Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie
Hi there,
There is an issue with role permissions that is being worked on at the moment.
If you are having trouble with access or permissions on regional forums please post here to get access: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058365403/you-do-not-have-permission-for-that#latest

Are you going to pay the household charge? [Part 1]

1113114116118119200

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,183 ✭✭✭dvpower


    greenpilot wrote: »
    If you dont care about DVpower, do what hundreds have done already...put him on the ignore list...which is where he is going now...

    Echo ... Echo ... Echo ...
    :D


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 15,858 ✭✭✭✭paddy147


    dvpower wrote: »
    Echo ... Echo ... Echo ...
    :D


    Better go and ask "Enda" to open up a FG bar tab in the dail bar,so that you and the rest of them and go and drown your sorrrows on April 1st and ask each other
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    .
    "where did it all go wrong then".



    Or maybe James O'Rielly might throw the HSE credit card accross the dail bar and say "put it on that"


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,062 ✭✭✭Slick50


    dvpower wrote: »
    You haven't been paying attention... (people were complaining about me doing the selective quoting, not the other way around)

    Yes I have. You were whinging about being selectively quoted, when I quoted two of your posts that also completely contradicted each other(but you seem to think they were completely consistant), asking which it was. In one you said you weren't arguing for a property tax, but in the other you said you thought they were a good idea. I suppose you'll be looking for a link.
    dvpower wrote: »
    ...even to the national news.

    WTF.???? Can't you answer the question?.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 4,210 ✭✭✭argosy2006


    dvpower wrote: »
    There is also a potential €2500 fine to consider.
    http://hall.hdfillms.netdna-cdn.com/wp-content/uploads/3d-movie-glasses.jpg


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,183 ✭✭✭dvpower


    Slick50 wrote: »
    WTF.???? Can't you answer the question?.
    What question do you want answered?


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,583 ✭✭✭mconigol


    dvpower wrote: »
    Echo ... Echo ... Echo ...
    :D

    Finally...he posts what's actually going on in his head :D


  • Registered Users Posts: 19 kepler_johan


    dvpower wrote: »
    There is also a potential €2500 fine to consider.

    Key word there is "potential"...

    I'd refer you to this website...
    http://nohouseholdtax.org/your-questions-answered/

    in particular Question 5.
    5. What are the possible consequences if I don’t register?

    The legislation allows for a fine of up to €2,500 for failing to register by 31st March. But this is not an automatic fine. Under the legislation people who don’t register have to be brought to court and have a case proved against them that they did not register. This is where the importance of building a mass campaign comes in. The government wants 1.8 million households to register by the end of March. But imagine the situation if a million plus households do not register. It would be absolutely impossible for them to take a million people to court.
    And just as we did during the campaign against water charges in Dublin in the 1990s, the campaign will organise legal representation for anyone who is taken to court. By challenging each case, we can ensure that the system becomes completely clogged up. As also happened during the campaign against water charges, if someone in an area is taken to court we can organise to ensure that hundreds of fellow non-payers turn up to support them.

    I think I'm good...


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 5,731 ✭✭✭Bullseye1


    Interesting and insightful post in the politics discussion on same topic. It speaks for itself. We pay more so that they can maintain current salaries and pensions.

    Good loser wrote: »
    As a public sector pensioner I also agree.

    What amazes me about this household charge is how many public servants and social welfare recipients oppose it for all sorts of spurious and contradictory reasons.

    Surely all public servants/social werfares should favour all tax raising measures as the only alternative is - ultimately - cutting their salaries, pensions and benefits.

    Remember FF, FG and Labour favoured this property tax in the last election. It's democratic.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,653 ✭✭✭Ghandee


    dvpower wrote: »
    What question do you want answered?

    Would you agree that the current govt is, but a fanny hair off declaring war on its own citizens with its latest bully boy tactics?

    If its against the law, we'll change the fcuking law Edna!



    when those who make the law, break the law, their is no law!


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,183 ✭✭✭dvpower


    Key word there is "potential"...

    I'd refer you to this website...
    http://nohouseholdtax.org/your-questions-answered/

    in particular Question 5.



    I think I'm good...
    Yeah. Its only a potential cost, as I said.

    Big claim from the No campaign in the second paragraph - that they will organise legal representation for anyone brought to court. I wonder how they plan on financing this. Maybe they mean that they will phone a lawyer for you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,709 ✭✭✭greenpilot


    Where To wrote: »
    I will pay and so will 90% of the people who say the won't.

