Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

what is a good wage these days?

  • 18-07-2013 12:56am
    #1
    Registered Users Posts: 296 ✭✭


    Just wondering what is considered a decent average take home wage these days for both males and females. I know during the boom 750 e may have been average. but surely that has come down now. also what makes an irish person middle class these days.? just wondering? I was thinking 500-550 as an average?


«134

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,911 ✭✭✭bradlente


    188.00


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,872 ✭✭✭RichardAnd


    It all depends on what you do so there's no real answer to the question. I get 25k a year which, for what I do, (software development) is fairly normal for the level I'm at.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,289 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    It depends entirely on your circumstances really. For someone in my industry with 10 years experience, 50k would be a fairly normal salary.

    If you're in your early 30's, single and living in a rural area in a house you inherited from your grandparents, you'd be on easy street. If it's the only income for a family of four paying a boom-time mortgage in Dublin (or renting in a decent area of Dublin) it's far from well off.

    I think the best way to judge things is to look at your welfare entitlements and add 50%. If you're earning that, you're doing alright imo.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 839 ✭✭✭Dampintheattic


    €8.65 per hour. You will be entitled to loads of freebies and benefits, which would be denied, if you were earning say, €20 per hour.
    Also you pay little tax, PRSI, USC.

    This countries tax and SW system, absolutely murders middle income earners.

    Better be well below or a long way above the middle income band, and have the same middle income earners carry the can.:o


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 822 ✭✭✭king size mars bar


    cant even get the €8.65 per hour jobs! €188 is the norm for many now (myself included), and i fear the way things are heading that will have to be reduced as we just cant afford it and the people who are in work getting hammered with taxes can give no more to the government to help fund SW etc and i wouldnt expect them too.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 296 ✭✭Carlowgirl


    Thanks interesting suggestions..
    I only work part time.. but with a good hourly rate.. but during the year I took temporary work in an office with a take home pay of 300 e per week.. It was just pocket money .. I could simply not live on it.. I was lucky I had savings to dip into ..or I was borrowing off my partner to pay back at the end of the month.. then rent bills etc .. pay back money and back to square one again !!!! I don't know how people can live on that... I did nt even get paid for my break and had a half hour lunch... only up side was I car pooled.. and it wasn't too far away...
    I don't think its possible to live on 188 either.. I think id be happy with 500 per week (if I could get work from my degree profession)... id be very content with that.. then again I live in rural area.. have no kids.. no mortgage yet.. !!!

    I wonder do people have savings anymore or are most people living week to week... im not being nosy I don't mean to ask how much people have .. just wondering.. many people I know that would have been better of than me in the boom.. have admitted there going week to week.. !!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 822 ✭✭✭king size mars bar


    i,m afraid its been week to week for me for a long time!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 33 davidholla


    It all depends where you live, any dependents etc. I earn 30k in Kilkenny at 25, rent a house(550PM), nice car, can go out drinking on weekends and save money. In Dublin I wouldn't be able to live on it because of the prices of rent.

    I left Dublin to move to Kilkenny, best decision of my life!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 221 ✭✭El Gato


    In my sector (IT/Software Engineering) the avg starting salary is circa €28k for a grad entering a grad programme with most of the well known large companies.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,236 ✭✭✭Dannyboy83


    52% of income earned after €32,800 is lost
    Vat rate of 23%,
    DIRT rate of 33%
    stealth taxes - water, property, motor tax etc.

    Essentially so much our income after the SRCOP is taken that it kind of becomes an equaliser of sorts.

    Net income from €32.8k is €26,613.20
    But a person earning €40k gross gets to keep €30k net
    And a person earning €50k gross gets to keep €34.8k net


    So for all the extra responsibility and pressure which that €50k job demands, you're not even 8k per year better off than the person earning €32k.

    This is why I personally don't see the point in worker harder or taking on more responsibility or pressure once you reach the SRCOP.
    There is insignificant financial incentive to work harder past that point.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 296 ✭✭Carlowgirl


    El Gato wrote: »
    In my sector (IT/Software Engineering) the avg starting salary is circa €28k for a grad entering a grad programme with most of the well known large companies.

    Is that net or gross?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 221 ✭✭El Gato


    Carlowgirl wrote: »
    Is that net or gross?

    Gross


  • Registered Users Posts: 296 ✭✭Carlowgirl


    Dannyboy83 wrote: »
    52% of income earned after €32,800 is lost
    Vat rate of 23%,
    DIRT rate of 33%
    stealth taxes - water, property, motor tax etc.

    Essentially so much our income after the SRCOP is taken that it kind of becomes an equaliser of sorts.

    Net income from €32.8k is €26,613.20
    But a person earning €40k gross gets to keep €30k net
    And a person earning €50k gross gets to keep €34.8k net


    So for all the extra responsibility and pressure which that €50k job demands, you're not even 8k per year better off than the person earning €32k.

    This is why I personally don't see the point in worker harder or taking on more responsibility or pressure once you reach the SRCOP.
    There is insignificant financial incentive to work harder past that point.
    Basically if your were on 32,800 you would be better off asking your boss to lower your wage to 31.5K...
    Are you saying someone on say 31.5 is better off than someone earning a couple of grand over that!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,153 ✭✭✭everdead.ie


    Dannyboy83 wrote: »
    52% of income earned after €32,800 is lost
    Vat rate of 23%,
    DIRT rate of 33%
    stealth taxes - water, property, motor tax etc.

    Essentially so much our income after the SRCOP is taken that it kind of becomes an equaliser of sorts.

    Net income from €32.8k is €26,613.20
    But a person earning €40k gross gets to keep €30k net
    And a person earning €50k gross gets to keep €34.8k net


    So for all the extra responsibility and pressure which that €50k job demands, you're not even 8k per year better off than the person earning €32k.

    This is why I personally don't see the point in worker harder or taking on more responsibility or pressure once you reach the SRCOP.
    There is insignificant financial incentive to work harder past that point.
    Yes but it takes a certain amount to get to a wage were you can live comfortably and then anything after that can be spent on luxuries and can make a big difference if you have a family.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,050 ✭✭✭youcancallmeal


    Great document detailing salaries in Irish industry here


  • Registered Users Posts: 296 ✭✭Carlowgirl


    davidholla wrote: »
    It all depends where you live, any dependents etc. I earn 30k in Kilkenny at 25, rent a house(550PM), nice car, can go out drinking on weekends and save money. In Dublin I wouldn't be able to live on it because of the prices of rent.

    I left Dublin to move to Kilkenny, best decision of my life!

    thanks for your reply.. yes my friend is living in Dublin earning about 15 e an hour but paying 850 a month for a two bed apartment... she shares with her partner.. her half of the rent is nearly our total amount of rent for a four bed house in a village...
    If we buy a house our mortgage will be less than our rent now also..

    good for you choosing quality of life over a rat race !!!kk is not too far from Dublin anyway !!!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,528 ✭✭✭gaius c


    Some figures:
    •33% of households have a gross income of less than €30,000;
    •56% of households have a gross income of less than €50,000;
    •62% of households have a gross income below the mean household income;
    •The top 20% of households have a gross income of more than €80,000 per annum;
    •14% of household have a gross income above €100,000 per annum; and
    •2% of households have gross incomes above €200,000 per annum.

    This is what actual real households are earning in this country today. €30k is actually a pretty decent wage elsewhere in the EU but our cost base is so out of whack here that a couple would struggle to get by on it, let alone a family.


  • Registered Users Posts: 296 ✭✭Carlowgirl


    Great document detailing salaries in Irish industry here

    thanks had a quick look
    going by one of my temporary jobs the figures were actually way higher there... on the list... might still be doing it if I was on that wage.. but its a good guideline thanks


  • Registered Users Posts: 296 ✭✭Carlowgirl


    gaius c wrote: »
    Some figures:
    •33% of households have a gross income of less than €30,000;
    •56% of households have a gross income of less than €50,000;
    •62% of households have a gross income below the mean household income;
    •The top 20% of households have a gross income of more than €80,000 per annum;
    •14% of household have a gross income above €100,000 per annum; and
    •2% of households have gross incomes above €200,000 per annum.

    This is what actual real households are earning in this country today. €30k is actually a pretty decent wage elsewhere in the EU but our cost base is so out of whack here that a couple would struggle to get by on it, let alone a family.

    So 62 % of us are broke basically !!!
    Is it ever going to end!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,741 ✭✭✭✭Galwayguy35


    cant even get the €8.65 per hour jobs! €188 is the norm for many now (myself included), and i fear the way things are heading that will have to be reduced as we just cant afford it and the people who are in work getting hammered with taxes can give no more to the government to help fund SW etc and i wouldnt expect them too.

    Care to elaborate what these "freebies" are?

    Just interested to know because I'm on a tenner an hour and am entitled to nothing.

    Edit

    Sorry quoted you in error, post was for Damintheatic.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,898 ✭✭✭✭Geuze


    CSO earnings data:

    http://www.cso.ie/en/statistics/earnings/

    Average hourly earnings are 22.31.

    Average weekly earnings are 697.

    See this:

    http://www.cso.ie/en/media/csoie/releasespublications/documents/earnings/2013/earnlabcosts_q12013.pdf


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 221 ✭✭El Gato


    Geuze wrote: »
    CSO earnings data:

    http://www.cso.ie/en/statistics/earnings/

    Average hourly earnings are 22.31.

    Average weekly earnings are 697.

    See this:

    http://www.cso.ie/en/media/csoie/releasespublications/documents/earnings/2013/earnlabcosts_q12013.pdf

    I really love when the CSO comes out with these figures.

    Independent studies show that over 60% of the population are below the 'national average'

    If you take the average hourly earnings, the average annual salary is €46,404.80 (based on a 40 hour week) but if you take the average weekly rate, the figure is €36,244. (which would make the average hourly rate 17.43)

    Just goes to show number may be manipulated to suit.

    Would be interesting to see, in reality, how many PAYE earners are getting almost €700 per week


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,289 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    I don't see how average annual salary can be calculated from average hour earnings without the total number of hours worked (or those reported to have been worked at least)?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 33 davidholla


    Top 20% of the country who earn a lot of money will bring those figures way up


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 221 ✭✭El Gato


    Sleepy wrote: »
    I don't see how average annual salary can be calculated from average hour earnings without the total number of hours worked (or those reported to have been worked at least)?

    I simply averaged it at a 40 hour week


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,458 ✭✭✭OMD


    El Gato wrote: »
    I really love when the CSO comes out with these figures.

    Independent studies show that over 60% of the population are below the 'national average'

    k
    Hard to call the Nevin institute independent.

    Rember in an ideal world 50% of people would be below average. . Bit like saying 50% of people are below average intelligence. Of course they are but it can take a second or two to accept that.

    In the same way saying 60% of the population are below national average sounds high but isn't really. Especially as this figure includes the unemployed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,528 ✭✭✭gaius c


    Carlowgirl wrote: »
    So 62 % of us are broke basically !!!
    Is it ever going to end!

    Just goes to show just how few people earn the 70-80k that most of my peers (engineers) seem to consider their measure of acceptable household wage.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 221 ✭✭El Gato


    OMD wrote: »
    Hard to call the Nevin institute independent.

    Rember in an ideal world 50% of people would be below average. . Bit like saying 50% of people are below average intelligence. Of course they are but it can take a second or two to accept that.

    In the same way saying 60% of the population are below national average sounds high but isn't really. Especially as this figure includes the unemployed.

    Wasn't referring to the Nevin institute tbh.

    In relation to the figures, I'm pretty sure the unemployed are not included in the salary/wage figures as they don't actually have either but income on the other hand is a different thing and earned income is different again.

    By including unemployed in these figures it should skew the figures negatively as €188 income per week is one third the national average (according to the €697 figure)


  • Registered Users Posts: 2,458 ✭✭✭OMD


    El Gato wrote: »
    Wasn't referring to the Nevin institute tbh.

    In relation to the figures, I'm pretty sure the unemployed are not included in the salary/wage figures as they don't actually have either but income on the other hand is a different thing and earned income is different again.

    By including unemployed in these figures it should skew the figures negatively as €188 income per week is one third the national average (according to the €697 figure)
    What figures were you talking about then? The earlier figures that said 62% had incomes below the national average was from Nevin Institute. Those figures included unemployed.

    Had you different figures?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,798 ✭✭✭goose2005


    davidholla wrote: »
    Top 20% of the country who earn a lot of money will bring those figures way up

    Also you can't look solely at income as a measure of wealth - it ignores assets (which are criminally undertaxed compared to income)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,597 ✭✭✭WIZE


    Im on 36k which gives me 2400 every month after tax. am better off asking for a decrease to 31K?


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 33 davidholla


    WIZE wrote: »
    Im on 36k which gives me 2400 every month after tax. am better off asking for a decrease to 31K?

    Why? extra 200 a month although nearly 3600 gone to pay berties pension :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,777 ✭✭✭✭The Corinthian


    Carlowgirl wrote: »
    Just wondering what is considered a decent average take home wage these days for both males and females. I know during the boom 750 e may have been average. but surely that has come down now. also what makes an irish person middle class these days.? just wondering? I was thinking 500-550 as an average?
    Pointless question; how can you compare a graduate in IT, with a plumber with 15 years experience, with a senior partner in a solicitor's firm, for a start? Then of course is €25k p.a. good for a single person living in Ballygospittlebackwards and the same €25k p.a. for a married person, with a family to support, in Dublin?
    Dannyboy83 wrote: »
    52% of income earned after €32,800 is lost
    Vat rate of 23%,
    DIRT rate of 33%
    stealth taxes - water, property, motor tax etc.

    Essentially so much our income after the SRCOP is taken that it kind of becomes an equaliser of sorts.

    Net income from €32.8k is €26,613.20
    But a person earning €40k gross gets to keep €30k net
    And a person earning €50k gross gets to keep €34.8k net


    So for all the extra responsibility and pressure which that €50k job demands, you're not even 8k per year better off than the person earning €32k.

    This is why I personally don't see the point in worker harder or taking on more responsibility or pressure once you reach the SRCOP.
    There is insignificant financial incentive to work harder past that point.
    Utterly depressing.

    I figured out, a long time ago, that Ireland is a good country to be young in; that is, it's a good place to start your career as it has, at least it had, good opportunities for graduates, where in many other countries graduate jobs were thin on the ground.

    However, once you reach a certain level, say middle management, there's precious incentive to remain; opportunities are fewer and you get crucified on tax the moment you're above subsistence level.

    So it's hardly surprising that once you reach 35, quite a few of us leave. I did so and am certainly not the only one who did.

    On top of this Ireland isn't cheap by international standards - correction Dublin isn't, but let's be honest, lose your job in Ballygospittlebackwards and what are the chances you'll get another job in your area locally? How many end up either having to move or commute five hours a day?

    And of course, there's the commute and there Ireland is an international disgrace; not only do we have a disastrous public transport system - slow, infrequent, disorganized with little or no integrated ticketing - but, for example, transport (not just public transport, but including your own car) is cheaper in Geneva than in Dublin. I won't tell you what income tax or salaries are there as you'll just cry.

    It's a no-brainer; once you consider salaries, cost of living and tax, Ireland is not very attractive once you're at a certain level of earning.

    I doubt I'll be coming back in a hurry, TBH. Maybe for holidays mind you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 24,289 ✭✭✭✭Sleepy


    El Gato wrote: »
    I simply averaged it at a 40 hour week
    Which means you got an erroneous result ;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,648 ✭✭✭Cody Pomeray


    Dannyboy83 wrote: »
    52% of income earned after €32,800 is lost
    Vat rate of 23%,
    DIRT rate of 33%
    stealth taxes - water, property, motor tax etc.

    Essentially so much our income after the SRCOP is taken that it kind of becomes an equaliser of sorts.

    Net income from €32.8k is €26,613.20
    But a person earning €40k gross gets to keep €30k net
    And a person earning €50k gross gets to keep €34.8k net


    So for all the extra responsibility and pressure which that €50k job demands, you're not even 8k per year better off than the person earning €32k.

    This is why I personally don't see the point in worker harder or taking on more responsibility or pressure once you reach the SRCOP.
    There is insignificant financial incentive to work harder past that point.
    This presumes that the person earning €32k and the (same) person earning €50k down the line are in similar circumstances.

    If you're married and have kids, and make a small pension contribution, as many €50k earners are, and do, then you're taxed considerably more favourably. You should be paying about €5k less in tax, therefore earning closer to, or even above €40k.

    I have limited sympathy for a €50k single person "getting by" on €35k. I think we can go much further.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭djpbarry


    Carlowgirl wrote: »
    I only work part time.. but with a good hourly rate.. but during the year I took temporary work in an office with a take home pay of 300 e per week.. It was just pocket money .. I could simply not live on it..
    Carlowgirl wrote: »
    thanks for your reply.. yes my friend is living in Dublin earning about 15 e an hour but paying 850 a month for a two bed apartment... she shares with her partner.. her half of the rent is nearly our total amount of rent for a four bed house in a village...
    So your share of the rent is, what, €50 per week? Which leaves you with about €250 out of your pay. Bills notwithstanding, how can someone with no dependents not get by on €250 per week?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭djpbarry


    El Gato wrote: »
    If you take the average hourly earnings, the average annual salary is €46,404.80 (based on a 40 hour week)...
    Well, no, because the calculation of the average hourly rate would included people who work considerably less than 40 hours per week.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,528 ✭✭✭gaius c


    This presumes that the person earning €32k and the (same) person earning €50k down the line are in similar circumstances.

    If you're married and have kids, and make a small pension contribution, as many €50k earners are, and do, then you're taxed considerably more favourably. You should be paying about €5k less in tax, therefore earning closer to, or even above €40k.

    I have limited sympathy for a €50k single person "getting by" on €35k. I think we can go much further.

    You mean increase tax on them even more?
    How about getting the lower tax band to pay their fair share of tax? A household with a married couple only pay 20% up to €41,800. That's not a fair reflection on the use of public services.

    In other news:
    Government Finance Statistics Quarterly Results
    Government revenue: up €973 million
    Government expenditure: up €1,299 million
    The deficit is up 2.5%
    Since the government can't seem to control spending, they have no option but to increase taxation and right now, it's families in the middle who are most squeezed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭djpbarry


    I have limited sympathy for a €50k single person "getting by" on €35k. I think we can go much further.
    Yeah, let's keep going until someone on €50k takes home the same amount as someone on €32k.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 221 ✭✭El Gato


    djpbarry wrote: »
    Well, no, because the calculation of the average hourly rate would included people who work considerably less than 40 hours per week.

    That's why I based my calculation on a 40 hour week (I was supposing all being equal that full time employed people work a 40 hour week....there will of course be people who work 60 or 80 hour weeks and those who work a 20 hour week) then you are getting into full time/part time statistics


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,648 ✭✭✭Cody Pomeray


    djpbarry wrote: »
    Yeah, let's keep going until someone on €50k takes home the same amount as someone on €32k.
    if they're in different family circumstances, absolutely.

    Or lets go even further.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭djpbarry


    El Gato wrote: »
    That's why I based my calculation on a 40 hour week (I was supposing all being equal that full time employed people work a 40 hour week....there will of course be people who work 60 or 80 hour weeks and those who work a 20 hour week) then you are getting into full time/part time statistics
    The average working week is stated in the report as being 31.2 hours. €22.21 times 31.2 gives €696 per week, or about €36k per year.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭djpbarry


    if they're in different family circumstances, absolutely.
    Family circumstances should have absolutely no bearing on how much tax an individual pays.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,777 ✭✭✭✭The Corinthian


    if they're in different family circumstances, absolutely.
    So why should anyone bother to study (without pay) for years or work hard when employed or even seek promotion or additional responsibility when there is no reward?

    Before you say something about self-fulfilment, let me remind you that Star Trek is fictional.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 221 ✭✭El Gato


    djpbarry wrote: »
    The average working week is stated in the report as being 31.2 hours. €22.21 times 31.2 gives €696 per week, or about €36k per year.

    I see the figures, I simply don't see how they can be correct IMO.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,648 ✭✭✭Cody Pomeray


    djpbarry wrote: »
    Family circumstances should have absolutely no bearing on how much tax an individual pays.
    Ok I disagree. I think working parents do important work and their social contribution should be reflected in their tax take. I say that as a non-parent, and indeed non-prospective parent.
    So why should anyone bother to study (without pay) for years or work hard when employed or even seek promotion or additional responsibility when there is no reward?

    Before you say something about self-fulfilment, let me remind you that Star Trek is functional.
    I am not suggesting family circumstances kick in when you reach the marginal rate of tax. The person on €30k with 2 kids and a wife (or husband, or civil partner) ought still be on more than the €30k earner with no dependents, as is the case currently.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭djpbarry


    El Gato wrote: »
    I see the figures, I simply don't see how they can be correct IMO.
    I’ve just demonstrated that they’re correct? What’s the problem?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,104 ✭✭✭✭djpbarry


    Ok I disagree. I think working parents do important work and their social contribution should be reflected in their tax take.
    Well, I have to disagree. The state should not be effectively paying people to have kids.

    If you can’t afford kids, don’t have them.
    The person on €30k with 2 kids and a wife (or husband, or civil partner) ought still be on more than the €30k earner with no dependents, as is the case currently.
    Which is utterly, utterly wrong. It’s blatant discrimination against single, childless people.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 19,777 ✭✭✭✭The Corinthian


    I am not suggesting family circumstances kick in when you reach the marginal rate of tax. The person on €30k with 2 kids and a wife (or husband, or civil partner) ought still be on more than the €30k earner with no dependents, as is the case currently.
    Actually, you suggested penalizing people on the basis that they earned 'too much' and because they hadn't children.

    By that logic, we should simply give up on higher education or careers and just screw like bunnies.

    Or would you care to qualify what you said?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,528 ✭✭✭gaius c


    Also, there's a difference between kids who live at home and those who don't. Or kids who bring in income of their own while living in the same household.

    Total can of worms.


  • Advertisement
Advertisement