Fat as Fooooooooookkk

SeaDaily · 21-05-2014 09:22PM

Bruno26 wrote: »

Ah don't go- was enjoying the debate- are you not going to respond to my post in other thread to explain why you think I was eating too much at 2500 calories and now eat less at 4000 calories?

What in god's name are you talking about? Leave this personal nonsense to pm's just don't clog this thread up with your non-sensical spewing.

Bruno26 · 21-05-2014 09:30PM

SeaDaily wrote: »

What in god's name are you talking about? Leave this personal nonsense to pm's just don't clog this thread up with your non-sensical spewing.

Fair enough but was accused of spamming- just debating.

Mellor · 22-05-2014 12:12AM

Bruno26 wrote: »

Thats debatable - Is bread ok? heavily processed- wheat spikes your blood sugar pretty much more than any other food

That's not true.
I can think of plenty that are higher.

Also, virtually nobody eats bread on its own. It typically comes with meat, avocado, cheese, salad, or just butter. These fillings are typically proteins/fats and reduce the impact on blood sugar. Quoting ingredients individually is pointless.

FWIW, I don't really eat wheat. I feel better without it. But I also think that the GI concept is very poorly thrown about.

Bruno26 · 22-05-2014 08:38AM

Mellor wrote: »

That's not true.
I can think of plenty that are higher.

Which ones?

Caliden · 22-05-2014 09:22AM

Bruno26 wrote: »

Which ones?

Rice/Potato/Raisins

Taylor365 · 22-05-2014 09:40AM

Chocolate/Ice-cream/Candy floss

Mellor · 22-05-2014 11:39AM

Bruno26 wrote: »

Which ones?

Watermelon, baked potato, sports drinks, rice cakes, parsnips.

And even the humble Sweet potato. When it's baked it has a GI of 95. That huge.

Bruno26 · 22-05-2014 12:42PM

I'm talking about foods from a field - either grown or run around!

Some of the foods above are processed - eg chocolate, sports drink, Ice ream

The only ones comparable or higher than wheat are watermelon rice, potato, baked sweet potato, sports drink(not a real food)

Parsnip, Chocolate, ice cream, sugar are lower.

I'm just pointing out the effects of wheat as it is a huge part of the overall populations diet.

Brian? · 22-05-2014 12:51PM

Lads, can ye get back on topic. None of the bickering is helping the OP

Taylor365 · 22-05-2014 01:13PM

Bruno26 wrote: »

I'm talking about foods from a field - either grown or run around!

Some of the foods above are processed - eg chocolate, sports drink, Ice ream

The only ones comparable or higher than wheat are watermelon rice, potato, baked sweet potato, sports drink(not a real food)

Parsnip, Chocolate, ice cream, sugar are lower.

I'm just pointing out the effects of wheat as it is a huge part of the overall populations diet.

7g sugar in 100g wheat
48g sugar in 100g dark choclate

Back on topic.

Hows the exams?

:pac:

Bruno26 · 22-05-2014 02:03PM

Taylor365 wrote: »

7g sugar in 100g wheat
48g sugar in 100g dark choclate

Back on topic.

Hows the exams?

:pac:

Do you know what GI means?

SteelyDanJalapeno · 22-05-2014 02:40PM

Bruno26 wrote: »

Do you know what GI means?

I think it means you'll get fat from carbs

Brian? · 22-05-2014 02:45PM

Bruno26 wrote: »

Do you know what GI means?

it means: ignore mod instruction again and you'll be banned. Back on topic.

Bruno26 · 22-05-2014 03:04PM

TiltedBrain wrote: »

I think it means you'll get fat from carbs

GI is a system that ranks foods by the speeds at which their carbohydrates are converted into glucose in the body; a measure of the effects of foods on blood-sugar levels.

Blacktie. · 22-05-2014 03:08PM

Bruno26 wrote: »

GI is a system that ranks foods by the speeds at which their carbohydrates are converted into glucose in the body; a measure of the effects of foods on blood-sugar levels.

