Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

**Chemistry...Before/After

Options
1…1314161819…27

Comments

  • Options
    #452
    TMCGY
    Registered Users Posts: 44 ✭TMCGY


    SuchGold wrote: »
    Yeah I got like 53000 or something. Just realised its 101 kPa..

    Are you ment to change that? :confused:


  • Options
    #453
    Liveforrugby
    Registered Users Posts: 343 ✭✭Liveforrugby


    The experiment questions made me cum


  • Options
    #454
    Liveforrugby
    Registered Users Posts: 343 ✭✭Liveforrugby


    TMCGY wrote: »
    Are you ment to change that? :confused:

    Everything has to be changed to standard units. Don't worry everyone makes that mistake, you won't lose much


  • Options
    #455
    Mista
    Registered Users Posts: 183 ✭✭Mista


    That was brilliant! :D :pac:


  • Options
    #456
    ChemHickey
    Closed Accounts Posts: 3,479 ✭✭✭ChemHickey


    Lovely paper. extremely happy. =) It was Fair anyway.


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #457
    TMCGY
    Registered Users Posts: 44 ✭TMCGY


    Liveforrugby wrote: »
    Everything has to be changed to standard units. Don't worry everyone makes that mistake, you won't lose much

    I changed the others but didnt know you had to change the kPa something else!


  • Options
    #458
    ei.sderob
    Closed Accounts Posts: 108 ✭✭ei.sderob


    What did ye get for the last part of question 2?? It kinda confused me. Overall the paper was nice!


  • Options
    #459
    Dicksboro_man
    Registered Users Posts: 414 ✭✭Dicksboro_man


    did anyone get else get a funny KC figure for q11 b at around 500 or something (3 digit figures anyway :) )?


  • Options
    #460
    Cosmic.Postman
    Registered Users Posts: 59 ✭✭Cosmic.Postman


    ei.sderob wrote: »
    What did ye get for the last part of question 2?? It kinda confused me. Overall the paper was nice!

    I got 8, pretty sure that was right.


  • Options
    #461
    Mista
    Registered Users Posts: 183 ✭✭Mista


    ei.sderob wrote: »
    What did ye get for the last part of question 2?? It kinda confused me. Overall the paper was nice!

    12 full tubes :)


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #462
    mrboswell
    Registered Users Posts: 1,188 ✭✭✭mrboswell


    Any chance someone can scan it in and mail it to me?


  • Options
    #463
    checkcheek
    Registered Users Posts: 207 ✭✭checkcheek


    Dicksboro_man wrote: »
    did anyone get else get a funny KC figure for q11 b at around 500 or something (3 digit figures anyway :) )?


    I got 700 or something like thAt


  • Options
    #464
    finality
    Registered Users Posts: 1,763 ✭✭✭finality


    TMCGY wrote: »
    Do able paper! Anyone else get a really wierd number for the volatile liquid calculation??

    I got 0.1 moles, seemed fine to me.


    I'm so happy with that paper. I think I managed the A1 :D Definitely not below an A2. Woo my teacher will be so surprised, big improvement from my C2 in the mock.


  • Options
    #465
    Cosmic.Postman
    Registered Users Posts: 59 ✭✭Cosmic.Postman


    Mista wrote: »
    12 full tubes :)

    Did you remember it was a 60% yield? And did you use 22.4 or 24 litres?


  • Options
    #466
    Liveforrugby
    Registered Users Posts: 343 ✭✭Liveforrugby


    Dicksboro_man wrote: »
    did anyone get else get a funny KC figure for q11 b at around 500 or something (3 digit figures anyway :) )?

    That was a trick question, you were supposed to rearange the sides or use the inverse of kc


  • Options
    #467
    Mista
    Registered Users Posts: 183 ✭✭Mista


    Cosmic.Postman wrote: »
    Did you remember it was a 60% yield? And did you use 22.4 or 24 litres?

    Yes, and 24.


  • Options
    #468
    Cosmic.Postman
    Registered Users Posts: 59 ✭✭Cosmic.Postman


    finality wrote: »
    I got 0.1 moles, seemed fine to me.

    Did you get 58 point something for the RMM then?


  • Options
    #469
    Rossie17
    Registered Users Posts: 111 ✭✭Rossie17


    mrboswell wrote: »
    Any chance someone can scan it in and mail it to me?

    Yeah me too please? That would be great!!


  • Options
    #470
    Liveforrugby
    Registered Users Posts: 343 ✭✭Liveforrugby


    I got 8 full tubes


  • Options
    #471
    ei.sderob
    Closed Accounts Posts: 108 ✭✭ei.sderob


    i got 13:/ Anyhoo, I just got confused towards the end as I basically just proved that the yield was 60 percent. Not really sure how I got 13:P


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #472
    finality
    Registered Users Posts: 1,763 ✭✭✭finality


    Cosmic.Postman wrote: »
    I got 8, pretty sure that was right.

    I got 8 too, I agree, confident that it's right.

    I also got a 3 digit figure for Kc, but I'm pretty sure it's right.


  • Options
    #473
    Liveforrugby
    Registered Users Posts: 343 ✭✭Liveforrugby


    Explain why the pressure of the vapour is the same as atmospheric pressure? Answers please?


  • Options
    #474
    kyle84
    Registered Users Posts: 21 ✭kyle84


    i got 8,questions 4,6,7,8 and 9 were so easy


  • Options
    #475
    Cosmic.Postman
    Registered Users Posts: 59 ✭✭Cosmic.Postman


    finality wrote: »
    I got 8 too, I agree, confident that it's right.

    I also got a 3 digit figure for Kc, but I'm pretty sure it's right.

    I got around 402 for Kc? :S


  • Options
    #476
    finality
    Registered Users Posts: 1,763 ✭✭✭finality


    Liveforrugby wrote: »
    That was a trick question, you were supposed to rearange the sides or use the inverse of kc

    Why though?


  • Options
    #477
    Liveforrugby
    Registered Users Posts: 343 ✭✭Liveforrugby


    finality wrote: »
    I got 8 too, I agree, confident that it's right.

    I also got a 3 digit figure for Kc, but I'm pretty sure it's right.

    Did you re arrenge it or inverse it?


  • Options
    #478
    ivanh
    Closed Accounts Posts: 72 ✭✭ivanh


    That was a shocking paper.. :(

    Definitely not getting an A1 or anywhere near it!

    Disappointed is not the word

    UGH


  • Options
    #479
    kyle84
    Registered Users Posts: 21 ✭kyle84


    i didnt do equilibrium,one are of chemistry i seem to not lik for no apparent reason :L


  • Options
    #480
    Liveforrugby
    Registered Users Posts: 343 ✭✭Liveforrugby


    finality wrote: »
    Why though?

    Look at it again, look at the arrows


  • Advertisement
  • Options
    #481
    ei.sderob
    Closed Accounts Posts: 108 ✭✭ei.sderob


    Oh and the question on the rate of raction, what was the shape of the second graph for ye? Mine was less steep due to the lower concentration and it levelled off lower down due to the marble chips being excess like.


Advertisement