Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
If we do not hit our goal we will be forced to close the site.

Current status: https://keepboardsalive.com/

Annual subs are best for most impact. If you are still undecided on going Ad Free - you can also donate using the Paypal Donate option. All contribution helps. Thank you.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.

Israel - Palestine Conflict. **Mod note in OP - updated 1st August**

11112141617174

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    jank wrote: »
    Two things. You have continuously harped on about the 'real' reason why Israel are carrying out the current assault is that they are afraid of a unified Palestinian political body. Yet, now you claim that they were behind Fatah (who were defeated in 2006 elections) when they tried to wrestle back control from Hamas. If that was successful wouldn't there be a unified Palestinian political body now in Palestine, then why are Israel carrying out the latest assault..

    ?
    jank wrote: »
    Secondly, why are you so reluctant to call out Hamas for what they are, a terrorist group who are labelled as such by pretty much every international organisation in the world.

    So again, are Hamas a terrorist group, yes or no.
    You non-answer next time will indicate that they indeed are but for some reason wont want to admit it.

    "terrorist" is a label forked out on non-state actors by their opponents. It's a meaningless title that's been fired at everyone from the IRA to the ANC in order to demonise the opposition.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,749 ✭✭✭✭wes


    jank wrote: »
    I do, yet there was about 20 posts tutting at the treatment of poor Lucas yet none about the 20 or so killed by Hamas for daring to object to war.

    I am confused, I taught those who were killed for being spies, specifically aiding the IDF in killing Palestinians? If they were murdered for just protesting, then that is war crime, and should be condemned.

    If they were killed for being spies, then that should be condemned due to the lack of a fair trial, but if its due to spying, then the 2 examples are not comparable.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 13,016 ✭✭✭✭jank


    Nodin wrote: »
    ?


    "terrorist" is a label forked out on non-state actors by their opponents. It's a meaningless title that's been fired at everyone from the IRA to the ANC in order to demonise the opposition.

    So you refuse to call Hamas a terrorist organisation. Wow, just wow!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,427 ✭✭✭RustyNut


    Is the 20000 civilians killed in the Afghan war mass murder too?

    That might be a good topic for another thread but we are debating the slaughter of innocent men women and children in Palastine.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,250 ✭✭✭✭bumper234


    jank wrote: »
    So you refuse to call Hamas a terrorist organisation. Wow, just wow!

    Will you admit that Israel are committing war crimes?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    jank wrote: »
    So you refuse to call Hamas a terrorist organisation. Wow, just wow!


    It's a pointless label that's been utterly devalued. They called Mandela a terrorist ffs. I'll call them a loathsome organisation, a nasty bunch and so on, but "terrorist" is meaningless.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 260 ✭✭bboybaboy19


    RustyNut wrote: »
    That might be a good topic for another thread but we are debating the slaughter of innocent men women and children in Palastine.

    I'm just wondering why you'd consider one mass murder and not the other one..it's a simple yes/no answer.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,205 ✭✭✭Gringo180


    jank wrote: »
    I do, yet there was about 20 posts tutting at the treatment of poor Lucas yet none about the 20 or so killed by Hamas for daring to object to war. See that is the fundamental difference between the sides. Israel can be dicks, they may have slapped the poor kid around a bit but apart from a bruise and his ego dented he is free to tell the world about his story. In Gaza, you are taken away behind a building, shot and your body dragged through the streets as a warning to others..... I know which treatment I would have preferred if I had the choice.

    mod image snipped
    Can we jointly condemn this action?

    Do you not understand that the reason Hamas started to fire rockets is because the Israelis start locking up members of Hamas for no reason other than the fact that they wanted to join up with Fatah to make a majority government, then the Israelis went on to blame Hamas for the death of 3 israeli teeneagers even tho they have no evidence to back up this claim, and wait for it, they were murdered in the West Bank were there are no members of Hamas. Can you even agree that it was Israel that broke this ceasefire which started this conflict?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,533 ✭✭✭Donkey Oaty


    Tuisceanch wrote: »
    I wonder what Phil is up to in Eastenders.

    He has converted to Islam and - against the advice of the local friendly cockney Muslims - has gone to Nigeria to fight with Boko Haram

    or

    He has become an Orthodox Jew and refuses to shake hands with women that he cannot be sure are not on their menstrual cycle, creating unexpected problems for the scriptwriters and VT editors.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,252 ✭✭✭FTA69


    jank wrote: »
    So you refuse to call Hamas a terrorist organisation. Wow, just wow!

    By the same criteria Israel are also terrorists; hence the pointlessness of the label. Nodin is correct, it's a pejorative term used to automatically discredit any non-state opposition to the status quo.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 13,016 ✭✭✭✭jank


    wes wrote: »
    I am confused, I taught those who were killed for being spies, specifically aiding the IDF in killing Palestinians? If they were murdered for just protesting, then that is war crime, and should be condemned.

    If they were killed for being spies, then that should be condemned due to the lack of a fair trial, but if its due to spying, then the 2 examples are not comparable.

    Yes, every anti-war protestor in Gaza is a 'spy'. Kangaroo courts and extra judicial justice is the norm in Gaza. I guess we will never find out the real story cause all the accused are already dead. Sure didn't they confess before a bullet blew their heads off.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,427 ✭✭✭RustyNut


    I'm just wondering why you'd consider one mass murder and not the other one..it's a simple yes/no answer.

