Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Waiting until Marriage.

1101113151619

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,772 ✭✭✭✭The Corinthian


    Okay well I don't know for definite yet. However what is the difference in oral, mutual masturbation and intercourse really. It all has the same outcome.
    Please explain. Apparently not orgasm, as masturbation alone is apparently forgivable, so what is this common outcome?
    I also hope God will forgive me because if I felt I didn't have to do it then I wouldn't.
    Isn't all temptation that you feel you have to do it, touch it, feel it, taste it?

    So some forms of temptation you're willing to give into and others not? I'm afraid that it cherry picking.
    I feel that I need to masturbate as i'm sure many people do due to urges but sex with a woman is not needed but wanted.
    I'm afraid that's not true. Nobody needs to masturbate any more or less than they need to seek intimate relations - it's just another human urge that may be suppressed, if that is your moral code.
    One thing I find interesting though is i know a lot of lads that have been with their first girlfriend for years and they are happy. Which means that sexual compatibility isn't much of a problem or are they just all lucky?
    Entirely possible that they are lucky. Depends on what you mean by 'years'. A lifelong commitment is quite a bit longer than you've been around and couples are not always happy in the long term. Sometimes they change. Sometimes they were never really happy, but went with the flow. You'd be surprised how seemingly picture perfect couples are not so picture perfect beneath the surface.

    Either way, I suspect you're probably a tad young to be throwing around life experience just yet.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 264 ✭✭Silverman11


    Well no, you asked for people's opinions on your situation.
    I asked for people's opinions about girls.


    Yes but they are still together BECAUSE they are compatible. Whereas if they weren't compatible, they wouldn't have to end a marriage (or stay stuck in an unhappy one), they would just have to end a relationship. I don't know how common or uncommon sexual incompatibility is, but as a 29-year-old woman I know from personal experience, and experiences of my friends, that it is more common than you seem to believe.
    They are compatible with their first girlfriend. Is it all a coincidence?
    An File wrote: »
    That is not what I meant at all. That is not it at all...

    Dude, I haven't turned 26 yet. I don't have kids or any real responsibilities. It's fantastic.

    I merely presented a flaw in your anecdotal "evidence". My opinion is that young couples who've been together since their teens live in a very different world to older couples with all kinds of other pressures besides what sexy thing they're going to try next.
    But I mean that if they are compatibly when they are younger then surely they will be compatible when they are older.
    _Redzer_ wrote: »
    In seriousness tho, I don't see the difference between your cum in a tissue or in some girl.

    Sure isn't it all "wasted seed" and "sinful" when it's not for procreation only, so you're commiting just a big a sin by masturbating. No ifs or buts about it, your bible says so.
    I simply mentioned my beliefs was one reason I was waiting because I was asked. You don't know my personal situation. Why do you keep going on about my Religious beliefs when that is not what I asked?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,197 ✭✭✭housetypeb


    That is one thing I think is alright because we need a release. I also hope God will FORGIVE me because if I felt I didn't have to do it then I wouldn't.

    You seem to already have a hang-up about sex.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 264 ✭✭Silverman11


    Please explain. Apparently not orgasm, as masturbation alone is apparently forgivable, so what is this common outcome?

    Isn't all temptation that you feel you have to do it, touch it, feel it, taste it?

    So some forms of temptation you're willing to give into and others not? I'm afraid that it cherry picking.

    I'm afraid that's not true. Nobody needs to masturbate any more or less than they need to seek intimate relations - it's just another human urge that may be suppressed, if that is your moral code.

    Entirely possible that they are lucky. Depends on what you mean by 'years'. A lifelong commitment is quite a bit longer than you've been around and couples are not always happy in the long term. Sometimes they change. Sometimes they were never really happy, but went with the flow. You'd be surprised how seemingly picture perfect couples are not so picture perfect beneath the surface.

    Either way, I suspect you're probably a tad young to be throwing around life experience just yet.

    I simply asked a question about whether many people thought of women that would wait for a man until marriage and I am now being questioned on my Faith. You don't know my situation. I was not looking for justification to have sex before marriage. Why do people keep changing the topic?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,296 ✭✭✭alroley


    I'm a 22 year old female and I probably wouldn't wait for a guy who only wanted to have sex after marriage. But if I did really really like him then I'm not sure - I wouldn't want to force him out of his beliefs but I wouldn't be happy waiting either so I still don't think it would work :/


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,056 ✭✭✭_Redzer_


    I simply mentioned my beliefs was one reason I was waiting because I was asked. You don't know my personal situation. Why do you keep going on about my Religious beliefs when that is not what I asked?
    Because you're basing all of this on your religious beliefs and you're not even following them properly. It's completely relevant.

