Advertisement
Help Keep Boards Alive. Support us by going ad free today. See here: https://subscriptions.boards.ie/.
https://www.boards.ie/group/1878-subscribers-forum

Private Group for paid up members of Boards.ie. Join the club.
Hi all, please see this major site announcement: https://www.boards.ie/discussion/2058427594/boards-ie-2026

Christians been driven out of the middle east?

1356710

Comments

  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,479 ✭✭✭✭philologos


    Well, there must be, if you'd like to see Egypt as an Islamic country.

    I presume you're going to argue that Egypt is a secular country?
    Oh really? Because I forgot to read over the past 80 years of Irish history.

    Yes, really. Hence why I said a truly Christian country. Ireland's history has shown us how much of society wasn't based on Christianity, but rather feigned to be. This is presumably best kept for another discussion.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    philologos wrote: »
    I've not much interest in debating the facts with you Killer Pigeon. I can't imagine Muslims being widely persecuted for their religious beliefs in an Islamic society .................

    ...what do you thinks going on in Bahrain? Rangers vs Celtic?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Do you know for certain that they are targeting Christians, specifically? Or is that just based on spin?


    ...based on what they're doing and on state TV sending out a 'call to arms'. Why, one might debate, but they are indeed doing so.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,479 ✭✭✭✭philologos


    Nodin wrote: »
    ...what do you thinks going on in Bahrain? Rangers vs Celtic?

    Much the same actually, except on a sectarian level which is also deeply futile. In Egypt that isn't an issue given that the vast majority are Sunni.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,621 ✭✭✭Jaafa


    There was a much larger protest on the 7th October in Tahrir square to do with people opposing the re-enactment of Emergency law. Funnily enough, there were no deaths that I heard of. In a much smaller protest yesterday organised by Christians there were 35 killed and 300 injured (And counting).

    Must be luck of the draw I guess.

    800 people died kicking out Mubarak. I doubt all of them were Christian. The security apparatus will target anyone it sees as a threat regardless of religion. If Christians are been attacked at the moment its just because they are the current 'threat' to the regime. Tomorrow it will be Shias, next week extremist Sunnis and so on and so forth

    Mentioning of the religions of these people is an attempt by both sides to garner support for their causes.

    Now this is relation to the 'official security apparatus'.However A lot of these attacks are by civilians against civilians. And again you'll find other motives behind the attacks (for example one of the first such attacks after Mubarak went was due to a marriage disagreement). Once more both sides cried 'muslims are attacking us' or 'Christians are attacking us' to gain support for their own petty revenge needs.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,479 ✭✭✭✭philologos


    ^^ I think the point is that not much has changed since Mubarak from the perspective of the Coptic Christians. It has come as much from the Egyptian civilians over the years if not more so than it has come from the State.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,992 ✭✭✭✭partyatmygaff


    Nodin wrote: »
    ...based on what they're doing and on state TV sending out a 'call to arms'. Why, one might debate, but they are indeed doing so.
    Not only that but the state TV released BS reports that the protestors killed members of the military which they later retracted blaming it on reporter error.

    Unfortunately, their plan seems to have worked. International media based their initial reports on the State television service's report of protestors being armed and fighting with the military. Most international news agencies don't seem to have bothered editing their reports to reflect the fact that Egyptian State TV (Which is more than likely controlled by the military) lied about the army deaths and protestors being armed.
    Jaafa wrote: »
    800 people died kicking out Mubarak. I doubt all of them were Christian. The security apparatus will target anyone it sees as a threat regardless of religion. If Christians are been attacked at the moment its just because they are the current 'threat' to the regime. Tomorrow it will be Shias, next week extremist Sunnis and so on and so forth

    Mentioning of the religions of these people is an attempt by both sides to garner support for their causes.
    Coptic Christians have been harassed, attacked and killed in Egypt decades before the so called "revolution". None of this is new.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,008 ✭✭✭not yet


    >>>> Christianity Forum

    As long as it eventually leads to the total annihilation of all religions, I couldn't give a damn.

