember him as someone that spend 50 years preaching hatred against those who practiced the catholic faith, and especially irish catholics.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 433 ✭✭Miall108


    Karl Stein wrote: »
    Considering the maniacal Paisley tried to justify his evil by citing passages from a book made up by people thousands of years ago this is quite the stupid thing to say.

    I stand by my original statement. Paisley played a big part in the Peace Process and mellowed as the years went on. There was a good man in there somewhere but no Irish people still chose to weed out faults even when their not there.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,412 ✭✭✭Shakespeare's Sister


    Miall108 wrote: »
    Thats a very rude comment to make something I refuse to engage in making a mockery of a dead man....But at least your not engaging in personal attacks like that Shakespeares Sister(Crap name by the way) whose only way of countering my argument is to insult me personally cos thats very mature. Maybe should go back and read romantic plays instead of insulting people when they cant put forth a factual argument
    You're the one who called me an idiot love.

    I don't think you can possibly be for real - no fecking way. But if there is the tiniest hint that you're genuine, then yeh, you're talking shyte by: pretending he only made a mistake and it's a storm in a teacup, by playing down Rangers' sectarianism, by stating his policy of ostracising and attacking nationalists needs to be left in the past - tell that to the people who suffered because of it and tell me that you honestly think the same about republican atrocities (that they should be left in the past).
    I think though that, if you're not a loyalist, you're either a self flagellating Irish person so desperate for loyalist approval (as if they'd give it to you) or you're just trying to wind people up. Yep, the last one methinks.
    You can express your disingenuous opinion and others can express their opinion that praise of Ian Paisley and glossing over what he did, is disgusting.


Advertisement
Advertisement