Advertisement
If you have a new account but are having problems posting or verifying your account, please email us on hello@boards.ie for help. Thanks :)
Hello all! Please ensure that you are posting a new thread or question in the appropriate forum. The Feedback forum is overwhelmed with questions that are having to be moved elsewhere. If you need help to verify your account contact hello@boards.ie

DART+ (DART Expansion)

12324262829394

Comments

  • Moderators, Motoring & Transport Moderators Posts: 14,109 Mod ✭✭✭✭monument


    Kennedy35 wrote: »
    I suggest you all read the E.I.S for the application for a Railway Order for the DART Underground. It will take quite some time despite your superior "educational and professional attainment". A visit to the Oral Hearing should also be helpful to you.
    I am not a member of any political party but am and always have been a resident of East Wall. Your derisory and childish remarks about Mary Lou McDonald and Joe Costello are quite in keeping with someone who displays a fundamental lack of knowledge of the project, as planned, and the negative impact it will have on our community.
    Arrogance and stupidity together is what has brought this country to our current situation. You display both in abundance.

    The comments on spelling and education are childish. And there's no real point at this stage attacking one or the other politicians as a number are supporting residents from different parties (FG, Labour, SF, independents, and FF too?).

    It looks like these is still a large problem in Ireland on consultation on large projects as well as smaller ones, but these is also the problem of a lot of people only being interested after projects develop and people paying no attention to open days etc. Environmental Impact Statements are not really a great way for the general public to read up on projects and most of the media only go into details after there are major problems or objections.

    It is clear that East Wall will be one of the most -- if not the most -- exposed areas to construction of the tunnel. But posters and other information with over the top claims don't help matters. Even if the aim is a valid one (ie to spike people's interest), misinformation or information with no source of context will not help residents.

    Hopefully the oral hearing can clear up any issues which lack clear information and, if the project is approved, An Bord Pleanala will set conditions which minimalism disruption and allows people to get on with their lives when/if ever construction starts.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 7,351 ✭✭✭Pete_Cavan


    Kennedy35 wrote: »
    I suggest you all read the E.I.S for the application for a Railway Order for the DART Underground. It will take quite some time despite your superior "educational and professional attainment". A visit to the Oral Hearing should also be helpful to you.
    I am not a member of any political party but am and always have been a resident of East Wall. Your derisory and childish remarks about Mary Lou McDonald and Joe Costello are quite in keeping with someone who displays a fundamental lack of knowledge of the project, as planned, and the negative impact it will have on our community.
    Arrogance and stupidity together is what has brought this country to our current situation. You display both in abundance.

    Militant NIMBYism also played a large part. You and other East Wall residents are displaying that in abundance and your politicians are latching onto that in order to get votes. They dont care that building DU is in the national interests, the only train MLM, Costello, etc. are interested in is the Dail Eireann gravy train for which they can buy a ticket at the expensive of the rest of the country as long as they appease East Wall residents.

    Of course there will be disruption, but that is unavoidable on a project on this scale. A few years disruption is a small price to pay for a piece of infrastructure that will benefit the area and the city (and by extension, the entire country) for the next 100 years.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 369 ✭✭Empire o de Sun


    I my opinion, it's about getting as much for east wall as possible out of dart underground. people see large projects as free money. the don't realise that they are at the end of the day paying for it as tax payers.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7 Kennedy35


    Your opinions don't matter when you are clearly uneducated and uninformed with regard to the DART Underground Project. An infrastructure project that serves only to replicate underground what currently exists overground will benefit who? Your opinions only serve to demonstrate that you have no knowledge of the Railway Order, EIS and have not attended the Oral hearing.
    To quote one opinion “people see large projects as free money”. It is an interesting observation in that it is most likely correct, when it pertains to the Contractors and Iarnrod Eireann. A point that could have been valid is unfortunately negated when it applied to a community. There is really only one response that can be made in this instance, to ignore your ignorant ranting. Perhaps if you educate yourselves, make a valid comment, it could be worthy of a response. Until then you are best ignored.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,818 ✭✭✭donvito99


    Kennedy35 wrote: »
    I suggest you all read the E.I.S for the application for a Railway Order for the DART Underground. It will take quite some time despite your superior "educational and professional attainment". A visit to the Oral Hearing should also be helpful to you.
    I am not a member of any political party but am and always have been a resident of East Wall. Your derisory and childish remarks about Mary Lou McDonald and Joe Costello are quite in keeping with someone who displays a fundamental lack of knowledge of the project, as planned, and the negative impact it will have on our community.
    Arrogance and stupidity together is what has brought this country to our current situation. You display both in abundance.