GL is a more accurate tool for this.

Bruno26 · 22-05-2014 03:42PM

Blacktie. wrote: »

GL is a more accurate tool for this.

yes it is.

So even though dark choc is higher in sugar content than wheat, the carbs won't be converted into glucose as fast. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Oryx · 22-05-2014 04:22PM

Okay, this thread has gone totally awry, and the op is probably gone too.

But just in case.

Help the op or go away and start a thread on GI/Gluten elsewhere.

jamesheller · 23-05-2014 12:49PM

It looks you want to gain weight, if you want to build you muscles then its beneficial to eat this heavy meal and yes also join gym body building

SeaDaily · 23-05-2014 01:50PM

jamesheller wrote: »

It looks you want to gain weight, if you want to build you muscles then its beneficial to eat this heavy meal and yes also join gym body building

What in god's name is a "heavy meal"?

Alf Veedersane · 23-05-2014 01:57PM

SeaDaily wrote: »

What in god's name is a "heavy meal"?

Prolly meant 'heavy metal'.

A Pete Townshend fan, I'm thinking.

Minivan · 23-05-2014 11:29PM

I'm back ready to commit to a program of some sort from tomorrow!

As a few posters said previously the idea is not to gain weight but to loose it.

16 stone to around 12 would put me back in the proper bracket again.

Right so tomorrow's day one what do I eat?

I'll go gym in the morning to start off

Should I eat breakfast before the gym or after?

runawaybishop · 24-05-2014 12:21AM

If you are hungry then yes, eat. If you are not it won't make much difference at all. Have eggs and bacon for brekkie, tuna and sweetcorn salad for lunch, chicken, veg and spuds for dinner. Watch portion sizes, include protein source in each meal etc etc etc.

Bruno26 · 24-05-2014 12:40AM

runawaybishop wrote: »

If you are hungry then yes, eat. If you are not it won't make much difference at all. Have eggs and bacon for brekkie, tuna and sweetcorn salad for lunch, chicken, veg and spuds for dinner. Watch portion sizes, include protein source in each meal etc etc etc.

Avoid spuds

SeaDaily · 24-05-2014 01:21AM

Bruno26 wrote: »

Avoid spuds

Why are you still here?

Bruno26 · 24-05-2014 09:00PM

SeaDaily wrote: »

Why are you still here?

You love spuds?

Zamboni · 24-05-2014 09:36PM

Bruno26 wrote: »

Avoid spuds

This is an overweight lad who lives on chipper and chocolate.
There is no point in being a diet nazi because that will just encourage reversion.
You are not helping the OP. You are confusing the thread.

Bruno26 · 24-05-2014 09:43PM

Zamboni wrote: »

This is an overweight lad who lives on chipper and chocolate.
There is no point in being a diet nazi because that will just encourage reversion.
You are not helping the OP. You are confusing the thread.

If he's overweight he should cut out spuds- easy- will have quicker results- you can have a dinner without them.

Bruno26 · 24-05-2014 09:44PM

Zamboni wrote: »

This is an overweight lad who lives on chipper and chocolate.
There is no point in being a diet nazi because that will just encourage reversion.
You are not helping the OP. You are confusing the thread.

If he's overweight he should cut out spuds- easy- will have quicker results- you can have a dinner without them.

Alf Veedersane · 24-05-2014 09:55PM

Jesus wept.

Zamboni · 24-05-2014 09:59PM

Bruno26 wrote: »

If he's overweight he should cut out spuds- easy- will have quicker results- you can have a dinner without them.

Adherence is important. Incremental changes.
There is no point in taking a chipper guzzler and lobbing onto something like strict paleo. By day 3 he will be in the local Macari's.

You found god. Good for you. Now feck off and stop preaching like a zealot! :pac:

Fat as Fooooooooookkk

Comments