Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Does anyone feel insulted by the abortion proposals?

1252628303147

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,644 ✭✭✭✭lazygal


    MaxWig wrote: »
    Suggestion that women lie? Its not a suggestion, its a fact of life.

    No one is suggesting that - the panel is a panel of doctors there to diagnose.

    If I go to the hospital and say I have Parkinsons, and they proceed to test me - are they insinuating that I'm lying?


    So what's your concern? Women who aren't suidical won't get access to abortion under that heading, so what is the problem?

    There's no need to paint all women as liars though, which is what comes across in your posts. No one ever said we should review the number of other proceedures carried out to make sure no one is lying about needing them. What's different about abortion services that means women telling lies is an issue?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,495 ✭✭✭✭eviltwin


    OldNotWIse wrote: »
    Have you not realised yet that we are not allowed to implement safeguards against system abuse, lest we criminalise or insult women??

    I take offence at having to show ID and bank statements when applying for credit - honestly do they think I am a thief?? My word that I will repay the money should be enough.

    It seems that safeguards against system abuse are tolerated in every other single scenario...except abortion. People get super hysterical about it. Rational discussion is....well... who knows - we've never seen it.

    I certainly do not want to see a suicidal women forced to continue with her pregnancy, but there is nothing wrong with implementation of safeguards against abuse. (Having said that I think 6 specialists is a little extreme???)

    Bank workers know 99% of the people coming into them are legit. Safeguards exist to protect against a minority. With this issue the talk from some people seems to assume most women will be lying and I have a problem with that.

    Any woman who did lie would, imho, be a very desperate woman. I don't think you're going to have women claiming to be suicidal because they want to say they beat the system or because they don't feel like going to the UK.

    But then I think the idea of any woman having to prove she has the right for an abortion whatever the reason is abhorrant anyway.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,468 ✭✭✭✭OldNotWIse


    lazygal wrote: »
    So what's your concern? Women who aren't suidical won't get access to abortion under that heading, so what is the problem?

    There's no need to paint all women as liars though, which is what comes across in your posts. No one ever said we should review the number of other proceedures carried out to make sure no one is lying about needing them. What's different about abortion services that means women telling lies is an issue?

    Maybe the small fact that there is actually another life to at least take into consideration?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,025 ✭✭✭MaxWig


    lazygal wrote: »
    So what's your concern? Women who aren't suidical won't get access to abortion under that heading, so what is the problem?

    There's no need to paint all women as liars though, which is what comes across in your posts. No one ever said we should review the number of other proceedures carried out to make sure no one is lying about needing them. What's different about abortion services that means women telling lies is an issue?

    Its not a Lie Detector test, its a medical examination, carried out by experts.

    I'm unsure how I'm painting all women as liars, except in the sense that I don't know one man or woman who is incapable of lying in a situation where it would benefit them. Not one.

    Granted I haven't met the posters on here


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,468 ✭✭✭✭OldNotWIse


    eviltwin wrote: »
    Bank workers know 99% of the people coming into them are legit. Safeguards exist to protect against a minority. With this issue the talk from some people seems to assume most women will be lying and I have a problem with that.

    Any woman who did lie would, imho, be a very desperate woman. I don't think you're going to have women claiming to be suicidal because they want to say they beat the system or because they don't feel like going to the UK.

    But then I think the idea of any woman having to prove she has the right for an abortion whatever the reason is abhorrant anyway.


    It's not about having to prove anything, she is not on trial. The specialists are just that...specialists. Therefore it is their duty and obligation to accurately assess the person appearing before them.

    Banks may know that someone is legit, but they still carry out checks to filter out those who are not.

    I do not agree with these "other people" you speak of that assume most women will be lying...but it is naiive at best to assume that NONE will.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,644 ✭✭✭✭lazygal


    OldNotWIse wrote: »
    Maybe the small fact that there is actually another life to at least take into consideration?

    You may consider it a life, but not everyone thinks that way.

    I don't think the life of a woman is exactly equal to that of a foetus, and nor does our State, even with the constitutional amendment. When there is a real and substantial risk to the life of a pregnant woman, she is entitled to avail of abortion, be it for physical or mental reasons. If a woman is happy to continue with a pregnancy, even at a risk to her life for whatever reason, that of course should be her decision. And if she wants the threat to her life dealt with, she is allowed, in Ireland, to seek that treatment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,644 ✭✭✭✭lazygal


    MaxWig wrote: »
    I don't know one man or woman who is incapable of lying in a situation where it would benefit them. Not one


    Do you see abortion as benefitting women?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,025 ✭✭✭MaxWig


    lazygal wrote: »
    Do you see abortion as benefitting women?

    In the kind of cases we're talking about, absolutely.

    Again, I'm not familiar with this 'women'.

    Who the hell are they?
    Are they really that similar to eachother?
    Fascinating


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 12,644 ✭✭✭✭lazygal


    MaxWig wrote: »
    In the kind of cases we're talking about, absolutely.

    Again, I'm not familiar with this 'women'.

    Who the hell are they?
    Are they really that similar to eachother?
    Fascinating


    You said people will lie in a situation that benefits them. What benefit does abortion confer on women (not people, as men won't need abortions) that causes them to lie to avail of one?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,739 ✭✭✭✭kylith


    If a woman is desperate enough not to be pregnant that she would go before these mental health experts and lie about being suicidal, do you not think that that is sufficient evidence to grant her an abortion? We are not talking about robbing banks here, we are talking about women potentially being desperate enough to lie to obtain a medical procedure that they cannot afford to otherwise avail of?

    And afford is the optimum word there.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,025 ✭✭✭MaxWig


    lazygal wrote: »
    You said people will lie in a situation that benefits them. What benefit does abortion confer on women (not people, as men won't need abortions) that causes them to lie to avail of one?

    Well if it doesn't benefit anyone, who the hell would want one?

    Let me guess, you are saying that benefit is far too 'nice' a word to associate with such a traumatic experience.

    Perhaps you are right, but I would have assumed that 'benefit' could be understood to be the 'bettering of a situation'


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,025 ✭✭✭MaxWig


    kylith wrote: »
    If a woman is desperate enough not to be pregnant that she would go before these mental health experts and lie about being suicidal, do you not think that that is sufficient evidence to grant her an abortion? We are not talking about robbing banks here, we are talking about women potentially being desperate enough to lie to obtain a medical procedure that they cannot afford to otherwise avail of?

    And afford is the optimum word there.

    I put that exact point to my doctor the other day - and he still wouldn't give me the valium.

    Go figure


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,495 ✭✭✭✭eviltwin


    MaxWig wrote: »
    I put that exact point to my doctor the other day - and he still wouldn't give me the valium.

    Go figure

    I can understand your point but you just see one doctor and if you are unhappy you could probably get a second opinion. I wonder would your doctor think you're lying though or would he think you did really feel you need them but that it wasn't in your best interest.

    The idea of a woman being subjected to a panel really bothers me. I hope it won't be actually that at all, that she won't have to sit in a room with these people behind a desk firing questions, I hope it will be done in a sensitive manner.

    I wonder too if she is told NO will she be able to go to the UK or will there be attempts to stop her.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,468 ✭✭✭✭OldNotWIse


    d
    lazygal wrote: »
    You may consider it a life, but not everyone thinks that way.

    I don't think the life of a woman is exactly equal to that of a foetus, and nor does our State, even with the constitutional amendment. When there is a real and substantial risk to the life of a pregnant woman, she is entitled to avail of abortion, be it for physical or mental reasons. If a woman is happy to continue with a pregnancy, even at a risk to her life for whatever reason, that of course should be her decision. And if she wants the threat to her life dealt with, she is allowed, in Ireland, to seek that treatment.

    I'm not saying she shouldnt be entitled, someone essentially asks "why is it such an issue if she lies" (as distinct from lying with regards to other procedures) and I think it's fairly obvious what distinguishes it from other procedures...namely that the life of the unborn is also under consideration. perhaps you dont think of it as a life and thats fine, but some people clearly do...hence the reason the debate is so polarised...I mean...isn't that obvious? were it not for the unborn, people would not be so divided on the issue.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,739 ✭✭✭✭kylith


    OldNotWIse wrote: »
    d

    I'm not saying she shouldnt be entitled, someone essentially asks "why is it such an issue if she lies" (as distinct from lying with regards to other procedures) and I think it's fairly obvious what distinguishes it from other procedures...namely that the life of the unborn is also under consideration. perhaps you dont think of it as a life and thats fine, but some people clearly do...hence the reason the debate is so polarised...I mean...isn't that obvious? were it not for the unborn, people would not be so divided on the issue.

    The life of the unborn would be of no consideration to anyone if these hypothetical lying women had the means to travel to the UK. We're looking at women who don't want to be pregnant being forced to remain pregnant, being forced to risk jail by ordering pills, or being forced to lie about being suicidal simply to avail of the same procedure that a richer woman can access abroad whenever she wants. Literally no-one that I can see gives a hand-wringing shít about those women's foetuses, otherwise they'd be campaigning to remove the right to travel.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,025 ✭✭✭MaxWig


    kylith wrote: »
    The life of the unborn would be of no consideration to anyone if these hypothetical lying women had the means to travel to the UK. We're looking at women who don't want to be pregnant being forced to remain pregnant, being forced to risk jail by ordering pills, or being forced to lie about being suicidal simply to avail of the same procedure that a richer woman can access abroad whenever she wants. Literally no-one that I can see gives a hand-wringing shít about those women's foetuses, otherwise they'd be campaigning to remove the right to travel.

    The 'other jurisdiction' thing is a red-herring.

    Its simply not relevant in terms of legislation


  • Posts: 81,310 CMod ✭✭✭✭ Amanda Tangy Halogen


    MaxWig wrote: »
    The 'other jurisdiction' thing is a red-herring.

    Its simply not relevant in terms of legislation

    It's specifically allowed for in legislation so ... I guess they didn't agree


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,025 ✭✭✭MaxWig


    bluewolf wrote: »
    It's specifically allowed for in legislation so ... I guess they didn't agree

    In terms of legislating for suicide


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 35,514 ✭✭✭✭efb


    The issue about lying is the 'floodgates' scenario people claiming floodgates will open if you include suicide ideation, as many women would use this to procure an abortion. This I feel, is insensitive to women and those suffering mental illness


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,557 ✭✭✭the_monkey


    Morgase wrote: »
    Same here. If I hear "real and substantial risk to the life of the mother" once more, I might just explode.

    And as for suicide not being a "proper risk" it shows what this country's attitudes towards mental health really are.


    Spot on.

    Good thread.

    As they say if men could get pregnant abortion would NEVER have been illegal in this great little green country.


    Ireland: still run by oul lads mentality.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,025 ✭✭✭MaxWig


    the_monkey wrote: »
    Spot on.

    Good thread.

    As they say if men could get pregnant abortion would NEVER have been illegal in this great little green country.


    Ireland: still run by oul lads mentality.

    As they say if men could get pregnant abortion would NEVER have been illegal in this great little green country?

    And if my aunt had balls, she'd be my uncle.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,025 ✭✭✭MaxWig


    efb wrote: »
    The issue about lying is the 'floodgates' scenario people claiming floodgates will open if you include suicide ideation, as many women would use this to procure an abortion. This I feel, is insensitive to women and those suffering mental illness

    This argument is so daft its hard to fathom.

    If we are to accept suicidality as a exception, it has to be measured.

    Are you seriously, genuinely suggesting a scenario whereby someone simply says "I'm suicidal' and they're handed a gown?

    If that were to be the case, it would simply be a secret word. May as well be 'open sesame'


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 35,514 ✭✭✭✭efb


    MaxWig wrote: »
    This argument is so daft its hard to fathom.

    If we are to accept suicidality as a exception, it has to be measured.

    Are you seriously, genuinely suggesting a scenario whereby someone simply says "I'm suicidal' and they're handed a gown?

    If that were to be the case, it would simply be a secret word. May as well be 'open sesame'

    That's nothing got to do with the point Im making.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,025 ✭✭✭MaxWig


    efb wrote: »
    That's nothing got to do with the point Im making.

    Sorry if I misunderstood :)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 35,514 ✭✭✭✭efb


    MaxWig wrote: »
    This argument is so daft its hard to fathom.

    If we are to accept suicidality as a exception, it has to be measured.

    Are you seriously, genuinely suggesting a scenario whereby someone simply says "I'm suicidal' and they're handed a gown?

    If that were to be the case, it would simply be a secret word. May as well be 'open sesame'

    But on your point a Spanish Inquisition type diagnosis is equally unfair


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,025 ✭✭✭MaxWig


    efb wrote: »
    But on your point a Spamish Inquisition type diagnosis is equally unfair

    Doctors diagnosing a patient is hardly the Spanish Inquisition.

    Every day in A&Es throughout the country, these calls are being made.
    Someone says they are suicidal - first the nurses make a judgement call - then, if deemed necessary a psychologist/psychiatrist is summoned.

    Its not an inquisition.

    Its called medicine


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 35,514 ✭✭✭✭efb


    MaxWig wrote: »
    Doctors diagnosing a patient is hardly the Spanish Inquisition.

    Every day in A&Es throughout the country, these calls are being made.
    Someone says they are suicidal - first the nurses make a judgement call - then, if deemed necessary a psychologist/psychiatrist is summoned.

    Its not an inquisition.

    Its called medicine
    Going up in front of a number of experts can be an ordeal


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,380 ✭✭✭WinterSong


    I honestly just find it difficult to fathom that there are people who genuinely believe that a woman should not be legally able to terminate a life-threatening pregnancy, and that this is a source of 'debate'. The X case makes it clear that the Constitution allows for abortion in such circumstances, and subsequent referenda did not limit its scope. So when people are opposed to the very fact of the legislation, never mind its content/substance, I have sincere difficulty understanding that.

    And having to face a panel to 'prove' that you're suicidal is absolutely disgusting. I know that personally, I've just been waiting for this legislation so I can fall pregnant and pretend to be suicidal in order to procure an abortion, as have all my friends and all Irish women since the beginning of time...oh no wait, that's not true at all!

    I just find the whole thing utterly mind-boggling and frustrating in the extreme.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,025 ✭✭✭MaxWig


    efb wrote: »
    Going up in front of a number of experts can be an ordeal

    No doubt about it.

    That does not make it an inquisition.

    My dentist ripped my tooth out with a pliers.
    That doesn't make him a ganster


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 17,495 ✭✭✭✭eviltwin


    MaxWig wrote: »
    No doubt about it.

    That does not make it an inquisition.

    My dentist ripped my tooth out with a pliers.
    That doesn't make him a ganster

    Thats what it feels like though, it would be hard enough to do that if you were mentally well, when you are fragile its horrible. A lot of the women forced to do this will probably be vulnerable anyway and might not have the skills to deal with authority figures.

    The lack of sensitivity around it just disgusts me. Even if a woman is lying she is still looking for an abortion for a reason, she is dealing with a crisis pregnancy, possible she might have been the victim of a rape and we're asking her to sit in front of a panel?? :confused:


Advertisement