    When you are voting for a national assembly keep the city and countrys interests at heart also, and not just your own.

    This city will be around long after you or I are gone, its about time we took the leap for once and do something that may cause some inconvenience for a short period but will have long lasting social and economic benefits.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 5,818 ✭✭✭donvito99


    Kennedy35 wrote: »
    An infrastructure project that serves only to replicate underground what currently exists overground will benefit who?

    Fine then.

    Lets build it overground, right through east wall. Happy?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 426 ✭✭Jack Noble


    Kennedy35 wrote: »
    Your opinions don't matter when you are clearly uneducated and uninformed with regard to the DART Underground Project. An infrastructure project that serves only to replicate underground what currently exists overground will benefit who? Your opinions only serve to demonstrate that you have no knowledge of the Railway Order, EIS and have not attended the Oral hearing.
    To quote one opinion “people see large projects as free money”. It is an interesting observation in that it is most likely correct, when it pertains to the Contractors and Iarnrod Eireann. A point that could have been valid is unfortunately negated when it applied to a community. There is really only one response that can be made in this instance, to ignore your ignorant ranting. Perhaps if you educate yourselves, make a valid comment, it could be worthy of a response. Until then you are best ignored.

    What overground line does Dart Underground replicate?

    And if you say the Luas Red line you fundamentally misunderstand or clearly do not understand Dart Underground, its raison d'etre and the benefits it will bring to the city and the country.

    You bought a house beside one of the biggest rail yards in the country - did you really think it and the areas around it would never be developed?

    An east-west underground Dart line is not a new project - it has been on the drawing board since 1975 and was part of the original three-line Dart system abandoned in the 1980s.

    The current Dart Underground (Interconnector) from Docklands to Heuston has been planned since 1995 and was part of the DTO Platform for Change strategy published in 2001.

    Are you trying to tell us you missed all this when you bought a house near the CIE yards in Docklands? If you did, then it's your own bloody fault.

    Dart Underground will be built and the people of East Wall will not prevent it with their NIMBY whingeing.

    Of course, Irish Rail and its contractors should ensure disruption during construction is minimised but residents in no way should be allowed to prevent this project.

    But if you think a vote for the likes of Mary Lou McDonald or Joe Costello will prevent DartU going ahead, then you are incredibly naive.. Sinn Fein will be nowhere near government and party policy - as opposed to MLM's populist posturing in East Wall - is to build DartU and Metro North.

    Costello is a clown and will be nothing but a backbencher or at best junior minister in any FG-Labour govt. And his gombeen NIMBY stance on DartU and Metro North will ensure he will be nowhere near the Department of Transport as he will clearly have cREATED a major conflict of interest.

    DartU and Metro are critical to the future mid- to long-term economic and social development of Dublin and are supported by all the local authorities and state agencies responsible for economic development - and all the main political parties.

    Both may be delayed due to the current economic problems but they will be built or under construction by the end of the decade. The mistakes of the past with regard to the original Dart plan will not be repeated.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 4,858 ✭✭✭paulm17781


    Kennedy35 wrote: »
    An infrastructure project that serves only to replicate underground what currently exists overground will benefit who?

    Could you tell me what it replicates? I've done a good bit of research on it and it doesn't replicate anything that exists. Unless there is a train line through the city that I am unaware of.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 6,093 ✭✭✭Amtmann


    Kennedy35 wrote: »
    Arrogance and stupidity together is what has brought this country to our current situation. You display both in abundance.
    Kennedy35 wrote: »
    Your opinions don't matter when you are clearly uneducated and uninformed with regard to the DART Underground Project. An infrastructure project that serves only to replicate underground what currently exists overground will benefit who? Your opinions only serve to demonstrate that you have no knowledge of the Railway Order, EIS and have not attended the Oral hearing.
    To quote one opinion “people see large projects as free money”. It is an interesting observation in that it is most likely correct, when it pertains to the Contractors and Iarnrod Eireann. A point that could have been valid is unfortunately negated when it applied to a community. There is really only one response that can be made in this instance, to ignore your ignorant ranting. Perhaps if you educate yourselves, make a valid comment, it could be worthy of a response. Until then you are best ignored.

