Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

Martin challenges Adams over IRA

24

Comments

  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,925 ✭✭✭aidan24326


    Glad to see Micheal Martin can stop the bleedin obvious - I am surprised to see he had the courage to say it though.

    Courage bedamned. When was the last time an Irish politician showed courage? Many others have accused Adams of IRA membership in the past, and in any case to say that he has strong links with that organisation is hardly news at this stage.

    No, this is about Martin looking to take a cheap shot and score some electoral points, nothing more. Because the polls are telling him that SF may well finish third in this election ahead of FF, and are in contention to take a number of FF seats. Don't be fooled that it's anything other than that.


    Sand wrote: »
    I think Gerry Adams activities in the 60s, 70s, 80s and 90s are fair game in a political discussion. Gerry likes to pretend he was off contemplating the mysteries of the universe in some windswept monastary perched on a rock off the coast of Ireland during that time.....

    Look we all know Adams background, and people can make up their own mind whether they'd vote for him or not given that background. But the issue here is that Martin is simply playing the election game, and his comments should be seen in that context. Look at this way, in a hypothetical world, if it was looking likely that FF and SF were going to form the next coalition government, do you think Martin would be taking such shots at Gerry Adams then?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,387 ✭✭✭✭DeVore


    They havent gone away you know...1 (Jerry McCabe's family that is).


    DeV.
    1.About the IRA. Adams was addressing a demonstration in Belfast in August 1995, when a member of crowd called out to him to "bring back the IRA". In an unscripted reply Adams made this remark.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,410 ✭✭✭sparkling sea


    aidan24326 wrote: »
    Courage bedamned. When was the last time an Irish politician showed courage? Many others have accused Adams of IRA membership in the past, and in any case to say that he has strong links with that organisation is hardly news at this stage.

    Courage was probably the wrong word.

    Lots of things in Ireland are hardly news, it was hardly news that Bertie was cunning and corrupt but that didn't stop us voting him and his party in 3 times, even in 2007.

    People need to hammer home exactly what Gerry Adams can negate in the name of politics, murder, robbery,etc.

    We need people not to let us forget what has happened to our country through illict practices by our government - the same theory should apply to Gerry Adams illict practices


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,262 ✭✭✭✭Joey the lips


    This tactic by fianna fail and indeed the other parties is going to continue. imo its simple you look at many areas of ireland and those doing all the work on the ground tend to join either labour or sinn fein. Why... Because they now thats who is doing the work.

    Whats astounding is Eamon gilmore and pat rabbit have never been interviewed by any paper on there past association with Official sinn fein who of course were official IRA and who eventually left the people of the Bogside to defend themselves thus spauning the foundation of the Provisionals.

    I heard a women on the radio say yesterday that gerry adams needs to "Prove" he was not in the IRA. i thought this sad. Rather than look at the work thats done in her community she is focusing on popularity. In otherwords the reason Bertie got in.

    ,Micael lowry when in Fine Gael was shown to have a shady and doddgy dealings. However his work on the ground will always see him elected and i applaud this.

    People are not focused on the issues in this election. If they were then fianna fail would actually not do so bad. People are focused on personality. Its the " I think he looks lovely" comment that really does my nut in they clearly have not learnt anything from charlies shirts.

    Its pure rubbish to suggest that Fianna fail can use a photo oppertunity for elections to have bertie in the fore of Gerry Adams and John Hume(Both socialist democratic) and then deny Gerry Adams has the right to run here which forming an allience with the SDLP. Its the "not in my back garden analogy"

    I have never voted on popularity. I have worked with the youth service for years. I vote for those who does there best to provide for this service. I vote for those who do the work.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    ,Micael lowry when in Fine Gael was shown to have a shady and doddgy dealings. However his work on the ground will always see him elected and i applaud this.
    And I despair about that attitude. So Lowry and his kind 'help' people get passports or medical cards or whatever, or pull strings for people to get stuff that they shouldn't. In return they receive a huge salary and expenses they could live off alone.

    Do you know how much Michael Lowry cost the state when he was handing out the mobile phone licences? What other dodgy dealings was he involved in to bilk the taxpayer out of money?

