Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Sinn Féin,s "Republic Day".

1121315171820

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 596 ✭✭✭Thomas_I


    Iwasfrozen wrote: »
    The quotation header in both your quotes was "iwasfrozen of the British"

    I´m not aware that was my fault, I´ve just taken a copy of the quotation header and it has been already there, I´ve not inserted it. I wouldn´t have even thought of doing such stupid things. Maybe something got wrong by doing the copy and paste.

    Well, next time I´ll pay more attention to this. I´m sorry for the mistake if this has been in my doing, but there was no intention from my side.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,250 ✭✭✭✭Iwasfrozen


    Thomas_I wrote: »
    I´m not aware that was my fault, I´ve just taken a copy of the quotation header and it has been already there, I´ve not inserted it. I wouldn´t have even thought of doing such stupid things. Maybe something got wrong by doing the copy and paste.

    Well, next time I´ll pay more attention to this. I´m sorry for the mistake if this has been in my doing, but there was no intention from my side.
    Ah that's ok, I didn't realise it was a mistake no offence taken.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,453 ✭✭✭jugger0


    Iwasfrozen wrote: »
    I assume you understand the difference between stae and country and just choose to ignore it. These people were ethnically Irish but they were not Irish citizens. We had no moral duty to protect them.

    They are Irish, some fake state created out of unionist fear doesn't change that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,453 ✭✭✭jugger0


    Why do you even bother?

    Sure what is the point of you screaming for a United Ireland when in reality you hate the very people who are opposed to it. A distinct people who are completely different you. A people who have a culture of their own. Different values, different religion, different political ideology and even a different brand of music in many ways and even a different background to you and people from the Irish race.

    So why bother? Just leave the Ulster Scots alone and stop trying to unite a people who don't care or want to be united with you. It is a complete waste of time.

    Great culture!



    A cancer on this island.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,250 ✭✭✭✭Iwasfrozen


    jugger0 wrote: »
    They are Irish, some fake state created out of unionist fear doesn't change that.
    Why is Northern Ireland a fake state? Looks real to me.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,069 ✭✭✭✭LordSutch


    jugger0 wrote: »
    Great culture!

    A cancer on this island.

    I would guess that 99.9% of Unionists would be disgusted, disheartned and annoyed by the rabble in that clip (post#426).


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,453 ✭✭✭jugger0


    Completely irrelevant to the point about a group of people in Ulster who are just different from you and don't want anything to do with you. Why can't some Republicans accept that?

    I struggle to see why they waste so much energy trying to unite with a people who want to be left alone?

    I dont want a United Ireland with Unionists, best case scenario would be for them to take their own advice and go home, the British should of done the right thing and brought all the colonists back with them after the war of independence, instead they left us with the mess that is Northern Ireland.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 596 ✭✭✭Thomas_I


    LordSutch wrote: »
    I would guess that 99.9% of Unionists would be disgusted, disheartned and annoyed by the rabble in that clip (post#426).

    I´d set the scale of that percentage much lower. Lucky if it would just 50% of them. Anyway, it´s difficult to sort that scale out because as everywhere, you´ve the rational people and the usual posers.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,453 ✭✭✭jugger0


    LordSutch wrote: »
    I would guess that 99.9% of Unionists would be disgusted, disheartned and annoyed by the rabble in that clip (post#426).


    Be honest, its clear the majority of Unionists would applaud this, no surrender! kill all taigs etc Anything Irish and catholic is abhorrent to the vast majority of unionists.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,069 ✭✭✭✭LordSutch


    Thomas_I wrote: »
    I´d set the scale of that percentage much lower. Lucky if it would just 50% of them. Anyway, it´s
    difficult to sort that scale out because as everywhere, you´ve the rational people and the usual posers.

    Just to point out I did say 'Unionists' as opposed to Loyalists, a subtle difference no doubt, but a difference non the less.

    I would still stand by my 99.9%.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,066 ✭✭✭✭Happyman42



    you hate the very people who are opposed to it.

    Absolutely and profoundly wrong, and the usual mistake of somebody who doesn't understand the problem.
    I genuinely believe had they held out for a complete British withdrawal we would all be looking forward to St Paddy's Day followed by the 12th and celebrating warmly the diversity that makes us Irish.
    Things always move on, it would have been painful but it has been hugely painful anyway, it has just been over a longer period of time. Had the men/women of that time had the balls (currently discussing on another thread, another time when we -the Irish republic - had the oppurtuntiy to alter the course of events) we would be approaching almost a century of peace on this island, this entire island.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,382 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    jugger0 wrote: »
    I dont want a United Ireland with Unionists, best case scenario would be for them to take their own advice and go home, the British should of done the right thing and brought all the colonists back with them after the war of independence, instead they left us with the mess that is Northern Ireland.
    NI isn't a mess?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 596 ✭✭✭Thomas_I


    LordSutch wrote: »
    Just to point out I did say 'Unionists' as opposed to Loyalists, a subtle difference no doubt, but a difference non the less.

    I would still stand by my 99.9%.

    I think that there is a chance that all these things are shifting to a more individual consideration by both communities (Unionist / Loyalists). At least I´d hope so. Your 99.9% are very optimistic, indeed.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,453 ✭✭✭jugger0


    NI isn't a mess?

    Yes it is, half the "country" hate the other half and jump at the opportunity to beat lumps out of each other, have you forgot the troubles so soon? wouldn't take much to start it off again.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,489 ✭✭✭Yamanoto


    jugger0 wrote: »
    Be honest, its clear the majority of Unionists would applaud this, no surrender! kill all taigs etc Anything Irish and catholic is abhorrent to the vast majority of unionists.