    Armchair rebels surrender easily.

    Remember this classic?......oh, theres more, theres more!!


  • Registered Users Posts: 19 kepler_johan


    dvpower wrote: »
    Yeah. Its only a potential cost, as I said.

    Big claim from the No campaign in the second paragraph - that they will organise legal representation for anyone brought to court. I wonder how they plan on financing this. Maybe they mean that they will phone a lawyer for you.

    Based on the numbers coming from the Alexa website, I'll have a better chance winning the lotto than ending up in court. I've researched the topic and have come to this decision based on the information and the numbers of people who have registered/not registered. I'll take my chances, thanks very much.

    If you are happy to pay the €100 this year, then who knows how much more next year on the household tax that's your decision. I won't try to convince you otherwise, it's your business, but I'm not going to pay and I'm not changing my mind based on the comments you've given.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 15,858 ✭✭✭✭paddy147


    dvpower wrote: »
    Yeah. Its only a potential cost, as I said.

    Big claim from the No campaign in the second paragraph - that they will organise legal representation for anyone brought to court. I wonder how they plan on financing this. Maybe they mean that they will phone a lawyer for you.


    How do the solicitors of "New Beginning" work then,when they are represnting people in court,who are having their house taken back by a bank??

    They work for free (no cost to their client).

    Theres also FLAC too.



    You really are a clueless idiot.:rolleyes::rolleyes:

    And the more you post here,the more and more you show it too.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,129 ✭✭✭Wild Bill


    Biggins wrote: »
    RTE news just reported that only one sixth of those liable for the charge, so far have now paid it.

    If they weren't in Gilmore's pocket they'd have said five out of six of those liable have not paid it.

    Let's stop paying the TV tax (aka licence) while we're at it.....


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 304 ✭✭Izzy Skint


    dvpower wrote: »
    Yeah. Its only a potential cost, as I said.

    Big claim from the No campaign in the second paragraph - that they will organise legal representation for anyone brought to court. I wonder how they plan on financing this. Maybe they mean that they will phone a lawyer for you.
    If our [EMAIL="cr@p"]useless[/EMAIL] politicians start bringing people to court over non payment of this immoral tax, then they will probably need to call the army onto the streets....make no mistake, since the bank guarantee was announced an anger has been building inside the people, it has been bubbling away for the past 3 years and I think this will finally blow the lid, the government have got this one seriously wrong!!!!.....the sooner they realise this the better for themselves and us!


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 15,858 ✭✭✭✭paddy147


    To DV Power and his pathetic carry on at desperately trying to scare people.........


    How do the solicitors of "New Beginning" work then,when they are represnting people in court,who are having their house taken back by a bank??

    They work for free (no cost to their client).

    Theres also FLAC too.





    You really are a clueless idiot.:rolleyes::rolleyes:


    And the more you post here,the more and more you show it too.

    mod: banned.


  • Registered Users Posts: 155 ✭✭leedslad


    paddy147 wrote: »
    How do the solicitors of "New Beginning" work then,when they are represnting people in court,who are having their house taken back by a bank??

    They work for free (no cost to their client).

    Theres also FLAC too.



    You really are an idiot.:rolleyes::rolleyes:

    And the more you post here,the more and more you show it too.

    Have standards slipped that much on boards now that this kind of "post" is not moderated?
    Whether you agree with the poster or not is one thing, when you have to resort to this type of personal abuse,then i feel you're losing any credibility
    and with it the argument


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 15,858 ✭✭✭✭paddy147


    leedslad wrote: »
    Have standards slipped that much on boards now that this kind of "post" is not moderated?
    Whether you agree with the poster or not is one thing, when you have to resort to this type of personal abuse,then i feel you're losing any credibility
    and with it the argument


    Well its true.

    He hasnt a clue of the facts (post 5761 and many others).

    He makes lots of threatening household charge claims that he cant back up or prove.


    If you are going to make a claim then at least have the proof or have the homework done.

    Clearly DV Power has neither done,with his replies and posts..:rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,183 ✭✭✭dvpower


    Izzy Skint wrote: »
    If our useless politicians start bringing people to court over non payment of this immoral tax, then they will probably need to call the army onto the streets....make no mistake, since the bank guarantee was announced an anger has been building inside the people, it has been bubbling away for the past 3 years and I think this will finally blow the lid, the government have got this one seriously wrong!!!!.....the sooner they realise this the better for themselves and us!
    I think you're over egging the pudding here.