    NICE....


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,621 ✭✭✭Jaafa


    Not only that but the state TV released BS reports that the protestors killed members of the military which they later retracted blaming it on reporter error.

    Unfortunately, their plan seems to have worked. International media based their initial reports on the State television service's report of protestors being armed and fighting with the military. Most international news agencies don't seem to have bothered editing their reports to reflect the fact that Egyptian State TV (Which is more than likely controlled by the military) lied about the army deaths and protestors being armed.


    Coptic Christians have been harassed, attacked and killed in Egypt decades before the so called "revolution". None of this is new.

    Again however I would argue that in a lot of these cases (not all) there have been underlining motives.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,992 ✭✭✭✭partyatmygaff


    Jaafa wrote: »
    Again however I would argue that in a lot of these cases (not all) there have been underlining motives.
    Underlining motives... such as? Other than anti-Christian zealotry, what other motives are there?

    Ignoring the hundreds, possibly thousands of incidents that have occurred in the past few decades let's just focus on last weekend's two protests.

    There was the general protest attended by Christians and Muslims on Friday to oppose Emergency Law. No deaths nor even injuries from what i've heard despite a lack of Emergency law being a huge threat to the power of the military and the authorities.

    Then there was the protest yesterday organised by Christians to protest against the leniency of the authorities against the people who've been attacking Churches and Christians since the initial protests in February. They weren't asking for the military or the authorities to curtail their power or change the law in any way. They were simply asking for the government to do their damn job and prosecute the people who attacked and continue to attack them. When you consider the number of deaths and other casualties in yesterday's protest compared to the lack of casualties from Friday's protest it really says it all about their plight.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,370 ✭✭✭✭Son Of A Vidic


    I really doubts it's as bad as Skynews is reporting.

    Nothing is ever as bad as Sky New reports.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 46,938 ✭✭✭✭Nodin


    Nothing is ever as bad as Sky New reports.

    Nothing is ever exactly as Sky News "reports". If they called it "The Sun" I'd object to it less.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 3,015 ✭✭✭Paddy Samurai


    Nothing is ever as bad as Sky New reports.

    What about the Guardian....
    At the back of their minds, the Christian hierarchies are aware of the devastation of the Iraqi Christian community after the fall of Saddam, when over half the Christian population – some 400,000 people – were forced to leave the country in a wave of Islamist pogroms. The Arab spring, it is widely feared, could yet mark the onset of the final Christian winter for the forgotten faithful of the Middle East. Only elections and the advent of sympathetic and stable democratic governments across the region is likely to allay such fears. Sadly, at the moment this outcome seems less likely with every passing day

    http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2011/oct/10/egypt-christian-protest-coptic-minority

    or Reuters............
    Egypt's Coptic Christians turned their fury against the army on Monday after at least 25 people were killed when troops broke up a protest, deepening public doubts about the military's ability to steer the country peacefully toward democracy.

    In the worst violence since Hosni Mubarak was ousted, armored vehicles sped into a crowd late on Sunday to crack down on a protest near Cairo's state television.

    Online videos showed mangled bodies. Activists said some people were crushed by wheels.

    Tension between Muslims and minority Coptic Christians has simmered for years but has worsened since the anti-Mubarak revolt, which gave freer rein to Salafist and other strict Islamist groups that the former president had repressed.

    http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/10/10/us-egypt-copts-clashes-idUSTRE7981Q220111010


    or New York Times..............

    The military and riot police, on the other hand, appeared at some points to be working in tandem with Muslims who were lashing out at the Copts. As security forces cleared the streets around 10 p.m., police officers in riot gear marched back and forth through the streets of downtown alongside a swarm of hundreds of men armed with clubs and stones chanting, “The people want to bring down the Christians,” and, later, “Islamic, Islamic.”

    http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/11/world/middleeast/coptics-criticize-egypt-government-over-killings.html?_r=1&hp

    Some muslims did try to help their Christian neighbours....
    When the clashes broke out, some Muslims ran into the streets to help defend the Copts against the police, while others said they had come out to help the army quell the protests in the name of stability.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,621 ✭✭✭Jaafa


    Underlining motives... such as? Other than anti-Christian zealotry, what other motives are there?