    Kennedy35, I have bolded the aspects of your posts that are unacceptable in this forum. You are a new poster so I will give you some leeway, but you are required to familiarise yourself with these rules before posting again.
    Heated debate is fine; but personalised insults made directly against other posters on this forum are not. Thanks.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 560 ✭✭✭Jehuty42


    Kennedy35 wrote: »
    An infrastructure project that serves only to replicate underground what currently exists overground will benefit who?
    Oh for god's sake, the Phoenix Park Tunnel is not equivalent to the DU in any way.


  • Advertisement
  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,129 ✭✭✭Wild Bill


    Lauder wrote: »
    Hardly surprising is it, given the educational and professional attainment of your typical SFer.

    Compared to....? You? A typical FGer? :mad:


  • Banned (with Prison Access) Posts: 3,129 ✭✭✭Wild Bill


    btw - I am 100% in favour of DU.

    But if political cheap-shots are allowed to pollute these threads you won't find me wanting. :cool:


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,032 ✭✭✭DWCommuter


    Jehuty42 wrote: »
    Oh for god's sake, the Phoenix Park Tunnel is not equivalent to the DU in any way.

    Thats only an assumption. He/she may not mean that route.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 523 ✭✭✭Lauder


    Kennedy35 wrote: »
    I suggest you all read the E.I.S for the application for a Railway Order for the DART Underground. It will take quite some time despite your superior "educational and professional attainment". A visit to the Oral Hearing should also be helpful to you.
    I am not a member of any political party but am and always have been a resident of East Wall. Your derisory and childish remarks about Mary Lou McDonald and Joe Costello are quite in keeping with someone who displays a fundamental lack of knowledge of the project, as planned, and the negative impact it will have on our community.
    Arrogance and stupidity together is what has brought this country to our current situation. You display both in abundance.

    My comments on the DU project are not that of 'arrogance'. They are the result of detailed analysis and research. I am fully aware of the details of the DU project (primarily due to the fact that I developed project specific hedonic price models for the East Wall and Inchicore areas).

    It is your comments are those that show arrogance 'in abundance' with your lack of awareness of the greater benefits to the East Wall area and indeed to the individual residents (both economically and socially).

    I think you sincerely need to revaluate your views of DU, and certainly think twice before issuing demeaning comments on my knowledge of the project.

    The level of short-sightedness and gombeenism shown by the East Wall resident group and the pathetic politicians (or non-politicans in Mary Lou's case) who latched on to their views, is a sad indicator of everything that is wrong with infrastructural developed in this state.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 369 ✭✭Empire o de Sun


    Kennedy35 wrote: »
    Your opinions don't matter when you are clearly uneducated and uninformed with regard to the DART Underground Project. An infrastructure project that serves only to replicate underground what currently exists overground will benefit who? Your opinions only serve to demonstrate that you have no knowledge of the Railway Order, EIS and have not attended the Oral hearing.
    To quote one opinion “people see large projects as free money”. It is an interesting observation in that it is most likely correct, when it pertains to the Contractors and Iarnrod Eireann. A point that could have been valid is unfortunately negated when it applied to a community. There is really only one response that can be made in this instance, to ignore your ignorant ranting. Perhaps if you educate yourselves, make a valid comment, it could be worthy of a response. Until then you are best ignored.

    Sorry, I am an uneducated North Sider who happens to have some experience in Engineering projects where people always look at them and say "whats in it for me"

    In my opinion it is a level of corruption that costs the state millions every year.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,221 ✭✭✭BrianD


    Kennedy35 wrote: »
    Your opinions don't matter when you are clearly uneducated and uninformed with regard to the DART Underground Project. An infrastructure project that serves only to replicate underground what currently exists overground will benefit who? Your opinions only serve to demonstrate that you have no knowledge of the Railway Order, EIS and have not attended the Oral hearing.
    To quote one opinion “people see large projects as free money”. It is an interesting observation in that it is most likely correct, when it pertains to the Contractors and Iarnrod Eireann. A point that could have been valid is unfortunately negated when it applied to a community. There is really only one response that can be made in this instance, to ignore your ignorant ranting. Perhaps if you educate yourselves, make a valid comment, it could be worthy of a response. Until then you are best ignored.