    There certainly is some anger out there, but also a realisation and a certain resignation that there are going to be more taxes and cuts to services over the next few years at least.

    There are some protests planned over the next few weeks where we'll be able to gauge this better, particulary the Ard Fheis protest. I'll wait and see.


  • Registered Users Posts: 155 ✭✭leedslad


    paddy147 wrote: »
    How do the solicitors of "New Beginning" work then,when they are represnting people in court,who are having their house taken back by a bank??

    They work for free (no cost to their client).

    I'ts something i've wondered about, but haven't got around to finding out.
    Could you please tell me how they get paid?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users Posts: 78 ✭✭L0ui5e


    Ghandee wrote: »
    I dont get this response?

    Its €8.33 a month too fcuking much!!!

    Were being charged a tax to live in a poxy house that (not through ordinary Joe Soaps fault) is worth prob half of what it was when we bought it, due to the completely wreckless behaviour of corrupt politicians and greedy bankers.

    This charge is for us to pay back the BILLIONS squandered by them, robbed by them, and mismanaged by them FFS!

    It doesnt matter two fiddlers farts the amount, its just the fact that we have to pay it in the first place!

    Oh yeah, its 100 this year (TO BEGIN WITH) what will it be next year if we let them away with slipping it under the door this year?

    Civil disobedience is the way forward, lets all stand together, tell FG and the greedy bankers to go fcuk themselves!

    Typical response from the 'ah sure it'll be grand brigade'!

    Fcuk em, Fcuk the lot of them!

    Absobleedinlutley..

    Last year when I was at my friend's in England she explained to me about their tax to the local corporation.. then she explained that this covers the water and bins. I would be totally OK with paying the €100 if we were getting services for our €100 and yes it is €100 too much regardless of whether you can afford it or not. It's basically paying rent to live in your OWN HOME>
    PRINCILPES PEOPLE!


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 52,807 ✭✭✭✭tayto lover


    Can anyone begin to envisage the anger that would be shown on the streets if a person was taken to court for non payment of the Household Charge while not one Banker has appeared yet for wrecking the entire economy ?
    They wouldn't have the balls to do that.
    Don't register, don't pay.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,422 ✭✭✭✭Bruthal


    greenpilot wrote: »
    Where To wrote: »
    I will pay and so will 90% of the people who say the won't.

    Armchair rebels surrender easily.

    Remember this classic?......oh, theres more, theres more!!

    What that poster was failing to realise was, an armchair rebellion is exactly, and all thats needed in this protest.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 15,858 ✭✭✭✭paddy147


    leedslad wrote: »
    I'ts something i've wondered about, but haven't got around to finding out.
    Could you please tell me how they get paid?


    You know what a phone or google is?

    Google it,or pick up a phone and ring them and ask them nicely,and they will tell you.



    http://www.newbeginning.ie/who-should-contact-us/



    "We encourage any homeowners coming before the Courts who face having their homes repossessed, yet have no legal representation, to contact us.

    Our advocacy grouping are working around the clock on a voluntary basis, they will not be paid for their time or support in representing these individuals.

    Have you been served with a writ claiming repossession of your home?

    New Beginning is calling for members of the public who are facing repossession proceedings and have no current representation, to contact us".


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,129 ✭✭✭Wild Bill


    Izzy Skint wrote: »
    make no mistake, since the bank guarantee was announced an anger has been building inside the people, it has been bubbling away for the past 3 years and I think this will finally blow the lid, the government have got this one seriously wrong!!!!.....the sooner they realise this the better for themselves and us!

    Yep - as they have no democratic mandate for paying the German bank's gambling debts this could blow! Especially when you read the naked threats being posted here by supporters of the Regime.

    When do we get to start stringing blueshirts, Stickies and their apologists from the lampposts?

    Pity we have to wait for the default! :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,183 ✭✭✭dvpower


    Wild Bill wrote: »
    When do we get to start stringing blueshirts, Stickies and their apologists from the lampposts?
    :eek:
    'fraid all you get to do is vote them out at the next election.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 16,391 ✭✭✭✭mikom


    Fine Gael 2011 Manifesto.
    The famous 5 point plan.
    And lookie here.......


