Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Everybody else in the family is at the Commonwealth Games, so why aren't we?

13468915

Comments

  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,462 ✭✭✭blinding


    764dak wrote: »
    Usain Bolt is going to run in the 4x100 relays. I think Shelly-Ann Fraser-Pryce will also compete in the women's equivalent.
    Thats too many names for one person and if that is typical of the carry on at these games then I may have to withdraw my former conditional support for Irish athletes taking part.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 33,779 ✭✭✭✭Princess Consuela Bananahammock


    Karl Stein wrote: »
    So people who would vote against it, people who don't agree with you, are irrational and full of hate?

    That's sounds a lot like hatred of democracy to me.

    Do you hate democracy?

    Not really what he said.

    And no, I'm not a big fan of democracy, ever since FF and Bush managed get re-elected.

    Everything I don't like is either woke or fascist - possibly both - pick one.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,463 ✭✭✭Deedsie


    Whenever the Ireland rejoining the commonwealth debate comes up I am always unsure. I have no doubt it will eventually happen, but I am not sure who would or wouldn't want it. Would we do well rubbing shoulders with the Falklands or Gibralter?

    I know it was "our" empire too but I take no pride or ownership whatsoever in that part of our history... We were a colony to me not an equal kingdom/region in the UK between 1801 & 1921... (I am proud of Tom Creans exploits, am I a hypocrite here?)

    As bad as we are on our own, ruled by our own crooks, our time under British rule was not a good thing so I think rejoining the commonwealth for any reason other than furthering the peace process with our pro union brothers in Northern Ireland is unnecessary and unwanted by the majority of people who waste their time thinking about silly things like this.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,126 ✭✭✭Reekwind


    SERCPRO wrote: »
    I have the right just like ever other poster to give an opinion without being insulted by others!
    I'm not sure anyone here has that right. The responses responses you get are primarily based on their merit. For example, suggesting that Ireland take part in the Commonwealth Games despite the small matter of it not being in the Commonwealth is pretty silly. We might as well apply to participate in the Asian or Maccabiah Games.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 795 ✭✭✭kingchess


    Hi estranged bitter little cousin.

    hi estranged abusive ex-significant other.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,823 ✭✭✭WakeUp


    Deedsie wrote: »
    I know it was "our" empire too but I take no pride or ownership whatsoever in that part of our history... We were a colony to me not an equal kingdom/region in the UK between 1801 & 1921... (I am proud of Tom Creans exploits, am I a hypocrite here?)

    We have good relations with our neighbours in Britain today , as it should be, and long may it continue. though going back in time to say it was "our" empire too in any way shape or form I don't think it was it wasn't certainly not in the sense of the word "ours" which you point out yourself by stating we were a colony which we were. empires absorb things the mechanisms and power always originate from one place - it can't belong to everyone or be "ours" too, that's a contradiction.

    "Auferre, trucidare, rapere, falsis nominibus imperium; atque, ubi solitudinem faciunt, pacem appellant."

    To ravage, to slaughter, to usurp under false titles, they call empire; and where they make a desert, they call it peace.

    - Tacitus


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,616 ✭✭✭muddypaws


    We have the Ryder Cup, a competition that the great majority of the countries currently competing in Glasgow cannot be part of. I'd much rather have those 3 days of golf than 11 days of the Commonwealth games.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,244 ✭✭✭✭bnt


    Karl Stein wrote: »
    So people who would vote against it, people who don't agree with you, are irrational and full of hate?

    That's sounds a lot like hatred of democracy to me.

    Do you hate democracy?
    I call Ireland's anti-Englishness irrational because it's not adequately explained by the history, and it persists long after the reasons for it have gone away. There are Commonwealth countries with far more reason to be anti-British than Ireland, such as South Africa (the Boer Wars), or India & Pakistan (events leading up to the Partition of 1948). Scotland was permanently changed by the Act of Union and Highland Clearances, yet in the long run having Scotland in the Union was good for both countries.

    Here, though, there's a kneejerk anti-British sentiment that gets passed down from generation to generation, poisoning every attempt to improve relations. Ireland could have been one country of 32 counties, long ago, were it not for Ian Paisley saying "No" to everything and the IRA blowing people up instead of negotiating. The political differences between the peoples of these islands are trivial in comparison to the position a hundred years ago, and religion should be no excuse any more, what with religious freedom everywhere.

    I don't "hate democracy", but democracy only tells you what the people want, not what is right or makes sense. Individual people can be smart and wise, but "the people" are dumb and easily led. No country in the world is a true democracy, and there are good reasons for that: if the people decide everything "live", you get mob rule.

    Switzerland is much closer to a true democracy, but at a local Canton level, not across the whole Federation we call "Switzerland". Here, you only get a referendum on issues relating to the Constitution, not the day-to-day running of the country. "Democracy" is not, by itself, a basis for government. So, before you accuse someone of "hating democracy", you might want to gain a better understanding of what "democracy" is, and is not. ;)

    Perhaps Ireland (the 32 counties) could use a little political Rohypnol. It's been said that those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it, but some degree of forgetfulness is necessary if you're ever going to forge and maintain relationships. Would you want your boy/girlfriend to remember every time you farted in bed? :o

    Government resting upon the will and universal suffrage of the people has no anchorage except in the people's intelligence.

    — Grover Cleveland



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,463 ✭✭✭Deedsie


    bnt wrote: »
    I call Ireland's anti-Englishness irrational because it's not adequately explained by the history, and it persists long after the reasons for it have gone away. There are Commonwealth countries with far more reason to be anti-British than Ireland, such as South Africa (the Boer Wars), or India & Pakistan (events leading up to the Partition of 1948). Scotland was permanently changed by the Act of Union and Highland Clearances, yet in the long run having Scotland in the Union was good for both countries.

    Here, though, there's a kneejerk anti-British sentiment that gets passed down from generation to generation, poisoning every attempt to improve relations. Ireland could have been one country of 32 counties, long ago, were it not for Ian Paisley saying "No" to everything and the IRA blowing people up instead of negotiating. The political differences between the peoples of these islands are trivial in comparison to the position a hundred years ago, and religion should be no excuse any more, what with religious freedom everywhere.

    I don't "hate democracy", but democracy only tells you what the people want, not what is right or makes sense. Individual people can be smart and wise, but "the people" are dumb and easily led. No country in the world is a true democracy, and there are good reasons for that: if the people decide everything "live", you get mob rule.

    Switzerland is much closer to a true democracy, but at a local Canton level, not across the whole Federation we call "Switzerland". Here, you only get a referendum on issues relating to the Constitution, not the day-to-day running of the country. "Democracy" is not, by itself, a basis for government. So, before you accuse someone of "hating democracy", you might want to gain a better understanding of what "democracy" is, and is not. ;)

    Perhaps Ireland (the 32 counties) could use a little political Rohypnol. It's been said that those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it, but some degree of forgetfulness is necessary if you're ever going to forge and maintain relationships. Would you want your boy/girlfriend to remember every time you farted in bed? :o

    I didn't read it all but the ascendancy, The Famine and Bloody Sunday in Derry are pretty good reasons for Irish people to have held anti British sentiments... I always think the term anti English lets the Scots, Welsh and some of our fellow Irish off the hook.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 150 ✭✭SERCPRO


    Reekwind wrote: »
    I'm not sure anyone here has that right. The responses responses you get are primarily based on their merit. For example, suggesting that Ireland take part in the Commonwealth Games despite the small matter of it not being in the Commonwealth is pretty silly. We might as well apply to participate in the Asian or Maccabiah Games.

    I was speaking hypothetically in response to the original post and giving an opinion and I elaborated on my opinion in a post further on in the thread !
    END OF STORY ! Good luck to you!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,823 ✭✭✭WakeUp


    bnt wrote: »
    I call Ireland's anti-Englishness irrational because it's not adequately explained by the history, and it persists long after the reasons for it have gone away. There are Commonwealth countries with far more reason to be anti-British than Ireland, such as South Africa (the Boer Wars), or India & Pakistan (events leading up to the Partition of 1948). Scotland was permanently changed by the Act of Union and Highland Clearances, yet in the long run having Scotland in the Union was good for both countries.

    Here, though, there's a kneejerk anti-British sentiment that gets passed down from generation to generation, poisoning every attempt to improve relations. Ireland could have been one country of 32 counties, long ago, were it not for Ian Paisley saying "No" to everything and the IRA blowing people up instead of negotiating. The political differences between the peoples of these islands are trivial in comparison to the position a hundred years ago, and religion should be no excuse any more, what with religious freedom everywhere.

    I don't "hate democracy", but democracy only tells you what the people want, not what is right or makes sense. Individual people can be smart and wise, but "the people" are dumb and easily led. No country in the world is a true democracy, and there are good reasons for that: if the people decide everything "live", you get mob rule.

    Switzerland is much closer to a true democracy, but at a local Canton level, not across the whole Federation we call "Switzerland". Here, you only get a referendum on issues relating to the Constitution, not the day-to-day running of the country. "Democracy" is not, by itself, a basis for government. So, before you accuse someone of "hating democracy", you might want to gain a better understanding of what "democracy" is, and is not. ;)

    Perhaps Ireland (the 32 counties) could use a little political Rohypnol. It's been said that those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it, but some degree of forgetfulness is necessary if you're ever going to forge and maintain relationships. Would you want your boy/girlfriend to remember every time you farted in bed? :o

    Ireland's "anti Englishness" or "anti Britishness" really? what a ridiculous irrational thing to say. you need to back that up or retract it do you generalise much. I call your sweeping generalisation boll0x unless of course you can back it up..can you? what a dumb ass statement to make.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 35,514 ✭✭✭✭efb


    764dak wrote: »
    Usain Bolt is going to run in the 4x100 relays. I think Shelly-Ann Fraser-Pryce will also compete in the women's equivalent.

    Not in the individual tho


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,689 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    muddypaws wrote: »
    We have the Ryder Cup, a competition that the great majority of the countries currently competing in Glasgow cannot be part of. I'd much rather have those 3 days of golf than 11 days of the Commonwealth games.

    There are 17 sports in the Commonwealth Games with different variations of each sport. You cannot compare that to a one sport competition!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,126 ✭✭✭Reekwind


    bnt wrote: »
    By choice. These days the Commonwealth of Nations includes countries such as Mozambique, which was colonised by the Portuguese but was never part of the British Empire. Ireland could easily join if it wanted to - heck, de Valera was in favour of the idea just a few years after Ireland became a Republic - but it would never pass a vote. Too much irrational hatred of anything that might appear to link you to your nearest neighbour.
    Again, I love the idea that those people who see a problem with paying to join an irrelevant post-empire organisation just to take part in a quadrennial competition are the "irrational" ones. That's AH Logic 101.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,689 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    efb wrote: »
    Not in the individual tho

    He explains that

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AY_L9sJq7uc


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,616 ✭✭✭muddypaws


    There are 17 sports in the Commonwealth Games with different variations of each sport. You cannot compare that to a one sport competition!

    Of course I can. I haven't watched any of the commonwealth games, and probably won't, but I will be glued to the TV for the whole of the Ryder Cup. Holding the Ryder Cup at the K club wasn't beneficial to Ireland?

    And so we can't compare the rugby world cup to the commonwealth games, if we won it and it was held here? With the influx of visitors from around the world, tv coverage etc. Another one sport competition.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,689 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    muddypaws wrote: »
    Of course I can. I haven't watched any of the commonwealth games, and probably won't, but I will be glued to the TV for the whole of the Ryder Cup. Holding the Ryder Cup at the K club wasn't beneficial to Ireland?

    And so we can't compare the rugby world cup to the commonwealth games, if we won it and it was held here? With the influx of visitors from around the world, tv coverage etc. Another one sport competition.

    I am referring to the sporting occasion. The Golf is not up there at all with the appeal of a multi sport Games such as the Commonwealth Games. I have watched a bit of the Commonwealth Games (mainly the Swimming, Triathlon & Track Cycling) and will probably watch the last hour of the Golf just to see who wins. The Commonwealth Games offers far more appeal to spectators and competitors than the Ryder Cup.

    I am not suggesting Ireland joins the Commonwealth, I am suggesting that the Commonwealth Games as a sporting occasion is far bigger than the Ryder Cup.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,616 ✭✭✭muddypaws


    I am referring to the sporting occasion. The Golf is not up there at all with the appeal of a multi sport Games such as the Commonwealth Games. I have watched a bit of the Commonwealth Games (mainly the Swimming, Triathlon & Track Cycling) and will probably watch the last hour of the Golf just to see who wins. The Commonwealth Games offers far more appeal to spectators and competitors than the Ryder Cup.

    I am not suggesting Ireland joins the Commonwealth, I am suggesting that the Commonwealth Games as a sporting occasion is far bigger than the Ryder Cup.

    Maybe not to you, but it is to me and a lot of other people. The commonwealth games is barely getting a mention from any of my British friends, yet when the ryder cup is on, there is lots of talk about it. In our social/multi-media age, people watch it at home and chat about it on line at the same time, so it becomes a global event, it also happened with the olympics, people talking to each other in real time on different continents as they watched. I honestly haven't seen that at all with the commonwealth games. It may change when the athletics starts. I cancelled my Sky Sports subscription a few years ago, but got it back for September 2012 and will do the same again this year just for this event.