    Well off the mark here. DART Underground benefits more of Dublin and significantly more so that Metro North will.

    It links up existing rail infrastructure creating an integrated network out of existing lines and increasing capacity and service along these lines.

    In other cities, research and practice it's this integration that increases usage across the network.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 280 ✭✭coolperson05


    Evening all,

    Just a naive question, but in these cash strapped times, I wont why they wouldn't just combine DART underground and Metro North together into one project? Have the DART coming from Heuston as planned, to Stephens Green and have a 2nd (or what would be 3rd) line off it after Docklands and go underground to the Airport (and Swords). It would link almost directly to Heuston and the Airport which would be very appealing to travellers from Waterford, Cork, Galway, Limerick, Mayo and all in between.

    With Metro North alone, its fairly disconnected....I would have thought.

    Again, feel free to correct me! It just occurred to me there


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,032 ✭✭✭DWCommuter


    Evening all,

    Just a naive question, but in these cash strapped times, I wont why they wouldn't just combine DART underground and Metro North together into one project? Have the DART coming from Heuston as planned, to Stephens Green and have a 2nd (or what would be 3rd) line off it after Docklands and go underground to the Airport (and Swords). It would link almost directly to Heuston and the Airport which would be very appealing to travellers from Waterford, Cork, Galway, Limerick, Mayo and all in between.

    With Metro North alone, its fairly disconnected....I would have thought.

    Again, feel free to correct me! It just occurred to me there


    Lets no get into the technical aspects because the political ones are far better when discussing these matters. MN and DU are separate projects due to a combination of political dick swinging and a complete failure to deal with the dinosaur that is CIE. I'm only scratching the surface, so forgive me. The depth of this issue would make longer and more interesting reading.;)


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 560 ✭✭✭Jehuty42


    Speaking of which, any progress on that book I understand you intend to release?


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 9,432 ✭✭✭markpb


    With Metro North alone, its fairly disconnected....I would have thought.

    Where do people get this idea? It will join the Airport (which is now used as a BE intercharge), Luas Red Line, Luas Green line and the Dart (if DU is build). Luas BXD and F and Metro West would also have joined it if they were built.

    I'm not arguing for or against it, just against this idea that it's disconnected because it doesn't join Connolly or Heuston directly. Somehow, the Luas Green line manages to do very well even though it's *totally* disconnected.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 426 ✭✭Jack Noble


    markpb wrote: »
    Where do people get this idea? It will join the Airport (which is now used as a BE intercharge), Luas Red Line, Luas Green line and the Dart (if DU is build). Luas BXD and F and Metro West would also have joined it if they were built.

    I'm not arguing for or against it, just against this idea that it's disconnected because it doesn't join Connolly or Heuston directly. Somehow, the Luas Green line manages to do very well even though it's *totally* disconnected.

    Most of the critics of Metro North either do not understand it is part of a wider NETWORK providing an INTEGRATED TRANSPORT SYSTEM for Dublin or simply refuse to accept this reality - and insist on viewing it as a single, standalone line. Few have even looked at either the MN route map or the wider network map for T21.

    The same applies to Dart Underground to a lesser degree with people still insisting the Phoenix Park Tunnel and the Luas Red line do the same thing - connect Heuston and Connolly. And also to the various other Luas lines and Metro West. However, I would add that Metro North will be much less effective if DartU is not built as DartU is the spine of the entire system - without DartU, the rest of the lines simply cannot and will not fulfill their potential.

    I am blue in the face trying to explain this to people - many of whom simply won't listen because they have made up there minds based on what they have heard in the pub or on the radio or in Kevn Myers column or from a taxi driver. There is an abundance of detailed information on all these projects on the internet and elsewhere in the public domain if people really want to understand how Metro, Dart and Luas will benefit Dublin for decades into the future. But I fear most people simly couldn't be bothered looking for it.
    DWCommuter wrote: »
    Lets no get into the technical aspects because the political ones are far better when discussing these matters. MN and DU are separate projects due to a combination of political dick swinging and a complete failure to deal with the dinosaur that is CIE. I'm only scratching the surface, so forgive me. The depth of this issue would make longer and more interesting reading.wink.gif

    DWC

    It was explained to me in the late-90s during the Luas debates that once CIE had become fixated with on-street ligh-rail as the best system for Dublin and had support from like-minded senior civil servants. This view became gospel because weak and/or disinterested politicians simply accepted it and would not question the thinking behind LRT. Those who did question the wisdom of LRT were simply dismissed and/or discredited. We are still paying a high price for all that today and will be for decades to come.

    My own opinion is that if the original Dart plan had been resurrected in the mid-1990s and tweaked to give us the lines now in planning - Dart Underground (Docklands to Inchicore) and Metro North/Luas Green (Swords-Airport-City Centre-Bray along old Harcourt line) - there would have been less opposition and much more support for the plan. Also, at this stage, one would have hoped at least one would be operational and the other under construction. People are fixated on names without realising that essentially Metro and Dart do exactly the same thing - move people around the city very effectively and very efficiently. Only the silly politicking between CIE, govt and RPA gave us two systems with different gauges.

    However, unfortunately we are where we are (I really, really hate that phrase), and Metro North and Dart Underground are the only game in town at this stage and we need to get behind them to ensure they are built as soon as possible given the current economic circumstances.

    I would hope you would agree with me on that.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 7,221 ✭✭✭BrianD


    markpb wrote: »
    Where do people get this idea? It will join the Airport (which is now used as a BE intercharge), Luas Red Line, Luas Green line and the Dart (if DU is build). Luas BXD and F and Metro West would also have joined it if they were built.

    I'm not arguing for or against it, just against this idea that it's disconnected because it doesn't join Connolly or Heuston directly. Somehow, the Luas Green line manages to do very well even though it's *totally* disconnected.

    It's still an orphan line. Think of what it could have been. Of course it will have utility and usage like the Green and Red lines but it won't be maximised.

    Combine the DU and MN - that means you would have to get rid of the quango that is the RPA.

    Jack Noble - there's some good research out there on the LA metro and how building single lines weren't effective. Take a look at MN on an OS and you'll see the obvious problems and why it's a crock.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 426 ✭✭Jack Noble


    BrianD wrote: »
    It's still an orphan line. Think of what it could have been. Of course it will have utility and usage like the Green and Red lines but it won't be maximised.

    Combine the DU and MN - that means you would have to get rid of the quango that is the RPA.

    Jack Noble - there's some good research out there on the LA metro and how building single lines weren't effective. Take a look at MN on an OS and you'll see the obvious problems and why it's a crock.

    BrianD,

    I'm at a loss as to what you are saying.

    How is Metro "an orphan line" considering the level of integration with other existing and planned Luas, Metro and Dart lines? It will only be an orphan if the other lines are not built. As it stands today, no T21 project has been abandoned.

    All are in various stages of planning - delayed yes, abandoned no - and all will be built as and when funding becomes available. The Railway Orders have or will have a 10-year life span (15 years in the case of Metro West) so the decisions to build will lie with the next three or even four governments.

    Metro North and Dart Underground are separate projects by separate bodies - the result of bad decisions by govt - but together they and the Luas lines create a network which links all the main transport hubs, business, commercial, retail and government districts, tourism, leisure and entertainment sites, two sports stadia, two universities, several hospitals and countless residential areas - and the airport.

    There is no need to get rid of the RPA. Leave it to provide Metro and Luas lines while CIE should proceed with Dart. The two systems will still provide an integrated network. And may I point out that of the two organisations, the RPA has been the more successful of the two, has delivered two Luas lines and extensions and is far advanced with Metro North while Metro West and Luas BXD are at the same stage as Dart Underground - with Railway Order applications before An Bord Pleanala.

    Dart Underground has been delayed by CIE/IR inertia over the last decade and the decision to go back to the drawing board and completely redesign the original Interconnector project from the mid-1990s/early-2000s. That has allowed the govt to delay it further by omitting the "tunnel element" from the four-year budget planning to 2014.

    And why is Metro North "a crock"?

    What route would you suggest that takes in as many major trip generators and provides as much transport integration as Metro North does - Swords, Airport, Dardistown (Metro West) Ballymun, DCU, Drumcondra (Dart1), Mater, OCS (Luas Red and Green/BXD) and SSG (Dart2 and Luas Green)?

    Where do you suggest it should run? Much of it mirrors the original 1975 DRRTS (Dart) route from city centre to Ballymun - it has been simply updated with more stops to take into account development and growth of the northside of the city in the last four decades. That is exactly what has also been done with Dart Underground on the southside, BTW.