    Step away from the keyboard, you're making yourself look silly tbh.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2, Paid Member Posts: 23,382 ✭✭✭✭Ash.J.Williams


    jugger0 wrote: »
    Yes it is, half the "country" hate the other half and jump at the opportunity to beat lumps out of each other, have you forgot the troubles so soon? wouldn't take much to start it off again.
    no they dont


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,069 ✭✭✭✭LordSutch


    Thomas_I wrote: »
    At least I´d hope so. Your 99.9% are very optimistic, indeed.

    Maybe you need to re-evaluate the term Unionist (as opposed to Loyalist) and the kind of people they are?

    Far too often recently, the term Unionist has been deliberately inserted into certain situations where the protagonists could only be described as 'Loyalists' (of the extreme variety), so the term Unionist is deliberately being degraded by some . . .

    I would describe the "famine song" pipe band outside the church as Loyalists, and not very nice ones at that.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,453 ✭✭✭jugger0


    no they dont


    Are you serious? they've been shooting and blowing each other to pieces for years and suddenly everything's fine and dandy? lol


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 596 ✭✭✭Thomas_I


    Happyman42 wrote: »
    Absolutely and profoundly wrong, and the usual mistake of somebody who doesn't understand the problem.
    I genuinely believe had they held out for a complete British withdrawal we would all be looking forward to St Paddy's Day followed by the 12th and celebrating warmly the diversity that makes us Irish.
    Things always move on, it would have been painful but it has been hugely painful anyway, it has just been over a longer period of time. Had the men/women of that time had the balls (currently discussing on another thread, another time when we -the Irish republic - had the oppurtuntiy to alter the course of events) we would be approaching almost a century of peace on this island, this entire island.

    If you would only for one moment consider the British point of view at that time you´d either reject this view or you´d see clearly what was at stake in 1921.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,250 ✭✭✭✭Iwasfrozen


    jugger0 wrote: »
    Are you serious? they've been shooting and blowing each other to pieces for years and suddenly everything's fine and dandy? lol
    Yes, it's called progress. You're also wrong when you say half the country hate the other half, the number of bigots on wither side of the divide is no where near 50%.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 596 ✭✭✭Thomas_I


    LordSutch wrote: »
    Maybe you need to re-evaluate the term Unionist (as opposed to Loyalist) and the kind of people they are?

    Far too often recently, the term Unionist has been deliberately inserted into certain situations where the protagonists could only be described as 'Loyalists' (of the extreme variety), so the term Unionist is deliberately being degraded by some . . .

    I would describe the "famine song" pipe band outside the church as Loyalists, and not very nice ones at that.

    Well, I know about the difference between Unionists and Loyalists, but they´re both backing the Union and therefore in this regards, I take them as one unit. I admit that this also comes from what you´ve said.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 596 ✭✭✭Thomas_I


    Iwasfrozen wrote: »
    Yes, it's called progress. You're also wrong when you say half the country hate the other half, the number of bigots on wither side of the divide is no where near 50%.

    I see it also that way. I´ll get my coat.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,453 ✭✭✭jugger0


    Iwasfrozen wrote: »
    Yes, it's called progress. You're also wrong when you say half the country hate the other half, the number of bigots on wither side of the divide is no where near 50%.

    Do nationalist's suddenly look forward to the 12th? the famine song? the Tri-color sitting on top of a bonfire? these aren't going to go away any time soon and neither will the divide and hatred.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 18,066 ✭✭✭✭Happyman42


    Thomas_I wrote: »
    If you would only for one moment consider the British point of view at that time you´d either reject this view or you´d see clearly what was at stake in 1921.

    The next century of peace was at stake, they got it tragically wrong and continued to 'get it wrong'.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 16,250 ✭✭✭✭Iwasfrozen


    jugger0 wrote: »
    Do nationalist's suddenly look forward to the 12th? the famine song? the Tri-color sitting on top of a bonfire? these aren't going to go away any time soon and neither will the divide and hatred.
    I'm sure they don't but coming to terms with these traditions is the price of peace. The orange order and 12th of July celebrations won't go away if there is ever a united Ireland.


  • Moderators, Politics Moderators, Sports Moderators Posts: 24,279 Mod ✭✭✭✭Chips Lovell


    jugger0 wrote: »
    They are Irish, some fake state created out of unionist fear doesn't change that.
    jugger0 wrote: »
    I dont want a United Ireland with Unionists, best case scenario would be for them to take their own advice and go home, the British should of done the right thing and brought all the colonists back with them after the war of independence, instead they left us with the mess that is Northern Ireland.
    jugger0 wrote: »
    Be honest, its clear the majority of Unionists would applaud this, no surrender! kill all taigs etc Anything Irish and catholic is abhorrent to the vast majority of unionists.

    You really aren't doing your side of the debate any favours here with this kind of stuff.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,453 ✭✭✭jugger0


    Iwasfrozen wrote: »
    I'm sure they don't but coming to terms with these traditions is the price of peace. The orange order and 12th of July celebrations won't go away if there is ever a united Ireland.

    If there was ever a United Ireland there would be war without a shadow of a doubt, king Billys finest would never be lumped in with the free stater's.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,453 ✭✭✭jugger0


    You really aren't doing your side of the debate any favours here with this kind of stuff.

    The Truth hurts but id rather live in reality then PC lala land like yourself.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Iwasfrozen wrote: »
    I'm sure they don't but coming to terms with these traditions is the price of peace. The orange order and 12th of July celebrations won't go away if there is ever a united Ireland.

    Neither will Republicanism, which is something some have yet to take on board.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,441 ✭✭✭old hippy


    This argument... seems... familiar.... :(


This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement
Advertisement