    Funding Local Government: Fianna Fail’s proposal, now endorsed by the Labour Party, to introduce by 2014 an annual, recurring residential property tax on the family home is unfair. But as we tackle the fiscal crisis, we will have to cut central exchequer funding for local authorities, and we recognise that local authorities will have to find more sustainable sources of revenue appropriate to local circumstances. What will be viewed as fair in South Dublin might be viewed as unworkable in rural Clare.

    In this context, we will empower local authorities to put in place, following the 2014 local elections, fairer alternatives to Fianna Fail’s and Labour’s recurring annual tax on the family home. The options would include:
    No extra local taxes, forcing local authorities to close non-priority services and / or to deliver increased efficiencies;
    • Increased local user charges for waste etc.; or
    • The option of a local “site sale profits tax”. Such a tax would be levied on the profit made from the site value on the sale of a residence (sales proceeds, less cost indexed by inflation, less stamp duty paid and less home improvements)

    The final measure might be considered as both fairer and more economically sensible than an annual recurring property tax. Whichever option local electorates choose, for the first time since the 1970s local government will have real independence from central government in deciding what services to provide at local level and how to fund them.

    http://www.finegael2011.com/pdf/Fine%20Gael%20Manifesto%20low-res.pdf


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 15,858 ✭✭✭✭paddy147


    With regards any remote and desperate ploys by FG of courts any legal matters,theres also FLAC

    Free Legal Advice Centre.


    (waits for all the Enda Fans here to deny this too).


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,129 ✭✭✭Wild Bill


    dvpower wrote: »
    :eek:
    'fraid all you get to do is vote them out at the next election.

    No point. As we've seen last year you vote against a policy and get it anyway.

    I'm thinking lampposts! :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,422 ✭✭✭✭Bruthal


    Wild Bill wrote: »
    No point. As we've seen last year you vote against a policy and get it anyway.

    I'm thinking lampposts! :D

    I can rig up an electric chair instead if you like, as long as my name is not on the esb bill for running it. They might think i own it then....


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 21,673 ✭✭✭✭dxhound2005


    paddy147 wrote: »
    You know what a phone or google is?

    Google it,or pick up a phone and ring them and ask them nicely,and they will tell you.



    http://www.newbeginning.ie/who-should-contact-us/



    "We encourage any homeowners coming before the Courts who face having their homes repossessed, yet have no legal representation, to contact us.

    Our advocacy grouping are working around the clock on a voluntary basis, they will not be paid for their time or support in representing these individuals.

    Have you been served with a writ claiming repossession of your home?

    New Beginning is calling for members of the public who are facing repossession proceedings and have no current representation, to contact us".

    It doesn't say anything there about representing people who break the new law.


  • Moderators, Music Moderators Posts: 35,945 Mod ✭✭✭✭dr.bollocko


    Paddy147 banned.
    leedslad wrote: »
    Have standards slipped that much on boards now that this kind of "post" is not moderated?
    Whether you agree with the poster or not is one thing, when you have to resort to this type of personal abuse,then i feel you're losing any credibility
    and with it the argument


    Complains about standards.

    Doesn't report the post.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,129 ✭✭✭Wild Bill


    paddy147 wrote: »
    With regards any remote and desperate ploys by FG of courts any legal matters,theres also FLAC

    Free Legal Advice Centre.


    (waits for all the Enda Fans here to deny this too).

    The irony here is that those who can easily afford to pay are also those who can afford to refuse to pay.

    The tactic of the Regime is to threaten and scare the vulnerable; but it won't work - you can't attack a million households when you have absolutely no democratic mandate.

    I'm thinking Ghadaffi's fate might suit Enda - the video would be a hit on youtube and bring pleasure to millions :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 304 ✭✭Izzy Skint


    while we are at it we should all refuse to pay tv licence....not a joke, i am serious, what will they do, take over 1 million householders to court?...
    a number of years back rte went crying cap in hand to government claiming there had not been a rise in tv licenece for so many years...and the government slapped €40 approx. onto the cost (if my memory is correct)

    the tv licence should be no more than €10 per year!!!....168 euro a year to rte....for what ?....time to cut the apron strings i think, let them sink or swim...
    .....a TEN year driving licence costs €25, a ten year passport costs €80 / €110, BUT!!! a ten year tv licence costs €1,680 !!....but I can see why...it's obvious.... a driving licence only permits you to drive a 1 ton vehicle on public roads with all the responsibility that goes with that.... a passport is probably THE most important document an individual will ever posess so enough said....and finally a ten year €1,680 tv licence gives us peace of mind while sitting on our @rses, in our own homes, for as long we like watching a group of public servants on a box wasting our tv licence money!!!!!......makes perfect sense......what a great country we have!!!!!