    Absolute disgrace, as are those people who vote for him and gombeen men like him.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 10,772 ✭✭✭✭maccored


    DeVore wrote: »
    They havent gone away you know...1 (Jerry McCabe's family that is).


    DeV.
    1.About the IRA. Adams was addressing a demonstration in Belfast in August 1995, when a member of crowd called out to him to "bring back the IRA". In an unscripted reply Adams made this remark.

    When he said that in 1995, the IRA hadn't gone away. They didnt officially go away for about another decade so therefore he was telling the truth.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,142 ✭✭✭ISAW


    But if Meehole Martin is so concerned SF, how come he doesn't do the same with Labour regarding the "Rusty Guns" otherwise known as Offical Sinn Fein with Gilmore, Rabbite, Kathleen Lynch and their 'fundraising' activites in the 70's and 80's and 90's, connections to Romania Communist dictator Ceausescu, counterfeit dollars and North Korea etc

    Regardless, all very, very rich coming from FF the party of the ol' brown paper bag :mad:

    Well this is the central issue! Martin got angry about Adams suggesting about corporate crime. Put it this way. Adams was in government in N Ireland. suppose Martin said "Northern Ireland has a problem with banks and criminals" ( referring to the Northern Bank Job and Republican connections) Adams might well have retorted talk of criminality in banking is very morally moral high ground when bankers under the current government got away with murder.

    Martin was only pointing out that Adams talking about criminals was rich coming from Adams' terrorist linked background.

    LordSutch wrote: »
    I am still very angry about 'That period' as you call it, the wounds are still there, and I wont forget what he stands for, or what Sinn Fein stands for, I remember well Mr Adams carrying too many IRA coffins (the coffins of his men) usually dispatched while on their way to plant Bombs, I will never forgive Adams for what he did (in his past life) Pre-94. I have absolutely no time for Sinn Fein or their supporters, and if they come knocking at my hall door during this election I will politely tell them to go away, (while I grit my teeth).

    Another central issue! It would appear the SF position is Adams was never active in the PIRA but did support them and knew people in the IRA. But Gilmore and others knew the same of OIRA linked people. We never hear much about that.

    tipptom wrote: »
    Martins ff dna comes from the time of other parties putting up posters of ff candidates as shadowy figures with the slogan of" keep out the gunmen" thats not that long ago so he cant be to pious about their own past,Adams should just ask martin about what percentage of ff builder supporters,ff councillers,ff td s,ff ministers,ff taosaighs have been under investigation in tribunels etc for corruption as compared to any other party in Ireland.

    considering around 2000 FF had over about half of the 1000 or so nationally elected TDs Senators and councillors and SF had 21 councillors and 1 TD (source: http://electionsireland.org/results/general/28dail.cfm)
    the ratio of FF to SF was 25 to 1 so for every SF councilor involved in a scandal you would have to have 25 FF people just to reach parity.

    Cant understand why any party does not come up with this figure because it would babecue Martin in a debate.
    By the way,not a SF supporter or voter but do have some sympathy as a clearly biased middle class media with well known political affiliations go for them so aggresivley compared to the carpet ride for other parties.

    I agree, especically to OIRA WP communist background of Labour compared to PIRA background of SF. FF also have an IRA background but took the path SF too in the 1990s back in 1927.
    KeithAFC wrote: »
    Sorry, there i was thinking we lived in 2011 and not 1922. Time for Gerry to come clean.

    I think Adams has said he was not in the IRA in the sense of involved in planning or carrying out IRA activities. It is a bit like the Minister of justice saying that he is not involved in Garda operational matters.
    johnmcdnl wrote: »
    me thinks FF are starting to get afraid that SF will overtake FF in the election leaving FF in 4th place ;)

    While they are both Republican FF are totally economically different to SF.