    Metro North will only fail to realise its potential only if Dart Underground is not built but when both are operational, both will be a success and will transform Dublin and the way people move around the city.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,032 ✭✭✭DWCommuter


    Jehuty42 wrote: »
    Speaking of which, any progress on that book I understand you intend to release?

    Delayed due to a legal issue. Can't say anymore unfortunately.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,032 ✭✭✭DWCommuter


    Jack Noble wrote: »
    Most of the critics of Metro North either do not understand it is part of a wider NETWORK providing an INTEGRATED TRANSPORT SYSTEM for Dublin or simply refuse to accept this reality - and insist on viewing it as a single, standalone line. Few have even looked at either the MN route map or the wider network map for T21.

    The same applies to Dart Underground to a lesser degree with people still insisting the Phoenix Park Tunnel and the Luas Red line do the same thing - connect Heuston and Connolly. And also to the various other Luas lines and Metro West. However, I would add that Metro North will be much less effective if DartU is not built as DartU is the spine of the entire system - without DartU, the rest of the lines simply cannot and will not fulfill their potential.

    I am blue in the face trying to explain this to people - many of whom simply won't listen because they have made up there minds based on what they have heard in the pub or on the radio or in Kevn Myers column or from a taxi driver. There is an abundance of detailed information on all these projects on the internet and elsewhere in the public domain if people really want to understand how Metro, Dart and Luas will benefit Dublin for decades into the future. But I fear most people simly couldn't be bothered looking for it.



    DWC

    It was explained to me in the late-90s during the Luas debates that once CIE had become fixated with on-street ligh-rail as the best system for Dublin and had support from like-minded senior civil servants. This view became gospel because weak and/or disinterested politicians simply accepted it and would not question the thinking behind LRT. Those who did question the wisdom of LRT were simply dismissed and/or discredited. We are still paying a high price for all that today and will be for decades to come.

    My own opinion is that if the original Dart plan had been resurrected in the mid-1990s and tweaked to give us the lines now in planning - Dart Underground (Docklands to Inchicore) and Metro North/Luas Green (Swords-Airport-City Centre-Bray along old Harcourt line) - there would have been less opposition and much more support for the plan. Also, at this stage, one would have hoped at least one would be operational and the other under construction. People are fixated on names without realising that essentially Metro and Dart do exactly the same thing - move people around the city very effectively and very efficiently. Only the silly politicking between CIE, govt and RPA gave us two systems with different gauges.

    However, unfortunately we are where we are (I really, really hate that phrase), and Metro North and Dart Underground are the only game in town at this stage and we need to get behind them to ensure they are built as soon as possible given the current economic circumstances.

    I would hope you would agree with me on that.

    I generally agree. However the LRT debacle that started in the early 90s was actually due to a timid CIE conditioned by unimaginative Governments who refused to consider bank rolling the DART project. If one looks at the original LRT proposal, its nearly identical to the original DART plan from the 70s. I don't think it was a fixation. I think it was a cheaper alternative to attract Government support.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 560 ✭✭✭Jehuty42


    DWCommuter wrote: »
    Delayed due to a legal issue. Can't say anymore unfortunately.
    Cool, best of luck with it, I'm sure it would be a great read.


  • Closed Accounts Posts: 3,032 ✭✭✭DWCommuter


    Jack Noble wrote: »
    BrianD,

    I'm at a loss as to what you are saying.

    How is Metro "an orphan line" considering the level of integration with other existing and planned Luas, Metro and Dart lines? It will only be an orphan if the other lines are not built. As it stands today, no T21 project has been abandoned.

    All are in various stages of planning - delayed yes, abandoned no - and all will be built as and when funding becomes available. The Railway Orders have or will have a 10-year life span (15 years in the case of Metro West) so the decisions to build will lie with the next three or even four governments.

    Metro North and Dart Underground are separate projects by separate bodies - the result of bad decisions by govt - but together they and the Luas lines create a network which links all the main transport hubs, business, commercial, retail and government districts, tourism, leisure and entertainment sites, two sports stadia, two universities, several hospitals and countless residential areas - and the airport.

    There is no need to get rid of the RPA. Leave it to provide Metro and Luas lines while CIE should proceed with Dart. The two systems will still provide an integrated network. And may I point out that of the two organisations, the RPA has been the more successful of the two, has delivered two Luas lines and extensions and is far advanced with Metro North while Metro West and Luas BXD are at the same stage as Dart Underground - with Railway Order applications before An Bord Pleanala.

    Dart Underground has been delayed by CIE/IR inertia over the last decade and the decision to go back to the drawing board and completely redesign the original Interconnector project from the mid-1990s/early-2000s. That has allowed the govt to delay it further by omitting the "tunnel element" from the four-year budget planning to 2014.

    And why is Metro North "a crock"?

    What route would you suggest that takes in as many major trip generators and provides as much transport integration as Metro North does - Swords, Airport, Dardistown (Metro West) Ballymun, DCU, Drumcondra (Dart1), Mater, OCS (Luas Red and Green/BXD) and SSG (Dart2 and Luas Green)?

    Where do you suggest it should run? Much of it mirrors the original 1975 DRRTS (Dart) route from city centre to Ballymun - it has been simply updated with more stops to take into account development and growth of the northside of the city in the last four decades. That is exactly what has also been done with Dart Underground on the southside, BTW.

    Metro North will only fail to realise its potential only if Dart Underground is not built but when both are operational, both will be a success and will transform Dublin and the way people move around the city.

    Once again I generally agree with you, but we must realise the inherent risk at our door. There is a chance that history will repeat itself and DU will be shelved completely, leaving MN as the aforementioned orphan. There is a habit in Irish politics of reinventing the wheel after years and years of procrastination.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 426 ✭✭Jack Noble


    DWCommuter wrote: »
    Once again I generally agree with you, but we must realise the inherent risk at our door. There is a chance that history will repeat itself and DU will be shelved completely, leaving MN as the aforementioned orphan. There is a habit in Irish politics of reinventing the wheel after years and years of procrastination.

    That is my big fear when I hear the likes of Gilmore and Costello spoofing around the projects for their own populist reasons. Neither had been briefed on Metro North by the RPA/DoT the last time I checked (before Christmas) - unlike FG whose most senior frontbenchers (Reilly and Noonan) have received detailed briefings on the project.

    Gilmore is coming out with whatever guff he thinks people want to hear and may garner a few extra votes for Labour - ie, shove back Metro North - without any thought or concern for the long-term consequences of what he is saying.

    Costello's is Labour's Transport spokesman but appears to be opposing DartU and MetroN for his own narrow NIMBY reasons in his north inner city and East Wall backyards. He should be removed from Transport before the election because he clearly has created a massive conflict of interest with regard to Metro North and, more worringly, Dart Underground.

    Hopefully, the wiser heads in Labour who will be around the Cabinet table if they get into govt with FG - Quinn, Burton, Rabbitte - will prevail on these projects and other policies Gilmore has spoofed on. If he doesn't get Finance, Ruairi Quinn would be an excellent choice for Transport because he actually understands urban planning, transportation and development.


  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 4,905 ✭✭✭Aard


    markpb wrote: »
    Where do people get this idea? It will join the Airport (which is now used as a BE intercharge), Luas Red Line, Luas Green line and the Dart (if DU is build). Luas BXD and F and Metro West would also have joined it if they were built.

    I'm not arguing for or against it, just against this idea that it's disconnected because it doesn't join Connolly or Heuston directly. Somehow, the Luas Green line manages to do very well even though it's *totally* disconnected.

    People think it's disconnected because they imagine it will be just as it is now with regards to ticketing: to travel on MN, you will require a seperate ticket.

    IMO, the RPA should really be pushing the idea of IT, because without it the thought of a "standalone" metro will proliferate.


  • Advertisement
  • Registered Users, Registered Users 2 Posts: 426 ✭✭Jack Noble


    Aard wrote: »
    People think it's disconnected because they imagine it will be just as it is now with regards to ticketing: to travel on MN, you will require a seperate ticket.

    IMO, the RPA should really be pushing the idea of IT, because without it the thought of a "standalone" metro will proliferate.

    No you won't - Integrated ticketing will be operational by 2017 when Metro begins running.

    Metro and Luas are RPA projects so even if IT is not up and running with Dart and Dublin Bus, you will still be able to get a single Metro/Luas ticket from Swords or the airport or any MetroN stop to Tallaght, Heuston, The Point, Dundrum and Cherrywood or vice versa by changing at either Abbey St or SSG - just as today you can get a ticket from anywhere on the Red Line or Green Lines at any stop on either line but have to walk from Abbey St from SSG or VV to use it.


Advertisement