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,422 ✭✭✭✭Bruthal


    Izzy Skint wrote: »
    while we are at it we should all refuse to pay tv licence....not a joke, i am serious, what will they do, take over 1 million householders to court?...
    a number of years back rte went crying cap in hand to government claiming there had not been a rise in tv licenece for so many years...and the government slapped €40 approx. onto the cost (if my memory is correct)

    Thats right, i think it jumped from €100 to €150 in a single increase, and we put up with it as usual.


  • Registered Users Posts: 1,583 ✭✭✭mconigol


    Wild Bill wrote: »
    The irony here is that those who can easily afford to pay are also those who can afford to refuse to pay.

    The tactic of the Regime is to threaten and scare the vulnerable; but it won't work - you can't attack a million households when you have absolutely no democratic mandate.

    I'm thinking Ghadaffi's fate might suit Enda - the video would be a hit on youtube and bring pleasure to millions :D

    That kind of rhetoric does nothing for your cause btw. Totally un-necessary


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,129 ✭✭✭Wild Bill


    mconigol wrote: »
    That kind of rhetoric does nothing for your cause btw. Totally un-necessary

    My "cause" needs no enhancement - 1.5 million householders can't be wrong. ;)

    Usurping democracy is surely a crime?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,787 ✭✭✭xflyer


    My Mother is 86 years old. She lives alone in her house which she paid for over the last God knows how many years. She has no internet, doesn't really read the the papers and doesn't always understand the news. She is not exempt from paying the household charge. She depends on a widows pension and what my family gives her.

    Imagine for one minute that she is prosecuted for not paying the charge. Imagine for one minute the storm of publicity that would generate. Imagine how many people like her are out there.

    This is the reality that the likes of FG/Labour and DVpower fail to realise.

    My family and me are straight up and down law abiding citizens. We pay our taxes and do the right thing. Same with my wife's family. But on this we're unanimous. We're not paying.

    For the first time in my life, I'm standing up for something that could result in me getting a record. Not before time, I think.

    But in truth I'm not worried. The weight of public opinion is against this. Furthermore the fiscal treaty referendum will be defeated. FF may caused all this but FG and Labour are confounding the whole thing. We all may hate Ahern and Cowen but Kenny is a rat's arse away from being the most hated man in Irish history. Are you listening DVpower?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,422 ✭✭✭✭Bruthal


    Izzy Skint wrote: »
    while we are at it we should all refuse to pay tv licence....not a joke, i am serious, what will they do, take over 1 million householders to court?...
    a number of years back rte went crying cap in hand to government claiming there had not been a rise in tv licenece for so many years...and the government slapped €40 approx. onto the cost (if my memory is correct)

    the tv licence should be no more than €10 per year!!!....168 euro a year to rte....for what ?....time to cut the apron strings i think, let them sink or swim...
    .....a TEN year driving licence costs €25, a ten year passport costs €80 / €110, BUT!!! a ten year tv licence costs €1,680 !!....but I can see why...it's obvious.... a driving licence only permits you to drive a 1 ton vehicle on public roads with all the responsibility that goes with that.... a passport is probably THE most important document an individual will ever posess so enough said....and finally a ten year €1,680 tv licence gives us peace of mind while sitting on our @rses, in our own homes, for as long we like watching a group of public servants on a box wasting our tv licence money!!!!!......makes perfect sense......what a great country we have!!!!!

    Just like they are trying to do with the property tax, the government has fooled people for years, into believing a tv licence is actually a licence for a tv.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,129 ✭✭✭Wild Bill


    robbie7730 wrote: »
    fooled people for years, into believing a tv licence is actually a licence for a tv.

    We now know it's actually a contribution to Labour Party funds! :D


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,183 ✭✭✭dvpower


    xflyer wrote: »
    The weight of public opinion is against this.
    The polls don't indicate this.
    xflyer wrote: »
    Furthermore the fiscal treaty referendum will be defeated.
    The polls don't indicate this either.

    tbh, I don't see them targetting pensioners for court enforcement. That would be a stupid tactic. Maybe start with people who live in the leafy burbs in large houses and good jobs.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,653 ✭✭✭Ghandee