    Ignoring the hundreds, possibly thousands of incidents that have occurred in the past few decades let's just focus on last weekend's two protests.

    There was the general protest attended by Christians and Muslims on Friday to oppose Emergency Law. No deaths nor even injuries from what i've heard despite a lack of Emergency law being a huge threat to the power of the military and the authorities.

    Then there was the protest yesterday organised by Christians to protest against the leniency of the authorities against the people who've been attacking Churches and Christians since the initial protests in February. They weren't asking for the military or the authorities to curtail their power or change the law in any way. They were simply asking for the government to do their damn job and prosecute the people who attacked and continue to attack them. When you consider the number of deaths and other casualties in yesterday's protest compared to the lack of casualties from Friday's protest it really says it all about their plight.

    Again you missing the point. The regime has targeted both Muslims and Christians before. Your using one protest of neither side being attacked as proof. You know full well both sides have been attacked. There is no reason to believe the military targets Christian EXCLUSIVELY.

    That said of course it doesn't justify any of what their doing.

    As for the underlining motives I already gave an example in my first post. Please read it again before replying. If you like I can find a link for you.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 43,305 ✭✭✭✭K-9


    philologos wrote: »
    Ireland's history has shown us how much of society wasn't based on Christianity, but rather feigned to be. This is presumably best kept for another discussion.

    Don't really get involved in these threads but that's bullsh*t of the highest order. The Vatican's recent role or rather, non role, in investigations into our history eg.

    Mad Men's Don Draper : What you call love was invented by guys like me, to sell nylons.



  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,992 ✭✭✭✭partyatmygaff


    Jaafa wrote: »
    Again you missing the point. The regime has targeted both Muslims and Christians before. Your using one protest of neither side being attacked as proof. You know full well both sides have been attacked. There is no reason to believe the military targets Christian EXCLUSIVELY.
    The regime does not need to kill people to be complicit. The whole reason they're protesting is because the regime has been turning a blind eye to attacks made against Christians and Churches. They not only ignore attacks but members of the regime have often aided the attacks in the past.
    As for the underlining motives I already gave an example in my first post. Please read it again before replying. If you like I can find a link for you.
    I have no need for any links. I know exactly how it is over in Egypt. These "marriage disagreements" and other fabrications are just a ruse to hide the real purpose behind the attacks. As an aside, I do not recall ever hearing of a genuine attack by a Copt against a Muslim either in revenge or otherwise. If you knew what Egypt was actually like you'd know that something like that would be considered suicide.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 2,621 ✭✭✭Jaafa


    The regime does not need to kill people to be complicit. The whole reason they're protesting is because the regime has been turning a blind eye to attacks made against Christians and Churches. They not only ignore attacks but members of the regime have often aided the attacks in the past.


    I have no need for any links. I know exactly how it is over in Egypt. These "marriage disagreements" and other fabrications are just a ruse to hide the real purpose behind the attacks.

    And I'm not arguing with any of that first paragraph. All I'm saying is that they do the same thing to Muslims, Atheists, sufis etc.

    Well that's something neither can know for certain. You can't know if religion is the real reason with marriage as the excuse or the other way around. I believe it to be the other way around, you say otherwise.
    As an aside, I do not recall ever hearing of a genuine attack by a Copt against a Muslim either in revenge or otherwise. If you knew what Egypt was actually like you'd know that something like that would be considered suicide.