    FF votes are probably going to independents. I would have thought Labour were set to take up the working class FF vote but I think Labour have vacated this region leaving SF, new left and independents take up FF voters. I would never have thought FG would get FF votes but the surge in FG is so strong they must be getting some of the FF votes.
    seeing as SF/IRA decommissioned their arms and stopped fighting years ago FF are really starting to dig into the past to try to smear Adams

    Not so many years ago. Three or four. And people have still been killed since. FF would mainly agree with SF on REpublican issues just not in theior support of terrorism and intimidation and certainly not on marxist or leftie bananas economics.

    so if A SF person was to say something about economics or how to schieve a united Ireland a FF person would immediately be likely to be in that mode.
    - surely Micheal Martin could find something slightly more relevant such as SF's economic policies to target SF with...

    He could but Adams raised the issue of criminals {/b] in relation to bankers and linked it to FF. Martin was only retorting with "Gerry you are one to be referring to criminals?" much in they same way that someone might question a convicted pedophile critiquing FF policy on a moral issue.

    fair enough Adams probably has a bit of blood on his hands alright but without Adams role in the peace process the Provos might still be bombing away....

    True but how does his getting the IRA to stop give him moral authority to tell some other group how they should behave?
    Wasn't Adams also one of the main leaders within SF who started to try to make democratic steps to peace/freedom in the north

    Yes maybe. So what? How does his influencing the IRA to stop bombing give him moral authority to tell some other group how they should behave? I mean "I got the IRA to stop robbing them so listen to me when I tell you about banks and their policies" - isn't a very strong position is it?
    yes he's got flaws - but Michael Martin and FF are hardly in a position to cast stones are they...

    Which is exactly the point Martin was making with "you are one to lecture me on criminality"


    femur61 wrote: »
    MM rightly so is questioning Adams about his involvment in the IRA but not out belief he thinks the electorate deserve honesty, he just sees his party being seriously threatened by SF.

    See above. I don't think FF will be sucked dry by SF. What wold be of interest is to see FF run candidates up north.

    aidan24326 wrote: »
    Courage bedamned. When was the last time an Irish politician showed courage? Many others have accused Adams of IRA membership in the past, and in any case to say that he has strong links with that organisation is hardly news at this stage.

    But it is in relation to Gilmore and other Labour people in unions etc. I am referring to OIRA connections. Yet we hardly ever hear about that. I wonder why?


    , if it was looking likely that FF and SF were going to form the next coalition government, do you think Martin would be taking such shots at Gerry Adams then?

    Frankly? Yes I do.

    DeVore wrote: »
    They havent gone away you know...1 (Jerry McCabe's family that is).

    1.About the IRA. Adams was addressing a demonstration in Belfast in August 1995, when a member of crowd called out to him to "bring back the IRA". In an unscripted reply Adams made this remark.

    I remember the date. I got the impression he was appealing to the a tradition to vote for his lot. I would add that the IRA had reasons for being there namely
    1. fighting for a united Ireland with the consent of the Irish people
    2. policing areas where law and order had broken down

    The GFA ( in SF's view ) removed reason 1 but not reason 2 which will only re removed when SF get a say into running the police. so it is a valid comment.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,387 ✭✭✭✭DeVore


    I remember the date. I got the impression he was appealing to the a tradition to vote for his lot. I would add that the IRA had reasons for being there namely
    1. fighting for a united Ireland with the consent of the Irish people
    2. policing areas where law and order had broken down

    What consent?!

    When did the Irish people mandate the IRA to "fight" (read: bomb from a distance) for them??


    I was born there mate. Lagan Valley Hospital, 1970. They didnt police SH*T. My father, a catholic and a nationalist, had his car put on an IRA bomb list because he dared to house all families who were homeless in the local school, regardless of religion.


    You have no clue what went on up there. They are gangsters, criminals, pimps, drug dealers, protectionists and racketeers and they havent gone away you know.

    Gerry Adams protesting against criminality is like Monica Lewinsky, f*cking for virginity.

    DeV.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    DeVore wrote: »
    What consent?!

    When did the Irish people mandate the IRA to "fight" (read: bomb from a distance) for them??