    If you want to be a good catholic, stop beating one out. You don't get to decide the rules of Christianity, they are there and you follow them -the Pope wouldn't care much for your "personal situation", you're breaking the rules.
    That is if you want to be a proper and competent Christian/Catholic or whatever else.


  • Moderators, Social & Fun Moderators, Society & Culture Moderators Posts: 31,218 Mod ✭✭✭✭Insect Overlord


    But I mean that if they are compatibly when they are younger then surely they will be compatible when they are older.

    Ah, come on. Nobody is that naïve. There are far too many miserable couples out there who can hardly remember the days when they were still madly in love. Passions very often fade.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,456 ✭✭✭✭ibarelycare


    They are compatible with their first girlfriend. Is it all a coincidence?

    Who's "they"? The vast vast vast majority of people don't marry their first girlfriend. Think about that.
    I simply mentioned my beliefs was one reason I was waiting because I was asked. You don't know my personal situation. Why do you keep going on about my Religious beliefs when that is not what I asked?

    You keep getting really defensive about your beliefs and using that to tip-toe around the questions being asked, it's quite frustrating to read. How is it ok to commit one "sin" and not another? It's hard not to focus on your religious beliefs since you said that and "you're a romantic" are the reasons that you want to wait until marriage.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 264 ✭✭Silverman11


    alroley wrote: »
    I'm a 22 year old female and I probably wouldn't wait for a guy who only wanted to have sex after marriage. But if I did really really like him then I'm not sure - I wouldn't want to force him out of his beliefs but I wouldn't be happy waiting either so I still don't think it would work :/
    Thank you. This is the kind of answer I was looking for.
    _Redzer_ wrote: »
    Because you're basing all of this on your beliefs and you're not even following them properly. It's completely relevant.

    If you want to be a good catholic, stop beating one out. You don't get to decide the rules of Christianity, they are there and you follow them -the Pope wouldn't care much for your "personal situation", you're breaking the rules.
    That is if you want to be a proper and competent Christian/Catholic or whatever else.
    So you are calling me a bad Catholic and you don't even know me. I would appreciate it if ya don't quote me anymore. I'm sure God cares about my personal situation.
    An File wrote: »
    Ah, come on. Nobody is that naïve. There are far too many miserable couples out there who can hardly remember the days when they were still madly in love. Passions very often fade.
    Fair enough. I see your point.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,056 ✭✭✭_Redzer_


    I'm sure must people have an experience with someone they really like, you click and get on great, but then when you get down to it, or when time drags on a bit you actually don't just click.

    It's a crap and awkward situation because although you might get on, you don't have that spark and energy between ye when you have sex, and once you realise that it taints the whole relationship.

    Problem is, nearly always you only discover it when you start getting intimate and having sex.

    Who's to say that absolutely won't happen to you, OP. You've no way of knowing it at all until you get down to it. Even if you 'think' you do, you actually have no idea and are just taking a chance.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,456 ✭✭✭✭ibarelycare


    I suspect that you're using the "religion and romance" reasons to hide behind because, as someone else just said, you have huge hang-ups about sex. I reckon if your self-esteem improved and you had better luck with girls your feelings about sex would change.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,056 ✭✭✭_Redzer_


    Thank you. This is the kind of answer I was looking for.

    So you are calling me a bad Catholic and you don't even know me. I would appreciate it if ya don't quote me anymore. I'm sure God cares about my personal situation.


    Fair enough. I see your point.

    Yes. You're making your own rules and choosing what you want to do instead of commiting yourself properly to your religion.

    I'm a barman, if I only want to serve what's handiest to me and least amount of fuss, like cutting out cocktails, I'm a bad barman.
    Doesn't quite fit in as an analogy, but I'm sure you get the picture.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,453 ✭✭✭Shenshen


    I can't say I would know any girls who would marry someone they haven't been to bed with - they would feel it would be almost an irresponsible thing to do.
    I know I wouldn't have waited, and all in all it was a good thing I didn't.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭catallus


    _Redzer_ wrote: »
    Yes. You're making your own rules and choosing what you want to do instead of commiting yourself properly to your religion.

    There's a whole lot of judgment right there in that one sentence. Such intolerance!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,100 ✭✭✭Autonomous Cowherd


    Jaysis Lads will ye stop beating a dead horse. He was only wondering if there were possibly some girls left out there who would be into waiting for sex after marriage. I reckon there probably are.

    I reckon it's not that big of a flipping deal in the end what others want to do. If sexual freedom means that people look down their snouts at people not actually having sex then it does not qualify as very free, now does it. Some people are asexual. Some are happy with long periods of drought and then periods of riding. Some like a platonic relationship...it's what makes them happy. Some want to shag all round them. What are you gonna do? Put them all up against a wall because they are not the same as you?

    Do what ever the heck you want Silverman. Don't make too many hard and fast rules for yourself. Go with the flow (man :) ). Life has its own way of ironing out the creases.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 264 ✭✭Silverman11


    I suspect that you're using the "religion and romance" reasons to hide behind because, as someone else just said, you have huge hang-ups about sex. I reckon if your self-esteem improved and you had better luck with girls your feelings about sex would change.

    Honestly if I wanted to find a girl to have sex then I would be able to as bad as that sounds. I know some Priests say that masturbation is not all that bad because I have asked them. I didn't ask about sex before marriage but I'm sure they would have a similar answer as long as it is with someone you love.
    That is why I got upset when someone called me a bad Catholic.

    I suffer from Religious OCD (honestly) which makes it difficult to make decisions. I worry that if I have sex before marriage I will regret it especially on my wedding night.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,453 ✭✭✭Shenshen


    catallus wrote: »
    There's a whole lot of judgment right there in that one sentence. Such intolerance!

    He's got a point in a way though.
    It's fine if you want to take a pick-and-choose approach to your religion and follow some rules but not others. However, when being asked you should really have a better reply than "I don't do that because my religion says so" when there's lots of other things your religion would tell you not to do but which you ignore.

    In short, if you pick and choose you'll need to take the trouble and think through what you pick and choose and why, otherwise people might feel you're taking the mick a little.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 2,562 ✭✭✭eyescreamcone


    Why is sex sinful?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭catallus


    Why is sex sinful?

    Christ, it isn't! :mad:
    Shenshen wrote: »
    He's got a point in a way though.
    It's fine if you want to take a pick-and-choose approach to your religion and follow some rules but not others. However, when being asked you should really have a better reply than "I don't do that because my religion says so" when there's lots of other things your religion would tell you not to do but which you ignore.

    In short, if you pick and choose you'll need to take the trouble and think through what you pick and choose and why, otherwise people might feel you're taking the mick a little.

    The OP is rising to the challenge of his faith in the best way he can.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,056 ✭✭✭_Redzer_


    catallus wrote: »
    There's a whole lot of judgment right there in that one sentence. Such intolerance!

    I am sick to death of Catholics doing what they like and choosing to adhere to the rules they choose.

    I met the most ignorant, homophobic asshole when I was working once who was looking for the ride and had two kids with two different women.

    All that shít doesn't bother me, but the thing that grinded me was how he was a devout catholic and "us gays" doesn't deserve the same things.

    That's why I have such a flag to burn with these so called "Christians". They're not even following their own stupid rules properly.

    So if he is breaking the rules, which he plainly is, that's a fact. No intolerance when it's right there in black and white to call out.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 264 ✭✭Silverman11


    _Redzer_ wrote: »
    Yes. You're making your own rules and choosing what you want to do instead of commiting yourself properly to your religion.

    I'm a barman, if I only want to serve what's handiest to me and least amount of fuss, like cutting out cocktails, I'm a bad barman.
    Doesn't quite fit in as an analogy, but I'm sure you get the picture.
    Just stop it now please. You are the one who keeps going on about Religion. It sounds like you have some bitter problem with Religion.
    catallus wrote: »
    There's a whole lot of judgment right there in that one sentence. Such intolerance!
    Jaysis Lads will ye stop beating a dead horse. He was only wondering if there were possibly some girls left out there who would be into waiting for sex after marriage. I reckon there probably are.

    I reckon it's not that big of a flipping deal in the end what others want to do. If sexual freedom means that people look down their snouts at people not actually having sex then it does not qualify as very free, now does it. Some people are asexual. Some are happy with long periods of drought and then periods of riding. Some like a platonic relationship...it's what makes them happy. Some want to shag all round them. What are you gonna do? Put them all up against a wall because they are not the same as you?

    Do what ever the heck you want Silverman. Don't make too many hard and fast rules for yourself. Go with the flow (man :) ). Life has its own way of ironing out the creases.

    Thank you so much. I don't get all the hate from some posters.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭catallus


    _Redzer_ wrote: »
    I am sick to death of Catholics doing what they like and choosing to adhere to the rules they choose.

    I met the most ignorant, homophobic asshole when I was working once who was looking for the ride and had two kids with two different women.

    All that shít doesn't bother me, but the thing that grinded me was how he was a devout catholic and "us gays" doesn't deserve the same things.

    That's why I have such a flag to burn with these so called "Christians". They're not even following their own stupid rules properly.

    So if he is breaking the rules, which he plainly is, that's a fact. No intolerance when it's right there in black and white to call out.