    Are you kidding? Don't you remember just after Mubarak was kicked out? There were reprisal attacks for at least a week between Muslims and Christians over the aforementioned 'marriage disagreement'. Also I do know a little something about Egypt but you don't need any indepth knowledge to know why Christians in general don't attack Muslims first. They are the minority. They're not stupid. If the situation was reversed however there's no reason they wouldn't take advantage of that just as some 'muslims' do now.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 13,992 ✭✭✭✭gurramok


    The state forces in Egypt have a notorious case of indiscriminate killing of protesters, remember their police vehicles running over people protesting during the Arab Spring?

    Maybe its down to poor training of army soldiers but when they(the army) get involved running people over(unlike during the Arab spring) it does raise questions of bias against a Copt demo. And the Copts as far as I know have been 2nd class citizens in that country.

    I wonder if its true as the media say that local Muslims joined both sides of the Copt demo, some against and some for. If some did, it may suggest that secularism amongst Muslims is still intact and they want a non-Islamic run society.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,992 ✭✭✭✭partyatmygaff


    Jaafa wrote: »
    And I'm not arguing with any of that first paragraph. All I'm saying is that they do the same thing to Muslims, Atheists, sufis etc.
    No they don't. When Muslim extremists were burning pictures of the Coptic Pope and hitting photos of him with shoes (A huge sign of disrespect in that part of the world) the police and military did absolutely nothing. When Muslims extremists were protesting against Christians wanting to rebuild a Church that extremists had just looted and demolished days earlier the police and military did absolutely nothing to them as well.

    In Egypt, when the military or the police attacks Muslims they just attack "people". I have never heard of them attacking or harassing a Muslim merely for the fact they are Muslim. That would be absurd in a Muslim majority country.
    Well that's something neither can know for certain. You can't know if religion is the real reason with marriage as the excuse or the other way around. I believe it to be the other way around, you say otherwise.
    I've lost count of the number of "Copt eloping with a Muslim girl followed by random acts of violence" stories that i've heard throughout the years. Considering they almost always sound the exact same i'm fairly certain that the vast majority are fabrications.
    Are you kidding? Don't you remember just after Mubarak was kicked out? There were reprisal attacks for at least a week between Muslims and Christians over the aforementioned 'marriage disagreement'.
    Actually, no I don't. The violence, by and large, originates from a single side. There's no point denying it when even Egyptian Muslims themselves (Albeit only the moderates) acknowledge the source of all the sectarian troubles.
    Also I do know a little something about Egypt
    Not to be blunt but a little something is just that... A little collection of vague stories and notions that don't really give you the full picture.
    but you don't need any indepth knowledge to know why Christians in general don't attack Muslims first. They are the minority. They're not stupid. If the situation was reversed however there's no reason they wouldn't take advantage of that just as some 'muslims' do now.
    There is absolutely nothing to suggest that Coptic Christians would "take advantage" (Read: Harass and kill others) of a hypothetical majority position. Suggesting on a whim that a group of people would willfully harass and kill people without any evidence to suggest the possibility is quite a bold statement.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 22,479 ✭✭✭✭philologos


    K-9 wrote: »
    Don't really get involved in these threads but that's bullsh*t of the highest order. The Vatican's recent role or rather, non role, in investigations into our history eg.

    It couldn't be any closer to the truth. There is nothing truly Christian about those events at all. There is absolutely nothing in the Gospel of Jesus Christ that would condone that behaviour.

    This is my point. I guess the difference between Irish society and British society on this so far is that one views Christianity == Roman Catholicism, the other views Christianity as a broad faith with many denominations. The Irish mindset when it hears Christianity automatically jumps to Rome. The British mindset will think of something broader irrespective of whether they are atheist / agnostic and so on.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,679 ✭✭✭Freddie59


    Dudess wrote: »
    'Twas irony - some folks around here have it in their imagination that not being anti muslim FUNDAMENTALIST/TERRORIST = defender of Sharia law... ;)

    Now, now D.;) I've corrected your statement.:cool:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,679 ✭✭✭Freddie59


    No they don't. When Muslim extremists were burning pictures of the Coptic Pope and hitting photos of him with shoes (A huge sign of disrespect in that part of the world) the police and military did absolutely nothing. When Muslims extremists were protesting against Christians wanting to rebuild a Church that extremists had just looted and demolished days earlier the police and military did absolutely nothing to them as well.