    DeV.
    I seem to recall IRA support in the Republic in the 80s and certainly in the 90s was virtually nil. 'Revulsion' would be the word I would most closely associate with people's attitudes to their activities at the time.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,941 ✭✭✭caseyann


    I hope it backfires on the yellow bellied pathetic idiot.Poor sad attempts to big himself up out of fear of the growing popularity of Sinn Féin.
    Letter to Bertie back in 2005
    A Thaoisigh,

    I am writing to you to refute in the strongest possible terms the allegation you made that the Sinn Fein leadership had prior knowledge of the Northern Bank robbery and to express my deep concern at this ill-founded comment and the damage that it has caused to our working relationship and to the process. As you know I value and have acknowledged your significant contribution to the peace process. During the negotiations leading to the Good Friday Agreement in 1998 and in the years since you have played a leadership role in the collective endeavour of sustaining and pushing forward the peace process. Of course, there have been differences between us. That is the nature of a process like this. For your part the Irish government has been concerned at times over Sinn Féin’s attitude to issues. And in Sinn Fein’s view the Irish government has not always behaved as an equal partner in its dealings with the British government. But until recently both the government and the Sinn Féin leadership have not allowed these differences to upset the imperative and the primacy of the search for peace in our country.

    Your decision to attack Sinn Féin and your allegation that our leadership was aware in advance of the Northern Bank robbery has put a huge question mark over this. As you know Sinn Fein’s peace strategy is based in part on Irish nationalist and republican parties working with the Irish government to advance the peace process and its promise of fundamental constitutional and political change, of an all-Ireland framework and of equality and human rights for all citizens. You have acknowledged how Sinn Féin has worked closely with the Irish government to advance this agenda. Whatever political differences there are between the Sinn Féin leadership and the Irish government we have never misled you or acted in bad faith with you, your Ministers or government officials. Such an approach would be entirely contradictory and counter-productive. It would completely under mine our peace strategy - a strategy which Sinn Féin is totally committed to and have invested so much in.

    The Sinn Féin leadership, and Martin McGuinness and I had no prior knowledge of the Northern Bank robbery. When remarks attributed to you saying you thought we had such knowledge appeared in the print media last Friday I phoned Michael Collins and asked him to convey my concerns about this matter to you. I told him I did this more in disappointment than anger. I asked for a meeting with you, not least because I believed that if you had such concerns then they should have been put directly to us.
    The political fallout from the recrimination and accusations surrounding the bank robbery has clearly compounded the difficulties in the process following the DUP refusal to come on board in December. In addition to this your specific accusations against the Sinn Fein leadership are enormously damaging to the working relationship between us and are undermining efforts to try and secure the comprehensive deal, which we are all working towards. I am writing to you to ask that you address my concerns as a matter of urgency. I am still waiting for a response to our request for a meeting and the phone call to discuss these matters did not happen. These matters are too serious. They need to be dealt with as a matter of urgency.

    Bunch of chickens who kiss EU and bankers butts and each others,and pee all over the Irish people.
    Pity people werent so brainwashed and remember those whiter than white who are making the accusations lied for how long about the banking crisis and buried their heads in the sand.:rolleyes:
    And the attacks are feeble and nothing more than scaremongering and causing a imbalance in our country yet again.

    Any of those political parties who quip out accusations such as these in the middle of an election are nothing more than pathetic and sad.
    Not a single ounce of proof.Funny all those who constantly say proof links blah blah and so quick to jump on bandwagon because it suits them for their own agenda and prejudice now have no proof.Barr the words of politicians who lied to the whole country in favour of bankers and foreign investors over the good of the Irish people,the ones who watched the health service fall into disarray and watched people die and knew that Irish people were going to lose their jobs.And these are the people you are voting for and listening to?
    All these accusation based on this one thing( Bertie Ahern was convinced?????????????????????????????) He was the biggest liar of them all)

    In a joint statement this morning, Mr Adams and Mr McGuinness rejected accusations that they knew the robbery was going to take place.

    “We both absolutely rejected these unfounded allegations at the time and do so again today. We publicly and privately challenged Bertie Ahern to produce evidence to support his allegations. He didn’t. We told him they were groundless and untrue," it said. "It was and is our view that this had more to do with the electoral rivalries between Sinn Féin and Fianna Fáil".

    http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2010/1213/breaking13.html

    http://www.independent.ie/national-news/wikileaks-gerry-adams-denies-ira-and-bank-robbery-claims-2459019.html

    Gerry Adams has denied all allegations he was an IRA leader and denied he had any Knowledge of the bank robbery.
    And the Irish government said they had solid proof!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Where is the proof??????????????????????????????? Come on prove it!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Later Sinn Féin leader Gerry Adams would state that the operation was "not authorised by the Army Council, but authorised at a lower level by an authorised person".[4][8] Initially, the killing was denounced by the leadership of Sinn Féin, but later the party lobbied for the early release of McCabe's killers under the terms of the Belfast Agreement.[8] In 2005, the prisoners stated that they did not want their release "to be part of any further negotiations with the Irish government."[9]


    Seriously something wrong with that picture.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,142 ✭✭✭ISAW


    DeVore wrote: »
    What consent?!

    When did the Irish people mandate the IRA to "fight" (read: bomb from a distance) for them??


    DeV.

    SF ( and the current RIRA) people would view it that way. the Second Dail.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Second_D%C3%A1il#The_Second_D.C3.A1il_in_post-Treaty_Republican_tradition
    Within Irish republicanism there is a current of thought which argues that the Second Dáil continued to exist after the establishment of the Irish Free State. As the Second Dáil was the last Dáil to be democratically elected by all the people of Ireland rather than merely those within the newly partitioned 26-county state in the south, it is regarded by many Irish republicans to be the last legitimately elected Dáil. In December 1938, a group of seven people[4], who had been elected to the Second Dáil in 1921, met with the IRA Army Council under Seán Russell. At this meeting, the seven signed over what they believed was the authority of the Government of Dáil Éireann to the Army Council until such a time as a new Dáil could once again be democratically elected by all the people of Ireland in all 32 counties. Henceforth, the IRA Army Council perceived itself to be the legitimate government of the Irish Republic.

    Here is whow I would think about it:
    Given the GFA was assented to by the whole Island SF would think that this rescinds the Army Council. RIRA would differ in that the Unionist veto over the whole Island vote reinforces the Army council.


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,142 ✭✭✭ISAW


    DeVore wrote: »
    What consent?!

    I was born there mate.

    And Dev was born on route to the US. So what?
    You have no clue what went on up there. They are gangsters, criminals, pimps, drug dealers, protectionists and racketeers and they havent gone away you know.

    Yes. I made all these points in my post.
    Gerry Adams protesting against criminality is like Monica Lewinsky, f*cking for virginity.

    which I also indicated was Michael Martin's point when Adams criticised him on morality in banking!


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 7,142 ✭✭✭ISAW


    I seem to recall IRA support in the Republic in the 80s and certainly in the 90s was virtually nil. 'Revulsion' would be the word I would most closely associate with people's attitudes to their activities at the time.

    Indeed right up to the 1970s IRA support in the North was nil! Arther Griffith's SF in 1905 to 1916 was totally different from the SF of today. Labour represented the socialist/marxist aspect and the IRB were a fringe element. It was the British execution and imprisonment on leaders that spurred popular support for IRB/IRA. Similarly Civil rights were the popular movement and the treatment of them by unionists and British Army spurred them to support the IRA in the 1970s.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    caseyann wrote: »
    I hope it backfires on the yellow bellied pathetic idiot.Poor sad attempts to big himself up out of fear of the growing popularity of Sinn Féin.
    So, to summarise your post, Gerry Adams could not possibly have known about the Northern Bank robbery (and possibly IRA murders etc?) because Fianna Fail made a total balls of the economy and financial system?


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,941 ✭✭✭caseyann


    This crap is nothing more than trying to sway votes,so maybe Sinn Féin are doing better in the polls than the media is letting on.
    And they are the ones running scared :D
    http://www.herald.ie/national-news/adams-now-threatens-to-sue-us-over-his-ira-past-2542489.html

    For the first time, Adams has threatened to sue for defamation over claims of his IRA past.