    Izzy Skint wrote: »
    while we are at it we should all refuse to pay tv licence....not a joke, i am serious, what will they do, take over 1 million householders to court?...
    a number of years back rte went crying cap in hand to government claiming there had not been a rise in tv licenece for so many years...and the government slapped €40 approx. onto the cost (if my memory is correct)

    the tv licence should be no more than €10 per year!!!....168 euro a year to rte....for what ?....time to cut the apron strings i think, let them sink or swim...
    .....a TEN year driving licence costs €25, a ten year passport costs €80 / €110, BUT!!! a ten year tv licence costs €1,680 !!....but I can see why...it's obvious.... a driving licence only permits you to drive a 1 ton vehicle on public roads with all the responsibility that goes with that.... a passport is probably THE most important document an individual will ever posess so enough said....and finally a ten year €1,680 tv licence gives us peace of mind while sitting on our @rses, in our own homes, for as long we like watching a group of public servants on a box wasting our tv licence money!!!!!......makes perfect sense......what a great country we have!!!!!

    Duly noted! ^

    And, I think we should all be emailing our electricity (any other utility bill company) suppliers, and remind them, that they have competitors who would be glad of our business should they be foolish enough to pass on our personal details to the Govt, or anyone else who should come asking for them!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,129 ✭✭✭Wild Bill


    dvpower wrote: »
    Maybe start with people who live in the leafy burbs in large houses and good jobs.

    Bring it on!

    The very folk who can afford to contest it, delay, challenge and thus contribute to the failure of the "pay the German bankers' debt" scam :)


  • Registered Users Posts: 155 ✭✭leedslad


    paddy147 wrote: »
    You know what a phone or google is?

    Google it,or pick up a phone and ring them and ask them nicely,and they will tell you.



    http://www.newbeginning.ie/who-should-contact-us/



    "We encourage any homeowners coming before the Courts who face having their homes repossessed, yet have no legal representation, to contact us.

    Our advocacy grouping are working around the clock on a voluntary basis, they will not be paid for their time or support in representing these individuals.

    Have you been served with a writ claiming repossession of your home?

    New Beginning is calling for members of the public who are facing repossession proceedings and have no current representation, to contact us".

    Thanks for the link Paddy, That's kind of you,and very considerate of those solicitors to work for free


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 9,183 ✭✭✭dvpower


    Wild Bill wrote: »
    Bring it on!

    The very folk who can afford to contest it, delay, challenge and thus contribute to the failure of the "pay the German bankers' debt" scam :)
    And pay the state's large legal costs when they lose. That'll be the end of the campaign - when someone fights it and gets hit with a massive legal bill.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,787 ✭✭✭xflyer


    dvpower wrote: »
    The polls don't indicate this.

    The polls don't indicate this either.

    tbh, I don't see them targetting pensioners for court enforcement. That would be a stupid tactic. Maybe start with people who live in the leafy burbs in large houses and good jobs.

    You would say that, but of course you could be right. If the government scare tactics work as they did before we would all vote to have our balls cut off for the good of Germany! Because that's what this is about and we all know it.

    Why not target pensioners, after all they've been targetted already while the people in leafy burbs get away with it. My Mother's pension has already been cut to the tune of three Euro, feisty woman that she is, she rang to complain but was fobbed off by the usual government apparachik whose fat pension has been barely touched.

    Let's face it neither the people in the leafy burbs or the pensioners will be hit because it's glaringly obvious that the government has no guts whatsoever and they've completely misjudged the public mood.


  • Registered Users Posts: 182 ✭✭twistyj


    If a pint was €20....

    20 Benson and Hedges were €50...

    Sure You'd complain about it,

    but i bet everyone would still pay it.

    Everyone incl. the nay sayers will pay the household charge.

    We are the Irish, the doormat of Europe.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,129 ✭✭✭Wild Bill


    dvpower wrote: »
    And pay the state's large legal costs when they lose. That'll be the end of the campaign - when someone fights it and gets hit with a massive legal bill.

    Nah. This will end with those lampposts :D


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,787 ✭✭✭xflyer


    but i bet everyone would still pay it.

    Everyone incl. the nay sayers will pay the household charge.

    We are the Irish, the doormat of Europe.
    I'll take that bet, I won't pay it and neither will any of my family.

    As for Ireland being the doormat of Europe, yes completely agree. We are. When we stand up up and say no more. We'll get more respect. The British and it pays me to say it would never have put with this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 13,380 ✭✭✭✭Snake Plisken


    So if you don't pay before the 31st whats the late penalty?


  • Advertisement
This discussion has been closed.
Advertisement