    Where did I say that?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,749 ✭✭✭✭wes


    jank wrote: »
    So you refuse to call Hamas a terrorist organisation. Wow, just wow!

    Terrorists are non-state actors, Hamas's are the defacto authority in Gaza (they even won an election, and are also a part of will be part of a unity Palestinian government), and as such they are not terrorists.

    Having said that, there is certainly a great deal of evidence that Hamas are committing war crimes during the present conflict, but the same can be said of the IDF to a far greater extent.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 260 ✭✭bboybaboy19


    RustyNut wrote: »
    Where did I say that?

    I didn't say you did but your refusal to answer it speaks volumes.

    So, do you consider the killing of the innocent afghans to be mass murder, yes or no?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭notfromhere


    Excellent precision shooting by the IDF in that video.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,749 ✭✭✭✭wes


    jank wrote: »
    Yes, every anti-war protestor in Gaza is a 'spy'.

    Well, the way that the story is written it was very unclear what they were saying to me.
    jank wrote: »
    Kangaroo courts and extra judicial justice is the norm in Gaza. I guess we will never find out the real story cause all the accused are already dead. Sure didn't they confess before a bullet blew their heads off.

    If what is being claimed is true, then as I said earlier its a crime, as no proper trials were conducted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 735 ✭✭✭Tuisceanch


    He has converted to Islam and - against the advice of the local friendly cockney Muslims - has gone to Nigeria to fight with Boko Haram

    or

    He has become an Orthodox Jew and refuses to shake hands with women that he cannot be sure are not on their menstrual cycle, creating unexpected problems for the scriptwriters and VT editors.

    Wild unfounded speculation with the sole purpose of ruining my enjoyment of the wonders of TV reality.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,205 ✭✭✭Gringo180


    Nodin wrote: »
    It's a pointless label that's been utterly devalued. They called Mandela a terrorist ffs. I'll call them a loathsome organisation, a nasty bunch and so on, but "terrorist" is meaningless.
    "And you dare to call me a terrorist as you look down your gun"


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 13,016 ✭✭✭✭jank


    FTA69 wrote: »
    By the same criteria Israel are also terrorists; hence the pointlessness of the label. Nodin is correct, it's a pejorative term used to automatically discredit any non-state opposition to the status quo.

    They perjury themselves with their actions and their charter that denies the holocaust, calls for the killing of Jews and the genocide of Israelis.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 282 ✭✭KahBoom


    The word 'terrorist' means "anyone the US/western-powers labels a terrorist", and little more than that - there is no consistency to the term at all, it is pretty much meaningless.

    If the label had any consistency, then US drone bombings of funerals, and Israeli war crimes against civilians, can equally be labelled terrorist acts.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 11,749 ✭✭✭✭wes


    jank wrote: »
    They perjury themselves with their actions and their charter that denies the holocaust, calls for the killing of Jews and the genocide of Israelis.

    And the settler colonial project is actively doing exactly that to Palestinians as we speak. I fail to see how the Israeli government is any better.

    BTW, the Israeli government were at this sort of carry on before Hamas even existed, and they used the same tired excuses they use now.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 326 ✭✭notfromhere


    Is that a Wolf Tone song u dare to call me a terrorist


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 735 ✭✭✭Tuisceanch


    Are we controlled by alien forces? YES or NO. I demand an answer as I'm sick of your prevarication on this subject.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,427 ✭✭✭RustyNut


    I didn't say you did but your refusal to answer it speaks volumes.

    So, do you consider the killing of the innocent afghans to be mass murder, yes or no?

    If you start another thread instead of trying to derail this one you might get an answer.

    Do you think targeting kids playing on a beech is murder ?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Is that a Wolf Tone song u dare to call me a terrorist


    Yep.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 735 ✭✭✭Tuisceanch



    There's people signing up to that at a phenomenal rate. Thanks for posting. Perhaps they could use his residence as a hostel for the homeless.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,476 ✭✭✭eeepaulo


    KahBoom wrote: »
    The word 'terrorist' means "anyone the US/western-powers labels a terrorist", and little more than that - there is no consistency to the term at all, it is pretty much meaningless.

    If the label had any consistency, then US drone bombings of funerals, and Israeli war crimes against civilians, can equally be labelled terrorist acts.

    I listened to a wonderful piece on bbc radio 4 yesterday about newspeak, orwells idea of controlling us by changing the language and using soundbites, I do think the 'civilized' western world's label terrorist falls into this category


    Merriam webster definition of terrorist

    the use of violent acts to frighten the people in an area as a way of trying to achieve a political goal


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,798 ✭✭✭✭hatrickpatrick


    Gringo180 wrote: »
    I said unless your stupid
    Gringo180 wrote: »
    unless your stupid
    Gringo180 wrote: »
    your stupid

    :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,372 ✭✭✭LorMal


    Nodin wrote: »
    ?


    "terrorist" is a label forked out on non-state actors by their opponents. It's a meaningless title that's been fired at everyone from the IRA to the ANC in order to demonise the opposition.

    Ah come on, Nodin. The IRA and Hamas are not terrorists?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,678 ✭✭✭I Heart Internet


    Nodin wrote: »
    It's a pointless label that's been utterly devalued. They called Mandela a terrorist ffs. I'll call them a loathsome organisation, a nasty bunch and so on, but "terrorist" is meaningless.

    No it's not.

    It may be used incorrectly, but it means a person or group who employs terror as a tactic to get its way.

    Is Hamas a terrorist organisation?


Advertisement