    Adams has always denied allegations he was involved in Ms McConville's death. “I reject absolutely any accusation that I had any hand or part in the killing and disappearing of Jean McConville or in any of the other allegations that are being promoted,” he has said.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,941 ✭✭✭caseyann


    So, to summarise your post, Gerry Adams could not possibly have known about the Northern Bank robbery (and possibly IRA murders etc?) because Fianna Fail made a total balls of the economy and financial system?

    You know that is not what i am saying,and stop editing my post out to suit your own agenda ;)
    So try it on with someone else.
    Running scared perhaps i am right and Sinn Féin have more of a backing than you and others would like so start all this rubbish.
    Where is the proof why hasn't he been brought to court,why hasnt he been charged,why hasnt it been publicly printed this so called proof?
    Because there is none.

    I hope he does sue them and the family of jean Mc conville.
    I would imagine he didnt want to drag them through the courts so not to upset them anymore and not look like a scum bag for doing that to them.
    But by him not dragging them through the courts and proving himself innocent he is only giving them ammunition.
    He should sue them all bunch of wasters.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    caseyann wrote: »
    Adams has always denied allegations he was involved in Ms McConville's death. “I reject absolutely any accusation that I had any hand or part in the killing and disappearing of Jean McConville or in any of the other allegations that are being promoted,” he has said.
    He isn't in a position to threaten his old friend and IRA hero Brendan Hughes, who I believe stated publically that Adams ordered the death of Mrs. McConville.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    caseyann wrote: »
    Where is the proof why hasn't he been brought to court,why hasnt he been charged,why hasnt it been publicly printed this so called proof?
    Because there is none.
    Bertie Ahern has never been charged with anything either. Therefore Bertie Ahern is squeaky clean and never did anything wrong. :rolleyes:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 12,455 ✭✭✭✭Monty Burnz


    caseyann wrote: »
    He should sue them all bunch of wasters.
    You have a perverse sense of justice. Their mother was murdered by Adams and his buddies, so they are a bunch of wasters?

    An interesting insight into the Shinner mindset.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,941 ✭✭✭caseyann


    He isn't in a position to threaten his old friend and IRA hero Brendan Hughes, who I believe stated publically that Adams ordered the death of Mrs. McConville.

    Where did he publically say that? And you are going to take the word of someone who perhaps didnt want to make peace and was pissed off they did?Or the man who fought long and hard and saw it through?
    Let me think i pick the second.;)

    In 2000, he criticised the Sinn Féin leadership for allowing building firms in west Belfast to pay low wages to former prisoners and stated his belief that the republican leadership had sold out on their ideals in order to achieve peace in Northern Ireland.


  • Advertisement
  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,941 ✭✭✭caseyann


    You have a perverse sense of justice. Their mother was murdered by Adams and his buddies, so they are a bunch of wasters?

    An interesting insight into the Shinner mindset.

    The government are a bunch of wasters and the media.:rolleyes: And he should bring the mc convilles to court to prove their allegations untrue once and for all is what i said.

    P.S proof you have none so stop slandering his name.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 1,914 ✭✭✭danbohan


    He isn't in a position to threaten his old friend and IRA hero Brendan Hughes, who I believe stated publically that Adams ordered the death of Mrs. McConville.

    interesting to see unionists/ fianna failures/ using the words of a dead dissident republican to attack adams , ogh the irony


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,941 ✭✭✭caseyann


    Bertie Ahern has never been charged with anything either. Therefore Bertie Ahern is squeaky clean and never did anything wrong. :rolleyes:

    :rolleyes: your eyes at someone else.An he never will unless Sinn Féin get in there.Then they will start throwing the book at them and having them charged for all their sneaky underhanded dealings.As there is proof of that.Hardly any of the other parties going to chase it up.
    All these accusation and the government saying they have proof:rolleyes: i dont see any and they havent released an ounce of proof.I have a feeling rubbish lol


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,941 ✭✭✭caseyann


    danbohan wrote: »
    interesting to see unionists/ fianna failures/ using the words of a dead dissident republican to attack adams , ogh the irony

    Who also you might add wasnt in favour of Sinn Féin's political change for peace.:p


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 1,410 ✭✭✭sparkling sea


    caseyann wrote: »
    This crap is nothing more than trying to sway votes,so maybe Sinn Féin are doing better in the polls than the media is letting on.
    And they are the ones running scared :D
    http://www.herald.ie/national-news/adams-now-threatens-to-sue-us-over-his-ira-past-2542489.html

    For the first time, Adams has threatened to sue for defamation over claims of his IRA past.

    Adams has always denied allegations he was involved in Ms McConville's death. “I reject absolutely any accusation that I had any hand or part in the killing and disappearing of Jean McConville or in any of the other allegations that are being promoted,” he has said.

    Isn't every point made in an election made to try and sway votes?

    Any one can threaten to sue - hold this page.

    And yet it would appear people don't beleive him, I wonder why?

    Still if everyone holds him the esteem you do he will do very will in the elections, as will his party. Only time will tell


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,941 ✭✭✭caseyann


    Isn't every point made in an election made to try and sway votes?

    Any one can threaten to sue - hold this page.

    And yet it would appear people don't beleive him, I wonder why?

    Still if everyone holds him the esteem you do he will do very will in the elections, as will his party. Only time will tell


    Because people are so full of media hype and brain washed.Its like a girl who went out with this guy and she wouldnt sleep with him and because he doesnt like that ,he goes out and says to everyone else she is a whore.Then everyone starts calling her a whore.Doesnt make it true.So many different examples could be used to describe why people dont believe it.
    Another thing alot Irish have a thing for swallowing everything they hear rather than getting the proof first and then dealing with it.
    I remember once i was talking to a guy i know who is younger than me.The neighbour saw me talking to him and told everyone where i lived i was with him.Before i knew it i had people giving me dirty looks and whispering behind my back.Until i found out why.
    Twitching curtains mentality.
    Same thing.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 32,387 ✭✭✭✭DeVore


    My grandfather was Aide De Comp to Collins. He wouldn't have spat on the modern IRA if they were on fire.

    DeV.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,770 ✭✭✭Bottle_of_Smoke


    caseyann wrote: »
    Where did he publically say that? And you are going to take the word of someone who perhaps didnt want to make peace and was pissed off they did?Or the man who fought long and hard and saw it through?
    Let me think i pick the second.;)

    Maybe you should read a bit more about Brendan Hughes. He gave his all for the republican movement, even starved himself to within a week of death(have a feeling you'd take the word of Bobby Sands for some reason)

    He said he didn't want to see a return to war he just believed what Sinn Fein settled for didn't justify the death and destruction the IRA campaign caused.

    Brendan Hughes had no reason to lie.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,941 ✭✭✭caseyann


    Maybe you should read a bit more about Brendan Hughes. He gave his all for the republican movement, even starved himself to within a week of death(have a feeling you'd take the word of Bobby Sands for some reason)

    He said he didn't want to see a return to war he just believed what Sinn Fein settled for didn't justify the death and destruction the IRA campaign caused.

    Brendan Hughes had no reason to lie.

    Ah i see i shall take your word for it.
    I never said he didnt give his all for the republican movement.And might lead him to try get back at them for him giving up so much when they compromised and felt betrayed.
    No he said and its in quote.He didnt agree with Sinn Féin political changes to acquire peace.So therefore he wasnt for the route they took which brought about peace.
    I read enough and would never take away from any of them for what they did for what they believed,doest mean i am going to believe him because he said so.It is hear say.
    And why would i believe Bobby sands?
    If i was making this argument against you or any of the other anti SF group,you lot would be screaming proof links.
    So now i am saying,prove it, links, proof come on where is it?


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 245 ✭✭Hack12


    I am no supporter of Sinn Fein or any party and I have always voted for who I think is best to run the country at any time. I cannot support Sinn Fein as I dont agree with there policies but at the same time its a bit rich of FF going on about Adams IRA connection when basically they seem to forget the Arms Crisis and more or less handed them Ir£100K to buy arms


Advertisement