    Ah, I see.


    You're a Nazi!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,456 ✭✭✭✭ibarelycare


    Honestly if I wanted to find a girl to have sex then I would be able to as bad as that sounds. I know some Priests say that masturbation is not all that bad because I have asked them. I didn't ask about sex before marriage but I'm sure they would have a similar answer as long as it is with someone you love.
    That is why I got upset when someone called me a bad Catholic.

    I suffer from Religious OCD (honestly) which makes it difficult to make decisions. I worry that if I have sex before marriage I will regret it especially on my wedding night.

    I've never heard of Religious OCD, I didn't even know it was a thing. Are you seeking therapy for it?

    You could regret having sex before you get married, or you could regret NOT having sex before you get married if you don't. Who knows what's going to happen in the future, we make decisions every day without knowing what the repercussions will be.

    Did you read this article I posted earlier? http://www.xojane.com/sex/true-love-waits-pledge


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 264 ✭✭Silverman11


    _Redzer_ wrote: »
    I am sick to death of Catholics doing what they like and choosing to adhere to the rules they choose.

    I met the most ignorant, homophobic asshole when I was working once who was looking for the ride and had two kids with two different women.

    All that shít doesn't bother me, but the thing that grinded me was how he was a devout catholic and "us gays" doesn't deserve the same things.

    That's why I have such a flag to burn with these so called "Christians". They're not even following their own stupid rules properly.

    So if he is breaking the rules, which he plainly is, that's a fact. No intolerance when it's right there in black and white to call out.

    As I have said I know Priests who say masturbation and sex before marriage (as long as it is with someone you love) is alright. I was not going on and on about my Religion but you were bringing it back into it.
    So you are gay?
    I have no problem with gay people. I say love all and treat them equally.

    I am sorry you had a bad experience with some people in my Faith but please don't paint us all with the one brush.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,456 ✭✭✭✭ibarelycare


    Why are priests allowed to say what's ok and what's not ok when it comes to the rules of Catholicism? That doesn't make any sense.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,056 ✭✭✭_Redzer_


    catallus wrote: »
    Ah, I see.


    You're a Nazi!

    Nope.

    Just follow your own religion properly before preach shíte to other people. If you can pick and choose what suits you, you've very little right to wave a finger at someone else.

    I'd have a lot more respect for the OP had he stuck to the rules of his religion because there's no logic to letting yourself masturbate, and that being seemingly ok, but drawing the line at sex for no apparent reason.

    If he did have religious OCD he wouldn't be **** at all.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 264 ✭✭Silverman11


    I've never heard of Religious OCD, I didn't even know it was a thing. Are you seeking therapy for it?

    You could regret having sex before you get married, or you could regret NOT having sex before you get married if you don't. Who knows what's going to happen in the future, we make decisions every day without knowing what the repercussions will be.

    Did you read this article I posted earlier? http://www.xojane.com/sex/true-love-waits-pledge

    Yeah I have a therapist for it. Google it. That's why these topics are so hard for me.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,056 ✭✭✭_Redzer_


    As I have said I know Priests who say masturbation and sex before marriage (as long as it is with someone you love) is alright. I was not going on and on about my Religion but you were bringing it back into it.
    So you are gay?
    I have no problem with gay people. I say love all and treat them equally.

    I am sorry you had a bad experience with some people in my Faith but please don't paint us all with the one brush.

    No I don't. I don't hate religious people, I hate your religion though.

    I'm not saying you are as bad as that guy was at all, but you both have this pick and choose attitude in common -which I despise because that's always the case with the vocal assholes I come in contact with -again, not a dig at you, just a recurrent characteristic in them.

    The "do as I say, not as I do" mentality is extremely irritating to me as a result because there's no consistency there at all.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 58,456 ✭✭✭✭ibarelycare


    Yeah I have a therapist for it. Google it. That's why these topics are so hard for me.

    Yeah I looked it up. Extreme Catholic guilt basically? I think it's really sad that someone so young suffers from that. I genuinely hope that you learn to deal with it, because you will more than likely live a fuller and happier life if you do.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,106 ✭✭✭catallus


    _Redzer_ wrote: »
    Nope.

    Just follow your own religion properly before preach shíte to other people. If you can pick and choose what suits you, you've very little right to wave a finger at someone else...

    I'd love to see your basis for criticising the way someone wants to live their lives.

    You might think it hypocritical, but that's part of life too.

    You project your resentment and hate onto a person who at least is trying to do right by his own moral/philosophical code and you shít on him cos you have a problem with the big bad church which has so obviously ruined your life (in some non-descript intangible way, of course).


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement