Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Croke Park residents to seek concert injuctions.....your opinions?

1216217219221222255

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,269 ✭✭✭✭hynesie08


    ardle1 wrote: »
    Everyone at the moment is expecting 5 not 3!
    so fingers crossed for all concerned, that includes the residents who have now been 'advertising'(most off them anyway)that they would NOT be against all concerts going ahead.... And obviously all 'rules' adhered to there-after

    you mean the 35 or so who showed up to protest.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,307 ✭✭✭Pwindedd


    ardle1 wrote: »
    The infrastructure around Croker is grand, who could have fore-seen that the Worlds biggest Entertainment event involving the Worlds Greatest and best selling Artist! That Ireland Dublin Croke Park would have been chosen for this Historical event..... Grab your Stetson Garth we'll be ready and waiting Yeeeeeeeeee-HAWWWWWWWWWWWW

    Okay just for the fun of it

    1. He's not the worlds greatest and best selling artist - that honour based on record sales goes to the Beatles, he's actually the 15th best (still quite impressive even I'll admit)

    2. Worlds biggest entertainment event....erm Woodstock, Live Aid, Olympics, World Cup to name but a few

    3. Historical? well it is now anyway. The biggest Entertainment event that never was... I hope the 3 nights still happen by the way - I'm not anti Gareth, just not a fan, more of a Patsy Cline girl myself.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,066 ✭✭✭✭Happyman42


    It's about more than G. Brooks now for me.
    Are we once again going to ignore the independent decision of one of our state's bodies -specifically tasked to review and control matters like this without interference or bias- or are we going to revert to nod and wink interference in planning again and falling over ourselves to get to the big money.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,240 ✭✭✭Kaizersoze81


    There'll be 3 in a row, then a break of a day and 2 more concerts. This will be a new licence application as the additional 2 will be on different dates. This gets around the fact that the original licence decision can't be changed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,521 ✭✭✭ardle1


    There's going to be an emergency motion presented to DCC tomorrow(Monday).. You are all aware of that yeah?


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,730 ✭✭✭✭Fred Swanson


    This post has been deleted.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,730 ✭✭✭✭Fred Swanson


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,269 ✭✭✭✭hynesie08


    There'll be 3 in a row, then a break of a day and 2 more concerts. This will be a new licence application as the additional 2 will be on different dates. This gets around the fact that the original licence decision can't be changed.

    And what gets around the fact that a license has to be applied for 10 weeks in advance?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,240 ✭✭✭Kaizersoze81


    It will be a fast tracked application. Only posting what I've been hearing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,269 ✭✭✭✭hynesie08


    It will be a fast tracked application. Only posting what I've been hearing.

    What your hearing is either bollix or illegal.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,730 ✭✭✭✭Fred Swanson


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,240 ✭✭✭Kaizersoze81


    hynesie08 wrote: »
    What your hearing is either bollix or illegal.

    Possibly both, but just thought I'd share it. We should know by Tuesday either way I'd say . I've a feeling that this is too big to stop now, and forces are at play behind the scenes to let it go ahead.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 829 ✭✭✭smellmepower


    Infrastructure around Croke Park is ****e.No direct public transport links to the stadium,no designated car parks for patrons,and some of the streets around the stadium are far too narrow to safely sustain the numbers of people entering and exiting the ground.

    Should never have been allowed to re-develop it until these issues were addressed in the first place.Typical badly thought out Irish design.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 14,200 ✭✭✭✭JRant


    The whiff of desperate hope from some quaters that somehow these 5 gigs will go ahead is truely astonishing.

    "It's not the despair, I can take the despair. It's the hope I can't stand"

    "Well, yeah, you know, that's just, like, your opinion, man"



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,614 ✭✭✭muddypaws


    Possibly both, but just thought I'd share it. We should know by Tuesday either way I'd say . I've a feeling that this is too big to stop now, and forces are at play behind the scenes to let it go ahead.

    Yeah, to hell with the law, we have loads of money, so we'll get what we want.

    I have no issues with Garth Brooks, a lot of my friends have bought tickets, and I feel sorry for them and other fans. But a legal decision has been made, without fear or favour, and if we really do care about our international reputation (although I honestly believe nobody outside of Ireland gives a damn about this issue) then it has to stand. Please let the brown envelope days be behind us.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 21,730 ✭✭✭✭Fred Swanson


    This post has been deleted.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,521 ✭✭✭ardle1


    If your not a Hater or 'concerned' resident, why in Gods name would you not want these concerts to go ahead,
    Please tell, we'r all dying to know....
    Someone just posted that 'some off their friends had bought tickets' but you still don't want to see the concerts go ahead! Like WTF....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,269 ✭✭✭✭hynesie08


    ardle1 wrote: »
    If your not a Hater or 'concerned' resident, why in Gods name would you not want these concerts to go ahead,
    Please tell, we'r all dying to know....
    Someone just posted that 'some off their friends had bought tickets' but you still don't want to see the concerts go ahead! Like WTF....

    Because the coucil have decided that the licenses shouldn't be granted, And no amount of crying or complaining can change that.

    So since this is the case, what sort of rational thinking adult wants this country to go back to the days where backdoor politics and ministers mates getting their way with a wink and a nudge, which is what is happening if this decision gets reversed? Is it worth setting the country back 20 years for a gig?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 2,062 ✭✭✭Tarzana


    ardle1 wrote: »
    If your not a Hater or 'concerned' resident, why in Gods name would you not want these concerts to go ahead,
    Please tell, we'r all dying to know....

    Because of a thing called empathy. You don't need to be directly involved to sympathise with the residents. Me personally, I lived in the environs of CP, as in less than 500m away from one entrance, and so have personal experience. I was there during the U2 concerts. A few day was OK but you'd get mighty sick of it after that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,541 ✭✭✭Smidge


    ardle1 wrote: »
    If your not a Hater or 'concerned' resident, why in Gods name would you not want these concerts to go ahead,
    Please tell, we'r all dying to know....
    Someone just posted that 'some off their friends had bought tickets' but you still don't want to see the concerts go ahead! Like WTF....

    Because a deal was in place and it was broken for the sake of greed.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,841 ✭✭✭✭osarusan


    ardle1 wrote: »
    If your not a Hater or 'concerned' resident, why in Gods name would you not want these concerts to go ahead,
    Please tell, we'r all dying to know....

    I live in Tokyo, and I'm one of those who wanted them to be cancelled.

    Why? Because if you make an agreement with residents, and then you unilaterally break that agreement, you do not deserve to be rewarded.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,732 ✭✭✭Arne_Saknussem


    ardle1 wrote: »
    If your not a Hater or 'concerned' resident, why in Gods name would you not want these concerts to go ahead,
    Please tell, we'r all dying to know....
    Someone just posted that 'some off their friends had bought tickets' but you still don't want to see the concerts go ahead! Like WTF....

    Hater? Are you 12 years old??


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 29,533 ✭✭✭✭end of the road


    osarusan wrote: »
    I live in Tokyo, and I'm one of those who wanted them to be cancelled.

    Why? Because if you make an agreement with residents, and then you unilaterally break that agreement, you do not deserve to be rewarded.
    breaking a supposed agreement with a few GAA hating extremists is nothing, most of the residents want the concerts it seems as they know the benefits they will bring

    I'm very highly educated. I know words, i have the best words, nobody has better words then me.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,269 ✭✭✭✭hynesie08


    breaking a supposed agreement with a few GAA hating extremists is nothing, most of the residents want the concerts it seems as they know the benefits they will bring

    How many's most? only about 40 turned out for a protest in favour of the gigs.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 86,725 ✭✭✭✭Overheal


    breaking a supposed agreement with a few GAA hating extremists is nothing, most of the residents want the concerts it seems as they know the benefits they will bring

    No, it is no "supposed" agreement. It's a pretty ironclad agreement.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 228 ✭✭Gergiev


    JRant wrote: »
    I'd say the DBA pulled those numbers from the same place the Anglo boys did, namely their ass.

    You're on the money, JR.

    Also, nobody seems to be factoring in the amount of money that GB is taking OUT of the country - by my calculations, not less than 10 million euro in his well-upholstered saddlebags.

    The economic argument is actually quite nebulous, as if you factor in that most of Brooks' fan base comes from outside Dublin, it just means that money that would usually be in circulation in other parts of Ireland gets spent in the city that weekend, instead of in the pubs, restaurants, theatres, venues, hotels, sports grounds, etc, etc, of their own localities. The only nett national gain is from those flying in from outside the country, but that has to be calculated against what Brooks is taking away with him.

    I work in the music business myself myself and have a lot of regard for Peter Aiken, but I also know that the organisers of the Aviva Stadium wouldn't - and indeed couldn't - ride roughshod over the well-heeled and better-connected residents of D4, so 3 concerts is the max that ever go on over there.

    Any sympathy I had for Brooks went out the window when he made that petulant and cretinous statement about not playing the original 3 concerts - so he's effectively decided to punish 240,000 of his own fans now to keep his vanity intact!

    The last straw for me was when the so-called mediator, Kieran Mulvey, went to the media today saying our international reputation would be in shreds if we don't find a solution. So, in other words, he's not independent at all and came to the discussions with a premeditated result in mind...

    In actual fact, a solution has been found in the judgement put forward by Owen Keegan who has assessed the situation and decided that the compromise between the various parties means everyone taking a hit - residents having to endure 3 more nights on top of the agreed 3 (One Direction) of the stadium's original planning permission and Brooks/Aiken/GAA losing 2 of their shows. But, of course, now that someone has actually shown the intellectual independence to adjudicate without fear or favour, a lot of people are suddenly seeking 'light touch regulation' again - anyone listening to Joe Duffy or Sean O'Rourke on RTE on Thursday/Friday would have been worried that they were about to self-immolate, so agitated were they that one man had the audacity to make such a decision - ie, do exactly what he is paid a lot of public money to do...

    If Brooks has any regard for his fan base, then he'll do his 3 gigs and come back next year to honour the 2 other shows as part of that World Tour he's planning. If he pulls out of the shows, then he's just the another self-serving, ego-consumed, narcissistic celebrity - the musical equivalent of 'Davos Man' - who is part of the planet's elite 'one per cent' who think the rules are only for the 'little people' - funny how they were all over the radio and TV when the first 2/3 shows sold-out proclaiming the wonder of it all, and now just playing the same 3 shows is apparently a catastrophe!

    Yeee O'Haaa, everybody...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,521 ✭✭✭ardle1


    ardle1 wrote: »
    The infrastructure around Croker is grand, who could have fore-seen that the Worlds biggest Entertainment event involving the Worlds Greatest and best selling Artist! That Ireland Dublin Croke Park would have been chosen for this Historical event..... Grab your Stetson Garth we'll be ready and waiting Yeeeeeeeeee-HAWWWWWWWWWWWW
    hynesie08 wrote: »
    Do you know what infrastructure is? Cause if so there is no way you would describe crokers as grand.

    Ok fair enough if you say so, it's just that I never heard anybody crying about it before :confused:
    It must really stink in the summer! like how do the Garbage Trucks(<<Americanism for Garth)get in through all those cycle lanes :rolleyes:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 128 ✭✭SoCal MusicLover


    Gergiev wrote: »
    You're on the money, JR.

    Also, nobody seems to be factoring in the amount of money that GB is taking OUT of the country - by my calculations, not less than 10 million euro in his well-upholstered saddlebags.

    The economic argument is actually quite nebulous, as if you factor in that most of Brooks' fan base comes from outside Dublin, it just means that money that would usually be in circulation in other parts of Ireland gets spent in the city that weekend, instead of in the pubs, restaurants, theatres, venues, hotels, sports grounds, etc, etc, of their own localities. The only nett national gain is from those flying in from outside the country, but that has to be calculated against what Brooks is taking away with him.

    This makes no sense on so many levels. First of all the money Garth is taking out of the country is through ticket sales. Which without him would not exist. And I assure you that he is not taking the full ticket face value, his share is certainly substantial, but nowhere near 100% of the 70 Euros people paid for a ticket, multiplied by 400,000.

    There is an absolute net gain to Ireland. Both from the share of ticket sales that will go to the venue and all the workers who get paid to work the gigs. And there will be a lot of those. They will make squat without the shows. There will be further gain from the revenue brought in from people like myself, who will bypass Ireland without these shows. And you can be assured that there are many coming from within Europe. Insult him, like he cares. He has a big enough fanbase there that when he tours Europe in the coming years, every show will sell out, from UK to Germany to Italy.

    Whatever, I'm wasting my time talking to you about this anyways. Just wanted to point out how wrong it was in terms of economics, but we can all see how you feel about Garth Brooks, and that is really why you're here I guess.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 468 ✭✭paddyirish23


    Overheal wrote: »
    No, it is no "supposed" agreement. It's a pretty ironclad agreement.

    Obviously not that ironclad if dcc granted 3 extra shows this year already tho


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 710 ✭✭✭Reformed Character


    It will be a fast tracked application. Only posting what I've been hearing.

    The law is explicit on the 5 week consultation period, there is no way to "fast track" it.


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement