Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Does anyone feel insulted by the abortion proposals?

1262729313247

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,025 ✭✭✭MaxWig


    WinterSong wrote: »

    And having to face a panel to 'prove' that you're suicidal is absolutely disgusting. I know that personally, I've just been waiting for this legislation so I can fall pregnant and pretend to be suicidal in order to procure an abortion, as have all my friends and all Irish women since the beginning of time...oh no wait, that's not true at all!

    .

    Why describe it like that?

    When you go to the doctor, and he runs tests, are you trying to prove something to him?
    Is your body trying to make a point?

    Suicidality, as with all mental health issues, is worked with, diagnosed etc... via talking.
    Funnily enough, its very often also treated by talking.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,644 ✭✭✭✭lazygal


    MaxWig wrote: »
    My dentist ripped my tooth out with a pliers.
    That doesn't make him a ganster


    It doesn't make him a very good dentist, though. None of my extractions involved ripping out my teeth.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,495 ✭✭✭✭eviltwin


    MaxWig wrote: »
    Why describe it like that?

    When you go to the doctor, and he runs tests, are you trying to prove something to him?
    Is your body trying to make a point?

    Suicidality, as with all mental health issues, is worked with, diagnosed etc... via talking.
    Funnily enough, its very often also treated by talking.

    Anyone who presents to their doctor saying they feel suicidal is generally believed, they don't have to prove to their doctor they are really feeling that way.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,025 ✭✭✭MaxWig


    eviltwin wrote: »
    Anyone who presents to their doctor saying they feel suicidal is generally believed, they don't have to prove to their doctor they are really feeling that way.

    I would contest that.

    Its always acted upon, as to not act would be unethical.

    Were the procedure for suicidality to involve invasive surgery, I'm sure there would be a few more checks and balances.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,495 ✭✭✭✭eviltwin


    MaxWig wrote: »
    I would contest that.

    Its always acted upon, as to not act would be unethical.

    Were the procedure for suicidality to involve invasive surgery, I'm sure there would be a few more checks and balances.

    Not sure what dealings you have had with medics re depression but I was always believed. Never did I feel I had to prove myself in order to be given access to medication or signed off work.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,025 ✭✭✭MaxWig


    eviltwin wrote: »
    Not sure what dealings you have had with medics re depression but I was always believed. Never did I feel I had to prove myself in order to be given access to medication or signed off work.

    Yes because signing someone off work is an extremely difficult and divisive decision to have to make.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,495 ✭✭✭✭eviltwin


    MaxWig wrote: »
    Yes because signing someone off work is an extremely difficult and divisive decision to have to make.

    You are totally missing my point. At every stage I have always been dealt with in a sensitive manner. I've never had to sit in front of someone in a formal setting, its always been a cup of tea and a chat, its been made as comfortable as possible for me. I've always been treated with respect, no one has ever asked me if I'm lying in order to get a few days off work. I've never felt anyone looked at me and wondered "what has she got to gain by claiming depression".

    Basically I've always felt that medical staff were working with me and for me and not that I was on my own. Even with that I would be a total mess going into my doctor, I had to be literally forced by my husband because I was so scared despite knowing this woman personally and having been in to her before and being familiar with the clinic and the procedure.

    And I'm what I like to think is a pretty tough cookie, I'm in my 30's and I'm not nervous around authority figures. Imagine what a teenage rape victim or a woman who is coming from a disadvanted background will feel. Its totally insensitive to treat any woman with a crisis pregnancy in such a way.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,739 ✭✭✭✭kylith


    MaxWig wrote: »
    No doubt about it.

    That does not make it an inquisition.

    My dentist ripped my tooth out with a pliers.
    That doesn't make him a ganster
    Did he insinuate you might be lying, then make you go visit 5 of his colleagues to prove that you had a toothache first?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,025 ✭✭✭MaxWig


    eviltwin wrote: »
    You are totally missing my point. At every stage I have always been dealt with in a sensitive manner. I've never had to sit in front of someone in a formal setting, its always been a cup of tea and a chat, its been made as comfortable as possible for me. I've always been treated with respect, no one has ever asked me if I'm lying in order to get a few days off work. I've never felt anyone looked at me and wondered "what has she got to gain by claiming depression".

    Basically I've always felt that medical staff were working with me and for me and not that I was on my own. Even with that I would be a total mess going into my doctor, I had to be literally forced by my husband because I was so scared despite knowing this woman personally and having been in to her before and being familiar with the clinic and the procedure.

    And I'm what I like to think is a pretty tough cookie, I'm in my 30's and I'm not nervous around authority figures. Imagine what a teenage rape victim or a woman who is coming from a disadvanted background will feel. Its totally insensitive to treat any woman with a crisis pregnancy in such a way.

    I appreciate your honesty.

    But I don't think I'm missing the point at all.

    If you required open-heart surgery (extreme example I know) to treat depression, you would still be treated with compassion, still get the tea no doubt, but there would be a much greater emphasis on getting the diagnoses right. You would be examined, by medics to ascertain the situation in as accurate a way as possible.

    Abortion is not open-heart surgery, but nor is a day off work and a cup of tea. I completely understand that some people do not believe an abortion to be as significant an event as other, that it does not carry the same implications for some as it does for others.
    But its disingenuous to suggest that accurately ascertaining whether someone is suicidal or not is some kind of Roman Catholic conspiracy


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,025 ✭✭✭MaxWig


    kylith wrote: »
    Did he insinuate you might be lying, then make you go visit 5 of his colleagues to prove that you had a toothache first?

    This is a ridiculous debate.

    I think anyone with an ounce of sense understands the job of a psychiatrist/psychologist/doctor.

    If you choose to perceive it as sinister men in white coats trying to twist your words, well, more power to you.

    keep an eye out for the Chem Trails also, might be the church too


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,468 ✭✭✭✭OldNotWIse


    kylith wrote: »
    The life of the unborn would be of no consideration to anyone if these hypothetical lying women had the means to travel to the UK. We're looking at women who don't want to be pregnant being forced to remain pregnant, being forced to risk jail by ordering pills, or being forced to lie about being suicidal simply to avail of the same procedure that a richer woman can access abroad whenever she wants. Literally no-one that I can see gives a hand-wringing shít about those women's foetuses, otherwise they'd be campaigning to remove the right to travel.


    I was speaking about the law in this jurisdiction. Hope that is ok with you.

    You are the only one constantly referring to these women as "lying women".

    I will state again, there is nothing wrong with wanting to implement safeguards to prevent abuse of the system.

    Is your argument that women will avail of abortions in the UK anyway so allow them to do so here?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,644 ✭✭✭✭lazygal


    OldNotWIse wrote: »
    I was speaking about the law in this jurisdiction. Hope that is ok with you.

    You are the only one constantly referring to these womena s "lying women".

    I will state again, there is nothing wrong with wanting to implement safeguards to prevent abuse of the system.

    Is your argument that women will avail of abortions in the UK anyway so allow them to do so here?


    Do you think women have the right to travel for abortion on request? Would you favour reviewing that right? Is accessing abortion in another jurisdiction an abuse of the right to travel?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,371 ✭✭✭Obliq


    OldNotWIse wrote: »
    Is your argument that women will avail of abortions in the UK anyway so allow them to do so here?

    I'm not speaking for Kylith here, but that would be my argument alright. It's a good argument. Women need abortion services, full stop.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,739 ✭✭✭✭kylith


    OldNotWIse wrote: »
    I was speaking about the law in this jurisdiction. Hope that is ok with you.

    You are the only one constantly referring to these women as "lying women".

    I will state again, there is nothing wrong with wanting to implement safeguards to prevent abuse of the system.

    Is your argument that women will avail of abortions in the UK anyway so allow them to do so here?

    I'm also speaking about the law in this jurisdiction.

    Yes. Women who can afford to do so will go to the UK, so why not allow them to access the service somewhere where they can be amongst their family, they can avail of counselling, and they can go home afterward rather than having to stay in a hotel? Women who cannot afford to go to the UK are being unfairly penalised because they cannot afford to travel and their choices are to have a child they don't want, risk jail time by ordering pills, or some may fake suicidal ideation to try get an abortion.

    If they will do it anyway, why not make it legal and safe, with counselling available? No-one seems to have any problem with women travelling for a termination, so why not just let them have it in their own country.

    We must be the laughing stock of Europe at this stage; catholic run education, catholic influenced reproductive rights, 'Pro-Life' groups threatening to kill politicians...


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,495 ✭✭✭✭eviltwin


    MaxWig wrote: »
    I appreciate your honesty.

    But I don't think I'm missing the point at all.

    If you required open-heart surgery (extreme example I know) to treat depression, you would still be treated with compassion, still get the tea no doubt, but there would be a much greater emphasis on getting the diagnoses right. You would be examined, by medics to ascertain the situation in as accurate a way as possible.

    Abortion is not open-heart surgery, but nor is a day off work and a cup of tea. I completely understand that some people do not believe an abortion to be as significant an event as other, that it does not carry the same implications for some as it does for others.
    But its disingenuous to suggest that accurately ascertaining whether someone is suicidal or not is some kind of Roman Catholic conspiracy

    I never mentioned the RCC :confused:

    There is nothing wrong with making sure everyone has their arse covered, I've always been a strong believer in crisis pregnancy counselling so as to avoid situations where people make decisions they later regret. My issue is the idea of a panel. There is no reason why this whole "checks and balances" thing can't be done in as sensitive a way as possible for the woman involved.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,025 ✭✭✭MaxWig


    I agree 100%


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,468 ✭✭✭✭OldNotWIse


    lazygal wrote: »
    Do you think women have the right to travel for abortion on request? Would you favour reviewing that right? Is accessing abortion in another jurisdiction an abuse of the right to travel?

    Yes.

    No.

    No.

    Happy?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,371 ✭✭✭Obliq


    1014358_10151510385466158_867062540_n.jpg

    Topical. Sadly and truly topical. :mad:


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,644 ✭✭✭✭lazygal


    OldNotWIse wrote: »
    Yes.

    No.

    No.

    Happy?


    Not really. Why shouldn't women be able to access a service here which is legal in other countries? Why is it ok to access abortion once you don't do it in the republic of Ireland? What difference does it make where the termination is carried out? Should it be difficult for women to access abortion, by making them spend time and money on it in travelling?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,484 ✭✭✭username123


    OldNotWIse wrote: »
    Yes.

    No.

    No.

    Happy?

    So then abortion is ok for those who can afford to travel.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,025 ✭✭✭MaxWig


    lazygal wrote: »
    Not really. Why shouldn't women be able to access a service here which is legal in other countries? Why is it ok to access abortion once you don't do it in the republic of Ireland? What difference does it make where the termination is carried out? Should it be difficult for women to access abortion, by making them spend time and money on it in travelling?

    Its illegal here.

    Its legal in England.

    Was that a trick question?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,371 ✭✭✭Obliq


    lazygal wrote: »
    Not really. Why shouldn't women be able to access a service here which is legal in other countries? Why is it ok to access abortion once you don't do it in the republic of Ireland? What difference does it make where the termination is carried out? Should it be difficult for women to access abortion, by making them spend time and money on it in travelling?

    ....and in spending more time on trying to access the services abroad and the finances getting there, potentially having later abortions than are necessary?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,371 ✭✭✭Obliq


    MaxWig wrote: »
    Was that a trick question?

    I got it. Are you being deliberately obtuse?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,495 ✭✭✭✭eviltwin


    MaxWig wrote: »
    Its illegal here.

    Its legal in England.

    Was that a trick question?

    But an abortion is "bad" regardless of where it actually takes place right? So why aren't the likes of YD and other groups trying to stop women from travelling to the UK. That's where the numbers are right? Exactly how many abortions do they think are going to happen here?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,468 ✭✭✭✭OldNotWIse


    lazygal wrote: »
    Not really. Why shouldn't women be able to access a service here which is legal in other countries? Why is it ok to access abortion once you don't do it in the republic of Ireland? What difference does it make where the termination is carried out? Should it be difficult for women to access abortion, by making them spend time and money on it in travelling?

    You're not happy? why? Because my opinion is not a carbon copy of yours? Will you only be happy when we are all the same?

    Just because something is legal in another country doesnt mean people should be allowed do it in here. Isnt that a fairly basic point? Do you think we should have the right to bear arms? Eusthanase? You can't just make a blanket statement like, "oh well they're allowed do it there so why not here".

    I know what you are trying to get at. You think if I really want to claim a pro life stance I should be trying to stop abortions everywhere right? As an Irish citizen, I have a right to a say in what goes on in our country.

    tbh your argument has been trotted out many times before and its just a bit...straw clutchy... Go into any court and claim you should be able to break the law because activity X, Y or Z is legal elsewhere and you'll be laughed at. Of course we can take precedence from UK supreme court etc but we have out own legal system, constitution etc. Its just not proper argument to say "well we can do it over there".


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,025 ✭✭✭MaxWig


    Obliq wrote: »
    I got it. Are you being deliberately obtuse?

    I am not.

    I find it very hard to come a (personally) satisfactory conclusion about how I feel about abortion.

    I have no religion.

    In general, I am much more inclined to agree with the pro-choice side, in most aspects of the debate. I'd share their general outlook I'm sure.

    But I'm frustrated at the level of debate.
    By all means push forward with your arguments.

    But arguing things like 'it's insulting to women to suggest they might be dishonest' riles me up. I actually find it insulting, or patronising to women (and I'm not a woman, I accept). But there is something unsettling about this suggestion that women are somehow angelic, and beyond dishonesty.

    Focus the argument.
    If you don't think a woman should have to provide a reason for a termination, argue that.
    But spare me 'women wouldn't do that' guff


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,468 ✭✭✭✭OldNotWIse


    MaxWig wrote: »
    Its illegal here.

    Its legal in England.

    Was that a trick question?


    Verbal gymnastics to try to point score I suspect.

    The types of questions they already know the answers to. In fact while you are composing your answer, they have already planned the reply to that lol


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,644 ✭✭✭✭lazygal


    OldNotWIse wrote: »
    You're not happy? why? Because my opinion is not a carbon copy of yours? Will you only be happy when we are all the same?

    Just because something is legal in another country doesnt mean people should be allowed do it in another. Isnt that a fairly basic point? Do you think we should have the right to bear arms? Eusthanase? You can't just make a blanket statement like, "oh well they're allowed do it there so why not here".

    I know what you are trying to get at. You think if I really want to claim a pro life stance I should be trying to stop abortions everywhere right? As an Irish citizen, I have a right to a say in what goes on in our country.

    tbh your argument has been trotted out many times before and its just a bit...straw clutchy... Go into any court and claim you should be able to break the law because activity X, Y or Z is legal elsewhere and you'll be laughed at. Of course we can take precedence from UK supreme court etc but we have out own legal system, constitution etc. Its just not proper argument to say "well we can do it over there".


    I still don't understand why you think its okay to travel to avail of something you think is wrong. Women have to spend time and money availing of something which is legal in most countries. What do you think women would do if they didn't have the right to travel, or the means to do so, or the UK wasn't as easily accessible? Do you think they'd just remain pregnant? Or would they try to do something about it, as women have done for millenia?

    I don't think everyone should think like I do. But I don't understand why people think its okay to deny a service to women in their country of residence, when they need it. No one has to have an abortion, your position remains unchanged if abortion on request is legal here. You don't have to have one. But to deny other women access to it because you don't agree with it is something I will never understand.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 8,427 ✭✭✭Morag


    Obliq wrote: »
    1014358_10151510385466158_867062540_n.jpg

    Topical. Sadly and truly topical. :mad:

    It is more and more like this

    abortion_pills_4.jpe%28mediaclass-wow-home-featured.a5a801a7376d2e05d347bb4d500283851310a8c7%29.jpg

    Which the new bill says they can face up to a 14 year sentence which will put many off accessing the after care the need be it medical or counseling.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,484 ✭✭✭username123


    OldNotWIse wrote: »
    You're not happy? why? Because my opinion is not a carbon copy of yours? Will you only be happy when we are all the same?

    Just because something is legal in another country doesnt mean people should be allowed do it in another. Isnt that a fairly basic point? Do you think we should have the right to bear arms? Eusthanase? You can't just make a blanket statement like, "oh well they're allowed do it there so why not here".

    I know what you are trying to get at. You think if I really want to claim a pro life stance I should be trying to stop abortions everywhere right? As an Irish citizen, I have a right to a say in what goes on in our country.

    tbh your argument has been trotted out many times before and its just a bit...straw clutchy... Go into any court and claim you should be able to break the law because activity X, Y or Z is legal elsewhere and you'll be laughed at. Of course we can take precedence from UK supreme court etc but we have out own legal system, constitution etc. Its just not proper argument to say "well we can do it over there".

    But the point is, Irish women travel to the UK to procure abortions in large numbers. Im not aware of large numbers of Irish people travelling to other jurisdictions specifically to bear arms or euthanise or any other thing that is legal elsewhere.

    Hence - there is a clear demand for abortion. So why continue to ignore that demand? We are not talking about 1 or 2 or 3 or 4 women a year here, we are talking about thousands.

    If its because abortion is bad no matter where its carried out, they why are the pro lifers not campaigning to ban travel for pregnant women? If its just "well legal things in other jurisdictions are ok" then its a hypocritical stance that ensures that only women who can afford it can have abortions.

    Surely all members of society should be treated equally, and some not have certain advantages because they have money.


Advertisement