    And yet when cartoons are published here there is "outrage" (any excuse for a good ole Fatwah) by the extremist fundamentalists and their misguided Western "supporters".:rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,772 ✭✭✭Cú Giobach


    philologos wrote: »
    This is my point. I guess the difference between Irish society and British society on this so far is that one views Christianity == Roman Catholicism, the other views Christianity as a broad faith with many denominations. The Irish mindset when it hears Christianity automatically jumps to Rome. The British mindset will think of something broader irrespective of whether they are atheist / agnostic and so on.
    Bullshit.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 10,239 ✭✭✭✭KeithAFC


    Lets hope the Christians are safe. Sad to hear this.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,096 ✭✭✭conorhal


    Jaafa wrote: »
    Again you missing the point. The regime has targeted both Muslims and Christians before. Your using one protest of neither side being attacked as proof. You know full well both sides have been attacked. There is no reason to believe the military targets Christian EXCLUSIVELY.

    That said of course it doesn't justify any of what their doing.

    As for the underlining motives I already gave an example in my first post. Please read it again before replying. If you like I can find a link for you.

    think that you are missing the point.
    Muslims targeted by the regime were generally political activists like the Muslim Brotherhood, or others actively challenging the regime, they were targeted as individuals or groups on the basis of the challenge that they presented to Mubarak, not on the basis of their religion.
    Copts on the other hand have been the target of government discrimination for a long time for no reason greater then their religious identity.
    During the swine flu crisis for example, the government opted to slaughter every pig in the country, despite the fact that 'swine flu' was a misnomer and no cases were detected in the heard. But why pass up a chance to destroy the livelihood of members of a minority when such a golden opportunity presented to you on a plate? The tactics of the regime in relation to the fundamentalists was merely to 'outflank' the Muslim Brotherhood' by indulging the anti-Christian bigotry of the Muslim masses.

    There is constant low level harassment of the Christian community in Egypt, There is also daily discrimination in jobs and education, property ownership and most particularly in freedom of belief and worship. New churches are routinely destroyed or desecrated and it is next or near impossible to get planning permission to build a new one, (like the early Christians many have been reduced to worshipping in caves).
    It is very difficult for an Egyptian Muslim to convert to Christianity. The government will not recognize the change of religion on ID cards and makes it difficult for such people to leave the country. There are numerous stories of converted spouses being persecuted and even kidnapped.
    Generally, a blind eye is turned to violence against Christians in Egypt who must now live in fear of islamist violence to which there will clearly be no support from the organs of law and order.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,096 ✭✭✭conorhal


    >>>> Christianity Forum

    As long as it eventually leads to the total annihilation of all religions, I couldn't give a damn.

    Ahhh. 'liberal tolerance’ once more rears it’s ugly head as the Dawkensian Pol Pot's arrive on the boards....


  • Site Banned Posts: 2,037 ✭✭✭paddyandy


    lazygal wrote: »
    Also, it's BEING not BEEN. Christians aren't exempt from grammar rules, despite what your God might say.
    That's not grammer that's SPELLING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! NIT PICKER!!!!


  • Site Banned Posts: 2,037 ✭✭✭paddyandy


    popular versions of anything have little substance.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,940 ✭✭✭4leto


    I think they should be made stay in the middle east, I don't think I could handle any more Christians here.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 9,441 ✭✭✭old hippy


    conorhal wrote: »
    Ahhh. 'liberal tolerance’ once more rears it’s ugly head as the Dawkensian Pol Pot's arrive on the boards....

    You think Pol Pot was a liberal? Christ on a bike :rolleyes:


Advertisement
Advertisement