    Maybe you're not a golf fan, and thats fine, you're allowed not to be, but try watching the Ryder cup from the beginning, it is unlike any other golf competition. So many people watch it that wouldn't know one end of a driver the other, but it is the whole event that captures the imagination. Funnily enough its on in Scotland this time, if you want to just watch the last half hour, you'll need to keep up to date with it, as I'm not sure how you would know when the last half hour is, it could all be over on the Saturday :)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,689 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    muddypaws wrote: »

    Maybe you're not a golf fan

    There is the difference in a nutshell - I am not a Golf fan whereas there is something to appeal to lots with 17 sports. I never really watched the Triathlon but that was amazing to watch in the CW Games, same with the swimming. I will catch the last hour of the Golf if I am available, I do read newspapers and online sources so will know when the 'climax' is expected.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,516 ✭✭✭wazky


    People are so desperate to prove "alls swell with the old enemy" that they reckon Ireland should join this old Imperialist relic just to play in their glorified school sports day.


  • Advertisement
  • Posts: 13,839 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    What's not to love about Rugby 7s!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,616 ✭✭✭muddypaws


    What's not to love about Rugby 7s!

    Have you seen this guy? He's not at the commonwealth games though, as he's American ;)



  • Closed Accounts Posts: 35,514 ✭✭✭✭efb


    Im loving the 7s


  • Posts: 13,839 ✭✭✭✭ [Deleted User]


    @muddypaws, he's class and was only playing 12 weeks when that was recorded!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,124 ✭✭✭An Claidheamh


    bnt wrote: »
    By choice. These days the Commonwealth of Nations includes countries such as Mozambique, which was colonised by the Portuguese but was never part of the British Empire. Ireland could easily join if it wanted to - heck, de Valera was in favour of the idea just a few years after Ireland became a Republic - but it would never pass a vote. Too much irrational hatred of anything that might appear to link you to your nearest neighbour.

    You read that before you posted it right? :D

    By the way, apart from Mozambique "these days" what other countries that were not part of the British empire are in the British commonwealth?

    Rockall?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,124 ✭✭✭An Claidheamh


    bnt wrote: »
    I call Ireland's anti-Englishness irrational because it's not adequately explained by the history, and it persists long after the reasons for it have gone away. There are Commonwealth countries with far more reason to be anti-British than Ireland, such as South Africa (the Boer Wars), or India & Pakistan (events leading up to the Partition of 1948). Scotland was permanently changed by the Act of Union and Highland Clearances, yet in the long run having Scotland in the Union was good for both countries.

    Here, though, there's a kneejerk anti-British sentiment that gets passed down from generation to generation, poisoning every attempt to improve relations. Ireland could have been one country of 32 counties, long ago, were it not for Ian Paisley saying "No" to everything and the IRA blowing people up instead of negotiating. The political differences between the peoples of these islands are trivial in comparison to the position a hundred years ago, and religion should be no excuse any more, what with religious freedom everywhere.

    I don't "hate democracy", but democracy only tells you what the people want, not what is right or makes sense. Individual people can be smart and wise, but "the people" are dumb and easily led. No country in the world is a true democracy, and there are good reasons for that: if the people decide everything "live", you get mob rule.

    Switzerland is much closer to a true democracy, but at a local Canton level, not across the whole Federation we call "Switzerland". Here, you only get a referendum on issues relating to the Constitution, not the day-to-day running of the country. "Democracy" is not, by itself, a basis for government. So, before you accuse someone of "hating democracy", you might want to gain a better understanding of what "democracy" is, and is not. ;)

    Perhaps Ireland (the 32 counties) could use a little political Rohypnol. It's been said that those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it, but some degree of forgetfulness is necessary if you're ever going to forge and maintain relationships. Would you want your boy/girlfriend to remember every time you farted in bed? :o



    You have a severe inferiority complex bnt.

    Just because no one sees Britain as a super power in Ireland anymore does not make us anti-English.

    You want to move on?

    Well how about Ireland not being obliged to remain tied to the hip with a country that once invaded it, along with others.

    And, also, how about they stay in the EU if they are so concerned with our "shared history", and lose the jingoism.

    ;)


    Watch some hurling pet. ;)


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,124 ✭✭✭An Claidheamh



    A comment from under the video:


    "I wonder how much he is being paid just for turning up for this crock of ****e?
    and he can't even be arsed to compete in one of the proper events and just opts for the 4x100m relay "fun run" farce....
    "


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 19,689 ✭✭✭✭A Dub in Glasgo


    You also known as cthulhu5555?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,124 ✭✭✭An Claidheamh


    You also known as cthulhu5555?

    Definitely not.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,892 ✭✭✭✭Spook_ie


    efb wrote: »
    Not in the individual tho
    If he withdrew from the Olympics because of injury would you think less of the olympics


Advertisement
Advertisement